The ongoing semanto-linguistic debate over the being and bounds of insider-trading has driven men to hope, despair and the brink of madness, It has even driven Congress to consider that most unprecedented act of all: doing something about it. But what if it were all for naught? What if prosecutors have always (or, at least for the last 17 years) had a bulletproof definition ready to hand, and were just using the wrong part of the criminal code? The very court that started all of the drama thinks they do, which is pretty embarrassing for all involved, and exceptionally bad news for Medicare inside dirt peddler David Blaszczak.