The law firm of choice for internationally focused companies

+263 242 744 677

admin@tsazim.com

4 Gunhill Avenue,

Harare, Zimbabwe

Midlevel Biglaw Associates Are Pretty Mad About How Awful The Technology Is At Their Firms – Above the Law

The
American
Lawyer
recently
revealed
its
2024
midlevel
survey,
which
showed
us
that

midlevels
are
frustrated

by
their
firms’
attempt
to
“return
to
pre-pandemic
norms,”
because
all
they’ve
known
during
their
careers
are
pandemic
norms.
On
top
of
that,
they
continue
to
be
absolutely
infuriated
by
their
firms’
technical
prowess

or
should
we
say,
the
lack
thereof.

As
part
of
Am
Law’s
annual
midlevel
survey,
associates
were
asked
to

rank
their
firms
on
all
things
tech
,
and
boy
oh
boy,
are
they
pissed.
How
mad
are
they?
As
noted
by
Am
Law,
“despite
the
growing
cash
flow,
midlevel
associate
attorneys
at
some
of
the
nation’s
top
firms
claim
their
workplaces
aren’t
investing
enough
in
technology.”
Here’s
more:

In
this
year’s
Midlevel
Associate
Tech
Survey,
a
number
of
associates
at
top
firms
once
again
told
The
American
Lawyer
they
were
frustrated
by
their
firms’
lack
of
tech
savviness
and
willingness
to
upgrade
equipment.
This
echoes
complaints
from
last
year,
and
it
should
be
noted
that
the
survey
regularly
elicits
similar
criticisms
about
some
of
the
world’s
richest
law
firms’
technology.

Which
firms
are
making
midlevels
gripe
the
most
about
their
tech
setups?
Am
Law
rounded
up
complaints
from
midlevels
at
firms
that
will
make
you
want
to
close
your
head
inside
your
laptop.
Here
are
some
examples:

  • Covington
    &
    Burling
    (“The
    technology
    is
    still
    quite
    poor
    for
    a
    firm
    of
    its
    size,”
    said
    one
    associate,
    while
    another
    said
    the
    firm’s
    tech
    is
    “abysmal.”);
  • Greenberg
    Traurig
    (where
    one
    associate
    said
    they
    were
    surprised
    by
    “how
    bad
    the
    technology
    is,”
    and
    that
    they
    “frequently
    need
    laptop
    batteries
    replaced
    because
    they
    are
    ‘about
    to
    explode.’”);
  • Skadden
    (where
    an
    associate
    griped
    that
    the
    firm
    is
    “[n]ickel
    and
    diming
    associates
    over
    technology
    expenses”);
    and
  • Gibson
    Dunn
    (“When
    most
    associates
    bill
    out
    at
    more
    than
    $1,000/hour,
    it’s
    embarrassing
    that
    the
    firm
    is
    so
    unbelievably
    cheap
    on
    its
    technology,”
    said
    a
    midlevel).

Enough
about
the
firms
with
tech
that’s
making
midlevel
associates
angry

let’s
get
to
the
rankings.
Which
firms
landed
on
top
when
it
comes
to
their
technology?
Here
are
the
top
10,
courtesy
of
Am
Law:

  1. Blank
    Rome
  2. O’Melveny
    &
    Myers
  3. Morgan
    Lewis
    &
    Bockius
  4. McDermott
    Will
    &
    Emery
  5. Baker
    &
    Hostetler
  6. Orrick
  7. Paul
    Hastings
  8. Kirkland
    &
    Ellis
  9. Snell
    &
    Wilmer
  10. Ropes
    &
    Gray

Click

here

to
see
the
full
list.

Congratulations
to
all
the
firms
that
earned
good
grades
on
this
list!
Hopefully
Biglaw
firms
that
received
low
ratings
will
figure
out
a
way
provide
the
tech
upgrades
their
midlevel
associates
need.


Lame
Laptops,
Batteries
‘About
to
Explode’:
Midlevel
Associates
Angered
by
Lack
of
Tech
Investment

[American
Lawyer]



Staci ZaretskyStaci
Zaretsky
 is
a
senior
editor
at
Above
the
Law,
where
she’s
worked
since
2011.
She’d
love
to
hear
from
you,
so
please
feel
free
to

email

her
with
any
tips,
questions,
comments,
or
critiques.
You
can
follow
her
on

X/Twitter

and

Threads

or
connect
with
her
on

LinkedIn
.