If
four
full
737s
were
crashing
daily
resulting
in
total
loss
of
life,
there
would
be
a
public
outcry
and
immediate
governmental
intervention.
Yet,
we
lose
an
equivalent
number
of
people
daily
—
275,000
American
lives
annually
—
to
adverse
drug
events
(ADEs).
This
public
health
crisis
largely
goes
unnoticed
because
it
happens
to
one
mother,
one
son,
one
sister,
and
one
friend
at
a
time
in
homes,
clinics,
emergency
rooms,
nursing
homes,
and
hospitals.
Outdated
surveillance
and
reporting
systems
mean
many
more
ADEs
go
unrecorded.
Most
ADEs
occur
when
medications
are
administered
and
taken
correctly,
contrary
to
the
popular
belief
that
this
is
most
frequently
due
to
non-adherence.
The
impact
is
worse
for
women,
who
are
twice
as
likely
to
experience
ADEs,
and
for
non-White
patients.
This
is
because
clinical
trials
for
the
generic
drugs
we
primarily
prescribe
were
conducted
years
ago
and
mostly
included
only
White
males
of
European
ancestry.
While
some
medication
harm
may
be
unavoidable,
studies
indicate
that
half
or
more
can
be
prevented
by
prioritizing
education,
equitable
healthcare
access,
and
technology,
which
will
require
legislative
action.
The
growing
public
health
crisis
In
2016,
the
last
time
it
was
measured,
we
spent
$528
billion
on
non-optimized
medication,
a
staggering
figure
that
exceeds
the
cost
of
the
drugs
themselves
or
any
major
chronic
disease.
The
more
medications
a
patient
takes,
the
higher
the
risk
of
ADEs.
Currently,
over
40
million
patients
take
five
or
more
medications
daily.
With
the
“silver
tsunami”
of
baby
boomers
aging
into
Medicare,
this
number
is
expected
to
double
by
2040.
The
time
to
act
is
now.
Despite
investment
in
precision
medicine,
pharmacogenomics
(PGx)
testing
is
still
underutilized
as
a
tool
for
reducing
avoidable
medication
harm.
PGx
testing
helps
determine
which
drugs
and
doses
are
likely
to
be
safe
and/or
effective
based
on
each
patient’s
genetic
makeup.
It
is
precision
medicine
for
medications.
Unlike
other
genetic
variations
that
are
usually
uncommon,
PGx
variations
occur
in
over
99%
of
patients.
A
single,
comprehensive,
multi-gene
test
can
help
maximize
the
safety
and
efficacy
of
many
commonly
prescribed
medications
used
in
mental
health,
pain
management,
cardiovascular
care,
cancer
care,
and
more.
Drug-gene
interactions
are
very
similar
to
drug-drug
interactions
–
in
fact,
the
FDA
has
stated
in
drug
development
guidance
that
they
are
similar
in
scope
and
should
therefore
receive
similar
attention.
The
key
differentiator
is
unlike
drugs,
genetics
cannot
be
altered.
Consider
the
1,300
patients
that
die
each
year,
not
from
cancer,
but
from
the
fluorouracil
or
capecitabine
treatment
itself.
For
5-7%
of
patients
with
DPYD
PGx
variants,
standard
doses
of
these
medications
can
be
toxic
with
a
25.6
times
increased
risk
of
treatment
related
death.
Or,
consider
the
8%
of
patients
with
certain
PGx
variations
impacting
citalopram
and
escitalopram
metabolism
that
are
34.3%
more
likely
to
become
suicide
victims
because
the
drugs
are
processed
out
too
quickly
to
provide
treatment
benefit
or
so
slowly
that
they
increase
adverse
effects
leading
to
treatment
discontinuation.
Perhaps
also
consider
the
patients
who
continue
to
receive
clopidogrel
without
PGx
testing
despite
an
FDA
black
box,
first
added
in
2010,
warning
that
patients
with
certain
PGx
variants
are
more
likely
to
have
another
heart
attack
or
stroke.
The
promise
of
PGx
testing
Biomarker
testing,
including
PGx
testing,
can
help
turn
this
tide.
Numerous
studies
have
confirmed
that
optimizing
prescribing
with
PGx
testing
reduces
emergency
room
visits,
hospitalizations,
and
healthcare
costs.
A
large
trial
in
several
European
countries
across
various
specialties
and
care
settings
showed
a
30%
reduction
in
clinically
significant
adverse
drug
events
in
just
12
weeks.
A
recent
meta-analysis
in
adult
cancer
patients
showed
a
53%
reduction
in
significant
adverse
events
with
use
of
PGx
testing.
And
despite
the
lack
of
widespread
adoption,
medical
liability
risks
are
increasing
when
evidence-based
PGx
testing
is
not
discussed
with
and
offered
to
patients.
So
why
isn’t
it
standard
of
care?
Numerous
hurdles
stand
in
the
way
of
PGx
testing
becoming
the
standard
of
care,
including:
-
Inconsistent
insurance
coverage:
A
significant
barrier
to
equitable
access
and
adoption
of
biomarker
testing,
including
PGx
testing,
is
inconsistent
insurance
coverage
that
has
not
kept
pace
with
professional
guidelines
and
advances
in
the
evidence.
This
has
led
to
further
socioeconomic,
racial,
and
ethnic
disparities
in
accessing
quality
care. -
Lack
of
education
and
clinical
decision
support:
Both
provider
and
patient
education
and
prioritization
of
integrated
clinical
decision
support
are
necessary
to
realize
the
benefits
of
genomic
medicine,
including
PGx-guided
medication
management. -
Pharmacists’
lack
of
recognition
as
healthcare
providers:
Although
many
states
recognize
pharmacists
as
healthcare
providers,
they
are
not
yet
acknowledged
as
providers
at
the
federal
level.
This
lack
of
federal
recognition
hinders
reimbursement
for
pharmacists,
despite
their
provision
of
numerous
and
essential
direct-care
patient
services
that
align
with
their
training,
including
PGx-guided
medication
management.
Support
biomarker
legislation
and
prioritize
PGx
education
To
address
insurance
coverage
barriers,
biomarker
legislation
has
been
enacted
in
sixteen
states
including
Arizona,
California,
Georgia,
Illinois,
Maryland,
Texas,
and
New
York,
and
introduced
in
eleven
others.
The
National
College
of
Insurance
Legislators
(NCOIL)
endorsed
model
biomarker
legislation
in
the
summer
of
2023,
setting
the
stage
for
expected
nationwide
adoption.
Typically,
this
legislation
requires
state
insurance
providers,
including
Medicaid
and
commercial
payers,
to
cover
tests
that
guide
treatment
decisions
based
on
medical
and
scientific
evidence
including
testing
covered
by
CMS
NCDs,
Medicare
Administrative
Contractor
LCDS,
or
nationally
recognized
clinical
practice
guidelines
and
consensus
statements.
Medicare
LCDs
have
covered
certain
evidence-based
PGx
testing
since
2020.
Clinicians
must
prioritize
educating
themselves
about
PGx
testing
and
incorporate
it
into
their
practice
to
improve
patient
safety
and
care.
Free
resources
can
be
found
at NIH
Inter-Society
Coordinating
Committee
for
Practitioner
Education
in
Genomics
(ISCC-PEG).
Healthcare
professionals
in
states
that
have
not
enacted
biomarker
legislation
can
learn
how
to
support
state
efforts
at
ACS
CAN.
Other
legislative
actions
and
advocacy efforts
to
improve
drug
safety
and
reduce
ADEs
are
also
in
the
works.
They
include:
-
Right
Drug
Dose
Now
Act
of
2024
–
You
can
urge
your
congressional
representatives
to
support
this
act
–
learn
more
and
sign
support
at
Fourth
Cause.
Reintroduced
by
Swalwell
and
Crenshaw
at
the
end
of
March,
this
bipartisan
act
would:-
Require
an
assessment
and
update
of
the
National
Action
Plan
for
Adverse
Drug
Event
Prevention; -
Create
a
healthcare
provider
educational
campaign
on
preventing
adverse
drug
events,
in
part
by
using
evidence-based
PGx
information. -
Incentivize
updates
to
electronic
health
record
systems
to
ensure
that
healthcare
providers
are
alerted
to
interactions
between
medications
and
genes
when
making
prescribing
decisions; -
Enhance
reporting
systems
that
would
assist
with
the
reporting
of
PGx-associated
adverse
drug
events -
A
second
associated
bill
authorizes
sustained
funding
for
PGx
implementation
research
and
guideline
development.
-
-
Pharmacy
and
Medically
Underserved
Areas
Enhancement
Act –
The
bill
would
enable
pharmacists
to
deliver
Medicare
Part
B
services
that
are
already
authorized
by
their
respective
state
laws. Learn
more
at
ASHP.
The
Hippocratic
oath
of
“first
do
no
harm”
can’t
stop
with
direct
patient
care;
the
healthcare
industry
and
its
key
stakeholders
must
address
persistent
public
health
problems
systematically. We
have
the
tools
to
reduce
medication
harm
by
half
or
more;
it
is
long
past
time
to
make
this
a
public
health
priority.
Common-sense
legislation
needs
to
be
passed
to
ensure
we
move
beyond
an
outdated
system
for
medication
management
and
safety
that
is
no
longer
serving
providers
or
the
patients
they
care
for.
Editor’s
note:
The
author
on
the
PGx
committee
of
the
NIH
Inter-Society
Coordinating
Committee
for
Practitioner
Education
in
Genomics
(ISCC-PEG),
a
member
of
the
PGx
workgroup
for
the
American
Cancer
Society
Cancer
Action
Network
(ACS
CAN)
and
serves
on
the
steering
committee
for
STRIPE,
the
FDA
collaborative
community
for
PGx.
Photo:
z_wei,
Getty
Images
Kristine
Ashcraft
has
worked
in
pharmacogenomics
since
2000
and
was
named
one
of
the
25
leading
global
voices
in
precision
medicine.
She
is
the
Founder
and
President
of
YouScript
(an
Aranscia
Company),
an
award-winning
clinical
decision
support
tool
that
has
integrated
PGx-guided
personalized
prescribing
in
the
clinical
workflow
for
over
a
decade.
Kristine
has
25+
years
of
experience
in
various
C-level,
board,
customer
success
and
business
development
roles.
She
has
authored
multiple
publications
on
the
clinical
and
economic
benefits
of
pharmacogenomic
testing
and
serves
on
numerous
PGx
advisory
groups
including
the
STRIPE
Steering
Committee,
the
FDA
collaborative
community
for
pharmacogenomics,
CPIC,
and
the
American
Cancer
Society
Cancer
Action
Network
PGx
task
force.
This
post
appears
through
the MedCity
Influencers
program.
Anyone
can
publish
their
perspective
on
business
and
innovation
in
healthcare
on
MedCity
News
through
MedCity
Influencers. Click
here
to
find
out
how.