Category: News Feeds

Litera’s
acquisition
strategy
feels
a
bit
like
a
good
Thanksgiving
plate
—
a
variety
of
different
components
piled
together
to
create
one
satisfying
feast.
Just
in
time
for
the
holiday,
the
company
announced
this
morning
that
it’s
adding
a
helping
of

Office
&
Dragons,
a
UK-headquartered
document
automation
company.

The
grand
plan
at
Litera
has
been
clear
for
a
while:
own
the
entire
legal
workflow.
From

acquiring
Kira
Systems
to
streamline
contract
review,
to

BigSquare
for
financial
and
business
intelligence,
the
company
has
steadily
built
a
one-stop
shop
for
law
firms.
Office
&
Dragons
joins
a
long
list
of
providers
brought
under
the
Litera
roof
—
and
more
importantly
brought
into
its
vision
of
the
attorney
workflow.

At
this
rate,
I
should
dust
off
my
phony
“generative
AI-enabled,
quantum-secured
data
compliance
solution”
startup
to
see
if
Litera
might
accidentally
buy
it
just
to
cover
every
possible
base
for
their
clients.

Office
&
Dragons
promises
up
to
97%
time
savings
serving
diverse
practice
areas
(Private
Equity,
Litigation,
Real
Estate
—
you
name
it).

Always
knew
Tom
Bombadil
was
up
to
something.

Office
&
Dragons
streamlines
document
intensive
work,
from
making
mass
edits
to
entire
suites
of
diverse
documents
with
one
click
to
quickly
spinning
out
suites
of
documents
for
a
particular
deal
type
with
forms,
templates,
precedents,
or
even
highly
negotiated,
bespoke
agreements.
The
product
also
provides
mass
redlining
and
collaborative
editing
capabilities.

There’s
a
delicate
balance
in
the
legal
tech
space
between
providing
a
product
that
will
save
lawyers
time
and
providing
a
product
that
will
rob
lawyers
of
billable
hours.
But
the
work
targeted
by
Office
&
Dragons
frees
up
that
magical
breed
of
wasted
time
that
both
the
client
doesn’t
want
to
pay
for
and
the
lawyer
doesn’t
even
particularly
want
to
bill.
That’s
the
sweet
spot
for
selling
tech
to
an
attorney.

Founder
and
CEO
Samuel
Smolkin
is
optimistic
about
the
move,
citing
the
growth
opportunities
afforded
by
Litera’s
resources.
As
he
put
it,
“With
integrations
spanning
Compare,
Kira,
Transact,
and
beyond,
we
aim
to
make
Office
&
Dragons
an
essential
part
of
every
lawyer’s
toolkit—helping
them
save
hours
of
repetitive
work,
focus
on
higher-value
tasks,
and
improve
their
quality
of
life.”
Litera
CEO
Avaneesh
Marwaha
captured
this
vision
succinctly,
noting
that
the
acquisition
reflects
Litera’s
“ongoing
commitment
to
expand
our
portfolio
with
mission-critical
tools
that
integrate
with
native
attorney
workflows.”

You
might
say
with
this
deal,
Litera
has
rolled
a
natural
20!
Ugh.
No,
you
wouldn’t
be
that
nerdy.
Let’s
just
say
they’ve
truly
won
the
Game
of
Thrones
this
time.
By
George,
that’s
arguably
worse.
Wait,
the
“George”
in
that
expression
is
also
a
dragon
reference!
Anyway,
this
deal
will
certainly
help
Litera
tip
the
scales
for
its
customers.
Oh,
I
give
up.

Joe
Patrice is
a
senior
editor
at
Above
the
Law
and
co-host
of

Thinking
Like
A
Lawyer.
Feel
free
to email
any
tips,
questions,
or
comments.
Follow
him
on Twitter or

Bluesky
if
you’re
interested
in
law,
politics,
and
a
healthy
dose
of
college
sports
news.
Joe
also
serves
as
a

Managing
Director
at
RPN
Executive
Search.

The
Biglaw
bonus
announcements
are
coming
in
like
magic…
circle,
that
is.
That’s
right,
the
latest
firm
to
delight
associates
with
news
of
their
new
bonus
scale
is
Clifford
Chance.

Last
year,
the
firm
took
in
$2,861,200,000
in
gross
revenue
and
now
they’re
sharing
the
good
fortune
with
associates.
Today,
Clifford
Chance
sent
a
memo
to
its
U.S.
associates
announcing
the
firm
will
be
matching
the
Milbank
scale
—
for
both
year-end
and
special
bonuses.
That
puts
the
compensation
schedule
at
the
firm
as
follows:

Bonuses
will
be
paid
on
January
15.
You
can
read
the
full
memo
on

the
next
page.

Remember
everyone,
we
depend
on
your
tips
to
stay
on
top
of
compensation
updates,
so
when
your
firm
announces
or
matches,
please
text
us
(646-820-8477)
or email
us (subject
line:
“[Firm
Name]
Bonus/Matches”).
Please
include
the
memo
if
available.
You
can
take
a
photo
of
the
memo
and
send
it
via
text
or
email
if
you
don’t
want
to
forward
the
original
PDF
or
Word
file.

And
if
you’d
like
to
sign
up
for
ATL’s
Bonus
Alerts
(which
is
the
alert
list
we
also
use
for
salary
announcements),
please
scroll
down
and
enter
your
email
address
in
the
box
below
this
post.
If
you
previously
signed
up
for
the
bonus
alerts,
you
don’t
need
to
do
anything.
You’ll
receive
an
email
notification
within
minutes
of
each
bonus
announcement
that
we
publish.
Thanks
for
your
help!

Kathryn
Rubino
is
a
Senior
Editor
at
Above
the
Law,
host
of

The
Jabot
podcast,
and
co-host
of

Thinking
Like
A
Lawyer.
AtL
tipsters
are
the
best,
so
please
connect
with
her.
Feel
free
to
email

her
with
any
tips,
questions,
or
comments
and
follow
her
on
Twitter

@Kathryn1 or
Mastodon

@[email protected].

Enter
your
email
address
to
sign
up
for
ATL’s

Bonus
&
Salary
Increase
Alerts.

Remember
when
I
said
that
Drake’s
loss
against
Kendrick
was
so
overwhelming

that
the
only
recourse
he
had
left
was
to
take
him
to
court
for
defamation?
Turns
out,
I
was
only
half
right.
Drake
is
going
to
court,
but
if
you
thought
the
only
RICO
accusations
involving
a
major
rapper
would
be
against
Young
Thug,
think
again!
The

disgraced
gambling
advertiser
is
suing
his
record
label
(Universal
Music
Group)
and
Spotify
because
“Not
Like
Us”
was
too
well
received
by
the
public.

NPR
has
coverage:

Drake
has
filed
a
petition
against
Spotify
and
Universal
Music
Group,
accusing
the
companies
of
conspiring
to
inflate
the
streaming
and
radio
numbers
of
Kendrick
Lamar’s
“Not
Like
Us”
amid
the
rappers’
months
long
feud.

Drake
says
in
the
petition,
filed
in
the
New
York
court
system,
that
UMG
paid
influencers,
radio
stations
and
others
to
promote
the
song
and
use
bots
to
increase
the
song’s
popularity.

He
references
the
companies’
multi-year
licensing
agreement,
and
says
they
have
“a
long-standing,
symbiotic
business
relationship”
in
which
UMG
charged
Spotify
a
licensing
fee
30%
less
than
usual
for
“Not
Like
Us.”
In
exchange,
Spotify
frequently
recommended
the
song
to
users,
he
says.

Drake
is
no
stranger
to
the
notion
that
a
music
company
and
streaming
service
can
artificially
elevate
and
push
the
work
of
an
artist:

But
things
seem
different
with
Kendrick.
“Not
Like
Us”
could
have
just
been
a
wildly
popular
song
that
was
played
everywhere
and
by
everyone:

While
it’s
a
little
early
to
speak
on
the
legal
merits
of
Drake’s
accusations,
there’s
a
general
understanding
that
Drake’s
lawsuit
is
about
as
far
from
hip-hop
as
it
gets:

This
is
the
tamest
way
to
put
things.
Others
have
been
far
more…
creative
with
their
disappointment.
Some
go
for
the
easy
tee-hee:

Others
delve
a
little
deeper
and
question
Drake’s
interesting
triaging
of
what
issues
to
tackle:

The
most
unfortunate
thing
about
all
of
this?

Drake
spent
weeks
goading
Kendrick
to
respond.
It
is
unclear
if
anyone
in
Drake’s
camp
warned
him
that
getting
into
a
word
fight
with
a
Pulitzer
Prize
winner
didn’t
bode
well,
but
the
consequences
became
very
clear,
very
quickly.
Once
Kendrick
did,
the
ensuing
records
—
“Meet
The
Grahams,”
specifically
—
were
some
of
the
most
haunting
dissections
of
an
opponent
the
genre
has
seen
in
a
decades.
Even
if
Drake
ultimately
wins
in
the
court
of
law,
the
court
of
public
opinion
says
otherwise.

Nothing
is
gonna
be
the
same
all
right.
Ball
up
top.

Meanwhile,
a
second
Drake
lawsuit
recently
hit
the
courtroom,
and
this
time
he’s
addressing
the
pedophilia
allegations.
Billboard
has
coverage:

Drake
has
launched
a
second
bombshell
legal
action
against
Universal
Music
Group
over
Kendrick
Lamar’s
“Not
Like
Us,”
accusing
the
music
giant
of
defamation
and
claiming
it
could
have
halted
the
release
of
a
song
“falsely
accusing
him
of
being
a
sex
offender.”

Better
late
than
never,
but
who
in
their
right
mind
wouldn’t
lead
with
“Hey,
stop
saying
I
diddle
kids”
before
accusations
of
inflated
plays?
Do
better,
6
God.

Drake
Accuses
Universal
Music
Group
And
Spotify
Of
Unfairly
Promoting
Kendrick
Lamar’s
‘Not
Like
Us’
[NPR]

Drake
Files
Second
Action
Against
UMG,
Alleging
Defamation
Over
Kendrick
Lamar’s
‘False’
Song
[Billboard]

Earlier:

Drake
Really
Has
One
Option
Left
Against
Kendrick
If
He
Wants
To
Win

Chris
Williams
became
a
social
media
manager
and
assistant
editor
for
Above
the
Law
in
June
2021.
Prior
to
joining
the
staff,
he
moonlighted
as
a
minor
Memelord™
in
the
Facebook
group Law
School
Memes
for
Edgy
T14s.
 He
endured
Missouri
long
enough
to
graduate
from
Washington
University
in
St.
Louis
School
of
Law.
He
is
a
former
boatbuilder
who
cannot
swim, a
published
author
on
critical
race
theory,
philosophy,
and
humor,
and
has
a
love
for
cycling
that
occasionally
annoys
his
peers.
You
can
reach
him
by
email
at [email protected] and
by
tweet
at @WritesForRent.

WASHINGTON
—
The
Pentagon
has
long
pushed
back
against
the
establishment
of
a
new
military
service
dedicated
to

cyberspace,
but
with
President-elect

Donald
Trump
on
his
way
back
to
the

White
House,
a
separate
cyber
force
has
a
real
shot
at
becoming
a
reality,
according
to
experts
and
to
lawmakers
who
support
the
move.

“This
change
in
administration
potentially
could
give
more
impetus
to
the
creation
of
a
separate
cyber
service,”


Quentin
Hodgson,
formerly
the
Pentagon’s
director
of
Cyber
Plans,
told
Breaking
Defense.
“[Trump]
did
that
with
the

Space
Force.
It
was
something
that
the
Department
of
Defense
didn’t
want,
but
he
decided
he
wanted
it,
and
it’s
possible
that
that
could
also
happen
with
cyberspace.”

Hodgson
was
hardly
alone
in
connecting
Trump’s
then-controversial
move
to
stand
up
the
Space
Force
in
2019
to
visions
of
what
his
second
term
could
bring
to
the
cyber
realm.
Among
those
who
made
the
comparison
to
Breaking
Defense
was
Rep.
Pat
Fallon,
a
Texas
Republican
and
vocal
supporter
of
the
cyber
force
idea.

“As
the
past
half
century
has
shown
us,
there
will
be
naysayers
and
contrarians
within
the
Pentagon
who
will
do
everything
to
slow-roll
major
changes.
However,
only
six
years
ago,
we
had
the
same
issue
in
the
space
domain,”
Fallon
said
in
an
email.
“We
need
concrete
progress
and
limited
stagnation
in
cyber,
something
I
know
the
Trump
Administration
will
emphasize
throughout
the
next
four
years.”

Fallon
and
Rep.
Morgan
Luttrell,
another
Texas
Republican,
authored
an
amendment
in
the

2025
National
Defense
Authorization
Act
that
called
for
an
independent
third-party
study
to
help
lawmakers
and
DoD
leaders
determine
if
a
separate
cyber
force
is
necessary.
The
study
is
being
conducted
by
the

National
Academies
of
Sciences,
Engineering
and
Medicine.

“Incumbent
on
the
results
of
the
commission,
which
I
think
will
affirm
the
need
for
a
cyber
service,
I
believe
there’s
a
good
chance
we
will
see
[a
cyber
service]
come
to
fruition
in
soon.
The
Trump
administration
has
shown
that
they
will
not
put
up
with
the
status
quo,
and
will
opt
for
bold
action,
if
necessary,
especially
when
US
national
security
is
at
risk,”
Fallon
said. 

Luttrell,
like
Fallon,
said
in
an
interview
that
he
thought
that
if
the
third-party
study
came
back
recommending
an
independent
cyber
force,
Trump
would
likely
be
on
board,
but
ultimately,
it
is
“most
certainly
the
president’s
call.”

“As
a
congressional
member,
if
I
want
to
know
the
advancements
in
AI,
technology,
name
any
given
space,
where
do
I
get
to
go
to
that?
Do
I
have
to
go
talk
to
the
Army,
Navy,
Air
Force,
Marines,
or
go
talk
to
[Cyber
Command]?”
Luttrell
told
Breaking
Defense.
“Or
could
I
go
to
cyber
force,
talk
to
the
leadership,
like,
‘Hey,
where
are
we?’
And
then
they
could
say,
‘This
is
where
we
stand.
This
is
what
we
implemented.’”

‘These
Guys
Like
To
Build
Things’

Outside
experts
agreed
that
a
Trump
administration
would,
as
the
Foundation
for
Defense
of
Democracies
Mark
Montgomery
put
it,
“look
more
favorably”
on
a
separate
cyber
service.
Montgomery,
the
senior
director
for
FDD’s
Center
on
Cyber
and
Technology
Innovation,
said
such
a
service
could
“address
our
poor
cyber
force
generation
efforts
over
the
past
decade.”

Emily
Harding,
vice
president
of
the
Defense
and
Security
Department
at
the
Center
for
Strategic
and
International
Studies,
told
Breaking
Defense
that
the
possibility
of
a
cyber
force
under
Trump’s
second
term
is
a
“big
shrug”
and
that
she
has
“zero
evidence”
it’s
in
the
works.
But,
she
said,
“I
also
know
these
guys
like
to
build
things,
and
you
know
they
were
the
ones
responsible
for
Space
Force,
so
why
not?” 

She
added
that
Trump’s
seemingly
close
relationship
with
SpaceX
founder
and
technology
innovator

Elon
Musk
—
who
was
recently
tapped
by
Trump
to
co-lead
the
new

Department
of
Government
Efficiency
—
is
another
factor
that
could
lead
to
a
cyber
force. 

“You
could
see
somebody
like
Elon
Musk
understanding
this
in
a
way
that
you
know
other
people
might
not.
So
I
don’t
know.
I
think
there’s
a
decent
chance
that
they
pursue
it.
I
think
they
should
pursue
it,”
she
said. 

Harding
said
she
primarily
supports
a
cyber
force
because
she
believes
an
independent
service
will
allow
the
military
to
find
the
most
cyber-capable
fighters. 

“The
kinds
of
skills
that
you’re
recruiting
for
in
a
cyber
service
or
in
a
cyber
role
are
very
different
from
the
kinds
of
skills
you’re
recruiting
for
in
what
you
consider
the
other
branches
of
the
military,”
she
said. 

“I
think
you
would
want
a
different
setup
for
recruiting
and
for
training.
In
the
other
services,
each
one
of
them
has
a
cyber
skill
set.
They
have
a
cyber
specialty,
but
there’s
not
necessarily
the
same
path
to
advancement.
So
I
think
it’s
worth
it
to
create
the
separate
service,
to
create
the
talent
pipeline
and
the
specific
structures
that
you
would
need
for
reserve,”
she
added. 

The
Pentagon
disagrees,
arguing
that
the
creation
of
a
separate
cyber
force
could
create
new
challenges
for
the
DoD
in
terms
of
understanding
warfighting
needs
within
each
service. 

“A
cyber
service
might
have
some
benefits
in
ease
of
administrative
management,
but
we
have
a
variety
of
…military
services
in
the
Department
of
Defense
who
perform
a
variety
of
missions,”

Mieke
Eoyang,
deputy
assistant
secretary
of
defense
for
cyber
policy,


said
last
year. “Having
a
cyber
service
that
is
divorced
from
those
particular
mission
sets
may
pose
some
challenges
in
understanding
the
warfighting
needs
of
the
services
to
provide
cyber
to
enable
that
fight.” 

“I
think
the
question
is
that
for
people
who
think
the
cyber
service
is
the
answer
to
our
…
current
challenges
in
cyber
personnel
management:
be
careful
what
you
wish
for,”
she
said.

Related:

‘Be
careful
what
you
wish
for:’
DoD
official
warns
separate
cyber
force
could
pose
new
challenges

Furthermore,


at
the
end
of
September,
the
department
formally
requested
that
lawmakers
shut
down
Fallon
and
Luttrell’s
proposal
for
the
independent
assessment.
DoD
leaders
contended
that
Congress
had
already
called
for
an
assessment
of
the
current
cyber
landscape
within
the
Pentagon,
which
included
the
potential
for
creating
a
cyber
service
in
the
2023
NDAA. 

Jacquelyn
Schneider,
a
fellow
at
the
Hoover
Institution
where
she
serves
as
the
director
of
the
Hoover
Wargaming
and
Crisis
Simulation
Initiative,
is
also
against
the
creation
of
a
new
cyber
service.
She
argued
that
rather
than
consolidating
cyber
expertise
and
infrastructure,
it
would
lead
to
information
silos
that
would
make
the
military
less
effective
in
the
cyber
domain.

“In
a
world
in
which
warfare
is
inherently
joint,
every
time
you
create
these
different
organizations,
you
create
information
stove
pipes,”
said
Schneider,
who
also
previously
served
as
a
senior
policy
advisor
to
the
Cyberspace
Solarium
Commission.

Right
now
it’s
unclear
where
exactly
Trump
stands,
and
his
transition
team
did
not
respond
to
a
request
for
comment. 

But
Scneider,
too,
said
she
could
see
a
new
cyber
force
taking
shape
under
a
Trump
administration.

“Trump
likes
to
make
services,”
she
said.

Bonus
announcements
are
flying
fast
and
furious
across
the
Biglaw
landscape,
with
Milbank
matches
behind
handed
out
left
and
right
hardworking
associates,
inclusive
of
the
compensation
leader’s

year-end
bonuses
and

special
bonuses.

The
latest
firm
announce
bonuses
is
Debevoise
&
Plimpton,
which
brought
in
$1,355,559,000
in
gross
revenue
in
2023,
putting
it
at
No.
37
on
the
Am
Law
100.
With
all
that
money,
the
firm
was
ready,
willing,
and
able
to
match
the
generous
Milbank
scale.
Here’s
what
bonuses
look
like
at
Debevoise:

Congratulations
to
everyone
at
Debevoise!

Remember
everyone,
we
depend
on
your
tips
to
stay
on
top
of
compensation
updates,
so
when
your
firm
announces
or
matches,
please
text
us
(646-820-8477)
or email
us (subject
line:
“[Firm
Name]
Bonus/Matches”).
Please
include
the
memo
if
available.
You
can
take
a
photo
of
the
memo
and
send
it
via
text
or
email
if
you
don’t
want
to
forward
the
original
PDF
or
Word
file.

And
if
you’d
like
to
sign
up
for
ATL’s
Bonus
Alerts
(which
is
the
alert
list
we
also
use
for
salary
announcements),
please
scroll
down
and
enter
your
email
address
in
the
box
below
this
post.
If
you
previously
signed
up
for
the
bonus
alerts,
you
don’t
need
to
do
anything.
You’ll
receive
an
email
notification
within
minutes
of
each
bonus
announcement
that
we
publish.
Thanks
for
your
help!

Staci
Zaretsky is
a
senior
editor
at
Above
the
Law,
where
she’s
worked
since
2011.
She’d
love
to
hear
from
you,
so
please
feel
free
to

email
her
with
any
tips,
questions,
comments,
or
critiques.
You
can
follow
her
on

X/Twitter
and

Threads
or
connect
with
her
on

LinkedIn.

Enter
your
email
address
to
sign
up
for
ATL’s

Bonus
&
Salary
Increase
Alerts.

Ed.
note:
Welcome
to
our
daily
feature,

Quote
of
the
Day.

They
put
a
lot
of
resources
into
the
U.K.
piece
and
as
a
result,
you
saw
a
lack
of
resources
in
the
U.S.
People
said,
‘You
know
what?
I
can
go
elsewhere
and
be
supported
with
resources
and
be
more
profitable.’

—
A
former
Bryan
Cave
Leighton
Paisner
partner,
in
comments
given
to
the

American
Lawyer,
on
the
“dwindling
support”
the
firm
has
offered
to
U.S.
partners.
Six
years
after
Bryan
Cave
merged
with
Berwin
Leighton
Paisner,
the
combined
firm
is
reportedly
considering
further
mergers
after
slow
with
and
a
loss
of
nearly
50
lateral
partners.
“I
think
the
firm
needs
a
merger
or
some
other
transaction,”
another
source
told

Am
Law.
“It’s
not
apparent
to
me
it
will
be
able
to
continue
on
its
present
course
in
the
long
run.”

Staci
Zaretsky is
a
senior
editor
at
Above
the
Law,
where
she’s
worked
since
2011.
She’d
love
to
hear
from
you,
so
please
feel
free
to

email
her
with
any
tips,
questions,
comments,
or
critiques.
You
can
follow
her
on

X/Twitter
and

Threads
or
connect
with
her
on

LinkedIn.

Big
bonus
money
continues
to
be
the
big
story
in
Biglaw.
Now
that
the
industry
has
gotten
on
board
with
the
Milbank
bonus
scale
—
of
both
the

year-end
and

special
variety
—
the
top
of
Biglaw
is
falling
all
over
themselves
to
show
that
they’re
one
of
the
big
players
in
Biglaw.
The
latest
firm
to
announce
a
Milbank
match
on
associate
bonuses
is
Katten
Muchin
Rosenman.

The
firm
took
in
$781,654,000
in
gross
revenue
last
year,
making
it
#66
on
the
Am
Law
100.
All
that
cash
on
hand
and
the
firm
is
sharing
it
with
associates,
if
they’ve
been
busy
billing,
of
course.

The
year-end
bonus
schedule
at
Katten
is
a
little
more
complex
then
most.
But
associates
can
take
down
market
bonuses
once
they
bill
2,000
hours.
Additional
billables
are
rewarded
as
per
this
chart.

Plus,
there
are
the
special
bonuses
that
associates
can
add
to
their
comp
package
when
they
hit
2,000
hours.

On
top
of
all
these
associate
bonuses,
“superstar”
bonuses
are
also
available
on
a
discretionary
basis.

Bonuses
will
be
paid
on
February
3.
You
can
read
the
full
memo

on
the
next
page.

Remember
everyone,
we
depend
on
your
tips
to
stay
on
top
of
compensation
updates,
so
when
your
firm
announces
or
matches,
please
text
us
(646-820-8477)
or email
us (subject
line:
“[Firm
Name]
Bonus/Matches”).
Please
include
the
memo
if
available.
You
can
take
a
photo
of
the
memo
and
send
it
via
text
or
email
if
you
don’t
want
to
forward
the
original
PDF
or
Word
file.

And
if
you’d
like
to
sign
up
for
ATL’s
Bonus
Alerts
(which
is
the
alert
list
we
also
use
for
salary
announcements),
please
scroll
down
and
enter
your
email
address
in
the
box
below
this
post.
If
you
previously
signed
up
for
the
bonus
alerts,
you
don’t
need
to
do
anything.
You’ll
receive
an
email
notification
within
minutes
of
each
bonus
announcement
that
we
publish.
Thanks
for
your
help!

Kathryn
Rubino
is
a
Senior
Editor
at
Above
the
Law,
host
of

The
Jabot
podcast,
and
co-host
of

Thinking
Like
A
Lawyer.
AtL
tipsters
are
the
best,
so
please
connect
with
her.
Feel
free
to
email

her
with
any
tips,
questions,
or
comments
and
follow
her
on
Twitter

@Kathryn1 or
Mastodon

@[email protected].

Enter
your
email
address
to
sign
up
for
ATL’s

Bonus
&
Salary
Increase
Alerts.