Top 25 Biglaw Firm Offers Bonuses On Top Of Bonuses For High Billers – Above the Law

Thanksgiving
is
tomorrow,
and
this
holiday
season,
Biglaw
associates’
bank
accounts
are
being
stuffed
like
turkeys
thanks
to
firm
after
firm
matching
Milbank’s
generous

year-end
bonuses

and

special
bonuses
.

The
latest
firm
that’s
letting
hardworking
associates
gobble
up
bonuses
is
Mayer
Brown.
The
firm,
which
brought
in
$1,908,000,000
in
gross
revenue
in
2023,
putting
it
at
No.
23
on
the
Am
Law
100.
That
said,
here’s
what
the
bonus
grid
looks
like
at
Mayer
Brown:

IMG_8480

Once
again,
the
firm
is
truly
sharing
the
wealth
by
offering
additional
bonuses
on
top
of
its
already
generous
bonus
scale
for
its
highest
billers.

Congratulations
to
everyone
at
Mayer
Brown!

Remember
everyone,
we
depend
on
your
tips
to
stay
on
top
of
compensation
updates,
so
when
your
firm
announces
or
matches,
please
text
us
(646-820-8477)
or email
us
 (subject
line:
“[Firm
Name]
Bonus/Matches”).
Please
include
the
memo
if
available.
You
can
take
a
photo
of
the
memo
and
send
it
via
text
or
email
if
you
don’t
want
to
forward
the
original
PDF
or
Word
file.

And
if
you’d
like
to
sign
up
for
ATL’s
Bonus
Alerts
(which
is
the
alert
list
we
also
use
for
salary
announcements),
please
scroll
down
and
enter
your
email
address
in
the
box
below
this
post.
If
you
previously
signed
up
for
the
bonus
alerts,
you
don’t
need
to
do
anything.
You’ll
receive
an
email
notification
within
minutes
of
each
bonus
announcement
that
we
publish.
Thanks
for
your
help!



Staci ZaretskyStaci
Zaretsky
 is
a
senior
editor
at
Above
the
Law,
where
she’s
worked
since
2011.
She’d
love
to
hear
from
you,
so
please
feel
free
to

email

her
with
any
tips,
questions,
comments,
or
critiques.
You
can
follow
her
on

X/Twitter

and

Threads

or
connect
with
her
on

LinkedIn
.


Bonus Time

Enter
your
email
address
to
sign
up
for
ATL’s

Bonus
&
Salary
Increase
Alerts
.


Morning Docket: 11.27.24 – Above the Law

(Photo
by
Tasos
Katopodis/Getty
Images)

*
Jane
Rosenberg
talks
about
Rudy
Giuliani’s
outburst
yesterday
and
her
destined-to-be-iconic
portrait
of
the
former
mayor.
[

CNN]

*
The
effort
to
expand
the
federal
judiciary
to
deal
with
court
clog
has
struggled
to
get
through
Congress,
but
now
that
it
could
give
Trump
an
opportunity
to
appoint
more
FedSoc
kids
straight
off
their
clerkships,
there’s
suddenly
a
lot
more
interest.
[Bloomberg
Law
News
]

*
Biglaw
settles
with
partner
over
alleged
age
discrimination.
[ABA
Journal
]

*
A
breakdown
of
the
recent
Federalist
Society
convention
beyond
just
the

unhinged
Judge
Jones
tirade
.
[Defector]

*
Government
lawyers
eyeing
the
exits.
[Reuters]

*
Could
Trump’s
selection
of
Linda
McMahon
for
the
Department
of
Education
undermine
higher
education
diversity
initiatives?
(Much
like
professional
wrestling…
we
already
know
how
this
is
going
to
end)
[American
Lawyer
]

*
A
decade
ago,
no
one
questioned
the
Fourteenth
Amendment’s
citizenship
language.
Now
prominent
conservative
voices
are

proposing
loopholes
to
the
ironclad
language
.
This
creeping
acceptance
opens
the
door
to
a
lot
of
mischief.
[Mother
Jones
]

Time to accelerate Zimbabwe’s $21 billion public debt and arrears resolution process, say stakeholders

After
nearly
two
years
of
dialogue
with
development
partners,
Zimbabwe
says
it
is
ready
to
accelerate
the
arrears
clearance
and
debt
resolution
process
by
working
with
the
International
Monetary
Fund
for
a
staff
monitored
programme
(SMP)
to
start
in
January
2025.

The
IMF’s
programme
falls
under
the
economic
reforms
Zimbabwe
is
undertaking
as
part
of
the
process
to
clear
its
$21
billion
public
debt
and
arrears.

Addressing
the
6th Structural
Dialogue
of
the
process
hosted
by
the
Zimbabwe
government
in
the
capital
Harare,
President
Dr
Emmerson
Mnangagwa
expressed
support
for
the
IMF
programme
and
called
for
financial
intervention
to
protect
vulnerable
groups
of
the
population
that
will
be
negatively
affected.

“In
this
regard,
the
protection
of
the
vulnerable
groups,
through
effective
social
protection
programmes
is
of
critical
importance
to
my
government,”
President
Mnangagwa
told
creditors,
development
partners,
private
sector
players,
civil
society
organisations
and
farmers’
organisations
at
Monday’s
high-level
dialogue.

The
President
and
Chairman
of
the
Boards
of
Directors
of
the
African
Development
Bank
Dr
Akinwumi
Adesina
termed
the
IMF
programme
“a
significant
milestone
towards
concretizing
the
arrears
clearance
and
debt
resolution.”

“I
would
like
to
urge
here
that
our
collective
efforts
will
be
critical
to
ensure
that
this
is
a
wet-SMP
(a
supported
staff
monitored
programme)
that
will
provide
fiscal
space
for
the
country
to
implement
needed
reforms
and
protect
the
vulnerable
populations,”
said
Adesina,
the
Champion
of
the
process.

President
of
the
African
Development
Bank
Group,
Dr.
Akinwumi
Adesina
addressing
a
High-level
Structured
Dialogue
Platform
meeting
on
Zimbabwe’s
arrears
clearance
and
debt
resolution
process,
in
Harare,
Zimbabwe,
November
25,
2024

Working
groups
formed
under
the
dialogue
process
to
oversee
reforms
across
the
three
sectors
of
Economic
Growth
and
Stability
Reforms,
Governance,
Land
Tenure
and
Compensation,
presented
their
updates.

Praising
what
he
described
as
“an
inclusive
and
transparent
consultative
process”,
President Mnangagwa
outlined
a
series
of
fiscal,
governance
and
legislative
reforms
that
the
government
has
embarked
upon
to
improve
macroeconomics
stability,
and
government
efficiency
and
accountability.

The
reforms
include
the
launch
of
a
new
local
currency,
a
more
flexible
and
transparent
foreign
exchange
market,
and
the
introduction
of
new
parliamentary
bills
to
strengthen
the
fight
against
corruption.

Others
are
the
far-reaching
land
tenure
reforms
to
promote
investor
confidence,
and
a
$35
million
compensation
package
for
more
than
400
farmers
affected
by
a
land
redistribution
program
in
the
1990s.
In
addition,
all
land
held
by
beneficiaries
of
99-year
leases
and
offer
letters
under
the
land
reform
program
will
now
be
covered
by
bankable
and
transferable
documents
of
tenure
to
be
issued
by
government.

Reflecting
on
the
two-year
journey,
Adesina
said,
“We
have
made
more
progress
in
two
years
than
all
the
prior
21
years
since
the
sanctions
were
imposed.
The
high-level
structured
dialogue
is
the
only
way,
there
is
no
other
way.”

The
Bank
Group
president
called
for
a
new
lease
of
life
for
Zimbabwe
and
its
people:
“It
is
clearly
time
to
bring
this
to
a
close,
end
the
decades
of
untold
damage
to
the
economy
of
Zimbabwe,
the
suffering
of
its
people,
and
have
a
new
beginning
with
collective
hope,
aspiration
and
shared
prosperity,
for
its
people,
today
and
well
into
the
future,”
Adesina
declared.

He
pointed
out
that
23
years
of
sanctions
had
“left
Zimbabwe
with
a
pile
of
debt
which
has
risen
to
$21
billion

$13
billion
for
external
debt
and
$8
billion
of
domestic
debt.
Even
wars
never
last
this
long.”

“We
all
agree
we
must
play
our
part
to
correct
this
anomaly
and
give
a
new
lease
of
life
to
this
nation
and
its
people,
so
Zimbabwe
can
run
again,”
Adesina
stressed.
“Run,
to
build
first
rate
schools.
Run,
to
build
infrastructure,
from
transport
corridors,
railways
and
power
transmission
lines
that
will
integrate
the
SADC
region
and
boost
economic
growth
and
jobs.”

Speaking
by
video
message,
the
high-level
facilitator
of
the
resolution
process,
former
President
of
Mozambique,
Joaquim
Chissano,
urged
the
international
community
to
do
more
to
support
the
government
of
Zimbabwe
with
the
financial
and
technical
resources
required
to
implement
the
ongoing
reforms.

Chissano
and
President
Mnangagwa
praised
Adesina
for
his
role
as
the
Champion
of
the
process
and
also
thanked
the
African
Development
Bank
for
providing $4.2
million
to
facilitate
and
support
the
structured
dialogue.
The
Bank
is
also
financing technical
and
legal
advisors
to
help
develop
a
comprehensive
roadmap
for
the
debt
resolution
process.

President
of
Zimbabwe,
Dr
Emmerson
Mnangagwa
(center),
flanked
by
the
President
of
the
African
Development
Bank
Group,
Dr.
Akinwumi
Adesina
(second
left),
and
Zimbabwe’s
Minister
of
Finance,
Economic
Development
and
Investment
Promotion,
Prof
Mthuli
Ncube
(second
right)
at
a
High-level
Structured
Dialogue
Platform
meeting
in
Harare,
Zimbabwe,
November
25,
2024

Adesina
said
the
Bank’s
Board
of
Directors
will
consider
continued
support
for
the
process.
In
addition,
the
Bank
will
set
aside
funding
in
the
next
replenishment
cycle
for
its
concessional
financing
arm,
the
African
Development
Fund,
for
clearing
Zimbabwe’s
arrears,
similar
to
what
the
Bank
did
for
Sudan
and
Somalia.

Bolstering
his
argument
for
a
sanctions-free
Zimbabwe,
Adesina
highlighted
its
geostrategic
importance
to
Southern
Africa,
as
well
as
the
abundant
mineral
and
metal
deposits
that
make
it
critical
to
the
global
energy
transition.
He
emphasized,
“Zimbabwe
is
too
critical
for
the
world
to
ignore.”

Source:


Speech
delivered
by
Dr.
Akinwumi
A.
Adesina
President
and
Chairman,
African
Development
Bank
Group

High-level
Structured
Dialogue
Platform
Meeting
on
Arrears
Clearance
and
Debt
Resolution
for
Zimbabwe

|
African
Development
Bank
Group

Zimbabwe Vigil Diary 23rd November 2024



https://www.flickr.com/photos/zimbabwevigil/54166022143/sizes/m/

They
carried
placards
expressing
their
dissatisfaction
with
ZANU
PF,
Zimbabwe’s
ruling
regime. 
Photos:


https://www.flickr.com/photos/zimbabwevigil/albums/72177720322179677/
.

For
Vigil
pictures
check: http://www.flickr.com/photos/zimbabwevigil/.
Please
note:
Vigil
photos
can
only
be
downloaded
from
our
Flickr
website.


 


Events
and
Notices:


  • Next
    Vigil
    meeting
    outside
    the
    Zimbabwe
    Embassy. 
    Saturday
    7th December
    from
    2

    5
    pm.
    We
    meet
    on
    the
    first
    and
    third
    Saturdays
    of
    every
    month.
    On
    other
    Saturdays
    the
    virtual
    Vigil
    will
    run.

  • The
    Restoration
    of
    Human
    Rights
    in
    Zimbabwe
    (ROHR)
     is
    the
    Vigil’s
    partner
    organisation
    based
    in
    Zimbabwe.
    ROHR
    grew
    out
    of
    the
    need
    for
    the
    Vigil
    to
    have
    an
    organisation
    on
    the
    ground
    in
    Zimbabwe
    which
    reflected
    the
    Vigil’s
    mission
    statement
    in
    a
    practical
    way.
    ROHR
    in
    the
    UK
    actively
    fundraises
    through
    membership
    subscriptions,
    events,
    sales
    etc
    to
    support
    the
    activities
    of
    ROHR
    in
    Zimbabwe.

  • The
    Vigil’s
    book
    ‘Zimbabwe
    Emergency’
     is
    based
    on
    our
    weekly
    diaries.
    It
    records
    how
    events
    in
    Zimbabwe
    have
    unfolded
    as
    seen
    by
    the
    diaspora
    in
    the
    UK.
    It
    chronicles
    the
    economic
    disintegration,
    violence,
    growing
    oppression
    and
    political
    manoeuvring

    and
    the
    tragic
    human
    cost
    involved. It
    is
    available
    at
    the
    Vigil.
    All
    proceeds
    go
    to
    the
    Vigil
    and
    our
    sister
    organisation
    the
    Restoration
    of
    Human
    Rights
    in
    Zimbabwe’s
    work
    in
    Zimbabwe.
    The
    book
    is
    also
    available
    from
    Amazon.

  • Facebook
    pages:
                 

Vigil : https ://www.facebook.com/zimbabwevigil

ROHR: https://www.facebook.com/Restoration-of-Human-Rights-ROHR-Zimbabwe-International-370825706588551/

ZAF: https://www.facebook.com/pages/Zimbabwe-Action-Forum-ZAF/490257051027515

The
Vigil,
outside
the
Zimbabwe
Embassy,
429
Strand,
London
meets
regularly
on
Saturdays
from
14.00
to
17.00
to
protest
against
gross
violations
of
human
rights
in
Zimbabwe.
The
Vigil
which started
in
October
2002
will
continue
until
internationally-monitored,
free
and
fair
elections
are
held
in
Zimbabwe.

Post
published
in:

Featured

Biglaw Firm, Biglaw Money! Check Out This Bonus – Above the Law

Flaunt
prestige
all
you
want

what
really
matters
is
how
much
you
bring
home.
Thankfully,
you
don’t
have
to
work
at
an
Am
Law
Top
50
firm
to
make
Milbank
money!
The
most
recent
firm
to
announce
bonus
matching
is
Vinson
&
Elkins.
They
reported
$1,003,453,000
in
gross
revenue
and
profits
per
equity
partner
of
$3,646,000
in
2023
according
to
the
most
recent
Am
Law
100
ranking,
and
are
matching
the
Milbank
scale
for
both
annual
and
special
bonuses.
Here’s
the
scale.

IMG_8432

The
big
money
will
be
paid
on
or
around
January
31st.
Amazing
way
to
end
the
start
of
2025!

We
like
hearing
about
bonuses
almost
as
much
as
you
enjoy
spending
them.
As
soon
as
your
firm’s
memo
comes
out,
please email
it
to
us

(subject
line:
“[Firm
Name]
Bonus”)
or
text
us
(646-820-8477).
Please
include
the
memo
if
available.
You
can
take
a
photo
of
the
memo
and
send
it
via
text
or
email
if
you
don’t
want
to
forward
the
original
PDF
or
Word
file.

And
if
you’d
like
to
sign
up
for
ATL’s
Salary
&
Bonus
Alerts,
please
scroll
down
and
enter
your
email
address
in
the
box
below
this
post.
If
you
previously
signed
up
for
the
bonus
alerts,
you
don’t
need
to
do
anything.
You’ll
receive
an
email
notification
within
minutes
of
each
bonus
announcement
that
we
publish.



Chris
Williams
became
a
social
media
manager
and
assistant
editor
for
Above
the
Law
in
June
2021.
Prior
to
joining
the
staff,
he
moonlighted
as
a
minor
Memelord™
in
the
Facebook
group Law
School
Memes
for
Edgy
T14s
.
 He
endured
Missouri
long
enough
to
graduate
from
Washington
University
in
St.
Louis
School
of
Law.
He
is
a
former
boatbuilder
who
cannot
swim, a
published
author
on
critical
race
theory,
philosophy,
and
humor
,
and
has
a
love
for
cycling
that
occasionally
annoys
his
peers.
You
can
reach
him
by
email
at [email protected] and
by
tweet
at @WritesForRent.


Bonus Time

Enter
your
email
address
to
sign
up
for
ATL’s

Bonus
&
Salary
Increase
Alerts
.


Back When We Had Ethics Codes For High Court Justices – Above the Law


While
Justices

Alito

and

Thomas

continue
to
thumb
their
noses
at
basic
ethical
standards,
this
is
new
in
the
Anglo-American
legal
tradition
they
praise
so
highly.
In
1667,
the
Lord
Chief
Justice
of
the
King’s
Bench,
John
Kelynge,
was
forced
to
answer
a
number
of
misconduct
complaints,
including
the
use
of
what
derogatory
term
for
a
key
legal
document?


Hint:
Credit
to
Professor
Orin
Kerr
who
flagged
this
on
Twitter.



See the
answer
on
the
next
page.

Wait, Whose Checkbook Did This Former Real World Star Use To Pay For Expenses At The Ritz-Carlton? – Above the Law

Sean
Duffy
(Photo
By
Tom
Williams/CQ
Roll
Call)

Real
World
Boston
star
and
former
competitive
lumberjack
Sean
Duffy
may
have
been
dubbed
Donald
Trump’s
least
embarrassing

Cabinet
pick,
but
that’s
damning
with
faint
praise.
As
a
recap,

Duffy
got
the
nod

for
Transportation
Secretary
from
a
fellow
former
reality
TV
star
turned
politician.

Duffy,
a
graduate
of
the
William
Mitchell
College
of
Law,
began
his
career
as
a
prosecutor
before
winning
a
seat
in
the
House
of
Representatives.
In
2019
he
resigned
from
Congress
after
his
ninth
child
was
diagnosed
with
health
complications.
(Yes,
Duffy
has
9(!)
children
with
another
Real
World
alum,
Rachel
Campos-Duffy,
who,
like
her
husband,
is
off
the
far-right
deep
end

she
recently

joined
in
Nancy
Mace’s
particularly
mean-spirited
form
of
transphobia
.
Pedro
would
be
so
disappointed.)

Now
Bloomberg
Law

has
a
deep
dive

into
how
Duffy
spent
some
of
those
campaign
funds
after
he
stepped
away
from
politics.

Duffy,
a
former
GOP
congressman,
held
$2.1
million
in
his
principal
campaign
committee
as
of
Oct.
16,
money
that
he
has
drawn
on
since
leaving
office
in
2019,
according
to
a
Bloomberg
Government
analysis
of
Federal
Election
Commission
documents.
Duffy
for
Wisconsin,
his
campaign
committee,
disclosed
paying
the
Ritz-Carlton
more
than
$5,700
in
March
for
what
it
described
as
“travel,”
$2,800
in
2021,
and
$3,300
in
2020,
FEC
records
show.

Saurav
Ghosh,
director
at
the
Campaign
Legal
Center,
points
out
some
potential
issues
with
those
expenses,
“Using
campaign
funds
to
pay
for
travel
or
meals
or
various
other
charges
in
connection
with
a
campaign
or
official
duties
would
not
be
permitted
for
someone
long
after
they’ve
left
office
because
they
are
no
longer
serving
or
seeking
elected
office.
The
nexus
that’s
required
to
use
campaign
funds
simply
isn’t
there.”

Not
that
Duffy
is
the
first
to
use
former
campaign
funds
questionably.

“Former
members
of
Congress
can
use
their
excess
campaign
funds
to
make
contributions
to
candidates,
political
parties
and
non-profit
organizations,
but
they
cannot
convert
those
funds
to
personal
use,”
said
Brett
Kappel,
a
campaign
finance
lawyer
at
Harmon
Curran.
“Several
former
members
have
been
fined
by
the
FEC
for
using
excess
campaign
funds
to
pay
for
personal
travel.”

The
FEC
chided
former
Rep.
Cliff
Stearns
(R-Fla.)
for
using
his
old
campaign
funds
for
hotel
stays,
club
dues,
and
meals
and
came
to
a
“conciliation”
agreement
over
the
matter
in
2019.

And
Tiffany
Muller,
president
of
End
Citizens
United,
put
none
too
fine
a
point
on
it,
saying,
“If
Sean
Duffy
can’t
resist
the
urge
to
use
his
old
campaign
account
as
a
personal
slush
fund,
how
can
he
be
trusted
to
manage
the
Department
of
Transportation’s
budget
with
integrity?
His
judgment
is
compromised
and
his
ethics
are
questionable.”

But
the
Republican
wagons
are
circling.

Lee
Goodman,
a
former
chair
of
the
FEC
and
partner
at
the
firm
Wiley,
said
during
an
interview
arranged
by
the
Trump-Vance
transition,
that
at
least
one
of
the
Ritz-Carlton
bills
was
to
attend
a
fundraising
retreat
of
the
National
Republican
Congressional
Committee,
along
with
possibly
family
members
of
the
former
lawmaker.
He
said
that
would
be
deemed
“permissible.”

“The
dollar
figures
at
issue
here
are
not
large,
and
the
circumstances
are
all
defensible,”
Goodman
said,
adding
that
“even
if
there
were
questions
about
personal
use”
that
“I’m
certain
the
Federal
Election
Commission
would
not
pursue
enforcement
action
over
them.”

“Defensible”?
What
was
I
saying
about
faint
praise
earlier?

And
the
Trump-Vance
transition
team
spokesperson,
Karoline
Leavitt,
called
it
a
“non-story.”

Of
course,
compared
with
some
of

the
other
stories
about
other
Cabinet
nominees

this
may
not
have
the
juice
to
become
a
major
scandal.




Kathryn Rubino HeadshotKathryn
Rubino
is
a
Senior
Editor
at
Above
the
Law,
host
of

The
Jabot
podcast
,
and
co-host
of

Thinking
Like
A
Lawyer
.
AtL
tipsters
are
the
best,
so
please
connect
with
her.
Feel
free
to
email

her

with
any
tips,
questions,
or
comments
and
follow
her
on
Twitter

@Kathryn1
 or
Mastodon

@[email protected].

Alex Jones Hires New Counsel For Screaming Tantrum Phase Of Bankruptcy – Above the Law

(Photo
by
Sergio
Flores/Getty
Images)

Yesterday,
Alex
Jones’s
longtime
bankruptcy
lawyer
Vickie
Driver

noped
out

of
his
Chapter
7
case.
Jones’s
effort
to
fend
off
the
sale
of
his
company
to
The
Onion,
will
now
be
helmed
by
Shelby
Jordan,
a

bankruptcy
lawyer

from
Corpus
Christi
who
has
been
practicing
law
since
the
Nixon
administration.
And
it’s
going
AMAZING!

After
entering
his
appearance,
Jordan
immediately

filed
suit

against
the
Sandy
Hook
parents,
whom
Jones
defamed
and
called
“crisis
actors”
after
their
children
were
murdered
in
their
classroom.
The
complaint
also
named
Global
Tetrahedron,
the
parent
company
of
The
Onion,
and
the
Chapter
7
Trustee,
Christopher
Murray,
alleging
that
the
parties
colluded
to
steal
Jones’s
IP
and
thwart
the
bid
of
Jones’s
buddies
at
First
United
American
Companies
LLC
(FUAC).
Jordan,
who
is,
again,

not
new
here
,
seems
blissfully
unaware
of the Barton doctrine,
which
bars
suits
against
a
bankruptcy
trustee
without
leave
of
the
court.

Jones
demanded
a
TRO,
claiming
that
Murray
and
The
Onion
had
fired
all
the
employees,
looted
the
business,
and
directed
the
company’s
website
to
The
Onion’s
servers.
He
followed
that
up
with
a
promise
to
challenge
the
non-dischargeability
ruling
from
October
of
2023,
in
which
the
court
found
that
most
of
the
debts
would
survive
bankruptcy
because
they
were
incurred
as
the
result
of
defamation,
a
willful
tort.

FUAC
filed
its
own

motion
to
disqualify

the
Onion
bid,
alleging
gross
misconduct
by
Murray,
prompting
a
furious
response
from
Murray
threatening
to
move
for
Rule
11
sanctions.

At
a

hearing

on
November
14,
Judge
Christopher
Lopez
appeared
alarmed
at
the
structure
of
the
auction,
in
which
one
group
of
creditors
disclaimed
enough
of
its
share
to
make
the
others
materially
better
off,
even
under
The
Onion’s
lower
cash
bid.
But
at
yesterday’s
hearing
on
the
TRO,
after
having
digested
the
pleadings,
the
judge
was
back
to
status
quo
ante

audibly
exhausted
by
Jones’s
shenanigans
and
his
lawyers’
bad
faith
histrionics.

Jordan
spent
several
minutes
attacking
the
underlying
state
judgments,
droning
on
about
the NYT
v.
Sullivan

standard
and
the
First
Amendment,
apparently
under
the
impression
that
bankruptcy
judges
give
a
shit
about
that.
He
also
made
bizarre
claims
that
the
Sandy
Hook
parents
should
be
disqualified
as
bidders
because
their
motives
were
to
shut
Jones
and
up
and
make
their
own
debt
uncollectible.

“We
will
not
be
inquiring
into
the
motives
of
bidders,”
Judge
Lopez
sighed.

But
Jordan
was
still
going!
He
still
had
to
get
through
his
allegations
about
Murray
and
The
Onion
cahootsing
to
knock
Infowars
offline.

Reading
the
rancid
goat
entrails,
it
would
appear
that
Jones’s
legal
defense
fund
on
GiveSendGo
got
DDOS-ed
or

something?

Jordan
did
finally
concede
that
the
Infowars
site
had
been
operational
all
week
with
Jones
at
its
helm
spewing
his
regularly
scheduled
bile.

“Mr.
Jordan,
I’m
not
sure
what
I’m
being
asked
to
restrain,”
Judge
Lopez
broke
in
eventually.

“At
this
point,
I’m
not
sure
anything,”
Jordan
conceded,
while
mumbling
that,
absent
injunctive
relief,
there
was
nothing
to
stop
Murray
and
the
evil
allium
from
taking
Infowars
offline
again.

At
the
end
of
the
hearing,
Judge
Lopez
denied
the
TRO.
He
seemed
wholly
disinclined
to
engage
with
Jones
and
FUAC’s
demands
to
preemptively
halt
the
sale,
and
ordered
an
evidentiary
hearing
in
the
first
week
of
December
to
determine
whether
the
bid
should
be
ratified.
He
also
pointed
out
at
length
that
motions
for
reconsideration
filed
upwards
of
a
year
after
ruling
face
an
exceedingly
high
barrier
that
cannot
by
overcome
by
hinting
darkly
at
the
“motives”
of
the
creditor.
Toward
that
end,
he
greenlit
a
deposition
of
Murray,
but
not
of
The
Onion
or
the
Sandy
Hook
families
to
delve
into
their
sinister
motives.

And,
to
top
it
all
off,
Jones’s
screeching
that
Elon
Musk
was

riding
to
his
rescue

took
yet
another
hit
as
X
Corp.

stated

once
again
for
the
record
that
it
“does
not
object
to
the
proposed
sale
as
a
general
matter”
and
its

only

interest
here
is
whether
Ex-Twitter
handles
can
be
sold.

All
in
all,
it
was
a
total
loss
for
Jones
and
FUAC

not
that
you’d
know
it
from
listening
to
his
show.


Alexander
E.
Jones
and
Official
Committee
Of
Unsecured
Creditors 
[Docket
via
Court
Listener]





Liz
Dye
 lives
in
Baltimore
where
she
produces
the
Law
and
Chaos substack and podcast.

Becoming A T-Shaped Lawyer: Why In-House Lawyers Should Embrace This Framework – Above the Law

The
legal
world
is
rapidly
evolving,
and
staying
ahead
requires
more
than
just
traditional
legal
skills.
In
a
recent
discussion
with
Peter
Connor,
founder
&
CEO
of
AlternativelyLegal,
we
explored
his
innovative
concept
of
the
T-Shaped
Lawyer

a
framework
that
could
redefine
success
and
effectiveness
for
in-house
lawyers.
Peter’s
insights
offer
a
roadmap
for
becoming
a
more
versatile
and
valuable
legal
professional
in
an
increasingly
complex
corporate
environment.

Here
are
three
key
takeaways
from
our
conversation
that
highlight
why
embracing
the
T-Shaped
Lawyer
framework
is
crucial
for
today’s
legal
professionals.

1.

Understanding
The
T-Shaped
Lawyer:
It’s
More
Than
Just
Skills

The
T-Shaped
Lawyer
is
a
concept
borrowed
from
other
professional
fields
but
tailored
specifically
for
legal
professionals.
At
its
core,
this
framework
is
about
combining
deep
legal
expertise
(the
vertical
part
of
the
T)
with
a
broad
set
of
business
and
interpersonal
skills
(the
horizontal
part
of
the
T).

According
to
Peter,
a
T-Shaped
Lawyer
is
not
just
someone
who
knows
the
law
well
but
is
also
a
business
person
who
provides
business
input
and
advice
and
engages
in
business
work,
not
just
legal
work.
This
distinction
is
crucial
because
it
shifts
the
lawyer’s
role
from
being
solely
a
legal
advisor
to
becoming
a
strategic
partner
in
the
business.
This
approach
helps
lawyers
add
more
value
to
their
organizations
by
understanding
and
influencing
broader
business
objectives.

2.

The
Importance
Of
Business
Partnering
And
Leadership

Peter
introduces
two
critical
components
of
the
T-Shaped
Lawyer
framework:
business
partnering
and
business
leadership.


  • Business
    Partnering
    :
    This
    involves
    providing
    business
    advice
    and
    input
    in
    addition
    to
    legal
    guidance.
    It’s
    about
    being
    proactive
    in
    identifying
    business
    risks,
    suggesting
    improvements,
    and
    helping
    clients
    achieve
    their
    goals.
    This
    can
    be
    done
    informally
    and
    quickly,
    making
    it
    accessible
    to
    all
    lawyers,
    regardless
    of
    their
    seniority.

  • Business
    Leadership
    :
    This
    is
    about
    taking
    on
    roles
    that
    influence
    broader
    business
    strategies.
    It
    involves
    identifying
    systemic
    problems
    within
    the
    organization,
    driving
    cross-functional
    collaboration,
    and
    leading
    projects
    that
    enhance
    the
    company’s
    operations
    and
    outcomes.
    Unlike
    business
    partnering,
    which
    is
    more
    immediate,
    business
    leadership
    requires
    a
    longer-term
    commitment
    and
    deeper
    engagement
    with
    business
    objectives.

By
engaging
in
both
business
partnering
and
leadership,
lawyers
can
transition
from
being
reactive
problem
solvers
to
proactive
business
leaders
who
drive
value
across
their
organizations.

3.

Why
Embrace
The
T-Shaped
Lawyer
Framework?

The
corporate
world
is
experiencing
what
Peter
describes
as
“discontinuous
change,”
where
past
experiences
no
longer
serve
as
reliable
predictors
of
the
future.
In
this
context,
lawyers
who
are
strictly
legal
experts
risk
becoming
obsolete
as
technologies
like
generative
AI
increasingly
automate
routine
legal
tasks.

The
T-Shaped
Lawyer
framework
offers
a
pathway
to
stay
relevant
and
thrive
amid
these
changes.
By
developing
a
broader
skill
set
that
includes
business
acumen,
leadership
abilities,
and
technological
savvy,
lawyers
can
enhance
their
adaptability
and
resilience.
This
not
only
makes
them
more
valuable
to
their
current
organizations
but
also
better
prepares
them
for
future
roles
in
a
rapidly
changing
legal
landscape.


Taking
The
First
Steps
To
Becoming
A
T-Shaped
Lawyer

Peter
suggests
several
practical
steps
for
lawyers
at
different
stages
of
their
careers:


  • Junior
    Lawyers.

    Start
    by
    adopting
    a
    businessperson
    mindset.
    Understand
    your
    organization’s
    business
    model,
    goals,
    and
    challenges.
    Begin
    practicing
    business
    partnering
    by
    giving
    business-oriented
    advice
    alongside
    your
    legal
    guidance.

  • Mid-Career
    Lawyers.

    Engage
    in
    internal
    business
    work
    by
    supporting
    legal
    operations
    and
    identifying
    opportunities
    for
    process
    improvements.
    Begin
    exploring
    business
    leadership
    by
    taking
    on
    projects
    that
    have
    a
    broader
    impact
    on
    the
    organization.

  • Senior
    Lawyers.

    Focus
    on
    strategic
    business
    leadership.
    Lead
    cross-functional
    teams,
    drive
    business
    initiatives,
    and
    mentor
    junior
    lawyers
    in
    developing
    a
    T-shaped
    skill
    set.


Final
Thoughts

The
T-Shaped
Lawyer
framework
is
more
than
a
buzzword;
it’s
a
strategic
approach
to
legal
practice
that
aligns
legal
expertise
with
business
needs.
By
embracing
this
framework,
lawyers
can
enhance
their
career
prospects,
add
significant
value
to
their
organizations,
and
become
indispensable
business
leaders.

Whether
you’re
just
starting
your
career
or
are
a
seasoned
in-house
lawyer,
adopting
a
T-shaped
approach
can
help
you
navigate
the
complexities
of
today’s
corporate
environment
and
prepare
for
the
future
of
law.
For
more
insights
on
becoming
a
T-Shaped
Lawyer
and
advancing
your
career,
don’t
miss
our
full
episode
with
Peter
Connor.




Olga MackOlga
V.
Mack



is
a
Fellow
at
CodeX,
The
Stanford
Center
for
Legal
Informatics,
and
a
Generative
AI
Editor
at
law.MIT.
Olga
embraces
legal
innovation
and
had
dedicated
her
career
to
improving
and
shaping
the
future
of
law.
She
is
convinced
that
the
legal
profession
will
emerge
even
stronger,
more
resilient,
and
more
inclusive
than
before
by
embracing
technology.
Olga
is
also
an
award-winning
general
counsel,
operations
professional,
startup
advisor,
public
speaker,
adjunct
professor,
and
entrepreneur.
She
authored 
Get
on
Board:
Earning
Your
Ticket
to
a
Corporate
Board
Seat
Fundamentals
of
Smart
Contract
Security
,
and  
Blockchain
Value:
Transforming
Business
Models,
Society,
and
Communities
. She
is
working
on
three
books:



Visual
IQ
for
Lawyers
(ABA
2024), The
Rise
of
Product
Lawyers:
An
Analytical
Framework
to
Systematically
Advise
Your
Clients
Throughout
the
Product
Lifecycle
(Globe
Law
and
Business
2024),
and
Legal
Operations
in
the
Age
of
AI
and
Data
(Globe
Law
and
Business
2024).
You
can
follow
Olga
on




LinkedIn



and
Twitter
@olgavmack.