The ‘Unnatural’ Interest In Law School – Above the Law



Ed.
Note:

Welcome
to
our
daily
feature

Trivia
Question
of
the
Day!


According
to
the
Law
School
Admission
Council’s latest
figures
applications
to
law
schools
are
up
by
what
percentage
over
last
year’s
admissions
cycle?


Hint:
Law
school
admissions
consultant
Mike
Spivey
of
Spivey
Consulting
says,
“It’s
unnatural.
Demographically,
there
are
no
more
college
students
graduating
this
year
than
there
were
last
year.”



See
the
answer
on
the
next
page.

Should We Be Expecting A ‘Wave’ Of Biglaw Partner De-Equitizations In 2025? – Above the Law

‘Stay
away
from
my
equity!’



Ed.
note
:
Welcome
to
our
daily
feature,

Quote
of
the
Day
.


This
trend
isn’t
over.
I
think
it
will
continue,
at
least
in
a
trickle,
if
not
a
wave.
It’s
a
way
for
firms
to
save
a
lot
of
money.


2025
is
shaping
up
to
likely
be
a
busy
year
at
firms,
[but]
even
given
that,
firms
will
forever
try
to
protect
their
profit
per
equity
partner,
and
so
I
don’t
think
we’re
done
with
partners
losing
their
equity
if
their
books
have
shrunk
or
they’re
billing
fewer
hours.




Kate
Reder
Sheikh,
a
recruiter
at
Major,
Lindsey
&
Africa,
in
comments
given
to
the

American
Lawyer
,
on
the
partner
pay
cuts
and
de-equitizations
that
have
now
become
routine
within
Biglaw.



Staci ZaretskyStaci
Zaretsky
 is
a
senior
editor
at
Above
the
Law,
where
she’s
worked
since
2011.
She’d
love
to
hear
from
you,
so
please
feel
free
to

email

her
with
any
tips,
questions,
comments,
or
critiques.
You
can
follow
her
on BlueskyX/Twitter,
and Threads, or
connect
with
her
on LinkedIn.

How Appealing Weekly Roundup – Above the Law

(Image
via
Getty)




Ed.
Note
:

A
weekly
roundup
of
just
a
few
items
from
Howard
Bashman’s

How
Appealing
blog
,
the
Web’s
first
blog
devoted
to
appellate
litigation.
Check
out
these
stories
and
more
at
How
Appealing.


“Biden
Team
Considers
Blanket
Pardons
Before
Trump’s
Promised
‘Retribution’;
White
House
officials
believe
President-elect
Donald
J.
Trump’s
selection
of
partisan
warriors
for
top
law
enforcement
jobs
indicates
that
he
will
pursue
revenge
against
his
perceived
enemies”:
 Peter
Baker
and
Erica
L.
Green
of
The
New
York
Times
have this
report
.


“Don’t
Mistake
Neil
Gorsuch’s
Abrupt
Recusal
for
Actual
Ethics”:
 Mark
Joseph
Stern
has this
Jurisprudence
essay
 online
at
Slate.


“Act
10
could
take
center
stage
in
upcoming
state
Supreme
Court
election”:
 Laura
Schulte
of
The
Milwaukee
Journal
Sentinel
has this
report
.


“SCOTUS
Clerk
Hiring
Watch:
Retirement
Clues?
Here’s
more
reason
to
think
that
Justices
Thomas
and
Alito
aren’t
stepping
down,
at
least
for
the
time
being.”
 David
Lat
has this
post
 at
his
“Original
Jurisdiction”
Substack
site.


“Inside
the
Supreme
Court
arguments
on
transgender
care”:
 Mark
Walsh
has this
View
from
the
Court
post
 at
“SCOTUSblog.”


“Theory
in
Practice:
At
the
Center
of
a
Supreme
Court
Case;
William
Baude’s
Interpretation
of
the
Fourteenth
Amendment
in
Trump
v.
Anderson
Made
Headlines

And
He
Stands
by
His
Argument.”
 Claire
L.
Parins
of
the
University
of
Chicago
Law
School
has this
report
.

Stat(s) Of The Week: Talkin’ Bout AI Revolution – Above the Law


“The
AI
revolution
is
here,”
proclaims
a
new
study
released
by
International
Data
Corporation,
noting
that
“organizations
will
need
to
adapt
to
survive.”


The
report,
Generative
AI
in
Legal
2024
,”
is
based
on
a
survey
of
300
legal
professionals
to
examine
how
they
are
incorporating
generative
AI
into
their
daily
activities.


According
to
the
report,
which
was
commissioned
by
Relativity
and
conducted
by
IDC,
half
of
legal
professionals
have
increased
their
use
of
AI
generally
in
the
last
two
years,
and
69%
expect
their
use
of
generative
AI
specifically
to
grow
within
the
next
two
years.
Toward
that
end,
73%
of
organizations
are
taking
steps
to
develop
technical
proficiencies
with
GenAI.


While
contract
analysis
and
legal
research
are
currently
the
areas
with
the
highest
GenAI
usage,
document
review
is
the
area
in
which
the
most
growth
is
anticipated.
It
is
also
the
task
legal
professionals
are
most
willing
to
entrust
to
GenAI,
with
89%
of
respondents
describing
themselves
as
“very
comfortable”
or
“somewhat
comfortable”
using
generative
AI
for
document
review.



New
Research
Study
Predicts
Continued
Growth
for
Generative
AI
in
Legal

[Law.com]


Generative
AI
in
Legal
2024

[Relativity]

The Balancing Act: Life As Part Of The Sandwich Generation  – Above the Law


Ed.
note
:
This
is
the
latest
installment
in
a
series
of
posts
on
motherhood
in
the
legal
profession,
in
partnership
with
our
friends
at 
MothersEsquire.
Welcome
Randi
Johnson
to
our
pages.
Click



here


if
you’d
like
to
donate
to
MothersEsquire.

Navigating
a
typical
day
often
feels
like
riding
a
double
century
in
a
single
day
(200
miles
on
a
bike)!
As
a
chief
engagement
officer,
principal,
managing
and
practicing
attorney
with
Gravis
Law,
the
demands
of
my
professional
life
are
unyielding.
They
don’t
pause
when
I
step
through
my
front
door.
Home
is
another
lively
scene,
with
two
energetic
young
girls
who
depend
on
me
to
be
their
personal
Uber,
shuttling
them
between
sports
practices
and
Girl
Scout
meetings.
On
top
of
this,
there’s
the
looming
prospect
of
caring
for
my
aging
parents,
who
are
just
beginning
to
show
signs
that
they’ll
soon
need
more
support.


Morning
Rush
And
Legal
Lunches

Mornings
are
meticulously
choreographed,
starting
with
the
breakfast
chaos
and
school
drop
offs,
then
shifting
to
a
day
packed
with
constant
meetings,
court
appearances,
and
inbox
overflowing
with
new
emails.
Lunches
are
often
brief
and
functional,
used
to
catch
up
on
emails
or
prepare
for
afternoon
sessions.
This
juggling
act
isn’t
just
about
keeping
up
with
the
workload;
it’s
about
staying
mentally
agile
and
ready
to
switch
gears
between
my
professional
responsibilities
and
parental
responsibilities.


Afternoons
Of
Advocacy
And
Activities

I
can
feel
the
role
shift
as
the
school
day
ends.
My
afternoons
transform
into
a
balancing
act
of
attending
to
parental
duties
alongside
professional
obligations.
During
these
times,
whether
I’m
cheering
from
the
bleachers
of
a
swim
meet
or
quietly
observing
a
gymnastics
practice,
I
ponder
the
overlap
in
skills
required
for
parenting
and
practicing
law.
Both
roles
demand
emotional
intelligence
to
navigate
complex
situations,
adaptability
to
respond
to
unexpected
challenges,
and
the
ability
to
balance
competing
priorities
while
maintaining
a
clear
sense
of
purpose.
These
moments
are
also
critical
for
mentally
regrouping
and
preparing
for
the
evening
routine.


Evolving
Family
Needs

The
demands
of
these
roles
are
just
the
beginning;
I
know
significant
changes
are
on
the
horizon.
My
parents
pride
themselves
on
their
independence,
yet
the
realization
that
I
will
soon
need
to
add
caregiving
to
my
already
packed
schedule
is
stark.
As
I
reflect
on
this
shift,
I
think
about
how
to
integrate
caregiving
in
a
way
that
honors
their
autonomy
while
ensuring
they
receive
the
support
they
need.
This
puts
me
squarely
in
the
middle
of
the
“sandwich
generation.”


Strategic
Planning
For
Elder
Care

To
manage
this
impending
shift,
I’ve
begun
proactive
discussions
with
my
parents
about
their
future
needs,
covering
everything
from
living
arrangements
to
health
care
and
important
legal
matters
such
as
establishing
powers
of
attorney.
While
these
conversations
are
tough,
they
are
crucial
for
avoiding
future
emergencies.
This
approach
not
only
helps
me
manage
my
anxiety
about
future
changes
but
also
gives
me
a
structured
plan
to
adapt
to
their
needs.


Delegation
And
Time
Management

A
key
strategy
in
getting
things
done
with
my
sanity
intact
is
to
delegate
more
at
work
and
home.
My
legal
and
operations
teams
are
empowered
to
take
responsible
action
toward
our
goals
and
objectives.
At
home,
the
family
divides
chores,
and
I
hired
a
nanny
in
the
afternoons
four
days
a
week
to
assist
with
sports,
homework,
and
making
healthy
snacks.
These
changes
make
our
home
more
cooperative
and
supportive.
I
was
able
to
find
some
time
for
myself
to
exercise,
engage
in
hobbies,
visit
friends,
or
just
sit
quietly.


Support
Networks
Matter

I
couldn’t
manage
this
alone.
Building
a
support
network
is
essential.
Connecting
with
colleagues
who
understand
the
pressures
of
legal
work
and
other
parents
navigating
similar
life
stages
provides
a
necessary
support
system.
These
connections
offer
practical
advice
and
emotional
comfort.


Navigating
Challenges
With
Resilience

Each
day
is
filled
with
opportunities
for
personal
development.
The
resilience
I
build
through
managing
these
complex
life
layers

professional,
parental,
and
soon
caregiver

prepares
me
to
tackle
difficulties
and
to
excel
amidst
them.
It’s
about
harnessing
these
challenges,
finding
opportunities
to
thrive,
and
ensuring
each
family
member
and
I
feel
supported
and
valued.


Reflections
And
Future
Outlook

Looking
ahead,
these
skills
become
even
more
crucial.
The
coming
transitions
require
adaptability,
clear
communication,
and
firm
boundaries
to
protect
my
well-being.
Despite
the
demanding
nature
of
this
journey,
it
is
replete
with
enriching
moments
that
bring
our
family
closer
together,
underscoring
the
value
of
every
minute
spent
with
loved
ones.


Advice
For
Others
In
The
Sandwich
Generation

For
those
navigating
similar
paths,
remember
that
proactive
planning,
building
support
networks,
and
being
willing
to
adapt
are
essential.
Create
systems
at
home
and
work
to
stay
organized
and
to
allow
yourself
grace.
Embrace
available
support
systems,
keep
communication
with
your
family
open,
and
recognize
your
capacity
to
manage
these
multifaceted
roles
effectively.

Through
a
blend
of
professional
rigor
and
personal
commitment,
the
journey
through
parenting,
lawyering,
and
caregiving
becomes
manageable
and
profoundly
meaningful,
filled
with
lessons
about
endurance,
compassion,
and
the
lasting
strength
of
family
bonds.




Randi
Johnson
is
a
confident
and
accomplished
professional,
committed
to
public
service,
community
engagement,
and
defending
joy
in
all
places.
Randi’s
entry
into
the
legal
industry
was
driven
by
her
desire
to
contribute
and
help
others.
She
guides
her
clients
by
presenting
legal
options,
empowering
them
to
make
informed
decisions.  



After
successfully
building
her
own
law
firm,
Randi’s
passion
for
the
business
side
of
legal
services
led
her
to
Gravis
Law,
where
she
now
serves
as
the
Chief
Engagement
Officer,
assisting
talented
attorneys
in
building
their
practices
and
leading
marketing
and
communications.



Randi
is
a
dedicated
servant
leader
who
actively
serves
on
the
Board
of
Directors
for
the
WA
State
Developmental
Disabilities
Endowment
Trust
Fund
(a
governmental
appointment)
and
MothersEsquire.
She
has
previously
served
on
the
boards
of
the
National
Association
of
Women
Business
Owners

NW
Chapter
and
the
Girl
Scouts
of
Eastern
Washington
and
Northern
Idaho,
where
she
was
also
an
Executive
Committee
Member.
Randi
is
a
proud
Girl
Scout
Troop
Leader,
a
founding
member
and
Active
Chair
of
ConnectHER
Idaho,
and
the
Co-Founder
of
the
Spokane/CDA
Area
Ladies
Networking
Group
(LadyBoss),
where
she
continues
to
inspire
and
empower
women
in
their
professional
journeys.

LinkedIn Mastery For Lawyers: 5 Simple Strategies To Elevate Your Brand And Build Engagement – Above the Law

When
I
first
ventured
onto
LinkedIn
in
2007,
I
could
already
see
its
potential
as
a
game-changer
for
professional
networking
and
business
development.
Fast
forward
to
today,
and
LinkedIn
has
become
an
indispensable
tool
for
lawyers
looking
to
build
their
brand
and
connect
with
clients.
Yet,
many
attorneys
are
either
unsure
how
to
get
started
or
struggle
to
maintain
consistency.

The
truth
is,
LinkedIn
doesn’t
have
to
be
daunting.
By
using
just
a
handful
of
simple
posting
strategies,
you
can
maximize
your
visibility,
showcase
your
expertise,
and
stay
top
of
mind
with
your
network.
Whether
you’re
new
to
LinkedIn
or
looking
to
refresh
your
approach,
the
following
five
strategies
are
designed
to
help
you
get
real
results
with
minimal
effort.


  1. Share
    Content
    With
    Insights

You
don’t
need
to
create
original
content
to
have
an
impact.
Sharing
relevant
articles,
updates,
or
research
from
others

with
your
own
commentary

can
demonstrate
your
expertise
and
engage
your
audience.
For
example,
if
you’re
an
estate-planning
attorney
and
new
tax
laws
are
announced,
share
an
article
about
the
changes
and
explain
what
it
means
for
your
audience.
Tools
like
Google
Alerts
or
RSS
feeds
can
help
you
stay
on
top
of
trending
topics.
By
being
one
of
the
first
to
comment
on
important
news,
you
position
yourself
as
a
thought
leader
without
needing
to
write
the
news
yourself.


  1. Share
    Personal
    Stories
    With
    A
    Business
    Connection

People
love
authentic,
relatable
content.
Sharing
a
personal
anecdote
and
connecting
it
back
to
your
work
is
a
great
way
to
build
trust
and
show
your
human
side.
For
instance,
I
often
share
stories
about
fishing
trips
with
my
son,
tying
them
back
to
lessons
in
business
development.
One
of
my
clients
once
posted
about
the
inefficiency
of
using
Latin
in
legal
writing.
While
it
seemed
risky,
it
sparked
a
lively
conversation
with
over
10,000
views
and
100
comments.
Even
disagreements
can
add
value
by
engaging
your
audience
in
thoughtful
discussions.


  1. Use
    Polls
    To
    Engage
    And
    Inform

LinkedIn’s
poll
feature
is
an
easy
way
to
spark
engagement
and
gather
insights.
Create
a
poll
with
an
interesting
or
provocative
question
related
to
your
field.
For
example,
I
recently
asked,
“How
effective
are
you
at
using
LinkedIn
to
build
your
brand
or
drive
business?”
The
responses
provided
valuable
insights

and
even
inspired
a
follow-up
post
analyzing
the
results.
Polls
not
only
engage
your
audience
but
also
help
you
understand
their
perspectives,
giving
you
material
for
future
content.


  1. Create
    Short,
    Informative
    Videos

Video
content
is
one
of
the
most
effective
ways
to
capture
attention
online.
While
it
may
seem
intimidating,
creating
videos
can
be
surprisingly
easy.
Start
by
listing
five
to
10
questions
you’re
frequently
asked
about
your
area
of
law.
Answer
those
questions
while
recording
yourself
on
smartphone
or
Zoom.
In
less
than
an
hour,
you
can
create
enough
content
for
weeks
of
posts.
If
you
want
polished
results,
consider
hiring
a
professional
editor
or
exploring
user-friendly
editing
apps.


  1. Repost
    Content
    To
    Build
    Relationships

Reposting
someone
else’s
content
is
a
quick
and
effective
way
to
create
meaningful
connections.
When
you
find
a
post
you
resonate
with,
share
it
along
with
your
own
thoughts.
Be
sure
to
tag
and
thank
the
original
poster.
Not
only
does
this
create
unique
content
for
your
audience,
but
it
also
strengthens
your
relationship
with
the
author.
To
make
this
strategy
even
more
effective,
use
LinkedIn’s
notification
feature
(the
little
bell
on
a
person’s
profile)
to
stay
updated
on
posts
from
potential
clients
or
strategic
partners.
Regular
engagement
can
open
doors
to
conversations
and
collaborations.

If
you’ve
been
putting
off
LinkedIn
or
feeling
overwhelmed
by
where
to
begin,
remember
this:
small,
consistent
efforts
can
make
a
big
difference.
By
adopting
even
one
or
two
of
these
strategies,
you’ll
be
well
on
your
way
to
creating
a
LinkedIn
presence
that
attracts
clients
and
builds
relationships.
The
key
is
to
start
where
you’re
comfortable,
experiment
with
different
approaches,
and
stay
consistent.
LinkedIn
isn’t
just
a
platform

it’s
a
powerful
tool
for
taking
your
legal
career
to
the
next
level.




Steve
Fretzin
is
a
bestselling
author,
host
of
the
BE
THAT
LAWYER
Podcast,
and
business
development
coach
exclusively
for
attorneys.
Steve
has
committed
his
career
to
helping
lawyers
learn
key
growth
skills
not
currently
taught
in
law
school.
His
clients
soon
become
top
rainmakers
and
credit
Steve’s
program
and
coaching
for
their
success.
He
can
be
reached
directly
by
email
at 
[email protected].
Or
you
can
easily
find
him
on
his
website
at 
www.fretzin.com or
LinkedIn
at 
https://www.linkedin.com/in/stevefretzin/. 

Will Protesting Cost Students Their Ability To Practice Law? California Shrugs Off A Clear Answer – Above the Law

What
should
I
do?
(Image
via
Getty)

Picture
this.
You’re
a
law
student
who
went
to
school
with
the
sole
purpose
of
using
your
degree
to
represent
people
who’ve
suffered
civil
rights
violations.
You
don’t
come
from
a
family
of
lawyers
like
many
members
of
your
cohort.
You
were
inspired
to
protect
the
rule
of
law
because
your
uncle
was
beaten
by
4
officers
for
jaywalking
on
a
quiet
street.
He
had
a
strong
case
but
he
couldn’t
afford
a
lawyer
because
the
financial
hardship
ushered
in
because
he
couldn’t
work
after
police
fractured
his
collarbone
and
femur
really
put
a
dent
in
the
family’s
finances.
Your
hope
is
that
if
and
when
this
happens
to
someone
else,
you
can
be
there
to
represent
them
and
their
family,
even
if
the
only
thing
they
can
pay
you
in
is
appreciation.

It
is
2024
and
police
brutality
is
being
widely
protested.
The
names
of
people
killed
by
the
police
fill
the
air
like
the
COVID
we
all
ignore:

Kiyln
Lewis
,

Sonya
Massey
,

Robert
Jones
.
With
each
new
name,
underlined
portions
of
your
Constitutional
and
Criminal
Law
outlines
feel
more
real.
You
realize
that
you
are
specially
positioned
to
join
in
the
campus
protests.
Not
only
because
you
see
what
could
have
been
your
uncle
in
each
of
the
names
the
protestors
chant,
but
because
you
want
to
be
there
on
the
scene
to
name
everyone’s
rights
if
the
police
decide
to
respond
to
protected
activity

with
gas
canisters
.

Unfortunately,
there’s
a
looming
question:
will
attending
this
protest
jeopardize
your
entire
reason
for
going
to
law
school?

If
you’re
living
in
California,
it
depends.

Reuters

has
coverage:

Bar
admission
authorities
in
California
will
consider
applicants’
participation
in
campus
protests
on
an
“individual
basis”
during
the
moral
character
process,
following
an
internal
review.

The
working
group
declined
to
endorse
any
blanket
policies
regarding
campus
protest
involvement,
instead
concluding
that
moral
character
reviews
should
look
at
the
“specific
facts
relevant
to
the
individual
applicant”
and
take
into
account
relevant
state
and
federal
precedent.

Do
you
risk
it?
What
if
you
went
to
school
to
litigate
on
behalf
of
ANWR
and

wanted
to
join
a
protest
against
law
firms
playing
a
role
in
exacerbating
climate
change
?
What
if
you
were
caught
protesting
genocidal
conditions
in
Darfur?
In
Gaza?
Even
if
your
actions
during
the
protest
fit
squarely
in
the
protected
by
the
First
Amendment
box,
would
knowing
that
your
evaluators
will
be
looking
to
the
“specific
facts
relevant
to
the
individual
applicant”
give
you
any
sense
of
security?
Probably
not;

if
studying
in
a
library
and
prayer
at
a
seminary
can
be
labeled
disruptive
,
there
are
no
real
parameters
on
what
degree
of
voicing
discontent
is
fair
game.

It
may
comfort
the
Bar
to
lean
on
flexible
judgement
criteria,
but
students
have
their
future
careers
at
stake.
They
deserve
something
more
concrete
than
dressing
up
a
maybe
by
saying
“everyone
will
be
evaluated
on
an
individual
basis.”


Calif
Bar
Considers
Campus
Protests
In
Moral
Character
Review
For
Lawyer
Licensing

[Reuters]



Chris
Williams
became
a
social
media
manager
and
assistant
editor
for
Above
the
Law
in
June
2021.
Prior
to
joining
the
staff,
he
moonlighted
as
a
minor
Memelord™
in
the
Facebook
group Law
School
Memes
for
Edgy
T14s
.
 He
endured
Missouri
long
enough
to
graduate
from
Washington
University
in
St.
Louis
School
of
Law.
He
is
a
former
boatbuilder
who
cannot
swim, a
published
author
on
critical
race
theory,
philosophy,
and
humor
,
and
has
a
love
for
cycling
that
occasionally
annoys
his
peers.
You
can
reach
him
by
email
at [email protected] and
by
tweet
at @WritesForRent.

Biglaw Associate Fired For Denouncing Gaza Bombing Loses Key Part Of Lawsuit – Above the Law

Jinan
Chehade
moved
to
Chicago
to
begin
her
new
job
as
a
Foley
&
Lardner
associate,
but
the
firm

abruptly
revoked
her
offer

following
public
statements
she
made
over
the
situation
in
Gaza.
After
Chehade
spoke
publicly
at
a
rally,
both
denouncing
the
October
7
Hamas
attacks
while
blaming
Israeli
government
policy
for
the
conditions
that
motivated
the
violence,
the
firm
called
her
in
to
grill
her
over
her
past
comments
and
affiliations.
Foley
would
revoke
her
offer
the
day
before
she
was
set
to
start.
She
then
sued
the
firm
on
a
number
of
grounds,
including
a
claim
that
the
firm
should
be
held
accountable
for
backing
out
of
its
promised
job
offer.

Yesterday,

the
court
dismissed
this
claim
without
prejudice

and
gave
her
an
opportunity
to
amend.
Her
civil
rights
claims
remain.

In
the
immediate
aftermath
of
October
7,
more
than
a
few
lawyers
faced
career
consequences
for
speaking
out
about
the
situation.
That
said,
the
range
of
comments
eliciting
dismissals
varied
wildly.
A
future
Winston
associate
lost
their
job
for

characterizing
the
attacks
as
“necessary,”

while
Davis
Polk
revoked
offers
to
students
just
for
belonging
to
groups
that

placed
ultimate
responsibility
for
the
crisis
on
Israeli
government
policy
while
denouncing
the
Hamas
attacks
specifically
.
Sullivan
&
Cromwell
pledged
to

conduct
background
checks

to
root
out
applicants
involved
in
the
campus
protests
of
the
subsequent
humanitarian
crisis.
Other
firms
signed
a
letter
blaming
law
schools —
a

deeply
cynical
stunt
that
made
a
mockery
of
the
very
real
problem
of
rising
antisemitism
in
this
country


prompting
a
thoughtful
response
by
a
Sidley
associate
explaining
that
antisemitism
and
critiquing
Israeli
government
policy
are
two
very
different
things
that
firms
should
not
casually
conflate.

So
she
got
fired
.

These
responses
are
all
within
the
rights
of
the
firms.
They’re
at
will
employers
and
they’re
under
no
obligation
to
employ
someone
whose
speech
they
disagree
with.
While
there
may
be
substantial
daylight
between
calling
terrorism
“necessary”
and
joining
a
protest
over
an
ongoing
humanitarian
crisis,
firms
don’t
to
need
to
justify
where
they
choose
to
draw
the
line.

Which
is
what
Judge
Sharon
Johnson
Coleman
confirmed
in
Chehade’s
case:

Plaintiff
offers
no
evidence
to
support
a
finding
that
Defendant’s
promise
of
support
was
an
unambiguous
promise
to
not
penalize
Plaintiff
for
any
actions
she
took
as
long
as
she
believed
they
were
in
support
of
her
Arab
Muslim
heritage.
To
conclude
otherwise
would
mean
that
Plaintiff
would
have
a
“get
out
of
jail
free
card”
for
any
action
that
she
took,
even
if
it
violated
Defendant’s
values
and
policies,
due
to
her
status
as
an
Arab
Muslim
woman.

While
the
promissory
estoppel
claim
failed,
Chehade’s
civil
rights
claims
survive.
In
the
complaint,
Chehade
alleged
that
the
firm
spent
time
grilling
her
about
her
father’s
job
with
a
mosque,
an
allegation
that,
if
true,
suggests
Foley’s
decision
was
at
least
somewhat
contingent
on
her
racial
and
religious
background
as
opposed
to
the
four
corners
of
any
specific
statement.
Once
a
conversation
with
human
resources
gets
into
status
as
a
Muslim
it
raises
entirely
different
issues
than
just
separating
the
firm
from
discourse
it
doesn’t
like.

For
now,
Chehade
has
21
days
to
replead
the
promissory
estoppel
claim
if
she
wants.
Otherwise,
the
case
marches
on
with
the
civil
rights
claims.


Earlier
:

Biglaw
Firm
Sued
For
Revoking
Offer
To
Arab-American
Who
Condemned
Gaza
Bombing


Davis
Polk
Rescinds
Offers
To
T14
Law
School
Students
For
Their
Controversial
Statements
On
Israel


Attorney
Warns
Biglaw’s
Antisemitism
Letter
Makes
Lawyers
Worry
About
Getting
Fired,
Gets
Fired


NYU
Law
SBA
President
Brands
Hamas
Attacks
As
‘Necessary’


Elite
Biglaw
Firm
Adopts
Tougher
Background
Checks
For
New
Hires
Amid
Campus
Protests

Elon Musk Was Behind Effort To Gaslight Americans Into Believing Donald Trump Supports Reproductive Rights – Above the Law

(Photo
by
Apu
Gomes/Getty
Images)

In
the
waning
days
of
the
2024
presidential
election,

a
curious
political
action
committee
,
named
after
the
late
Supreme
Court
justice
Ruth
Bader
Ginsburg,
ran
ads
in
support
of
Donald
Trump,
and,
bizarrely,
claimed
that
RBG
and
Trump
were
of
“one
mind”
on
abortion
rights.
Of
course,
that’s
far
from
accurate.
The
PAC
misconstrued
Trump’s
position
on
reproductive
freedom,
twisting
the
Trump
assertion
that
he
didn’t
support
a
“federal
abortion
ban,”
and
willfully
ignoring
the

other
words

his
campaign
used
to
amount
to
the
same
thing.
To
say
nothing
of
the
Project
2025

plan
to
use
the
Comstock
Act
of
1973

to
severely
limit
access
to
abortion
care
in
this
country.

The
effort
to
conflate
RBG
and
Trump’s
records
on
reproductive
rights
was
derided
as
“nothing
short
of
appalling”
by

RBG’s
granddaughter
,
Clara
Spera.
A
sentiment
shared
by
pretty
much
everyone
horrified
by
the
Supreme
Court’s

overturning
the
right
to
reproductive
freedom
,
ushering
in
a
new
American
era
of

increased
infant
deaths

and
a
spike
in

maternal
mortality
rates
.

The
RBG
PAC
was
created
right
at
the
FEC
deadline
for
the
election
cycle,
with
$20
million
in
secret
donations.
But
now
we
know
who
has
the
deep
pockets
behind
the
misleading
message.


It’s
Elon
Musk
,
because
of
course
it
is.

The
sum
he
spent
on
the
RBG
PAC
was
just
a
drop
in
the
bucket
of
the
total
amount
Musk
spent
to
back
Trump.
All
in,

Musk
threw
down
$250
million

in
support
of
Trump.
No
wonder
he’s
got
a

fancy
new
title

in
the
Trump
administration.


Earlier:


Republicans
Are
Just
Lying
About
Ruth
Bader
Ginsburg
For
Credibility
In
Upcoming
Election




Kathryn Rubino HeadshotKathryn
Rubino
is
a
Senior
Editor
at
Above
the
Law,
host
of

The
Jabot
podcast
,
and
co-host
of

Thinking
Like
A
Lawyer
.
AtL
tipsters
are
the
best,
so
please
connect
with
her.
Feel
free
to
email

her

with
any
tips,
questions,
or
comments
and
follow
her
on
Twitter

@Kathryn1
 or
Mastodon

@[email protected].

Elon Musk Was Behind Effort To Gaslight Americans Into Believing Donald Trump Supports Reproductive Rights – Above the Law

(Photo
by
Apu
Gomes/Getty
Images)

In
the
waning
days
of
the
2024
presidential
election,

a
curious
political
action
committee
,
named
after
the
late
Supreme
Court
justice
Ruth
Bader
Ginsburg,
ran
ads
in
support
of
Donald
Trump,
and,
bizarrely,
claimed
that
RBG
and
Trump
were
of
“one
mind”
on
abortion
rights.
Of
course,
that’s
far
from
accurate.
The
PAC
misconstrued
Trump’s
position
on
reproductive
freedom,
twisting
the
Trump
assertion
that
he
didn’t
support
a
“federal
abortion
ban,”
and
willfully
ignoring
the

other
words

his
campaign
used
to
amount
to
the
same
thing.
To
say
nothing
of
the
Project
2025

plan
to
use
the
Comstock
Act
of
1973

to
severely
limit
access
to
abortion
care
in
this
country.

The
effort
to
conflate
RBG
and
Trump’s
records
on
reproductive
rights
was
derided
as
“nothing
short
of
appalling”
by

RBG’s
granddaughter
,
Clara
Spera.
A
sentiment
shared
by
pretty
much
everyone
horrified
by
the
Supreme
Court’s

overturning
the
right
to
reproductive
freedom
,
ushering
in
a
new
American
era
of

increased
infant
deaths

and
a
spike
in

maternal
mortality
rates
.

The
RBG
PAC
was
created
right
at
the
FEC
deadline
for
the
election
cycle,
with
$20
million
in
secret
donations.
But
now
we
know
who
has
the
deep
pockets
behind
the
misleading
message.


It’s
Elon
Musk
,
because
of
course
it
is.

The
sum
he
spent
on
the
RBG
PAC
was
just
a
drop
in
the
bucket
of
the
total
amount
Musk
spent
to
back
Trump.
All
in,

Musk
threw
down
$250
million

in
support
of
Trump.
No
wonder
he’s
got
a

fancy
new
title

in
the
Trump
administration.


Earlier:


Republicans
Are
Just
Lying
About
Ruth
Bader
Ginsburg
For
Credibility
In
Upcoming
Election




Kathryn Rubino HeadshotKathryn
Rubino
is
a
Senior
Editor
at
Above
the
Law,
host
of

The
Jabot
podcast
,
and
co-host
of

Thinking
Like
A
Lawyer
.
AtL
tipsters
are
the
best,
so
please
connect
with
her.
Feel
free
to
email

her

with
any
tips,
questions,
or
comments
and
follow
her
on
Twitter

@Kathryn1
 or
Mastodon

@[email protected].