From the Insult to Injury Department.
The post Here’s Something Else Goldman-For-The-People Didn’t Do Very Well appeared first on Above the Law.
Category Added in a WPeMatico Campaign
From the Insult to Injury Department.
The post Here’s Something Else Goldman-For-The-People Didn’t Do Very Well appeared first on Above the Law.
Ed.
note:
This
is
the
latest
in
a
series
providing
a
comprehensive
guide
to
networking
at
conferences. Read
the
previous
installment
here.
Continuing
our
exploration
in
“Conquering
Conferences,”
let’s
dive
into
the
art
of
transitioning
into
new
conversations.
Just
as
a
dancer
gracefully
moves
from
one
partner
to
the
next,
we’ll
discuss
how
to
bring
vibrant
energy
to
each
new
interaction.
Embracing
New
Conversations
With
a
smooth
goodbye
under
your
belt,
it’s
time
to
step
into
new
conversations,
keeping
the
rhythm
of
networking
alive.
This
is
where
the
real
dance
of
networking
unfolds,
in
the
steps
between
conversations,
as
you
move
across
the
conference
floor,
ready
to
engage,
learn,
and
connect.
Here
are
some
tips
to
make
each
new
conversation
count:
By
embracing
each
new
conversation
with
the
same
enthusiasm
as
a
dancer
embraces
a
new
song,
you
can
transform
your
conference
experience
from
a
series
of
awkward
steps
into
a
graceful
and
rewarding
dance
of
networking.
Remember,
each
person
you
meet
has
the
potential
to
become
a
valuable
part
of
your
professional
network
or
even
a
lifelong
friend.
So,
take
a
deep
breath,
step
onto
the
dance
floor
of
networking,
and
let
the
music
guide
you
to
your
next
great
conversation.
In
our
next
article,
we’ll
reflect
on
how
to
celebrate
these
small
steps
and
manage
the
natural
jitters
that
come
with
conference
networking.
Embracing
New
Conversations
✔️ Keep
the
energy
high
and
move
to
new
interactions
seamlessly.
✔️ Stay
curious
and
open,
making
every
conversation
an
opportunity
to
learn
and
connect.
Sejal Patel is
the Founder
of
Sage
Ivy,
a
New
York-based
consultancy
specializing
in
empowering
attorneys
with
innovative
practice
development
strategies.
With
over
20
years
of
experience,
Sejal
applies
her
expertise
in
assisting
clients
convert
their
relationships
into
revenue
by
applying
individualized
strategies
to
their
networks
and
leveraging
their
unique
styles
authentically.
Ed.
note:
Welcome
to
our
daily
feature,
Quote
of
the
Day.
Oh,
it’s
so
easy.
It’s
so
easy.
…
I
would
fire
him
within
two
seconds.
—
Former
President
Donald
Trump,
in
comments
given
to
conservative
podcast
host
Hugh
Hewitt,
when
asked
what
he
would
do
if
he
were
reelected
and
had
to
choose
between
firing
special
counsel
Jack
Smith
or
pardoning
himself.
Smith
is
leading
the
Justice
Department’s
investigation
into
Trump’s
attempt
to
overturn
the
2020
presidential
election
as
well
as
his
mishandling
of
classified
documents.
Staci
Zaretsky is
a
senior
editor
at
Above
the
Law,
where
she’s
worked
since
2011.
She’d
love
to
hear
from
you,
so
please
feel
free
to
email
her
with
any
tips,
questions,
comments,
or
critiques.
You
can
follow
her
on
X/Twitter
and
Threads
or
connect
with
her
on
LinkedIn.
25.10.2024
20:53
Police
have
intensified
operations
against
illegal
land
allocations
by
land
barons
across
the
country
following
the
rise
of
illegal
settlements
on
communal,
local
authority,
and
state
lands,
especially
around
major
towns,
cities,
and
growth
points.
Source:
ZRP
Intensifies
Operations
Against
Land
BaronsIn
a
statement
issued
this
Friday,
25
October,
ZRP
spokesperson
Commissioner
Paul
Nyathi
warned
that
land
barons
are
using
falsified
documents
to
deceive
home
seekers,
leading
to
unlawful
constructions
on
state,
wet,
and
grazing
lands.
Reads
the
statement:The
Zimbabwe
Republic
Police
has
intensified
operations
against
illegal
land
allocations
by
land
barons
across
the
country.This
follows
the
proliferation
of
illegal
settlements
on
communal,
local
authority
and
state
lands,
particularly
around
major
towns,
cities
and
growth
points.The
Police
has
established
that
land
barons
are
using
falsified
documents
to
deceive
unsuspecting
home
seekers,
resulting
in
unlawful
constructions
on
state,
wet
and
grazing
lands.The
actions
by
land
barons
violate
the
country’s
laws
including
the
Gazetted
Land
(Consequential
Provisions)
Act,
Chapter
20:28,
Land
Commission
Act,
Chapter
20:29,
Rural
District
Councils
Act
Chapter
29:13
and
Regional,
Town
and
Country
Planning
Act,
Chapter
29:12.So
far,
the
Police
has
made
one
hundred
and
eighty-four
(184)
arrests
on
illegal
land
allocations.Members
of
the
public
are
urged
to
come
forward
and
report
illegal
acts
by
land
barons
to
enable
the
law
to
take
its
course.Anyone
with
information
should
contact
the
National
Complaints
Desk
on
(0242)
703631
or
on
0712
800
197
or
report
at
any
nearest
Police
Station.
Post
published
in:
Featured
HARARE
–
President
Emmerson
Mnangagwa’s
spokesman
George
Charamba
says
he
would
rather
Zimbabwe
quits
the
Commonwealth
forever,
even
as
the
ruling
Zanu
PF
party
has
been
lobbying
some
members
of
the
club
of
former
British
colonies
to
lift
the
country’s
suspension
in
place
since
2002.
Insisting
that
he
was
expressing
a
personal
opinion,
Charamba
said
the
Commonwealth
was
a
“needless
albatross,”
referring
to
demands
for
Zimbabwe
to
implement
democratic
reforms
in
order
to
qualify
for
membership.
“My
personal
view
has
always
warned
against
renewed
interest
in
the
Commonwealth.
It
offers
nothing
to
Zimbabwe
besides
needless
and
fastidious
strictures,”
Charamba
wrote
on
X.
Charamba
said
Zimbabwe
was
“fine
as
it
is”
without
the
Commonwealth
from
which
it
was
suspended
in
2002
over
rights
violations
and
violent
farm
seizures.
Then
President
Robert
Mugabe
withdrew
the
country
from
the
body
a
year
later
after
the
Commonwealth
refused
to
lift
the
suspension
unconditionally.
Mnangagwa,
who
replaced
Mugabe
in
a
military
coup
in
2017,
declared
rejoining
the
Commonwealth
one
of
his
priorities
while
projecting
himself
as
a
reformist,
but
he
has
steered
the
country
deeper
into
tyranny.
Representatives
of
56
countries,
most
with
roots
in
Britain’s
empire,
are
attending
the
Commonwealth
Heads
of
Government
Meeting
that
began
in
Samoa
on
Monday
and
ends
on
Saturday,
with
slavery
and
the
threat
of
climate
change
emerging
as
major
themes.
Zimbabwe’s
re-admission
is
not
on
the
agenda,
but
African
countries
are
expected
to
lobby
for
its
exile
to
be
lifted.
Zanu
PF
spokesman
Chris
Mutsvangwa
met
with
Canada’s
ambassador
Adler
Aristilde
this
week
and
declared
after
the
meeting:
“We
expressed
our
desire
to
rejoin
the
Commonwealth
and
our
expectation
is
an
influential Canada
in
the
Commonwealth
could
also
push
for
Zimbabwe’s
credentials
so
that
we
become
a
part
of
this
club
of
friends
which
historically means
a
lot
to
us.”
Manoah
Esipisu,
Kenya’s
High
Commissioner
to
London
for
six
years
until
May,
told
Politico:
“African
members
have
been
a
little
impatient
about
what
they
see
as
unnecessary
delays
in
this
process
(of
readmitting
Zimbabwe).”
Commonwealth
nations
are
still
awaiting
a
full
report
by
Commonwealth
observers
on
Zimbabwe’s 2023
general
election,
which
re-elected
president
Emmerson
Mnangagwa
amid
claims
of
vote
rigging
and
voter
intimidation.
Human
Rights
Watch
said
the
poll
was
“characterised
by
repression
of
civil
and
political
rights.”
The
report
will
be
crucial
in
deciding
Zimbabwe’s
fate.
Zimbabwe’s
readmission
must
be
backed
by
all
countries
for
it
to
sail
through.
A
Commonwealth
spokesman
said
“the
report
is
in
the
final
stages
of
publication
and
will
be
released
imminently,”
adding:
“We
confirm
that
all
necessary
procedures
have
been
followed.”
Stuart
Mole
of
the
Institute
of
Commonwealth
Studies
said
the
treatment
of
the
report
had
been
“scandalous
and
in
clear
violation”
of
guidelines,
as
the
requirement
to
publish
in
a
timely
way
had
been
“blatantly
ignored.”
He
notably
avoided
endorsing
the
“2030
Mnangagwa”
campaign,
which
aims
to
extend
President
Emmerson
Mnangagwa’s
rule
beyond
the
constitutionally
mandated
two-term
limit.
Chiwenga’s
focus
on
the
well-being
of
citizens
and
economic
prosperity
signals
a
shift
away
from
internal
political
agendas,
even
as
some
Zanu
PF
delegates
push
for
Mnangagwa
to
remain
in
office
until
2030
through
a
proposed
constitutional
amendment.
Instead,
the
Vice
President
addressed
urgent
economic
issues
and
improved
food
security,
presenting
a
contrast
to
the
party’s
current
push
to
keep
Mnangagwa
in
power.
“It
is
therefore
essential
that
we
use
this
conference
to
develop
resolutions
that
drive
industrialisation
and
propel
our
economic
trajectory
towards
modernisation,”
Chiwenga
stated.
“This
will
fulfill
the
vision
of
our
President
for
the
realisation
of
Vision
2030.
As
the
ruling
party,
we
should
value
and
never
take
for
granted
the
trust
that
the
people
of
Zimbabwe
place
in
us
through
their
votes.”
Chiwenga
said
the
supremacy
of
the
party
over
the
government
should
ensure
the
implementation
of
resolutions
made
at
the
party
conference,
which
“should
be
taken
seriously.”
“Our
discussions
should
focus
on
enhancing
the
livelihoods
of
our
people.
Our
economy
must
continue
to
grow
to
ensure
food
security
and
general
prosperity
for
all,”
he
added.
The
Vice
President
stressed
the
importance
of
disciplined
leadership,
highlighting
the
role
of
innovation
and
industry
in
securing
Zimbabwe’s
future.
He
advocated
for
an
education
system
that
aligns
with
the
needs
of
learners,
saying,
“Industry
should
be
supported
by
evidence-based
research,
science,
and
technology
innovation,
leading
to
infrastructure
development.”
He
also
underscored
the
need
for
a
stable
currency,
saying,
“Most
importantly,
our
currency
should
retain
its
value
to
boost
trade
and
commerce
for
the
common
good
and
public
convenience.”
Chiwenga
further
called
for
economic
empowerment
to
take
precedence
over
political
consolidation,
urging
resolutions
that
promote
industrialisation
and
economic
modernisation
in
line
with
Vision
2030.
“As
such,
we
gather
here
to
review
the
implementation
of
resolutions
from
the
20th
National
People’s
Conference
held
in
the
Midlands
in
2023.
Our
revolutionary
party
president
continues
to
ensure
that
the
development
of
our
nation
leaves
no
one
and
no
place
behind,”
he
remarked.
“With
the
conclusion
of
the
National
Development
Strategy
(NDS1)
nearing,
this
conference
gives
us
the
opportunity
to
create
strategies
to
overcome
challenges
such
as
the
El
Niño
drought,
the
COVID-19
pandemic,
and
food
security
issues,”
Chiwenga
said.
He
added
that
as
Zimbabwe
prepares
to
launch
NDS2,
the
party
and
government
must
continue
to
implement
policies
that
uplift
the
livelihoods
of
Zimbabweans.
“Our
growth
must
ensure
equitable
development,
leaving
no
one
and
no
place
behind,”
the
Vice
President
stated.
Reports
indicate
that
tensions
between
Mnangagwa
and
Chiwenga
have
escalated
as
support
for
Mnangagwa’s
third-term
push
gains
momentum.
Many
Zanu
PF
delegates
from
Harare,
Midlands,
Mashonaland,
and
Matabeleland
provinces
have
called
for
Mnangagwa
to
lead
until
2030,
garnering
widespread
support
and
applause.
Despite
his
reluctance
to
endorse
Mnangagwa’s
third-term
bid,
Chiwenga
acknowledged
Mnangagwa’s
contributions
to
Zanu
PF
and
commended
his
leadership
in
agriculture,
mining,
and
tourism
under
the
philosophy,
“Nyika
inovakwa
nevene
vayo,
ilizwe
lakhiwa
ngabanikazi
balo”
(The
country
is
built
by
its
owners).
“Let
me
remind
you
all
that
our
president
has
been
a
consistent
and
influential
figure
in
shaping
Zimbabwe’s
political
landscape
since
the
1960s.
He
has
been
a
loyal,
selfless,
and
dedicated
son
of
this
revolutionary
party,
Zanu
PF,”
Chiwenga
said,
highlighting
Mnangagwa’s
long-standing
service.
Chiwenga
also
praised
Mnangagwa
for
his
decision
to
join
other
Zimbabwean
youth
in
resisting
the
white
minority
rule,
saying,
“The
president
continues
to
defy
the
odds,
embodying
the
true,
unshaken
African
spirit
of hunhu and ubuntu,
especially
in
the
face
of
neo-colonial
challenges
such
as
illegal
sanctions.”
He
concluded
by
urging
Zanu
PF
members
to
remain
united
and
disciplined
in
their
mission
to
build
a
peaceful
and
prosperous
Zimbabwe.
“I
urge
you
all
to
be
disciplined
cadres,
work
together,
and
uphold
our
core
values
of
peace,
unity,
and
development
as
we
strive
to
improve
the
lives
of
our
people,”
said
the
Vice
President.
“Let
us
learn
from
the
president,
in
whom
we
have
total
confidence,
as
a
peacebuilder,
unifier,
and
champion
of
development.”
As
provincial
delegates
took
to
the
stage
to
endorse
Mnangagwa’s
leadership
until
2030,
chants
of
“2030
for
Mnangagwa”
resounded
throughout
the
venue
with
growing
calls
for
his
extended
presidential
term.
Provincial
leaders,
from
Harare
to
the
Midlands,
echoed
the
sentiment,
showing
support
for
proposed
amendments
to
Zimbabwe’s
constitution
that
could
grant
Mnangagwa
a
third
term
or
eliminate
term
limits.
These
prevailing
sentiments
are
feared
to
cement
Mnangagwa’s
leadership
well
beyond
his
current
term,
as
the
2030
mantra
emerged
as
a
dominant
narrative
from
party
delegates.
The
conference
saw
strong
calls
from
all
10
provinces
for
Mnangagwa
to
lead
until
2030.
Harare
Province,
represented
by
Chairman
Godwills
Masimirembwa,
made
the
2030
endorsement
after
they
were
called
on
by
the
party’s
secretary
general,
Obert
Mpofy
to
make
their
greetings.
This
was
followed
by
similar
expressions
of
support
from
Mashonaland
East,
Mashonaland
West,
Masvingo,
Matabeleland
North,
Matabeleland
South,
and
the
Midlands.
This
collective
endorsement,
marked
by
loud
applause,
singing,
and
dancing,
left
little
room
for
discussion
on
succession
plans,
which
were
anticipated,
as
Mnangagwa’s
official
speech
emphasised
unity,
loyalty,
and
party
resilience,
suggesting
that
succession
planning
might
not
be
a
priority
on
the
agenda.
In
his
keynote
address,
Mnangagwa
expressed
gratitude
for
the
party’s
dedication
and
loyalty,
party
discipline
and
loyalty
to
party
leadership.
“Zanu
PF
is
a
moving
train,
always
ready
to
welcome
new
members,”
he
said.
“However,
party
systems
must
be
tightened
and
insulated
against
infiltration
by
divisive
elements
and
malcontents
who
have
no
regard
for
the
political
order
that
is
guaranteed
by
the
supreme
Party
Constitution.”
In
line
with
Article
2,
Sections
8
and
9
of
Zanu
PF’s
amended
Constitution,
the
president
challenged
the
conference
delegates
to
reaffirm
their
commitment
to
the
party’s
Constitution.
“This
binds
all
members
and
must
be
respected,
adhered
to
and
fulfilled
by
all
of
us,
at
every
level,
without
exception,”
Mnangagwa
said
cautioning
party
members
against
“ideological
indecisiveness”
and
that
party
loyalty
is
paramount.
“Further,
the
threats
posed
by
indiscipline
and
political
excesses
of
opportunists
should
be
addressed
head-on.
In
Zanu
PF,
we
toe
the
correct
line
of
the
revolution.
There
is
no
room
for
ideological
indecisiveness.”
Citing
Article
3
Section
19,
Mnangagwa
added,
“Every
member
of
the
Party
has
a
duty
to
be
loyal
to
the
Party
and
its
leadership.”
The
President
avoided
directly
addressing
the
growing
chorus
for
a
2030
agenda
but
underscored
the
importance
of
allegiance
to
Zanu
PF
principles
and
its
leadership
and
stressed
the
need
to
protect
the
party’s
reputation,
instructing
members
to
adhere
to
the
“correct
line
of
the
revolution.”
“Sub-section
(6)
also
obligates
11
us
to
conduct
ourselves
honestly
and
honourably
in
dealing
with
the
Party
and
the
public
so
that
we
do
not
bring
the
Party
or
its
leadership
into
disrepute
and
ridicule,”
Mnangagwa
said
“No
one
will
be
allowed
to
derail
the
Party’s
people-centred
character.
Ultimately,
we
the
people
must
always
defend
the
Party. Zanu
PF
musangano
unoyera.
MuZanu
PF
tine
tsika,
yekukudzana
nekuremekedzana.
Zanu
PF
hayikwani
muhomwe
yemunhu (The
party
does
not
fit
in
one’s
pocket).”
“In
Zanu
PF,
we
toe
the
correct
line
of
the
revolution,”
Mnangagwa
declared,
emphasising
the
need
for
cohesion
within
the
party
ranks.
As
cautioned
by
some
political
analysts
and
opposition
figures,
the
conference
largely
turned
into
a
“rubber
stamp”
event
to
bolster
Mnangagwa’s
2030
ambitions,
with
little
indication
of
open
dialogue
on
succession.
Mnangagwa’s
emphasis
on
unity
and
loyalty
could
also
be
a
prelude
to
a
strengthened
push
for
constitutional
amendments
allowing
him
to
remain
in
office
indefinitely.
Meanwhile,
the
president
also
congratulated
all
members
for
the
successes
scored
by
the
ruling
party
including
victories
in
various
by-elections.
“Overally,
the
Commissariat
undertook
key
activities
such
as
the
restructuring
of
Cells
and
Villages.
The
existence
of
a
credible
and
electronically
stored
Party
Membership
Database
has
become
an
urgent
necessity,”
he
said.
“Delivering
this
multi-functional
membership
register
tool
cannot
be
left
at
the
level
of
the
Party
Headquarters
alone.
It
is
the
duty
of
all
Party
leaders
and
members
to
work
harder
and
honestly
to
deliver
an
accurate
and
verifiable
Party
register.”
“This
will
also
enable
more
responsive
development
planning
over
and
above
the
routine
strengthening
of
our
internal
democratic
processes
and
procedures.”
However,
Mnangagwa
said
he
was
aware
that
in
some
districts,
“chaotic
records
of
members
are
deliberate
and
preferred
by
those
holding
Party
positions
to
gain
favour
or
advantage
over
others.”
He
said
that
was
“unacceptable
and
must
stop.”
“Party
structures
are
critical
for
a
strong
foundation
of
the
revolution.
We
should
guard
against
infiltration
into
the
structures
and
not
destroy
the
structures.”
The
president
also
said
it
is
“pleasing”
that
the
Zanu
PF’s
membership
is
“steadily
growing,
especially
in
provinces
like
Bulawayo.”
“Organisations
and
individuals
affiliating
and
sympathising
with
the
Party
are
broadening.
However,
the
Party
should
not
relax,”
Mnangagwa
said.
In
closing,
Mnangagwa
reiterated
the
importance
of
the
conference.
“The
outcome
of
this
Conference
has
far-reaching
implications.
Zanu
PF
is
the
Party
that
is
leading
Zimbabwe,
developing
every
Province,
District,
Ward
and
Village;
we
shall
industrialise
and
modernise
our
motherland,
ourselves.
Forward
and
forward
ever!,”
he
said.
“With
these
remarks,
it
is
my
singular
honour
and
privilege
to
now
table
the
Central
Committee
Report
and
declare
the
21st
National
People’s
Conference,
officially
open.
Zanu
PF
is
the
Party
that
is
leading
Zimbabwe…
we
shall
industrialise
and
modernise
our
motherland,
ourselves.”
BULAWAYO
–
Chief
Marupi’s
death
in
Harare
on
Sunday
has
triggered
a
feud
between
his
family
and
the
local
councillor
who
drove
him
to
the
capital,
allegedly
without
their
knowledge.
The
28-year-old
chief
from
Dibilashaba
in
Gwanda
South,
real
name
Oaheng
Nare,
died
at
Health
Point
Hospital
in
Harare
after
being
admitted
while
complaining
of
a
tummy
ache
and
vomiting.
His
death
came
just
two
weeks
after
armed
robbers
raided
his
rural
home
and
stole
his
official
Isuzu
vehicle.
He
was
unharmed
in
that
incident,
but
his
family
now
fears
the
robbery
and
his
death
so
soon
after
are
connected.
The
family’s
fury
has
been
directed
at
Mphathiswa
Ncube,
the
local
Zanu
PF
councillor
and
chairman
of
the
Gwanda
Rural
District
Council
who
was
the
last
person
to
see
the
chief
alive
after
driving
him
to
the
capital,
supposedly
to
seek
medical
treatment.
The
family
wonders
why
the
treatment
could
not
be
found
at
hospitals
in
Bulawayo.
Molisa
Nare,
a
local
headman
and
relative
of
the
late
chief,
said:
“We’re
still
in
a
state
of
confusion
about
his
death
because
before
he
is
taken
to
Harare
he
was
complaining
of
a
headache.
Now
we’re
being
told
in
Harare
he
had
an
upset
stomach.
“The
whole
thing
is
difficult
to
understand.
We
hope
the
postmortem
will
shed
some
light.”
Angelina
Marupi
Moyo,
the
late
chief’s
aunt,
said
Chief
Marupi’s
trip
to
Harare
was
shrouded
in
mystery.
She
told
local
community
radio
station
Ntepe-Manama
FM:
“His
departure
from
home
for
Harare
is
something
we’re
still
trying
to
understand.
Another
thing
is
that
we
knew
him
to
be
having
a
headache
and
the
new
narrative
from
the
hospital
that
he
was
vomiting
and
had
a
runny
tummy
adds
to
our
confusion.
“We’re
in
pain
over
what
has
befallen
us.”
Ncube
told
ZimLive
he
would
have
something
to
say
only
after
the
burial.
“I’m
sorry,
for
now
I’m
not
in
a
position
to
comment.
I
will
comment
after
the
burial,”
he
said.
The
chief’s
body
was
expected
to
leave
Harare
on
Friday
with
burial
likely
on
Sunday,
family
spokesman
Chris
Marupi
said.
A
family
source
told
ZimLive
that
they
were
also
curious
over
the
role
of
President
Emmerson
Mnangagwa’s
son-in-law,
the
lawyer
Gerald
Mlotshwa,
in
the
chief’s
trip
to
Harare.
The
source
said:
“We
understand
he
paid
everything,
including
the
hospital
bill.
The
question
is
why?”
Mlotshwa
is
reported
to
have
met
the
chief
several
times
in
recent
months
while
seeking
his
signature
in
his
bid
to
take-over
the
safari
section
of
the
55,000-hectare
Doddieburn
Ranch,
which
is
in
Chief
Marupi’s
jurisdiction.
Cecilia
Bhebhe,
the
owner
of
Motsamai
lodges,
currently
holds
the
lease
for
the
ranch.
Questions
left
for
Mlotshwa
had
not
been
answered.
Chief
Marupi,
one
of
the
youngest
traditional
leaders
in
the
country
at
the
time
of
his
death,
was
“receptive
to
advice
and
humble,”
according
to
stand-in
chief
of
the
nearby
Garanyemba
chieftaincy
Jefrey
Ndlovu-Nhlamba.
“He
prioritised
traditional
cultural
practices
as
his
role
demanded.
As
the
people
of
Gwanda,
we
have
all
been
robbed
of
a
good
man
who
had
no
quarrel
with
anyone,”
Ndlovu-Nhlamba
said.
Yesterday, Starlink started shutting
its
customers
in
Zimbabwe
who
are
on
the
Roam
Service.
These
are
subscribers
who
were
using
Starlink
kits
registered
in
Malawi,
Mozambique,
Zambia
and
Eswatini
before
Starlink
got
its
license
in
Zimbabwe.
Once
Starlink
got
its
license,
it
gave
these
customers
a
60-day
grace
period
to
transfer
their
kits
to
Zimbabwean
addresses.
That
or
the
kit
has
to
return
and
connect
from
its
registered
address
outside
the
country
in
order
to
get
another
60
days.
There
have
been
suggestions
these
Roam
subscribers
were
as
many
as
5,000.
So
this
affects
a
good
number
of
people.
Some
were
able
to
transfer
their
accounts
to
Zimbabwe,
but
some
could
not
because
of
payment
problems
and capacity
issues
in
Harare.
The
Harare
capacity
problem
is
quite
significant
now
–
there’s
just no
more
capacity,
indefinitely.
Those
subscribers
are
stuck
wait
for
capacity
to
open
up
before
they
can
transfer.
But
there’s
another
option.
Affected
subscribers
can
upgrade
their
account
to
a
more
expensive Starlink
Business
package.
And
strangely,
customers
can’t
do
this
directly
with
Starlink
via
its
website.
It
can
only
be
done
via
resellers,
and
they’re
charging
significantly
more
for
subscriptions
than
Starlink
is.
And
one
of
them
is
charging
a
‘transfer
fee’
of
$150.
There
are
only
two Starlink
Authorised
Resellers
in
Zimbabwe who
are cleared
to
operate
in
the
country
by
the
regulator –
Telone
and
Aura.
Where
Starlink
charges
$71
a
month
for
its
entry
level
business
package,
TelOne
is
charging
$115.
Aura
is
charging
$104.
Direct Starlink.com Price |
Aura Price |
TelOne Price |
|
---|---|---|---|
Kit Transfer Fee |
free | $150 | free |
40 GB Priority |
$71 | $104 | $115 |
1TB Priority |
$101 | $152 | $160 |
2TB Priority |
$200 | $296 | $320 |
You
can
view
the TelOne
price
sheet
here,
and
the Aura
Starlink
price
sheet
here.
Their
reason
for
charging
at
least
46%
more
is
apparently
their
markup
plus
taxes
they
have
to
pay
locally
(Potraz,
RBZ,
ZIMRA).
But
still,
this
feels
too
much.
We’re
right
back
to
the
problem
of
extortionate
pricing/taxing
that’s
made
the
internet
so
expensive
in
Zimbabwe.
As
for
the
transfer
fee
that
Aura
charges,
a
representative
of
the
company
we
spoke
to
said:
It’s
USD150
to
legalize
the
kit
as
we
have
to
pay
fees
to
Potraz
and
Zimra
since
most
if
not
all
of
these
kits
were
smuggled
But
it’s
difficult
to
understand
because
you’d
expect
TelOne
to
also
charge
a
fee.
Or
is
it
TelOne
is
unaware
of
fees
they
need
to
pay
to
Potraz?
And
on
the
subscription
side,
how
is
Potraz
allowing
TelOne
to
charge
more
than
Aura
for
essentially
the
same
service?
Is
it
that
Starlink
prices
are
not
regulated
the
same
as
other
internet
tariffs
in
Zimbabwe?
It
would
make
sense
if
these
companies
were,
themselves,
doing
the
technical
work
and
resourcing
the
physical
infrastructure
to
provide
this
internet.
They
are
not.
They
are
simply
collecting
subscriptions
payments
on
behalf
of
Starlink.
It’s
those
in
Harare
and
surrounding
areas
where
capacity
has
sold
out
who
have
to
go
through
the
resellers.
If
you’re
outside
these
areas,
this
does
not
affected
you.
However,
due
to
Starlink’s
popularity,
it
is
possible
the
other
cities
will
run
out
of
capacity
too.
Bulawayo
especially,
might.
To
protect
yourself
against
this
possibility,
it
is
better
to
transfer
your
Starlink
kit
right
away.
Or
buy
one
right
away
if
you
you
don’t
have
it
already.
While
you’re
at
it,
you
might
also
want
to
get
Starlink’s
$71
business
package
direct
from
Starlink.com
now
before
you’re
forced
to
go
through
the
resellers.
This
ensures
that
you
get
faster
priority
internet
when
capacity
becomes
a
challenge.
But
it
also
ensures
you
pay
a
much
lower
subscriptions.
Law
professor
Jonathan
Turley
thinks
it’s
silly
to
suggest
that
Donald
Trump
would
embrace
authoritarianism
in
a
hypothetical
second
term.
Turley
arrived
at
this
conclusion
despite
warnings
from
Trump’s
former
cabinet
secretaries,
the
Supreme
Court’s
newfound
absolute
executive
immunity
stance,
the
assurances
of
Trump’s
second-term
hopefuls,
and
TRUMP’S
OWN
WORDS.
Turley
reminds
his
audience
that
he
actually
knows
better
than
all
those
particularly
damning
vectors
of
evidence
because
those
people
get
in
the
way
of
Jonathan
Turley’s
gravy
train:
appearing
on
TV
to
tell
Trump-skeptical
Republicans
not
to
worry.
So
instead,
he’s
just
going
to
ignore
all
that
testimony
and
pretend
it’s
just
something
AOC
and
the
hosts
of
The
View
talk
about.
Besides,
even
if
Trump
were
interested
in
autocracy,
some
serious
moderate
would
probably
stop
him
somewhere
along
the
line,
right?
All
that
is
required
is
for
over
two
centuries
of
constitutional
order
to
fail
suddenly,
and
for
virtually
every
constitutional
actor
in
our
system
to
suddenly
embrace
tyranny.Those
pushing
this
hysteria
often
curiously
cite
the
January
6
riot
as
proof
that
the
end
is
near.
Yet
that
horrible
day
was
the
vindication,
not
the
expiration,
of
our
constitutional
system.
The
system
worked.
The
riot
was
put
down.
Congress,
including
Republicans,
reassembled
and
certified
Biden
as
the
next
president.In
the
courts,
many
Trump-appointed
judges
ruled
against
challenges
to
the
election.Our
system
was
put
through
a
Cat
5
stress
test
and
did
not
even
sway
for
a
moment.
The
Supreme
Court
just
explicitly
rejected
the
idea
that
it’s
illegal
for
a
president
could
assassinate
a
political
rival
as
long
as
it’s
justified
as
an
“official”
security
act.
The
election
was
so
laughably
NOT
close
that
even
most
Republican
judges
didn’t
want
to
stick
their
neck
out
over
it.
And
January
6
was
not
a
Cat
5
stress
test
the
way
2024
could
be
with
election
officials
who’ve
made
denialism
part
of
their
pitch.
If
a
bunch
of
flag-draped
tourists
managed
to
steal
a
few
lecterns
without
tanking
democracy,
why
would
election-denying
state
officials
even
try,
right?
And
how
was
it
a
stress
test
if
it
was
all
an
Antifa
hoax?
How
do
these
people
keep
their
conspiracies
straight?
Former
Rep.
Liz
Cheney
(R-Wyo.)
has
declared
with
authority
that
either
you
vote
for
Harris,
or
this
“may
well
be
the
last
real
vote
you
ever
get
to
cast.”
As
for
his
reminder
that
when
he
says
“Congress,
including
Republicans,
reassembled
and
certified
Biden
as
the
next
president,”
those
plucky
side
characters
all
got
purged
the
next
time
they
faced
voters.
They’ve
been
sent
home
from
their
big
city
jobs
and
are
probably
opening
a
book
store
in
their
home
town
and
reconnecting
with
their
small
town
crushes
just
in
time
for
Hallmark
holiday
season.
Just
kidding,
they’re
oil
lobbyists.
Others,
like
running
mate
JD
Vance,
have
spent
the
intervening
years
coming
around
to
the
position
that
Trump
didn’t
lose
that
they
would’ve
never
taken
at
the
time.
Which
is
before
we
even
consider
this
sophomoric
argument
in
its
proper
context:
even
if
you
think
the
Trump
judiciary
and
congressional
Republicans
would
hold
up
in
the
face
of
an
authoritarian
power
grab,
WHY
WOULD
YOU
EVEN
WANT
TO
TEST
THAT?
It’s
almost
impossible
to
imagine
a
serious
account
of
this
subject
without
even
acknowledging
any
of
this.
And,
in
fact,
Turley’s
article
is
deeply
unserious.
But
he
kept
with
it
to
close
out
the
week,
glossing
over
concerns
about
election
officials
that
ran
on
denialism
claims
with
triumphal
follow
up
today,
crowing
that
no
one
should
worry
about
voter
suppression
measures
because
they’re…
popular!
Democratic
candidates,
including
Vice
President
Harris,
have
denounced
voter
identification
laws
as
“Jim
Crow
2.0”
attacks
on
voters.
A
majority
of
voters
have
long
supported
these
laws.
According
to
a
new
Gallup
poll,
that
majority
is
now
a
supermajority.
It’s
unintentionally
fitting
that
Turley
brushes
off
the
substantive
risk
that
these
laws
revive
the
legacy
of
Jim
Crow
with
“most
people
support
it.”
In
1966,
a
supermajority
of
Americans
had
an
unfavorable
view
of
Martin
Luther
King
Jr.
too
so
maybe
our
take
on
the
merits
of
civil
rights
abuses
shouldn’t
be
decided
by
opinion
polls.
Then
again,
Jonathan
Turley
had
no
idea
that
MLK
was
ever
arrested
for
protesting
segregation
so
his
grasp
of
constitutional
history
might
be
a
little
shaky.
Adding
voter
ID
hurdles,
either
at
the
polls
or
at
registration,
are
almost
always
popular
because
they
sound
superficially
reasonable.
While
voter
fraud
cases
are
extraordinarily
rare,
too
sporadic
to
actually
influence
any
significant
election,
and
almost
always
the
result
of
a
legal
misunderstanding
or
people
trying
to
vote
twice
(examples
of
illegal
voting
that
identification
laws
aren’t
even
needed
to
stop)
the
drumbeat
for
these
new
laws
to
“protect”
elections
have
sounded
for
years.
Why
do
these
calls
come
exclusively
from
the
same
side
of
the
aisle
that
wanted
to
hang
Mike
Pence
for
not
unilaterally
tossing
votes?
Well,
because
the
Republican
Party,
exclusively,
has
decided
that
voter
ID
laws
are
a
surprise
tool
that
will
help
them
later.
There’s
nothing
per
se
wrong
with
voter
identification.
The
right
to
vote
should
not
be
contingent
on
having
a
car
or
an
interest
in
air
travel
so
there
would
have
to
be
a
widespread
method
of
identification
besides
a
driver’s
license
or
passport.
And
until
the
Supreme
Court
decides
otherwise,
the
Constitution
doesn’t
countenance
a
poll
tax,
so
access
to
these
IDs
would
have
to
be
free
and
not
gatekept
beyond
artificial
obstacles
like
closing
all
the
DMVs
in
majority
Black
areas
of
the
state
(a
move
that
one
state
pulled
and
then
reversed
under
widespread
scrutiny).
But
that’s
the
rub,
isn’t
it?
The
issue,
as
someone
cosplaying
as
a
constitutional
scholar
should
know,
is
that
the
country
has
a
long
history
of
voter
suppression
behind
superficially
neutral
mechanisms.
Turley
should,
theoretically,
be
aware
of
the
legacy
of
voter
literacy
tests,
justified
as
a
means
to
ensure
an
informed
electorate
but
written
with
vague
questions
allowing
the
administrator
to
pass
or
fail
voters
based
on
race.
Surely,
Turley
(heh)
wouldn’t
rubberstamp
a
new
round
of
literacy
tests
based
on
the
general
public’s
saying
they
want
educated
voters.
Or
maybe
he
would…
I
guess
we
don’t
know
how
far
he’ll
bend
to
get
invited
on
cable
news
at
this
point.
The
complaint
around
voter
ID
laws
is
that
the
general
public
fails
to
understand
that
the
introduction
of
“popular”
voting
requirements
rarely
get
deployed
without
serious
shenanigans.
Anyone
who’s
tried
to
walk
into
a
bar
between
the
ages
of
21-25
knows
how
ID
laws
work.
Someone
is
going
to
look
at
it
and
decide
—
based
mostly
on
vibes
—
if
you
look
enough
like
the
picture
on
that
card
to
be
legal.
Some
patrons
will
draw
little
to
no
scrutiny
while
others
will
get
a
thorough
once
over.
The
problem
with
voter
ID
is
not
the
idea
of
voters
merely
having
an
ID,
it’s
the
prospect
of
a
random
poll
worker
who
fervently
believes
Venezuelan
space
lasers
controlled
the
last
election
scanning
everyone
walking
into
the
room
and
deciding
that
an
elderly
Black
guy
or
a
soccer
mom
with
the
Notorious
RBG
Stanley
cup
just
don’t
look
enough
like
their
pictures!
Bringing
us
back
to
Turley’s
comical
claim
to
being
a
“constitutional”
expert.
The
reason
we
have
a
Constitution
is
to
guard
against
popular,
ill-thought
out
ideas
by
recognizing
the
risk
they
pose
in
greasing
the
wheels
of
the
tyranny
of
the
majority.
A
constitutional
scholar
would
approach
popular
policies
with
a
skeptical
eye
—
especially
when
it
comes
to
voting
laws,
a
subject
that’s
given
rise
to
amendments,
multiple
statutory
fixes,
and
a
litany
of
court
challenges.
You
know…
all
those
times
that
the
Constitution
faced
actual
Cat
5
stress
tests.
Even
if
a
serious
law
professor
ultimately
saw
the
benefits
of
voter
ID
laws
as
a
tailored
cure
to
largely
nonexistent
false
identity
voter
fraud
outweighing
the
risks,
they
would
have
to
make
a
case
for
WHY
they
dispense
with
these
historically
supported
concerns
such
that
a
detractor
could
honestly
engage
that
claim
on
the
merits.
But
Turley
is
not
a
serious
man.
Joe
Patrice is
a
senior
editor
at
Above
the
Law
and
co-host
of
Thinking
Like
A
Lawyer.
Feel
free
to email
any
tips,
questions,
or
comments.
Follow
him
on Twitter or
Bluesky
if
you’re
interested
in
law,
politics,
and
a
healthy
dose
of
college
sports
news.
Joe
also
serves
as
a
Managing
Director
at
RPN
Executive
Search.