Parents cry foul after Rusunguko school demands US$120 fees top-up

HARARE

Parents
at
Rusununguko
High
School
near
Goromonzi
are
up
in
arms
with
the
Zanu
PF
owned
learning
institution
which
has
demanded
up
to
US$120
per
child
as
top
up
fees
without
consulting
and
agreeing
with
them.

According
to
a
notice
sent
to
parents
via
a
WhatsApp
group
by
the
CEO
Maone
Veremu,
the
school
was
demanding
US$30
top-up
from
learners
whose
entire
termly
fees
of
US$605
were
initially
paid
in
US
dollars
and
US$120
top-up
from
those
who
had
settled
for
the
alternative
option
of
depositing
US$400
and
the
US$205
remainder
in
ZiG
equivalent
at
interbank
rate.

The
decision
to
demand
top-up,
according
to
Vheremu,
was
influenced
by
the
need
to
plug
the
deficit
created
by
the
sharp
decline
in
the
value
of
ZiG
recently.

Vheremu
said
the
supplementary
budget
was
targeting
costs
of
running
the
school’s
diesel
generator
which
he
claimed
was
guzzling
140
litres
a
day
as
it
was
running
from
2AM
to
8.30PM
everyday.


He
said
the
generator
had
become
the
main
source
of
energy
at
the
school
owing
to
prolonged
power
outages
being
experienced
in
the
country.

“This
makes
the
budget
for
fuel
totally
inadequate,”
said
Vheremu,
adding
that
the
unpopular
decision
was
approved
by
both
the
DSC
and
school
authorities.

Vheremu
said
“the
circumstances
that
led
to
this
development
are
beyond
our
control”.

Parents
were
expected
to
have
paid
the
top
up
by
Saturday
26
October
2024.

It
emerged
the
school
went
against
parents’
recommendations
to
settle
for
a
solar
system
instead
of
the
generator
which
they
argued
was
more
costly
to
run.

Speaking
on
condition
of
anonymity,
an
angry
parent
cried
blackmail
by
“greedy”
school
authorities
he
accused
of
attempts
to
harvest
cheap
cash
from
an
enrolment
of
over
a
thousand
learners.

The
parent
said
it
was
even
a
bigger
scam
for
those
with
Form
4
kids
who
are
meant
to
leave
the
school
premises
after
exams
mid-November
and
were
still
expected
to
be
at
par
with
the
rest
in
terms
of
top-up
fees.

Another
parent
accused
the
authorities
of
running
the
school
like
their
own
private
enterprise
where
decisions
are
made
at
a
passing
whim
and
are
never
presented
to
the
education
ministry
for
approval.

“They
just
set
and
unilaterally
decided
that
they
want
money
and
thought
they
were
going
to
get
that
money
from
us.

“To
us,
that
is
a
nonstarter,”
said
the
parent.

“When
we
paid
our
fees,
any
arrangement
that
was
made,
be
it
pure
USD,
half
USD
and
ZiG
whatever,
we
said
everyone
paid
the
same
fees.

“There
is
no
need
to
wake
up
tomorrow
and
start
saying
just
because
you
paid
pure
USD
and
the
other
one
split,
top-up
amounts
are
different.”

Parents
felt
there
should
have
been
a
fully
constituted
meeting
with
all
stakeholders
involved
where
figures
are
suggested
and
tested
before
being
forwarded
to
the
ministry
to
approve.

Added
the
parent,
“As
parents,
generally
all
the
Forms,
from
Form
One
to
upper
6,
we
are
saying
we
do
not
want
to
pay
anything,
because
they
initially
did
their
budget,
they
projected
their
costs;
why
come
back
today
and
say
the
money
is
not
enough.”

Vheremu
did
not
respond
to
questions
sent
to
him
via
his
mobile
phone
by
ZimLive.

However,
in
a
latter
development,
the
school
was
forced
to
charge
a
uniform
US$30
on
all
learners.

“The
responsible
authority
ZimFep
has
approved
the
fee
top
up
of
US$30
per
learner
to
enable
the
school
to
complete
the
term.

“The
plight
of
the
parents
has
been
considered
at
the
same
time
not
compromising
the
welfare
of
the
learners,”
wrote
ZimFep
director
of
communication
in
correspondence
seen
by
ZimLive.

While
relieved
by
the
new
development,
another
parent
said
he
still
felt
the
school
was
not
sincere
in
its
initial
claims
US$120
was
needed
as
top-up
only
to
slash
it
to
just
US$30
at
the
stroke
of
a
pen
without
explanation.

“Realistically,
if
their
mathematics
was
on
point
and
everything
was
supported,
why
would
you
reduce
from
US$120
to
US$30.

“Yes,
it
is
an
advantage
to
us
but
a
lot
is
happening
behind
the
scenes,”
she
said.

Rusununguko
High
School
in
Melfort
outside
Harare
is
operated
by
the
Zimbabwe
Foundation
for
Education
with
Production
(ZimFep),
an
education
wing
under
Zanu
PF.

The
rest
of
the
nearly
half
dozen
schools
under
ZimFep
have
not
demanded
any
top-up,
something
that
has
riled
parents
at
Rusunnguko.

Building CoPilot’s CoPilot (For Lawyers) – Above the Law

In
the
early
days
of
the
computer
revolution,
the
big
hardware
manufacturers
thought
they’d
just
kicked
off
an
intense
battle
for
market
dominance.
Instead,
what
Microsoft
figured
out
was
that
the
computer
on
the
desk
doesn’t
matter
as
much
as
the
programs
making
the
computer
run.
Decades
later,
Microsoft
has
a
stranglehold
on
the
business
world.

When
LawToolBox
began
in
legal
calendaring,
its
founders
bet
on
Microsoft,
forging
a
partnership
to
enrich
its
applications
for
legal
industry
use.
Which
has
paid
off
for
the
company
as
it’s
grown
from
calendaring
to
function
as
an
AI-enabled
umbrella
platform
within
Microsoft365

embedded
more
than
integrated
into
Microsoft

living
in
the
DMS,
Outlook,
Teams,
and
everything
else.
Changes
or
updates
populate
across
a
firm’s
ecosystem,
meaning
a
lawyer
can
adjust
a
deadline
in
Outlook,
and
that
update
will
reflect
across
all
relevant
matter
files,
calendars,
and
documents
in
real
time.
An
incredibly
useful
product,
but
it
remained
hard
to
succinctly
explain
the
extent
of
LawToolBox’s
role
within
the
system
without
resorting
to
incomplete
descriptions
like
“Microsoft’s
legal
helper.”

But
Microsoft’s
CoPilot
branding
unintentionally
provides
a
better
way
to
describe
how
LawToolBox
fits
into
a
Microsoft-based
environment.
The
company
uses
the
phrase
“CoPilot
for
Legal”
but
after
reviewing
what
they’re
doing,
it’s
more
like
“CoPilot’s
CoPilot”
for
this
industry.
Either
way,
it’s
a
much
more
straightforward
description
that
can
resonate
across
the
industry
and
with
clients.

The
first
legal
app
approved
for
Microsoft
CoPilot
back
in
December
2023,
LawToolBox
offers
a
lot
of
enhancements
to
the
out-of-the-box
AI
offering.
“Our
ability
to
access
a
wide
range
of
pre-built
and
customizable
Al
models
and
built
and
customizable
Al
models
and
easy-to-use
APIs
through
Azure
OpenAl
helps
our
solution
maintain
the
optimal
level
of
intelligence
to
recognize
matter-specific
dates
and
other
types
of
content,
even
from
handwritten
notes,”
COO
Carol-Lynn
Grow
notes.
There’s
also
a
legal
prompt
library
providing
pre-configured
prompts
for
routine
tasks
and
an
option
for
firms
to
design
customized
workflows
for
complex
matters.


Every
time
Microsoft
makes
copilot
show
up
in
new
places



like
Excel
or
PowerPoint

LawToolBox
is
along
for
the
ride
and
automatically
shows
up
in
those
places
too.

And
outside
of
CoPilot
proper,
LawToolBox
developed
its
own
“LawToolBox
AI,”
offering
many
of
the
same
capabilities
as
Microsoft’s
Copilot

reading
PDFs,
scanning
handwritten
documents,
and
organizing
data

without
the
CoPilot
price
tag.
“Microsoft
suggested
we
build
this,”
Grow
said.
“It’s
still
on
their
platform,
and
they’re
excited
about
making
AI
accessible
at
every
level.”

And
securely
accessible
at
every
level,
leveraging
all
the
security
that
Microsoft
offers
including
the
MACC
(Microsoft
Azure
Consumption
Commitment),
while
providing quick
access
to
documents,
deadlines,
and
co-authoring
capabilities
in
Word,
with
everything
tied
back
to
a
case
or
client
matter
with
its
Matter
Container
concept
for
organizing
legal
matters
within
the
Microsoft
ecosystem.

The
best
story
that
we
have
to
tell
about
the
way
attorneys’
lives
are
changed,
is
that
an
attorney
is
at
a
soccer
game
and
they’ve
got
an
M&A
deal
and
they’re
like,
oh
shoot,
that’s


tomorrow
in
the
Outlook
calendar
entry,
they
just
click
on
the
documents
link
and
it
has
all
their
documents
and
everything’s
secure
and
right
there
on
their
iPhone.”

As
Microsoft
continues
to
evolve,
so
does
LawToolBox.
At
this
year’s
Microsoft
Ignite
conference,
CEO
Satya
Nadella’s
keynote
highlighted
LawToolBox
as
a
prime
example
of
a
partner
using
Copilot
to
bring
AI
into
specialized
industries.
It’s
a
recognition
not
just
of
LawToolBox’s
technical
prowess
but
of
the
vision
that
has
carried
them
from
1998
to
today.

And
a
reflection
of
Microsoft’s
vision
dating
back
to
the
early
80s.
What
matters
is
the
software
that
makes
the
system
go.
LawToolBox
operates
as
a
secure
bridge
between
Microsoft’s
applications
and
legal-specific
needs.
Empowering
law
firms
to
use
familiar
tools
like
NetDocuments
and
SharePoint
while
providing
AI
capabilities
required
to
compete
in
this
AI
moment.
When
it
comes
to
CoPilot,
LawToolBox
has
embraced
the
task
of
making
it
work
for
lawyers.

Because
even
CoPilots
need
CoPilots
sometimes.

Republicans Are Politicizing Judicial Ethics Complaints – Above the Law

In
the
lead
up
to
the
2024
election,
we’re
hearing
a
lot
about

“politicizing”
government
institutions


usually
by
Republicans
looking
to
shake
public
confidence
in
neutral
bodies
charged
with
maintaining
law
and
order.
But
in
North
Carolina,
the
GOP
is
doing
exactly
what
they
accuse
Democrats
of
doing.

State
Supreme
Court
Justice
Allison
Riggs
is
in
the
middle
of
a

tight
election

to
keep
her
seat.
And
she’s
been
hitting
the
campaign
trail,
talking
about
her
stance
on
important
issues
that
matter
to
voters,
like
reproductive
freedom…
And,
relatedly,
her
opponent’s,
Judge
Jefferson
Griffin
of
the
North
Carolina
Court
of
Appeals,
comments
that
“life
begins
at
conception.”
This
is
apparently
a
bridge
too
far
for
three
Republicans
in
the
North
Carolina
Legislature,
and
they
filed
an
ethics

complaint

with
the
Judicial
Standards
Commission.


At
Slate
,
Billy
Corriher
points
out
the
absurdity
of
the
move:

Three
Republicans
in
the
North
Carolina
Legislature
have
filed
an
ethics
complaint
against
state
Supreme
Court
Justice
Allison
Riggs,
a
former
civil
rights
lawyer
who
is
running
for
reelection.
Did
she

rule
in
favor
of
her
father
 after
refusing
to
recuse
in
the
case,
as
her
colleague
has
repeatedly
done?
No.
Did
she,
as
a
Republican
justice
did, rule
for
a
company
 whose
stock
she
owns?
No.
Her
alleged
offense
was
talking
about
reproductive
rights
on
the
campaign
trail
and
calling
out
her
opponent
for
declaring
that
“life
begins
at
conception.”

Interestingly,
Griffin
was
ready
to
go
with
an
attack
ad:

The
complaint
against
Riggs
itself,
as
well
as
the
GOP’s
response
to
it,
could
raise
further
ethical
issues.
Ethics
rules prohibit
legislators
from
using
 public
resources
to
help
political
candidates.
Yet
Riggs’
opponent,
Judge
Jefferson
Griffin
of
the
North
Carolina
Court
of
Appeals,
had
an attack
ad
ready
to
go
 referencing
the
“investigation”
almost
as
soon
as
the
ethics
complaint
was
revealed.
Moreover,
a
memo
from
the
JSC
instructs
judges
that
ethics
rules
require
that
judicial
campaign
ads
not
“diminish
public
confidence”
in
the
courts
or
be
intentionally
misleading
,”
and
it’s
not
clear
if
the
JSC
is
even
investigating
Riggs
or
preparing
to
issue
a
“formal
advisory
opinion.”

This
isn’t
the
first
time
this
move
has
been
busted
out
of
the
GOP
playbook.
In
Wisconsin’s
2023
state
supreme
court
election,
challenger
Janet
Protasiewicz
also
made
comments
on
issues
relevant
to
voters

she
spoke
about

reproductive
freedom
as
well
as
redistricting
maps

— without
committing
how
she
would
rule
on
a
particular
case.
Protasiewicz
faced
an
ethics
complaint
as
a
result,
but
it
was
eventually

dismissed

(after
she
won
the
election).
Hopefully
the
case
against
Riggs
faces
a
similar
fate.




Kathryn Rubino HeadshotKathryn
Rubino
is
a
Senior
Editor
at
Above
the
Law,
host
of

The
Jabot
podcast
,
and
co-host
of

Thinking
Like
A
Lawyer
.
AtL
tipsters
are
the
best,
so
please
connect
with
her.
Feel
free
to
email

her

with
any
tips,
questions,
or
comments
and
follow
her
on
Twitter

@Kathryn1
 or
Mastodon

@[email protected].

Biglaw Associates Are Billing Hours In Bulk, Hoping For Special Bonuses On Top Of Regular Bonuses – Above the Law

With
Halloween
nearly
upon
us,
that
means
bonus
season
is
right
around
the
corner.
In
years
past,
Biglaw
firms
were
all
about
treats,
offering
pandemic-related
special
bonuses
amid
a
white-hot
lateral
market.
But
here
in
2024,
some
firms
are
handing
out
tricks

like
$0
in

Milbank
special
bonus
cash

(thus
far,
at
least).
That
said,
associates
are
now
eagerly
awaiting
their
year-end
bonuses.
In
fact,
the
majority
of
the
500-plus
respondents
to
our
annual
bonus
season
survey
think
2024’s
overall
bonus
compensation
will
be
higher
last
year’s
bonuses.

As
a
little
reminder

as
if
you
really
needed
one

this
is
what
last
year’s

Milbank
/Cravath
bonuses
looked
like:


  • Class
    of
    2023:
    $15,000
    (pro-rated)

  • Class
    of
    2022:
    $20,000

  • Class
    of
    2021:
    $30,000

  • Class
    of
    2020:
    $57,500

  • Class
    of
    2019:
    $75,000

  • Class
    of
    2018:
    $90,000

  • Class
    of
    2017:
    $105,000

  • Class
    of
    2016+:
    $115,000

Bonus
money
remained
the
same
in
2023
after
Cravath
increased
the
size
of
its
bonuses
across
all
class
years
in
2021.
Everyone
saw
more
money,
and
the
most
senior
associates
in
Biglaw
received
$115,000
instead
of
the
usual
$100,000.
Once
again,
it
was
a
great
year
for
bonuses.
With
all
of
that
background,
let’s
turn
to
this
year’s
bonuses.


Considering
current
economic
conditions,
what
will
2024
bonuses
look
like?

2024BonusChangeFrom2023

More
than
half
of
associates
(57%)
predict
that
bonuses
will
be
higher
than
they
were
in
2023.
This
is
a
dramatic
shift
from
last
year’s
survey,
when
just
14%
of
associates
surveyed
predicted
higher
bonuses

but
last
year,
Milbank’s
special
bonuses
weren’t
in
the
mix.
Will
firms
decide
to
add
include
them
along
with
their
regular
year-end
bonuses?
Biglaw
firms
better
not
disappoint,
because
we
can’t
even
imagine
the
state
of
uproar
it
would
cause
among
associates.

So,
will
any
other
money
be
headed
associates’
way?
Our
respondents
seem
pretty
enthusiastic
when
it
comes
to
bonuses
on
top
of
bonuses
in
2024.


Do
you
think
your
firm
will
use
the
year-end
bonus
announcement
to
match
the
Milbank
summer
bonus
or
offer
any
other
special
bonuses?

2024SpecialBonusPredictions

Most
associates
are
also
much
more
optimistic
about
special
bonuses
than
they
were
in
2023.
Last
year,
83%
of
associates
surveyed
said
they
didn’t
expect
to
see
any
special
bonuses,
whereas
this
year,
62%
of
associates
think
there
will
be
some
kind
of
special
bonus.
And
nearly
half
of
respondents
(49%)
expect
firms
to
use
this
opportunity
to
match
the
Milbank
summer
bonus.
Still,
not
everyone
is
convinced
anything
extra
will
be
offered:
31%
say
there
won’t
be
special
bonuses
and
7%
are
unsure.
Let’s
not
forget,
those
Milbank
special
summer
bonuses
ranged
from
$6,000
to
$25,000,
without
any
hourly
requirements
attached.
It’s
time
to
cross
your
fingers
and
hold
out
hope
that
this
bonus
season
will
be

extra

special.

For
those
of
you
who
are
wondering
when
your
bank
accounts
will
be
a
little
more
flush,
here’s
a
list
of
the
dates
when
year-end
market
bonuses
hit
Biglaw
since
2006,
the
very
first
year
Above
the
Law
started
publishing
bonus
news.
Take
a
look:

For
the
past
few
years,
since
2018,
bonus
announcements
had
been
made
in
early
to
mid-November
until
Cravath
stretched
the
timeline
by
a
smidge
in
2021.
Let’s
see
when
our
respondents
think
this
year’s
first
bonus
will
be
announced.


When
do
you
think
2024
bonuses
will
be
announced?

2024BonusAnnouncementPredictions

The
majority
of
respondents
(77%)
believe
that
bonuses
won’t
be
announced
until
mid-November
or
later.
The
most
popular
prediction
(selected
by
24%
of
associates)
is
the
week
before
Thanksgiving.
This
(sort
of)
lines
up
with
past
precedent
set
by
Cravath
in
recent
years

if
we
assume
that
Cravath
will
be
the
first
firm
on
bonuses
this
year,
that
is.

In
the
past,
Cravath
announced
its
bonus
news
on
either
the
last
Monday
in
November
or
the
first
Monday
in
the
first
week
of
December.
But
with
other
firms
in
the
mix

will
Milbank
or
Baker
McKenzie
try
to
announce
first
again
this
year?

it’s
really
hard
to
say
what
will
happen.
There
may
be
no
rhyme
nor
reason
when
it
comes
to
this
year’s
big
bonus
announcements.

While
associates
are
busy
counting
down
the
hours
until
Bonus
Day,
they’re
likely
even
busier
counting
up
the
hours
they’re
on
track
to
bill
in
2024
to
meet
bonus
eligibility
targets.
Just
how
much
are
associates
billing
now?
The
answer
is…
nearly
as
much
as
they
billed
last
year.
Here
are
the
full
survey
results.


How
many
hours
are
you
on
track
to
bill
in
2024?

2024BillableHoursExpected

The
largest
group
of
associates
(24%)
said
they
are
on
track
to
bill
between
2000
and
2099
hours
this
year.
Nearly
half
(47%)
expect
to
bill
even
more.
While
these
figures
are
similar
to
those
reported
in
2023,
more
respondents
this
year
said
they
expect
to
bill
at
least
2400
hours
(16%
vs
10%
in
2023).
Bill,
baby,
bill

and
hope
for
even
bigger
bonuses!
Associates
tell
us
that
some
firms
are
offering
special
perks
for
their
hard
work,
with
the
most
commonly
reported
incentive
is
an
above-market
bonus
for
high
billers.
A
few
associates
reported
other
kinds
of
perks
like
a
reduced
work
schedule,
origination
credit,
and
“unplugged
time.”

Check
back
in
with
us
on
bonuses
soon,
because
Biglaw
associates
are
looking
forward
to
their
bank
accounts
being
stuffed
like
the
Thanksgiving
turkeys
they’ll
gobble
down
at
the
end
of
next
month.

Remember
everyone,
we
depend
on
your
tips
to
stay
on
top
of
important
bonus
updates,
so
when
your
firm
announces
or
matches,
please
text
us
(646-820-8477)
or email
us
 (subject
line:
“[Firm
Name]
Bonus/Matches”).
Please
include
the
memo
if
available.
You
can
take
a
photo
of
the
memo
and
send
it
via
text
or
email
if
you
don’t
want
to
forward
the
original
PDF
or
Word
file.

And
if
you’d
like
to
sign
up
for
ATL’s
Bonus
Alerts
(which
is
the
alert
list
we
also
use
for
salary
announcements),
please
scroll
down
and
enter
your
email
address
in
the
box
below
this
post.
If
you
previously
signed
up
for
the
bonus
alerts,
you
don’t
need
to
do
anything.
You’ll
receive
an
email
notification
within
minutes
of
each
bonus
announcement
that
we
publish.
Thanks
for
your
help!



Staci ZaretskyStaci
Zaretsky
 is
a
senior
editor
at
Above
the
Law,
where
she’s
worked
since
2011.
She’d
love
to
hear
from
you,
so
please
feel
free
to

email

her
with
any
tips,
questions,
comments,
or
critiques.
You
can
follow
her
on

X/Twitter

and

Threads

or
connect
with
her
on

LinkedIn
.


Bonus Time

Enter
your
email
address
to
sign
up
for
ATL’s

Bonus
&
Salary
Increase
Alerts
.


Solos & Small Firm Lawyers: Have You Taken Our Compensation Survey Yet? – Above the Law

If
you
are
a
lawyer
at
a
law
firm
employing
50
or
fewer
attorneys,
please take
this

brief,
completely
confidential
survey
.

The
2023
survey
collected
information
from
more
than
1,000
attorneys,
and
we
hope
to
top
that
number
this
year.

The

ATL
Solo
&
Small
Firm
Compensation
Report

offers
detailed
information
about
attorney
pay.
With
breakdowns
by
region,
firm
size,
practice
area,
gender,
and
more,
the
report
is
an
invaluable
benchmarking
resource
for
lawyers
working
in
small
practices.
And
we
need
your
help
to
put
it
together!

As
always,
the
survey
is
both
short
and
anonymous.


button_take-the-survey

Ranking The Law Firms Lawyers Love – Above the Law

As
we
enter
the
fall
of
2024,
the
legal
industry
and
lateral
market
are
demonstrating
remarkable
resilience
and
adaptability
amid
ongoing
economic
challenges.

But
even
as
trends
shift,
what
factors
most
motivate
a
lateral
move?
And
which
firms
most
embody
these
traits?

Above
the
Law,
in
partnership
with

Lateral
Link
,
surveyed
more
than
700
attorneys
this
summer
for
insights
into
the
lateral
market.

Survey
respondents
were
asked
to
share
which
law
firm’s
offer
they
would
most
want
to
accept,
and
why
they
would
find
this
firm
appealing.

Respondents
also
weighed
in
on
their
career
goals
and
how
they
feel
about
their
own
lateral
prospects.


Download
the
free
report
below
to
see
if
your
firm
made
the
list.


Report
downloaders
may
be
eligible
to
receive
a
$10,000
Placement
Bonus
from
Lateral
Link
if
they
make
a
lateral
move
by
December
31,
2025,
contingent
upon
a
few
simple
requirements:



  • You
    are
    open
    to
    Lateral
    Link
    contacting
    you
    for
    a
    potential
    lateral
    placement
    in
    the
    United
    States
    or
    Asia;


  • You
    are
    placed
    through
    Lateral
    Link
    by
    December
    31,
    2025
    at
    an
    Am
    Law
    200
    law
    firm
    with
    a
    base
    salary
    of
    at
    least
    $200,000;
    and


  • You
    remain
    at
    your
    new
    Am
    Law
    200
    law
    firm
    for
    at
    least
    twelve
    months
    from
    your
    start
    date.   



Download
Now



By
filling
out
the
form
you
are
opting
in
to
receive
communication
from
Above
the
Law
and
its
partners.



About
Lateral
Link



With
a
presence
in
over
a
dozen
cities
across
the
United
States
and
Asia,
Lateral
Link
boasts
an
expert
recruiting
team
of
former
practicing
attorneys
dedicated
to
sourcing
top-tier
legal
talent
for
a
diverse
clientele,
which
includes
major
international
law
firms
and
Fortune
500
companies.
With
a
proven
track
record
of
tens
of
thousands
of
successful
placements,
Lateral
Link
specializes
in
connecting
exceptional
candidates
with
opportunities
in
the
legal
industry.



Don’t
just
take
their
word
for
it;
take
the
word
of
one
of
their
clients:




“When
it
comes
to
recruiting,
we
are
among
the
most
demanding
firms
in
the
U.S.
Lateral
Link
pre-screens
candidates
and
finds
us
people
with
the
credentials
we
require

without
exception.”

Hiring
Partner:
Quinn
Emanuel,
LLP.



Lateral
Link
looks
forward
to
working
with
you
to
make
a
successful
lateral
placement!

Layoffs Are Headed For Public Interest Attorneys In Northern California – Above the Law

Folks
in
the
Northern
California
office
of
the
American
Civil
Liberties
Union
are
busy
prepping.
They’ve
got
more
on
their
mind
than
just
their
latest
legal
battles

there
are
layoffs
on
the
horizon.

Earlier
this
month,
October
18th,
the
executive
director
of
the
ACLU
in
Northern
California
announced
a
major
change
was
coming
to
the
office.
According
to
insiders
at
the
office,
they’re
“restructuring.”
That
corporate
speaks
translates
to
“eliminating
whole
program
areas
they’ve
had
a
decades-long
commitment
to”
as
well
as
“consolidating
other
subject
areas.”
All
of
which
means
staff
and
attorneys
will
be
shown
the
door.

From
a
tipster:

This
week
it
was
announced
there
will
be
significant
layoffs
across
the
organization,
including
multiple
attorneys.
No
numbers
or
timelines
yet
but
this
is
moving
very
fast
and
the
Board
will
vote
on
(and
very
likely
approve)
the
restructuring
on
11/14.
We
are
unionized
and
expect
the
45-day
layoff
notice
right
around
11/15.
The
process
by
which
this
was
done
was
horrible
and
it’s
clear
they
are
actively
working
to
push
out
long
time
staff
in
the
legal
department.

Above
the
Law
reached
out
the
ACLU
of
NorCal
for
comment,
but
they
did
not
provide
one.

Hopefully
the
scope
of
the
layoffs
is
less
dire
than
the
insiders
suspect.

If
your
firm
or
organization
is
reducing
the
ranks
of
its
lawyers
or
staff,
whether
through
deferrals,
open
layoffs,
stealth
layoffs,
or
voluntary
buyouts,
please
don’t
hesitate
to
let
us
know.
Our
vast
network
of
tipsters
is
part
of
what
makes
Above
the
Law
thrive.
You
can email
us
 or
text
us
(646-820-8477).
Thank
you
for
your
assistance.

If
you’d
like
to
sign
up
for
ATL’s
Layoff
Alerts,
please
scroll
down
and
enter
your
email
address
in
the
box
below
this
post.
If
you
previously
signed
up
for
the
layoff
alerts,
you
don’t
need
to
do
anything.
You’ll
receive
an
email
notification
within
minutes
of
each
layoff
announcement
that
we
publish.




Kathryn Rubino HeadshotKathryn
Rubino
is
a
Senior
Editor
at
Above
the
Law,
host
of

The
Jabot
podcast
,
and
co-host
of

Thinking
Like
A
Lawyer
.
AtL
tipsters
are
the
best,
so
please
connect
with
her.
Feel
free
to
email

her

with
any
tips,
questions,
or
comments
and
follow
her
on
Twitter

@Kathryn1
 or
Mastodon

@[email protected].

Scissors Cut Money

Enter
your
email
address
to
sign
up
for

ATL’s
Layoff
Alerts
.

Strict Abortion Laws Are Likely Already Having An Economic Impact – MedCity News

Being
a
partner
of

HLTH

means
MedCity
News
gets
to
bring
programming
to
the
conference
annually.
So
it
was
this
year
with
our
ENGAGE
at
HLTH
forum
on
Sunday,
where
we
carefully
curated
a
panel
of
experts
who
discussed
three
topics:
cybersecurity,
strict
abortion
measures,
and
where
primary
care
can
truly
thrive

in
retail
settings
or
traditional
sites
of
care.

The
panel
that
I
moderated
explored
the
fact
that
strict
abortion
measures
aren’t
just
negatively
impacting
women’s
health.
There’s
a
definite
economic
impact
too,
the
true
effect
of
which
may
as
yet
be
known.

Take
New
Mexico,
for
instance,
said
Dr.
Irene
Agostini,
an
emergency
medicine
physician
at
the
University
of
New
Mexico
and
the
former
chief
medical
officer
of
the
University
of
New
Mexico
Hospital.
New
Mexico
allows
abortion
with
no
gestational
limits.

“What
we’ve
done
is
billboards
and
a
plan
that
we’ve
put
in
Texas
that
actually
recruits
doctors
to
New
Mexico
so
they
can
practice
in
a
state
where
it’s
safe
to
practice.
So
we
are
literally
recruiting
doctors
[through]
big
billboards
on
the
interstate
to
come
to
New
Mexico.”
Dr.
Agostini
said.

The
campaign
is
called

FreeToProvide

and
what
is
Texas’
loss
in
New
Mexico’s
gain.

“New
Mexico
is
a
poor
state,
and
we
need
physicians,
and
so
now
this
becomes
a
political
as
well
as
economic
argument.
Texas
is,
of
course,
very
unhappy
about
that,”
she
explained.

From
L-R,
Arundhati
Parmar,
Editor-in-Chief,
MedCity
News;
Atul
Grover,
Executive
Director,
Research
&
Action
Institute,
Association
of
American
Medical
Colleges
(AAMC);
Dr.
Irene
Agostini,
Former
CMO,
CMO-Liaison,
University
of
New
Mexico
Hospital;
Dr.
Robbie
Harriford,
Chief
Medical
Officer,
Samuel
U.
Rodgers
Health
Center

There
are
other
warning
signs
for
states
with
strict
abortion
measures
that
their
legislatures
put
in
place
once
the
Supreme
Court
threw
the
issue
of
abortion
limits
to
states
and
removed
federal
protections
when
it
overturned
Roe.

For
instance,
in
2022-2023
there
was
a
11.7%
decline
in
the
number
of
OBGYN
medical
residency
applications
in
abortion-banned
states
and
a
6.3%
decline
in
the
states
with
gestational
limits
on
abortion.
Compare
that
to
only
a
5.2%
decline
in
all
states
and
a
5.3%
decline
in
states
where
abortion
was
legal,
according
to
a
study
done
by
the
Association
of
American
Medical
Colleges
(AAMC).
Applications
fell
again
by
6.7%
in
2023-2024
in
the
states
with
complete
abortion
bans,
whereas
applications
rose
by
0.6%
in
all
states
and
0.4%
in
states
where
abortion
was
legal
in
the
same
time
period.

Atul
Grover,
executive
director,
Research
&
Action
Institute,
Association
of
American
Medical
Colleges
(AAMC)
pointed
out
that
the
decline
is
not
limited
to
OBGYN
residency
applications
alone.
For
instance,
Texas
in
2020-2021
experienced
a
4.5%
increase
in
senior
residency
applications
compared
to
the
previous
year.
But
in
2022-2023

immediately
after
the
state’s
ban
went
into
effect

applications
fell
by
5.4%
compared
to
the
previous
cycle.
The
decline
was
steeper
in
2023-2024,
with
an
11.7%
reduction
in
applications
from
2022-2023
cycle.

“Now,
this
data
is
just
a
snapshot
of
all
the,
you
know,
roughly
200
or
so
major
academic
health
systems
that
I
work
with,”
Grover
said
on
the
panel.
“It’s
about
a
three
quarters
of
a
trillion
dollars
in
economic
impact
yearly.
But
the
American
Medical
Association
does
these
periodic
studies
where
they
look
at
the
individual
economic
direct
and
indirect
impact
of
practicing
physicians
on
average,
and
it’s
about
a
$1
million
plus
dollars
a
year
that
each
physician
brings
to
the
community
in
terms
of
direct
economic
impact.
Indirect
impact
may
be
about
twice
as
much.
So
if
you
see
a
shift
of
100
physicians
moving
from
one
state
to
the
other,
if
you
think
about
that
being
$100
or
$200
million
impact
on
state
and
local
economies.”

There’s
also
the
fear
of
the
personal
financial
impact
of
being
sued
and
the
fear
that
their
professions
may
be
jeopardized.

“And
for
many
physicians,
they
didn’t
sign
up
for
that,
and
they
didn’t
sign
up
to
be
lawyers,”
Dr.
Agostini
declared.
“They
didn’t
sign
up
to
go
to
jail
to
practice
medicine.
So
they
can
either
stay
and
be
somewhat
warriors
in
those
states,
which
physicians
are
doing,
or
they
can
say,
‘You
know
what,
I
can’t
do
this.
I’m
going
to
leave,’
which
puts
everybody
at
risk
in
those
states….
That
will
be
a
problem
for
all
people
not
just
[those
in]
reproductive
health
years.
As
we
move
on
through
our
lives,
there
just
will
not
be
[enough]
physicians.”

Beyond
the
economic
impact
and
worsening
shortages
of
physicians
is
the
toll
on
women
and
reproductive
health
in
certain
parts
of
the
country.

“I’m
going
to
keep
bringing
this
up,
but
the
areas
of
the
country
that
have
the
biggest
maternity
deserts
are
also
the
ones
that
are
banning
abortions,”
said
Dr.
Robbie
Harriford,
chief
medical
officer,
Samuel
U.
Rodgers
Health
Center,
a
Federally
Qualified
Health
Center.

Harriford
sits
in
Kansas
City,
Missouri
at
the
border
of
two
states

Kansas,
where
abortion
is
legal
due
to
a
ballot
measure
residents
passed
in
2022
and
Missouri,
where
it
is
illegal
with
no
exceptions
for
rape
or
incest.
Missourians
however
will
get
to
weigh
in
on
a
ballot
measure
supporting
the
procedure
in
this
year’s
elections.

Grover
echoed
Harris’
thoughts
about
the
areas
of
the
country
that
have
enacted
strict
abortion
measures
and
therefore
further
worsening
a
physician
shortage.

“Wyoming,
Mississippi,
Idaho,
it’s
not
like
they
have
plenty
of
doctors
there
that
they
can
afford
to
lose,”
he
said.

Morning Docket: 10.29.24 – Above the Law

(Photo
by
Stephanie
Keith/Getty
Images)

*
Ready
and
rested
Steve
Bannon
is
out
of
prison.
Check
to
see
if
he
has
any
new
tattoos!
[

NBC]

*
Pay
guarantees
are
back
at
firms
unwilling
to
lose
out
on
lateral
partners
thinking
the
grass
may
not
be
greener.
[American
Lawyer
]

*
Second
Circuit
upholds
New
York
concealed
carry
law
after
Supreme
Court
showed


Bruen

buyer’s
remorse
.
[ABA
Journal
]

*
Subway
sandwiches
may
no
longer
be
footlongs
or
$5
and
now
a
lawsuit
claims
they
might
be
short
of
meat.
[Reuters]

*
New
bid
from
Pennsylvania
Republicans
sets
the
stage
for
the
Supreme
Court
to
seize
control
of
the
election…
if
justices
want
to
take
it.
[Vox]

*
Ninth
Circuit
delivers
victory
to
opponents
of
forced
arbitration.
[Law360]

*
In
unsurprising
news,
there’s
a
hefty
statistical
uptick
in
infant
mortality
following
the
Supreme
Court’s

Dobbs

decision.
[Balls
and
Strikes
]