Trump Campaign Cries Voter Suppression, Scores Win For… Ballot Access? – Above the Law

A
week
ago,
Trump

explained

to
podcaster
Joe
Rogan
that
the
2020
election
was
stolen
because
courts
improperly
expanded
access
to
the
ballot.

“They
were
supposed
to
get
legislative
approval
to
do
the
things
they
did,
and
they
didn’t
get
it
in
many
cases,
They
didn’t
get
it,”
the
former
president
rambled.
“Like
for
extensions
of
the
voting,
for
voting
earlier.
All
these.
different
things,
By
law,
they
had
to
get
legislative
approvals.
You
don’t
have
to
go
any
further
than
that.”

Naturally,
Trump
didn’t
invoke
the
words
“independent
state
legislature
theory”

too
many
syllables,
and
he
likely
doesn’t
even
understand
what
it
is.
But
his
point
was
pretty
much
the
definition
of
the
ISL,
which
has
taken
hold
in
the
GOP
since
their
fraud
claims
fizzled
out.
They
insist
that
court
orders
and
actions
taken
by
election
officials
to
expand
access
to
the
ballot
violate
the
Constitution’s
Elections
Clause,
which
provides
that
“The
Times,
Places
and
Manner
of
holding
Elections
for
Senators
and
Representatives,
shall
be
prescribed
in
each
State
by
the
Legislature
thereof;
but
the
Congress
may
at
any
time
by
Law
make
or
alter
such
Regulations,
except
as
to
the
Places
of
chusing
Senators.”

ISL
has
its
roots
in

Bush
v.
Gore
,
in
which
the
Rehnquist
Court
opined
that
each
state
legislature’s
authority
was
“plenary,”
and
it
could
even
cancel
elections
and
simply
award
electoral
votes
as
it
saw
fit.
A
few
Republican
politicians,
such
as
Maryland’s
Rep.
Andy
Harris,
are
now
openly
advocating
for
state
legislatures
to
do
just
that
this
cycle.
But
most
have
retreated
to

mumbling

like
House
Majority
Leader
Steve
Scalise
that
“There
were
a
few
states
that
did
not
follow
their
state
laws.
That’s
really
the
dispute
that
you’ve
seen
continue
on.”

And
yet
the
RNC
has
zero
problem
running
to
the
courts
to
get
them
to
change
the
rules
set
out
by
the
legislature
when
it’s
their
voters
(maybe!)
getting
the
short
end
of
the
stick.

The
issue
arose
in
Bucks
County,
where
there
were
long
lines
on
the
last
day
to
register
and
vote
absentee.

The
state
does
not
permit
in-person
early
voting,
but
it
does

allow

voters
to
fill
out
an
absentee
ballot
in
person
and
return
it
immediately.
That
process
requires
several
minutes
of
interface
with
election
clerks
for
every
ballot,
though,
and
takes
substantially
longer
than
simply
walking
in
and
voting
on
a
machine.
It
should
be
noted
that
this
logjam
was
virtually
guaranteed
by
Republican
state
legislators,
who
refuse
to
make
it
easier
to
cast
a
ballot
in
the
Commonwealth;
and
by
Republicans,
who
fearmonger
about
drop
boxes
so
aggressively
that
their
own
voters
are
terrified
to
use
them.

By

statute
,
the
last
day
to
request
an
absentee
ballot
is
seven
days
before
the
election,
i.e.
Tuesday
October
29.
According
to
the


Philadelphia
Inquirer
,
election
officials
in
Bucks
County
told
voters
who
were
in
line
by
2:30
on
Tuesday
that
they
could
fill
out
the
forms
and
cast
their
absentee
ballots
that
day.
Everyone
who
was
in
line
by
5
could
request
a
ballot
and
either
receive
it
by
mail
or
pick
it
up
later
in
the
week.
But
that
didn’t
stop
Republicans
from
claiming
that
the
long
lines
were
evidence
of
an
effort
to
suppress
the
votes
of
Trump
supporters.

Here’s
RNC
Chair
Michael
Whatley,
along
with
Val
Biancaniello,
a
PA
GOP
official
in
Delaware
County
who

got
herself
arrested

for
harassing
voters
in
line
to
cast
absentee
ballots
on
Monday.

https://x.com/ChairmanWhatley/status/1851393618365362352

In
2020,
President
Biden
took
63
percent
of
the
vote
in
Delaware
County,
and
52
percent
in
Bucks
County.
Nevertheless,
Whatley

tweeted

that
Biancaniello’s
arrest
“follows
reports
from
across
the
commonwealth
that
voters
are
being
turned
away
in
conservative
areas.”

The
RNC
and
the
Trump
campaign
characterized
attempts
to
manage
the
line
of
voters
as
“voter
suppression,”
and
they
filed

suit

in
the
Bucks
County
Court
of
Common
Pleas
alleging
that
officials
had
violated
the
law
by
not
allowing
everyone
in
line
by
5
to
cast
their
vote
on
site
that
day.
The

statute
,
and
indeed
the
complaint
itself,
are
a
little
unclear
as
to
whether
voters
have
the
right
to
vote
absentee
in
person,
or
simply
to
request
the
ballot
by
the
deadline.
But
the
petitioners
got
their
wish,
with
Judge
Jeffrey
Trauger
granting
a

preliminary
injunction

ordering
election
officials
to
continue
to
process
and
accept
absentee
ballot
requests
through
November
1.

Because
sending
out
absentee
ballots
requests
to
all
voters,
accepting
ballots
in
the
park,
ballot
drop
boxes,
and
court-mandated
voting
modifications
during
a
pandemic
are
illegal.
But
having
a
court
order
two
more
days
of
early
voting
is
totally
kosher.
And
Trump
will
explain
that
fine
distinction
to
Joe
Rogan
when
he
runs
again
in
2028.





Liz
Dye
 lives
in
Baltimore
where
she
produces
the
Law
and
Chaos substack and podcast.

Trump Campaign Cries Voter Suppression, Scores Win For… Ballot Access? – Above the Law

A
week
ago,
Trump

explained

to
podcaster
Joe
Rogan
that
the
2020
election
was
stolen
because
courts
improperly
expanded
access
to
the
ballot.

“They
were
supposed
to
get
legislative
approval
to
do
the
things
they
did,
and
they
didn’t
get
it
in
many
cases,
They
didn’t
get
it,”
the
former
president
rambled.
“Like
for
extensions
of
the
voting,
for
voting
earlier.
All
these.
different
things,
By
law,
they
had
to
get
legislative
approvals.
You
don’t
have
to
go
any
further
than
that.”

Naturally,
Trump
didn’t
invoke
the
words
“independent
state
legislature
theory”

too
many
syllables,
and
he
likely
doesn’t
even
understand
what
it
is.
But
his
point
was
pretty
much
the
definition
of
the
ISL,
which
has
taken
hold
in
the
GOP
since
their
fraud
claims
fizzled
out.
They
insist
that
court
orders
and
actions
taken
by
election
officials
to
expand
access
to
the
ballot
violate
the
Constitution’s
Elections
Clause,
which
provides
that
“The
Times,
Places
and
Manner
of
holding
Elections
for
Senators
and
Representatives,
shall
be
prescribed
in
each
State
by
the
Legislature
thereof;
but
the
Congress
may
at
any
time
by
Law
make
or
alter
such
Regulations,
except
as
to
the
Places
of
chusing
Senators.”

ISL
has
its
roots
in

Bush
v.
Gore
,
in
which
the
Rehnquist
Court
opined
that
each
state
legislature’s
authority
was
“plenary,”
and
it
could
even
cancel
elections
and
simply
award
electoral
votes
as
it
saw
fit.
A
few
Republican
politicians,
such
as
Maryland’s
Rep.
Andy
Harris,
are
now
openly
advocating
for
state
legislatures
to
do
just
that
this
cycle.
But
most
have
retreated
to

mumbling

like
House
Majority
Leader
Steve
Scalise
that
“There
were
a
few
states
that
did
not
follow
their
state
laws.
That’s
really
the
dispute
that
you’ve
seen
continue
on.”

And
yet
the
RNC
has
zero
problem
running
to
the
courts
to
get
them
to
change
the
rules
set
out
by
the
legislature
when
it’s
their
voters
(maybe!)
getting
the
short
end
of
the
stick.

The
issue
arose
in
Bucks
County,
where
there
were
long
lines
on
the
last
day
to
register
and
vote
absentee.

The
state
does
not
permit
in-person
early
voting,
but
it
does

allow

voters
to
fill
out
an
absentee
ballot
in
person
and
return
it
immediately.
That
process
requires
several
minutes
of
interface
with
election
clerks
for
every
ballot,
though,
and
takes
substantially
longer
than
simply
walking
in
and
voting
on
a
machine.
It
should
be
noted
that
this
logjam
was
virtually
guaranteed
by
Republican
state
legislators,
who
refuse
to
make
it
easier
to
cast
a
ballot
in
the
Commonwealth;
and
by
Republicans,
who
fearmonger
about
drop
boxes
so
aggressively
that
their
own
voters
are
terrified
to
use
them.

By

statute
,
the
last
day
to
request
an
absentee
ballot
is
seven
days
before
the
election,
i.e.
Tuesday
October
29.
According
to
the


Philadelphia
Inquirer
,
election
officials
in
Bucks
County
told
voters
who
were
in
line
by
2:30
on
Tuesday
that
they
could
fill
out
the
forms
and
cast
their
absentee
ballots
that
day.
Everyone
who
was
in
line
by
5
could
request
a
ballot
and
either
receive
it
by
mail
or
pick
it
up
later
in
the
week.
But
that
didn’t
stop
Republicans
from
claiming
that
the
long
lines
were
evidence
of
an
effort
to
suppress
the
votes
of
Trump
supporters.

Here’s
RNC
Chair
Michael
Whatley,
along
with
Val
Biancaniello,
a
PA
GOP
official
in
Delaware
County
who

got
herself
arrested

for
harassing
voters
in
line
to
cast
absentee
ballots
on
Monday.

https://x.com/ChairmanWhatley/status/1851393618365362352

In
2020,
President
Biden
took
63
percent
of
the
vote
in
Delaware
County,
and
52
percent
in
Bucks
County.
Nevertheless,
Whatley

tweeted

that
Biancaniello’s
arrest
“follows
reports
from
across
the
commonwealth
that
voters
are
being
turned
away
in
conservative
areas.”

The
RNC
and
the
Trump
campaign
characterized
attempts
to
manage
the
line
of
voters
as
“voter
suppression,”
and
they
filed

suit

in
the
Bucks
County
Court
of
Common
Pleas
alleging
that
officials
had
violated
the
law
by
not
allowing
everyone
in
line
by
5
to
cast
their
vote
on
site
that
day.
The

statute
,
and
indeed
the
complaint
itself,
are
a
little
unclear
as
to
whether
voters
have
the
right
to
vote
absentee
in
person,
or
simply
to
request
the
ballot
by
the
deadline.
But
the
petitioners
got
their
wish,
with
Judge
Jeffrey
Trauger
granting
a

preliminary
injunction

ordering
election
officials
to
continue
to
process
and
accept
absentee
ballot
requests
through
November
1.

Because
sending
out
absentee
ballots
requests
to
all
voters,
accepting
ballots
in
the
park,
ballot
drop
boxes,
and
court-mandated
voting
modifications
during
a
pandemic
are
illegal.
But
having
a
court
order
two
more
days
of
early
voting
is
totally
kosher.
And
Trump
will
explain
that
fine
distinction
to
Joe
Rogan
when
he
runs
again
in
2028.





Liz
Dye
 lives
in
Baltimore
where
she
produces
the
Law
and
Chaos substack and podcast.

Trump Campaign Cries Voter Suppression, Scores Win For… Ballot Access? – Above the Law

A
week
ago,
Trump

explained

to
podcaster
Joe
Rogan
that
the
2020
election
was
stolen
because
courts
improperly
expanded
access
to
the
ballot.

“They
were
supposed
to
get
legislative
approval
to
do
the
things
they
did,
and
they
didn’t
get
it
in
many
cases,
They
didn’t
get
it,”
the
former
president
rambled.
“Like
for
extensions
of
the
voting,
for
voting
earlier.
All
these.
different
things,
By
law,
they
had
to
get
legislative
approvals.
You
don’t
have
to
go
any
further
than
that.”

Naturally,
Trump
didn’t
invoke
the
words
“independent
state
legislature
theory”

too
many
syllables,
and
he
likely
doesn’t
even
understand
what
it
is.
But
his
point
was
pretty
much
the
definition
of
the
ISL,
which
has
taken
hold
in
the
GOP
since
their
fraud
claims
fizzled
out.
They
insist
that
court
orders
and
actions
taken
by
election
officials
to
expand
access
to
the
ballot
violate
the
Constitution’s
Elections
Clause,
which
provides
that
“The
Times,
Places
and
Manner
of
holding
Elections
for
Senators
and
Representatives,
shall
be
prescribed
in
each
State
by
the
Legislature
thereof;
but
the
Congress
may
at
any
time
by
Law
make
or
alter
such
Regulations,
except
as
to
the
Places
of
chusing
Senators.”

ISL
has
its
roots
in

Bush
v.
Gore
,
in
which
the
Rehnquist
Court
opined
that
each
state
legislature’s
authority
was
“plenary,”
and
it
could
even
cancel
elections
and
simply
award
electoral
votes
as
it
saw
fit.
A
few
Republican
politicians,
such
as
Maryland’s
Rep.
Andy
Harris,
are
now
openly
advocating
for
state
legislatures
to
do
just
that
this
cycle.
But
most
have
retreated
to

mumbling

like
House
Majority
Leader
Steve
Scalise
that
“There
were
a
few
states
that
did
not
follow
their
state
laws.
That’s
really
the
dispute
that
you’ve
seen
continue
on.”

And
yet
the
RNC
has
zero
problem
running
to
the
courts
to
get
them
to
change
the
rules
set
out
by
the
legislature
when
it’s
their
voters
(maybe!)
getting
the
short
end
of
the
stick.

The
issue
arose
in
Bucks
County,
where
there
were
long
lines
on
the
last
day
to
register
and
vote
absentee.

The
state
does
not
permit
in-person
early
voting,
but
it
does

allow

voters
to
fill
out
an
absentee
ballot
in
person
and
return
it
immediately.
That
process
requires
several
minutes
of
interface
with
election
clerks
for
every
ballot,
though,
and
takes
substantially
longer
than
simply
walking
in
and
voting
on
a
machine.
It
should
be
noted
that
this
logjam
was
virtually
guaranteed
by
Republican
state
legislators,
who
refuse
to
make
it
easier
to
cast
a
ballot
in
the
Commonwealth;
and
by
Republicans,
who
fearmonger
about
drop
boxes
so
aggressively
that
their
own
voters
are
terrified
to
use
them.

By

statute
,
the
last
day
to
request
an
absentee
ballot
is
seven
days
before
the
election,
i.e.
Tuesday
October
29.
According
to
the


Philadelphia
Inquirer
,
election
officials
in
Bucks
County
told
voters
who
were
in
line
by
2:30
on
Tuesday
that
they
could
fill
out
the
forms
and
cast
their
absentee
ballots
that
day.
Everyone
who
was
in
line
by
5
could
request
a
ballot
and
either
receive
it
by
mail
or
pick
it
up
later
in
the
week.
But
that
didn’t
stop
Republicans
from
claiming
that
the
long
lines
were
evidence
of
an
effort
to
suppress
the
votes
of
Trump
supporters.

Here’s
RNC
Chair
Michael
Whatley,
along
with
Val
Biancaniello,
a
PA
GOP
official
in
Delaware
County
who

got
herself
arrested

for
harassing
voters
in
line
to
cast
absentee
ballots
on
Monday.

https://x.com/ChairmanWhatley/status/1851393618365362352

In
2020,
President
Biden
took
63
percent
of
the
vote
in
Delaware
County,
and
52
percent
in
Bucks
County.
Nevertheless,
Whatley

tweeted

that
Biancaniello’s
arrest
“follows
reports
from
across
the
commonwealth
that
voters
are
being
turned
away
in
conservative
areas.”

The
RNC
and
the
Trump
campaign
characterized
attempts
to
manage
the
line
of
voters
as
“voter
suppression,”
and
they
filed

suit

in
the
Bucks
County
Court
of
Common
Pleas
alleging
that
officials
had
violated
the
law
by
not
allowing
everyone
in
line
by
5
to
cast
their
vote
on
site
that
day.
The

statute
,
and
indeed
the
complaint
itself,
are
a
little
unclear
as
to
whether
voters
have
the
right
to
vote
absentee
in
person,
or
simply
to
request
the
ballot
by
the
deadline.
But
the
petitioners
got
their
wish,
with
Judge
Jeffrey
Trauger
granting
a

preliminary
injunction

ordering
election
officials
to
continue
to
process
and
accept
absentee
ballot
requests
through
November
1.

Because
sending
out
absentee
ballots
requests
to
all
voters,
accepting
ballots
in
the
park,
ballot
drop
boxes,
and
court-mandated
voting
modifications
during
a
pandemic
are
illegal.
But
having
a
court
order
two
more
days
of
early
voting
is
totally
kosher.
And
Trump
will
explain
that
fine
distinction
to
Joe
Rogan
when
he
runs
again
in
2028.





Liz
Dye
 lives
in
Baltimore
where
she
produces
the
Law
and
Chaos substack and podcast.

Acclaimed Trump Impeachment Lawyer Barry Berke Heads To Gibson Dunn Ahead Of Election 2024 – Above the Law

Barry
Berke
(Photo
by
JIM
WATSON/AFP
via
Getty
Images)

Prominent
trial
lawyer

Barry
Berke


also
known
as
“America’s
greatest
trial
lawyer”

is
leaving
Kramer
Levin
for
a
new
home
at
Gibson
Dunn,
where
he’ll
take
up
the
mantle
of
global
co-chair
of
the
Biglaw
firm’s
litigation
group.
Gibson
Dunn
brought
in
$3,074,016,000
gross
revenue
in
2023,
putting
it
at
No.
7
on
the
Am
Law
100
ranking.

As
noted
by
the

American
Lawyer
,
Berke
is
taking
his
entire
first-chair
trial
team,
including

Dani
James
,

Jordan
Estes
,

Darren
LaVerne
,
and

Mike
Martinez
,
as
well
as
his
book
of
business,
with
him
to
Gibson
Dunn.
This
is
a
real
rarity
in
the
legal
profession.
“We
were
not
looking,”
Berke
said
of
his
decision,
“but
they
came
to
us
and
made
the
case
for
why
this
would
be
a
great
move.”
The

New
York
Times’
DealBook

has
additional
information
on
why
Berke
decided
to
switch
firms:

Berke
was
partly
attracted
to
Gibson
Dunn
because
of
its
commitment
to
its
litigation
practice.
Many
firms
now
use
the
business
more
as
a
broader
service
for
corporate
clients.
Gibson
Dunn
has
its
own
high-profile
track
record
in
litigation,
having
successfully
defended
same-sex
marriage
for
Californians
before
the
Supreme
Court
and
Walmart
in
a
gender
discrimination
lawsuit.

“The
firm
was
very
clear
to
us
how
important
their
litigation
trial
practice
is,”
Berke,
60,
told
DealBook.
He
was
recruited
by

Orin
Snyder
,
one
of
the
top
litigators
in
the
country.
Among
the
lawyers
he
will
work
with
is
Ted
Olson,
one
of
the
country’s
leading
appellate
and
constitutional
law
lawyers.

Having
both
Berke
and
Snyder
will
help
cement
Gibson
Dunn’s
spot
as
a
top
litigation
shop,
and
will
solidify
its
leading
position
for
firms
doing
pro
bono
work.


Barbara
Becker
,
Gibson
Dunn’s
chair
and
managing
partner
of
Gibson
Dunn,

welcomed

Berke
and
his
trial
team
with
open
arms,
“Our
firm’s
preeminent
litigation
platform
is
an
important
part
of
our
identity,
and
we
are
proud
to
welcome
Barry
and
the
team
as
we
continue
to
build
on
this
legacy.”
She
went
on
to
praise
the
outstanding
litigators,
saying,
“With
their
extensive
experience
across
a
wide
range
of
litigation
and
investigative
matters,
this
stellar
group
is
a
natural
fit
for
Gibson
Dunn.
We
are
thrilled
to
begin
our
work
together
in
service
of
clients
around
the
globe.”

Berke
is
perhaps
best
known
on
a
national
stage
for
his
roles
as
impeachment
special
counsel
and
chief
impeachment
counsel
during
the
2019
and
2021
impeachment
trials
of
former
President
Donald
Trump,
and
his
lateral
move
ahead
of
the
2024
election
could
not
be
more
timely.
It
is
highly
likely
that
the
results
of
the
election
will
be
challenged
in
court,
and
Berke
is
well
aware
of
that
fact.
“It
is
fair
to
say
that
people
are
very
focused

and
have
discussed
with
me

the
concerns
that
legal
issues
may
again
predominate
following
the
voting
on
Nov.
5,”
he
told
DealBook.

For
her
part,
Becker
said
the
timing
of
Berke’s
decision
to
come
to
Gibson
Dunn
was
merely
coincidental,
noting
that
in
the
wake
of
the
election,
“there
could
be
opportunities,
depending
on
how
things
shake
out.”

Congratulations
to
Barry
Berke
on
his
move
to
Gibson
Dunn.
Best
wishes
for
much
continued
success!


A
star
of
the
corporate
defense
bar
jumps
ship

[DealBook
/
New
York
Times]

Barry
Berke
and
Partner
Group
Exits
Kramer
Levin
for
Gibson
Dunn

[American
Lawyer]

Gibson
Dunn
Grows
its
Powerhouse
Litigation
Practice
with
Acclaimed
Trial
Lawyer
Barry
Berke
&
Elite
Team

[Gibson
Dunn]



Staci ZaretskyStaci
Zaretsky
 is
a
senior
editor
at
Above
the
Law,
where
she’s
worked
since
2011.
She’d
love
to
hear
from
you,
so
please
feel
free
to

email

her
with
any
tips,
questions,
comments,
or
critiques.
You
can
follow
her
on

X/Twitter

and

Threads

or
connect
with
her
on

LinkedIn
.

MAGA Architect Of 2020 Election Denial Invited By American Bar Association To Give Election Law CLE – Above the Law

Over
the
last
eight
years,
a

lot
of
lawyers

lent
their
credibility
to
the
Donald
Trump/MAGA
takeover
of
the
country

often

to
their
professional
detriment
.
But
one
MAGA
attorney
seems
to
have
slipped
by
the
worst
backlash,
despite
his
prominent
role
in
creating
the
legal
framework
to
try
to
steal
the
results
of
the
2020
election
for
Trump.

I
am
referencing

Mark
Martin
.
The

dean
of
High
Point
University’s
law
school

was
previously
Chief
Justice
of
the
Supreme
Court
of
North
Carolina,
Associate
Judge
on
the
North
Carolina
Court
of
Appeals,
dean
and
professor
of
law
at
Regent
University
School
of
Law.
He
was
also
the
brains

behind

the
theory
that
the
Vice
President
could
just
choose
not
to
certify
the
election
results
on
January
6th.
Trump
told
Mike
Pence
he
“had
spoken
with
Mark
Martin,
the
former
chief
justice
of
the
North
Carolina
Supreme
Court,
who
he
said
had
told
him
that
Mr.
Pence
had
that
power
(to
reject
the
Electoral
College
votes
on
January
6th
2021).”
All
of
which
resulted
in
effigies
of
Pence
during
the
attempted
coup
that
day.

But
even
after
Martin’s
high-profile
role
in
trying
to
subvert
democracy
by
promulgating

piss-poor
legal
takes
,
his

legal
career
continued

apace.
Martin’s
problematic
role
in
2020
election
denial
and
subsequent
coup
has
been

so
consequence
free

for
him
that
he’s
now
being
touted
as
an
election
law
expert
by
none
other
that
the
American
Bar
Association.

That’s
right,
the
ABA,
which
has
a
number
of

election-related
resources
on
its
website
,
recently
recorded
a
CLE
entitled,

What
Judges
Should
Know
About
Election
Law


featuring
none
other
than
Martin.

How
embarrassing.

Screenshot 2024-10-30 at 12.19.11 PM

And
I’m
not
the
only
one
who
thinks
so.
Professor
Rick
Hasan

said
,
“Very
disappointing
to

see
this.

But
it
really
begs
the
question,
why
is
the
ABA
selling
out
its
credibility
on
this
issue?
This
feels
like
a
case
of

bothsideism

run
amuck.
The
other
panelists
were
Judge
Tani
Cantil-Sakauye
(officially
an
Independent,
but
appointed
by
Republican
California
Gov.

Arnold
Schwarzenegger
)
and
Minnesota’s
Judge
Peter
Reyes,
appointed
by
Democratic
Governor
Mark
Dayton,
so
that
far-right
MAGA
perspective
was
missing.
But…
isn’t
that
a
good
thing?
The
bunk
theory
that
Pence
could
just
appoint
Trump
president
in
2020
is
a
stain
on
American
history
generally,
and
even
more
so
on
those
committed
to
upholding
the
rule
of
law…
like,
you
know,
the
American
Bar
Association.

As
we
rapidly
approach
another
presidential
election

with

judicial
shenanigans
afoot


it’s
more
important
than
ever
to
understand
exactly
who
we
are
looking
to
as
our
experts
on
election
law.
In
the
wake
of
the
2020
election,
Martin
proved
he’ll
abandon
legal
principles
to
advance
a
partisan
goal.
It’s
downright
shameful
that
the
ABA
is
holding
him
up
as
someone
whose
opinions
matter

and
offering
continuing
legal
education
credits
for
listening
to
him.




Kathryn Rubino HeadshotKathryn
Rubino
is
a
Senior
Editor
at
Above
the
Law,
host
of

The
Jabot
podcast
,
and
co-host
of

Thinking
Like
A
Lawyer
.
AtL
tipsters
are
the
best,
so
please
connect
with
her.
Feel
free
to
email

her

with
any
tips,
questions,
or
comments
and
follow
her
on
Twitter

@Kathryn1
 or
Mastodon

@[email protected].

How Global Law Firms Are Bridging Cultures With AI – Above the Law

In
the
legal
profession,
where


cases
can
turn
on
the
interpretation
of
a
comma
,
global
organizations
need
the
highest-quality
tools
to
communicate
across
languages,
cultures,
and
markets.



Enter
DeepL
,
a
leading
global
Language
AI
company
offering
translation
and
writing
tools
used
by
over
100,000
businesses
and
governments
around
the
world
across
multiple
industries,
including
the
legal
field.

DeepL’s
AI
tools
have
become
a
critical
investment
for
companies
today,
addressing
a
variety
of
communication
challenges
ranging
from
internal
communications
between
teams
to
contract
drafting
and
legal
correspondence
support.

Here,
we
talk
with
Frankie
Williams,
DeepL’s
Chief
Legal
Officer,
who
sheds
light
on
how
law
firms
are
already
using
this
technology

and
how
AI
is
making
broader
inroads
in
the
industry.

Frankie Williams

Frankie
Williams


ATL:
You’ve
been
in
the
innovation
and
startup
world
for
several
years
now,
leading
multiple
companies
through
successful
IPOs,
but
you’ve
joined
DeepL
more
recently.
What
attracted
you
to
this
company
and
role? 

FW:
I
spent
just
over
a
decade
advising
clients
on
international
M&A
transactions,
and
in
2013
I
joined
King,
the
mobile
game
developer
that
makes
Candy
Crush

a
huge
culture
shock
after
so
many
years
in
law
firms!
We
listed
on
the
NYSE
in
2014
and
were
acquired
by
Activision
Blizzard
in
2016.
I
went
on
to
spend
over
five
years
at
luxury
ecommerce
platform
Farfetch,
including
working
on
the
group’s
restructuring
and
listing
on
the
NYSE
at
$5.8
in
September
2018.
During
those
years,
I
thrived
in
the
scaling
phase
of
building
teams
and
structures
to
mature,
which
is
what
attracted
me
to
DeepL.
I
was
also
drawn
to
DeepL
by
its
mission
to
break
down
language
barriers
for
businesses,
which
is
particularly
tangible
for
me
because
we
have
many
clients
who
are
legal
teams
and
law
firms.


Much
of
the
conventional
wisdom
in
legal
tech
is
that
2024
has
marked
a
transition
from
an
AI
hype
cycle
to
the
emergence
of
concrete
use
cases.
What
do
you
make
of
this
idea? 

This
is
a
trend
that
is
becoming
increasingly
evident
in
the
broader
context
of
AI
adoption
among
businesses
globally,
as
well
as
in
the
legal
industry
specifically.
There
has
been
a
growing
public
interest
in
AI,
particularly
in
the
last
year,
and
I
think
many
legal
leaders
are
now
realizing
that
the
real
value
of
AI
is
in
its
practical,
specific
applications
that
are
proven
to
address
real
challenges
and
improve
efficiency,
access,
and
decision-making.

Recent research from
LexisNexis
found
that
75%
of
the
legal
leaders
surveyed
have
used
generative
AI
tools,
either
personally
or
professionally,
with
many
believing
generative
AI
technology
will
decrease
costs
and
increase
revenue.
Lawyers
(me
included!)
are
certainly
becoming
more
comfortable
with
the
technology;
I
think
the
question
now
isn’t
whether
we
should
be
using
it,
but
rather,
which
AI
tools
will
dominate
in
the
legal
market.


Can
you
explain
the
benefits
of
AI
translation
and
writing
tools
for
lawyers
and
legal
firms?
What
challenges
do
these
tools
help
address
in
the
legal
field
today?

In
today’s
interconnected
world,
accurate
communication
is
more
important
than
ever.
DeepL
is
purpose-built
to
help
businesses
address
language
and
communication
challenges
with
our
suite
of
specialized
AI
translation
and
writing
services.

DeepL
addresses
several
common
challenges
faced
by
the
legal
sector,
including
understanding
information
in
non-native
languages,
translating
documents
accurately,
and
maintaining
high
writing
quality.
Our
legal
customers
use
DeepL
to
translate
and
process
contracts,
simplify
communication
with
clients
and
suppliers,
improve
internal
communication,
and
support
research
reports
and
publications.
By
enabling
more
accurate
and
precise
communication
with
clients
in
different
languages,
law
firms
can
improve
client
service
and
responsiveness.

For
in-house
legal
teams,
DeepL
is
also
used
for
the
creation
of
communications,
including
translated
compliance
documents,
policies
and
other
essential
materials,
aiding
understanding
and
compliance.
By
automating
routine
linguistic
tasks,
in-house
teams,
like
my
own,
can
increase
productivity
and
free
up
time
to
focus
on
strategic
initiatives
that
drive
greater
business
value.

According
to
our
customer
research,
the
vast
majority
of
legal
department
users
say
that
DeepL
speeds
up
their
work
and
improves
writing
quality.
A 2024
Forrester
Consulting
study
 found
that
one
legal
firm
using
DeepL
was
able
to
cut
the
time
spent
translating
a
two-
to
three-page
document
from
2-3
hours
to
under
15
minutes,
thanks
to
our
automation
and
document
upload
features.


Contract
drafting
and
other
legal
tasks
require
an
extreme
precision
of
language,
likely
beyond
that
required
by
just
about
any
other
profession.
How
does
AI
address
this
need
for
precision
in
translating
legal
documents
and
messages?

In
today’s
highly
litigious
world,
where
every
word
carries
significant
weight,
it
is
more
critical
than
ever
to
ensure
precision
in
translation
and
writing.
In
our
translation
quality
blind
tests
with
external
professional
translators
in
2024,
DeepL’s
translation
tools
were
preferred
over
competitors
at
a
rate
of
1.3x
more
than
Google
Translate,
1.7x
more
than
ChatGPT-4,
and
2.3x
more
than
Microsoft.
In
the
same
testing
DeepL
translations
required
2x
fewer
edits
than
Google
Translate
and
3x
fewer
edits
than
ChatGPT-4.

We
meet
the
need
for
precision
through
several
unique
capabilities:

  • Advanced,
    highly
    specialized
    large
    language
    model:
    The
    DeepL
    platform
    is
    built
    on
    next-generation
    LLM
    technology
    that
    is
    uniquely
    tuned
    for
    language,
    resulting
    in
    more
    human-like
    translations
    and
    writing
    for
    a
    variety
    of
    use
    cases
    with
    a
    reduced
    risk
    of
    hallucinations
    and
    misinformation.

  • Proprietary
    data
    for
    specific,
    contextual
    understanding:
    Unlike
    general
    purpose
    models
    that
    simply
    train
    on
    the
    public
    internet,
    the
    DeepL
    model
    leverages
    over
    seven
    years
    of
    proprietary
    data
    specifically
    tuned
    for
    content
    creation
    and
    translation.

  • Human
    model
    tutoring:
    With
    a
    focus
    on
    quality,
    the
    DeepL
    model
    leverages
    thousands
    of
    hand-picked
    language
    experts
    specifically
    trained
    to
    “tutor”
    the
    model
    to
    best-in-class
    translation.

Our
products
offer
extensive
customization
options.
Through
features
like
DeepL
glossaries,
legal
teams
can
tailor
translations
by
specifying
the
preferred
translations
of
words
and
phrases
for
specific
contexts.
We
recently
enhanced
our
glossary
functionality
to
include
the
industry’s
first
automatic
glossary
generator,
which
streamlines
the
translation
process
for
documents
containing
critical
brand
terms.
Our
translations
can
be
adjusted
to
align
with
the
desired
tone
of
voice,
depending
on
the
target
audience.


And
I
understand
DeepL
offers
more
than
just
AI-powered
translation
tools,
like
DeepL
Write.
Can
you
talk
about
these
other
DeepL
solutions,
and
how
lawyers
and
legal
firms
could
integrate
them
into
their
workflows? 

In
2017,
we
launched
our
flagship
product,
DeepL
Translate,
which
has
become
our
signature
product.
However,
we
continue
to
invest
heavily
in
research
and
innovation
to
build
out
our
capabilities.
In
April
this
year,
we
launched DeepL
Write
Pro
,
an
AI
writing
assistant
that
provides
writers
with
real-time
suggestions
on
phrasing,
style,
and
tone
while
understanding
the
context
of
business
communication.
DeepL
Write
Pro
acts
as
a
creative
assistant
to
writers
in
the
drafting
process,
elevating
their
text
with
real-time
AI-powered
suggestions
on
word
choice,
phrasing,
style
(simple,
business,
academic,
or
casual),
and
tone
(such
as
enthusiastic,
friendly,
confident,
or
diplomatic),
helping
to
ensure
the
professional
quality
of
writing,
enhancing
clarity
and
consistency.

A
lawyer’s
work
is
often
text-intensive.
I
find
DeepL
Write
Pro
an
invaluable
tool
that
enables
me
to
produce
precise,
high-quality,
and
consistent
writing
while
reducing
errors
and
improving
drafts.
I
particularly
like
the
new
“Shorten”
feature
which
helps
counter
my
lawyer
tendency
to
be
overly
verbose
to
ensure
my
communications
to
my
internal
clients
is
succinct
and
to
the
point.


Of
course,
security
concerns
are
at
the
core
of
using
AI
in
the
legal
industry.
Can
you
walk
us
through
some
of
DeepL’s
privacy
and
security
safeguards?
What
makes
Deepl
unique? 

The
protection
of
our
customers’
data
is
at
the
heart
of
DeepL’s
mission
and
product
offering.
Our
customer
base
is
diverse,
including
businesses
in
highly
regulated
sectors
such
as
financial
services
and
the
legal
industry,
and
ensuring
the
confidentiality
and
security
of
their
data
is
incredibly
important
to
us.
We
adhere
to
the
highest
enterprise-grade
privacy
and
security
standards
to
protect
user
data

these
include
state-of-the-art
data
encryption
and
the
General
Data
Protection
Regulation
(GDPR),
ISO
27001,
and
SOC
2
Type
2
standards.
We
do
not
use
any
text
from
our
subscribers
to
enhance
our
AI
models,
understanding
that
many
of
our
users
translate
sensitive
information.


Everyone
with
a
smartphone
can
download
Google
Translate
for
free
these
days,
getting
basic
language
translation
services.
What
does
a
more
sophisticated
service
like
DeepL
do
that
Google
Translate
cannot,
particularly
for
lawyers?
What
technology
powers
Deepl’s
advantages
here? 

While
the
free
general-purpose
translation
services
tools
you
mentioned
may
work
well
enough
for
casual
use
cases
like
talking
to
friends
or
reading
articles
in
other
languages,
DeepL
offers
specialized
AI-based
translation
and
writing
tools
that
are
secure,
sophisticated,
and
designed
specifically
for
business
and
corporate
use
cases
where
the
stakes
are
far
higher.
This
differentiation
is
critical
for
law
firms
and
legal
teams.

Unlike
general-purpose
AI
systems,
DeepL’s
cutting-edge
translation
and
writing
solutions
rely
on
specialized
AI
models
tuned
specifically
for
language

we
combine
the
expertise
of
world-class
AI
and
ML
research
and
engineering
with
the
knowledge
of
thousands
of
leading
linguists
to
uniquely
specialize
in
complex
language
tasks.
As
I
mentioned
earlier,
privacy
and
security
are
also
central
to
our
offering.
We
adhere
to
the
highest
standards
and
state-of-the-art
data
encryption,
which
are
always
priorities
for
our
legal
sector
customers.


Now,
aside
from
your
own
company,
what
new
applications
of
gen
AI
do
you
think
will
be
most
transformative
for
the
legal
industry
in
the
immediate
future?
And
do
you
have
any
long-term
predictions? 

I
am
very
excited
about
the
potential
of
AI
to
improve
the
ways
that
lawyers
work.
My
team
is
using
a
chatbot,
with
great
success,
to
answer
routine
and
repeated
questions
in
relation
to
our
customer
contracts
and
also
general
legal
questions
(particularly
successfully
in
fields
where
there
is
a
large
bank
of
law
and
guidance,
like
privacy)

saving
my
lawyers’
time
for
more
complex
and
strategic
work.
The
ability
to
extract
large
quantities
of
data
by
simply
uploading
documents
is
also
a
game
changer.
We
will
find
considerably
more
exciting
and
empowering
tasks
for
junior
lawyers
than
the
due
diligence
review
of
reams
of
contracts
to
which
I
was
subjected
in
the
early
2000s!

I
think
long-term
predictions
in
a
field
as
fast-moving
as
AI
are
inadvisable

when
I
was
a
junior
lawyer
the
sorts
of
tools
that
are
already
commonplace
would
have
looked
like
science
fiction!

Trump Campaign Cries Voter Suppression, Scores Win For… Ballot Access? – Above the Law

A
week
ago,
Trump

explained

to
podcaster
Joe
Rogan
that
the
2020
election
was
stolen
because
courts
improperly
expanded
access
to
the
ballot.

“They
were
supposed
to
get
legislative
approval
to
do
the
things
they
did,
and
they
didn’t
get
it
in
many
cases,
They
didn’t
get
it,”
the
former
president
rambled.
“Like
for
extensions
of
the
voting,
for
voting
earlier.
All
these.
different
things,
By
law,
they
had
to
get
legislative
approvals.
You
don’t
have
to
go
any
further
than
that.”

Naturally,
Trump
didn’t
invoke
the
words
“independent
state
legislature
theory”

too
many
syllables,
and
he
likely
doesn’t
even
understand
what
it
is.
But
his
point
was
pretty
much
the
definition
of
the
ISL,
which
has
taken
hold
in
the
GOP
since
their
fraud
claims
fizzled
out.
They
insist
that
court
orders
and
actions
taken
by
election
officials
to
expand
access
to
the
ballot
violate
the
Constitution’s
Elections
Clause,
which
provides
that
“The
Times,
Places
and
Manner
of
holding
Elections
for
Senators
and
Representatives,
shall
be
prescribed
in
each
State
by
the
Legislature
thereof;
but
the
Congress
may
at
any
time
by
Law
make
or
alter
such
Regulations,
except
as
to
the
Places
of
chusing
Senators.”

ISL
has
its
roots
in

Bush
v.
Gore
,
in
which
the
Rehnquist
Court
opined
that
each
state
legislature’s
authority
was
“plenary,”
and
it
could
even
cancel
elections
and
simply
award
electoral
votes
as
it
saw
fit.
A
few
Republican
politicians,
such
as
Maryland’s
Rep.
Andy
Harris,
are
now
openly
advocating
for
state
legislatures
to
do
just
that
this
cycle.
But
most
have
retreated
to

mumbling

like
House
Majority
Leader
Steve
Scalise
that
“There
were
a
few
states
that
did
not
follow
their
state
laws.
That’s
really
the
dispute
that
you’ve
seen
continue
on.”

And
yet
the
RNC
has
zero
problem
running
to
the
courts
to
get
them
to
change
the
rules
set
out
by
the
legislature
when
it’s
their
voters
(maybe!)
getting
the
short
end
of
the
stick.

The
issue
arose
in
Bucks
County,
where
there
were
long
lines
on
the
last
day
to
register
and
vote
absentee.

The
state
does
not
permit
in-person
early
voting,
but
it
does

allow

voters
to
fill
out
an
absentee
ballot
in
person
and
return
it
immediately.
That
process
requires
several
minutes
of
interface
with
election
clerks
for
every
ballot,
though,
and
takes
substantially
longer
than
simply
walking
in
and
voting
on
a
machine.
It
should
be
noted
that
this
logjam
was
virtually
guaranteed
by
Republican
state
legislators,
who
refuse
to
make
it
easier
to
cast
a
ballot
in
the
Commonwealth;
and
by
Republicans,
who
fearmonger
about
drop
boxes
so
aggressively
that
their
own
voters
are
terrified
to
use
them.

By

statute
,
the
last
day
to
request
an
absentee
ballot
is
seven
days
before
the
election,
i.e.
Tuesday
October
29.
According
to
the


Philadelphia
Inquirer
,
election
officials
in
Bucks
County
told
voters
who
were
in
line
by
2:30
on
Tuesday
that
they
could
fill
out
the
forms
and
cast
their
absentee
ballots
that
day.
Everyone
who
was
in
line
by
5
could
request
a
ballot
and
either
receive
it
by
mail
or
pick
it
up
later
in
the
week.
But
that
didn’t
stop
Republicans
from
claiming
that
the
long
lines
were
evidence
of
an
effort
to
suppress
the
votes
of
Trump
supporters.

Here’s
RNC
Chair
Michael
Whatley,
along
with
Val
Biancaniello,
a
PA
GOP
official
in
Delaware
County
who

got
herself
arrested

for
harassing
voters
in
line
to
cast
absentee
ballots
on
Monday.

https://x.com/ChairmanWhatley/status/1851393618365362352

In
2020,
President
Biden
took
63
percent
of
the
vote
in
Delaware
County,
and
52
percent
in
Bucks
County.
Nevertheless,
Whatley

tweeted

that
Biancaniello’s
arrest
“follows
reports
from
across
the
commonwealth
that
voters
are
being
turned
away
in
conservative
areas.”

The
RNC
and
the
Trump
campaign
characterized
attempts
to
manage
the
line
of
voters
as
“voter
suppression,”
and
they
filed

suit

in
the
Bucks
County
Court
of
Common
Pleas
alleging
that
officials
had
violated
the
law
by
not
allowing
everyone
in
line
by
5
to
cast
their
vote
on
site
that
day.
The

statute
,
and
indeed
the
complaint
itself,
are
a
little
unclear
as
to
whether
voters
have
the
right
to
vote
absentee
in
person,
or
simply
to
request
the
ballot
by
the
deadline.
But
the
petitioners
got
their
wish,
with
Judge
Jeffrey
Trauger
granting
a

preliminary
injunction

ordering
election
officials
to
continue
to
process
and
accept
absentee
ballot
requests
through
November
1.

Because
sending
out
absentee
ballots
requests
to
all
voters,
accepting
ballots
in
the
park,
ballot
drop
boxes,
and
court-mandated
voting
modifications
during
a
pandemic
are
illegal.
But
having
a
court
order
two
more
days
of
early
voting
is
totally
kosher.
And
Trump
will
explain
that
fine
distinction
to
Joe
Rogan
when
he
runs
again
in
2028.





Liz
Dye
 lives
in
Baltimore
where
she
produces
the
Law
and
Chaos substack and podcast.

Trump Campaign Cries Voter Suppression, Scores Win For… Ballot Access? – Above the Law

A
week
ago,
Trump

explained

to
podcaster
Joe
Rogan
that
the
2020
election
was
stolen
because
courts
improperly
expanded
access
to
the
ballot.

“They
were
supposed
to
get
legislative
approval
to
do
the
things
they
did,
and
they
didn’t
get
it
in
many
cases,
They
didn’t
get
it,”
the
former
president
rambled.
“Like
for
extensions
of
the
voting,
for
voting
earlier.
All
these.
different
things,
By
law,
they
had
to
get
legislative
approvals.
You
don’t
have
to
go
any
further
than
that.”

Naturally,
Trump
didn’t
invoke
the
words
“independent
state
legislature
theory”

too
many
syllables,
and
he
likely
doesn’t
even
understand
what
it
is.
But
his
point
was
pretty
much
the
definition
of
the
ISL,
which
has
taken
hold
in
the
GOP
since
their
fraud
claims
fizzled
out.
They
insist
that
court
orders
and
actions
taken
by
election
officials
to
expand
access
to
the
ballot
violate
the
Constitution’s
Elections
Clause,
which
provides
that
“The
Times,
Places
and
Manner
of
holding
Elections
for
Senators
and
Representatives,
shall
be
prescribed
in
each
State
by
the
Legislature
thereof;
but
the
Congress
may
at
any
time
by
Law
make
or
alter
such
Regulations,
except
as
to
the
Places
of
chusing
Senators.”

ISL
has
its
roots
in

Bush
v.
Gore
,
in
which
the
Rehnquist
Court
opined
that
each
state
legislature’s
authority
was
“plenary,”
and
it
could
even
cancel
elections
and
simply
award
electoral
votes
as
it
saw
fit.
A
few
Republican
politicians,
such
as
Maryland’s
Rep.
Andy
Harris,
are
now
openly
advocating
for
state
legislatures
to
do
just
that
this
cycle.
But
most
have
retreated
to

mumbling

like
House
Majority
Leader
Steve
Scalise
that
“There
were
a
few
states
that
did
not
follow
their
state
laws.
That’s
really
the
dispute
that
you’ve
seen
continue
on.”

And
yet
the
RNC
has
zero
problem
running
to
the
courts
to
get
them
to
change
the
rules
set
out
by
the
legislature
when
it’s
their
voters
(maybe!)
getting
the
short
end
of
the
stick.

The
issue
arose
in
Bucks
County,
where
there
were
long
lines
on
the
last
day
to
register
and
vote
absentee.

The
state
does
not
permit
in-person
early
voting,
but
it
does

allow

voters
to
fill
out
an
absentee
ballot
in
person
and
return
it
immediately.
That
process
requires
several
minutes
of
interface
with
election
clerks
for
every
ballot,
though,
and
takes
substantially
longer
than
simply
walking
in
and
voting
on
a
machine.
It
should
be
noted
that
this
logjam
was
virtually
guaranteed
by
Republican
state
legislators,
who
refuse
to
make
it
easier
to
cast
a
ballot
in
the
Commonwealth;
and
by
Republicans,
who
fearmonger
about
drop
boxes
so
aggressively
that
their
own
voters
are
terrified
to
use
them.

By

statute
,
the
last
day
to
request
an
absentee
ballot
is
seven
days
before
the
election,
i.e.
Tuesday
October
29.
According
to
the


Philadelphia
Inquirer
,
election
officials
in
Bucks
County
told
voters
who
were
in
line
by
2:30
on
Tuesday
that
they
could
fill
out
the
forms
and
cast
their
absentee
ballots
that
day.
Everyone
who
was
in
line
by
5
could
request
a
ballot
and
either
receive
it
by
mail
or
pick
it
up
later
in
the
week.
But
that
didn’t
stop
Republicans
from
claiming
that
the
long
lines
were
evidence
of
an
effort
to
suppress
the
votes
of
Trump
supporters.

Here’s
RNC
Chair
Michael
Whatley,
along
with
Val
Biancaniello,
a
PA
GOP
official
in
Delaware
County
who

got
herself
arrested

for
harassing
voters
in
line
to
cast
absentee
ballots
on
Monday.

https://x.com/ChairmanWhatley/status/1851393618365362352

In
2020,
President
Biden
took
63
percent
of
the
vote
in
Delaware
County,
and
52
percent
in
Bucks
County.
Nevertheless,
Whatley

tweeted

that
Biancaniello’s
arrest
“follows
reports
from
across
the
commonwealth
that
voters
are
being
turned
away
in
conservative
areas.”

The
RNC
and
the
Trump
campaign
characterized
attempts
to
manage
the
line
of
voters
as
“voter
suppression,”
and
they
filed

suit

in
the
Bucks
County
Court
of
Common
Pleas
alleging
that
officials
had
violated
the
law
by
not
allowing
everyone
in
line
by
5
to
cast
their
vote
on
site
that
day.
The

statute
,
and
indeed
the
complaint
itself,
are
a
little
unclear
as
to
whether
voters
have
the
right
to
vote
absentee
in
person,
or
simply
to
request
the
ballot
by
the
deadline.
But
the
petitioners
got
their
wish,
with
Judge
Jeffrey
Trauger
granting
a

preliminary
injunction

ordering
election
officials
to
continue
to
process
and
accept
absentee
ballot
requests
through
November
1.

Because
sending
out
absentee
ballots
requests
to
all
voters,
accepting
ballots
in
the
park,
ballot
drop
boxes,
and
court-mandated
voting
modifications
during
a
pandemic
are
illegal.
But
having
a
court
order
two
more
days
of
early
voting
is
totally
kosher.
And
Trump
will
explain
that
fine
distinction
to
Joe
Rogan
when
he
runs
again
in
2028.





Liz
Dye
 lives
in
Baltimore
where
she
produces
the
Law
and
Chaos substack and podcast.

Trump Campaign Cries Voter Suppression, Scores Win For… Ballot Access? – Above the Law

A
week
ago,
Trump

explained

to
podcaster
Joe
Rogan
that
the
2020
election
was
stolen
because
courts
improperly
expanded
access
to
the
ballot.

“They
were
supposed
to
get
legislative
approval
to
do
the
things
they
did,
and
they
didn’t
get
it
in
many
cases,
They
didn’t
get
it,”
the
former
president
rambled.
“Like
for
extensions
of
the
voting,
for
voting
earlier.
All
these.
different
things,
By
law,
they
had
to
get
legislative
approvals.
You
don’t
have
to
go
any
further
than
that.”

Naturally,
Trump
didn’t
invoke
the
words
“independent
state
legislature
theory”

too
many
syllables,
and
he
likely
doesn’t
even
understand
what
it
is.
But
his
point
was
pretty
much
the
definition
of
the
ISL,
which
has
taken
hold
in
the
GOP
since
their
fraud
claims
fizzled
out.
They
insist
that
court
orders
and
actions
taken
by
election
officials
to
expand
access
to
the
ballot
violate
the
Constitution’s
Elections
Clause,
which
provides
that
“The
Times,
Places
and
Manner
of
holding
Elections
for
Senators
and
Representatives,
shall
be
prescribed
in
each
State
by
the
Legislature
thereof;
but
the
Congress
may
at
any
time
by
Law
make
or
alter
such
Regulations,
except
as
to
the
Places
of
chusing
Senators.”

ISL
has
its
roots
in

Bush
v.
Gore
,
in
which
the
Rehnquist
Court
opined
that
each
state
legislature’s
authority
was
“plenary,”
and
it
could
even
cancel
elections
and
simply
award
electoral
votes
as
it
saw
fit.
A
few
Republican
politicians,
such
as
Maryland’s
Rep.
Andy
Harris,
are
now
openly
advocating
for
state
legislatures
to
do
just
that
this
cycle.
But
most
have
retreated
to

mumbling

like
House
Majority
Leader
Steve
Scalise
that
“There
were
a
few
states
that
did
not
follow
their
state
laws.
That’s
really
the
dispute
that
you’ve
seen
continue
on.”

And
yet
the
RNC
has
zero
problem
running
to
the
courts
to
get
them
to
change
the
rules
set
out
by
the
legislature
when
it’s
their
voters
(maybe!)
getting
the
short
end
of
the
stick.

The
issue
arose
in
Bucks
County,
where
there
were
long
lines
on
the
last
day
to
register
and
vote
absentee.

The
state
does
not
permit
in-person
early
voting,
but
it
does

allow

voters
to
fill
out
an
absentee
ballot
in
person
and
return
it
immediately.
That
process
requires
several
minutes
of
interface
with
election
clerks
for
every
ballot,
though,
and
takes
substantially
longer
than
simply
walking
in
and
voting
on
a
machine.
It
should
be
noted
that
this
logjam
was
virtually
guaranteed
by
Republican
state
legislators,
who
refuse
to
make
it
easier
to
cast
a
ballot
in
the
Commonwealth;
and
by
Republicans,
who
fearmonger
about
drop
boxes
so
aggressively
that
their
own
voters
are
terrified
to
use
them.

By

statute
,
the
last
day
to
request
an
absentee
ballot
is
seven
days
before
the
election,
i.e.
Tuesday
October
29.
According
to
the


Philadelphia
Inquirer
,
election
officials
in
Bucks
County
told
voters
who
were
in
line
by
2:30
on
Tuesday
that
they
could
fill
out
the
forms
and
cast
their
absentee
ballots
that
day.
Everyone
who
was
in
line
by
5
could
request
a
ballot
and
either
receive
it
by
mail
or
pick
it
up
later
in
the
week.
But
that
didn’t
stop
Republicans
from
claiming
that
the
long
lines
were
evidence
of
an
effort
to
suppress
the
votes
of
Trump
supporters.

Here’s
RNC
Chair
Michael
Whatley,
along
with
Val
Biancaniello,
a
PA
GOP
official
in
Delaware
County
who

got
herself
arrested

for
harassing
voters
in
line
to
cast
absentee
ballots
on
Monday.

https://x.com/ChairmanWhatley/status/1851393618365362352

In
2020,
President
Biden
took
63
percent
of
the
vote
in
Delaware
County,
and
52
percent
in
Bucks
County.
Nevertheless,
Whatley

tweeted

that
Biancaniello’s
arrest
“follows
reports
from
across
the
commonwealth
that
voters
are
being
turned
away
in
conservative
areas.”

The
RNC
and
the
Trump
campaign
characterized
attempts
to
manage
the
line
of
voters
as
“voter
suppression,”
and
they
filed

suit

in
the
Bucks
County
Court
of
Common
Pleas
alleging
that
officials
had
violated
the
law
by
not
allowing
everyone
in
line
by
5
to
cast
their
vote
on
site
that
day.
The

statute
,
and
indeed
the
complaint
itself,
are
a
little
unclear
as
to
whether
voters
have
the
right
to
vote
absentee
in
person,
or
simply
to
request
the
ballot
by
the
deadline.
But
the
petitioners
got
their
wish,
with
Judge
Jeffrey
Trauger
granting
a

preliminary
injunction

ordering
election
officials
to
continue
to
process
and
accept
absentee
ballot
requests
through
November
1.

Because
sending
out
absentee
ballots
requests
to
all
voters,
accepting
ballots
in
the
park,
ballot
drop
boxes,
and
court-mandated
voting
modifications
during
a
pandemic
are
illegal.
But
having
a
court
order
two
more
days
of
early
voting
is
totally
kosher.
And
Trump
will
explain
that
fine
distinction
to
Joe
Rogan
when
he
runs
again
in
2028.





Liz
Dye
 lives
in
Baltimore
where
she
produces
the
Law
and
Chaos substack and podcast.

Kamala Harris Pledges To Restore Reproductive Freedom In America – Above the Law

(Photo
by
Kent
Nishimura/Getty
Images)



Ed.
note
:
Welcome
to
our
daily
feature,

Quote
of
the
Day
.


I
believe
in
the
fundamental
freedom
of
Americans
to
make
decisions
about
their
own
bodies.
And
not
have
their
government
tell
them
what
to
do.
I
will
fight
to
restore
what
Donald
Trump
and
his
hand-picked
Supreme
Court
Justices
took
away
from
the
women
of
America.


[O]ne
does
not
have
to
abandon
their
faith
or
deeply
held
beliefs
to
agree
that
the
government
and
Donald
Trump
should
not
be
telling
a
woman
what
to
do
with
her
body.
And
when
Congress
passes
a
bill
to
restore
reproductive
freedom
nationwide,
as
President
of
the
United
States,
I
will
proudly
sign
it
into
law.




Democratic
presidential
candidate
Vice
President

Kamala
Harris
,
in
remarks
given
during
her
closing
argument
before
the
American
people
vote
in
the
election
on
November
5.
Harris
pledged
during
her
speech
to
restore
the
rights
that
were
enshrined
in


Roe
v.
Wade

before
the
case
was
overturned
by
the
Supreme
Court
in
2022.



Staci ZaretskyStaci
Zaretsky
 is
a
senior
editor
at
Above
the
Law,
where
she’s
worked
since
2011.
She’d
love
to
hear
from
you,
so
please
feel
free
to

email

her
with
any
tips,
questions,
comments,
or
critiques.
You
can
follow
her
on

X/Twitter

and

Threads

or
connect
with
her
on

LinkedIn
.