NGAGE’s Paul Henry On How Law Firms Can Use Behavioral Analytics to Drive Tech Adoption


You
cannot
have
innovation
without
adoption.
That
was
a
theme
we
heard
repeatedly
when
we
attended
the
Knowledge
Management
&
Innovation
for
Legal
conference
in
New
York
City
in
October.
Our
guest
today,



Paul
Henry
,
would
take
that
a
step
further
and
say
you
do
not
really
have
adoption
without
engagement. 


Henry
is
the
founder
and
CEO
of



NGAGE
Intelligence
,
a
platform
that
provides
law
firms
with
highly
granular
and
comprehensive
behavioral
analytics
to
help
them
understand
whether,
how
and
by
whom
their
communication,
collaboration
and
AI
tools
are
being
used.  


NGAGE
was
founded
on
the
notion
of
employee
engagement
and
how
analytics
can
be
used
to
measure
and
improve
it.
At
the
conference,
LawNext
host
Bob
Ambrogi
sat
down
with
Henry
to
learn
more
about
Ngage
and
how
the
analytics
it
provides
can
drive
adoption,
engagement
and
governance. 


A
note
that
this
was
recorded
live
at
the
conference,
as
the
morning
keynote
speech
was
being
piped
throughout
the
conference
area,
so
I
apologize
for
the
background
noise.. 


Thank
You
To
Our
Sponsors


This
episode
of
LawNext
is
generously
made
possible
by
our
sponsors.
We
appreciate
their
support
and
hope
you
will
check
them
out.


If
you
enjoy
listening
to
LawNext,
please
leave
us
a
review
wherever
you
listen
to
podcasts.

Zocdoc CEO Predicts 3 Ways the Healthcare Industry Will Change in 2025 – MedCity News

This
month,
online
healthcare
booking
platform

Zocdoc

released
an
end-of-the-year

report

detailing
various
trends
in
patient
behavior.
The
report

based
on
data
from
the
millions
of
visitors
Zocdoc
sees
each
month

noted
things
like
an
increased
demand
for
sleep
medicine
specialists,
a
spike
in
mental
health
appointments
during
the
summer,
and
a
low
rate
of
telehealth
visits.

The
report
also
included
some
predictions
from
Zocdoc
CEO
Oliver
Kharraz
about
how
patient
behavior
and
the
healthcare
industry
at
large
might
change
next
year.
Below
are
three
of
his
most
notable
forecasts.


Patients
will
increasingly
opt
for
cash-pay
healthcare

Most
Americans
with
health
coverage
have
been
conditioned
to
seek
care
from
in-network
providers

but
these
patients
often
get
blindsided
by
unexpected
out-of-pocket
costs,
Kharraz
pointed
out.

“Given
the
persistent
increase
in
both
healthcare
costs
and
high-deductible
plans,
it’s
no
surprise
that
we’re
seeing
more
patients
seeking
guaranteed,
upfront,
transparent
pricing,”
he
said.

Kharraz
thinks
this
trend
will
advance
even
further
for
things
like
prescriptions
and
longevity-focused
diagnostics,
such
as
bundled
services
like
labs
and
MRIs.

He
also
noted
that
healthcare
is
becoming
more
and
more
consumer-driven

which
means
niche
cash-pay
services
could
become
more
popular.

“For
example,
we
saw
in
our
booking
data
that
when
patients
chose
to
go
out-of-network
this
year,
it
was
largely
for
mental
health,
cosmetic
treatments
and
dental
care,”
Kharraz
stated.


Amazon
will
restructure
its
healthcare
assets

Over
the
past
few
years,
leaders
in
the
healthcare
industry
have
seen
tech
and
retail
giants
like
Walmart,
Apple
and
Google
struggle
to
break
into
their
uniquely
complex
sector.
Amazon
is
no
different

and
Kharraz
believes
there
is
a
good
chance
the
company
will
significantly
rearrange
its
healthcare
offerings
in
2025.

As
a
tech
behemoth,
it’s
rational
to
try
and
use
your
core
competency
to
capitalize
on
the
nearly
$5
trillion
healthcare
spend
in
the
U.S.,
he
noted.
For
instance,
Amazon
has
tried
to
leverage
its
retail
strengths,
Apple
has
tried
to
break
through
with
its
hardware
capabilities,
and
Google
has
entered
the
sector
with
a
data-first
strategy,
Kharraz
explained.

“When
you
have
a
hammer,
everything
looks
like
a
nail.
But
healthcare
is
hard
to
disrupt
from
the
inside-out,
and
this
approach
has
been
unsuccessful,”
he
said.

Amazon’s
healthcare
efforts
haven’t
been
very
profitable,
and
it
is
“untenable”
for
the
company
to
keep
incurring
hundreds
of
millions
in
losses,
Kharraz
stated.

“I
suspect
2025
will
be
the
year
that
Amazon
determines
that
they
don’t
have
the
recipe
to
make
in-person
healthcare
work,
and
managing
healthcare
providers
is
a
very
different
business
than
managing
logistics,”
he
remarked.

He
thinks
Amazon
will
likely
refocus
on
its
pharmacy
benefits,
which
are
easier
to
scale
than
care
delivery
offerings.


GLP-1
adoption
will
increase

More
Americans
will
start
using
GLP-1
medications
in
2025,
the
report
predicted.
GLP-1
supply
issues
are
decreasing,
so
prices
are
coming
down

meaning
many
Americans
will
gain
access
to
medications
that
they
couldn’t
afford
in
the
past.

This
will
result
in
several
downstream
effects,
Kharraz
said.
For
example,
he
thinks
payers
will
likely
start
to
treat
these
drugs
differently.

“There
will
likely
be
an
evolution
in
their
coverage,
and
we’re
already
starting
to
see
payers,
including
​Medicare
and
Medicaid,
receive
pressure
to
expand
access
to
weight
loss
drugs,”
Kharraz
pointed
out.

He
also
noted
that
compounders
may
be
phased
out.
Compounders
helped
fill
supply
gaps
when
GLP-1
production
was
slow

but
now
that
these
drugs
are
more
available,
patients
will
choose
less
expensive,
FDA-approved
options
instead
of
compounded
drugs,
Kharraz
explained.

The
increased
adoption
of
GLP-1s
will
also
cause
some
indirect
effects,
he
added.

“There
may
be
reduced
demand
for
traditional
weight
loss
medications,
bariatric
surgeries
and
possibly
insulin
therapy
in
some
patients.
GLP-1s
may
reduce
obesity-related
comorbidities
like
type
2
diabetes,
cardiovascular
disease
and
certain
cancers.
We
are
still
in
the
early
innings
of
seeing
their
impact
on
Americans’
health
and
care
delivery
system,”
Kharraz
said.


Photo:
Getty
Images, AndreyPopov

2024 In Legal Ops: AI, Adaptation, And What’s Next – Above the Law


The
Legal
Operations
landscape
is
evolving
faster
than
ever,
and
UpLevel
Ops
is
at
the
forefront
of
this
transformation.
With
advancements
like
generative
AI
subscriptions,
custom
GPT
services,
and
value-based
pricing
shaking
up
traditional
approaches,
legal
departments
are
navigating
uncharted
territory.


In
this
Q&A,
UpLevel
Ops’
Advisory
Team
members

Stephanie
Corey,
CEO
and
ULO
Co-Founder;
Brian
Hupp,
Senior
Strategist
and
workflow
guru;
Sumi
Trombley,
Senior
Advisor
and
contract
innovation
leader;
and
Brandi
Pack,
AI
Specialist

reflect
on
the
wild
ride
that
was
2024
and
share
bold
predictions
for
the
challenges
and
opportunities
awaiting
in
2025.


From
revolutionary
uses
of
AI
to
new
strategies
in
outside
counsel
management,
their
insights
provide
a
roadmap
for
legal
teams
ready
to
embrace
the
next
wave
of
innovation. 


Q:
What
stood
out
most
in
Legal
Operations
this
year?



Stephanie
Corey
:
2024
was
a
transformative
year.
Generative
AI
(GAI)
moved
from
a
buzzword
to
a
tangible
tool.
Departments
that
once
hesitated
embraced
tools
like
automated
FAQs
and
chatbots
to
manage
workflows.
Legal
teams
often
took
the
lead
in
piloting
and
deploying
these
technologies,
a
remarkable
shift
for
a
traditionally
risk-averse
industry.



Brian
Hupp
:
Practical
use
cases
stood
out.
Legal
teams
tackled
low-hanging
fruit

chatbots
to
answer
FAQs,
tools
to
summarize
policies,
and
document
automation.
It
wasn’t
about
experimenting
for
the
sake
of
it;
it
was
about
solving
real
problems
in
real
time.



Sumi
Trombley
:
Many
teams
focused
on
readiness.
Instead
of
rushing
to
buy
tools,
they
cleaned
data,
assessed
processes,
and
defined
objectives.
This
groundwork
sets
them
up
for
smarter
choices
in
2025.


Q:
How
has
AI
specifically
changed
the
legal
tech
landscape?



Brian
:
AI
has
addressed
one
of
Legal
Operations’
most
nagging
problems:
knowledge
management.
For
decades,
teams
documented
policies
only
to
find
that
no
one
read
them.
This
year,
AI
bridged
that
gap,
making
information
accessible
and
actionable.



Brandi
Pack
:
AI
has
accelerated
decision-making.
Tools
like
OpenAI’s
advanced
models
parse
contracts,
generate
insights,
and
even
recommend
edits.
That
said,
teams
need
to
avoid
“model
chasing.”
Stick
with
a
trusted
AI
platform
for
consistency,
though
combining
models
for
specific
use
cases
can
amplify
results.



Sumi
:
AI’s
biggest
strength
is
evolution.
Tools
learn
and
improve
continuously.
For
example,
AI-powered
CLM
solutions
are
becoming
more
intuitive,
setting
the
stage
for
significant
advancements
in
contracting
next
year.


Q:
What
surprised
you
most
this
year?



Sumi
:
The
shift
toward
readiness
work
was
a
pleasant
surprise.
Companies
prioritized
foundational
efforts
like
evaluating
workloads
and
refining
processes
before
investing
in
tech.
It
was
a
wise
use
of
resources,
especially
as
the
industry
worked
to
make
sense
of
a
rapidly
changing
technology
landscape.
This
reflective
approach
not
only
saved
money
in
the
short
term
but
also
positioned
teams
to
make
more
strategic
and
impactful
decisions
in
2025.



Brandi
:
The
sudden
burst
of
AI
enthusiasm
in
the
second
half
of
the
year
was
surprising.
Initial
hesitancy
around
security
and
confidentiality
gave
way
to
eagerness
as
teams
saw
tangible
results.
IT
departments
are
now
being
pushed
to
allow
experimentation
and
use
of
basic
AI
productivity-enhancing
tools.
We
will
likely
see
this
trend
continue
and
expand.



Brian
:
Watching
clients
progress
from
skeptics
to
advocates
was
a
highlight.
Small
wins

like
using
AI
for
FAQs
or
document
reviews

showed
immediate
value.
One
client
told
me
they
couldn’t
imagine
returning
to
manual
processes.


Q:
What
actionable
steps
should
Legal
Ops
teams
prioritize
for
2025?



Stephanie
:
Experimentation
is
key.
Start
small

address
a
pain
point
like
email
drafting
or
automated
FAQs

and
build
confidence
through
quick
wins.



Brian
:
Shift
the
conversation
with
outside
counsel
from
hourly
billing
to
value-based
pricing.
AI
is
driving
efficiencies,
but
clients
must
push
firms
to
pass
on
those
savings.



Sumi
:
Use
AI
to
reclaim
time.
Think
of
the
80/20
rule:
Let
AI
handle
routine
tasks,
freeing
up
resources
for
strategic
projects.
It’s
not
about
replacing
humans
but
enabling
them
to
focus
on
higher-value
work.


Q:
What
challenges
do
you
foresee
for
2025?



Brandi
:
Fear
of
customization
will
be
a
hurdle.
Many
IT
teams
are
hesitant
to
let
employees
create
their
own
bespoke
AI
assistants.
Balancing
control
with
trust
is
critical
to
unlocking
AI’s
full
potential.
Organizations
with
a
lockdown
on
experimentation
will
suffer
competitively
as
their
workforce
will
be
less
skilled
than
those
who
allow
it



Sumi
:
Privacy
and
security
concerns
will
demand
attention.
Legal
ops
professionals
must
upskill
in
these
areas
as
AI
becomes
more
central
to
their
operations.



Brian
:
Demonstrating
ROI
will
be
essential.
Leaders
need
to
showcase
the
value
of
AI
through
reduced
turnaround
times
and
cost
savings
to
secure
further
investment.


Q:
What
are
your
big
predictions
for
2025?



Sumi
:
2025
will
be
the
year
of
execution.
The
readiness
work
done
this
year
will
culminate
in
major
rollouts,
with
contracting
and
workflow
automation
thriving
under
AI’s
support.



Brian
:
Workflow
automation
will
surge,
with
AI-enabled
platforms
creating
workflows
automatically.
This
will
significantly
reduce
implementation
times
and
improve
visibility
across
departments.



Brandi
:
Independent
agents,
meaning
AI
tools
that
not
only
chat
with
you,
but
autonomously
take
actions
on
your
behalf,
will
redefine
how
work
gets
done.
These
agents,
alongside
continued
tech
consolidation,
will
reshape
the
vendor
landscape
and
how
teams
operate.


Q:
What
are
your
final
thoughts
for
Legal
Ops
professionals
as
we
close
the
year?



Stephanie
:
2025
will
be
a
time
of
significant
transformation.
It’s
a
prime
opportunity
for
Legal
Operations
to
truly
embrace
their
strategic
role,
lead
with
confidence,
and
take
ownership
of
tech
pilots,
budget
strategies,
and
change
initiatives.
Legal
operations
can
no
longer
afford
to
remain
behind
the
scenes.



Brian
:
Expand
your
influence
by
building
bridges
with
IT,
Finance,
and
HR.
Collaboration
ensures
legal’s
goals
align
with
the
company’s
broader
strategies.
Start
small
but
aim
for
long-term
impact.



Sumi
:
AI
is
a
game-changer,
but
it’s
one
piece
of
the
puzzle.
Focus
on
how
tech,
processes,
and
relationships
intersect.
Outside
counsel
management,
for
example,
isn’t
just
about
cost

it’s
about
creating
more
predictable
and
accountable
partnerships.



Brandi
:
Embrace
experimentation
and
iteration.
AI
won’t
be
perfect,
and
that’s
okay.
Use
it
as
a
learning
tool.
Advocate
for
training
to
ensure
your
team
is
confident
in
navigating
this
evolving
landscape.



Stephanie
:
Don’t
underestimate
the
power
of
storytelling.
Whether
advocating
for
resources
or
showcasing
impact,
connect
the
dots
for
your
audience.
Legal
Operations
isn’t
just
adapting
to
change

it’s
driving
it.

Morning Docket: 12.17.24 – Above the Law

(Photo
by
Yuki
Iwamura-Pool/Getty
Images)

*
Judge
denies
Trump
attempt
to
toss
hush
money
convictions
on
grounds
of
“sure
he
wasn’t
in
office
but
paying
off
porn
stars
is
a
*kind*
of
official
presidential”
immunity.
But
the
court
reserved
the
right
to
toss
the
case
later
based
on
feels.
[CNN]

*
TikTok
swipes
over
to
the
Supreme
Court
to
stop
looming
ban.
[National
Law
Journal
]

*
Adeel
Mangi
gives
up
on
Third
Circuit
nomination
noting
that
confirmation
had
become
“a
channel
for
the
raising
of
money
based
on
performative
McCarthyism
before
video
cameras.”
But
that’s
a
half-truth!
It
can
also
been
a
rubberstamping
commission
mill
for
unqualified
Federalist
Society
flunkies
and
we’ll
see
that
side
soon
enough.
[New
Jersey
Law
Journal
]

*
Despite
court
ruling,
law
school
class
diversity
remained
more
or
less
steady
this
year.
[Bloomberg
Law
News
]

*
Supreme
Court
finally
finds
a
political
corruption
case
they
will
allow
to
proceed.
[Reuters]

*
Supreme
Court
also
moves
toward
online
lottery
for
public
seats.
[ABA
Journal
]

*
Where
will
Tom
Girardi
serve
out
his
sentence?
[Law360]

The 2024 Outside Counsel Rankings: Top Law Firms By Industry – Above the Law


Last
week,
we
released
our



Outside
Counsel
rankings
,
an
annual
look
at
the
Biglaw
firms
most
trusted
by
corporate
legal
departments.
Today,
we
highlight
the
firms
rated
highest
by
in-house
counsel
based
on
the
industries
in
which
they
work. 


Drawing
on
survey
responses
from
hundreds
of
GCs
and
in-house
lawyers,
we’ve
compiled
rankings
for
four
industries:
Finance/Banking,
Healthcare/Life
Sciences,
Media
&
Entertainment,
and
Technology. 


While
several
law
firms
made
the
list
in
more
than
one
industry,
just
one
law
firm

Latham
&
Watkins

appears
on
all
four
industry
lists.
Latham
also
placed
in
the



Top
Tier


of
our
overall
ranking
across
all
sectors.


Seven
law
firms
are
top
ranked
in
two
industries:


  • Akin
    Gump
    Strauss
    Hauer
    &
    Feld
    (Finance,
    Technology)

  • Baker
    &
    McKenzie
    (Healthcare,
    Technology)

  • Cooley*
    (Finance,
    Healthcare)

  • Covington
    &
    Burling*
    (Finance,
    Technology)

  • Gibson,
    Dunn
    &
    Crutcher*
    (Finance,
    Media
    &
    Entertainment)

  • Kirkland
    &
    Ellis*
    (Finance,
    Technology)

  • Ropes
    &
    Gray*
    (Finance,
    Healthcare)


*Also
placed
in
Top
Tier
of
overall
ranking


Congratulations
to
all
the
recognized
firms!
To
see
who
else
made
the
cut,
check
out
the
full
set
of



industry
rankings
.


button_check-out-the-industry-rankings_2024

Prestigious Litigation Boutique Offers Eye-Popping Bonuses That Blow Away The Market Scale – Above the Law

Biglaw
may
seem
like
the
place
to
be
when
it
comes
to
high
salaries
and
even
higher
bonuses,
what
with
Milbank’s
generous

year-end

and

special

bonus
scales,
but
once
again,
it’s
time
for
us
to
consider
elite
boutique
law
firms.
We’ve
got
another
bonus
from
a
boutique
that
absolutely
blows
away
the
current
market
standard.

Susman
Godfrey
has
entered
the
scene
to
wow
its
associates

and
the
market
at
large,
to
be
frank

with
its
astounding
bonus
scale.
We’re
told
that
these
numbers
exceed
the
prevailing
market
scale,
including
base
and
special
bonuses.
This
year,
the
firm
is
sharing
bonuses
with
associates
that
reach
a
median
of
$260,000
by
graduation
year.

For
purposes
of
comparing
Susman
Godfrey
associate
bonuses
to
those
of
law
firms
that
award
bonuses
based
on
class
year,
here
are
the
firm’s
median
bonuses
by
graduation
year:

Susman Bonus 2024 by Grad Year
Again,
these
are
the
median
bonuses,
but
given
that
the
most
junior
associates
($110,000)
are
earning
slightly
less
than
the
most
senior
associates
on
the
Milbank
scale
($115,000),
you
know
it’s
been
a
good
year
at
Susman
Godfrey.
For
the
sake
of
comparison,
the
standard
market
bonus
for
the
Class
of
2020
is
$75,000,
with
an
additional
special
bonus
of
$20,000
($95,000
total),
meaning
Susman
is
giving
associates
at
least
$60,000
more.
That’s
a
pretty
great
payday.

The
firm’s
managing
partners,
Vineet
Bhatia
and
Kalpana
Srinivasan,
had
this
to
say
about
the
good
news:

“Susman
Godfrey
enjoyed
another
extremely
successful
year.
We
also
hit
a
pivotal
moment
in
exceeding
for
the
first
time
100
partners.
Our
strong
partnership
and
deep
bench
of
talent
continue
to
position
us
to
handle
the
most
complex
cases
against
the
most
formidable
adversaries
across
the
nation.”

The
prestigious
firm
also
announced
its
new
partnership
class,
adding
seven
associates
eligible
for
election
to
its
full
equity
ranks.
You
can
read
the
firm’s
announcement
on
the
next
page.

Congratulations
to
both
the
firm
and
its
associates
on
a
fantastic
year!

(Flip
to
the
next
page
to
read
the
firm’s
bonus
press
release
in
full.)

Remember
everyone,
we
depend
on
your
tips
to
stay
on
top
of
compensation
updates,
so
when
your
firm
announces
or
matches,
please
text
us
(646-820-8477)
or email
us
 (subject
line:
“[Firm
Name]
Bonus/Matches”).
Please
include
the
memo
if
available.
You
can
take
a
photo
of
the
memo
and
send
it
via
text
or
email
if
you
don’t
want
to
forward
the
original
PDF
or
Word
file.

And
if
you’d
like
to
sign
up
for
ATL’s
Bonus
Alerts
(which
is
the
alert
list
we
also
use
for
salary
announcements),
please
scroll
down
and
enter
your
email
address
in
the
box
below
this
post.
If
you
previously
signed
up
for
the
bonus
alerts,
you
don’t
need
to
do
anything.
You’ll
receive
an
email
notification
within
minutes
of
each
bonus
announcement
that
we
publish.
Thanks
for
your
help!



Staci ZaretskyStaci
Zaretsky
 is
a
senior
editor
at
Above
the
Law,
where
she’s
worked
since
2011.
She’d
love
to
hear
from
you,
so
please
feel
free
to

email

her
with
any
tips,
questions,
comments,
or
critiques.
You
can
follow
her
on BlueskyX/Twitter,
and Threads, or
connect
with
her
on LinkedIn.


Bonus Time

Enter
your
email
address
to
sign
up
for
ATL’s

Bonus
&
Salary
Increase
Alerts
.


Morning Docket: 12.17.24 – Above the Law

(Photo
by
Yuki
Iwamura-Pool/Getty
Images)

*
Judge
denies
Trump
attempt
to
toss
hush
money
convictions
on
grounds
of
“sure
he
wasn’t
in
office
but
paying
off
porn
stars
is
a
*kind*
of
official
presidential”
immunity.
But
the
court
reserved
the
right
to
toss
the
case
later
based
on
feels.
[CNN]

*
TikTok
swipes
over
to
the
Supreme
Court
to
stop
looming
ban.
[National
Law
Journal
]

*
Adeel
Mangi
gives
up
on
Third
Circuit
nomination
noting
that
confirmation
had
become
“a
channel
for
the
raising
of
money
based
on
performative
McCarthyism
before
video
cameras.”
But
that’s
a
half-truth!
It
can
also
been
a
rubberstamping
commission
mill
for
unqualified
Federalist
Society
flunkies
and
we’ll
see
that
side
soon
enough.
[New
Jersey
Law
Journal
]

*
Despite
court
ruling,
law
school
class
diversity
remained
more
or
less
steady
this
year.
[Bloomberg
Law
News
]

*
Supreme
Court
finally
finds
a
political
corruption
case
they
will
allow
to
proceed.
[Reuters]

*
Supreme
Court
also
moves
toward
online
lottery
for
public
seats.
[ABA
Journal
]

*
Where
will
Tom
Girardi
serve
out
his
sentence?
[Law360]

Plummeting Faith In American Courts Among 10 Largest Declines Worldwide – Above the Law

(Photo
via
Image
Generator)

It
appears
that
Americans
have
lost
a
lot
of
faith
in
American
courts.
A
LOT
of
faith.

Who
would’ve
thought

tossing
a
half
century
of
abortion
precedent

and
rewriting
the
Constitution

based
on
vibes

(and
then

publicly
regretting
it
),
while
trying
to
hide
the

luxury
trips

and

expensive
gifts

they’re
taking
could
shake
the
nation’s
faith
in
blind
justice.
And
that’s
just
the
Supreme
Court…
we
haven’t
even
gotten
to
the
lower
courts
where

unqualified
judges
play
Mad
Libs
with
statutes

and

single
judge
courthouses
overrule
the
FDA’s
medical
judgments
from
Amarillo
.

They
said

“boneless”
wings
can
have
bones
,
for
God’s
sake.

And

new
findings
from
Gallup

reveal
that
all
this
has
triggered
a
loss
of
faith
of
global
proportions.

Screenshot 2024-12-17 at 8.44.56 AM

Gotta
love
whenever
the
United
States
gets
mentioned
alongside
Myanmar!
Coincidently,
a
nation
where
the
courts
also
believe
in
immunity
for

assassinating
political
rivals
.
That
seems
at
least
somewhat
relevant.

Hong
Kong’s
courts
are
in
the
midst
of
a
hostile
takeover

prompting
Biglaw
firms
to
abandon
China
outright

and
Syria
has…
gone
through
some
stuff
lately.
Yet
the
declines
in
those
countries
leading
up
to
recent
events
rank
only
slightly
ahead
of
America’s
loss
of
faith
in
its
courts.

Rarified
air.
Kudos
all
around.

This
crisis
of
confidence
is
entirely
the
fault
of
the
courts.
Or
more
specifically,
the
superstructure
of
judges,
academics,
and
friendly
media
who
have
either
engaged
in
or
normalized
the
sorts
of
actions
described
above.
The
latter
point
shouldn’t
be
overlooked.
There
are
voices
within
and
without
the
judiciary
who
sit
silently
as
this
happens
out
of
some
phony
sense
of
“civility”
or
“deference.”
It’s
a
misplaced
impulse
because
saving
the
credibility
of
the
judiciary
isn’t
served
by
pretending
it’s
normal
and
appropriate
for
judges
to
be
taking
luxury
vacations,
and
shame
on
you
for
questioning
them!

But
since
taking
responsibility
isn’t
any
of
these
people’s
style,
they
want
to
pin
the
blame
on
everyone
else
and
they’re
working
harder
at
that

than
they
are
at
basic
legal
research
.

There’s
an
aggressive
gaslighting
campaign
to
make
this
all
the
fault
of
anyone
who
points
out
bonkers
rulings
and
clumsy
corruption.
In
editorials
and
social
media
posts,
defenders
of
the
rot
have
sought
to
poison
the
well
by
casting
any
criticism
of
judging
as
undermining
the
rule
of
law
writ
large.
Or
worse…
like
when
Fifth
Circuit
Judge
Edith
Jones
threw
a
recent

comically
unhinged
temper
tantrum

claiming
judge
shopping
criticism
causes
death
threats.

Personal
attacks

like
the
ones
Judge
Jones
never
could
identify
in
her
rant

aren’t
productive.
But
critiquing
the
reasoning
in
written
opinions
(assuming
they
bother
writing
an
opinion
)
or
shining
a
light
on
jurists
taking
private
jet
trips
with
parties
before
the
court
or
taking
cases
they
know
to
be

manufactured
to
exploit
political
or
financial
bias

or
noting
that
the
ABA
rates
a
judge
as
unqualified
aren’t
personal
attacks,
those
are
matters
of
valid
public
concern.

Whenever
someone
suggests
that
criticizing
a
decision
amounts
to
an
assault
on
the
rule
of
law
itself,
it
betrays
the
foundational
corruption
in
the
system
right
now.
Judges
seeing
themselves
as
personally
coextensive
with
the
law
is
some
serious
Louis
XIV
shit.
Ideally,
judges
seek
to
interpret
the
law
and
while
their
opinions
carry
the
force
of
law,
they
could
well
be
proven
wrong.
Yet
it’s
a
core
belief
of
many
judges

especially
those
who’ve
draped
their
personal
political
beliefs
in
the
veneer
of
hypothetical
“originalism”

that
they
do
not
interpret
law
but
divine
its
immutable
meaning.
By
this
reasoning,
they
cannot
be
“wrong”
because
they
have
infallibly
decreed
the
law
and
to
point
out
lapses
in
logic
or
shoddy
research
is
not
just
an
attack
on
their
work,
but
on
law
itself.

That’s
dangerously
authoritarian
and
opens
the
door
to
corruption.
If
they’re
just
objectively
stating
the
law…
then
who
cares
if
they’re
taking
money
from
one
of
the
litigants?
Or
passing
judgment
on
the
whole
country
for
a
Potemkin
plaintiff
in
their
one-judge
courthouse?
Or
going
on

luxury
junkets
to
be
taught
what
opinions
to
write
?

It’s
an
actual
crisis
when
public
confidence
suffers
a
hit
like
this.
Judges
should
be
figuring
out
how
to
fix
it
instead
of
railing
against
everyone
pointing
out
that
their
judicial
emperors
wear
no
clothes.

Instead,
the
Chief
Justice
will
probably
write

another
report
about
the
history
of
typewriters
.




HeadshotJoe
Patrice
 is
a
senior
editor
at
Above
the
Law
and
co-host
of

Thinking
Like
A
Lawyer
.
Feel
free
to email
any
tips,
questions,
or
comments.
Follow
him
on Twitter or

Bluesky

if
you’re
interested
in
law,
politics,
and
a
healthy
dose
of
college
sports
news.
Joe
also
serves
as
a

Managing
Director
at
RPN
Executive
Search
.

Valuable Source Of Business Or Dreaded Obligation? Share Your Take On Trade Shows – Above the Law

What’s
your
take
on
legal
trade
shows?
Are
they
an
important
way
to
learn
about
the
latest
trends? 


A
valued
opportunity
to
meet
potential
clients? 


Or
an
exhausting
blur
of
tech
talk
and
marketing
speak
that
leaves
you
with
little
but
an
expense
report
and
a
headache?


Whether
you
regularly
attend
trade
shows
or
avoid
them
like
the
plague,
we
want
to
know
what
you
think.
Please
take
our



brief,
anonymous
survey


to
share
your
views. 


button_take-the-survey

Morning Docket: 12.17.24 – Above the Law

(Photo
by
Yuki
Iwamura-Pool/Getty
Images)

*
Judge
denies
Trump
attempt
to
toss
hush
money
convictions
on
grounds
of
“sure
he
wasn’t
in
office
but
paying
off
porn
stars
is
a
*kind*
of
official
presidential”
immunity.
But
the
court
reserved
the
right
to
toss
the
case
later
based
on
feels.
[CNN]

*
TikTok
swipes
over
to
the
Supreme
Court
to
stop
looming
ban.
[National
Law
Journal
]

*
Adeel
Mangi
gives
up
on
Third
Circuit
nomination
noting
that
confirmation
had
become
“a
channel
for
the
raising
of
money
based
on
performative
McCarthyism
before
video
cameras.”
But
that’s
a
half-truth!
It
can
also
been
a
rubberstamping
commission
mill
for
unqualified
Federalist
Society
flunkies
and
we’ll
see
that
side
soon
enough.
[New
Jersey
Law
Journal
]

*
Despite
court
ruling,
law
school
class
diversity
remained
more
or
less
steady
this
year.
[Bloomberg
Law
News
]

*
Supreme
Court
finally
finds
a
political
corruption
case
they
will
allow
to
proceed.
[Reuters]

*
Supreme
Court
also
moves
toward
online
lottery
for
public
seats.
[ABA
Journal
]

*
Where
will
Tom
Girardi
serve
out
his
sentence?
[Law360]