Sullivan & Cromwell Attorneys Are NOT Happy The Firm Decided To Suck Up To Trump – Above the Law

Back
in
the
day,
S&C
reportedly
refused
to
represent
Trump,
allowing
them
to
avoid
having
to
trade
deep-pocketed
clients
anxious
to
distance
their
brands
from
the
most
toxic
client
in
America,
in
exchange
for
the
honor
of

getting
stiffed
on
the
bill
.
But
this
time
around,
corporate
America
appears
actively
interested
in
currying
favor
with
the
White
House
any
way
they
can
and
a
cozy
relationship
with
Trump
is
not
only
no
longer
a
negative,
it
might
actually
be
a
firm
selling
point.
And
so
Sullivan
&
Cromwell
publicly
announced
that
it’s
going
to

represent
Trump

as
he
challenges
the
hush
money
conviction.

For
their
sake,
I
hope
they’ve
already
written
off
any
potential
fees.

Firm
leadership
might
see
this
matter
as
an
opportunity
to
show
clients
that
they
have
Trump’s
ear,
which
remains
surprisingly
pristine
one
for
a
guy
who
swears
it
was
shot
off
by
a
sniper.
But
the
decision
is
already
alienating
the
firm’s
attorneys.

According
to
one
S&C
attorney
who
purports
to
have
spoken
with
multiple S&C colleagues,
the
mood
is
that
everyone
is
“upset
with
the
announcement
that
we’ll
be
representing
Trump.”
Another
notes
that
it
will
“likely
to
grow
into
a
morale
drain
among
associates.”
An
attorney
on

Reddit

put
it
bluntly,
“Is
it
dramatic
to
want
to
leave?
I’m
a
POC
and
I
know
everyone
has
a
right
to
a
fair
trial
but
(in
my
eyes)
he
is
a
sexual
predator/fascist/criminal/threat
to
democracy
and
I
feel
a
little
too
uncomfortable
considering
just
how
much
damage
this
man
has
done.” 

And
while
there
may
be
general
dismay
with
representing
Trump
as
a
person,
for
one
S&C
lawyer
it’s
less
about
the
client
than
that
client’s
history
of
forcing
his
lawyers
to

publicly
debase
themselves

by
litigating
cases

his

way.

It
does
not
appear
that
we
are
treating
this
like
a
normal S&C appeal
where
we
stay
quiet
and
do
great
legal
work.
To
have
the
head
of
the
Firm
talking
about
D.A.
Bragg
“target[ing]”
President
Trump
is
completely
antithetical
to
anything
I
have
experienced
in
my
time
at
the
Firm
before. 
I
had
always
been
proud
that
we
emphasize
precision
and
accuracy
in
what
we
say—eschewing
exaggerations,
hyperbole
and
personal
attacks. Very
alienating
to
see
senior
management
abandoning
that.

It
seems
S&C
has
entered
its
Roy
Cohn
era.

S&C
pays
market
and
provides
matching
bonuses
so
they’ll
not
find
themselves
bereft
of
talent
right
away.
But
when
the
next
up-and-coming
talent
weighs
their
summer
offers
or
a
thriving
associate
gets
a
call
from
a
recruiter…
are
they
going
to
be
interested
in
a
career
with
Roy
Cohn
Lite,
LLP
or
somewhere
else?


Earlier
:

Sullivan
&
Cromwell
Joins
Trump
Defense
As
Age
Of


Obsequiousness


Begins!




HeadshotJoe
Patrice
 is
a
senior
editor
at
Above
the
Law
and
co-host
of

Thinking
Like
A
Lawyer
.
Feel
free
to email
any
tips,
questions,
or
comments.
Follow
him
on Twitter or

Bluesky

if
you’re
interested
in
law,
politics,
and
a
healthy
dose
of
college
sports
news.
Joe
also
serves
as
a

Managing
Director
at
RPN
Executive
Search
.

5 AI-Powered Hacks to Maximize Law Firm Productivity – Above the Law

Artificial
intelligence
is
rapidly
altering
the
way
law
firms
operate

for
the
better.
Whether
your
firm
is
looking
to
automate
routine
tasks
or
streamline
traditionally
time-intensive
operations,
AI
empowers
legal
professionals
to
reclaim
time
and
focus
on
delivering
outstanding
outcomes
for
clients. 

Ready
to
learn
how
legal
AI
tools
can
realistically
help
your
firm?
Discover
how
five
AI-powered
hacks
can
boost
your
firm’s
productivity
and
efficiency
so
you
stay
competitive,
free
up
time,
and
focus
on
the
things
that
matter.

Download
this
new
eBook
and
learn
how
MyCase
IQ
can
help
you
navigate
these
challenges:

  • Sifting
    Through
    Lengthy
    Documents
  • Proofreading
    &
    Editing
    Copy
  • Translating
    Text
    Into
    Different
    Languages
  • Drafting
    Discovery
    Requests
    &
    Responses
  • The
    Legal
    Discovery
    Process

Biglaw Firm Gets Hit With Lawsuit Over Partner’s Romance – Above the Law

When
Texas
bankruptcy
judge David
R.
Jones

hid
his
romantic
relationship
with
a
Biglaw
partner
and
continued
to
hear
cases
involving
that
partner/law
firm,
it
led
to
a
legal
ethics
conundrum
that
is
still
ongoing.

Jones,
the
(now
former
)
federal
bankruptcy
judge,
was
involved
with Elizabeth
Freeman
,
the
(now
former)
bankruptcy
partner
at
Jackson
Walker,
and
somehow
didn’t
recuse
himself
from
cases
involving
Freeman.
As
a
result,
Jones

resigned

from
the
bench.
Plus,
the
Department
of
Justice

is
suing

Freeman’s
former
firm
to
try
to
disgorge
up
to
$23
million
in
fees
it
collected
in
cases
overseen
by
Jones.
And
this
week,
Jackson
Walker
is
facing
another
lawsuit
because
of
this
mess.

As

reported
by

Bloomberg
Law,
former
client
JCPenney
filed
a

lawsuit

earlier
this
week
seeking
the
disgorgement
of
$1.1
million
in
fees.
The
retailer
alleges
the
firm
failed
to inform
JCPenney
“at
any
time”
about
the
relationship
before
it
became
public
in
October
2023,
despite
the
firm
and/or
some
of
its
attorneys
knowing
about
the
relationship
sooner.
The
complaint
alleges
the
firm
“consciously
and
deliberately
made
the
economic
decision
to
breach
its
duties”
to
its
client.

The
complaint
further
alleges
Jackson
Walker
took
“half-hearted”
and
“inadequate
actions
in
an
attempt
to
address
the
issue.”
Making
none
too
fine
a
point
on
the
rationale
for
disgorging
the
fees
the
firm
collected,
“Simply
put,
the
revenue
from
appearing
in
front
of
Jones
outweighed
[Jackson
Walker’s]
view
of
its
professional
obligations.”

Jackson
Walker
has
not
commented
on
the
complaint.


Earlier:
 Former
Judge
Gets
Combative
When
Pressed
On
His
Romantic
Relationship


Who
Knew
What
When?
The
Latest
In
The
Judge/Partner
Romantic
Scandal
Rocking
The
Legal
World


You
Have
To
Read
The
Texts
Uncovered
In
The
Judge/
Biglaw
Partner
Romantic
Scandal


Federal
Judge
Slams
Biglaw
Firm,
Says
Firm
‘Defiled
The
Very
Temple
Of
Justice’


Biglaw
Firm
Still
Paying
The
Price
For
Former
Partner’s
Romantic
Scandal


Scandal-Ridden
Former
Federal
Judge
Seeks
To
Squash
Lawsuit
That
Started
It
All


The
Wild
Ethical
Lapse
That
Led
To
The
Resignation
Of
A
Top
Bankruptcy
Judge




Kathryn Rubino Headshot
Kathryn
Rubino
is
a
Senior
Editor
at
Above
the
Law,
host
of

The
Jabot
podcast
,
and
co-host
of

Thinking
Like
A
Lawyer
.
AtL
tipsters
are
the
best,
so
please
connect
with
her.
Feel
free
to
email

her

with
any
tips,
questions,
or
comments
and
follow
her
on
Twitter

@Kathryn1
 or
Mastodon

@[email protected].

No. 2 Biglaw Firm In America Announces Market-Beating Bonuses – Above the Law

It’s
almost
February,
but
Biglaw
firms
are
continuing
to
spread
the
wealth
to
associates
across
the
country
after
a
successful
financial
year
by
announcing
matches
of
Milbank’s
generous

year-end
 and special
bonuses.

Good
things
come
with
patience,
and
if
you’re
an
associate
at
Latham
who
was
waiting
for
a
bonus,
your
patience
has
been
rewarded
with
really,

really

good
things.

Latham
&
Watkins

a
firm
that
brought
in
$5,688,226,000
gross
revenue
in
2023,
putting
it
at
No.
2
on
the
Am
Law
100

is
known
for
announcing
its
year-end
bonuses
in
January,
and
they
usually
beat
the
going
market
rate.
Earlier
this
week,
the
firm
finally
announced
its
bonuses,
and
even
though
associates
had
to
wait
for
the
cash,
they’re
probably
pretty
happy
about
what’s
getting
deposited
into
their
bank
accounts.

Bonuses
at
Latham
come
with
a
billable
requirement
of
1900
hours,
but
they
also
give
extra
money
for
those
who
are
billing
above
that
threshold.
And,
from
the
looks
of
it,
Latham
associates
have
been
busy

extremely
busy.
The
base
bonuses
are
at
market
levels,
but
the
median
bonuses
for
every
class
year
beat
the
market
rate
by
thousands
of
dollars.
And
the
top
bonuses
are
way,

way
 over
what
the
market
gives
out.

The
firm
circulated
the
below
chart
internally,
and
you
can
get
a
sense
of
just
how
generous
bonuses
are
at
Latham:

(It’s
worth
mentioning
that
last
year,
top
bonuses
at
Latham
were
a
bit
lower
than
the
2024
bonuses
the
firm
is
offering.
For
the
2023
bonus
cycle,
the
top
bonus
for
second-years
was
$28,000,
while
the
top
bonus
for
seventh-years
was
$172,500.
Take
from
that
what
you
will
about
the
number
of
hours
associates
at
the
firm
were
able
to
bill.)

Bonus-eligible
associates
at
the
firm
will
receive
their
payouts
on
January
31.
Congratulations
to
everyone
at
the
firm!

Remember
everyone,
we
depend
on
your
tips
to
stay
on
top
of
compensation
updates,
so
when
your
firm
announces
or
matches,
please
text
us
(646-820-8477)
or email
us
 (subject
line:
“[Firm
Name]
Bonus/Matches”).
Please
include
the
memo
if
available.
You
can
take
a
photo
of
the
memo
and
send
it
via
text
or
email
if
you
don’t
want
to
forward
the
original
PDF
or
Word
file.

And
if
you’d
like
to
sign
up
for
ATL’s
Bonus
Alerts
(which
is
the
alert
list
we
also
use
for
salary
announcements),
please
scroll
down
and
enter
your
email
address
in
the
box
below
this
post.
If
you
previously
signed
up
for
the
bonus
alerts,
you
don’t
need
to
do
anything.
You’ll
receive
an
email
notification
within
minutes
of
each
bonus
announcement
that
we
publish.
Thanks
for
your
help!



Staci ZaretskyStaci
Zaretsky
 is
a
senior
editor
at
Above
the
Law,
where
she’s
worked
since
2011.
She’d
love
to
hear
from
you,
so
please
feel
free
to

email

her
with
any
tips,
questions,
comments,
or
critiques.
You
can
follow
her
on BlueskyX/Twitter,
and Threads, or
connect
with
her
on LinkedIn.

Morning Docket: 01.30.25 – Above the Law

*
AI
may
become
powerful
enough
to
destroy
humanity,
but
it’s
not
powerful
enough
to
defeat
the
copyright
lobby.
[Law360]

*
Maybe
illegal
streaming
of
the
Super
Bowl
will
spark
copyright
reform
(it
won’t).
[Sportico]

*
Putting
election
denying
riot
lawyer
in
charge
of
the
DC
US
Attorney’s
Office
is
certainly
a
choice.
[Newsweek]

*
Dechert
suing
lawyer
claiming
they
paid
her
too
much.
[ABA
Journal
]

*
Lawyer
drops
case
against
Morgan
&
Morgan
marking
the
first
time
they
can
brag
about
a
case

not

ending
in
a
multimillion
dollar
settlement.[Reuters]

*
Law
firms
can
find
success
playing
for
second.
[Bloomberg
Law
News
]

*
Former
Trump
lawyers
in
high
demand
on
the
private
market
as
whisperers.
[National
Law
Journal
]

The Company You Keep – See Also – Above the Law

Self
Described
Woman
Hater
Is
One
Of
The
Newest
Trump
Administration
Hires:
Great
to
be
in
good
hands.
Wonder
What
Justice
Roberts
Thinks
About
The
Spending
Freeze?:
He
already
wrote
about
it
at
length!
Let’s
see
if
his
opinion
changes
this
go
around.
Big
Law,
Bigger
Money:
Thanks
in
a
major
part
to
raising
rates!
They
Track
Trump
So
You
Don’t
Have
To:
Someone
has
to
keep
up
with
this
rush
of
executive
orders.
All’s
Well
That
Cromwell(s):
So
much
for
saying
no
to
representing
Trump.

Partners Chained To The Office More Than Associates At This Biglaw Firm – Above the Law



Ed.
Note:

Welcome
to
our
daily
feature

Trivia
Question
of
the
Day!


Which
233-year-old
Am
Law
100
firm
has
partners
in
the
office
four
days
a
week,
while
associates
are
only
required
to
come
to
the
office
Tuesday
though
Thursday?


Hint:
The
Biglaw
firm
was
also
the
first
top
100
firm
to
release
their
2024
financials,
revealing
a
15
percent
increase
in
revenue.



See
the
answer
on
the
next
page.

First Transgender Lawyer To Argue Before SCOTUS Hopes To Welcome More Trans Lawyers To High Court’s Bar – Above the Law

Chase
Strangio
(Photo
by
MICHAEL
TRAN/AFP
via
Getty
Images)



Ed.
note
:
Welcome
to
our
daily
feature,

Quote
of
the
Day
.


It
is
in
the
service
of
excellence
that
we
expand
the
Supreme
Court
bar,
and
the
people
who
are
in
court
as
litigators.
For
younger
trans
lawyers,
I
know
how
important
it
is
to
see
versions
of
yourself
reflected
in
different
spaces.




 Chase
Strangio
,
co-director
for
transgender
justice
with
the
ACLU’s
LGBTQ
&
HIV
Project
,
in
comments
given
to
the

ABA
Journal
,
concerning
the
addition
of
more
transgender
lawyers
to
the
Supreme
Court
bar.
Strangio
made
history
in
December
2024
as
the

first-ever
openly
transgender
lawyer

to
argue
before
the
Supreme
Court.
During
his
appearance
in U.S.
v.
Skrmetti
,
Strangio


shared
time
with
the
Biden
administration,
arguing
that
Tennessee’s
ban
on
gender
affirming
care
for
minors
violates
the
Constitution’s
equal
protection
clause
.


Staci Zaretsky




Staci
Zaretsky
 is
a
senior
editor
at
Above
the
Law,
where
she’s
worked
since
2011.
She’d
love
to
hear
from
you,
so
please
feel
free
to

email

her
with
any
tips,
questions,
comments,
or
critiques.
You
can
follow
her
on BlueskyX/Twitter,
and Threads, or
connect
with
her
on LinkedIn.

Trump DOJ Dismisses Stolen Docs Case It Used To Bury Special Counsel Report – Above the Law

In
the
world’s
least
surprising
plot
twist,
the
Justice
Department
has

withdrawn
its
appeal

to
the
Eleventh
Circuit
in
the
stolen
documents
case.
And


don’t
stop
the
presses!


Trump’s
henchmen
Walt
Nauta
and
Carlos
De
Oliveira
have
no
objection.

This
turn
of
events
became
inevitable
on
November
5,
when
Trump
won
the
election.
But
it’s
an
exceptional

fuck
you

in
light
of
everything
that
happened
in
the
past
three
weeks. 

To
refresh:
Trump’s
favorite
jurist,
Judge
Aileen
Cannon
of
the
Southern
District
of
Florida,
used
the
pending
appeal
as
justification
to

bury
half

of
Special
Counsel
Jack
Smith’s
final
report.
Her
theory
was
that
the
report
could
not
be
released,
even
in
camera,
to
the
leaders
of
the
House
and
Senate
Judiciary
Committee,
lest
its
conclusions
leak
and
damage
the
integrity
of
the
trial.

Of
course,
there
was
never
going
to
be
a
trial.
Judge
Cannon
dismissed
the
case
last
summer
on
the
theory
that
special
counsels
are

somehow
illegal


a
conclusion
which
managed
to
elude
every
other
jurist
who
examined
it,
including
the
ones
at
One
First
Street.
That
dismissal
was
on
appeal
to
the
Eleventh
Circuit,
which
would
appear
to
divest
the
trial
court
of
jurisdiction.
But
lack
of
jurisdiction
has
never
stopped
Judge
Cannon
before!

The
Eleventh
Circuit
declined
to
intervene
to
stop
the
special
counsel
from
publishing
Volume
1,
which
dealt
with
the
election
interference
case,
or
from
sharing
Volume
2
with
Congress.
But
the
appeals
court
refused
to
tell
Judge
Cannon
to
knock
it
off,
so
she
dutifully
dove
on
the
grenade.
On
the
Friday
before
Trump’s
inauguration,
she
held
a
hearing

complete
with
oral
argument
by
amici,
natch

before
deciding
that
release
of
the
report
would
compromise
the
cases
of
poor
Nauta
and
De
Oliveira.
But
that
decision
came
after
Trump
was
safely
sworn
in,
at
which
point
the
prospect
of

anyone

seeing
that
report
was
functionally
nil. 

Acting
Attorney
General
James
McHenry

fired

a
dozen
experienced
prosecutors
who
worked
on
the
special
counsel
investigation,
writing
“Given
your
significant
role
in
prosecuting
the
President,
I
do
not
believe
that
the
leadership
of
the
Department
can
trust
you
to
assist
in
implementing
the
President’s
agenda
faithfully.”
(Is
the
Justice
Department
supposed
to
be
“implementing
the
President’s
agenda
faithfully?”) 

Ed
Martin,
the
interim
US
Attorney
for
DC,
is
now

investigating

the
January
6
prosecutors
for
charging
so
many
defendants
with
obstructing
an
official
proceeding
under
18
USC
§
1512,
calling
it
the
“great
failure
of
our
office,”
and
dubbing
his
quest
“Project
1512.”
Martin,
a
former
Trump
PAC
official
who
marched
on
the
Capitol
on
January
6,
seems
unbothered
by
the
fact
that
every
trial
judge
but
one
agreed
with
the
DOJ’s
interpretation
of
the
law,
and
upwards
of
100
defendants
were
convicted
by
juries
under
it.

And
no
one
expects
Pam
Bondi
to
concern
herself
much
with
28
CFR
§
600.9
and
its
mandate
that
“The
Attorney
General
will
notify
the
Chairman
and
Ranking
Minority
Member
of
the
Judiciary
Committees
of
each
House
of
Congress”
of
the
special
counsel’s
declination
decisions,
along
with
an
explanation.
She’ll
probably
be
too
busy
indicting
Jack
Smith
for
malicious
jaywalking
and
cutting
Trump
a
$100
million
check
in
his

tort
suit

against
the
DOJ
for
the
“illegal”
judicially
authorized
search
of
Mar-a-Lago.

Dismissing
the
appeal
means
the
DOJ
is
now
stuck
with
Judge
Cannon’s
fakakta
precedent
on
special
counsels.
It’s
a
small
price
to
pay
to
blow
up
the
last
vestiges
of
accountability
for
the
man
who
tried
to
mount
a
coup
to
stay
in
power.
The
Trump
administration
can
always
ignore
the
ruling
when
they
want
to
appoint
a
special
counsel
to
prosecute
Jack
Smith

they’re
certainly
not
averse
to
ignoring
laws
and
precedents
as
the
situation
requires.





Liz
Dye
 lives
in
Baltimore
where
she
produces
the
Law
and
Chaos substack and podcast.