Robert Mugabe dies aged 95 – The Zimbabwean

6.9.2019 7:28

Robert Mugabe served as Zimbabwean Prime Minister from 1980 to 1987 and then as President from 1987 to 2017.

JOHANNESBURG – Former Zimbabwean revolutionary, politician and president, Robert Mugabe died aged 95 on Friday.

The former Zimbabwe president had been battling ill health and was receiving treatment in Singapore.

He served as Zimbabwean Prime Minister from 1980 to 1987 and then as President from 1987 to 2017.

Mugabe was ousted from power in Zimbabwe.

Zimbabwe’s Prime Minister Robert Mugabe. Mugabe, Zimbabwean first Premier (in 1980) and President (in 1987), was born in Kutama in 1924 (formerly Southern Rhodesia).

AFP

Zimbabwe President Emmerson Mnangagwa said on twitter, “it is with the utmost sadness that I announce the passing on of Zimbabwe’s founding father and former President, Cde Robert Mugabe.”

“Cde Mugabe was an icon of liberation, a pan-Africanist who dedicated his life to the emancipation and empowerment of his people. His contribution to the history of our nation and continent will never be forgotten. May his soul rest in eternal peace.”

Tributes pour in for Robert Mugabe
Robert Mugabe, former Zimbabwe president, dies aged 95

Post published in: Featured

Robert Mugabe, former Zimbabwe president, dies aged 95 – The Zimbabwean

Robert Mugabe, a hero of Africa’s independence struggle whose long rule in Zimbabwe descended into tyranny, corruption and incompetence, has died at the age of 95, president Emmerson Mnangagwa has said.

In a statement early on Friday, Mnangagwa called Mugabe “an icon of liberation, a pan-Africanist who dedicated his life to the emancipation and empowerment of his people. His contribution to the history of our nation and continent will never be forgotten. May his soul rest in eternal peace.”

The passing of the former president, who ruled Zimbabwe for close to four decades before being ousted in a military takeover in November 2017, marks the definitive end of an era in the history of the former British colony.

Mugabe is believed to have died in Singapore, where he made frequent visits to receive medical care in recent months as his health deteriorated. As far back as November 2018, Mnangagwa, who took over from him as president, told members of the ruling Zanu-PF party that Mugabe could no longer walk.

Though once widely celebrated for his role in fighting the white supremacist regime in his homeland, Mugabe had long become a deeply divisive figure in his own country and across the continent.

His final years in power were characterised by financial collapse, surges of violent intimidation and a vicious internal power struggle pitting his wife Grace, 41 years younger, against Mnangagwa, his former righthand man.

The rivalry was resolved when Mnangagwa, a Zanu-PF stalwart, took power when Mugabe reluctantly resigned after a military takeover. The news of his decision prompted widespread rejoicing.

 President Emmerson Mnangagwa, at a rally in Murombedzi, a town in the Mashonaland West province of Zimbabwe, in November 2018. Photograph: Jekesai Njikizana/AFP/Getty Images

In the decades since Zimbabwe gained independence from Britain in 1980, power had concentrated in Mugabe’s hands. Before Mnangagwa took over, an entire generation of Zimbabweans knew no other leader.

After his fall, Mugabe was granted the status of a respected father of the nation and a generous pension by the new government. The move angered his many opponents and upset many of the victims of his regime.

But Mugabe’s own frustration and sense of humiliation over his ousting were clear, however, and voiced with typical rhetorical force at an extraordinary press conference in the grounds of his residence in Harare, the capital, days before elections in July 2018.

Mugabe, flanked by his wife, suggested he would vote for the opposition Movement for Democratic Change, a party he had brutally suppressed before co-opting it in 2008 to form a supposed unity government that he still dominated.

Until the end he retained friends on the African continent but increasingly became an international pariah. Mugabe was stripped of an honorary knighthood by the British government in 2008.

Educated at Catholic missionary schools, Mugabe became a teacher in Ghana then returned to Rhodesia in 1960 to fight white minority rule. He was jailed for 10 years and fled to neighbouring Mozambique, where he became one of the leaders of the guerrilla forces fighting Ian Smith’s regime.

Then a leader of Rhodesian fighters, Robert Mugabe attends a meeting in Dar es Salaam in Tanzania, with George Silundika, deputy secretary of information in the African National Congress, and Joshua Nkomo, the leader of the Zapu party

 Then a leader of Rhodesian fighters, Robert Mugabe attends a meeting in Dar es Salaam in Tanzania, with George Silundika, deputy secretary of information in the African National Congress, and Joshua Nkomo, the leader of the Zapu party Photograph: Keystone-France/Gamma-Keystone via Getty Images

Eventually freedom was won and Mugabe promised to embrace the country’s white population. He led the country through a golden period of economic growth and educational development that was the envy of Africa.

The international community turned a blind eye, however, to human rights abuses, most notably the 1980s ethnic cleansing of at least 20,000 people in Matabeleland province that crushed opposition from his rival Joshua Nkomo, the leader of the rival Zapu.

Opposition rose again in 1999 as the economy floundered and trade unions organised around the Movement for Democratic Change. Mugabe rigged elections and began a programme of land reform in which white farmers were forcibly evicted to make way for Zanu-PF party cronies or black Zimbabweans who lacked the skills and capital to farm.

This helped throw the economy into disarray, leaving Zimbabweans to rely on foreign food aid to avoid starvation. Hyperinflation ran riot and supermarket shelves were empty. The once-proud school and health systems began to crumble.

Mugabe election posters of are covered in opposition MDC slogans, in Harare, 2008.

 Mugabe election posters of are covered in opposition MDC slogans, in Harare, 2008. Photograph: EPA

The political environment also became increasingly hostile, with activists and journalists persecuted, jailed or murdered. More than 200 people died in political violence around the 2008 election, which Mugabe was widely seen as having stolen from the MDC’s Morgan Tsvangirai.

The late John Makumbe, a politics professor at the University of Zimbabwe, said: “He’ll be remembered as a villain. His legacy was destroyed by his staying, his violence, his imposing his own political allies and rivals.

“Robert Mugabe always had the seed of bad governance, cruelty, selfishness: ‘It’s only me who matters.’ He came in 1980 and donors flooded in; Mugabe looked angelic, he took on the colour of his surroundings. But by 2000 he had to rig elections and the rot had set in.

“The chameleon has its own colour: when it’s frightened, it takes on its original colour, and it’s ugly. He showed his true colours. His true colour is a killer. He killed his enemies.”

Robert and Grace Mugabe. The former president’s second wife remains a controversial figure in Zimbabwe.

 Robert and Grace Mugabe. The former president’s second wife remains a controversial figure in Zimbabwe. Photograph: Philimon Bulawayo/Reuters

Mugabe’s second wife, Grace, became known for her lavish lifestyle, and joined the Zanu-PF politburo by virtue of her leadership of the party’s influential Women’s League in 2014.

She became a political liability for the ageing autocrat, however, and her outspoken criticism of Mnangagwa was one of the triggers for the military takeover that ousted her husband.

Mugabe remained devoted to his wife, calling her “my Grace” in his last press conference and demanding better treatment for his spouse from Zimbabwe’s new rulers.

Border Wall Money Taken From Alaska Missile Interceptors, Shipyards & More

A Ground-Based Interceptor is lowered into its missile silo in Alaska.

PENTAGON: The Pentagon is diverting money for Ground-based Midcourse Defense missile interceptors in Alaska meant to defend the US against North Korean ballistic missiles to pay for President Trump’s border wall, according to newly released Pentagon documents. 

The $8 million allocated by Congress for the missile field at Fort Greely, Alaska, was set to add two missile interceptors as a backup for when the existing 40 interceptors need to undergo repair and maintenance. But due to the $3.6 billion the White House ordered the Pentagon to shift to border wall construction, the money will be stripped.

“The missile field at Fort Greely is actually incredibly important for us and our strategy,” a Pentagon official, who insisted on anonymity, told reporters. “We don’t see any impact to the strategy or the work that’s going to be done at that silo through putting it on the list, or for a potential delay.”

Fort Greely already has 40 interceptors, and Congress has funded 20 more for the base in the coming years. The work on the new silos was set to begin in 2021, but until Congress sees fit to put the money back into a future budget, the work has been taken off the books. 

If the cuts stay in place with no replacement funds in coming years the Navy, which is struggling with maintenance and repair issues, will take a real hit. A Ship Maintenance Facility in Portsmouth,. Va. is set to lose $26.1 million  while another pier and maintenance facility at the Navy’s base in Kitsap, Washington, would lose an additional $88.9 million.

The interceptor and shipyard cuts are part of 127 projects being “deferred” by the Pentagon in the hopes that lawmakers put the money back in when funding future budgets. The Republican-led Senate has already agreed to replace the cash in its annual defense policy bill, but the Democratic-led House rejected the idea in its version of the bill. Now that Congress is back in town after its August recess, the two sides will get to work negotiating a compromise bill for fiscal 2020 before they send it to the president’s desk for approval.

Texas Rep. Mac Thornberry, ranking member of the House Armed Services Committee whose state is losing $38 million in military construction funding, said in a statement, “we continue to face a very real crisis at the southern border,” while expressing “regret” the president “has been forced to divert funding for our troops to address the crisis.” He called for Congress to restore the military construction funding diverted for border security.

“We have been given a lawful order by the president to respond to this crisis on the border and we’re doing that,” the Pentagon official said. “We requested money for a backfill to replace the money for these projects that we have to defer.” 

On Tuesday, Defense Secretary Mark Esper signed off on the plan to pull $3.6 billion in military construction funds to build 175 miles of walls and barriers along the US southern border, the first half of which will be available immediately for transfer to the Department of Homeland Security. 

That first $1.8 billion was originally slated for construction projects overseas, with the rest coming available if needed. Members of Congress from affected states were briefed on the funding shifts over the past two days, and foreign governments informed Wednesday, Pentagon officials said. 

The Pentagon is hoping that foreign governments will foot the bill for the Milcon funding slated for their countries, and is preparing to “discuss partnership with our allies on potential burden sharing,” the official explained. When asked, the official added that no ally has so far offered to pick up the tab for the $1.8 billion pulled from base upgrades planned for US and joint facilities overseas. 

US forces in Japan are being asked to defer almost $400 million worth of Special Operations facilities, school construction, and air base repairs, while about $130 million worth of projects in Poland — which is looking to house more US troops — is being deferred. 

Included on the list were $400 million in DoD projects to repair facilities in Puerto Rico damaged by Hurricane Maria two years ago.

Major #Legaltech News As Clio Gets $250M Investment; Adds Avvo Founder Mark Britton to Board | LawSites

Cloud law practice management company Clio is today announcing a $250 million Series D funding — one of the largest investments ever for a legal technology company and the largest ever for a Canadian company.

Clio is also announcing that Mark Britton, who founded Avvo in 2006 and sold it last year to Internet Brands, is joining its board of directors.

Clio is holding an event later today in its Vancouver headquarters to provide more details on the investment. I will attend and provide additional information as time permits. Here is what we know so far.

The investment is from two growth equity companies, TCV and JMI Equity. TCV is an investor in well-known companies such as AirBNB, Expedia, Facebook, Fandango, LinkedIn and NetFlix, and in the law-related companies Avvo and LegalZoom. JMI’s portfolio spans a broad range of industries.

Jack Newton, CEO and cofounder, said in a statement that this investment will accelerate Clio’s ability to realize its vision of enabling lawyers to more easily deliver their services and make those services more accessible.

“Over three-quarters of legal problems don’t receive legal assistance, yet lawyers are struggling to find new clients,” Newton said. “It’s clear that something in the system is broken.

“Clio is committed to building the essential operating system for lawyers, one that focuses relentlessly on unlocking new efficiencies and entry points to legal services. This will allow legal professionals to easily deliver exceptional client experiences, increase their productivity, grow their firms, and make legal services more accessible.”

Founded a decade ago as the first cloud-based practice management program, Clio has had two prior rounds of funding, totallying $26 million.

With this latest investment, the company said, it will create cloud-based solutions designed to help law firms deliver client-centered experiences and make legal services more widely accessible.

Clio said that its customers can expect to see ongoing investment in the depth and breadth of Clio’s offerings, with new and enhanced tools for legal professionals to manage and grow their practices.

“At TCV, we partner with innovative companies that are leaders in their industry and offer superior value propositions for their customers,” said Amol Helekar, principal at TCV and a member of Clio’s board of directors. “Clio has had long-standing success in transforming a vast industry that has been lagging in technology adoption and we are confident the company will
continue to lead on a global scale.”

“Clio is not only solving some of the biggest pain points for the legal profession, it is creating a platform for the future of legal services, and we look forward to partnering with the team in the company’s continued growth and success,” said Sureel Sheth, principal at JMI.

Among the largest investments in legal technology to date have been the $500 million secondary investment last year in LegalZoom, the $200 million investment this year in Onit, the $100 million investment last year in Exterro, and the $100 million investment in 2017 in Litera.

Former Top Prosecutor, SEC Official Could Have Kicked Back And Taken It Easy But Instead Is Becoming Guggenheim Partners’ Lawyer

Robert Khuzami apparently does not like to sleep.

A New Way To Avoid Associate Burnout: Offer Credit Hours For Non-Billable Work

(Image via Getty)

Firms should consider the additional approach of enhancing associate opportunities to participate in meaningful non-billable work and to have such work credited in the same way that billable work is credited. Such opportunities could include traditional pro bono work, as well as engagement in diversity and student pipeline initiatives and nonprofit board service.

Roger Juan Maldonado, president of the New York City Bar Association and a partner at Smith, Gambrell & Russell, offering a suggestion on how Biglaw firms can combat associate burnout, in addition to increases in paid leave time and partner transparency.


Staci ZaretskyStaci Zaretsky is a senior editor at Above the Law, where she’s worked since 2011. She’d love to hear from you, so please feel free to email her with any tips, questions, comments, or critiques. You can follow her on Twitter or connect with her on LinkedIn.

The California Bar Is Still Clamping Down On Fee Splitting With Nonlawyers

(Photo via Getty Images)

A State Bar of California task force is exploring whether attorneys should be permitted to split fees with nonlawyers in certain circumstances.

But while the panel’s closely scrutinized work to develop final recommendations for overhauling legal ethics rules is ongoing, the State Bar is still cracking down on attorneys who violate the prohibition on fee splitting with nonlawyers.

Lawyer James Mark Meizlik of Los Angeles will begin serving a one-year suspension on Saturday for admitting to violating Rule of Professional Conduct 1-320(A).

Meizlik rented office space from Alliance Solution Network, which provided administrative support for his firm.

However, a client of Meizlik’s paid $8,000 in legal fees to Alliance Solution Network, which kept $5,500.

“By allowing Alliance Solution Network to collect legal fees on respondent’s behalf and also allowing ASN to keep some of those fees for its own purposes,” Meizlik willfully violated the prohibition on sharing fees with nonlawyers, according to Meizlik’s settlement with the State Bar’s discipline unit.

Meizlik had been disciplined twice previously by the California Supreme Court for activities involving nonlawyers.

In 2000, he received a private reproval for violating then-Rule of Professional Conduct 3-110(A) for failing to perform competently and properly supervise a nonlawyer staff member.

“That non-attorney staff member then accepted the representation of a client without advising respondent,” according to the bar. “The non-attorney staff member also accepted fees from the client that he failed to pass on to respondent.”

In 2003, the Supreme Court stayed a two-year suspension of Meizlik and instead placed him on probation for admitting to misconduct involving his use of nonlawyers to provide legal services to clients.

One matter involved the same nonlawyer staff member receiving $1,000 in fees from a client and performing legal services on the client’s behalf.

“Unfortunately, the client was a defendant in a civil lawsuit, and the non-attorney was understandably not equipped to defend her,” according to the bar.

A second matter prompting the 2003 discipline featured the nonlawyer staff member working on a client’s marital dissolution while failing to be properly supervised by Meizlik.

The State Bar mentioned Meizlik’s prior discipline in explaining the punishment it sought for him.

“Since the current misconduct is respondent’s third discipline, and because the two prior instances of discipline significantly aggravate respondent’s misconduct in this instance, significant discipline is warranted,” the bar wrote.

The agreed-to discipline for his most recent misconduct supported by the state Supreme Court was a two-year suspension featuring a one-year actual suspension that will continue until Meizlik provides evidence of his rehabilitation.


Lyle Moran is a freelance writer in San Diego who handles both journalism and content writing projects. He previously reported for the Los Angeles Daily Journal, San Diego Daily Transcript, Associated Press, and Lowell Sun. He can be reached at lmoransun@gmail.com and found on Twitter @lylemoran.