‘It’s a nightmare’: Zimbabwe struggles with hyperinflation – The Zimbabwean

A woman does a quick calculation on her phone before buying groceries at a shop in Harare, in this Wednesday, Oct, 9, 2019 photo. Hyperinflation is changing prices so quickly in the southern African nation that what you would see displayed on a supermarket shelf might change by the time you reach the checkout. (AP Photo/Tsvangirayi Mukwazhi)

Hyperinflation is changing prices so quickly in Zimbabwe that what you see displayed on a supermarket shelf might change by the time you reach the checkout.

“It is a nightmare,” Macheku said. “I can’t plan.”

Before a coup unseated the late president Robert Mugabe in late 2017, Macheku could afford all his family’s basics on his salary, which equals about $24. Now the same amount can hardly buy 4 kilograms (8.8 pounds) of beef.

He ended up buying chicken skin for his family’s supper. “I cannot afford the actual chicken,” he said. It is the closest his family gets to eating meat.

Zimbabwe now has the world’s second highest inflation after Venezuela, according to International Monetary Fund figures. The southern African nation went through this a decade ago but says there is no getting used to it, and coping has become both creative and desperate.

This time Zimbabwe’s economy has been on a downward spiral for more than a year as hopes fade that Mugabe’s successor and former deputy, President Emmerson Mnangagwa, will deliver on his promises of prosperity.

“Anyone who thinks a solution is in sight must be very brave,” said economist John Robertson in the capital, Harare. “Government officials don’t want to admit the real causes and don’t want to fix the real problems. People should brace for worse.” He said the real causes include the government spending beyond its means.

To shop, money alone is no longer enough. Calculators, mobile phones and notebooks have become necessary tools. In one sparsely attended groceries wholesaler, there were more people taking pictures of price stickers than those picking items from shelves.

“I sent the pictures to my husband. We have to decide fast before the prices go up again,” said one shopper, Marianne Hove. “He is in another supermarket sending me pictures of the prices there. We compare and decide which items to buy and from where.”

Others did quick calculations and called home to confirm items to buy.

In other shops, prices are only available at the checkout – and even then the cashier might stop a customer mid-payment to change prices.

Retailers said they would go out of business if they don’t adjust prices frequently.

“It is becoming increasingly impossible to appropriately price goods. The replacement value has been our Achilles heel,” said Denford Mutashu, president of the Confederation of Zimbabwe Retailers.

The situation is “synonymous with hyperinflation” even though the government statistics office has stopped publishing annual inflation data, Mutashu said.

Some businesses are closing while others are limiting their product range to reduce risk, he said.

Prices in Zimbabwe are changing faster than at any point in a decade. In 2009, the country’s currency collapsed under the weight of hyperinflation. The government then adopted a multi-currency system dominated by the dollar.

This year the government outlawed the use of foreign currencies, part of frequent and sometimes confusing changes to the country’s complicated monetary framework.

The local currency has been rapidly devaluing, “fostering high inflation, which reached almost 300 percent in August,” the IMF said after a review mission last month.

Weakening confidence, policy uncertainty and a continuation of foreign currency market distortions are exerting pressure on the exchange rate, the IMF added, while a severe drought and foreign debt hampering Zimbabwe’s access to external funding have impacted the economy hard.

Most businesses import products from abroad due to the collapse of local industry. Foreign currency shortages and rapid devaluation of the local currency are hard on both businesses and customers.

Zimbabwe’s president, Mnangagwa, continues to appeal for more time.

“Getting the economy working again from being dead will require time, patience, unity of purpose and perseverance,” he said in a state of the nation address on Oct. 1.

Like Mugabe, the president largely blames U.S. sanctions for the crisis, while the U.S. points out that the sanctions don’t target the government but selected officials, including Mnangagwa himself, over past alleged human rights abuses.

The patience of many Zimbabweans is wearing thin, considering the lengths they are going to cope.

“We cannot continue to live like this. Why did they remove Mugabe if they had no solutions?” said Harare resident Praise Sibanda.

“We are tired of 001,” she said, using the local slang for the growing trend of families resorting to a single meal a day.

Some innovative vendors have begun repackaging items such as cooking oil into sachets small enough to prepare a single meal.

According to the Consumer Council of Zimbabwe, people are increasingly using such sachets known as “tsaona,” a word in the local Shona language that means “accident.”

Bindura councillor pleads not guilty in trial over anti-Mnangagwa slur – The Zimbabwean

President Emmerson Mnangagwa

A BINDURA man on Wednesday 9 October 2019 pleaded not guilty to charges of disorderly conduct as his trial for allegedly stating that President Emmerson Mnangagwa is liable for causing the suffering that
citizens are currently enduring and for authoring the country’s economic crisis.

Brian Kembo, a resident of Bindura in Mashonaland Central province, who is also a Councillor for
Ward 3 appeared before Magistrate Maria Musika who presided over his trial on Wednesday 9 October
2019.

During the trial, prosecutors alleged that the 36-year-old Kembo, who is represented by Idirashe Chikomba of Zimbabwe Lawyers for Human Rights (ZLHR) engaged in disorderly conduct when he allegedly stated that several people in Zimbabwe were stressed owing to President Mnangagwa’s failure to fix the country’s economic crisis after winning the 2018 presidential election.

The prosecutors claimed that Kembo boarded a commuter omnibus on 24 October 2018 in Bindura where during a conversation with another resident he blamed President Mnangagwa for failing to alleviate the current economic crisis, which has led to price hikes of basic commodities in the country.

Two witnesses have testified against Kembo, who returns to court on Thursday 24 October 2019, when
Magistrate Musika is expected to hand down her ruling on his application for discharge at the close of the prosecution case.

Meanwhile, Bindura Magistrate Langton Ndokera on Tuesday 8 October 2019 set free Saymore
Mashorokoto who had been on trial on charges of disorderly conduct for allegedly telling Tichaona
Svinurai, a fellow resident that President Mnangagwa had dismally failed to revive the country’s political and economic fortunes and that he should hand over power to opposition MDC Alliance party leader Nelson Chamisa.

During trial, prosecutors said the the 45 year-old Mashorokoto, who was charged with contravening section 41(b) of the Criminal Law (Codification and Reform) Act, had acted in a disorderly conduct and had used threatening, abusive, or insulting words intending to provoke a breach of the peace or realising that there was a real risk or possibility that a breach of the peace may be provoked.

But Magistrate Ndokera acquitted Mashorokoto, who was represented by Tinomuda Shoko and Blessing
Nyamaropa of ZLHR, after ruling that the evidence presented in court during the trial by the State does not warrant a conviction.

Magistrate Ndokera ruled that there was no evidence presented in court to corroborate the testimony of the witness who testified in court against Kembo.

Magistrate Ndokera also stated that before bringing such cases as Kembo’s to court, the complainant and
ZRP should seriously consider the impact they pose to the country.

Activists’ closed-minded attitudes are destroying Zimbabwe
SADC/AU get this through your heads – sanctions not responsible for our suffering in Zimbabwe

Post published in: Featured

Neuberger Berman, Saba Capital Disagree On Definition Of ‘Winning’

You’d think it wouldn’t matter, given that both agree on the practical implications, but the hedge fund hopes the SEC sees it differently.

They Didn’t Teach This in Law School: Interviewing Clients Who Have Experienced Trauma

Client relations is one of the most important – and difficult – aspects of lawyering, and when your clients have experienced serious trauma, you need to bring your full set of tools to the table. You need to navigate boundaries and potential triggers carefully, while also getting all the information you need to build your case and advocate for your client. Check out the following tips from Best Practices for Interviewing Traumatized Clients to help you navigate this sensitive process and grow as an attorney.

Understand how trauma manifests. Trauma can cause significant changes to the brain. From altering memories to causing someone to relive a traumatic event, trauma causes the brain to rewire itself.

Believe your clients. Members of marginalized groups (such as non-citizens and LGBTQ individuals) have frequently been mistreated by state institutions and are rightfully afraid – not just paranoid. Remember that trauma is a subjective experience – a single sexual assault may be just as traumatic as serial abuse. This is about the client’s personal experience – not an attorney’s opinion.

Make your client comfortable. This is key to a successful interview. A few tips: Let the client know about any security check procedures in the building beforehand. Create a space that feels safe – ensure that there is a visible exit in the room. Provide gum or mints and water. For LGTBQ clients, let them know if there will be gender neutral bathrooms available.

Prepare your interview questions with trauma in mind. Acknowledge that some of the questions you ask will be “stupid.” Don’t apologize more than twice – this can make clients feel like they have to make you feel better. Find ways to ask about trauma indirectly (for example, don’t ask “Are you a victim of domestic abuse?” but instead “How was your life growing up? Were there any windows in your room? Were you allowed to use the bathroom when you wanted?”). Don’t ask for specific dates – these are hard to remember – but about the season or holiday. Educate yourself on what being transgender means before you interview a transgender client. Make small talk. Say thank you.

Take care of yourself. Many attorneys will suffer from vicarious trauma – constant exposure to clients’ trauma can cause attorneys to experience similar symptoms. To combat this, count your wins. Send dog videos and memes to your friends. Remember how vital this kind of work is.

For more tips like this, check out What Lawyers Need to Know About Representing Clients Affected by Trauma.

*This article was prepared with assistance from Tamanna Saidi, a pre-law sophomore at Baruch College in New York City.

vLex Partners with LexBlog to Add 400,000 Blog Posts to Global Research Collection | LawSites

The international legal research service vLex has partnered with the legal blogging company LexBlog to add more than 400,000 law-related blog posts to its collection of legal-research materials, which currently spans some 100 jurisdictions, including the United States.

As a result of this partnership, legal researchers using vLex will now have direct access to legal news, insights and analysis from the LexBlog network of more than 23,000 individual bloggers writing on more than 1,400 blogs covering virtually every area of law. Estimated to include more than 400,000 blog posts, the collection will continue to grow with new posts added through regular updates.

These LexBlog blogs will become of a new blog category that vLex launched in July, originally with some 300,000 articles provided by the article-distribution service JD Supra.

[Disclosure: I work for LexBlog as publisher and editor-in-chief of LexBlog.com]

When you perform a search, you can narrow results to show matching blog posts.

vLex users will be able to access this blog content in multiple ways:

  • By choosing the “Browse” function and then selecting blogs. (See the image above.) Users can then view blog posts sorted by most recent, most relevant or most popular, and apply filters to narrow the blog results shown.
  • As part of their customizable news feed, blogs will be available to them as a category of news content, where they will be able to search for blogs and add them to their feeds.
  • In search results, when blogs are relevant to the search query. Blog posts will be included in overall search results, and the user can select the Blogs category in the sidebar to filter search results to show only blog posts. (At this time, the blog category does not appear in the sidebar in all countries where vLex operates, but it is in the U.S. and Canadian versions).
  • Through Vincent, vLex’s AI-powered brief-analysis tool, when blog posts are relevant to the brief, memorandum or other document the user has uploaded for analysis.

“The addition of LexBlog content on vLex will provide our customers with a much richer experience and enable them to access legal news, expert commentary and the important legal content they require all in one location,” Lluis Faus, vLex cofounder & CEO, said in a statement. “We’re pleased to be working with an established and trusted organization who provide much-needed content direct from law firms and well-known authors to our sector.”

“LexBlog is honored to play a role in the advancement and the administration of the law,” Kevin O’Keefe, LexBlog founder and CEO, said. “With legal insight and commentary moving from traditional law journals and law reviews to legal blogs, legal research platforms lacked a central source for this secondary law. As the ‘aggregator and curator of record’ for legal blogs, LexBlog welcomed the opportunity to serve vLex customers. vLex’s mission of delivering the world’s legal knowledge, one country at a time, fits right in with our mission of connecting lawyers with people, for good.”

Bottom Line

In the legal profession, blogs have become a leading source of news, analysis and commentary. As we have found at LexBlog, there are literally thousands and thousands of legal professionals writing blogs. They cover topics ranging from reporting on a just-decided case to analyzing long-term trends to discussing the business of law to offering how-to’s on various aspects of law and practice.

Given this, it makes sense that a legal research service should include blogs within the scope of its searches. In much the same way that law reviews once did, blogs provide context, analysis and insights around cases, statutes and regulations. They help a researcher better understand the cases they find in the course of their searches.

In fact, it seems to me that a research service that does not include blogs is significantly incomplete. If blogs are a central aspect of what’s being said about the law, then they should be a central aspect of research on the law.

Prominent Conservative Lawyers Supporting Impeachment

(Photo by JIM WATSON/AFP/Getty Images)

Apparently the growing Ukraine scandal enveloping the presidency of Donald Trump is just too much for some conservatives, and they’re bucking the GOP trend of backing the president no matter what. Sixteen prominent conservative attorneys have authored a letter, published by Checks & Balances, in support of an “expeditious impeachment investigation”:

“We believe the acts revealed publicly over the past several weeks are fundamentally incompatible with the president’s oath of office, his duties as commander in chief, and his constitutional obligation to ‘take care that the laws be faithfully executed.’ These acts, based on what has been revealed to date, are a legitimate basis for an expeditious impeachment investigation, vote in the House of Representatives and potential trial in the Senate.”

And who, exactly are the conservatives taking this stand? Biglaw/in-house counsel are well represented with Wachtell counsel and tweeter extraordinaire George Conway III, natch; former acting U.S. attorney general and current Sidley Austin partner Peter Keisler; Kirkland & Ellis partner and a former State Department official, Andrew Sagor; former Thomas clerk and senior associate at King & Spalding Marisa Maleck; former chairman of the Federal Election Commission and Caplin & Drysdale partner Trevor Potter; Boies Schiller Flexner partner and former deputy associate White House director of communications Jaime Sneider; general counsel to the Center for a New American Security Carrie Cordero; Stuart M. Gerson, partner at Epstien Becker Green and former Acting Attorney General of the United States;  Sidley partner Alan Charles Raul, who served as  Vice Chairman of the White House Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board; retired Jones Day attorney Jonathan C. Rose; and former Justice Department lawyer and retired Jones Day partner, Donald Ayer. Plus a hefty dose of legal academics: Harvard Law School professor Charles Fried; Orin Kerr of University of California Berkeley School of Law; J.W. Verret of George Mason University Antonin Scalia School of Law; and Jonathan Adler of Case Western Reserve University School of Law.

As Ayer noted, there’s a lot of frustration behind the letter:

“I am disgusted by the conduct of Republican senators who pose as reputable people, but shamelessly hide under rocks instead of calling out the president’s horrendous behavior as the gross misconduct that they know it to be.”

We’ll see if anyone in the Republican party is listening.


headshotKathryn Rubino is a Senior Editor at Above the Law, and host of The Jabot podcast. AtL tipsters are the best, so please connect with her. Feel free to email her with any tips, questions, or comments and follow her on Twitter (@Kathryn1).

Halloween-Themed Legal Tech Podcast In Case That’s Exactly What You Need For The Holiday

Some people blast eerie sounds from their house to spook trick or treaters. But if you’re obsessed with improving productivity in the legal space through targeted deployment of cutting-edge technology — preferably with some machine learning — then this might be the soundtrack to your Halloween.

In a recent episode of LAWsome, Jess Birken went all Orson Welles with the radio play antics and recorded a Halloween skit about the real challenge for a tech-minded law firm: piecing together different and questionably compatible tech solutions to build a functional law firm. Bringing us the most eDiscovery focused adaptation of Mary Shelley out there.

Bravo.

Check it out here.


HeadshotJoe Patrice is a senior editor at Above the Law and co-host of Thinking Like A Lawyer. Feel free to email any tips, questions, or comments. Follow him on Twitter if you’re interested in law, politics, and a healthy dose of college sports news. Joe also serves as a Managing Director at RPN Executive Search.

Lawyer Reflects On Mental Health After Surviving Attempt To Take His Own Life

Mental health disorders are fatal, [but they are treatable.]

People around you care about you more than you think.

— Eric Lang, a former Biglaw attorney who now runs his own practice in Georgia, in comments given at a recent talk entitled “Confronting Mental Health Issues in Your Profession.” Several years ago, Lang attempted to die by suicide, but survived the ordeal and feels lucky to have found doctors and colleagues who have helped him.

(If you are a state bar member and you are concerned about yourself or another bar member, the Lawyer Assistance Program’s confidential helpline is 800-327-9631.)


Staci ZaretskyStaci Zaretsky is a senior editor at Above the Law, where she’s worked since 2011. She’d love to hear from you, so please feel free to email her with any tips, questions, comments, or critiques. You can follow her on Twitter or connect with her on LinkedIn.