5th Circuit never sleeps.
—ADVERTISEMENT—
Love ATL? Let’s make it official.
Sign up for our newsletter.
We will never sell or share your information without your consent. See our privacy policy.
Category Added in a WPeMatico Campaign
—ADVERTISEMENT—
We will never sell or share your information without your consent. See our privacy policy.
According to the U.S. News & World Report rankings, which top 14 law school has the least expensive tuition?
Hint: There are currently 976 people enrolled at the school getting the good price for an elite legal education.
See the answer on the next page.
Most lawyers love to read (it’s a terrible profession to go into if you don’t), but it can be a struggle to carve the time out of your busy schedule to read for pleasure. If your New Year’s resolution is to read more – or if you are looking for a last minute gift for a lawyer in your life – then you need a reading list. To put this list together we polled our faculty to find out what they read in 2019 that they would recommend for all attorneys, law-related or not. Some interesting data emerged from the responses: for example, only one-quarter of the faculty recommended novels, instead gravitating mostly towards non-fiction. And while very few of the featured titles relate directly to the law, almost everyone who responded said these books had an impact on their practice.
So for lawyers looking for their next great read, we present 20 Books to Read in 2020:
Fiction
Non-Fiction
Happy Reading to one and all!
Related Content
The House of Representatives voted to impeach President Donald Trump and now, we await his Senate trial to determine acquittal or removal.
But as Lee Corso might say: “not so fast my friend.” In the face of Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell’s unprecedented promise to achieve the President’s acquittal through bias and corruption, a building consensus is moving towards holding the Articles of Impeachment, refusing to formally “transmit” them to the Senate, until McConnell agrees to some basic form of a fair trial and the calling of witnesses.
Harvard Law Professor Laurence Tribe has tried to give this argument legal gravitas. In an op-ed in the Washington Post, he wrote:
Some have asked what would give the House power to take the step of impeaching the president but withhold pressing its articles of impeachment in the Senate. This question assumes that everything the House opts not to do, every option it chooses not to exercise, requires that it locate affirmative power for its inaction in some textual snippet in the Constitution.
I’d turn the question around: Where in the Constitution or in the history or theory of its interpretation is that principle located? In fact, it is entirely made up, found nowhere in our constitutional constellation. And it is out of place when considering how the House and Senate are to interact in cases of impeachment, particularly cases in which a president is being impeached for defying his oath and the Senate is threatening to defy its oath as well.
Look, I’m all about asking for forgiveness instead of permission. And I agree, intellectually, with the thrust of Tribe’s argument that the Constitution does not, and was not intended to, contemplate the entire universe of what is or isn’t legal in this country.
But, at core, I’m not wild about the legal arguments made in defense of this tactical strategy, because they’re not really legal arguments. It’s a raw political power play. By withholding the Articles of Impeachment, Democrats are saying “we can, and you can’t stop me.” It’s not unlike me taking the iPad away from my kid: I can, he can’t beat me up, if he wants it back he better eat two more chicken nuggets. It’s not a procedural argument, I’m just bigger.
The problem with these kind of power plays is that it’s fundamentally lawless. There’s no legal or Constitutional value advanced by through this parliamentary loophole. We just want McConnell to do something (his job) and we’re trying to force him to do it. I’d rather not drag the Constitution into the game.
Which isn’t to say that I’m unwilling to play. The last time I saw somebody use raw political power to subvert the normal functioning of government because the Constitution didn’t explicitly disallow it, Mitch McConnell was grinning over the corpse of Merrick Garland. Mitch McConnell can eat it and I’m willing to use any means, fair or unfair, to achieve even the most Pyrrhic victory over him.
I’m willing to go full Elliot Ness: “I have broken every law I have sworn to uphold, I have become what I beheld and I am content that I have done right!”
I just don’t want to pretend about what’s going on here. This is not society. We’re in the state of nature now.
Don’t let Mitch McConnell conduct a Potemkin impeachment trial [Washington Post]
Elie Mystal is the Executive Editor of Above the Law and a contributor at The Nation. He can be reached @ElieNYC on Twitter, or at elie@abovethelaw.com. He will resist.
Sad news from Sidley. Over the weekend a first year associate unexpectedly passed away just a few months after starting full time at the firm.
Ralph C. Catalano joined Sidley in September 2019, where he worked in the Real Estate group in the New York office after previously working as a summer associate. Catalano got his undergraduate degree from the College of William and Mary and his J.D. from the University of Virginia School of Law.
According to an email sent to New York employees, Samir Gandhi, managing partner of the New York office, remembered Catalano as “a conscientious worker, valued member of the team and liked by everyone who knew him.”
The firm is making counselors available to employees, and they are encouraging folks to seek assistance in dealing with Catalano’s death.
Our thoughts go out to Catalano’s family, friends and colleagues at this difficult time.
Kathryn Rubino is a Senior Editor at Above the Law, and host of The Jabot podcast. AtL tipsters are the best, so please connect with her. Feel free to email her with any tips, questions, or comments and follow her on Twitter (@Kathryn1).
Black queens reign
Africa has the Miss Universe crown and all forms of social media have exploded. The first ever black African Miss Universe was only crowned in 1999, Botswana’s Mpule Kwelagobe, 47 years after the inception of the global pageant – so you can understand the African furore over the newly crowned beauty queen (Trinidad and Tobago’s Janelle Commissiong was crowned Miss Universe 1977 and in the process became the first black woman to win the prestigious pageant crown). Zozibini Tunzi, who only four months ago sashayed off the stage of Sun Arena, Pretoria, with the Miss South Africa crown, beat 89 other participants to become the world’s most beautiful woman. In fact, Tunzi’s victory is not the only reason for people of African origin to celebrate. Did you know that this is the only year in which the Miss America, Miss USA and Miss Teen USA crowns are currently on the heads of black women? When Eastern Cape’s own Zozibini won Miss Universe, she joined the list of black women currently wearing the world’s most coveted tiaras. And even before she had recovered from jet lag, flying back home, Miss Jamaica – Toni-Ann Singh – joined the string of black queens with her victory at Miss World.
Despite the Miss Universe frenzy, I must say that I am a little annoyed. Not with Miss Universe herself – Good heavens, no! The reason for my irritation is the millions of terabytes of hypocrisy currently infesting my Facebook and Twitter newsfeed.
Miss Universe brings out opportunists
Most men who have access to a computer or smart phone spend hours watching or porn. It’s the Y chromosome, I guess. But guess who is the exception to this rule? Yours truly of course – insert Afro haired smirk emoji. I use up most of my data bundles on natural hair. I spend hours on Pinterest, looking at luscious black coils, more hours, cruising for corkscrew-haired black faces, and even more of my online time salivating over Afros, cornrows and dreadlocks on Twitter.
Why I am annoyed about Miss Universe
When I discover a lovely restaurant – here I use the word “discover” in that Livingstonian way, you know, Europeans discovering rivers and mountains in Africa – it becomes my restaurant. Even though I may have zero equity in the establishment and the waiters may, from time to time, serve my café latte a few degrees colder than ideal temperature, I still consider the restaurant “my own.” In fact, once I declare a restaurant “mine,” I get annoyed at people – these Johnny Come Latelies – who try to appropriate my personal find. While we are on the subject, I also discovered André Ayew – son of legendary Ghanaian footballer, Abedi “Pele” Ayew – even before he became a Black Star and got mugged for a place in the semi finals by Luis Suarez at World Cup 2010. I got really annoyed with people who claimed Ayew as “their own.” I discovered him, damn it – Insert angry Afro haired emoji.
As a blogger, I made my bones writing what was at the time perceived as a seditious newspaper column, in which former Zimbabwean President Robert Mugabe was scripted as the villain even though Africa held him up as a hero at the time. Many of my fellow writers steered clear of politics, preferring to write about “safe” subject matter. But as Mugabe’s crown began to fall off his grey head, the same “safe” topic writers rushed to the internet to hashtag #MugabeHasFallen. This annoyed me to no end. The glory stealers. And yes, I am that petty.
African-American woman with natural hair. Photo: Wiki commons/www.nappy.co/license/)
Suddenly everyone loves African natural hair?
For years, I and a handful of naturalistas have been speaking to ourselves, like crazy street preachers, because nobody else will listen when we hashtag #OurHairIsBeautiful. In fact, many people outside the African natural hair movement despise naturalistas, believing them to be snobby and narrow-minded. But when a girl with short-short kinks placed the Miss Universe crown on her head, suddenly everyone wants to praise natural African hair. Where were they when we were hashtagging #ForTheLoveOfAfros and #OurHairIsBeautiful and #TeamNaturalHair? Where were they when I spent gigs and gigs of data looking at natural African hair? And you know what really-really-really scratches my eyes like sandpaper? It’s the fact that people with horse hair and plastic bristles on their heads are piggy-backing on Zozibini Tunzi’s global fame. Get your own Miss Universe, damn it! After winning 200 likes and 99 retweets, the same people who filled my newsfeed with natural hair praise this week will be back on Amazon and Alibaba, ordering a fresh batch of synthetic hair. And this is why I am pissed off.
Come to think of it, there is nothing really shocking about a black, natural haired Miss Universe. All Zozibini Tunzi did was wear her hair the way God intended it to grow out of her scalp – insert Afro haired shrug emoji.
Angry but proud black man
When I am not making angry faces at people who only this week discovered the beauty of natural hair, I am filled with pride.
I grew up in a world where a woman who looks like me, with my kind of skin and my kind of hair, was never considered to be beautiful – I think that it is time that that stops today – Zozibini Tunzi.
I did grow up in a neighbourhood where the pong of heat combs fizzing through black hair filled the Sunday morning sky as women dressed up for Church. I did grow up in a country where natural African hair was called “mufushwa” – sundried vegetables. Ashamedly, I will admit that I grew up around sisters and girl cousins who played with blonde haired dolls despite their ebony skin. Even though I am a sometimes very petty natural African hair devotee, I understand and celebrate the meaning of Zozibini Tunzi’s Miss Universe Victory.
My pen is capped
Ed. note: This is the latest installment in a series of posts on motherhood in the legal profession, in partnership with our friends at MothersEsquire. Welcome Chelsie Lamie to our pages.
It’s 8:50 a.m. and I’m running late to take the kids to school. I’m only one minute away but I’m stuck on a one-lane dirt road in the jungle outside of Playa del Carmen, Mexico. A local farmer’s bulls have gotten out of their pen (again) and are blocking my way. Thankfully, one of the farmhands sees me through the trees and zooms out on his motorbike. He quickly clears the road and I am on my way again.
After dropping the kids off, I head back to our home to prepare for my 11:00 a.m. telephonic hearing. I watch the waves of the ocean as I enjoy the watermelon juice and fruit cup that I picked up from a vendor on the highway (for only 3 USD). The hearing goes well. I can’t help but smile when my motions are granted while I’m wearing a swimsuit, thousands of miles away from the courthouse. I head up to the rooftop and practice my Spanish with a family visiting from Columbia while I get in a quick swim.
Later on in the afternoon, I have my weekly telephone call with my office manager to discuss the week’s financials before picking up the kids and taking them to soccer practice. After soccer, we try a new restaurant for dinner (for a total of 25 USD for a family of four). We walk home from dinner, tuck the kids into bed, and I take an hour to respond to emails and answer my team members’ questions through our case management software.
Thanks to a great team of employees, years of building systems with integrated forms, and a decade of marketing, I have found the sweet spot. I truly believe I have attained the best work-life balance that is possible for me and my practice area. If you would have told me I would be living and working this way, just three years ago, I would have laughed out loud. I had always been a big believer in lawyers having a brick-and-mortar space. I thought clients expected it and would flee if I went virtual. But I started tracking the data in 2016 and noticed that over 80 percent of my clients never stepped foot in my office. They hired me based on personal recommendations from other attorneys or past/current clients. They didn’t need to see me or my space in person. My client base was getting younger, more tech savvy, and simply preferred to do business over the internet. Based on my review of the data, in 2018 I did what I had previously considered unthinkable: I took my five-employee, mid-six-figure law firm virtual. I closed my brick-and-mortar space and quickly grew my business into a seven-figure law firm in less than nine months.
My clients have access to me through telephone calls, Zoom video calls, email, and of course, in-person meetings when I come back one week each month to attend depositions, hearings, and mediations. I won’t lie, I call that one week “hell week” for a reason. My days start at 7 a.m. and ends almost at midnight. But it’s only seven days out of each month and to me, it’s worth it.
From a business perspective, going virtual freed up over $5,000.00 per month in our law firm budget (no more rent, electric bill, alarm system monitoring, office snacks, etc.). But the most important and valuable change I’ve seen is in my personal life. I’m more connected to my husband and kids than ever before. Three weeks out of the month, I drive them to and from school and soccer practice and tuck them in each night. We are living a healthier lifestyle, walking everywhere we can, eating more fresh fruits and vegetables, and spending our weekends immersed in nature. We spend our nights and weekends swimming in cenotes, floating through underground rivers, snorkeling with sea turtles in the ocean, combing the beach for shells, exploring ancient ruins, and visiting different cities across Mexico. From the beautiful cobblestone colonial city of San Miguel de Allende to the peaceful translucent lake of Bacalar near the Belize border, Mexico has so much to offer. Our kids don’t have time for tablets and video games — they’re too busy identifying the bugs, lizards, snakes, spiders, and birds in the jungles that surround our magical city. They’re learning a new language and absorbing a culture that puts family and community ahead of material possessions and competition.
I hope that my story has inspired you to consider transforming your brick-and-mortar law firm into a virtual one. You can certainly do so without moving your family thousands of miles away to a different country. But once you are virtual, the opportunity to at least travel more is a fantastic one and I hope that you take advantage of it.
Earlier: Mothers At Law: Achieving Meaningful Success In The Legal Profession
After 11 years of practicing law in a brick and mortar firm, Chelsie M. Lamie, a personal injury attorney, moved her family to Mexico and took her six-person law firm virtual in 2018. She returns to the Tampa Bay area one week every month to meet with her clients, and to attend depositions, mediations, hearings, and trials. Chelsie is a 2002 graduate of the University of Tampa and a 2007 graduate of Stetson University College of Law. Prior to attending law school, Chelsie was employed by an international insurance carrier as a bodily injury and general liability claims adjuster. Chelsie has been married to her husband, David, for 18 years, and they have two fantastic boys, five-year-old Michael and three-year-old Henry. Chelsie and her husband are certified scuba divers and travel enthusiast. Chelsie and her family have visited 60 countries and are working towards visiting the remaining 130+ in the next 15 years.
As we have discussed, investing in Renaissance Technologies hedge funds—and one of them in particular—is among the greatest perks to working at Renaissance Technologies, more than enough to compensate for the unpleasant odors emanating from the corner offices. And as we’ve also discussed, once of the ways RenTech makes it so is with a little creative prime broking and tax accounting.
There’s another way that RenTech makes things even better for those employees, and that’s by combining its can’t-miss hedge funds and its adeptness with the tax code to make them even more money. Specifically, it allows them to invest in those hedge funds through 401(k) and IRA plans fee-free. Alas, once again, the IRS is not amused.
Last week, Renaissance sent a letter to its current and former employees warning that the Internal Revenue Service could force them to pay back taxes and penalties… The letter, reviewed by The Wall Street Journal, said Renaissance now believes the IRS could determine that the foregone fees should be counted as taxable income and as contributions beyond the annual limits to retirement plans…. The Medallion fund, which is only available to employees, charges hefty annual management fees of 5% of all assets and as much as 44% of all of the fund’s gains, suggesting that the foregone fees could be substantial.
Renaissance Employees Could Face Clawbacks Over Hedge Fund’s Tax Maneuver [WSJ]
This firm may only be in year 2 of its existence, but that doesn’t mean they aren’t ready to shower their associates with big ol’ bonuses.
Today Selendy & Gay announced their median bonuses for associates. And, yeah, associates there are making bigger bonuses than the Biglaw market bonuses. Selendy’s scale is as follows:
These are the median bonus amounts for associates who have been with the Firm for a full year:
Class of 2012
$177,609
Class of 2013
$136,088
Class of 2014
$132,264
Class of 2015
$98,707
Class of 2016
$80,731
Class of 2017
$34,125
Class of 2018
$20,950
Managing partner Jennifer Selendy said the bonuses were the result of a great year for the firm:
“This has been an extraordinary year. We scored significant victories for our clients, filed innovative new cases, and made a real public impact. None of this would have been possible without our wonderful associates.”
Remember — we can’t do this without you, dear readers! We depend on your tips to stay on top of important bonus updates, so when your firm matches, please text us (646-820-8477) or email us (subject line: “[Firm Name] Matches”). Please include the memo if available. You can take a photo of the memo and send it via text or email if you don’t want to forward the original PDF or Word file.
And if you’d like to sign up for ATL’s Bonus Alerts (which is the alert list we also use for all salary announcements), please scroll down and enter your email address in the box below this post. If you previously signed up for the bonus alerts, you don’t need to do anything. You’ll receive an email notification within minutes of each bonus announcement that we publish. Thanks for your help!
Kathryn Rubino is a Senior Editor at Above the Law, and host of The Jabot podcast. AtL tipsters are the best, so please connect with her. Feel free to email her with any tips, questions, or comments and follow her on Twitter (@Kathryn1).
We don’t know much about working at cloud-computing company Palo Alto Networks. We do know that it is based in Silicon Valley (in spite of the name, Santa Clara), and so is probably infused with some degree of the ethos of that place (matcha bars, overuse of the word “disruption,” etc.), and also that the traffic is terrible. We’re sure that, regardless of its leadership’s belief that it is different and special and unique as a snowflake, as are all the other unicorns striding about the Valley, it also shares many of the discontents of every other white-collar job in America: office birthday parties, loud receptionists in adjoining cubicles, malfunctioning office equipment, a multiplicity of bosses whose own precise roles are unclear but who are constantly demanding some sort of accountability in the form of reports, Bobs from McKinsey prowling the halls asking, “What is it that you do here?” In short, we don’t know how closely Palo Alto Networks resembles Initech, the fictional software company from the movie Office Space, but we’re sure it resembles it to some extent. Even more so now that Peter, Michael and Samir, er, Janardhan, Sivannarayana, Ganapathi, Saber and Prasad have cooked up a little scheme to earn their way out of Palo Alto and possibly into a federal pound-me-in-the-ass prison.
According to the SEC’s complaint, Janardhan Nellore, a former IT administrator then at Palo Alto Networks Inc., was at the center of the trading ring, using his IT credentials and work contacts to obtain highly confidential information about his employer’s quarterly earnings and financial performance. As alleged in the complaint, until he was terminated earlier this year, Nellore traded Palo Alto Networks securities based on the confidential information or tipped his friends, Sivannarayana Barama, Ganapathi Kunadharaju, Saber Hussain, and Prasad Malempati, who also traded.
The SEC’s complaint alleges that the defendants sought to evade detection, with Nellore insisting that the ring use the code word “baby” in texts and emails to refer to his employer’s stock, and advising they “exit baby,” or “enter few baby.”
Excellent, a new word to add to the already bursting lexicon of completely transparent euphemisms for insider trading. For that, we’re glad the guys didn’t get around to burning the place down before we learned of it. They, however, probably wish they were cleaning the smoldering ruins today, rather than dealing with this.
The SEC’s complaint, filed in the Northern District of California, charges Nellore, Barama, Kunadharaju, Hussain, and Malempati with fraud and seeks permanent injunctions, disgorgement with prejudgment interest, and penalties.
The U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Northern District of California today announced criminal charges against Nellore and Barama.
Silicon Valley IT Administrator and Friends Charged in Multimillion Dollar Insider Trading Ring [SEC]
Former Palo Alto Networks IT admin charged for running insider trading ring [ZDNet]