Individuals Paid 8 Times More Total Tax Than Corporations Thanks To Trump Tax Cut Loopholes

A new report from the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy has been getting a lot of attention. The report found that for 2018, the first year in which Trump’s signature Tax Cuts and Jobs Act was in effect, 91 profitable Fortune 500 companies paid no income taxes at all. None. Furthermore, across all 379 of the profitable Fortune 500 companies, the average effective tax rate was only 11.3 percent.

The low corporate tax rate, or absence of a corporate tax rate for 91 of those large companies, was in part due to the fact that Trump’s tax law lowered the overall corporate tax rate (for larger companies, at least). Previously, the corporate tax rate was based on a tiered structure in which the largest and most profitable companies paid higher rates than smaller, less profitable companies. Under the structure that predated Trump’s tax law, companies paid just 15 percent on their first $50,000 of income, and the corporate income tax rate increased from there, up to the highest rate bracket at 39 percent. Trump’s tax law set a flat 21 percent corporate tax rate, increasing the taxes paid by the smallest companies and decreasing the taxes paid by all the higher-earning corporations.

Of course, lowering the overall corporate tax rate to 21 percent does not explain how so many very large and very profitable companies got to 11.3 percent, or to zero percent. Turns out Trump’s corporate tax rate is a flat tax only in the sense that a slice of Swiss cheese is flat. While the rate doesn’t go above 21 percent, it is riddled with loopholes inserted by corporate lobbyists. These loopholes — “tax breaks” as they are more diplomatically referred to in the ITEP report — allow companies with savvy lawyers and lobbyists to avoid taxes by writing off more for a variety of things, from luxury automobiles to bicycle commuting reimbursements. According to the ITEP, had the 379 profitable Fortune 500 companies actually paid the full 21 percent rate without taking advantage of loopholes, they would have collectively paid income taxes totaling $161 billion for 2018, rather than the $86.8 billion they actually paid. The savings corporations realized by building the loopholes into Trump’s tax law appear to have been well worth the $6 billion spent annually on lobbying. (In addition to lobbying, corporations also spend directly on federal elections, to the tune of $2.6 billion in 2018.)

Tax Cuts And Jobs Act Increased Amount Paid By Humans, Decreased Amount Paid By Corporations

The relative tax rates of corporations and individuals are interesting, and relevant. But examining the rates for individuals versus corporations is not necessarily an apples-to-apples comparison. The raw amount of total tax dollars collected might give a more complete basis for comparison, and looking at that total, the systemic corporate tax dodge that is the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act can clearly be seen as coming at the expense of all the rest of us (actual people).

The Office of Management and Budget publishes an annual summary of federal government receipts by source going all the way back to 1934. For 2018, the federal government took in a total of $204.733 billion in income taxes from corporations — no small sum. Yet, it pales in comparison to the amount of income taxes collected from flesh-and-blood human beings: $1,683.538 billion. In 2018, you and I and all of our friends and relatives collectively paid more than eight times the total U.S. income tax paid by all the Targets and Walmarts and Raytheons of the world.

The year before Trump’s tax law went into effect, we humans paid a lot less, while corporations paid a lot more. In 2017, human beings paid $1,587.12 billion in income tax. Corporations paid $297.048 billion. We bloodbags still paid a lot more than the moneymaking business entities, but it was only about five times more instead of the eight times more we are now paying.

The total amount of income tax paid, by corporations and by people, has fluctuated over the years. In modern times, corporations have always paid a bit less overall than what is paid by actual people. You have to go back to 1943, when people paid $6.505 billion in income taxes and corporations paid $9.557 billion, to find a year when business entities with a core function of making money paid more income tax than biological entities with a core function of staying alive. So, I guess we’ve more or less settled on the status quo being that corporations contribute somewhat less than people to income tax receipts.

But it sure seems like corporations should be footing a little more than an eighth of what we’re all paying. And anyone who says Trump’s Tax Cuts and Jobs Act was anything more than a corporate giveaway at the expense of human taxpayers hasn’t spent the time that I have going through OMB spreadsheets.


Jonathan Wolf is a litigation associate at a midsize, full-service Minnesota firm. He also teaches as an adjunct writing professor at Mitchell Hamline School of Law, has written for a wide variety of publications, and makes it both his business and his pleasure to be financially and scientifically literate. Any views he expresses are probably pure gold, but are nonetheless solely his own and should not be attributed to any organization with which he is affiliated. He wouldn’t want to share the credit anyway. He can be reached at jon_wolf@hotmail.com.

Have We Entered An Age Of Partisan Judges?

Good tidings and joy!  Time with family!  And no one reading Above the Law. (Hi, Mom!)

This gives me my annual opportunity to veer a little off-topic with my column.

Consider judicial partisanship. I was recently reading some articles about the hyper-partisan cases making their way through the court system — cases involving the various subpoenas seeking President Trump’s tax returns, legislative attempts to obtain Trump’s tax returns, the Emoluments Clause, funds to build “the wall,” that sort of thing.

As I was reading those articles, I was struck each time by a desire to know who had appointed the judge (or judges) involved in the case. Were the judges Reagan appointees? Bush I or II? Clinton? Obama? Trump?

Somehow, a Trump (or Trump administration) loss before an Obama appointee seemed less significant than a Trump (or Trump administration) loss before a Trump appointee.

If the articles didn’t tell me who had appointed the judges, then I thought a relevant point had been omitted: Surely this mattered, and shame on the reporter who had failed to provide the information.

Then I realized that this was the first time in my life that I’ve thought that the identity of the president who appointed the judge was relevant to a judicial decision.

In the past, I was certainly aware of the implications of who had appointed judges. Republican judges were generally seen as more pro-business, for example, and Democrats as more pro-consumer. But I never thought that an article describing a case had omitted a relevant fact if it hadn’t disclosed the identity of the appointing president.

In some of today’s cases, I do.

That’s a disaster.

I’m a pretty firm believer that, although judges are inevitably shaped by their life experiences, judges can cast aside their party affiliations when they don their robes. A serious person can focus on the facts of a case and ignore its political implications.

If even I — a believer in judges’ ability to remain neutral — am now keenly interested in the political affiliation of a deciding judge, then something has changed in society.

I suppose there are three possibilities: First, some of today’s cases may be more fiercely partisan than the cases that I’m remembering from my past.  Many cases — business disputes, breaches of contract, and the like — involve no partisanship at all. Some cases — criminal cases, civil rights disputes, and so on — might involve partisanship at a very general level. Even politicized cases — abortion, gay rights, the death penalty — don’t seem to involve as pointed partisanship as today’s cases involving Trump, on the one hand, and Democrats, on the other.

Maybe I’m right to care about the identity of the judge in today’s cases, just as I was right not to care in the past.

Second, maybe I’m simply forgetting some past cases in which I was deeply interested in who had appointed the presiding judge — maybe some Clinton-era cases that seemed partisan? If I’m finding political meaning in what is actually a failure of recall, then society is safe.

Third, maybe although I’m curious about who appointed judges, that curiosity is misplaced. Although I personally am now interested in who appointed judges, a sensible person wouldn’t be; it really doesn’t matter.

Still, the fact that I’ve developed this interest disturbs me.

Something has prompted this: The nature of the disputes; the press coverage; divisions within society; something.

If others, like me, are developing a feeling that judicial party affiliation matters more today than it did in the past, then the judiciary is losing a form of societal respect that we may be sorry to see interred.

Despite that, enjoy the holiday season!


Mark Herrmann is the Chief Counsel – Litigation and Global Chief Compliance Officer at Aon, the world’s leading provider of risk management services, insurance and reinsurance brokerage, and human capital and management consulting. He is the author of The Curmudgeon’s Guide to Practicing Law and Inside Straight: Advice About Lawyering, In-House And Out, That Only The Internet Could Provide (affiliate links). You can reach him by email at inhouse@abovethelaw.com.

Biglaw Firm Wows With New Parental Leave Policy For All Employees

2019 was the year that expanded parental leave became a real trend in Biglaw. But just because the year is closing doesn’t mean parental leave is done having its moment in the sun. Just last week, another Biglaw firm announced an expanded policy — effective in 2020 — that’s applicable to all of its employees.

Biglaw firms should now know they need to offer some pretty good parental policies in order to stay competitive with their peer firms. We are seeing more and more firms offering their attorneys generous paid leave, and the programs are increasingly gender neutral and offered without a primary caregiver stipulation.

The latest firm to offer improved parental leave is Sheppard Mullin. As their announcement notes, the new policy is designed to take the needs of all employees into account:

We are pleased to announce the Firm will be enhancing our parental baby bonding leave policy to support our SMRH employees (qualified attorneys and professional staff) as their families grow.  We recognize that every family is different.  We want our parental baby bonding leave policy to reflect the needs of each employee.

The highlights of the new policy include:

  • All new parents can take up to 12 weeks of paid parental baby bonding leave for the birth, adoption or foster care placement of a child.

  • Birth mothers will receive an additional 6-8 weeks paid disability leave for childbirth recovery depending on the period of actual disability.

  • Paid bonding leave must be initiated within the first six months of the birth, adoption or foster care placement and completed within the first year.

  • Ramp Time:  Attorneys and paraprofessional timekeepers planning for a parental leave that is eight continuous weeks or longer, will have a reduced hours expectation of 60% of his or her full time equivalent (FTE) during a ramp down and ramp up period of 6 weeks before and post leave.  This ramp up/ramp down will have no negative impact on a potential hours-based bonus.

The firm also circulated a list of best practices for taking leave to ensure that employees that take leave are put in the best possible position:

  • Communication is key!  Partners and supervisors are encouraged to speak to the attorney or professional about their expected departure and return date.

  • Those planning to go on leave should provide a status report and project list to their supervisors.

  • TM/HR will send regular notice of pending and current leave dates, and expected return dates to Practice Group Leaders, Office Managing Partners, Office Administrators and/or Chiefs.

  • As this is a leave of absence, no work should be given to the attorney/employee.  If there are extenuating circumstances, the supervisor should first speak with the PGLs or Chief to see if there is additional coverage, then with the CHRO, and finally with the attorney/employee.

Folks at the firm seem very pleased with the change. From a tipster:

Sheppard Mullin continues to make itself a premier place to be an associate. It’s amazing how much effort they put into listening to associates and actually implementing feedback.

Kudos to the firm!


headshotKathryn Rubino is a Senior Editor at Above the Law, and host of The Jabot podcast. AtL tipsters are the best, so please connect with her. Feel free to email her with any tips, questions, or comments and follow her on Twitter (@Kathryn1).

Malaysia Will Settle For Either $8 Billion Or Goldman’s Entire Asia Leadership Team In Jail

Discontent With Firm’s Opaque Bonus Model

Historically, Haynes and Boone has come in all over the map when it comes to bonuses. It’s another firm with a black box bonus structure that leaves associates scrambling to figure out exactly why they’ve made what they’ve made in any given year. So far, the tips we’ve received are mostly negative — with associates complaining that the arcane formula the firm uses shortchanges folks at more senior levels. That said, if precedent is any guide, Above the Law will shortly receive a tip from an associate earning a full market bonus under the formula. How does a firm end up with such a spread? One tipster has a theory.

For the record, if it even needs repeating, black box bonuses are rarely good news for associates. In the best of cases it’s used to obscure downward trend line in compensation. In the worst of cases it’s used to atomize the work force and conceal arbitrary or discriminatory pay practices. It’s just a killer for firm morale to have everyone looking over their shoulder wondering if they’re getting paid what they deserve. And sometimes, this leads to associates trying to reverse engineer the formula to square bonuses with their friends.

One associate who admits to not having fully cracked the code claims to have worked out one insight:

They seem to have taken on an “Eat-what-you-kill” standard for associates. So if you do work for a client with low negotiated rates you are going to be compensated less than someone doing the same work for another client that pays more for the same work.

There’s a certain appeal to the eat what you kill model. After all, you can end up on top of the world with a cut of a multimillion dollar payday. But you can also find yourself turning out your pockets because you’ve been working on low paying matters for a practice group that simply gets paid at lower rates.  Making these associates functionally second-class citizens isn’t only unfair, it can actually undermine a firm’s shared mission with associates avoiding partners offering lower rate work. Sure, sometimes the partners with lower rate work are poor fits for the firm, but just as often those partners are doing work servicing clients who bring in bigger paydays for other practice groups. That work needs to be handled without associates ducking it to preserve their bonuses.

In any event, Haynes & Boone folks should let us know (anonymously of course) what they’re getting so we can test out this theory. Good luck to everyone out there.

Please help us help you when it comes to bonus news at other firms. As soon as your firm’s bonus memo comes out, please email it to us (subject line: “[Firm Name] Bonus”) or text us (646-820-8477). Please include the memo if available. You can take a photo of the memo and send it via text or email if you don’t want to forward the original PDF or Word file.

And if you’d like to sign up for ATL’s Bonus Alerts, please scroll down and enter your email address in the box below this post. If you previously signed up for the bonus alerts, you don’t need to do anything. You’ll receive an email notification within minutes of each bonus announcement that we publish.


HeadshotJoe Patrice is a senior editor at Above the Law and co-host of Thinking Like A Lawyer. Feel free to email any tips, questions, or comments. Follow him on Twitter if you’re interested in law, politics, and a healthy dose of college sports news. Joe also serves as a Managing Director at RPN Executive Search.

The Lawyer Holiday Gift Guide: The Best Gifts For The Attorney In Your Life

The holiday season is upon us, and yet again, you have no idea what to get for the fickle lawyer or law student in your life. We’re here to help.

We’ve got an eclectic selection of fantastic legally themed holiday gifts for you to choose from, so settle in by that stack of documents yet to be reviewed and dig in.

We have so many offerings this year that we’ve categorized everything so you can either peruse the whole post or click on the link below to jump directly to the category that you think best suits your shopping mission:

Books
Apparel & Accessories
Games
Food & Drink
Desk Toys & Office Decor
Movies & Television
Luggage

(Disclosure: When available, we have used affiliate links.)

Books

Do you have a reader on your hands? Of course you do, you’re buying for an attorney! Grab a nice book to curl up with this holiday season — or to read on their next flight to some far-flung deposition.

Former Acting SG and current Hogan Lovells litigator Neal Katyal (with Sam Koppelman) just released Impeach: The Case Against Donald Trump, a straightforward account of the mounting evidence against the president. You can check out an ATL interview with Katyal about the book here.

My Mom, The Lawyer is a children’s book from Michelle Browning Coughlin, founder of MothersEsquire, a nonprofit organization devoted to gender equity in the legal profession. All proceeds benefit MothersEsquire in its mission.

With the movie set to be released this month, this is a good time to check out Just Mercy, Bryan Stevenson’s 2015 account of the Walter McMillian case. I’m not sure “spoilers” applies to non-fiction, but if you’re buying for the type that wants to see the movie cold, just get the book and they can read it later. Speaking of movies, Dark Waters with Mark Ruffalo is already out, and you can read all about that legal battle against DuPont in Exposure.

You’d think a lawyer wouldn’t need a book like this, but then you hear the positions the SG’s office is willing to take these days and realize everyone could use a refresher, like How To Read The Constitution and Why by CBS Legal Analyst Kim Wehle. Eric Foner also has a historical look at The Second Founding charting the effort to remake the Republic.

Finally, two entries charting the epic failures of the system and the delinquent efforts to right the ship. Rachel Denhollander’s What Is A Girl Worth? discusses her role in breaking the silence surrounding USA Gymnastics and its years of covering for Larry Nassar. Ronan Farrow covers some of the same ground in Catch & Kill: Lies, Spies, and the Conspiracy To Protect Predators

apparel & accessories

RBG has gotten the Goddess Coin treatment over at Awe Inspired. Dissent Pins also sells a line of pins and necklaces in honor of the justice and Etsy offers some cute Supreme Court pins as well.

ESK Esq. has a whole line of apparel for the lawyer out there including a stylized view of glorious Blackacre of Property Law fame and an International Shoe logo for Civ Pro nerds. If you’re buying for a law student this season, consider this Lawyer-Loading shirt or this shirt featuring the refrain of law students everywhere.

Here’s a shirt for every good Sunny fan who knows the benefit of a solid education in Bird Law. Here’s a Nelson & Murdock shirt for the comic book set — I’m still searching for a Goodman, Lieber, Kurtzberg & Holliway shirt for the fan that wants to be really obscure.

There’s even a shirt for the office holiday party.

Here’s a Legal Pad Bow Tie. Is the lawyer in your life a nerd or a complete nerd? Because if it’s the latter, then you absolutely have to buy this legal pad bow tie, the perfect sartorial statement against the kids and their damn computer note-taking.

What better stocking stuffer than… stockings.

Games

Looking for a diversion from billable hours?

The LAWSUIT! board game makes a fantastic holiday gift for clients, lawyers, friends, and family. The game’s setting is the day-to-day operation of a law firm where players bring fictitious lawsuits with whimsical premises, and can elect to settle or appeal cases.

Makers of the official chess set of the Supreme Court Historical Society! Approach the Bench makes great gifts for attorneys, law students, or anyone in the legal profession. They offer courtroom-themed chess sets, Judge, Blind Justice, and Attorney bottle stoppers, ornaments, and lawyer, Judge, and Blind Justice chocolate bars!

FOOD & DRINK

This wine bottle holder is so delightfully weird that it comes all the way back around into awesome. There’s some serious detail work on this thing.

Or for the more honest out there, we have this World’s Okayest Lawyer Mug.

What better way to get into the holiday spirit than to enjoy some holiday spirits? Caskers, founded by Harvard Law grads, curates all varieties of the best craft spirits from around the world and offers discounts of up to 40% of retail prices.

‘The Foodie’ via Teak & Twine

Teak & Twine offers gift boxes for all people and occasions. While everything is customizable, here are a few suggestions for curated boxes that the folks there suggested:

  • For the attorney who has everything, The Tuxedo: Sophisticated and classic, this gift features elevated edibles.
  • For your top clients, The Foodie – The most mouth-watering of our gifts and our top corporate seller.
  • For the hardworking law studentThe Dream Job – A fine notebook and coffee: law school essentials!

Do we have puns? Sure! And another one. Even this stretch of one.

Chocolate Text lets you send chocolate messages to anyone you desire. Personally, I’d go for “You’ve Been Served.” You can also order a “Selfie Tin.” Simply upload a picture and Chocolate Text places it on a tin of your choice of sweet treats. The perfect place for that photo of your favorite lawyer shaking hands with a Supreme Court justice or walking up to get their degree.

Is a lawyer having a good day or a bad day? This wine glass will let everyone know. Meanwhile this wine glass explains why the lawyer is drinking today.

Finally, a Zazzle user has a take on the ubiquitous “Keep Calm” motif, with these “Keep Calm and Call A Lawyer” candy jars.

Desk Toys & Office Decor

Lawyers spend most of their lives behind their desks, so why not spice them up a little? Sure they might appreciate a framed picture of their loved ones, but these thoughtful trinkets might make for better conversation pieces.

This is a cute business card holder of a female lawyer sitting at her desk — making it very meta. This glass card holder can be personalized.

And then there are Funko Pops. You know, those big head toys that seem to be everywhere these days. They even make Golden Girls Funko Pops now, which seems like the border of market saturation. But there are some legal Pops out there like this one of Matt Murdock or this lawyer She-Hulk one. There’s a Citadel-dwelling Lawyer Morty from Rick and Morty. And, obviously, there’s Saul Goodman and Jimmy McGill. For that matter, Abraham Lincoln was a lawyer.

It’s not exactly meant for the desk, but this is a nice decorative touch for the office. It’s a framed copy of the patent artwork for the gavel. Specifically, U.S. Patent 2,755,833 — also known as the Hollow-Headed Gavel With Telescopic Handle Section.

Someone at CafePress has a billable hours clock available to mix decor with some wit.

movies & Television

Lawyers may not have a lot of free time, but when they have a chance to catch up with the world, they can thank you for providing them something fantastic for their viewing pleasure.

Like the complete series of Law & Order. If you wanted to know what twenty season bundle of disks looks like, well there you go.

Speaking of series, the complete runs of Perry Mason, Matlock, and Ally McBeal are all available. Personally, I’d take the various seasons of Harvey Bridman or Better Call Saul though.

There was a stellar RBG documentary last year that you can pick up. We reviewed the film here.

Classical movie buffs might appreciate this 50th Anniversary Edition of 12 Angry Men or an opportunity to revisit Atticus Finch before he became a racist in Go Set A Watchman. On the ridiculous side, perhaps they’d enjoy Al Pacino’s turn as Satan in Devil’s Advocate. Then there’s the greatest courtroom film of all time, My Cousin Vinny.

Luggage


The essential gift for a traveling lawyer! The ScanFast Briefcase from Mobile Edge is a TSA-compliant laptop bag that allows the traveler to keep their laptop inside their bag while passing through TSA security checkpoints. This makes traveling with your laptop simple while keeping your laptop secure.

Mobile_Edge_MESFEBX_ScanFast_Element_Checkpoint_Friendly_829071

For a less standard design, check out this option (which also comes in three other color combinations). The bag is still TSA-compliant and boasts rich pink suede and brown faux-leather exterior highlighted by a bright color-accented satin lining. A matching shoulder strap, separate zippered workstation for files, and a trolley strap for rolling luggage included. Carries a Lifetime Warranty!

Seriously, peruse all of the MobileEdge offerings while shopping.

If you come across any more cool holiday gift ideas for attorneys, send them our way! We’re always looking to add more to the annual guide.


HeadshotJoe Patrice is a senior editor at Above the Law and co-host of Thinking Like A Lawyer. Feel free to email any tips, questions, or comments. Follow him on Twitter if you’re interested in law, politics, and a healthy dose of college sports news. Joe also serves as a Managing Director at RPN Executive Search.

SEC Just Wondering How Citadel Made Slack Look So Damned Good For Its IPO

Something’s Coming … Something Good: The Revival Of ‘West Side Story’ Gets Gang Life Right

(Photo by Jose CABEZAS/AFP/Getty Images)

For many young men in urban areas, especially immigrant teens who don’t speak the dominant language, who are picked on in school, and whose parents work two jobs or still live in their home countries, gang membership provides a home away from home, protection, and a passage to manhood.

Most of the murder cases I’ve handled over the past five years have been gang related. From the infamous “Junior” case, where subsets of the same gang fell upon each other, to wars among neighborhood toughs fighting over the block’s marijuana trade — shooting, stabbing, and fighting is, unfortunately, how gangs function.

That’s why when I recently saw the revival of “West Side Story” in previews at the Broadway Theater, I was saddened to realize how little has changed in gang violence since the 1957 play was written. Sure, the Sharks and the Jets don’t exist, but today’s gangs, like the Bloods, Crips, MS13, Trinis, etc., still attract the same crowd -– bored, hostile, young men, roaming the streets
looking for power, kicks, and meaning in their lives.

Although I’ve seen “West Side Story” many times, this most recent version hits harder than any I’ve seen before. Gone is the light-hearted ballad, “I Feel Pretty,” the frilly costumes at the high school dance, and the humorous denseness of Officer Krupke. In their place is hard-core grit, open lust, violence, and police brutality.

The play begins with the Jets walking front and center, punked-out in tattoos and piercings, wife-beater tees and low-slung pants. It looks more like a line-up than a chorus line. The Sharks follow on stage, intermingling with the Jets in slow-motion, sizing up their enemies.

Each nuance of the actors’ steely glances is displayed along a huge wall at the back of the stage as a hand-held video camera sweeps slowly from face to face. The technique, used throughout the play, creates a multidimensional flux of space and time where anything could happen and does, from a sudden rainstorm to the back wall opening to reveal (and partially obscure) further sets within.

The effect at times is vertiginous. Dancers move in front of ever-shifting video of empty streets bordered by scaffolding, barren factories, and police staring down gun barrels at cuffed perps.

I wondered what Leonard Bernstein would have thought of this new, tougher, and less romanticized version.

Although not a lyric or note was changed, by updating the clothes, choreography, and gestures, and adding tattoos and piercings, even G-rated lyrics like “Officer Krupke, krup you!” didn’t seem out of place despite anachronisms like gang members taking selfies or filming police
encounters on cellphones.

It was leaner, faster-paced and more poignant than the original. This is no mere reworking of an old theme, but a hardening of its message: kids and racism run amok, where only a sacrifice -– the death of the kid looking to escape — brings people together.

Gang warfare in urban areas is as strong as ever. With waves of new immigrants, enhanced hostility toward them, insufficient money for public schools, and the ever-widening gap between rich and poor, I fear the tragedy of “West Side Story” will keep getting replayed long after this incarnation finishes its run.


Toni Messina has tried over 100 cases and has been practicing criminal law and immigration since 1990. You can follow her on Twitter: @tonitamess.

Morning Docket: 12.23.19

(Photo by Jabin Botsford/The Washington Post via Getty Images)

* Right now, one out of every four circuit judges in the United States is a Trump appointee. [Washington Post]

* Some scholars are arguing President Trump cannot be considered impeached until articles of impeachment are sent to the Senate. Legal experts make things so confusing. [Fox News]

*An Alabama judge has been arrested for stealing nearly $50,000, and he left a paper trail of about 70 checks proving his misdeeds. This judge should leave criminal acts to the professionals. [News Maven]

* A FISA court judge has ordered the Justice Department to turn over materials related to an F.B.I. lawyer connected with the Carter Page investigation. [New York Times]

* An attorney convicted of shooting a fellow club patron has been sentenced to prison. Wouldn’t want to be in court with this lawyer… [The Oklahoman]

* An NYC realtor is suing the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia for allegedly stiffing him on a hefty commission. [New York Post]


Jordan Rothman is a partner of The Rothman Law Firm, a full-service New York and New Jersey law firm. He is also the founder of Student Debt Diaries, a website discussing how he paid off his student loans. You can reach Jordan through email at jordan@rothmanlawyer.com.