Just Because Billing Rates Are Up Doesn’t Mean Bonuses Will Follow

(Image via Getty)

After Milbank matched last year’s holiday bonus schedule — “matched” assuming you ignore the summer bonuses from last year — we aggregated some of the best associate commentary about the new bonuses. One irritated tipster objected to the mundane bonuses by pointing out that the firm had raised rates this year and arguing that bonuses should have gone up accordingly and anything else is just profit taking by the partners off the backs of the associates:

They increased rates by 4% this year, so comp should go up, not down.

The next firms down the line should know they are going to get ravaged by the legal rags if they just match when the partners get millions while the workhorses don’t even get a cost of living increase.

I’m not so sure this tracks. In his reaction column, Elie Mystal argued that firms are gearing up for the next recession though he questioned whether any firm is going to stay its hand at layoff time based on cheaping out now. If partners are just pocketing the extra revenue, then the answer is emphatically no, they will not let this deter them from future layoffs.

But partners may not be pocketing this extra money. As we also covered yesterday, many Biglaw firms have been holding on to more revenue and adding it to partner capital contributions. In other words, that money could in fact be going into the rainy day fund that will keep the firm paying its bills — to both vendors and associates and staff — when times get tough.

There’s also an argument to be had that the salary hike last year — also initiated by Milbank — was a bridge too far under the existing finances. It’s not that the market couldn’t bear the increase, because obviously it could, but whether that increase was shouldered by decreasing partner profits or passing it on to the clients was an open question. You can guess how that was ultimately resolved. And despite the caterwauling of those clients, they continued to dutifully pay because the only thing worse than paying more for legal services is having to explain a devastating loss by admitting the legal department was trying to cut corners on counsel.

The retort to this is that if true, why were summer bonuses on the table last year and not this year? Remember Milbank wasn’t originally on the summer bonus train — that was Simpson’s contribution to the cause.

Finally, boosting rack rates doesn’t necessarily mean the firm’s billing out at that rate. Biglaw billing is wrought with discounts to make clients feel special. Is a 4 percent rate increase really bringing in 4 percent more scratch? Probably not. Milbank’s revenue is — if Am Law numbers are to be taken as gospel — up about 12 percent, but headcount is also up roughly 6 percent. And, of course, they raised the salaries in the meantime.

The point is, it’s possible that bumping rates should result in a bonus increase, but it’s certainly not automatic. There’s a little more involved in running a firm than that.

Earlier: Biglaw’s Reactions To Same-Bank Bonuses
Law Firms Trying Not To Go Bankrupt This Next Recession


HeadshotJoe Patrice is a senior editor at Above the Law and co-host of Thinking Like A Lawyer. Feel free to email any tips, questions, or comments. Follow him on Twitter if you’re interested in law, politics, and a healthy dose of college sports news. Joe also serves as a Managing Director at RPN Executive Search.

Morning Docket: 11.08.19

Gordon Caplan, left. (Photo by Jessica Rinaldi/The Boston Globe via Getty Images)

* A lawyer caught up in the college admissions scandal has had his law license suspended. Maybe he also helped his kid get into law school… [New York Post]

* The former top lawyer for a firm co-founded by Peter Thiel is suing her ex-employer for wrongful termination. [Los Angeles Times]

* Apparently there is a severe lawyer shortage in parts of Massachusetts, especially in Springfield. Looks like more lawyers looking for jobs should travel to the Commonwealth. [Mass Live]

* The San Francisco District Attorney race may be decided by only a few thousand votes. Never doubt that every vote counts. [San Francisco Chronicle]

* A lawyer who claimed he missed a hearing due to his grandfather’s death must supply proof to the court. This reminds me of an episode of Seinfeld… [ABA Journal]

* President Trump has paid $2M to settle a lawsuit filed by the New York Attorney General regarding the Trump Foundation. [CNN]


Jordan Rothman is a partner of The Rothman Law Firm, a full-service New York and New Jersey law firm. He is also the founder of Student Debt Diaries, a website discussing how he paid off his student loans. You can reach Jordan through email at jordan@rothmanlawyer.com.

Zimbabwe’s Civil Servants in Unprecedented Strike for Better Wages – The Zimbabwean

HARARE, Zimbabwe — Civil servants stung by Zimbabwe’s galloping inflation staged a one-day strike on Wednesday in a demand for increased wages, saying that their earnings were disappearing under skyrocketing prices.

Inflation in the southern African nation is running at about 300 percent, according to International Monetary Fund figures, and has prompted walkouts by doctors and nurses as well.

“We need increased salaries to be able to keep coming to work,” said Charles Mubwandarikwa, chairman of the Progressive Teachers Union of Zimbabwe, which joined the government workers’ strike in solidarity.

Zimbabwean doctors, many of whom have been on strike for about two months, are demanding that their wages not only be increased, but that they be paid in American dollars as a hedge against inflation.

The government fired 77 of the striking doctors this week, out of 1,680 total, accusing them of failing to show up for a disciplinary hearing before the country’s Health Service Board.

On Monday, nurses in local authority clinics in the capital, Harare, also walked off the job. The nurses said that they, too, were unable to work because of poor wages.

The government appeared acutely aware of the mounting crisis. On Tuesday, Monica Mutsvangwa, the minister of information, said at a news conference that “medical services at most central hospitals” remained limited because “the public hospitals medical doctors’ strike has now gone beyond 63 days.”

Over the past few months, the government has tried to appease workers by providing allowances to help meet the rising cost of living. But the measures were not enough to stop the board representing civil servants in Zimbabwe, the Apex Council, from calling Wednesday’s strike.

“Government workers are earning an equivalent of $40 or less, and so we appeal to the government to pay us better,” said a member of the council, Takavarasha Zhou.

The police had approved Wednesday’s strike, the first time a job action by government workers had been permitted. The authorities in general have taken a hard line against demonstrations: In August, with the backing of a court, the authorities banned demonstrations by members of opposition political parties and civil society organizations.

The striking workers on Wednesday sang and danced as they gathered outside the offices of the Apex Council. They waved placards with protest slogans directed at the government. Some clashes erupted between strikers and police forces.

The protesters had wanted to march to the offices of the Ministry of Finance, where they had intended to hand over a petition outlining their grievances. But heavily armed police officers blocked their movement.

“It’s like police gave us the right to march with their right hand, but quickly snatched it away with their left hand,” said Cecilia Alexander, the president of the Apex Council.

Since coming to power, President Emmerson Mnangagwa’s government has resorted to force to quell dissent.

In August 2018, after demonstrators in Zimbabwe’s capital called the country’s peaceful elections a sham and demanded the immediate release of the results in the July presidential poll, Mr. Mnangagwa’s government unleashed the army on protesters.

At least six people were killed in the clashes.

In January this year, Mr. Mnangagwa’s government again deployed the military when antigovernment protests broke out against a rise in fuel prices, leaving 17 people fatally shot in Harare and nearby towns.

Mr. Mnangagwa’s government has struggled to sell its open-for-business mantra to the developed world. In October, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo announced sanctions against the minister of state security, Owen Ncube, for “a gross violation of human rights in Zimbabwe.”

Even as Zimbabwe has tried to re-engage Washington, a diplomatic fallout between Zimbabwe and the United States has complicated matters.

The foreign affairs minister, Sibusiso Moyo, accused the United States ambassador to Zimbabwe, Brian Nicholson, of acting like a member of the country’s opposition. Mr. Moyo this month threatened to cut off diplomatic ties after Mr. Nicholson apparently suggested that corruption was behind the country’s economic malaise.

ZACC hits out at Gumbo witness claims, says minister subject of criminal investigation – The Zimbabwean

Transport and Infrastructural Development Minister Joram Gumbo

Gumbo’s lawyer, Selby Hwacha, misled journalists Wednesday claiming the minister had merely been invited to assist ZACC with information as a potential State witness.

Hwacha’s media pushback came after Gumbo was released under unclear circumstances Tuesday, despite having been scheduled to appear in court on corruption charges.

“He is an accused person not a witness,” ZACC chairperson Justice Loice Matanda-Moyo told journalists, directly contradicting Hwacha.

Gumbo on Monday became the second sitting minister to be snared by ZACC officers after he was arrested in connection with a US$1 million payment made to a relative’s bank account during his time as Transport minister (see charges above). Former Tourism minister Prisca Mupfumira has since lost her Cabinet position and is due to appear in court on corruption charges after her July arrest.

Gumbo’s inexplicable release triggered an outcry, with accusations that he is being protected by President Emmerson Mnangagwa with whom he enjoys a close friendship.

Sources close to developments at ZACC said Gumbo would appear in court.

“There is an agreement among the commissioners that their credibility is on the line so the issue is far from over. Matanda-Moyo is obviously under serious political pressure but it is not just about her; the other commissioners will not stand for any backpedalling on the charges. Gumbo will appear in court one way or another,” the source said.

Economic Indicators Affecting Forex Market

Post published in: Featured

The Number Of Trump Circuit Judges Is Frankly Astounding

Cramming for the CCPA

Cramming for the CCPA

The California Consumer Privacy Act, the most significant privacy regulation ever enacted in the United States, takes effect in January 2020. Join us for a free webinar to learn more.

The California Consumer Privacy Act, the most significant privacy regulation ever enacted in the United States, takes effect in January 2020. Join us for a free webinar to learn more.

California Consumer Privacy Act and the future of the health data economy – MedCity News

Organizations engaging with personal healthcare data need to pay close attention to the rapidly evolving regulatory environment. Over the next few years, the compliance requirements around personal healthcare data are set to evolve at breakneck speed. Surviving and thriving in this environment of regulatory change will require a more strategic approach to managing personal data.

For decades, personal healthcare data was regulated by a patchwork of federal and state-level, industry-specific data protection rules that left significant gaps in coverage. As a result, an individual’s healthcare data – and all personally identifiable data within organizations working with healthcare information – fell under data protection rules only in some circumstances. Not surprisingly, today most individuals do not understand when their healthcare data is protected by data privacy rules and when it is not.

Now, the advent of new state-level data privacy laws, such as the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA), and the possibility of a comprehensive federal level law means it’s likely that those gaps in regulatory coverage will be filled, creating a range of new compliance requirements. These new data privacy rules – covering the previous gaps – present an opportunity for healthcare industry organizations to enhance the trust within their data relationships. Let’s look at an example of what is happening to see both the challenges and the possibilities.

Exploring CCPA and healthcare data
The impact of the CCPA on healthcare data privacy compliance will be significant, and so it makes a good case study for understanding what is to come. Until the CCPA – which comes into force in January 2020 – healthcare data privacy and security in California was primarily regulated through HIPAA. However, HIPAA only applies to “covered entities” holding “protected health information.” HIPAA’s focus is primarily health insurance, so organizations in scope include hospitals, clinics, insurance providers and clearing houses that process medical data.

In contrast, the CCPA applies to all for-profit organizations that do business in California that operate above certain revenue and data processing thresholds. The CCPA exempts personal data protected by HIPAA and California’s Confidentiality of Medical Information Act (CMIA) – so some types of personal healthcare data continue to be covered by the existing rules. However, CCPA now covers most other personal data created, processed and exchanged by the healthcare industry – filling in the gaps.

Understanding three big changes CCPA brings

CCPA will significantly alter the rules of the game for personal data in the healthcare industry. Below are three key ways in which organizations will need to rethink data privacy:

  1. Under CCPA, all individuals within healthcare organizations have their data privacy protected, including their personal healthcare data. Currently, individuals who are not patients within healthcare organizations are not covered by HIPAA, from a personal data perspective – including doctors, nurses, and other employees. CCPA changes all of this in California. When it comes into force, all of the personal data of non-patients engaging with HIPAA-covered healthcare organizations will be covered by the regulation. As a result, HIPAA-covered organizations (as well as other healthcare organizations) will now need to have policies and processes for the protection of all of their employees’ personal data, including any healthcare data they may hold. They will also have to protect any employee data shared with third parties. There has been some temporary relief with passage of California Assembly Bill 5 (AB5), but it doesn’t exempt organizations of all requirements under CCPA.
  2. With CCPA, other types of organizations that handle personal healthcare data will need to put protections in place. Thousands of organizations operating in California that are not covered by HIPAA – from pharmaceutical companies to the makers of watches that capture health statistics – will now need to comply with the CCPA’s requirements for all of the personal data they hold and process. This includes personal healthcare data, which is of a particularly sensitive nature. These organizations will need to put in place new approaches for securely managing all of this personal data. They will also need to communicate these changes to the individuals impacted. Many US consumers are not aware that their personal healthcare data isn’t legally protected under many circumstances, and so these communications will need to be undertaken with care. However, there is a real opportunity here to enhance consumer relationships if these activities are done well.
  3. Healthcare companies doing business in California will have to apply CCPA to their entire US organization. Healthcare organizations often operate in state-based silos because of the nature of state-specific regulations. However, CCPA breaks down the silos from a data protection perspective. Healthcare industry organizations that process data on California residents will have to apply CCPA data protection policies and processes across their entire corporate network, managing this personal data in a more coherent way. This may create steep compliance challenges for many organizations not used to operating across state boundaries.

These are significant changes to the way personal data – and healthcare data in particular – needs to be handled under CCPA. They will require impacted healthcare organizations to make substantial changes to the way they obtain, process and store this information. Organizations may be tempted to try and comply by implementing a variety of point solutions to tackle individual issues. However, this would be a costly and inefficient approach given the scale of the changes that have already happened, and of those to come.

Preparing for the healthcare data revolution
For organizations in the healthcare industry, the impact of CCPA is just the beginning. A number of states, including Washington and New York, are working on putting their own CCPA-style regulations in place. At the federal level, a new data privacy bill is viewed as having enough strong support from both Republicans and Democrats to actually make it into law before the next presidential election cycle. Hearings are being held, and draft legislation, including a bill in the Senate, is making its way through the legislative process.

Change is coming, and it is coming soon. Healthcare industry organizations operating outside of California will soon have to face the same kinds of issues described above. In such an environment, a strategic approach to meeting personal data requirements over the long term makes sense. Tactical fixes aimed at short-term CCPA compliance may not be scalable to manage the coming multi-state or US-wide personal data rules. A proactive, enterprise-wide approach to data privacy enables organizations to scale compliance across multiple regulations quickly and easily.

It also empowers the organization to engage in a more proactive and responsive way with individuals. Prepared organizations can concentrate on enhancing the relationship of trust they have with their customers while competitors are still working hard to comply. Healthcare organizations that choose to implement an intelligent approach to data privacy once will be able to thrive in an environment of intense regulatory change.

Photo: LeoWolfert, Getty Images

Masa Son’s Masterwork Is A PowerPoint Presentation About WeWork That Will One Day Hang In The Louvre

One solitary slide in the WeWork autopsy report to SoftBank investors is a true encapsulation of the artist’s soul.

Lawline’s November CLE: Starting a New Franchise, SCOTUS Review, and More

The holiday season – and many CLE deadlines – are just around the corner. Whether you’re hoping to squeeze in some CLE before you travel, or looking to finish your CLE requirements before the end of the year, Lawline has you covered. With over 35 programs on the calendar in November, with topics ranging from key SCOTUS cases and corporate whistleblower protections, we’ve got something for everyone. Check out some of November’s CLE highlights below.

How to Franchise a Business: A Practitioner’s Guide. If you’re advising a client looking to turn their existing business into a franchise, it’s important to be aware of a number of different state laws, as well as the Federal Trade Commission regulations. This program will cover the applicable laws and regulations, as well as practical advice for guiding potential franchisors. Airing Monday, November 4, 2019 at 11:30 a.m. (EST

State & Local Government Issues at the Supreme Court, 2018 – 2020. This program will review some of the most interesting Supreme Court cases from the 2018 – 2019 term, and a few cases from the upcoming 2019 – 2020 term, that will have a large impact on state and local governance. There’s something for every kind of lawyer in this one. Airing Tuesday, November 12, 2019 at 2:30 p.m. (EST)

Hot Topics in Corporate Whistleblower Protections. This timely program offers a discussion of recent developments in protections for corporate whistleblowers, including the Taxpayer First Act, protected conduct under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, the impact of Wadler v. Bio-Rad, and more. Airing Thursday, November 14, 2019 at 3:00 p.m. (EST)

If you can’t attend a live webcast, don’t worry! All of our courses go on-demand within 48 hours after airing (and you can check them out with our free trial). Check out these highly rated programs that were recently added to our catalog:

How to Succeed in a Contested Guardianship Proceeding. Regardless of who an attorney represents in a contested guardianship proceeding, the goal should be to protect the Respondent with diminished capacity. This program covers trial tips to achieve this outcome for attorneys representing either party, and pitfalls to avoid. Originally aired on October 1, 2019

Cybersecurity & Data Privacy: Regulatory and Enforcement Update. Recent cybersecurity enforcement has seen lawmakers asking businesses to protect their data, networks, and customer information or face stiff penalties. This program reviews recent enforcement trends, legal developments in cybersecurity, and predictions for 2020. Originally aired on October 10, 2019

Representing Plaintiffs in Wrongful Death Cases. This program provides strategies for trials involving wrongful death claims, including best practices in mediation, out-of-court settlements, handling experts at trial, issues for the surviving family members, and much more. Originally aired on October 22, 2019

Kim Kardashian Has Given Up Her Social Life To Go To ‘Law School’

(Photo by Dia Dipasupil/Getty Images)

I’m definitely working really hard and it’s a commitment that I’ve chosen to take this time away from my family to study and to not go out with my friends and live a different life. And I’m so OK with that.

Kim Kardashian West, discussing her legal aspirations during a panel at the New York Times DealBook Conference earlier this week. “I love it and I just hope that one day I can start a firm that will help with prison reform,” the first-year legal apprentice continued. She again reiterated her desire to hire people who are currently behind bars, because “they know the law better than most lawyers.”


Staci ZaretskyStaci Zaretsky is a senior editor at Above the Law, where she’s worked since 2011. She’d love to hear from you, so please feel free to email her with any tips, questions, comments, or critiques. You can follow her on Twitter or connect with her on LinkedIn.