Tuesday, Friday, What’s The Difference?

“It is  Friday. I think,” as I double-check my calendar on the phone.

⚙️ It could be any other day.

⚙️ I might have believed you if you told me it was Tuesday!

⬛ The days of the week have become suggestions.

⬛ ⬛ The differences among days are marginal at best.

⬛ ⬛ ⬛ The days are remarkably similar.

So, Tuesday or Friday? The choice is yours!

❓ How do you keep your days apart?

❓  Are Fridays not special anymore?


Olga V. Mack is the CEO of Parley Pro, a next-generation contract management company that has pioneered online negotiation technology. Olga embraces legal innovation and had dedicated her career to improving and shaping the future of law. She is convinced that the legal profession will emerge even stronger, more resilient, and more inclusive than before by embracing technology. Olga is also an award-winning general counsel, operations professional, startup advisor, public speaker, adjunct professor, and entrepreneur. She founded the Women Serve on Boards movement that advocates for women to participate on corporate boards of Fortune 500 companies. She authored Get on Board: Earning Your Ticket to a Corporate Board Seat and Fundamentals of Smart Contract Security. You can follow Olga on Twitter @olgavmack.

Betting Boldly In A Bear Market

(image via Getty)

The story of the stock market during the Great Recession doesn’t take long to tell. The markets crashed hard, with the S&P 500 dropping by roughly 50% in 2008. The economy continued to suffer through 2009 until a combination of stimulus, tax policy, and old-fashioned hard work served as the defibrillator-like jolt the economy needed to come back to life. By 2013, the market had regained its losses, and it continued trending upward until this year.

Unfortunately, during that 2007-09 bear market, many spooked investors cashed out to wait for more favorable conditions. By the time many felt comfortable investing again, the upswing was in full effect, and the price to re-enter the market was high. Not only had these overly cautious investors lost a huge portion of their starting wealth, they had also missed a crucial part of the recovery and ended up poorer long-term as a result. The average investor sold low and bought high, while those who sold their stock at the trough of the market made out like bandits.

Both these stories are quick to tell and easy to understand. So why does Biglaw seem hell-bent on repeating those same mistakes today?

Turtling Up

Don’t get me wrong, there’s every reason to be skittish right now about our country’s economic prospects. The American economy is woozy and wary, maybe even a little punch drunk. Things haven’t gone as apocalyptically bad as some expected, but it’s still been rough. The other shoe is currently set to drop at the end of this week, when federal unemployment benefits halt, with no extension likely to happen in the short-term. While pharmaceutical companies are making progress on a COVID-19 vaccine faster than any other in history, it’s still unlikely we’ll have one by the end of the year.

When we’re sitting in the middle of a once-in-a-century adverse event like COVID-19, it’s both instinctual and easy to play defense. Cutting costs and eliminating redundancies are evergreen strategies, but they’re especially easy sells in a bear market. Halting capital expenditures and investment in the long-term is par for the course. Many businesses are hoarding cash (sometimes literally — there’s a national shortage of loose change).

More than anything, though, our instinct seems to be to simply freeze in place while we see how things develop. COVID-19 and its uncertainties have caused law firms to massively slow down lateral hiring and mergers. Large infrastructure-building projects are being paused, and expansion efforts are being put on hold. Fear has caused our industry to freeze like a deer in the headlights — which, it must be noted, traditionally doesn’t work out too well for the deer.

Reading The Room

Running a business is about balancing risk and reward. Even in a pandemic, however, the laws of supply and demand remain in effect. There are millions of other actors in the economy making their own risk-reward decisions in real time, and those decisions in the aggregate affect any decision you’re setting out to make. When a horde of investors want a single stock, that stock gets more expensive to buy.

From a management perspective, this means when the competition is putting its resources into playing it “safe,” in many real ways it becomes more costly for you to do the same. You may get more bang for your buck by getting aggressive, since doing so is likely cheaper than usual. Conversely, when the market as a whole is going full bull, safe investments may be underpriced and more worthy of your time. When everyone else is paying a premium to zig, the cost of zagging goes down.

Many, many people lost their homes, livelihoods, and hope in the wake of the collapse of mortgage-backed securities, but a number of savvy investors made big bets, and gargantuan profits, during the uncertainty that followed. Warren Buffett put $5 billion into a battered Goldman Sachs to keep them going in 2008, and made back his investment plus over $3 billion more in profits in just three years. And Buffett was far from the only investor to make major returns off their moves in the scary days following the market collapse. There was money to be made by those with the gumption and foresight to make it. And with the rest of the competition playing defense, the field was wide open for those who were ready to make a play.

While Buffett and Berkshire Hathaway have leverage and cash resources that few of us can emulate, it doesn’t take billions of dollars to turn a recession to your firm’s advantage. It just takes smarts, savvy, and courage.

Bring It Back To Biglaw

So what does this mean for law firms? In my humble opinion, it means now, more than ever, is a time for smart strategic growth. If the rest of the legal market is piling into one investment class, the price of other investments presumably goes down. Smart firm managers can use that to their advantage.

Consider the lateral market, which has largely dried up save for the blue-chip, rain-making, guaranteed-profitability, turn-key practice groups. These unicorns command a hefty premium from firms that want to bring them over, even in the best of markets. In a risk-averse market like the one we’re facing today, the price to bring in a guaranteed rainmaker is as high as it will likely get.

So why buy high? Why spend firm resources on an inflated asset with razor-thin margins when you could instead spread that investment across several underpriced alternatives with bigger upside? Why not instead take a risk by bringing in some younger laterals without mega books but big potential for growth? If no one else is hiring in that market, a savvy firm manager could cherry pick an entire slate of future revenue-generating stars for the price of a single current-day blue chip partner.

Similarly, if the rest of the market is putting a pause on mergers, doesn’t it make sense to consider moving forward on the right kind of deal at full speed? If we’re fearful of a future downturn in the economy, the time to seek out or complete any contemplated merger is now. Get new staff onboarded, get redundancies reduced and efficiencies of scale in place, and be actively stronger as we prepare for the coming bear market. If we sit and wait for conditions to become more favorable, for everyone else to give us permission to be bold, opportunities will pass us by.

To be clear, I’m not saying cash out your firm’s retirement accounts, take them to Vegas, and hope for the best. Investments and risks always must be smart and calculated. I expect few, if any firms will make it through these next few years without feeling at least some pinch. But it’s during times like these that the moves get made that shape the coming decade.

Those who are bold enough to take risks will be the ones to reap the rewards.


James Goodnow is the CEO and managing partner of NLJ 250 firm Fennemore Craig. At age 36, he became the youngest known chief executive of a large law firm in the U.S. He holds his JD from Harvard Law School and dual business management certificates from MIT. He’s currently attending the Cambridge University Judge Business School (U.K.), where he’s working toward a master’s degree in entrepreneurship. James is the co-author of Motivating Millennials, which hit number one on Amazon in the business management new release category. As a practitioner, he and his colleagues created and run a tech-based plaintiffs’ practice and business model. You can connect with James on Twitter (@JamesGoodnow) or by emailing him at James@JamesGoodnow.com.

Biglaw Firms Do An About Face On Pay Cuts

(Image via Getty)

COVID-19 did more than just rock our healthcare system. It also caused great financial upheaval, and the legal industry — even those at elite Biglaw firms — was far from immune from the impacts. For months, Above the Law reported on the layoffsfurloughs, and associate salary cuts that were rocking the profession. But now it’s clear that, at least for some firms, the worst seems to be behind them.

Lowenstein Sandler had cut back on partner distributions, but there’ve been signs the firm’s financial condition is pretty solid. Indeed, firm chairman and managing partner Gary Wingens told Law.com that after halting partner distributions from February through April, the firm was able to pay higher than usual distributions in May and June.

“Clients and practices are far more resilient than we had feared heading into the recession, and even the practices that had a pretty severe demand shock in April are reversing and had come back pretty fast by June,” said Wingens.

The firm’s rebound has been buoyed largely by its bankruptcy and capital markets practices, but even its mergers & acquisitions practice is back to form:

“In our M&A practice, demand dropped by 35% year over year in April, but by the middle of June, demand was only off 5%,” Wingens said. “Not only did we see a lot of deals that went on hold in March and April come back, but we’re now seeing clients willing to do new M&A deals, even if they’re not physically getting together.”

Cozen O’Connor was working to avoid layoffs and associate salary cuts during the worst of the economic uncertainty caused by COVID, but they also put partner distributions on hold and furloughed some administrative staff members. Firm executive chairman and CEO Michael Heller confirmed that, as of July 1, partners’ pay checks were back to normal. However, no word yet on what’s happened to the furloughed employees.

At Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner, salaries (for anyone making over $40,000) were cut by 15 percent back in April and the firm announced layoffs earlier this month. Though the firm is not back to pre-COVID shape, they did decide to roll back the severity of the salary cuts, going from 15 percent cuts to 7.5 percent.

“After exceeding performance expectations during the first half of this extraordinary year, we’re pleased to begin rolling back salary reductions necessitated during the worst of the pandemic conditions,” BCLP co-chairs Lisa Mayhew and Steve Baumer said in a statement at the time of the recent changes.

Things are looking up in Texas too. In May, Munck Wilson Mandela reduced compensation for partners, associates, exempt directors, and managers, while some partners voluntarily deferred the entirety of their compensation for three months and some staff were furloughed or had their hours reduced. As of July 1, the firm has confirmed that all employees were back to their standard compensation.

Let’s hope more firms are able to roll back COVID-19 austerity measures — and soon.

If your firm or organization is slashing salaries, bringing folks back to pre-COVID salaries, closing its doors, or reducing the ranks of its lawyers or staff, whether through open layoffs, stealth layoffs, or voluntary buyouts, please don’t hesitate to let us know. Our vast network of tipsters is part of what makes Above the Law thrive. You can email us or text us (646-820-8477).

If you’d like to sign up for ATL’s Layoff Alerts, please scroll down and enter your email address in the box below this post. If you previously signed up for the layoff alerts, you don’t need to do anything. You’ll receive an email notification within minutes of each layoff, salary cut, or furlough announcement that we publish.


headshotKathryn Rubino is a Senior Editor at Above the Law, and host of The Jabot podcast. AtL tipsters are the best, so please connect with her. Feel free to email her with any tips, questions, or comments and follow her on Twitter (@Kathryn1).

Biglaw Insurers Don’t Care If New Associates Have Diploma Privilege

Generally speaking, we are not overly concerned about privilege diplomas with large law firms and don’t anticipate any policy changes with respect to large law firms.

— Christopher Gomprecht, national practice leader for lawyers’ professional liability at Allianz Global Corporate & Specialty, NA, which provides coverage for more than half of all Am Law 100 firms, commenting on the prospect of new associates practicing without having taken a bar exam. Nancy Montroy, director of underwriting at ALAS, which covers 83 of the 200 largest firms, said her company’s policy doesn’t even take licensing into consideration.


Staci ZaretskyStaci Zaretsky is a senior editor at Above the Law, where she’s worked since 2011. She’d love to hear from you, so please feel free to email her with any tips, questions, comments, or critiques. You can follow her on Twitter or connect with her on LinkedIn.

Law Schools Go Remote… Should Students Get A Discount?

(Image via Getty)

Joe and Kathryn check in on how the Fall semester of law school is shaping up. With COVID looming over the beginning of the school year, many law schools are going to continue fully remote learning. Several schools have also made it clear that they won’t be offering any discounts on tuition. Is this fair? While there’s a lot of consternation out there, it probably is justified. But don’t think we’re letting law schools off the hook for some of the other bad decisions they’re announcing.

This Is What A Socially Distanced Bar Exam Looks Like… Do You Feel Safe?

Despite public health warnings, almost half the country is still going forward with in-person bar exams next week. In an even crueler twist, the Venn Diagram of states sticking to the in-person model falls almost entirely within the circle of states setting daily infection records. Bringing people from all over the state under one roof for two days in close proximity is the sort of thing a responsible government health entity would stop as a definitional superspreader event. But when a bar exam doesn’t bother to consult with health officials until less than a month before the test, like North Carolina, you can end up with something like this.

We’ve talked about the square footage required to place everyone in the center of a 3 foot radius bubble that keeps them 6 feet from anyone else, but there’s no substitute for actually seeing it. That… doesn’t look like much of anything. The “6 feet” rule is designed to keep people apart when quickly passing each other in the grocery store, it’s not intended as a guide for remaining stationary for hours on end. If there’s any question that the NCBLE views public health as an afterthought, remember that it wasn’t until July 1 that the they even required everyone to wear masks during the examination. Before that, they were happy to rely on their “don’t sue us if you die” signs.

Making this even more ridiculous…

Look at all the additional room they had to space people out. Distancing is described in terms of the floor not the ceiling folks. If the examiners wanted to put people 8 feet away from each other, that would not go awry.

But it’s all going to be alright, because faced with concern about the safety protocols, the NCBLE have just announced an emergency step to make everyone safe:

Well, that’s a relief!

The new score, which is still more restrictive than many jurisdictions including New York, highlights exactly how artificial the “but 20 percent of applicants fail the bar exam” canard is. Bar examiners set the score to arrive at roughly that figure and this announcement is not an accommodation but a recognition that they expect slightly lower overall scores under these conditions. That the examiners simultaneously announced that the score would return to 270 in July 2021 proves that.

In any event, this is what a two-day exam is going to look like. This is the altar where we’ll make our sacrifices for the profession’s hazing ritual.

Earlier: Law Firm Sends Letter To Governor Demanding He Stop In-Person July Bar Exam To Protect Public
North Carolina Also Demands Waiver In Case It Kills Anyone With Bar Exam


HeadshotJoe Patrice is a senior editor at Above the Law and co-host of Thinking Like A Lawyer. Feel free to email any tips, questions, or comments. Follow him on Twitter if you’re interested in law, politics, and a healthy dose of college sports news. Joe also serves as a Managing Director at RPN Executive Search.

Reports Of Associate Stealth Layoffs At Am Law 100 Firm

For a couple of weeks, we here at Above the Law have been hearing rumors of stealth layoffs at Fox Rothschild, a firm that rose to 69th on the most recent edition of the Am Law 100.

For those who might only be hearing the term for the first time, stealth layoffs allow firms to cut headcount without confirming that there were economic-based layoffs. So, they’ll give the associates X number of months/weeks to find a new job and the firm frequently couches the reductions in performance review terms, that just, purely coincidentally, happen in the midst of an economic downturn. By their secretive nature, they can be challenging to confirm in specific numbers, but insiders slowly find out something is amiss.

Fox Rothschild previously cut salaries amid the economic upheaval surrounding COVID-19, but multiple tipsters at the firm have reported layoffs — given the veneer of performance-related terminations. As one insider told Above the Law:

the firm fires people, mainly attorneys across all offices in a matter of one-two weeks and tries to give pretextual reasons for the firing, not admitting they are of course COVID-related financial cut backs.

We reached out to the firm, and they were able to confirm firing associates (though a smaller number than what tipsters are reporting). Mark Morris, Firmwide Managing Partner, had this to say about the terminations:

6 associates from Fox Rothschild were terminated. These dismissals stem from productivity and performance issues. We are assisting these individuals in their job transition.

Best of luck to those associates who now find themselves looking for work (and health insurance) amid a global pandemic/economic downturn.

If your firm or organization is slashing salaries, closing its doors, or reducing the ranks of its lawyers or staff, whether through open layoffs, stealth layoffs, or voluntary buyouts, please don’t hesitate to let us know. Our vast network of tipsters is part of what makes Above the Law thrive. You can email us or text us (646-820-8477).

If you’d like to sign up for ATL’s Layoff Alerts, please scroll down and enter your email address in the box below this post. If you previously signed up for the layoff alerts, you don’t need to do anything. You’ll receive an email notification within minutes of each layoff, salary cut, or furlough announcement that we publish.


headshotKathryn Rubino is a Senior Editor at Above the Law, and host of The Jabot podcast. AtL tipsters are the best, so please connect with her. Feel free to email her with any tips, questions, or comments and follow her on Twitter (@Kathryn1).

Change Management For In-House Counsel

Left to right, top to bottom: Monique Burt Williams, Tiffany Archer, Olga V. Mack, Julie Miller, Brittanie Chin-Merkerson, and Jennifer Chung.

Cadence Counsel, the in-house division of the Lateral Link consortium of legal recruitment firms, has convened a panel of corporate executives and law department leaders to discuss the value of using traditional Change Management strategies to address the challenges that are unique to corporate law departments. In a series of discussions moderated by David Lat, the prominent legal commentator and founder of Above the Law, attendees will be encouraged to participate in this unique virtual think tank as we consider what it means for law departments to lead through today’s legal landscape.

What is Change Management?

Change Management consists of the process, tools, and techniques used to manage the human side of change for the achievement and sustainment of a desired business outcome. Change Management focuses on the people impacted by change by helping employees to understand, commit to, accept, and adopt changes in their current business environment. A process that helps individuals to navigate organizational transition, Change Management strategies can be uniquely applied to the management of in-house law departments, particularly in the areas of compliance, technology, and culture.

The In-house Change Management series will take place over the next several months. The first panel, scheduled for Tuesday, August 11, at 12:30 p.m. ET, will offer a broad overview of Change Management, including discussion of the following topics:

  1. What is Change Management?
  2. Why are we talking about this now?
  3. What has COVID done to our ability to navigate and manage change?
  4. Why would law departments need Change Management internally?
  5. When is the “right” time for in-house law departments to consider the use of traditional Change Management strategies?
  6. What steps can you take to start adopting a Change Management mindset/frame of mind?
  7. What in-house “changes” can we expect as a result of COVID — e.g., a move to the corporate generalist, increased/enhanced technology, training our internal customers on when to engage us, and especially now, culture, including diversity and inclusion — and how can we apply these strategies to effectively move through the change process?
  8. How can legal departments positively influence Change Management more broadly within their organizations?
  9. How can you use Change Management to build a more meaningful experience for your stakeholders?
  10. How does effective Change Management help you meet your business goals and objectives?

The webinar will feature the following panelists:

  • Tiffany Archer – Compliance Officer, Panasonic Avionics
  • Monique Burt Williams – CEO, Cadence Counsel
  • Brittanie Chin-Merkerson – Change Management Consultant, Johnson Controls
  • Jennifer Chung – General Counsel, Accuweather
  • Julie Honor – General Counsel, 3Q Digital
  • Olga V. Mack – Chief Executive Officer, Parley Pro
  • Nishat Ruiter – General Counsel, TED Conference

Please join us for what should be a thought-provoking and practical discussion that will provide invaluable insights, not just to in-house lawyers but to all professionals involved in management and leadership. You can register for the free webinar here.

We look forward to seeing you on August 11!


Lateral Link is one of the top-rated international legal recruiting firms. With over 14 offices worldwide, Lateral Link specializes in placing attorneys at the most prestigious law firms and companies in the world. Managed by former practicing attorneys from top law schools, Lateral Link has a tradition of hiring lawyers to execute the lateral leaps of practicing attorneys. Click here to find out more about us.

Online Bar Exam Software Still Not Working On Friday, Test On Tuesday

“In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is king,” as they say. And while that expression manages to be both ableist and sexist at the same time, the thrust is well-taken. When almost half the country is set to take an in-person exam next week, we have to applaud the states that opted for remote, online exams. Not so much because online exams aren’t fraught with their own problems, but because we should give proper acknowledgement whenever a state “doesn’t want to kill people.”

In 2020, this is the threshold.

So we were among those who cheered on Indiana for being an early adopter of the online exam. But online exams present their own problems with America’s unstable internet infrastructure, access concerns, difficulties guaranteeing a private and quiet area to take the test, and issues with online proctoring protocols. And, as it turns out, they also have problems simply getting the test off the ground.

From Reddit:

Online testing was bound to present platform issues but one figured there was enough time to sort those out. And perhaps by October when most online testing jurisdictions plan to go forward, we’ll have this worked out.

But for now, this really makes you wonder why we have to have a bar exam this year at all.

Earlier: Indiana Orders Remote Bar Exam In Fit Of Reasonableness
NY Moves To Online Exam… For Now
Online LSAT Is Glitchy… So OBVIOUSLY The Takeaway Is To Never Try Online Bar Exams


HeadshotJoe Patrice is a senior editor at Above the Law and co-host of Thinking Like A Lawyer. Feel free to email any tips, questions, or comments. Follow him on Twitter if you’re interested in law, politics, and a healthy dose of college sports news. Joe also serves as a Managing Director at RPN Executive Search.

Biglaw Firm To Pay Penalty Over Discrimination Claim

Yesterday, the Department of Justice announced that the Biglaw firm of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer, along with legal staffing company Law Resources, will pay a civil penalty to settle discrimination claims. The settlement, totaling $56,500, is for claims that Law Resources, at the direction of Arnold & Porter, refused to hire U.S. citizens with dual citizenship and non-U.S. citizens with work authorization for a document review project in violation of the Immigration and Nationality Act.

As reported by Law.com, the claims were originated by attorney Temitope Ogunrinu. A DOJ investigation revealed dual citizens and non-citizens with work authorization were excluded from the project as a result of Arnold & Porter’s improper interpretation of the International Traffic in Arms Regulations. It also found that Law Resources retaliated against Ogunrinu as a result of her objection to the restriction.

Assistant attorney general Eric Dreiband made a statement about the settlement:

“The United States of America is the land of opportunity, and the United States government remains committed fully to the fundamental principle that in this country, all people authorized by law to work should be able to pursue happiness by earning a living without suffering the indignity of discrimination because of where they came from,” assistant attorney general Eric Dreiband of the Civil Rights Division said in a statement. “Our law protects this ideal in many ways, including by prohibiting unlawful citizenship status restrictions in hiring.”

Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer said the following about the case:

“This case involves a single incident where the firm mistakenly provided a third-party vendor inaccurate information about the criteria for selecting contractors for a document review,” the firm said in a statement. “As soon as this inadvertent mistake was brought to our attention, the Firm took steps to prevent it from happening again. Additionally, we cooperated fully with the IER in resolving the matter.”

And, as Dreiband went on to say, “We look forward to working with Law Resources and Arnold & Porter to ensure their hiring procedures fully comply with the Immigration and Nationality Act’s prohibition against citizenship status discrimination in employment.”


headshotKathryn Rubino is a Senior Editor at Above the Law, and host of The Jabot podcast. AtL tipsters are the best, so please connect with her. Feel free to email her with any tips, questions, or comments and follow her on Twitter (@Kathryn1).