Zimbabwe takes steps to secure maize – The Zimbabwean

The announcement comes after the government of Zimbabwe made the decision in December 2019 to allow millers and other groups to use free funds to import maize.

“Since then, up to now, I am glad we have put mechanisms to have maize into the country,” Tafadzwa Musarara, chair of GMAZ, said on Jan. 21. “The country’s current demand for commercial (maize) use is 80,000 tonnes, and we have signed up close to 100,000 tonnes with the immediate 50,000 starting to come early next week.”

According to NewZimbabwe.com, the GMAZ has arranged logistics to accommodate the arrival of the grain into Zimbabwe.

“We have of course our own limitations in terms of logistics, but we are making contingent plans … as the grain millers association, we have aggregated our requirements,” Musarara said. “The subsidy started on a rocky note, but I am glad to advise that everything has been resolved.”

Earlier this year, Bloomberg reported that Zimbabwe planned to import maize to circumvent crop loss in the previous year and expected continued drought for 2020. Zimbabwe is currently in the midst of back-to-back droughts, which is causing issues in producing maize.

(Part Of) Argentina Will Not Be Paying Its Bills (For Now Or Possibly Ever)

Book Review: Make LinkedIn Work For You In 2020

What a long strange trip it’s been since the book I co-authored with Carolyn Elefant, Social Media for Lawyers: The Next Frontier, was published in 2010. Back then, trying to convince lawyers to use social media for any reason was a tough sell. Very few lawyers used social media and most wanted nothing to do with it.

How times have changed! These days, according to the results of the latest American Bar Association Legal Technology Survey Report, the vast majority of lawyers and law firms use social media. As shared in the survey results, 80% of lawyers report that their firms maintain a presence on social media, and 80% also personally maintain a social media presence for professional purposes.

Not surprisingly, the results showed that LinkedIn is a popular social media site with lawyers; after all, it’s a “professional” social network. According to the report, the majority of lawyers — 57% — indicated that their law firms maintained a LinkedIn presence, and 73% reported that they personally maintained a LinkedIn profile for professional purposes. 31% even shared that they used LinkedIn for reasons unrelated to professional goals.

Usage varied depending on firm size. Larger firms were most likely to have a presence on LinkedIn, with 82% of firms of 100 or more attorneys having a presence in LinkedIn. Next up were 47% of solos, 45% of midsize firms with 10 to 49 lawyers, and 45% of smaller firms with two to nine lawyers.

When it comes to maintaining personal LinkedIn pages for professional purposes, large-firm lawyers led the way, with 87% of lawyers from firms with 500 or more lawyers using LinkedIn, 88% of lawyers from firms with 100 to 499 lawyers, 82% of lawyers from firms with 50 to 99 lawyers, and 79% of lawyers from firms with 10 to 49 lawyers.

So it’s clear that lawyers and their firms are using LinkedIn. Are you one of them? If so, are you using it as effectively as you could be? Probably not. That’s where the recently published book, Make LinkedIn Work for You: A Practical Handbook for Lawyers and Other Legal Professionals, comes in.

In this book, co-authored by Dennis Kennedy and Allison Shields, you’ll learn everything you need to know about using LinkedIn as a legal professional. There’s something for everyone in this book, regardless of whether you’ve been on Linkedin for years or whether it’s a new endeavor.

Trust me on this. As someone whose been on LinkedIn for more than a decade now and who has over 221,000 followers, I like to think I’ve got a pretty good handle on using LinkedIn. Even so, I learned about quite a few new features that I had been previously unaware of.

At  the outset, the authors offer the following very important advice: if you don’t know what you’re trying to accomplish on Linkedin, you’ll have no idea whether the time you spend on LinkedIn is worth it. That’s why, as they explain, it’s so important to determine your goals in order to get the most out of LinkedIn:

“What are you hiring LinkedIn to do?”…For example, if you are “hiring” LinkedIn to help you find a job, you will use it differently than if you are hiring LinkedIn to help you fill an open position. If you want to hire LinkedIn to find new local clients for your law practice, you will do something different than if you want to hire it to help you find speaking opportunities. Our sense is that LinkedIn will work best for most lawyers and other legal professionals if they hire it to help them create, manage, and care for their network of referrers and potential referrers of business.

The book is divided into six sections. The first section covers the basics and helps you understand how to create (or re-create) an effective profile. It also offers an overview of the platform (both the online and mobile versions), the different account settings, and the benefits of both regular and premium accounts.

Sections 2 through 4 offer a deeper dive into the essentials of LinkedIn profiles, the ins and outs of connecting with others on LinkedIn, and how to effectively participate on LinkedIn in order to achieve your stated goals. Section 5 delves into strategical considerations in greater detail, and Section 6 covers a host of different topics including how to: 1) conduct job searches, 2) used LinkedIn business tools, 3) navigate legal ethics issues, and 4) locate relevant resources.

One great tip that comes in really handy at professional networking events is how to enable and use LinkedIn’s “Find Nearby” feature. I recently used this feature at a conference I attended over the summer and it made it super easy to connect with other conference attendees. In Chapter 13 the authors explain how it works:

If you are at a conference or meeting where people are willing to try the feature, you can ask everyone with the app to turn it on. Everyone will see who else on LinkedIn with feature turned on is present. It then is a simple matter of clicking on people and immediately connecting with them.

Speaking of connecting with others, you can find me on Linkedin here. Then, buy the book, learns the ins and outs of LinkedIn, and put some of your newfound knowledge to work!


Nicole Black is a Rochester, New York attorney and Director of Business and Community Relations at MyCase, web-based law practice management software. She’s been blogging since 2005, has written a weekly column for the Daily Record since 2007, is the author of Cloud Computing for Lawyers, co-authors Social Media for Lawyers: the Next Frontier, and co-authors Criminal Law in New York. She’s easily distracted by the potential of bright and shiny tech gadgets, along with good food and wine. You can follow her on Twitter at @nikiblack and she can be reached at niki.black@mycase.com.

When Trademarks Attack: How To Detect And Disarm Doppelgänger Domains

Cybercriminals have a decided advantage when it comes to tricking the public. The human tendency to gloss over small, yet important, details like a misplaced period or an inverted set of adjacent letters can yield immeasurable value to these so-called typosquatters. Whether prompting speed-readers to head over to an unsafe website, or directing corporate insiders via email to transfer funds, doppelgänger domains continue to vex lawyers and security experts alike.

Although the increased reliance on web-searching (where a search term is run through a search engine) in lieu of typing in a specific web domain into an address bar has resulted in a diminished need for defensive domain name acquisition as far as web presence and accessibility, typosquatting (also called URL jacking), remains a vulnerability for phishing attacks against companies, according to Lesley McCall Grossberg, Counsel at BakerHostetler, who focuses her practice on IP litigation.

Grossberg believes that phishing attacks, by which an email is sent to company employees directing them to take action -– typically, wiring funds or providing credentials to accounts, predominantly impacts financial services firms and educational institutions most, as unsuspecting email recipients may be more likely to hand over personal or sensitive information if they believe it is being requested of them from their bank or university.

To best understand the impact of these exploits, it’s critical to understand the actors’ motivations. Typosquatting as an exploit is typically designed to compel any of the following objectives:

  • Sale of the domain back to the brand owner at a premium price
  • Creation of ad revenue from the site where traffic lands
  • Redirection of business to a competitor’s website
  • Commissions earned by redirecting typo-traffic back to the brand itself through an affiliate link
  • Passwords intercepts when visitors visit fake websites
  • Malware or adware revenue for illicit installs on visitors’ devices
  • Harvesting of e-mail messages mistakenly sent to the typo domain for valuable information
  • Dissemination of disinformation

Researchers at Godai Group who studied this issue profiled Fortune 500 companies and found that 30 percent were vulnerable to doppelgänger domain activity, detailing in their investigation that specialty retailers were the most susceptible to these exploits, followed closely by commercial banks and telecommunications companies.

The Legal Landscape

The Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act, enacted in 1999, first established a cause of action in the U.S. for intentionally registering, trafficking in, or using a domain name confusingly similar to, or dilutive of, a trademark or personal name. While the GDPR-induced recent policy changes of redacting private information from the ‘WhoIs’ domain registry has made identifying the registrant of a domain more difficult, an action for transfer of the doppelgänger domain name can be brought under the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)’s Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP). Even if the registered domain name does not itself resolve to an active website, “using the disputed domain name as an email address to pass the registrant off as the complainant in a phishing scheme is evidence of bad faith registration and use, as required by under UDRP,” Grossberg said.

UDRP allows trademark holders to file a case at World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) for international violations. The complainant has to show that the registered domain name is identical or ‘confusingly similar’ to their trademark, that the registrant has no legitimate interest in the domain name, and that the domain name is being used in bad faith.

Organizations like the Commission Against Domain Name Abuse (CADNA), a nonprofit organization formed in 2007 to combat online infringement of brands and trademarks online across all top-level domains, represent the interests of companies in advocating for protections against these abuses.

Getting Ahead Of The Twinning Problem

Security and legal experts alike recommend several steps for mitigating doppelgänger danger. Be proactive and beat miscreants to the punch by purchasing and registering every conceivable doppelgänger domain before they do. Another approach that security experts recommend is configuring Domain Name System (DNS) servers to not resolve any doppelgänger domains to protect internal-only e-mail from being accidentally sent to a doppelgänger.

But just as important as the defensive measures, identifying whether bad actors are already using doppelgänger domains against your company interests is an important element of determining the right way to redress any future harms. Once identified, IP specialists and in-house attorneys are becoming adept at working aggressively to take down copycat domains filing under UDRP.

Gaining an understanding of whether attackers are abusing a company’s doppelgänger can be accomplished in a variety of ways. First, a company might learn first-hand of the use via its employees, customers, or a security company who investigates such security vulnerabilities in connection with a cybersecurity assessment. Second, there are companies that provide reporting around the existence of doppelgängers, such as KnowBe4.

For the protection of foreign domains, the Madrid System through WIPO, is an important element, allowing for a convenient and cost-effective solution for registering and managing trademark protection in up to 122 countries, with a single application and filing fee. It’s important to have that foreign trademark registration in place when trying to take down a domain associated with foreign domains.

Grossberg recommends that once a malicious use of a domain doppelgänger is identified in the U.S., a complaint should be made to the FBI’s Internet Crime Complaint Center (IC3). Another approach she finds effective is to follow up that complaint with a letter to the phisher, when possible, letting them know that a complaint has been submitted. The registration of international trademark rights has the added legal advantage of demonstrating additional evidentiary credibility when working through disputes at the IC3 level.

Finally, in yet another instance where the adage “see something, say something” pays valuable dividends, Grossberg believes, and cybersecurity firms like Nisos concur, that another critical component to solve this complex and vexing issue is to educate company insiders on identifying phishing attacks so that suspicious emails with doppelgänger attributes are immediately identified and forwarded to internal security teams for review, remediation, and referral to the legal department.


Jennifer DeTrani is General Counsel and EVP of Nisos, a technology-enabled cybersecurity firm.  She co-founded a secure messaging platform, Wickr, where she served as General Counsel for five years.  You can connect with Jennifer on Wickr (dtrain), LinkedIn or by email at dtrain@nisos.com.

Samantha Bee Hilariously Slams Impeachment Legal Team

Samantha Bee (Photo by Jamie McCarthy/Getty Images for GLAAD)

The impeachment trial — if we’re calling it that — of Donald Trump continues its depressing move forward. As all of us who know there will never be 67 votes to remove the president from office are aware, this proceeding is more about making the case of Trump’s corruption for history. But we’re going through it, as we must, in the hope that a handful of suburban housewives in Pennsylvania will be convinced not to vote for Trump.

Anyway, in an if-you-don’t-laugh-you’ll-cry segment on Full Frontal with Samantha Bee the host focuses her laser wit on the impeachment legal defense team the president has assembled. The, ahem, legal acumen of Ken Starr, Alan Dershowitz and Rep. Jim Jordan has long been a source of merriment at Above the Law, Bee takes it to another level

Bee describes the triumvirate of  Starr,  Dershowitz and Jordan as “a virtual dream team of rape culture” and then she really lets them have it. I won’t spoil the jokes, but her takedown is on point.

Watch the clip below.

Morning Docket: 01.23.20

(YANN COATSALIOU/AFP/Getty Images)

* Harvey Weinstein’s lawyer is trying to get a mistrial because the prosecution discussed the relationship between Weinstein and former president Bill Clinton. [Variety]

* A New Jersey woman posed as a lawyer to scam immigrants seeking legal help. [NJ.com]

* A new lawsuit filed by the DC Attorney General claims that Trump’s DC hotel was unlawfully enriched by President Trump’s inaugural committee. [CNBC]

* A man accused of stabbing another allegedly tried to eat an incriminating shirt to destroy evidence. Maybe it was an edible shirt? [Syracuse.com]

* The band Aerosmith is embroiled in litigation over whether the drummer should be allowed to play at the upcoming Grammy Awards. Even if the drummer wins, that performance is going to be super awkward. [Fox News]


Jordan Rothman is a partner of The Rothman Law Firm, a full-service New York and New Jersey law firm. He is also the founder of Student Debt Diaries, a website discussing how he paid off his student loans. You can reach Jordan through email at jordan@rothmanlawyer.com.

America’s Chief Stuffed Shirt Lives Up To Title — See Also

Ray Dalio Busts A Rhyme In Davos

Millions at risk after toxins found in Harare water supply, study finds – The Zimbabwean

Water being pumped to millions of residents in Zimbabwe’s capital city came from reservoirs contaminated by dangerous toxins, according to a report seen by the Guardian.

A study conducted by South African company Nanotech Water Solutions concluded that the health of 3 million Harare residents may be endangered by the provision of water containing toxins that can cause liver and central nervous system diseases.

The study, conducted last year, has been seen by the Guardian but has not been made public.

“The primary objective of the trial was to demonstrate the oxidative capacity of chlorine dioxide on the plant’s incoming and inherent algae … and its associated toxins, pathogenic (disease-causing) micro-organisms and other micro-contaminants,” said the report.

Oxidation is a chemical treatment process designed to remove organic and inorganic materials in water. The removal of algae and associated toxins, especially hepatotoxins (toxins that affect the liver) and neurotoxins (toxins that affect the central nervous system), is crucial to the production of safe drinking water.

The toxins, said the report, are found in the algae at Harare’s major water reservoirs, including the Chivero and Manyame lakes. The foul smell and brownish colour of water in Harare are associated with a plethora of algal species, the researchers added.

According to the US Environmental Protection Agency, harmful algae produce dangerous toxins in fresh or marine water. The agency warns people to keep away from water that is green, scummy or smells bad.

News of the report has enraged local people, said Precious Shumba, founder and coordinator of the Harare Residents’ Trust.

“Residents have complained numerous times about the strong stench coming out of the water that the city of Harare is delivering to ratepayers,” she said.

“The water has visible impurities, which creates doubts and insecurities among consumers.”

Shumba said residents were living in fear of contracting diseases as a result of the dirty water, and no longer trusted the city’s supply.

“There is fear of falling sick with cholera, typhoid and other deadly diseases which might be caused by these dirty particles in the city water. The city has always defended the quality of their water, claiming that the particles are harmless, but no one really takes them seriously on this,” Shumba said.

Harare’s mayor, Herbert Gomba, has defended the city’s water quality, insisting it remains safe to drink.

“It’s safe, according to reports from our quality team,” he said.

“I am sure you are aware we are facing forex challenges and that the infrastructure is old and was never meant for the huge population we now serve. Again, we are owed a lot by our people, money which can be used to do more work if we are paid by all who consumed our water. We are working hard to pump more water through refurbishment of the infrastructure.”

Harare city council spends $3m (£2.3m) every month on chemicals intended to purify the water.

Poorer residents like Joyce Mutseyami, 40, who lives in the sleepy Harare suburb of Kambuzuma, are particularly affected by the crisis as they cannot afford to buy still water. Gone are the days when she felt she could drink straight from the tap.

This week, residents had no water for three days. Mutseyami was among many dashing out to their shared backyard taps, waiting in line to collect a bucketload of the muddy liquid that gives off a foul smell and a brownish froth. It was a typical scene in a city that is often without running water for long periods.

“I don’t have a choice [other] than to drink this water. I boil it before consumption because my children may contract diseases,” Mutseyami said.

“One day we will all wake up sick because you are never assured, even if you boil the water, that it is safe. We have petitioned the council before and even took samples of the water, but nothing has been done. It’s getting worse.”

With a baby strapped on her back, Talent Mupemhi, 30, waits impatiently for her turn to fetch water from a local borehole. She has no trust in the local tap water. Yet it was the use of unsafe boreholes and wells that probably led to Zimbabwe’s cholera outbreak in 2018.

Water brawls often erupt when people who dare to skip the line are caught by angry residents. Some even take advantage of the residents’ desperation to charge for borehole water.

Mupemhi has waited for two hours. She does this every day.

“I endure long queues every day to fetch water because I have no choice, tap water is unsafe. I only use it for washing,” said Muphemhi.

“I was once hospitalised after drinking tap water, it is dirty and has a foul smell. Surely people are dying slowly because they do not know what this water contains. There is sewage flowing around, slipping into drinking water. Do you think we are safe?”

Supreme Court won’t expedite ACA appeal – MedCity News

The future of the Affordable Care Act remains in limbo after the Supreme Court denied a motion to expedite its consideration of the health law’s future. The decision, announced on Tuesday, makes it unlikely that the court will hear the case before November’s elections.

In December, an appeals court ruled that the individual mandate was unconstitutional, partially affirming a Texas judge’s ruling that the entire ACA was unconstitutional. The appeals court did not decide what that means for the rest of the health law, sending the case back to the district court to determine if other portions of the ACA are unconstitutional. The case, Texas et al v U.S. et al, was originally filed in 2018 by 20 Republican-led states.

On January 5, California, Washington D.C. and 19 other Democratic-led states filed a petition for the Supreme Court to consider the case on an expedited basis. Normally, the Supreme Court wouldn’t consider hearing the case until March of 2020 at the earliest. With the expedited briefing, Democrats hoped the court would hear the case in the next term, preparing insurers for next year’s enrollment and bringing the topic to the forefront as Election Day approaches.

The states wrote that without a decision, individuals, businesses and states will face “crippling uncertainty” going into 2021.

Insurance trade group America’s Health Insurance Plans (AHIP) and 33 hospital associations also filed comment with the Supreme Court on the case. Their concern was not so much with the striking down of the individual mandate, as it was the uncertainty of the entire ACA’s future after the appeals court decided to remand the case back to the district court.

For example, AHIP wrote, it could affect hundreds of other measures that have nothing to do with the individual mandate, including requirements to provide preventive care at no out-of-pocket cost, guaranteed coverage for individuals with preexisting conditions, and funding for expanded Medicaid programs in 37 states.

“Invalidation of the ACA would wreak havoc on the health care system,” AHIP wrote. “The ACA is not a tapestry that unravels by pulling upon a single thread (i.e., the individual mandate). Rather, the ACA’s multitude of wide-ranging reforms … affect every health insurance market (not just the individual market) and every American with coverage (not just those who purchased coverage on the exchanges).”

Hospital associations added that the uncertainty may lead to slower adoption of new healthcare models, such as accountable care organizations, and will lead to bond rating downgrades that could affect hospitals’ ability to raise capital.

The Supreme Court will return for its next term in October.

Photo credit: Mykola Velychko, Getty Images