Morning Docket: 11.17.20

* A Florida lawyer has been charged with extortion against two NFL players for allegedly asking for cash in exchange for clients recanting robbery and assault allegations. Guess the attorney might be liable for “unnecessary roughness”… [New York Times]

* An Iowa lawyer, who allegedly forged his client’s name on court documents, has been suspended from practice. [Bloomberg Law]

* The Supreme Court may soon determine whether governments can restrict church functions to curb the spread of COVID-19. [New York Times]

* A Colorado lawyer, who was purportedly arrested four times in 2019, has been suspended from practice for over a year. [Denver Post]

* A federal appeals court has revived a lawsuit filed by former New York Knick’s player Charles Oakley over a televised scuffle at a game. Guess Oakley is flexing his muscle in another “court”… [New York Post]


Jordan Rothman is a partner of The Rothman Law Firm, a full-service New York and New Jersey law firm. He is also the founder of Student Debt Diaries, a website discussing how he paid off his student loans. You can reach Jordan through email at jordan@rothmanlawyer.com.

Donald Trump Better Look Out For Cyrus Vance

Manhattan D.A. Cy Vance (Photo by Kevin Hagen/Getty Images)

Come January 20, Donald Trump will step out of office.
And he better watch his step.
He could end up in jail.
No president has ever gone to jail. But Trump is pushing his luck.

— Juan Williams, author and Fox News commentator, writing about the legal consequences that could befall Donald Trump after he’s no longer president. Williams says, “His biggest risk is a guilty verdict if a case comes out of the criminal probe being led by Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus Vance. Vance is looking at ‘extensive and protracted criminal conduct at the Trump Organization,’ according to court documents.”

Even Bill Barr’s Justice Dept. Can’t Deny The Obvious Where Jeffrey Epstein Is Concerned

DACA Lives To Fight Another Day Thanks To the Trump Administration’s Blistering Incompetence

On Saturday, the bill for Donald Trump’s habit of skirting Senate approval by appointing his flavor of the week as Acting Undersecretary For Vague MAGA Priorities finally came due. U.S. District Judge Nicholas Garaufis ruled that Acting Secretary of Homeland Security Chad Wolf was unlawfully appointed. And because Wolf was never legitimately in charge of DHS, his attempts to curtail the Deferred Action for Child Arrivals program are a legal nullity.

Sad vuvuzela womp womp.

Presumably, the incoming Biden administration will make every effort to restore the program which allows undocumented persons brought here as children to work and travel without risk of deportation. But since this is a legal blog, it’s worth going into exactly how this decision came about.

Spoiler Alert: It wasn’t because of excellent lawyering by DHS.

As Judge Garaufis noted, Trump has admitted using his ability to nominate officials temporarily to skirt the legal requirement for Senate confirmation of executive branch appointees, saying he was “in no hurry” to name permanent replacements for departed cabinet officials because “I have ‘acting.’ And my actings are doing really great. I sort of like ‘acting.’ It gives me more flexibility.”

As part of this “flexibility,” the administration relied on agency heads to modify the order of succession in their departments to suit the president’s whims. And so it was on April 7, 2019, when DHS Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen resigned her office at the president’s request. Trump immediately tweeted that Kevin McAleenan, then Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Patrol, would take over as acting secretary.

Except — plot twist! — there was an order of succession at DHS, and McAleenan wasn’t next in line. So Neilsen quickly un-resigned, signed a memo purporting to change the delegation rankings, and then quit again on April 10.

It’s a pattern familiar to anyone watching the Trump administration for the past four years. Step 1: You’re fired. Step 2: Sign a document so whichever odious cretin has captured the president’s wandering eye can replace you. Step 3: Mean tweets.

The problem was that there were two parallel orders of succession at DHS: one that governed in case of the Secretary’s death, resignation, or inability to perform the functions of office, and one that would become operative in the event of a disaster or catastrophic emergency. And Nielsen signed a document modifying the second one. Whoopsie!

On November 8, 2019, McAleenan signed another order purporting to modify the DHS’s order of succession making Chad Wolf the second-in-line. Then on November 13, McAleenan got the boot after taking heavy fire from Trump’s anti-immigrant allies for his failure to support ICE raids on families who had no previous involvement with law enforcement.

Multiple plaintiffs sued on the grounds that McAleenan never had legal authority and thus had no ability to delegate it to Wolf. The parties in the instant case challenged Wolf’s authority to cut off new DACA applications, bar foreign travel by participants, and require annual renewal of permits, which he did in a July 28, 2020 memo after the Supreme Court blocked the Trump administration’s effort to cancel the program in its entirety for violating the Administrative Procedures Act.

The Government Accountability Office issued a report on August 14, 2020 validating the plaintiffs’ position that McAleenan and Wolf had been unlawfully appointed, to which DHS responded in a bonkers letter accusing the GAO of partisanship in the lead up to the election.

But Judge Garaufis agreed entirely with the GAO’s analysis, and was unpersuaded by testimony from DHS counsel that what Neilsen meant to say was that she modified all the agency’s succession orders.

“Based on the plain text of the operative order of succession, neither Mr. McAleenan nor, in turn, Mr. Wolf, possessed statutory authority to serve as acting secretary,” the court held. “Therefore, the Wolf Memorandum was not an exercise of legal authority.”

Although DHS heaped scorn on the GAO and insisted that the delegation was totally kosher because Nielsen had sworn in McAleenan herself, the agency did take some steps to repair the damage back in the fall. On September 10, 2020, FEMA Administrator Peter Gaynor purported to exercise “any authority vested in me as Acting Secretary of Homeland Security” to create a new order of succession retroactively elevating Wolf, and Wolf himself issued a “Ratification of Actions Taken” on September 18 to bless all his prior orders.

But Judge Garaufis was unimpressed. “[A]lthough Litigants can make arguments in the alternative, the court is not aware of any authority that would allow a government official to take administrative action in the alternative,” he observed dryly, noting later that, “Even if Administrator Gaynor should be Acting Secretary, DHS cannot recognize his authority only for the sham purpose of abdicating his authority to DHS’s preferred choice, and only in the alternative.”

There’s also some choice throat clearing in a footnote about the reliability of the representations the government made to the court about Gaynor’s attempted delegation:

Because the court finds that the Gaynor Order had no legal effect, it does not find it significant that Government is now confused as to whether the order was issued after Mr. Wolf was nominated to be Secretary on September 10, 2020 — as it originally claimed that — or before. (See Defs.’ Letter of November 13, 2020 (Dkt. 341).) The court wishes the Government well in trying to find its way out of this self-made thicket.

Woof.

The practical effect of this decision is probably minimal. The plaintiffs won class certification, but the incoming Biden administration will likely resume taking applications for DACA and allowing recipients to travel without losing eligibility, mooting the case. But it is a fitting coda to four years of deliberate flouting of the Senate confirmation process that the Trump administration’s attempt to gut protections for immigrant kids died because these people couldn’t get it together to revoke the law properly, and then their efforts to kneecap it failed because there was no one in charge at DHS.

Saved by lousy drafting!

Memorandum & Order [Batalla v. Wolf, No. 1:16-cv-04756-NGG-VMS (E.D.N.Y. Nov. 14, 2020)]


Elizabeth Dye lives in Baltimore where she writes about law and politics.

Awwww Hell Yeah It’s On

Game On: Enter Now To Win A Spot In ABA TECHSHOW’s 2021 Startup Alley

Attention legal technology startups: Here is your chance to compete to be featured as a presenter and exhibitor in the fifth-annual — and first virtual — Startup Alley at ABA TECHSHOW, the American Bar Association’s annual legal technology conference, to be held virtually on March 8-12, 2021. 

Today officially kicks off the call for entries for Startup Alley, in which 15 startups will be selected to participate in a virtual pitch competition that will be the opening event of this year’s TECHSHOW. In addition to the pitch competition, the 15 finalists will be highlighted on a special Startup Alley section of the conference website. 

Again this year, I will be coordinating the competition, in collaboration with the TECHSHOW board. Read on for full details. 

How Will The Startups Be Selected? 

The competition starts today. Startups interested in participating must complete this application form. Applications must be received by midnight Pacific Time on Friday, Dec. 18, 2020.

From all applications received, a panel of five judges will select 25 finalists. This year’s judges are:

  • Allan MacKenzie, TECHSHOW 2021 co-chair.
  • Roberta Tepper, TECHSHOW 2021 co-chair.
  • Ivan Hemmans, TECHSHOW 2021 co-vice-chair.
  • Brooke Moore, TECHSHOW 2021 co-vice-chair.
  • Bob Ambrogi, Startup Alley organizer. 

On Jan. 4, 2021, brief descriptions of each of the 25 finalists will be posted on the ABA TECHSHOW blog, Above the Law, and LawSites, and readers will be invited to vote for their favorites. The 15 startups with the most votes will be selected for Startup Alley. Winners will be announced on Jan. 25. 

What Are The Criteria For Applying?

The competition is limited to startups that meet the following criteria:

  • Your product or service is targeted to lawyers or legal professionals, not to consumers.
  • Your company has never before exhibited at a national legal technology conference.
  • Your company has achieved some demonstrable traction, either in users or financing.
  • You were not one of the prior years’ winners selected to present at TECHSHOW in the 2017, 2018, 2019 or 2020 Startup Alley.

In addition, your company should be innovative, meaning that it addresses a need not met by other products or services currently on the market or that it does so in a way not currently done by others.

What Happens If My Company Is Selected?

The 15 winning finalists will face off in a virtual pitch competition on March 8, 2021, that will be the opening event for TECHSHOW 2021. Each startup will have 2.5 minutes to present its pitch in front of a virtual audience of TECHSHOW attendees. At the conclusion of the pitches, attendees will vote to select the most innovative company as the winner.

For this year’s competition, participants will be required to pre-record their 2.5 minute presentations. One person from each startup will also be allowed to present 30 seconds of live remarks. 

In addition to the pitch competition, the 15 finalists will be highlighted on a special Startup Alley section of the conference website. 

What Do I Get Out Of This? 

ABA TECHSHOW is one of the world’s pre-eminent legal technology conferences. All of the participants gain exposure to a large and diverse audience of legal professionals, including practitioners, academics, consultants and others. In addition, TECHSHOW’s audience includes legal journalists, bloggers, industry analysts and investors.

In addition, the winner of the opening night pitch competition will receive:

  • Free 10×10 booth space at the 2022 TECHSHOW (or online equivalent if a live event is not possible).
  • Free 12-month listing on the ABA Legal Technology Resource Center’s Buyer’s Guide.
  • $5,000 credit to use toward advertising in ABA Law Practice Division media.
  • A profile of the company on my LawSites blog.

There is no cost to apply and the application form is relatively painless to complete. We look forward to reading your submission.


Robert Ambrogi is a Massachusetts lawyer and journalist who has been covering legal technology and the web for more than 20 years, primarily through his blog LawSites.com. Former editor-in-chief of several legal newspapers, he is a fellow of the College of Law Practice Management and an inaugural Fastcase 50 honoree. He can be reached by email at ambrogi@gmail.com, and you can follow him on Twitter (@BobAmbrogi).

Trump Official Who Won’t Admit Biden Won Looking For A New Job For 2021

Emily Murphy spent most of her tenure with the administration protecting Donald Trump’s financial holdings with bureaucratic shenanigans that landed her in a few congressional inquiries but mostly allowed her to operate in relative obscurity. That all changed when Murphy burst into the spotlight last week as the government official responsible for authorize the transition to the Biden administration, a task that she cynically and improperly refused to perform.

If seems as though she failed to fully appreciate the notoriety that comes with holding up a pandemic response during a national catastrophe. Because Murphy reportedly started the process of getting her resume out there for when her job ends in a couple of months, all while pretending her job is going to last another four years.

From ABC:

Emily Murphy, head of the GSA, recently sent that message to an associate inquiring about employment opportunities in 2021, a move that some in Washington interpreted as at least tacitly acknowledging that the current administration soon will be gone.

Looking for a job while acting as the public face of “we don’t need new jobs”… bravo. ABC secured a statement from GSA denying that Murphy was actually looking for work in one breath before explaining that it wouldn’t necessarily mean that Murphy expected her job to be over even if she were looking.

Honestly, when this administration is over it’s the blatant incompetence that will stick with me. The “gang that can’t shoot straight” approach to government was truly a sight to behold.

Maybe she can get a job with Jones Day… because they may have some high-profile openings before this is all said and done.

GSA official blocking Biden’s transition appears to privately plan post-Trump career [ABC News]

Earlier: The T14 GOP Lawyer Single-Handedly Holding Up The Joe Biden Transition


HeadshotJoe Patrice is a senior editor at Above the Law and co-host of Thinking Like A Lawyer. Feel free to email any tips, questions, or comments. Follow him on Twitter if you’re interested in law, politics, and a healthy dose of college sports news. Joe also serves as a Managing Director at RPN Executive Search.

Preparing For 2021 Legal Real Estate Trends

As the COVID-19 pandemic continues to force a large portion of the workforce to work from home for the foreseeable future, and retail spaces are under pressure due to weakened demand, the real estate market continues to bear the brunt of this drastic acceleration in remote working and e-commerce, creating uncertainty and risk for 2021.

Attend this webinar on November 18th at 1 p.m. ET / 10 a.m. PT and learn from two real estate experts who will share their perspectives on how the pandemic is accelerating real estate trends and how to prepare to respond to these trends.

You will discover:

  • How real estate trends will impact 2021
  • Various approaches to consider when responding to current challenges
  • Actions to take in Q4 to get ahead of these trends

Panelists:
Dustin Sarnoski, Global Head of Real Estate, State Street
John Skowronski, Real Estate Lawyer, Axiom
Sara Morgan, Vice President of Sales, Financial Services, Axiom

By submitting the form below, you are opting in to receive communication from Above the Law and its partners.