PACER Makes Ironic Decision To Block Access To Led Zeppelin Opinion

(Image via Getty)

The Ninth Circuit just handed Led Zeppelin a big win in the Stairway to Heaven copyright dispute. An earlier panel decision ordered a new trial, but the en banc ruling tossed that idea, junking the inverse ratio rule in the process.

But then PACER, who is definitely not having a great year, apparently blocked access to the opinion. Which is… ironic?

This is why we pay 10 cents a page!


HeadshotJoe Patrice is a senior editor at Above the Law and co-host of Thinking Like A Lawyer. Feel free to email any tips, questions, or comments. Follow him on Twitter if you’re interested in law, politics, and a healthy dose of college sports news. Joe also serves as a Managing Director at RPN Executive Search.

Michael Flynn Thinks He’s Going To Take On Covington & Burling? REALLY?

Michael Flynn (Photo by the Defense Department via Wikimedia)

Michael Flynn will prove that he never did lie to the FBI if it’s the last thing he does! Sure they’ve got him on tape talking to the Russian ambassador about sanctions, then denying it when asked by those mean FBI agents. Yes, he did admit to it in his plea deal two years ago. And, okay, fine, he also allocuted to it under oath. TWICE.

But that was all because those rascals at his former law firm, a little mom-and-pop shop called Covington & Burling, gave him bad advice. So now he’d like to withdraw his plea based on ineffective assistance of counsel. And if that doesn’t work, maybe he’ll plead insanity.

On Friday, Flynn and the government filed a joint stipulation in which Flynn agreed to waive attorney-client privilege and allow prosecutors to interview Covington about Flynn’s ineffective counsel claims. It should be noted that U.S. District Judge Emmet Sullivan has gotten a mite tetchy in the past when Flynn tried to deflect blame onto other people. But this time will be different, according to his new lawyer Sidney Powell, the only person in America who tweets more than Donald Trump.

If Flynn actually succeeds in withdrawing this plea, prosecutors will be free to use all of his statements to the FBI, including his proffer sessions, against him. And, although he wasn’t formally charged with it, Flynn admitted to violating the Foreign Agents Registration Act by failing to register his work for the Turkish government, both in his plea agreement and in testimony to the grand jury. Taken in this light, waiving the privilege and going to war with his former lawyers is probably not the dumbest thing Flynn’s ever done. But it ain’t exactly smart.

Those Covington guys gotta be shakin’ in their white shoes. Or maybe … not.

U.S. v. Flynn, Joint Notice of Filing [No. 1:17-cr-00232-1 (D.D.C. Mar 6, 2020)]


Elizabeth Dye lives in Baltimore where she writes about law and politics.

Who Was The 2019 Lawyer Of The Year?

Somewhere amid the world falling apart and being a little understaffed at Above the Law, we realize we never put out our annual “Lawyer of the Year” contest. So, like the Oscars, we’ll crown the best of 2019 several weeks into 2020.

For the unfamiliar, this honor functions a lot like Time’s Person of the Year, recognizing the most newsworthy attorney of 2019. There can be good attention or bad attention, but this is about the attorney who most dominated the headlines in 2019. And, yes, we do mean the Above the Law headlines, so there’s a bit of a skew toward the lawyers who made us laugh.

Without further ado, here are the nominees:

Rudy Giuliani: He kicked off the year worrying about how often he’d been caught lying for Trump and trying to insert himself into the impeachment inquiry. By the end of the year, Rudy had transitioned to the role of client, coming under increasing scrutiny with his old cronies starting to sing to prosecutors. Few attorneys were as reliable for an Above the Law forehead-smacking headline last year — a real achievement no matter how this all turns out.

“Bowl Of Dicks” Guy: Depositions can be frustrating. One attorney told the world how he felt about them and found himself the subject of an ex parte motion for relief. Christopher Hook may not have had the whole-year staying power of Giuliani, but he lit up our lives with “Fuck you crooks, eat a bowl of dicks” and “I’m going to let the long dick of the law fuck Allstate for all of us.”

Michael Avenatti: We’ve never had a back-to-back Lawyer of the Year, but Avenatti made a case for himself. In 2018, Avenatti was everywhere, challenging the White House, bringing down Michael Cohen, toying with a presidential run… the guy owned that year. In 2019, his fortunes took a dramatic turn with multiple indictments, an arrest, a trip to solitary, and a conviction.

Pam Karlan: The Stanford Law professor and former DOJ official delivered a bravura performance at the impeachment hearings, prompting arguably the most bizarre faux outrage of the year when right-wingers decided saying Trump couldn’t give his children titles of nobility was an egregious assault on his child. It was a controversy that still I’m still not sure wasn’t a fever dream.

Alan Dershowitz: What didn’t Dershowitz do in 2019? He demanded those accusing him of being involved with Jeffrey Epstein’s sex trafficking efforts sue him for defamation. So they did. Then he defended Epstein’s slap on the wrist deal in a bid to enter the Hot Take Hall of Fame. Then Boies sued him. And while the impeachment trial didn’t happen until 2020, Dershowitz managed to get himself front and center on it through the latter half of 2019.

Honorable Mentions: We also got some nominees submitted who don’t really fit the “dominant newsmaker” parameters, but we thought deserved a quick shout-out nonetheless.

Matthew Dowd: From working with Judge Posner and David Boies on a major pro se battle to litigating John Steinbeck’s legacy, Dowd had an eventful year being a real lawyer. And yet his professionalism meant he largely stays out of the limelight.

Michelle Browning Coughlin: The founder of MothersEsquire and partner at Wyatt Tarrant & Combs is working hard to make sure that continuances for parental leave become mandatory and that courthouses across the country provide adequate accomodations for breastfeeding mothers. She also published My Mom, the Lawyer in late 2019.

So, vote for who should be Lawyer of the Year. Polls will stay open until Sunday, March 15, at 11:59 p.m. Eastern.

Loading ... Loading …

HeadshotJoe Patrice is a senior editor at Above the Law and co-host of Thinking Like A Lawyer. Feel free to email any tips, questions, or comments. Follow him on Twitter if you’re interested in law, politics, and a healthy dose of college sports news. Joe also serves as a Managing Director at RPN Executive Search.

5 Reasons Why In-House Departments Offer A Glimpse Of Hope For The Future Of Law

In-house legal departments have been making significant strides in legal innovation. In a field that has led society in innovations, in-house departments have been at the forefront. While there are numerous explanations for why in-house departments lead innovation and the future of law, five, in particular, stand out.

In-House Lawyers Are Rarely The Show

Only rarely are the in-house lawyers a company’s main feature. Often, they play a supporting role, just a small part of the much bigger show.  As a result, they are by nature nimbler, attuned to demands of others, and collaborative. The in-house lawyers must follow the show. They must enable and support it. And most importantly, they must not impede it.

Billable Hour Legacy Is Rare

The legacy of a billable hour does not impede progress. Unlike at law firms, there is no pressure on law departments to figure out how they will make money if a technology or process stalls significantly. Based on my informal, highly unscientific survey, numerous innovators had to rethink their offering and business models to a law firm because it questioned the imperial infallibility of the billable hours and the institutions they support.

Very Close Ties To The Business

The in-house departments are very close to the business. They are on many calls and in numerous meetings. The members of the in-house departments often socialize with the rest of the company in the regular flow of formal and informal events. And finally, they are united to meet the company’s goals and targets. Together they celebrate successes, reflect on misses, and live the consequences of what happens. That is why in-house departments are more likely to keep with the business trends such as increased collaboration, enterprise-wide automation, diminishing hierarchal structure, widespread digitization, increased transparency, and numerous others.

Inflow Of Other Professionals

I recently asked many in-house legal operators how they joined the field and emerged as leaders in the space. Many of the legal operators I spoke to had numerous and diverse paths that may not have included adventures in law in the past. Many had competencies in finance, business, or technology. Some came from the military and other less traditional backgrounds. As a result of the inflow of other professionals into law, legal departments tend to normalize quicker and more likely to cross-pollinate with the ideas across the enterprise.

Constant Reality Checks

Finally, to be part of a business is to constantly benchmark against competitors and react to external events, such as the state of the economy, influence of elections, emergence of national disasters, social media trends, and, most recently, the spread of a virus. These close ties to the world put constant pressure on in-house departments to provide legal services cheaper, faster, and more effectively. Thus, they also tend to be more open-minded and okay with experimenting and change.

Just by their nature, in-house legal professionals are predisposed to innovate within their companies. It’s no surprise, then, that they are leading the charge in the legal industry. From diverse backgrounds, legal operators play key supporting roles while working closely with their business and in conversation with external realities. As the field continues to innovate, look to the work of legal operators to predict what might come next.


Olga V. Mack is the CEO of Parley Pro, a next-generation contract management company that has pioneered online negotiation technology. Olga embraces legal innovation and had dedicated her career to improving and shaping the future of law. She is convinced that the legal profession will emerge even stronger, more resilient, and more inclusive than before by embracing technology.  Olga is also an award-winning general counsel, operations professional, startup advisor, public speaker, adjunct professor, and entrepreneur. She founded the Women Serve on Boards movement that advocates for women to participate on corporate boards of Fortune 500 companies. She authored Get on Board: Earning Your Ticket to a Corporate Board Seat and Fundamentals of Smart Contract Security. You can follow Olga on Twitter @olgavmack.  

Inspiring Fitspo From Ruth Bader Ginsburg

(Original photo by MANDEL NGAN/AFP/Getty Images)

My mantra for the justice is to “just show up.” When it comes to working out, showing up is part of the battle. The Justice always shows up for training and gives it her very best. One time, she told me she left a White House dinner early to make it to our training session.

Bryant Johnson, who serves as Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s personal trainer, sharing the fitness mantra that’s helped everyone’s favorite justice remain notorious in the gym. Ginsburg is almost 87 years old, but she can probably do more push-ups than you.


Staci ZaretskyStaci Zaretsky is a senior editor at Above the Law, where she’s worked since 2011. She’d love to hear from you, so please feel free to email her with any tips, questions, comments, or critiques. You can follow her on Twitter or connect with her on LinkedIn.

How Useful Is A Prison Consultant To Harvey Weinstein

Harvey Weinstein is set to be sentenced this Wednesday following his conviction for Rape in the Third Degree and Criminal Sexual Act (unconsented oral sex.)

For a guy like Weinstein, who spent the entirety of his case under house arrest and rarely passed a moment of his adult life in a place he didn’t want to be, this will be a huge change.

Many people facing prison hear the down-low of what prison’s like from relatives, friends, and neighbors. Although they’re still nervous about it, at least they have some real sense of what to expect and how to survive. Some people even get “props” for being “in.” It ups their public image, helps sell their music, reputation, or brand. Not so for Harvey Weinstein. I’m guessing he’s scared to death. He’s probably seen a lot of movies (and maybe even produced some) about what happens in jail to guys accused of sex crimes, especially ones with money.

Weinstein’s facing a minimum state sentence of five years, but it could run as high as 25. He’ll be given a fixed number of years on each crime that will likely run consecutively, one after the other, since they involved separate incidents and separate complainants. Plus, Judge Burke is not a light sentencer, and the eyes of the world are upon him.

To get a better sense of how best to face this uncertain future, Weinstein added prison consultant Craig Rothfeld, a former Wall Street exec found guilty of securities fraud who spent time in an upstate prison, to his already robust defense team. Rothfeld cleverly parlayed his experience into a consulting biz advising future inmates and their families how best to tackle the many issues that arise when locked up 24/7 with a lot of dangerous guys who hate your guts or want your money.

This is not a new business. Books like “Surviving and Thriving in Prison” (about federal prison time) have been written and, judged by the customer reviews, appreciated by the relevant audience. But state prison’s a hybrid, especially in New York, where there are over 52 correctional facilities. Each one has its own quirks, feel, bosses, wardens, and subset of inmates. It’s hard to write a template about the whole system.

Certain basics, however, are universal. The first is a complete loss of control and power. Then there’s the dehumanization. The inmate becomes a number, a “body” which must be housed, fed, cleaned, and counted. Finally, there’s unending boredom tinged with paranoia. Every day is the same — wake at the same time, move at the same time, and maybe get library or religious privileges on occasion. The lucky ones are awarded basic jobs like cleaning the floors, doing the laundry, or working in the kitchen. Controls are enforced on who inmates call, write, and have as visitors. Mix this with the fear that an attack could come at any moment from other inmates and even a few years in prison can seem like an eternity.

Solitary confinement keeps inmates from the fray of “general population,” but it brings a greater burden of boredom, isolation, activity restriction, and loss of privacy (guards check in more often).

Being well known brings its own burdens. If other detainees know you’re rich, they’ll expect more from you. Although Bill Cosby turned his fame to his favor. I’ve read he’s been using his jail time to mentor young inmates and to get in better shape. He reportedly entered prison at 220 pounds and has peeled down to a healthier 189.

But Cosby had a much different standing in the outside world than Weinstein. He was widely known, was popular, and was (and probably still is) funny.

None of those things are true for Weinstein.

Prison consultant Rothfeld will coach Weinstein on how to not argue about the television remote with the big guy from down the hall, how it’s not a good idea to gamble, and what to expect in the first 90 days.

But really, it’s a go-it-alone process. And there’s no telling what experiences an inmate might confront within those confines.

Weinstein’s appeal motion, even if successful, will take years to perfect, and he’ll spend those years inside. In part how he does is up to him. In part it will depend upon the vagaries of a regimented system filled with randomness — who the guy in the next cell is, who the warden is, who wants a piece of him the most.

The man who controlled a chunk of the money in Hollywood will be lucky to control any aspect of his own fate.


Toni Messina has tried over 100 cases and has been practicing criminal law and immigration since 1990. You can follow her on Twitter: @tonitamess.

Am Law 50 Firm Demands Massive Tax Breaks, Sues Government For Not Handing Them Over

In defense of Dechert, they’re doing exactly what crafty lawyers eyeing a loophole should be doing.

The Am Law 50 firm moved its headquarters to Philadelphia’s Cira Centre in 2005, taking advantage of a tax break program that Pennsylvania offers businesses to move into developments in formerly run-down areas. Since taking up residence in Cira Centre, Dechert’s paid virtually no state or local business taxes in exchange for Dechert’s role in making the area an attractive business destination.

But the program expired in 2018, so when the Keystone Opportunity Zone program eyed a new tax-free area in Schuylkill Yards, Dechert walked up and asked to move there too.

There’s nothing in the law to say companies can’t hop from zone to zone to remain permanently tax-free, and when authorities denied Dechert’s request to continue not paying its taxes, the firm took the government to court.

On the one hand, by moving to the new location, Dechert’s asking to be rewarded for bailing on the first opportunity zone. On the other hand, Dechert’s right that the law doesn’t account for the stopping businesses from “zone hopping” and Dechert’s attorneys argue that Dechert’s already done its job and that Cira Centre can now fill its potential Dechert-sized vacancy with any number of willing tenants who won’t mind paying their taxes. They feel the firm should be rewarded for volunteering to march into a new frontier a second time.

These stadium deal-style tax breaks have a pretty bad record for the cities when all is said and done, but states keep doing them, one of the many “race to the bottom” side effects of Federalism in the modern age where entities can play state governments off each other. At one point there was a concerted effort to force the businesses taking these tax breaks to aid in the development of the neighborhood — not so much anymore. From the Inquirer:

Originally a company had to either boost employment by 20% or invest at least 10% of its total revenue from the previous year. The new way to qualify just required a company to sign a lease covering the duration of the zone and to spend at least 5% of the previous year’s revenue on rent.

Much like the much-publicized Amazon headquarters deal in New York, the logic is that increased taxes on wages will pay for the business tax cuts. During the run of the deal, Dechert reduced headcount from 700 in 2005 to 461 last year.

But that’s surely going to totally turn around with these new tax breaks!

One of Philadelphia’s richest law firms wants tax breaks, again. Why it might get its way. [Philadelphia Inquirer]


HeadshotJoe Patrice is a senior editor at Above the Law and co-host of Thinking Like A Lawyer. Feel free to email any tips, questions, or comments. Follow him on Twitter if you’re interested in law, politics, and a healthy dose of college sports news. Joe also serves as a Managing Director at RPN Executive Search.

Wells Fargo Pinned Hopes For Mercy On Racist, Was Disappointed

T14 Law School Cancels Classes Due To Coronavirus Outbreak

(Image via Getty)

Coronavirus continues to hit too close to home for the legal community. Lawyers and law students alike have had brushes with COVID-19, which has led to both law firm and law school closures, with numerous people forced into quarantine.

In Seattle, Washington, a coronavirus hot spot, Washington Law has been forced to move all of its classes to an online format for the rest of the quarter. In New York alone, the second person in the state who tested positive for the illness was a lawyer, and that diagnosis reverberated throughout the city. Thus far, a student at Cardozo Law went into self-quarantine after contact with the lawyer’s firm and New York Law School closed its doors for extensive cleaning due to another student’s contact with that lawyer’s firm. Most recently, Quinn Emanuel shuttered its New York office and moved to a work-from-home structure after one of its partner tested positive for coronavirus.

Today, three more New York-area law schools have decided to close their doors.

The following message can be found on Columbia Law’s website homepage:

ALERT: Suspension of Classes: Because a member of the Columbia community has been quarantined as a result of exposure to the coronavirus (COVID-19), classes are suspended on Monday, March 9 and Tuesday, March 10. This suspension of activities will allow for preparation to shift to remote classes for the remainder of the week.

Students at the highly competitive T14 law school will receive a nice little two-day break before their classes resume in an online format. Students at this elite law school aren’t the only ones who are being affected by a coronavirus closure thus week.

Hofstra Law’s posted the following message on its website homepage:

In an abundance of caution, Hofstra University is cancelling in-person classes for the upcoming week, beginning on Monday 3/9, with Spring Break for main campus undergraduate and graduate classes beginning as scheduled on Saturday, March 14. All class work will be made up and a new schedule will be announced soon.

What does this mean for the school’s law student population? Have people with online classes this week gotten the short end of the stick? Will the new schedule eat into the school’s upcoming spring break, which is currently scheduled to begin on March 30? Will the school be forced to use its one snow/make-up day to fulfill its teaching obligations for this semester? These are all difficult questions that the law school administration must answer, but thankfully students are being kept safe.

UPDATE (12:25 p.m.): Minutes after this story was published, Fordham Law announced that its campus would be closing due to coronafirus fears. Like Columbia, Fordham will suspend in-person classes after 1 p.m. today through March 10, and then will carry on with online classes for an indefinite period of time until further notice. A student at the law school reports that they “haven’t heard anything about how classes are going to be conducted yet.”

What is your law school doing to protect students and faculty from coronavirus? Please text us (646-820-8477) or email us (subject line: “Coronavirus Response”).

Alert [Columbia Law School]
Update on COVID-19 and Class Activity [Columbia | Preparedness]
Campus Notification [Hofstra Law School]
Campus Alerts [Hostra University]
Coronavirus Updates [Fordham University]


Staci ZaretskyStaci Zaretsky is a senior editor at Above the Law, where she’s worked since 2011. She’d love to hear from you, so please feel free to email her with any tips, questions, comments, or critiques. You can follow her on Twitter or connect with her on LinkedIn.

The Virus That Is Shutting Down Legal — No, Not That One

There is a virus spreading through the legal community, causing law firms and law-related companies to shut down. While careful hygiene could help prevent its spread, the virus I’m talking about is not the one that is dominating the headlines.

Rather, what I’m talking about is ransomware. On Feb. 29, a ransomware attack took down the international e-discovery and managed services company Epiq Global, leaving customers unable to access their data or work on e-discovery review projects they had underway.

As of Saturday, the company said it was still working to bring its systems online. The incident affected a range of law-related businesses within Epiq, including its e-discovery and document review, class action and mass tort, and restructuring and bankruptcy businesses.

Meanwhile, a spate of ransomware attacks have hit law firms, shutting down their operations and posting portions of stolen client data online to get them to pay the ransom. In one 24-hour period last month, three law firms were hit. An attack against a nationwide disability firm resulted in veterans’ records posted online.

As of this morning, I checked several ransomware sites and found multiple instances that purport to have locked law firm data and posted some of it online. These are not so-called “dark web” sites — they are available on the open internet.

Ransomware is not the kind of virus typically associated with the malware that attacks computers. Viruses infect a particular program and then have the ability to propagate within a computer system, causing effects of varying severity.

By contrast, ransomware uses a technique called cryptoviral extortion, which means it encrypts all the files on a computer or system and then demands payment of a ransom to decrypt them and allow you to recover your files.

One of the most common ways ransomware can get access to a computer is through email phishing – an attachment to an email that appears to be a file the recipient should trust, but that in fact contains malware.

A recent Experian study of companies across industries found that 36% reported having had a ransomware attack last year, with only 20% confident of their ability to deal with such an attack.

But Brett Callow, a threat analyst with Emsisoft, a cybersecurity company that is also an associate partner in the No More Ransom Project, an initiative between multiple law enforcement agencies and the private sector, said a major concern is companies not reporting or disclosing ransomware attacks.

Delays in notifying customers that their data may have been breached can give criminals time to hit unsuspecting third parties with spear-phishing attacks and other forms of fraud, he says.

“Folks’ tax returns and veterans’ PTSD claims are being posted online, and these people have no clue that they’re sitting ducks for identity thieves because the companies haven’t told them,” Callow says. “Similarly, I suspect that the groups are using the stolen data to spear phish other companies.”

Yet as the headlines are dominated by news of the coronavirus, there are parallels between that crisis and the rise in ransomware attacks.

“The two have something in connection, in that they shed light on the need for good hygiene in general, and good cyber-hygiene in particular,” said David Carns, a former technology consultant to law firms who is now chief revenue officer at Casepoint. “No system is immune from attack, but there are best practices that people can employ to improve one’s chances of good health.”

With regard to shopping for vendors of legal products and services, law firms should look carefully at their security policies, Carns says. Too often, companies cite their data center’s security ratings as evidence of their own — but security policies must apply also at the company level and even down to the file level.

As the Epiq incident demonstrates, it takes just one successful phishing attack to take down an entire network. For that reason, Carns said, companies need to emphasize regular and company-wide security training for all employees.

He also suggested that companies compartmentalize their data, so if an employee’s lack of diligence opens the door to an attack, it does not infect the entire system.

As for law firms, there are a number of measures they can take to help guard against a ransomware attack. But the most important may be educating staff. Ensure that they know how to protect client documents through encryption and other means. And teach them never to open attachments from unknown senders.

Safe email practices are to ransomware what hand washing is to coronavirus. A bit of hygiene goes a long way toward prevention.


Robert Ambrogi is a Massachusetts lawyer and journalist who has been covering legal technology and the web for more than 20 years, primarily through his blog LawSites.com. Former editor-in-chief of several legal newspapers, he is a fellow of the College of Law Practice Management and an inaugural Fastcase 50 honoree. He can be reached by email at ambrogi@gmail.com, and you can follow him on Twitter (@BobAmbrogi).