With mass gatherings off the table for the time being, how can the profession continue to network in large numbers? When legal technology trade shows were canceled, Rocket Matter CEO Larry Port put together a two-day virtual conference offering COVID-centric practice insights and CLE for over 300 registrants — with proceeds going to charity. Joe and Larry talk about the process of putting together the Rocket Aid show and the dos and don’ts of running a large online event that Larry’s learned from this experience.
2019 Was A Rough Year For This Biglaw Firm
Ed. Note: Welcome to our daily feature Trivia Question of the Day!
According to data collected by ALM for the 2020 Am Law 100 ranking, which Biglaw firm saw gross revenue fall the greatest percentage in 2019?
Hint: The firm went down 5.9 percent in gross revenue, landing it in the 95th spot overall with $398,000,000 in gross revenue.
See the answer on the next page.
Mini-Mercer Building Mini-Breitbart In Mini-Bid To Reelect Trump, Start War With China
It’s safe to say that not everyone at Renaissance Technologies agreed with former co-CEO Robert Mercer’s politics and successful support for Donald Trump’s successful presidential ambitions. But it’s also safe to say that Mercer was not alone in said enthusiasms in East Setauket. Indeed, coinciding with Mercer’s own return from semi–political reclusion following his exit from RenTech, we find one of his former protégés attempting, on a more modest scale undoubtedly reflective of his more modest Medallion investments, to replicate Mercer’s efforts to build a right-wing media empire. And while we can’t say for sure whether Huayi Zhang shares Mercer’s (alleged) beliefs on the separation of the races and the curative value of piss, he sure hates the Chinese Communist Party every bit as much, and has some other eccentricities of his own.
A tax document not intended for public disclosure reveals that a branch of the Epoch Media Group — a conservative media empire controlled by Falun Gong, a Chinese spiritual movement with a stated goal of destroying the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) — received over $900,000 from and was formerly led by one of Mercer’s longtime employees, Huayi Zhang, at the hedge fund Renaissance Technologies…. Epoch has expanded outside of its hawkish anti-Beijing editorial line, emerging as one of the most prolific pro-Trump media outlets….
Huayi and Siuling Zhang, contributed $909,500 to New Tang Dynasty between 2012 and 2016. Zhang also served as chair of the organization’s board in 2004, 2005 and 2007 to 2010. He was listed as a director in 2006…. Huayi Zhang also listed Renaissance Technologies as his employer in campaign contributions, suggesting he was still an employee at the fund until at least 2018….
There is no evidence that Zhang and Mercer, through their shared affiliation with Renaissance Technologies and their respective affiliations with right-wing media outlets Epoch Media and Breitbart, coordinated their efforts to drive a hawkishly anti-Beijing agenda and develop two of the most proflific pro-Trump megaphones on the Internet.
Kyle Bass has found himself with some strange bedfellows, indeed.
The Hedge Fund Man Behind Pro-Trump Media’s New War on China [Daily Beast]
4 Best Practices For Biglaw Firms That Are Weathering The Storm Well
Based on recent headlines, a casual observer could conclude that Biglaw is in a state of meltdown — but that wouldn’t be correct. As I said in a recent interview with Bloomberg Law, although the legal industry currently faces “a time of uncertainty,” it’s “not in freefall.”
Take a closer look at the firms that have announced cost-cutting measures such as layoffs, furloughs, and compensation cuts. The roundups here at Above the Law and over at the American Lawyer list 76 and 70 firms, respectively. But a number of the mentioned firms are small firms, midsize firms, or even overseas entities. If you exclude those firms, you’re probably talking about, at most, a third of the Am Law 200.
The fact that most Am Law 200 firms have not had to implement any cost-cutting measures suggests that a significant number of Biglaw firms are weathering the current storm reasonably well. To be sure, the list of firms engaged in belt-tightening grows each week, and many analysts believe that we’re seeing only the tip of the iceberg. But it’s also worth noting that several firms feel comfortable enough with the condition of their coffers to announce to their employees that they will not be cutting salaries or conducting layoffs.
Now, these “no layoffs” assurances aren’t legally enforceable, and those of us who were around during the last recession can recall how some firms that made such promises wound up going back on them. But it’s safe to say that at least some firms will emerge from the current crisis relatively unscathed, as is the case with pretty much every downturn.
For firms that are in the fortunate position of holding up well, here are four recommendations for how to use the current crisis to enhance employee loyalty, burnish your firm’s reputation, and do the right thing:
1. Make gestures of generosity, if you can afford them.
These are trying times for many American families. And while households with at least one Biglaw lawyer or staff member are among the most fortunate, this doesn’t mean that they’re immune to economic difficulty.
Imagine a family of four where one parent is a Biglaw administrative assistant and the other parent just got laid off from a job as a restaurant manager. Or picture a family that’s a bit more privileged, a Biglaw associate married to a journalist who, while not laid off, just got hit with a pay cut. These families still have kids to support and bills to pay — and they could even have unanticipated new costs, such as medical bills related to coronavirus treatment.
They could use whatever help they can get from the firm. So kudos to those firms that have stepped up to the plate with such measures as bonuses to help out with unexpected expenses or technology stipends to help employees work more efficiently from home.
Even more modest measures go a long way in terms of increasing employee appreciation and loyalty. For example, some firms have sent meals or care packages to employees who they knew had, or had a family member who had, COVID-19. These gestures aren’t expensive, but they are deeply appreciated by those who receive them.
2. Be understanding and flexible regarding the challenges your employees face.
My colleagues and I speak to many associates in our roles as legal recruiters. These days, because lateral hiring of associates has slowed, many of our conversations are check-ins, as opposed to discussions about specific jobs.
I checked in recently with one associate who expressed some frustration about their firm. The firm seems to be doing well and hasn’t announced any austerity measures. But what this associate found frustrating is the firm’s acting as if it’s “business as usual” — when, for many associates, it’s not.
This associate is a working parent, and their spouse works as well. They have a young child and, because of the quarantine in New York, no child care. They’re both working remotely while also dealing with the added challenge of caring for their child, which means that getting work done is much harder than usual. It would be nice if the firm acknowledged the challenges that associates and staffers face right now — in terms of child care, elder care, or sick family members, to name a few — and reassured them that the current circumstances would be taken into account when evaluating performance.
For example, take the issue of billable hours. Should billable-hour requirements be waived or pro-rated to reflect the difficulty of accumulating billables while dealing with many other priorities? It’s an issue firms should start considering, even if the end of the year is still far away.
3. Communicate, communicate, communicate.
This point flows from the preceding one — and, unlike giving a tech stipend or pro-rating hours requirements, it costs a firm truly nothing. When in doubt, firms should communicate more rather than less; a little communication goes a long way.
Even during normal times, law firms have never gotten high marks for transparency. And in times of great uncertainty and anxiety for lawyers and staff, clear communications about where the firm stands and what its plans for the future are matter more than ever. We certainly know that associates at firms that have been more transparent greatly appreciate their firms’ honesty, openness, and reassurance.
4. Step up your pro bono game.
During difficult times like these, the need for pro bono work is greater than ever. And because of the slowness that at least some lawyers and practice areas are experiencing, many lawyers have more free time to spend on pro bono matters.
A number of firms have risen to the occasion. For example, some 34 law firms, including Kirkland & Ellis, Willkie Farr, Goodwin, and Covington, have joined together with the Lawyers for Good Government Foundation to help small business owners navigate the complexities of the federal government’s COVID-19 stimulus package (which isn’t easy to figure out, as explained in this client memo by Jesse Panuccio and Simon Leen of Boies Schiller). The small-business pro bono program got started here in New York City, where Kirkland & Ellis pro bono counsel Jacqueline Haberfeld and other law firm representatives approached the City Bar Justice Center with the idea.
As Brad Karp, chairman of Paul Weiss — a longtime leader in pro bono work, which in March launched an online Coronavirus Relief Center to help individuals and small businesses — put it in a recent Q&A with Law.com, “Millions of Americans face economic ruin; gratuitous actions by state and federal authorities put inmates, migrants and others at extreme risk; and our democratic institutions are being undermined. If we, as lawyers, don’t step up to safeguard the rule of law and those in need, who will?”
The answer should be: all law firms and lawyers. Yes, it’s important for law firms to look after and support their own people during these trying times. But it’s also critical for Biglaw firms, who are in a relatively privileged position compared to many other businesses and industries, to look beyond themselves and to help their communities and country.
At some point in time — hopefully sooner than later, although right now it’s anyone’s guess — the COVID-19 pandemic and its economic fallout will be behind us. If you’re a law firm leader, you’ll be asked, “What did you and your firm do during the crisis?” So take actions today that will allow you to answer this question with pride tomorrow.
David Lat, the founding editor of Above the Law, is a writer, speaker, and legal recruiter at Lateral Link, where he is a managing director in the New York office. David’s book, Supreme Ambitions: A Novel (2014), was described by the New York Times as “the most buzzed-about novel of the year” among legal elites. David previously worked as a federal prosecutor, a litigation associate at Wachtell Lipton, and a law clerk to Judge Diarmuid F. O’Scannlain of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. You can connect with David on Twitter (@DavidLat), LinkedIn, and Facebook, and you can reach him by email at dlat@laterallink.com.
Day 53: Musings On The Quarantine Of 2020
It is Day 53 of my quarantine. I do not know about you, but I have been cooped up at home for too long. It has officially passed into the ridiculous zone. Human beings were clearly never intended to live in isolation. I mean, I do not mind being alone at times — alone with my thoughts, on some intractable task, or listening to Miles Davis. But this is getting nutty.
And the trouble is that there is no real end in sight. I watch and listen to a lot of news (I mix it up a bit to ensure I’m getting the full panoply of information), but I have not yet heard a single medical expert unequivocally say that we are anywhere near being in the clear. Worse perhaps are the predictions for when it may be safe to gather in groups at distances closer than six feet.
Twelve months, folks. That is the best estimate I have heard. I hope that is wrong. You see, they still do not have a clue how widespread this damn virus is. At least not to any level of certainty. It has impacted different places in disparately different ways. Attribute it to testing, to the diverse ways and places in which we live, or to logistics and supply chain. You could make the argument that the government response to this whole thing has been largely inept, but really, what is the point? Government is not going to solve this problem. It is a question of time and of science. We are going to have to ride it out.
In the meantime, flowers are starting to bloom in the yard and the grass has started to grow. Spring is here. And I just realized that my lawn mower went on the fritz last winter. So, I will have to figure that one out.
And with the warmer weather, people are beginning to venture out. I have noticed an unprecedented number of people in my neighborhood walking, jogging, riding bikes, with and without dogs. Couples holding hands and trios yapping it up as they walk down the block. People seem to be much more friendly and amenable to a kind “hello” as they walk or ride by. Yesterday, a van with the name of a church on the side drove by with five or six masked people inside, all of whom were yelling blessings out the windows at anyone they saw. That was a first.
People have been baking lots of bread — one of my favorite foods — and there is a lot more cooking at home. I bet that people who have never made more than a drip cup of coffee have now learned some basic cooking skills. Maybe.
Lots of virtual stuff going on, too. Virtual happy hours, virtual conferences, virtual meetings, and virtual interviews. We are all just virtual, now. The pandemic is real, though. Real illness, real lives — and some real heroes, too.
I have been fortunate. I have not had a need to go out often. But when I do, I mask up, wear gloves, and bring my homemade hand sanitizer. It is a mix of alcohol and hand moisturizer to reduce the dryness. I try to limit contact by going during off-hours when I know people are sleeping or eating. Thank goodness that most things we need I have been able to pick up curbside. I actually wear a bandana. And let me just say, there is something incredibly liberating about walking into a retail establishment wearing a bandana and carrying a small spray bottle.
Quarantine started for me on March 12, the day I flew home from the ASU/Ipro Tech Show. We were on the law school campus in downtown Phoenix for two days. People hugged and shook hands and we gathered in rooms for session. It was not until I heard March Madness was canceled, then professional sports, that I became the least bit alarmed. And even though the virus had been the subject of news reports, there were not yet any stay at home orders. I tried to get an earlier flight out of Phoenix. Did not happen.
In the wake of my return home, while the virus began to ravage the East Coast, I woke up every day for the two weeks following the conference wondering if that day would be the day I would start showing symptoms. I still wonder. But I have been fortunate.
Because I work in the legal industry, the pain and anguish the pandemic has brought upon the profession has been real, too. Family, friends, and colleagues — all have been impacted in different ways — but very real, nonetheless.
I feel fortunate. But I am getting tired of the virtual world.
Mike Quartararo is the President of the Association of Certified E-Discovery Specialists (ACEDS), a professional member association providing training and certification in e-discovery. He is also the author of the 2016 book Project Management in Electronic Discovery and a consultant providing e-discovery, project management and legal technology advisory and training services to law firms and Fortune 500 corporations across the globe. You can reach him via email at mquartararo@aceds.org. Follow him on Twitter @mikequartararo.
Ohio Lawmaker Cannot Cover ‘God’s Image’ With Face Mask Because READ YOUR BIBLE, People!
Ohio State Rep. Nino Vitale is mad as hell, and he’s not going to take it anymore! He’s tired of all these liberals telling him how to live and talking about “public health”, and “bend the curve”, and “Hey, let’s do our very best not to kill Grandma, okay?”
“This is the greatest nation on earth founded on Judeo-Christian Principles,” the Urbana Republican wrote on his Facebook page. “One of those principles is that we are all created in the image and likeness of God. That image is seen the most by our face. I will not wear a mask.”
Vitale’s Facebook account was recently disabled after he posted disinformation on the coronavirus, but he’s back online now, and The Huffington Post reports that Vitale posted a video expanding on his sacred obligation for all Christians to appear in public bare-faced during a pandemic.
“When we think of image, do we think of a chest or our legs or our arms?” he asked. “We think of their face. I don’t want to cover people’s faces, Jim. That’s the image of God right there and I want to see it in my brothers and sisters.”
Sadly, Ohioans won’t get to hear Vitale flesh out his no doubt deeply considered and well grounded First Amendment argument against bog standard public health measures. On Sunday, Ohio’s Republican Governor Mike DeWine rescinded his order that face masks be worn in stores to prevent the spread of the novel coronavirus because so many of his constituents found the requirement “offensive.”
“It became clear to me that that was just a bridge too far. People were not going to accept the government telling them what to do,” DeWine told ABC’s “This Week.” Although he did suggest that it might be a nice gesture to wear one anyway, just to protect “the folks who are stocking shelves in grocery stores.”
Safe to say that Rep. Vitale will not be heeding that advice. After taking flack last week for calling the state’s Jewish public health chief Amy Acton the “unelected Globalist Health Director,” he was at it again yesterday, exhorting his Facebook followers to “ignore the unelected Dr. Acton’s orders, open your counties now, before it’s too late. This is not based on logic, this is based on fear and propaganda and every statistical, data driven study done in the last 2 weeks says death counts are low, the models were wrong, and this is more like the flu.”
Then he arglebargled some nonsense about public health measures requiring a two-thirds vote by the Ohio legislature and went back to shouting that Bill Gates “wants to lock us down and profit by charging us for mandatory vaccinations.”
Seems like it was possibly a bad idea to turn public health measures into another front in our never ending culture war? That maybe pretending that scientific experts were part of an evil cabal of globalist, socialist, communists trying to enslave Americans by not letting them die during a contagious pandemic was counterproductive?
Just kidding. LIBERATE OHIO, full steam ahead.
GOP Lawmaker Opposes Coronavirus Face Masks Because They Cover ‘The Image Of God’ [Huffington Post]
State rep. won’t wear mask because faces are the ‘likeness of God’ [Ohio Capital Journal]
Ohio State Rep. Nino Vitale Calls Dr. Amy Acton, Who is Jewish, a Globalist [Cleveland Scene]
Elizabeth Dye (@5DollarFeminist) lives in Baltimore where she writes about law and politics.
These Law Schools Prove They Have Staying Power
Good news for those of you using the quarantine to argue about esoteric differences in elite law schools — there are new law school rankings out!
Well, to be fair, these are updated rankings. Bradley A. Areheart, of the University of Tennessee College of Law, has engaged in this exercise before which involves creating a ranking of law schools based on their 10-year rolling average overall USNWR ranking. This is a great resource for those looking to see not just how a law school is doing right now, but how the law school have held up over time.
And for those of you who are sticklers for details, Areheart describes his methodology for dealing with ties: “If two law school’s 10-year rolling averages were within 1/10 of a point, I tied them and then attempted to break those ties based on the current year’s peer reputation scores. You’ll see that where there was a tie, I have included the peer rep scores in parentheses for those schools. If the peer rep scores were the same, I allowed the tie to remain.”
So, without further ado, here are the historical rankings of the top 30 law schools. (Check out the full ranking here.)
Rank | School | 10-Year Rank |
1 | Yale | 1.0 |
2 | Stanford | 2.3 |
3 | Harvard | 2.5 |
4 | Columbia (4.7) | 4.3 |
5 | Chicago (4.6) | 4.2 |
6 | NYU | 6.0 |
7 | Penn | 7.0 |
8 | Virginia | 8.2 |
9 | Berkeley (4.5) | 8.9 |
10 | Michigan (4.4) | 8.9 |
11 | Duke | 10.5 |
12 | Northwestern | 11.2 |
13 | Cornell | 13.1 |
14 | Georgetown | 13.9 |
15 | Texas | 15.1 |
16 | UCLA | 15.8 |
17 | Vanderbilt | 16.6 |
18 | Wash U (3.7) | 18.5 |
19 | USC (3.6) | 18.4 |
20 | Minnesota | 20.4 |
21 | Notre Dame | 22.5 |
22 | GW | 22.7 |
23 | Emory | 23.1 |
24 | Boston University | 23.8 |
25 | Iowa | 25.2 |
26 | UC-Irvine | 26.2 |
27 | Alabama | 26.7 |
28 | Arizona St | 28 |
29 | Indiana- Bloomington | 29.5 |
30 | Boston College | 29.8 |
Kathryn Rubino is a Senior Editor at Above the Law, and host of The Jabot podcast. AtL tipsters are the best, so please connect with her. Feel free to email her with any tips, questions, or comments and follow her on Twitter (@Kathryn1).
Law School Testing Experts Not So Sure Bar Exam Can Be Put Online
People say, ‘Just put the test online.’ This isn’t a situation like the [traditional] bar exam, where we’re all sitting in the same ballroom taking the test. It’s actually a technical system, and you can’t just wish it into existence; you have to build it.
— Kellye Testy, president of the Law School Admission Council, commenting on the proposals made by several states that the bar exam being administered in an online setting due to the COVID-19 pandemic. “I’m not going to say it would be impossible or that it won’t happen, but it’s a really big lift for states,” she continued. “They’re not testing organizations.” LSAC will be offering its first online LSAT in May due to the health crisis.
Staci Zaretsky is a senior editor at Above the Law, where she’s worked since 2011. She’d love to hear from you, so please feel free to email her with any tips, questions, comments, or critiques. You can follow her on Twitter or connect with her on LinkedIn.
Is Zoom A Classroom?
Dear Deans, Provosts, Presidents, University Counsel, and, of course, the ABA:
I am writing to request some information. It has been a crazy time, and I think we have all operated well in keeping the wheels of education turning. However, as we move forward out of this semester, I have some concerns about the dominant method of communicating materials to our students. I think we should give this some thought.
You see, a lot of my colleagues opted for synchronous learning (“Zoom classes”) while I opted for asynchronous learning (“not Zoom”). I feel some peer pressure. So, I thought I would write this blog post to ask some serious questions about Zoom pedagogy because I will be adopting it next semester (if we are still online at that point).
I don’t know the answers myself. But I thought I’d ask the questions.
- A student cleaned their gun on Zoom during class. If that happened to me, could I discipline the student? Even though they are in their own apartment? If I work for a state university, can I boot them off the screen without fear of raising a constitutional concern?
- A professor accidentally left a tab open to his porn while sharing his screen (just the tab showing). He was fired. What if a student does that during a presentation? Are they subject to university regulations? Can I be fired for having a tab open to a museum website with Renaissance paintings? How about an NRA website? A Joe Biden or Donald Trump campaign website? Can a student be dismissed for doing the same thing?
- A student puts on a shirt that says something racist. Can I turn off their video? If so, do I suffer First Amendment issues if I work for a state university?
- Will a foreign LLM lose their status because all of the courses are online and may not count as a “full course of study” in the future?
- Does Zoom comply with ADA regulations? Are their greater challenges for some in using zoom that creates an unfair imbalance in educational opportunities?
- What research demonstrates that, during a time of crisis, synchronous learning is superior to asynchronous learning? How about just research suggesting synchronous is better than asynchronous?
- Is there research about Zoom being the equivalent of face-to-face instruction? There seems to be literature out there suggesting Zoom is more exhausting even if the professor is delivering the exact same lecture they would in a live classroom setting.
- If a student complains about my Zoom lecture, will you have my back or are you now so worried about tuition dollars that no matter what I do it will be wrong?
- There are serious issues with respect to security and Zoom. Have you examined the FERPA issues related to this or no? I just remind you here that the “S” in Zoom stands for security, ha ha! Not only am I concerned about FERPA, I’m concerned about broader security issues such as webcam spying.
- Just going forward, some students have expressed concern about getting credit for online classes via asynchronous learning. Is it your position that Zoom classes will absolutely meet ABA standards after this semester? Also, some law schools were completely asynchronous. Do you expect the ABA to put them on probation?
- There is a broader issue with respect to students of lower socio-economic status (SES). You might recall that when we speak of students of lower SES, they might have difficulties with reliable Wifi, or even having a reliable laptop. Some may even share their laptop across family members who may need it for child instruction, other work, etc. They may hold jobs or need a new one because of the crisis. Does the ABA and law school push toward Zoom undermine all of our talk about equity?
- Does the FBI warning about [racist, sexist, and pornographic] Zoombombing raise any concerns for you all?
- What legal risk do I face as host of a classroom meeting if a third party Zoombombs something offensive?
- Are some students unable to access the technology to the point of feeling abandoned?
- Some students lack childcare in this new COVID-19 world. What guidance have you given faculty about encouraging parents in the Zoom classroom? What advice are we giving students about paying attention during a Zoom class while their children might need attention in the background? By the way, can I ban student family members from “auditing” the class?
- Have you given any guidance to faculty members about the potential for having a “Charlie Kirk” moment? Should we be careful and record to protect ourselves?
- Online classes require small class sizes. Will we be reducing class sizes to accommodate? I hear effective Zoom requires a class size of fewer than 30 students.
- Is it your view that the Zoom courses are temporary? Or give the budget cuts are you looking at using this as a means to kill tenure and perhaps lower your faculty payroll?
- Suppose I teach in Virginia, and I have a student who is sheltering in California. I am requiring that student to get up at 6 a.m. for my 9 a.m. class, correct? Any problem with that?
- If a student refuses to turn their cam on because of privacy concerns, and I mark them absent, what are the legal ramifications?
- What if I want to record my class, and a student refuses who resides in a two-party consent state? Will my blanket syllabus consent defend against state criminal charges?
You’ll see that many of the questions relate to one another as well. I’ll await your response. Again, I don’t have any answers, nor am I seeking to serve on any Zoom committee. I’m just wondering.
Very truly yours,
LawProfBlawg
PS: I forgot to preface this with “this isn’t my area of expertise,” in case that wasn’t obvious.
LawProfBlawg is an anonymous professor at a top 100 law school. You can see more of his musings here. He is way funnier on social media, he claims. Please follow him on Twitter (@lawprofblawg) or Facebook. Email him at lawprofblawg@gmail.com.
How Has Your Firm Been Impacted By COVID-19? [Sponsored]
Thank you for taking this survey!
This survey will take about 5 minutes—and your responses are anonymous so please be as honest as possible.
As a thank you for completing the survey, we’ll enter you into a draw to win one of three $150 Amazon gift cards.
Select “Next” to start.