Magic Circle Firm Suspends Partner Distributions And Freezes Attorney Pay

(Image via Getty)

Magic Circle firm Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer is a giant international player with $1,967,034,000 in gross revenue in 2018 and more than 1,400 attorneys on the pay roll. And amid the COVID-19 economic downturn, the firm is doing everything possible to keep all those attorneys — and their legion of staff — gainfully employed.

In order to avoid any layoffs or furloughs the firm has instituted a series of austerity measures aimed at maintaining cash flow. As reported by Law.com, that includes suspending quarterly partner distribution. Plus lawyer pay globally has been frozen and bonus decisions — typically made in April — will be postponed until September. Freshfields is also considering optional reduced hours for employees that want that flexibility.

If your firm or organization is slashing salaries, closing its doors, or reducing the ranks of its lawyers or staff, whether through open layoffs, stealth layoffs, or voluntary buyouts, please don’t hesitate to let us know. Our vast network of tipsters is part of what makes Above the Law thrive. You can email us or text us (646-820-8477).

If you’d like to sign up for ATL’s Layoff Alerts, please scroll down and enter your email address in the box below this post. If you previously signed up for the layoff alerts, you don’t need to do anything. You’ll receive an email notification within minutes of each layoff, salary cut, or furlough announcement that we publish.


headshotKathryn Rubino is a Senior Editor at Above the Law, and host of The Jabot podcast. AtL tipsters are the best, so please connect with her. Feel free to email her with any tips, questions, or comments and follow her on Twitter (@Kathryn1).

Your Bar Association COVID Board Is Probably Not The Place To Downplay COVID

Lawyers are opinionated folks and the American response to COVID seems to be wrong in every conceivable vector — not enough tests, not enough ventilators, closing things down that wouldn’t have needed closing if we’d had enough of the other two — but the place to vent about your issues with the deep state for eating into your profit margin is not the bar association COVID board.

We’re not going to call out anyone specifically here, but there are lawyers hopping on local boards to complain about “idiot politicians” ruining the economy for a disease that isn’t likely to kill. Sadly, we actually wish we were calling out one specific attorney, but this is happening on a few lawyer groups right now. So let’s use this space as a friendly a reminder to these folks that they need to shut the f**k up.

People are going to the local COVID board to write obituaries for fellow attorneys and discuss how they plan to cope with the fallout from the virus. They absolutely aren’t there for your pontification about how we should all lick flagpoles for the economy. Nobody cares here; go find a QAnon board to populate.

It’s about knowing your audience not about trying (and in these cases failing) to be right. When everyone on the board is talking about losing a loved one, it doesn’t actually matter to point out that “well, actually, most people who contract the virus will survive.” Just because it’s true doesn’t make you any less of an asshole.


HeadshotJoe Patrice is a senior editor at Above the Law and co-host of Thinking Like A Lawyer. Feel free to email any tips, questions, or comments. Follow him on Twitter if you’re interested in law, politics, and a healthy dose of college sports news. Joe also serves as a Managing Director at RPN Executive Search.

With Record Low Pass Rate, Almost Everyone Fails California Bar Exam

(Image via Getty)

The results are in from the February 2020 administration of the California bar exam, and to say they aren’t pretty would be an understatement because the State Bar once again has a historically low pass rate.

According to a press release from the State Bar of California, the overall pass rate for the February 2020 exam was 26.8 percent, while the pass rate for first-time takers was 38 percent. The pass rate for retakers was a shockingly low 22 percent. Last February, the overall pass rate was 31.4 percent, the second-lowest pass rate California has seen since the February 1982 exam. This is the second time since 1986 that the overall pass rate has fallen below 30 percent, and the lowest pass rate recorded in California since 1951, the earliest date listed on the state’s summary of results. For the sake of comparison, let’s take a look at the results for the past few administrations of the California bar.

In February 2015, the overall pass rate was 39.5 percent, and the pass rate for first-time takers was 47.4 percent. In July 2015, the overall pass rate was 46.6 percent, and the pass rate for first-time takers was 60 percent. In February 2016, the overall pass rate was 35.7 percent, and the pass rate for first-time takers was 45 percent. In July 2016, the overall pass rate was 43 percent, and the pass rate for first-time takers was 56 percent. In February 2017, the overall pass rate was 34.5 percent, and the pass rate for first-time takers was 39 percent. In July 2017, the overall pass rate for the state’s first foray with a two-day exam was 49.6 percent, and the pass rate for first-time takers was 62 percent. In February 2018, the overall pass rate was 27.3 percent, and the pass rate for first-time takers was 39 percent. In July 2018, the overall pass rate was 40.7 percent, and the pass rate for first-time takers was 55 percent. In February 2019, the overall pass rate was 31.4 percent, and the pass rate for first-time takers was 41 percent. In July 2019, after an unprecedented essay topic leak, the overall pass rate was 50.1 percent, and the pass rate for first-time takers was 64 percent.

Once again, the State Bar again used the total number of those who completed the exam in their final calculation for the February 2020 passage rate rather than the total number of people who actually sat for the exam. We shudder to think of what the true overall pass rate might be for this administration of the exam.

This winter’s 26.8 percent pass rate represents a 4.6 percentage point decrease over last February’s results, with fewer than 3 in 10 test-takers managing to post a passing score. Donna Hershkowitz, Interim Executive Director of the State Bar, didn’t mention the low pass rate, instead issuing remarks on the administration of the state bar during the pandemic, and the future of the exam, in general.

On the bright side, if there is one, the state’s mean scaled MBE score was 1357, compared with the national average of 1326. (Both scores were down from last year, and the national mean MBE score was an all-time low.)

Here are some additional statistics from this winter’s exam:

School Type First-Timers Repeaters
California ABA 42% 30%
Out-of-State ABA 45% 22%
California Accredited (but not ABA) 17% 10%
Unaccredited: Fixed-Facility 0% 8%
Unaccredited: Correspondence 14% 11%
Unaccredited Distance Learning 16% 9%
All Others 41% 20%
All Applicants 38% 22%

Something here clearly needs to change, and it’s not just law school admissions standards anymore. Imagine how many more people would have passed the exam if the California Supreme Court had decided to lower the state bar’s cut score to bring it in line with that of the vast majority of other states.

At this point, lowering the cut score on the California bar exam may be the state’s only remedy for the thousands of would-be lawyers who continue to fail the test.

Congratulations if you managed to pass the bar exam in California this winter. If you didn’t pass, don’t despair. Many very successful people have failed the bar exam (see our list of famous bar exam failures). Focus on September and try to develop a plan for passing, and someday, you’ll conquer the beast that is the California bar exam.

State Bar of California Releases Results of February 2020 Bar Exam [State Bar of California]
California Bar Exam Pass Rates Drop to All-Time Low 26.8% on February Test [The Recorder]


Staci ZaretskyStaci Zaretsky is a senior editor at Above the Law, where she’s worked since 2011. She’d love to hear from you, so please feel free to email her with any tips, questions, comments, or critiques. You can follow her on Twitter or connect with her on LinkedIn.

The Waves Of COVID-19 Insurance Claims

I usually steer far away from insurance issues in this column. Those issues don’t interest a general readership, and the issues strike many people as dull.  (The issues also cut a little close to the bone for me, given my employer, so saying anything about insurance issues is a tad personally dangerous.)

But I heard something interesting about insurance last week that I just had to share with you: Some European insurance companies are now seeing fewer automobile insurance claims than at any time since World War II.

(On second thought, maybe my definition of  “interesting” and yours don’t match up precisely.)

That gives you an idea of what the pandemic has done to travel across a big swath of the world.

As long as I’ve mentioned the word “insurance,” I’ll simply recite the waves of claims that are occurring, or are expected to occur, in the insurance industry as a result of COVID-19.

Travel: This wave has largely come and gone. It’s claims under travel insurance policies for canceled trips.

Property and business interruption claims: These claims are embryonic.  Many claims for business interruption insurance are just now being adjusted, because no one yet knows the full extent of business interruption loss. But the fight over this insurance is just getting started.

The primary dispute is this: Much business interruption coverage is triggered only by “property damage.” (The earthquake destroys your manufacturing plant. How much business interruption did you suffer as a result of your plant being out of commission?) Policyholders and insurers have different positions on whether the presence of a virus constitutes “property damage.” Given the amounts in dispute, there will of course be a gazillion subsidiary issues, but that’s enough to let you mention this at a particularly boring virtual cocktail party.

All three branches of government are involved in this dispute: The judiciary is interested, because lawsuits have been filed. Legislatures are considering laws that would compel insurers to pay COVID-19 business interruption losses even if the losses are technically not covered. And some of the executive orders implementing stay-at-home and other directives contain language that could affect these coverage issues.

That’s wave two.

The third wave will be cyber-insurance coverage. The whole world is working from home. That will result in losses. Are the losses insured?

Then there’s employment practices liability insurance: What coverage is available as employees are furloughed or laid off?

Workers compensation: Who pays when employees become ill as they return to work?

Bankruptcy and trade credit: When companies go under, what types of coverage are available?

And finally directors’ and officers’ liability coverage: Who gets named, and who’s covered, when the inevitable shareholder litigation begins?

That’s the landscape.

I understand that all your private equity lawyers are sitting on their thumbs these days. But I’m pleased to report that your coverage counsel are about to have a very busy decade.


Mark Herrmann spent 17 years as a partner at a leading international law firm and is now deputy general counsel at a large international company. He is the author of The Curmudgeon’s Guide to Practicing Law and Drug and Device Product Liability Litigation Strategy (affiliate links). You can reach him by email at inhouse@abovethelaw.com.

Surprisingly, Dan Loeb Doesn’t Want To Be In The International Tourism Luxury Goods Business Anymore

Morning Docket: 05.11.20

* Evidence points to Justice Stephen Breyer being the perpetrator of the “flush heard ’round the world” during telephonic Supreme Court arguments last week. [Slate]

* A Georgia lawyer has been identified as the leaker of a video showing the Ahmaud Arbery shooting. [New York Times]

* Quinn Emanuel is representing Tesla in its lawsuit against a CA county over closures related to COVID-19. Hope the firm gets a few Model Xs thrown in for the representation. [The Recorder]

* A Wisconsin lawyer, who is accused of offering to bribe officials for a client, has avoided prison. Talk about a full-service lawyer… [Milwaukee Journal Sentinel]

* Republican lawmakers are ready to fill any Supreme Court vacancy that may occur this year. [Politico]

* A lawsuit about Ben and Jerry’s claim of using milk from “happy cows” has been dismissed. Guess the cows really were happy? [Fox News]


Jordan Rothman is a partner of The Rothman Law Firm, a full-service New York and New Jersey law firm. He is also the founder of Student Debt Diaries, a website discussing how he paid off his student loans. You can reach Jordan through email at jordan@rothmanlawyer.com.

Zimbabwe’s land reform areas twenty years on (1): A blog series – The Zimbabwean

Twenty years ago the news was filled with stories about land invasions in Zimbabwe. Since then, a group of us have been working in Masvingo province in particular (but also now in Mazowe in Mashonaland Central and Matobo in Matabeleland South) attempting to offer research-based reflections on what happened to people’s livelihoods. Since 2008, this blog has been dedicated to an informed discussion of the ramifications of the land reform, aiming to counter some of the misinformed debate that sadly is still evident, even 20 years on.

The research has been based on long-term field studies in a number of sites. We have been collecting crop production data on many sites continuously, and this has been complemented with more detailed census surveys, exploring demography, land use, asset ownership, labour practices, and off-farm income earning, amongst a whole host of questions. We have also carried out focused enquires on themes that have emerged, like young people’s livelihoodsmedium-scale farms, changing land tenure governancerural townssmall-scale irrigation, amongst much more. As a recent blog series documented, we have also been exploring the comparisons between resettlement and communal areas, testing the assumption that redistributing more land has resulted in improved livelihoods (by and large it has). We have tried to draw out of this research some overarching policy conclusions, and attempted to relay them to government, donors and other researchers through various fora.

Over time, we have tried to share our results in various forms. At last count there were 18 journal articles published from our research, and our 2010 book – Zimbabwe’s Land Reform: Myths and Realities – remains a key text. Since then two books – Debating Zimbabwe’s Land Reform and Land Reform in Zimbabwe: Challenges for Policy– have been published that pull together a number of blogs into themes, with short introductions to the issues. Aimed at disseminating in our field sites (see picture below), we have also produced several booklets (in English and Shona) and two video seriesThe Conversation has published a few overviews of research over time, including a set in early 2018 aimed at informing the new land reform policy debates emerging then.

This post introduces a new blog series, based on new data that have just been analysed. The series examines how people are faring in our Masvingo province land reform area study sites, based on a census survey during 2019 that repeated earlier rounds in 2006-7 and 2011-12. The survey was followed up by extensive qualitative discussions with various informants across the sites. To conclude the study, at the end of last year, we visited many of our land reform sites across Masvingo province to catch up with people there. They were fascinating visits, as we have been working in these areas since the early 2000s, soon after they were settled following the ‘fast-track’ land reform of 2000.

There are 16 sites, stretching from Gutu in the north to Mwenezi in the south, covering A2 (medium-scale) and A1 farms, including originally over 400 households. The A1 farms include those that are ‘self-contained’ (more like small A2 farms really) and the more common ‘villagised’ arrangements, including those that are well-established in Gutu and Masvingo districts and those that are more ‘informal’ (some without ‘offer letters’, permits to occupy the land) in Chiredzi and Mwenezi districts.

This blog series reflects on our preliminary findings, both from the quantitative survey and the qualitative interviews, focusing on each resettlement category. The series concludes with a very provisional reflection on how things have changed over time, with some ideas about the future. The analysis is only very tentative, and the material deserves more time to go into depth. While there are important changes and nuances to the land reform story, the ‘myths’ about Zimbabwe’s land reform that we challenged in our first book in 2010 remain myths, and there is a much more complex reality.

A number of important themes emerge across the blogs, with implications for the future. In all sites there is deepening social differentiation, with some being able to accumulate while others are struggling. This is creating new labour relations, as some become wage labourers for others. Changing environmental conditions are mentioned frequently, as climate change impacts intensify, making the diversifications into small-scale irrigation vital. This is especially important for women and young people, especially those who cannot gain access to land and have few opportunities for off-farm employment given the state of the Zimbabwean economy. Despite the clear challenges of farming, successes are concentrated in the A1 schemes, with most A2 farms struggling due to lack of financing. Successful A1 agriculture is driving local growth and investment, especially in rural towns. The story is diverse and complex,  and will become more so as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic.

As Zimbabwe (again) contemplates a new land policy, and undertakes wider assessments through the Zimbabwe Land Commission, having data to inform interventions now remains important.

This post was written by Ian Scoones and first appeared on ZimbabwelandLed by Felix Murimbarimba, the Masvingo team is: Moses Mutoko, Thandiwe Shoko, Tanaka Murimbarimba, Liberty Tavagwisa, Tongai Murimbarimba, Vimbai Museva, Jacob Mahenehene, Tafadzwa Mavedzenge (data entry) and Shingirai, the driver. Thanks to the research team, ministry of agriculture officials and the many farmers who have supported the work over the years.

Post published in: Agriculture

Deafening silence – Zimbabwe Vigil Diary – The Zimbabwean

Ncube in essence confessed that the government had blatantly lied to the world and the people of Zimbabwe. There was no denial by the government and he wasn’t sacked. All we got from Zanu PF was silence.

Opposition MP Tendai Biti, Finance Minister in the late Government of National Unity, said Ncube’s unsuccessful begging letter to international financial institutions was ‘the final surrender of any dignity of a corrupt regime’.

In the letter Ncube promised that in return for aid the government would undertake political and economic reforms. Biti dismissed this, saying the government had repeatedly promised to reform but they never would.

Biti also accused the government of declaring war on the opposition by allowing the recall of four MDC alliance parliamentarians. He said the move marked the end of normal politics. The party has suspended participation in all parliamentary proceedings (see: https://www.newzimbabwe.com/watch-biti-says-mps-recall-a-declaration-of-war-by-mnangagwa/).

Another surprise this week was the small number of reported cases of coronavirus infections in Zimbabwe. It appears that more Zimbabweans are dying of the virus in the UK than at home.

What was not surprising was a warning by Amnesty International that in some areas the authorities are tying food aid to the recipient’s political affiliation. It says the problem is especially acute in rural areas, where people who don’t belong to Zanu PF are being denied the means to survive (see: https://www.voanews.com/covid-19-pandemic/amnesty-zimbabwe-playing-politics-food-aid-distribution).

Other points

NOTICES:

  • The Restoration of Human Rights in Zimbabwe (ROHR) is the Vigil’s partner organisation based in Zimbabwe. ROHR grew out of the need for the Vigil to have an organisation on the ground in Zimbabwe which reflected the Vigil’s mission statement in a practical way. ROHR in the UK actively fundraises through membership subscriptions, events, sales etc to support the activities of ROHR in Zimbabwe. Please note that the official website of ROHR Zimbabwe is http://www.rohrzimbabwe.org/. Any other website claiming to be the official website of ROHR in no way represents us.
  • The Vigil’s book ‘Zimbabwe Emergency’ is based on our weekly diaries. It records how events in Zimbabwe have unfolded as seen by the diaspora in the UK. It chronicles the economic disintegration, violence, growing oppression and political manoeuvring – and the tragic human cost involved. It is available at the Vigil. All proceeds go to the Vigil and our sister organisation the Restoration of Human Rights in Zimbabwe’s work in Zimbabwe. The book is also available from Amazon.
  • Facebook pages:

Vigil: https://www.facebook.com/zimbabwevigil

ROHR: https://www.facebook.com/Restoration-of-Human-Rights-ROHR-Zimbabwe-International-370825706588551/

ZAF: https://www.facebook.com/pages/Zimbabwe-Action-Forum-ZAF/490257051027515

Post published in: Featured

The Moscow-Harare-Minsk Hotline – The Zimbabwean

Ever since Western Countries cut the supply of  military hardware to Zimbabwe 20 years ago, following sanctions imposed against the country’s negative human rights record under Robert Mugabe, Zimbabwe has been struggling to bolster its arsenal. At the time, Zimbabwe was recovering from a hardware deficit following its 1998 military intervention in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) war.

The economic and human rights abuse crises reached their peak during 2008 due to Mugabe’s money-printing activity, which ignited severe hyperinflation. Although the government provided multiple excuses throughout the decades, like the drought, the real problem remains poor governance and in-house corruption. Mugabe ruled Zimbabwe from 1980 to2017 and his successor, Emmerson Mnangagwa, has similar tendencies.

The US first imposed sanctions against Zimbabwe in 2001 bypassing the Zimbabwe Democracy and Economic Recovery Act (ZIDERA), which referred to sending troops to DRC, the private appropriation of public assets and the fast-track land reform program. In 2018, ZIDERA was amended to address new issues. The updated ZIDERA urged the Zimbabwean government to implement the 2013 constitution, specifically to respect and protect human rights, to account for diamond and mineral revenue, and to enforce the SADC Tribunal’s decisions on human rights and land compensation.

However, the government still fails to account for mineral revenues and perpetuates brutal violations of human rights. During his election campaign in 2017, President Mnangagwa stressed his aspirations to lead a business- friendly policy and restore Zimbabwe’s economy. After being elected, he proved to be incapable of doing any of the above. On the contrary, Mnangagwa’s administration decided to print its own faux money which naturally led to monetary collapse. Politically connected elites have been getting US dollars from the reserve bank and selling them at a profit on the parallel market, pushing down the value of the national currency. Meanwhile, banks in Zimbabwe have no US dollars, South African Rands, or Botswana Pulas currencies, and therefore cannot supply stores with the funds to carry on business activity.

The status quo continues, as does the looting of public resources and raids on bank accounts, with the government and Reserve Bank taking over private citizens’ forex savings. The government holds on to repressive laws and it condones violence by state security agents, protecting known perpetrators of serious violations. Tendai Biti, an opposition MP and former finance minister, complains that life has gone back to colonial times: “I’m washing in a bucket, my friend, as if it is Southern Rhodesia in 1923.”

Nonetheless, on January 10, 2020, Zimbabwe replaced its single-engine J-7 fighter jets procured from China with Russian-made $500 million MiG-29 and MiG-35 aircraft. In return, Zimbabwe mortgaged part of its vast mineral wealth to Moscow, including the Darwendale platinum reserve. The arms deal between the countries is part of their already existing $3 billion joint platinum project in collaboration with Rostec from 2014. The deal is one of many agreements signed during a trip to Zimbabwe by Russian Foreign Affairs Minister, Sergey Lavrov, on March 8, 2018.
Is the upgrade really necessary while, after decades of mismanagement and corruption, Zimbabwe is a wreck? Its economy is crashing, and its people are hungry. In fact, according to the UN World Food Programme, by the first half of 2020, the annual inflation will reach 500%, and about half of the population in Zimbabwe will not be able to provide food. The country is poorer than it has ever been due to its ruler’s greed. Nonetheless, other figures have tried to take advantage of the country’s resources. Among them are neighbouring governments, donors, and foreign stakeholders.

Over the past decade, Eastern European countries have filled in the gap left by the West. Zimbabwe- Russian trade reached its peak during 2017-2019. In 2019, the President of Zimbabwe, Emmerson Mnangagwa, together with over 40 other African leaders flew to Russia in hopes of taking better advantage of the newly established cycle. According to the Russian Government, over the first five months of 2019, Russia-Zimbabwe trade rose 9.5% year-on-year to US$18,5 million. Trade-in 2018 stood at US$45,9 million, down 13.6% from the previous year.

Many businessmen from Eastern Europe have been trying to take a bite of the increasingly flourishing commercial interest of Zimbabwe in Russia. One of them, a very significant connecting link between Zimbabwe and Eastern European countries, is the Belarusian businessman Alexander Zingman. Zingman can be seen a lot on the media at events with multiple figures of Africa’s political elite. Including Zambian President Edgar Lungu, Zimbabwe Minister of Lands and Agriculture, Perence Shiri, Zimbabwe Press& Permanent Secretary in the Ministry of Information, George Charamba and others.

Zingman has an impressive track record of brokering several deals in Tanzania and Chad with his partner Witold Karczewski, Vice Chairman of the Polish Chamber of Commerce. Starting in 2017, he has been involved in many of the military purchases between Zimbabwe and other African countries with Belarus and the Russian defence industry, which has been under US sanctions in recent years. His business activity is focused on agriculture equipment, trade of arms, and military equipment.

Alexander Zingman is tied with a network of powerful people, both in East Europe and in the African Continent. One of his closest friends is, in fact, the President of Zimbabwe Emmerson Mnangagwa. Other than brokering deals between Mnangagwa and officials from Russia and Belarus, Zingman is often invited to Mnangagwa’s house to spend time with the family. Zingman is also in contact with the President’s son Emmerson Mnangagwa Junior, who has been involved in his father’s business with Zingman.

On March 3rd, 2018, Zimbabwe Vice President, Constantino Chiwenga, signed $68 million worth of deals as a part of the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) for economic development and trade with Belarus Chief of Presidential Affairs, Victor Sheiman. Open-source media photos reveal that Zingman accompanied the delegation of Belarus. Zingman was among the figures that surrounded Sheiman and Mnangagwa, both sanctioned by OFAC. On March 29, 2018, a Zimbabwe delegation visited Russia’s Ulan-Ude Aviation Factory, a part of the Russian Helicopters group, to view the VIP modification of Mi-171E helicopters. According to the Factory Managing Director, Leonid Belych, the Zimbabwean guests, and the factory’s authorities, have discussed the terms of prospective sales contracts. Following these meetings, on May 2018, Alexander Zingman finalized a deal with Zimbabwe regarding a sell of two Mil Mi-17 helicopters through the company STAR Strategic Assets III LP.

It was not long before the three met again on September 12, 2018, after swearing in John Chamunorwa Mangwiro as Deputy Minister of Health. President Emmerson Mnangagwa hosted Sheiman and Zingman at State House in Harare for two days. Sheiman and Zingman, who arrived to follow up on several investment deals between the countries, presented Mnangagwa with a birthday gift of a sword inscribed his name and his popular slogan “Pasi neMhandu.” On November 2018, Zingman met with the Chief of Russian Helicopter Company “Baginski”, Andrei Ivanovich Boginsky.

On January 17, 2019, Mnangagwa took part in the opening ceremony of the Zimbabwe consulate’s office in Minsk, Belarus, and admitted Alexander Zingman as Zimbabwe’s Honorary Consul in Belarus. At the end of the ceremony, the President of Belarus, Alexander Lukashenko, invited the guests for an official lunch in honour of the Head of State and Commander-in-Chief of the Zimbabwe Defence Forces. Among the participants were Zimbabwean Minister of Lands, Agriculture and Rural Resettlement Perence Shiri, Press Secretary in the Office of the President of Zimbabwe George Charamba, Belarusian Minister of Foreign Affairs Vladimir Makei and others.

In the same month of Zingman’s appointment, Zimbabwe replaced its single-engine J-7 fighter jets with the MiG-29 and MiG-35 aircrafts. The above sequence of events draws the conclusion that there is a high probability that Zingman was behind this purchase as well. If so, was Mnangagwa appointing him in order to protect his own activities and expand his manoeuvre range?

The thought of the splurge in upgrading the presidential aircraft while Zimbabwe suffers from hunger is a slap in the face for the country’s population. This goes to show that the leader of Zimbabwe still trades the country’s natural resources, and perhaps even distributes generous payments to his middleman, Alexander Zingman, while his nation starves to death.

Post published in: Business