Billion-Dollar Biglaw Firm Cutting Associate Salaries

The Biglaw cost-cutting measures brought on by COVID-19 is creeping up and up the Am Law rankings, proving big gross revenue is not enough to stem cash flow concerns. The latest firm to announce cuts is Reed Smith, who raked in $1,174,973,000 in 2018 gross revenue, making it 27th on the Am Law 100 ranking.

Today, firm global managing partner Sandy Thomas announced on an all-associate call that associate pay will be cut by 15 percent for May through September. They’re also cutting counsel salary by 10 percent. And they’d previously announced a voluntary leave program during the coronavirus crisis. (The firm also released an FAQ about the cuts, available on the next page.)

A firm spokesperson had this to say about the cuts:

As a result of the effects of the ongoing COVID-19 crisis, we have made a series of compensation adjustments in recent weeks that affect our lawyers and professional staff. After our initial decision last month to defer partner distributions across the firm, we also reduced base pay for counsel by 10 percent for the next three months and deferred decisions on merit increases and discretionary bonus payments for professional staff. We can now confirm that we are reducing associate pay by 15 percent for four months, beginning in May. Annual raises have already been awarded to associates, and their previously announced bonuses will be paid later this month.

According to tipsters, the cuts (particularly since they have associates taking a deeper cut than counsel) have gone over like a lead balloon:

Associates are MAD. Sandy Thomas came on and gave what came off as a very condescending pep talk – we know you’re working hard because we see your utilization and we know your clients need you. Many of us are left to wonder, ok, then why cut our pay so much (5% higher pay cut than counsel took).

Best of luck to those at Reed Smith as they deal with these austerity measures.

If your firm or organization is slashing salaries, closing its doors, or reducing the ranks of its lawyers or staff, whether through open layoffs, stealth layoffs, or voluntary buyouts, please don’t hesitate to let us know. Our vast network of tipsters is part of what makes Above the Law thrive. You can email us or text us (646-820-8477).

If you’d like to sign up for ATL’s Layoff Alerts, please scroll down and enter your email address in the box below this post. If you previously signed up for the layoff alerts, you don’t need to do anything. You’ll receive an email notification within minutes of each layoff, salary cut, or furlough announcement that we publish.


headshotKathryn Rubino is a Senior Editor at Above the Law, and host of The Jabot podcast. AtL tipsters are the best, so please connect with her. Feel free to email her with any tips, questions, or comments and follow her on Twitter (@Kathryn1).

COVID-19 Forces The Legal Profession’s Hand And Technology Adoption Increases Exponentially

I know it seems like ancient history, but it was only about a month ago in mid-March that many states closed all nonessential businesses, which resulted in the closure of most law offices. Right around that same time, many courts suspended most in-person proceedings. With the issuance of those declarations, the world as we knew it came to a screeching halt.

And then, against all odds, the legal profession rose to the occasion and began to rapidly adopt technology at rates never before seen. Governors and courts issued orders in rapid pace that affected — and modernized — the practice of law. Seemingly overnight, our profession was practicing law like it was 2030 by requiring lawyers to use readily available technologies to facilitate and streamline the swift administration of justice.

I’ve been tracking this phenomenon with a mixture of incredulity and amazement. For those who may have missed some of the announcements of these advancements, which often got lost in the midst of the daily barrage of ever-changing COVID-19 news, here are some of the most notable examples of technological innovation and adoption that have impacted the practice of law.

E-signatures

Courts across the country have begun to allow electronic signatures to be  used in place of “wet” signatures since the social distancing required by COVID-19 makes it difficult, if not impossible, to obtain in-person signatures. For example, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court issued this temporary order on April 6 that permits attorneys “required to sign a document to be served on another party or filed with the court, … (to) electronically sign, unless the court specifically orders otherwise.” As a result, the need for e-signature tools, whether they’re standalone or built into law practice management software, has increased significantly in recent weeks.

Virtual notaries

The COVID-19 pandemic has understandably resulted in an increased interest in the preparation of documents that require notarization, such as wills and other documents like healthcare proxies. But the social distancing measures in effect obviously impact the ability to have the in-person notarization of the documents. That’s why most states have taken emergency action to enact remote notary rules that permit remote (or “virtual”) notarization via videoconferencing. You can find a full list of the states that permit remote notarization of documents here.

Digital documents

Another step forward for legal technology has been the acceptance of digital documents for court filings in lieu of paper documents. For years now, many courts have resisted the move toward all digital documents and have continued to require that paper documents be filed for many types of matters. COVID-19 is changing that since many courthouses and clerk’s offices have been forced to close their doors for the time being. As a result, many courts are revising their rules and allowing solely digital documents to be filed in matters that would have previously required paper document filings. For example, in this order from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit dated March 26, Chief Judge Robert A. Katzman suspended the court rules that required the filing of paper copies of briefs.

E-filing

Likewise, social distancing and the resulting shift to digital documents by many courts necessitates that e-filing be permitted in lieu of in-person filing of pleadings. Accordingly, many courts now permit e-filing in cases where it was not previously allowed. By way of example, the California Supreme Court issued this order on March 18 and subsequently posted the following notice to its e-filing website: “In light of the California Supreme Court’s [March 18, 2020] amendment of the ‘Supreme Court Rules Regarding Electronic Filing,’ rule 2, henceforth and until further notice, all documents (including briefs) must be filed electronically on the ‘TrueFiling’ platform, and paper copies should not be submitted …”

Videoconferencing (or teleconferencing)

Last, but not least, courts and legal professionals have embraced video conferencing en masse from the very start of the shelter-in-place requirements. Courts at all levels, from local courts to the highest court in the land, have begun to permit legal proceedings to move forward via video or teleconferencing. For example, on March 31, the Judicial Conference of the United States announced that it had “temporarily approved the use of video and teleconferencing for certain criminal proceedings and access via teleconferencing for civil proceedings during the COVID-19 national emergency.” And earlier this week, the United States Supreme Court made the announcement that it would “hear oral arguments by telephone conference on May 4, 5, 6, 11, 12 and 13 in a limited number of previously postponed cases.”

So, the times they are a-changin’ folks, and more rapidly than I ever expected. If you’re interested in more insight on the unprecedented rate of change and what it means for the legal profession, make sure to check out Above the Law columnist Bob Ambrogi’s latest LawNext Podcast, where Bob interviews Richard Susskind. Find out what Richard — a world-renowned expert, speaker, and author on the future of legal services — has to say about the whether the COVID-19 pandemic will facilitate a fundamental change in the adoption of technology by the legal profession and the delivery of legal services generally.


Nicole Black is a Rochester, New York attorney and Director of Business and Community Relations at MyCase, web-based law practice management software. She’s been blogging since 2005, has written a weekly column for the Daily Record since 2007, is the author of Cloud Computing for Lawyers, co-authors Social Media for Lawyers: the Next Frontier, and co-authors Criminal Law in New York. She’s easily distracted by the potential of bright and shiny tech gadgets, along with good food and wine. You can follow her on Twitter at @nikiblack and she can be reached at niki.black@mycase.com.

Wannabe Biglaw Firm Closes Its Doors

Pierce Bainbridge Beck Price & Hecht had some pretty lofty goals. The litigation boutique claimed to be “the fastest-growing law firm in the history of the world,” and boasted they were “creating SEAL Team Six of litigation.” But according to a report by Law360, the dream is over and the firm is shuttering its doors.

According to reports, COO and deputy general counsel Camille Varlack and CFO Kevin Cash told attorneys at the firm on Monday that the firm would begin winding down operations on Wednesday. Sources at the firm also reportedly were told they will not receive their next paycheck, scheduled for April 30th.

The firm has been steadily losing attorneys over the last six months — approximately 50 over that time frame. The firm also reportedly laid off ~10 attorneys on April 1st. As of Monday, the firm was left with about 20 attorneys. A current attorney at the firm told Law360 about the wind down:

“If you don’t have any clients and you’re not the senior attorney on any cases, you can just walk away,” one current attorney said of the wind down. “But if you are, this puts you in a very difficult position, particularly if you have court deadlines coming up.”

Leading up to the wind down, the firm also experienced a bunch of shake up at the top of the firm:

John Pierce took a leave of absence in March amid allegations he’d taken out a personal loan using the firm’s assets as collateral. In a statement given to The American Lawyer at the time, a firm spokesperson said a “preliminary investigation” had corroborated that he took out a personal loan, but Pierce himself has not publicly commented on the matter.

Pierce’s departure left attorney Tom Warren in charge, but earlier this month Warren and two named partners, Carolynn Beck and Maxim Price, also left the firm.

Plus David Hecht left the firm in March. So perhaps it isn’t a real surprise that the firm is closing its door.

Best of luck to the Pierce Bainbridge attorneys as they try to figure out the next step in their career, amid a global pandemic.


headshotKathryn Rubino is a Senior Editor at Above the Law, and host of The Jabot podcast. AtL tipsters are the best, so please connect with her. Feel free to email her with any tips, questions, or comments and follow her on Twitter (@Kathryn1).

Desperate Times Call For Innovation

First online notarization, then the legalization of surrogacy, now an expansion of the standby guardian law and authorization of video witnessing of estate planning documents. Governor Andrew Cuomo of  COVID-19-stricken New York is a gift not only to trusts and estates attorneys, but to all citizens.

Cuomo’s recent Executive Order No. 202.14 pertains in part to New York State healthcare workers exposed to COVID-19 who can now designate a standby guardian for their minor children. The New York Legal Assistance Group and Greenberg Traurig, LLP, who worked pro bono on the modification, helped to draft the expansion of the Surrogate’s Court Procedure Act (S.C.P.A.) § 1726.

Generally the statute allows an individual to appoint a standby guardian if the parent/guardian:

  1. A) becomes incapacitated; (B) becomes debilitated and consents to the commencement of the standby guardian’s authority; (C) becomes subject to an administrative separation and consents to the commencement of the standby guardian’s authority as required pursuant to the provisions of subdivision seven of this section; or (D) dies prior to the commencement of a judicial proceeding to appoint a guardian of the person and/or property of an infant.

Executive Order 202.14 expands the statute to include a parent or legal guardian, custodian or primary caretaker “who works or volunteers in a health care facility or who reasonably believes that they may otherwise be exposed to COVID-19, may designate a standby guardian by means of a written designation.”

A standby guardian is appointed by a written statement executed by a serving guardian/parent or alternatively by court proceeding. Because courts are closed or operating on limited schedules, a standby guardian statement is important not only for the gravely ill, or debilitated, but those who are on the front lines, fighting COVID-19. At a minimum their inclusion in the statute  provides peace of mind that if something were to happen to them, their children will be cared for.

Generally, a last will and testament dictates the guardian choice for one’s minor children in the event a parent or parents die. The last will also nominates an individual to control the minor’s assets. If one dies, a last will is filed with the local probate court and the nominations for executor, trustee, and guardian are reviewed and then authorized by the court. A standby guardian document permits immediate control to pass to the standby guardian who has no powers until a triggering event happens. In cases of incapacitated, severely ill, or deported parents, this is important to execute.

Historically S.C.P.A. Section 1726 was created as a result of the AIDS crisis, in 1992. Recently, in 2018  it was extended to immigrants who were at risk of being separated from their children because of deportation or detainment. The statute’s reference to  “administrative separation” pertains to the latter.

Within the same executive order, Cuomo has allowed the video witnessing of estate documents including statutory gifts riders, last wills, and trusts. Video notarization had been addressed in a prior executive order, however, many estate planning documents require witnesses, not just notary acknowledgements. Many a law school class and bar exam question focus on the tenets of Estates Powers and Trust Law (E.P.T.L.) Section  3-2.1 and the requirements for the in-person witnessing of wills, While other states have allowed electronic wills, New York has not.

Cuomo’s executive order remains in effect until May 7, 2020, and it permits signing of these important documents, before videoed witnesses, in the safety of one’s own home. The famous saying “Desperate times call for desperate measures” might be rewritten in today’s scenario to suggest that New York’s interpretation is “Desperate times call for innovative measures.”


Cori A. Robinson is a solo practitioner having founded Cori A. Robinson PLLC, a New York and New Jersey law firm, in 2017. For more than a decade Cori has focused her law practice on trusts and estates and elder law including estate and Medicaid planning, probate and administration, estate litigation, and guardianships. She can be reached at cori@robinsonestatelaw.com.

Zimbabwe is on lockdown, but money-changers are still busy – The Zimbabwean

Illegal money traders who used to flood the streets of Harare and Mutare are now working from home while Zimbabwe is under lockdown to curb the spread of coronavirus [File: Farai Matiashe/Al Jazeera]

Harare, Zimbabwe – In the densely-packed Harare suburb of Kambuzuma, in the midst of a nationwide lockdown, 25-year-old Philip Mundozo is hard at work, servicing customers who want to buy and sell the currency of choice in Zimbabwe – United States dollars.

“I cannot go to town, but that has not stopped me from doing my work. Customers call me and come to my house to trade,” Mundozo told Al Jazeera by phone.

Before President Emmerson Mnangagwa ordered a 21-day lockdown in late March to curb the spread of COVID-19, Mundozo’s place of business was a bus terminal – popularly known as Copa Cabana – in the central business district in Harare.

But COVID-19 containment measures have only slightly dented demand for money-changing.

Zimbabwe has confirmed 18 cases of COVID-19, and three deaths from the disease. But a deep economic crisis has ravaged the troubled southern African nation’s healthcare system.

Medics, opposition politicians and activists have warned about a woefully insufficient number of testing kits. When people do fall ill – with any ailment – they often struggle to find professional care.

Mundozo is very aware of the health risks involved in his customer-facing corner of Zimbabwe’s informal economy, where he and many of the country’s youths carve out a living as money-changers.

“I just make sure that when they [customers] come I observe social distancing [because] in as much as I need money to sustain my family, I don’t want to get infected or to infect them,” he said.

Supply and demand

Money-changers like Mundozo charge fees for “cash-in, cash-out services” that allow customers on the country’s mobile EcoCash platform to convert electronic balances in their mobile money wallets into hard currency, and vice versa.

Their services are actively sought.

In Zimbabwe, buying something with electronic balances can invite a markup as high as 50 percent because supplies of hard cash – both Zimbabwean dollar notes and US dollars – are in chronically short supply due top to hyperinflation.

Last year, the government outlawed the use of US dollars in local transactions in a bid to stem speculative attacks on an interim currency that eventually paved the way for a new sovereign Zimbabwean dollar – or Zimdollar – that was introduced in November.

But the Zimdollar continued to rapidly lose value. In February, annualised inflation blew past 500 percent. And the pandemic has only boosted demand for US dollars.

Last month, after cases of COVID-19 infections were formally confirmed within Zimbabwe’s borders, the country’s central bank lifted restrictions on US dollars in local transactions to make “it easier for the transacting public to conduct business during this difficult period”.

Trish Katete, 30, is a money-changer who operates in Chikanga, a packed suburb of Mutare, the country’s fourth-largest city.

Like Mundozo, she told Al Jazeera she is continuing to ply her trade from her home through the lockdown because she simply cannot afford not to work and because customers are calling her.

“Each day I make a profit of 150 Zimdollars [$5],” she said by telephone. “I am able to pay fees for my children and to give them food.”

A brief respite for a troubled currency

As in other countries around the globe, business in Zimbabwe has inevitably slowed as COVID-19 containment measures have shuttered businesses, closed borders and sent consumers behind closed doors.

The deceleration in commerce, combined with a green light for US dollars in local transactions, has taken some of the relentless pressure off the Zimbabwean dollar.

It currently takes 25 Zimbabwean dollars to buy $1 at interbank exchange rates. On the parallel markets, the exchange rate has fallen back to 40 Zimdollars to $1, from 45 Zimdollars.

But economists say the respite for the beleaguered Zimdollar is likely only temporary.

The country’s hyperinflationary crisis has been exacerbated by drought that has left millions of people food insecure and contributed to a chronic power shortage characterised by daily blackouts.

Then there are problems that are entirely man-made.

In 2009, the country’s sovereign currency had to be abandoned altogether after years of poor policy decisions gutted agricultural exports, decimated manufacturing and saw the central bank print vast quantities of sovereign notes to finance deficit spending.

“Exchange rates are a function of money supply,” independent economist Eddie Cross told Al Jazeera. “In our case, the Reserve Bank [of Zimbabwe] has in the past printed money on a large scale to meet a state deficit, and this has destroyed the local currency.”

That legacy, says Cross, is still fresh in the mind of speculators who seek every opportunity to profit from eroding faith in Zimbabwe’s new sovereign currency.

“The traders have been able to manipulate the situation in their favour. They drive the rate down and make millions on every turn,” he said. “This has weakened the local currency, and we are now engaged in a struggle to regain lost ground.”

There are also severe structural issues working against Zimbabwe’s currency. The country has few functioning industries and relies on imports for nearly everything from food and furniture to building materials and even toothpicks.

Economist John Robertson of Robertson Economics says without export strength to bring in sufficient foreign exchange reserves, the local currency will continue to be vulnerable.

“So its value is falling and everybody would prefer to deal in US dollars,” he told Al Jazeera.

Now the coronavirus pandemic is closing borders, posing additional challenges to this heavily import-dependent nation.

“South Africa [SA] being the most affected in southern Africa, there is going to be an impact on trade between SA and Zimbabwe,” economist Persistence Gwanyanya told Al Jazeera. “[The movement of] goods from SA will be affected.”

And while that is bad news for Zimbabwe’s currency and economy, for informal money-changers like Muzodo, it means their services will likely remain in strong demand.

“I am confident the USD will [continue] trading higher than the official rate,” he said.

Zimbabwe Preparedness Roadmap for Emergency Logistics – The Zimbabwean

Food distribution in the Mutoko rural area of Zimbabwe in March.Credit…Jekesai Njikizana/Agence France-Presse — Getty Images

Zimbabwe experiences multiple natural hazards, including cyclones, drought, floods, and heavy rains. Droughts affect rural and urban food security and water supplies on an annual basis, with increased reliance on food distributions during lean seasons.

Recurring floods during the rainy season damage roads and infrastructures, particularly in remote districts. Climate change is projected to continue affecting the country. According to World Bank research, by 2050, Zimbabwe will experience a significant reduction in rainfall, river flows, and groundwater drainage, with the highest impacts on southern Zimbabwe.

Cyclone Idai crossed into Zimbabwe as a Tropical Storm on 16 March 2019 causing severe flooding and landslides. The storm caused significant damage in Chimanimani and Chipinge provinces in the Manicaland district, rendering approximately 90% of the roads and bridges in the affected areas unusable. The Logistics Cluster was activated to fill the logistics gaps in the supply chain of relief items.

As the situation improved and the response transitioned from emergency to early recovery, the Logistics Cluster scaled down its operational activities and began working towards rolling out preparedness initiatives, designed to build on lessons learned and foster collaboration and communication within the humanitarian community in Zimbabwe. The transition to logistics preparedness was supported by the Department of Civil Protection, various UN and INGO/NGO actors, national societies and the private sector.

Food insecurity resulting from the combined effects of drought and the impact of Cyclone Idai is now also highlighting challenges with supply chain, further compounded by cash and fuel shortages associated with the current economic situation. Humanitarian partners have had to move from cash donations to in-kind food provision for the first time.

The Logistics Cluster Preparedness Project aims to enable a coordinated approach towards improving local supply chain resilience in Zimbabwe. A key output is the formation of a Zimbabwe National Logistics Sector led by Government, which brings stakeholders together before an emergency to identify potential solutions, draft a common action plan, and establish a national operational team environment.

Post published in: Agriculture

Associate Salaries Cut By Up To 50 Percent At This Biglaw Firm

It’s hard out there. Beyond the health disaster that has taken hold of the nation, there is the very real economic upheaval. The financial ramifications have hit one Am Law 200 firm, in the words of a tipster, “especially hard.” At Schiff Hardin, which made $192,848,000 in 2018 gross revenue, ranking 150th on the Am Law 200, salary cuts are the order of the day, which for some attorneys will be 50 percent decreases.

While the majority of attorneys will see a 15 percent compensation cut, certain practice areas are taking an astonishing 50 percent hit. That is the largest cut to associate salaries Above the Law is tracking. The firm estimates it is 6 percent of Schiff Hardin attorneys who are taking this huge pay cut. Staff making $100,000+ will also be subject to the 15 percent cut, and they’ve laid off some staff members.

A spokesperson from Schiff Hardin provided the below statement, which details all of the cost-cutting measures the firm is taking:

Schiff Hardin is taking prudent steps to help the firm withstand the economic uncertainty created by the coronavirus pandemic. We are implementing various measures, including temporarily reducing compensation by 15% for most of our attorneys. About 6% of our attorneys will have their compensation reduced by up to 50% based on anticipated demand. We are reducing the salaries by up to 15% for staff who make more than $100,000, and a small number of staff will be laid off. We have canceled our summer program, but have extended offers to all five of our summer associates upon their graduation, and we have deferred the start of our incoming first year class until at least January 2021. These are challenging times for our attorneys and staff and we are asking everyone in the firm to make sacrifices and share the burden. We believe this is the right approach for our firm and will allow us to continue to provide quality service to our clients and ensure the strength of the law firm going forward as we weather this health and economic crisis.

Best of luck to those at the firm shouldering the worst of the austerity measures.

If your firm or organization is slashing salaries, closing its doors, or reducing the ranks of its lawyers or staff, whether through open layoffs, stealth layoffs, or voluntary buyouts, please don’t hesitate to let us know. Our vast network of tipsters is part of what makes Above the Law thrive. You can email us or text us (646-820-8477).

If you’d like to sign up for ATL’s Layoff Alerts, please scroll down and enter your email address in the box below this post. If you previously signed up for the layoff alerts, you don’t need to do anything. You’ll receive an email notification within minutes of each layoff, salary cut, or furlough announcement that we publish.


headshotKathryn Rubino is a Senior Editor at Above the Law, and host of The Jabot podcast. AtL tipsters are the best, so please connect with her. Feel free to email her with any tips, questions, or comments and follow her on Twitter (@Kathryn1).

Air Zimbabwe Flies Boeing 777 To Maintenance After 3 Months On The Ground – The Zimbabwean

However, yesterday’s flight was not the beginning of a new long haul future for Air Zimbabwe. Instead, the 777 has flown to Addis Ababa for maintenance, possibly in preparation for an impending lease.

Air Zimbabwe has flown its Boeing 777 (not pictured) for the first time! Photo: Getty Images

Air Zimbabwe’s unused 777

It was back in January when Air Zimbabwe celebrated the arrival of its Boeing 777 at the Robert Gabriel Mugabe International Airport in Harare. Coming from Malaysia Airlines, the 777-200 was not a particularly new or particularly unique aircraft, but for Air Zimbabwe, it held great significance.

This delivery, the first of two aircraft destined for the carrier, was a signal that the government was freshly committed to the future of the state-owned airline. Acting President Constantino Chiwenga even said at the time,

“Receipt of this Boeing 777 aircraft is clear testimony that we are taking concrete steps to capacitate our national airline so that it plays a role in promoting economic growth, creating jobs and facilitating international trade and tourism.”

Concrete steps maybe, but the plane itself may as well have been made out of concrete for all the activity its seen. Since January, it has flown precisely zero times. That was, until yesterday.

Flying off to Addis

Yesterday, Z-RGM, the 15-year-old pride, and joy of Air Zimbabwe took off from Harare at around 11:38 local time. It flew for just under four hours before touching down in Ethiopia at Addis Ababa.

The flight took just under four hours. Image: FlightRadar24

The aircraft was piloted not by a Zimbabwean aviator, but by a German chap by the name of Werner Heumann. He had arrived into Harare on Monday on board an Ethiopian Airlines repatriation flight. That in itself was somewhat controversial, not because he wasn’t a local, but because the locals on the trips, returning from the US and UK mostly, had to enter a 14-day quarantine on arrival. Heumann and a Swiss national on the flight did not.

Regardless of the strange piloting situation, where was the 777 going, and would it be coming back? Air Zimbabwe released a press statement regarding the movement on Twitter.

The airline’s explanation suggests that the 777 is undergoing maintenance. Ethiopian Airlines has a substantial MRO base in Addis, so that’s a plausible explanation. However, the likelihood of it ever returning to Zimbabwean soil is rather remote.

Never to return?

Air Zimbabwe has been mulling leasing this aircraft out for some time. Despite the government making the right noises about the airline back in January, it appears their commitment to a robust national airline remains shaky. In its statement, Air Zimbabwe said,

“The maintenance tasks are key in ensuring that the aircraft remains serviceable in line with the ongoing process of dry leasing the aircraft. Discussions and negotiations are at an advanced stage with potential short-listed lessees, and a final position will be officially communicated once an agreement has been signed.”

It added that it hopes to be able to make an announcement in the coming months regarding details of the lease.

Nine airlines have shown interest in leasing Air ’s two long-haul Boeing 777-200ERs acquired from in a deal expected to generate up to US$400 000 a month. Airlines is understood to be leading the pack in lease negotiations.

Previously, a representative of the administrator, Mr. Tonderai Mukubvu of Grant Thornton, had indicated there were several airlines in the running to lease the long-haul plane. He told Bulawayo24,

“Government has not made any decision on the final lessee, but we have nine suitors that have shown interest. We are at advanced stages of discussions with all suitors and they all seem capable to lease the planes from a financial capacity perspective.”

It will be interesting to see whether this Boeing 777 ever goes back to Zimbabwe or straight to a lessor from Addis. Perhaps it could even stay in Addis and begin working for the incumbent Ethiopian Airlines. Either way, with it, slated to make a cool $400,000 a month for Air Zim, it could fix up a healthier future for the floundering airline.

Post published in: Featured

Lockdown Extension? – The Zimbabwean

 

Zimbabwe has had a 21-day national lockdown starting on the 30th March 2020 and ending at midnight on Sunday 19th April.  The question in most people’s mind is:  Will the Government extend the lockdown?  Earlier this week President Emmerson Mnangagwa indicated that the Government will be reviewing the national lockdown on the 20th or the 21st April and will consider the possibility of an extension.

WHO Advice About Extending Lockdowns

Many countries that have had strict lockdowns are now deciding whether to extend them, or impose more restrictions, or ease restrictions.

The Secretary-General of the World Health Organisation last Friday advised that countries should ensure that the following criteria are met before they lift restrictions:

  • Covid-19 transmission is controlled
  • Their health systems have the capacity to detect, test, isolate and treat every case of Covid-19 and trace every contact of those infected
  • Outbreak risks are minimised in special settings
  • Preventative measures against Covid-19 infection are in place in essential places that people go to such as workplaces, schools, etc.
  • Importation risks are managed
  • Communities are fully educated and engaged to adjust to the “new norm”.

A Difficult Decision Especially for Poor Countries

Obviously Zimbabwe does not fulfil any of these criteria, so extending the lockdown seems necessary.  The spread of Covid-19 is probably just starting in Zimbabwe.  Our health services are not equipped to handle a large pandemic, therefore containing its spread is still vital.  But it needs careful thought and plans put in place.  It also need government to fully explain their decisions.  Authoritarian Governments find it easier to impose their decisions on their people but in democracies, governments need to carry the people with them in their decisions.

There is no doubt that Covid-19 is having a deadly impact on the economies of all countries affected by it and the subsequent lockdowns are necessary to prevent its spread.  Even in rich countries the choice seems to be between peoples’ lives or a plummeting economy.  Most countries have put the lives and health of their citizens first, but in a poor country where there are desperate food shortages the choice is more complex.  In Zimbabwe, where most people are in the informal economy, the impact of lockdown on their livelihoods and their networks of dependants is very great.  Social and economic cushioning is very limited in Zimbabwe, as in other poorer countries.

Many countries have had to use their security forces – usually police – to enforce lockdown restrictions, but when people are forced to break restrictions to get food or water conflict between security forces and citizens can become acute.  In Zimbabwe the conduct of the police was criticised by the President after officers were filmed burning vegetables confiscated from farmers in Mutare.  President Mnangagwa then said it was critical that food markets be allowed to function during the national lockdown.  As a consequence food markets have been exempted from the tough lockdown regulations, though this exemption has been done administratively rather than through an amendment of the relevant law.  It would have been better if the exemption had been planned in advance rather than granted off the cuff, as it were.  Food markets are crowded and social distancing is not observed, and when the exemption was granted no provision was made to protect the people thronging to them.  The police themselves have obviously not been told to take precautions and practise social distancing.

An Extension Should be Planned and Announced in Advance

Veritas strongly believes that if there is to be an extension of the national lockdown it should be announced in advance in order to prepare the members of the public, businesses, the education sector, etc.  The parameters of the restrictions should be made clear in regulations or orders and these should be made known to all law enforcement agents.

A key part of the strategy on dealing with Covid-19 that has been used in other countries is to build public trust in the leadership and the information that the public receive.  The Government should invest in a communication strategy which informs every member of society about measures that it will be taking in dealing with the pandemic.  Any extension of the lockdown must be communicated in time and its purpose explained.  Exemptions should be clear and the health of those exempted need to be fully protected.  If food markets and places where the public can get water remain open and accessible the security forces should be instructed on how they can help persuade people to practise social distancing and washing of hands and contaminated surfaces, rather than beating up people.

The Government should therefore expend energy on trust building and effective communication that allows forward planning by the public as this is key to the success of the fight against Covid-19.

Veritas makes every effort to ensure reliable information, but cannot take legal responsibility for information supplied.

Post published in: Featured

President Sleazebag Endorses Island Vacation For Guy Trying To Recover Money Other Sleazebag Stole