Morning Docket 05.01.20

* Bed Bath & Beyond has a new top lawyer. Hope she gets more than a 20% discount. [Bloomberg Law]

* The husband of the Los Angeles County District Attorney is under investigation for pointing a gun at protesters. [Los Angeles Times]

* The NCAA is facing a lawsuit alleging that it did not do enough to protect women from violence perpetrated by male athletes. [USA Today]

* The Florida Bar has launched a hotline to help attorneys dealing with stress amid the ongoing pandemic. [Daily Business Review]

* R. Kelly “didn’t believe he could fly” to Brooklyn for an arraignment on new charges, so he teleconferenced into the proceedings from his jail cell in Chicago. [New York Daily News]

* Several death row inmates in Arizona have died because of COVID-19. [NBC News]

* A Wisconsin Supreme Court Justice who lost re-election has unrecused himself. Hey, what about no backsies? [CNN]


Jordan Rothman is a partner of The Rothman Law Firm, a full-service New York and New Jersey law firm. He is also the founder of Student Debt Diaries, a website discussing how he paid off his student loans. You can reach Jordan through email at jordan@rothmanlawyer.com.

The Forum concerned with low remuneration of government employees  – The Zimbabwean

1.5.2020 7:42

Workers Day Solidarity Statement

The Zimbabwe Human Rights NGO Forum (the Forum) stands in solidarity with workers who dedicate their efforts to keep the wheels of government, industry, commerce and civil society turning through provision of labour. The Forum pays tribute to the resilience and perseverance of workers who in some cases endure unsatisfactory working conditions, earning paltry salaries amidst an ailing economy.  Workers are critical to the existence of a modern economy and are the backbone of an organised society. The Forum is concerned about the low remuneration of government employees which can barely meet the high costs of goods and services. Government teachers and health personnel have engaged the government over their remuneration and working conditions in the past year and their concerns have not been satisfactorily resolved. The Constitution of Zimbabwe in section 65(4) states that workers must have access to satisfactory working conditions. The Constitution provides in section 65(1) provides that every person has the right to fair and safe labour practices and standards and to be paid a fair and reasonable wage. The government must address the concerns of all their workers ensuring decent salaries and safe working conditions.

Workers have not been spared by the adverse effects of the COVID-19 global pandemic which led to a national lockdown which commenced on 30 March 2020 and a month later, remains in effect until the 3rd of May 2020. Many workers are belaboured by many questions of how long the lockdown will last, whether they will receive their full wages and salaries and whether will they remain in employment during and after the COVID-19 response measures. It is a period of anxiety, given the economic recession worldwide occasioned by the pandemic, and many workers are already being laid off globally. The Forum reminds employers of the need to persevere in the times, resorting to measures that ensure protection of labour rights, and that preserve the workforce and the continued existence and viability of employing entities.

The Forum stands in solidarity with health workers who resolutely stand at the frontline during this time in the fight against COVID-19, putting their lives at risk to ensure that the right to health is availed to every person. Currently, health workers nationwide are not adequately supplied with personal protective equipment. The Forum urges the government to ensure that every health worker in all the districts in Zimbabwe is supplied with personal protective equipment required for their safety in the discharge of their work. The Forum acknowledges all the workers in essential services who are committed to ensuring that basics such as food, water and access to information remain accessible to every person. As such, the Forum calls for employers to ensure that these workers are provided with personal protective equipment in line with their duties to ensure their safety.

Informal and low-income workers are at heightened risk of contracting COVID-19 as they continue to find ways to earn a living during the pandemic. The government is urged to consider effective social safety nets for informal workers to ensure their compliance with lockdown guidelines and their access to basic amenities. The Forum calls on all employers to consider the preliminary guidance from the International Labour Organization and United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) provided in the Family-Friendly Policies and other Good Workplace Practices in the Context of COVID-19: Key steps employers can take, urging employers to consider the impact of business decisions on workers’ families, and to support greater social protection wherever possible.

The Forum calls on the following:

  • The government to review salaries of government workers to ensure they are fair and reasonable in line with the high cost of living.
  • The government to provide social safety nets for informal and low-income workers including workers with disabilities.
  • The government to ensure that health workers have adequate supplies of personal protective equipment in all the 10 provinces of Zimbabwe.
  • Employers to ensure that workers providing essential services during the COVID-19 pandemic have access to personal protective equipment.
  • Employers to review existing workplace policies within their organisations to ensure they provide sufficient financial support to workers and a safe working environment during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Post published in: Business

High court sets free man imprisoned over “fake” Mnangagwa COVID-19 national lockdown extension statement – The Zimbabwean

1.5.2020 7:31

HIGH Court Judge Justice Jacob Manzunzu on Thursday 30 April 2020 ended the detention of Lovemore Zvokusekwa by granting him RTGS$1 000 bail after he was detained in prison for allegedly peddling falsehoods about President Emmerson Mnangagwa’s extension of the duration of the national lockdown period to May.

The 36 year-old Zvokusekwa of Chitungwiza petitioned the High Court
after he was denied bail by a Harare Magistrate on Monday 20 April
2020, when he appeared in court facing charges of publishing or
communicating false statements prejudicial to the state as defined in
section 31(a)(i) of the Criminal Law (Codification and Reform) Act.

Zvokusekwa, who was represented by Jeremiah Bamu of Zimbabwe Lawyers
for Human Rights and Thomas Machinga and Cecil Mutsvandiani, was
arrested on Saturday 18 April 2020 by Zimbabwe Republic Police
members, who accused him of peddling falsehoods when he reportedly
circulated a false and unsigned press statement purportedly written
and issued by President Mnangagwa titled “EXTENSION OF LOCKDOWN PERIOD
BY 13 DAYS ONLY” advising people that he had extended the national
lockdown period by 13 days from 20 April 2020 to 3 May 2020.

Zvokusekwa allegedly disseminated the false press statement on
different WhatsApp groups using his Huawei mobile phone handset and
yet President Mnangagwa had not written or signed the purported press
statement.

Apart from ordering Zvokusekwa to pay RTGS$1 000 as bail money,
Justice Manzunzu also ordered him to report once a week on Fridays at
Chitungwiza Police Station and to continue residing at his given
residential address.

He returns to court on 13 May 2020.

Post published in: Featured

Become Cult Hero of Coronavirus Times in Your Community

Decades ago, I attended a lecture series at the National Institute of Health down the street from my house, where the now ubiquitous Dr. Anthony Fauci, Director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease  was one of the speakers. Truth be told, I hardly remember the topic of Fauci’s talk, nor could I predict back then that he’d become a national cult hero — our generation’s very own Bernard Rieux, protagonist of Albert Camus’ class, The Plague. But here we are.  

Today, Fauci commands both our attention and respect because he’s a knowledgeable, trustworthy and comforting source of information in these frightening times. Even when Fauci shares bad news, he tempers it with a shot of hope.  Fauci never asked for his current notoriety – but he’s using his platform to influence policy and save lives.

You don’t need to have Fauci’s stature to attain cult hero status. Consider this recent viral video  by Dr. David Price, a doctor at Cornell Weill Medical Center in New York City who treats coronavirus patients and reassured three million viewers and counting with practical tips on avoiding infection. Viewers value Dr. Price’s video because he’s a trusted source of information but also because his advice for dealing with coronavirus is practical, measured and eminently do-able. Dr. Price’s videos empower viewers because they realize that they can take steps to effectively avoid coronavirus.

As solo and small firm lawyers, we too have the opportunity to attain similar cult status within our communities provided that we are willing to step up.  To be sure, most of us lawyers can’t help the public with health or immediate issues.  Yet, there’s much we can do to resolve uncertainty, put people at ease and make them feel that they have more control at a time when we really don’t know what tomorrow will bring.

 So what can lawyers do?  For starters, attorneys – whether you practice estate planning or not – can vet and share resources like state-sponsored health care proxies and POAs, and information on online notarization.  For clients with more complex needs, attorneys lacking estate planning experience could make referrals.

Attorneys can also dispense information on the wide range of benefits now available under recent CARES Act legislation – either to colleagues, clients or small businesses like daycare providers or dog walking services that you might be using yourself.  Many of these individuals may be unaware of the programs available to help and lawyers can serve as a resource there as well.

Finally, most jurisdictions have now adopted shelter-in-place laws now in effect across the country which are not all models of clarity. Attorneys can offer guidance on complying with the new rules.  Attorneys who practice in states where legal services have been deemed essential can explain what they are doing to keep practices open and ensuring that court cases move forward even though much of the world is shut down.  

Dr. Fauci’s brand of cult hero status – born of a long history of experience – is one that most attorneys feel at home with and frankly, one that is more appealing to most consumers than the stereotypical ambulance chaser hawking services or promoting fear on late night television commercials.  Plus, as lawyers, we have an ethical obligation to uphold the rule of law and serve the public, and a fiduciary duty to clients which enhances our trust and credibility.

Yet in spite of the special skills that we have, many lawyers are reluctant to step up. Many of us expect our bar associations to take on the task – and to be fair, many state bars have stepped up.   But bars are impersonal entities, lacking in the personal touch so evident in Dr. Fauci’s public appearances or Dr. Price’s viral video.  We solo and small firm lawyers have a chance like never before to lead with the traits that set us apart from faceless online forms and institutional biglaw: Our scrappy spirit.  Our knack for helping clients not just with legal matters, but solving their practical problems too. Our willingness to have our clients’ back no matter what.  Our all too intimate relationship with hardship.   And most of all, our humanity. 

Fellow solos and smalls, we have an opportunity to use this crisis to do the work of helping others and influencing policy that many of us went to law school to for to begin with. Now is the time to step up and stand out, to lead and inspire and comfort by experience and example. This might just be our finest hour.

Photo courtesy of Shutterstock

In Interview, Epiq CEO Addresses Ransomware Attack, Layoffs, and Company’s Future | LawSites

Following a ransomware attack that took down the company’s servers for nearly a month and then layoffs resulting from the coronavirus pandemic, the chief executive officer of Epiq Global said he is proud of how the company handled these incidents and that he expects the company to bounce back to where it was.

In an interview last Friday, CEO David C. Dobson spoke publicly for the first time about the incidents, saying he wanted to make sure the public had the facts.

“I’m very proud of how we handled these events,” Dobson said. “Handling one event is darn difficult. Handling two is almost incredible. I think – no, I don’t think – we have responded incredibly well based on the feedback from our customers, our owners and our employees. All three of those constituents have said they’re so proud of what we’ve done.”

David C. Dobson

On March 2, this blog broke the news that Epiq had shut down its servers worldwide after discovering what was later revealed to be a ransomware attack. Later, this blog also broke the news that the company had laid off some 200 employees.

Dobson took issue with some of my reporting about those incidents, disagreeing with my report that some customers were kept in the dark about the ransomware attack and disputing another report suggesting that he misled employees about the possibility of layoffs.

Previously, the company had not responded to my requests for comment about the layoffs. The company did respond in early March when I reached out for information about the ransomware attack and shutdown of its servers.

Background on the Company

Before we discussed specifics of the ransomware attack and layoffs, Dobson provided an overview of the company and himself.

Epiq as it now exists was formed in 2016 out of the combination of Epiq Systems and DTI, rebranding as Epiq in January 2018. Privately owned by two private-equity firms, OMERS Private Equity and Harvest Partners, it is a roughly $1 billion business with 6,000 employees worldwide and about the same number of customers.

The company is organized in three business units:

  • Legal Solutions accounts for half the company’s business. This encompasses services such as data collection, forensics, information governance, data processing, document review, and data hosting.
  • Class Action Remediation and Restructuring is 30% of the business. This encompasses administration of class actions, mass torts and bankruptcies. Dobson said Epiq is the largest business of this kind in the world.
  • Global Business Transformation Solutions makes up the remaining 20% of Epiq’s business. This is focused on outsourced services to large law firms such as e-discovery managed services, information technology management, records management, document production and secretarial support.

Dobson joined Epiq as CEO in January 2019, succeeding John Davenport Jr., DTI’s founder and former CEO. Although new to the legal industry, Dobson had spent his entire career in technology, including 20 years at IBM and stints as the CEO of both Corel Corporation and Digital River.

As the company entered 2020, Dobson told me, it had seen steady growth and had a strong plan for continuing that growth across all its businesses.

The Ransomware Attack

On Monday, March 2, this blog broke the news that Epiq had taken its systems offline globally after detecting unauthorized activity.

Dobson told me that he was first notified at 2 a.m. Eastern time on Saturday, Feb. 29, when the company’s CIO Carlos Gonzalez – who had just joined the company in November – called to tell him that they had detected nefarious activity in their networks.

The company acted quickly to take down its systems worldwide in order to protect client data, Dobson said, and by 9 a.m. Saturday morning, it had engaged IBM security specialists to address the intrusion and help securely bring its systems back online.

“As a result of putting into place our protocols for how we dealt with this, we were able to protect all of our clients’ information – no data was exfiltrated from our facilities,” Dobson said. “The real pain for us and our clients was that it took between 12 and 21 days to restore our systems back to where they were.”

Twelve days after the incident, Epiq began bringing some of its systems back online, but it was not until March 26 that the company was finally able to get all its systems restored.

The reason it took that long, he said, “was primarily because we did not take any shortcuts in making sure that we had no compromises to our clients’ data and made sure that we emerged from this even stronger as far as making sure that access to our systems was highly secure.”

He declined comment on whether the company paid any ransom.

My initial report said that a customer had expressed frustration over the situation to me, saying they were facing e-discovery deadlines but were unable to reach their data.

Dobson took issue with any suggestion that Epiq was not transparent with its customers throughout this time. The company immediately mobilized a crisis-management team that communicated with customers every day, he said, and it prepared FAQs to address their questions, which were updated daily as new information came in.

“We communicated very aggressively with our clients, at least once a day, sometimes twice a day. I personally was involved in more than 70 customer calls.”

The company also held a customer event by phone attended by over 320 customers at which participants could ask any question they wanted. Company executives also met twice by phone with the Legal Services Information Sharing and Analysis Organization, an organization that shares threat and vulnerability information among law firms, during which the company provided detailed information on the incident.

“I could probably put 100 customers in front of you to say how we reacted,” Dobson said. “In fact, one of the largest banks in the United States, who has thousands of suppliers, who’s had tens if not twenties of ransom attacks in their supplier base, said that Eqiq handled it in the most world class and transparent way of any of their suppliers.”

The shut-down of its systems “absolutely impacted our financials,” Dobson said. For 2-3 weeks, many clients could not access their data or send new data. While Epiq was able to set up a temporary cloud-based system on Amazon Web Services for new cases, the 100 or so cases processed there were a small fraction of what the company would normally do over that period.

“At the end of the day, it was a phishing attack that made its way through, a very sophisticated phishing attack, and we addressed it very quickly and we protected all our clients’ data.”

Layoffs and Furloughs

On April 10, I reported here that Epiq had laid off some 200 employees, with more layoffs to come. On April 20, I wrote again about the layoffs, saying that the actual number of employees affected was 400-500. I also wrote that, on March 27 – the Friday before the Monday when the layoffs began – Dobson held a company-wide meeting at which he announced pay cuts across the board but said there would be no layoffs.

In our conversation, Dobson said I got this wrong. At the March 27 meeting, he told me, he made clear to employees that there would be layoffs and furloughs.

“Wherever you got the information that I stood up and said there would not be layoffs and there would not be furloughs, that was just factually incorrect. Of all the things you reported on, that’s what I was most upset with, because you put into question my credibility with my employees.”

He did, as I reported, also announce across-the-board pay cuts, including a 100% cut of his own salary for the second quarter of the year. “I did that because I wanted to let all of our people know that the day I furlough one employee, I had to be impacted. I don’t want to not feel the pain.”

Dobson said the company has made a commitment to its employees that when it comes through this, it will reimburse them for any lost pay if it is in a position to do so. “And I have a high degree of confidence that we will be,” he said.

As to the actual number of layoffs, Dobson said that the number I reported of 400-500 was erroneous because it conflated layoffs and furloughs. The actual number of layoffs was much lower than that, he said, but he declined to specify the number.

In addition to layoffs, he said, Epiq furloughed a number of employees. Although he again declined to state the number who were furloughed on the record, he said that the total of layoffs and furloughs combined exceeded the 400-500 I reported, with the majority being furloughs, not layoffs.

These layoffs and furloughs occurred almost entirely in Epiq’s Global Business Transformation Solutions business, a services business that places professionals on-site in law firms and legal departments. That business employs 2,600 people, and as law offices shut down due to the pandemic, there was nowhere for many of these employees to go or work for them to be done, Dobson said.

The pandemic impacted each of Epiq’s three businesses very differently, Dobson said, with Global Business Transformation Solutions the hardest hit. With 2,600 employees working almost entirely on-site at customer locations, and with some 40% of U.S. law firms shutting down their physical offices, Epiq had no choice but to furlough those people, Dobson said. But he added that the majority of employees in that business unit are still on site and have not been furloughed.

“We have furloughed a large number of people,” Dobson said. “Our desire is to get all these people back into our business as quickly as possible. We’re taking a number of actions to help them through this process.”

In one of my earlier posts about the layoffs, a former employee speculated that the layoffs were the result of the double-whammy of the ransomware attack and the pandemic. But Dobson said that, for the vast majority of the layoffs, the pandemic was the sole cause.

Going Forward

Because Epiq’s Legal Solutions business – the business that is half the company’s revenue – is largely a technology business, it has seen little impact from the pandemic, Dobson said. The company has converted virtually all of its staff to remote work, and it has added new services keyed to the current crisis to help customers go through their current contracts.

While the ransomware attack did impact the company’s financials, Dobson said, the company is now starting to see a bounce back with customers sending new work and it is growing rapidly out of the “depths of March.” And while some customers were angry that they could not get access to their data during the ransomware incident, the company has not formally lost any customers because of it, he said.

“I could count on one hand, of my thousands of customers, how many I think will choose not to do business with us going forward.”

Dobson said he is confident that Epiq’s business is getting back on track. By the end of the quarter, he expects the flow of new work coming into the company’s two largest businesses to be back where it was before the ransomware attack.

“We’ve seen strong growth in April over March and we think we’ll be back on our growth plan within a quarter, to where we were before we got into this.”

While the company already had a sophisticated security schema in place before the attack, it has now added even stronger measures, Dobson said. In addition, while all employees were previously trained in network and data security, the company has put them all through a rigorous retraining.

Acknowledging that employees are “the weakest link” in protecting against phishing, Dobson said that Epiq has gone to great lengths to train employees and put in additional world-class products to secure its systems.

Still, he concedes that the company’s future is dependent on how the current crisis plays out and how long it lasts. The company is working through various scenarios based on how long the crisis might last and how best to support its employees.

“We’ve got a whole set of actions that we’ll take to make sure that we, number one, support our employees, number two, support services to our clients, and number three, make sure that we are always in a position of strong financial health.”

With so much of Epiq’s business contingent on the courts, one factor beyond its control is how quickly they resume operations.

“We don’t’ know whether this virus will come back in the fall, but we’ve completely repositioned Epiq to deliver all of our services virtually now,” Dobson said. “Only if the courts slow down and there’s a supply-side issue with matters not moving through the courts will we see any type of dip in our business.”

“I can’t control the rate and pace of the courts, whether judges will move new matters through or not,” he said. “That’s the big unknown for our business.”

The Plan To Reopen Biglaw (And The Rest Of The Legal Profession)

How the world reopens post COVID-19 is something on everyone’s mind. Most people are struggling to weigh the lack of adequate testing and the lack of vaccine immediately available with the overwhelming sense that lock down just can’t go on for forever. And figuring out exactly how the legal profession will open back up is something currently being worked on.

The New York State Bar Association has taken the stance that law firms should open up even before other non-essential businesses and has created a “Restarting the Economy Working Group” to make recommendations to policymakers on “the safest and most efficient way for law firms to reopen.”

Hank Greenberg, the president of the state bar and a partner at Greenberg Traurig, told Law.com that getting lawyers back in their offices is a top priority:

“It’s not Hank Greenberg just beating the drum for lawyers,” he said in a Wednesday interview. “The rule of law is dependent on lawyers. We are the footsoldiers of the Constitution. We are utterly vital and essential to society.”

Of course, like lots of white-collar workers, lawyers are, by and large, able to work from home. But Greenberg believes that there is something important about getting the door back open:

“It is absolutely true that we can do a lot of our work remotely … and I think we will continue to do a lot of our work remotely,” he continued. But “from an economic perspective, having the legal profession be able to function, survive the crisis, and flourish is critical. If lawyers can’t work, if lawyers can’t make a living, if lawyers are not in a position to help clients, that is a direct threat to the vibrancy of the rule of law.”

David Schraver, of counsel at Nixon Peabody and a member of the working group, said safety would be paramount as they deal with the different office spaces of different size firms across the state:

“One of the issues is that there are so many different types of law offices across the state,” he said. “There are large firms in multistory buildings that have conference rooms of all different sizes and shapes, and there are solo and small-firm practices across the state that have much different kinds of offices.”

He also noted it is too early to know what recommendations the working group would make.


headshotKathryn Rubino is a Senior Editor at Above the Law, and host of The Jabot podcast. AtL tipsters are the best, so please connect with her. Feel free to email her with any tips, questions, or comments and follow her on Twitter (@Kathryn1).

Has The Coronavirus Crisis Changed The Way Your Law Firm Manages Transactions?

(Image via Getty)

The COVID-19 pandemic is reshaping the world as we know it. Every industry has been impacted, and the legal arena is no different. Transaction management –historically a paper- and labor-intensive endeavor — is facing unprecedented challenges. Given the current pace of change to law firm practices, Above the Law and Litera have partnered to get a better sense of exactly how firms are responding to the outbreak and what tools legal professionals are using to help them reprioritize and reconfigure their workflows and client relationships.

As such, we are fielding a brief survey that is looking for insights into topics such as:

  • Preparedness to handle changes;
  • Concerns regarding the deal management process;
  • Evolution of client requests; and
  • Impact on deal completion.

Tenth Circuit Affirms Kansas’s Kris Kobach Is NOT GREAT AT LAW

(Photo by Steve Pope/Getty Images)

Kris Kobach is a lot of things. He’s a former Kansas Secretary of State, a Breitbart opinion writer, a senate candidate, and he led the president’s spectacularly unsuccessful commission to prove the existence of widespread voter fraud. Kobach marketed his legal services to small towns hoping to implement his handcrafted voter ID laws, only to find themselves stuck with millions of dollars in attorneys fees after courts blocked the statutes as unconstitutional. A graduate of Harvard, Yale, and Oxford, Kobach even managed to lose the 2018 gubernatorial election to a Democrat in blood red Kansas — which is no mean feat!

But Kris Kobach is not a good trial lawyer. And his effort to defend Kansas’s proof of citizenship law in federal court netted him a contempt finding, a judicially mandated stint in remedial legal education, and a $1,000 fine for “deliberately attempting to mislead the court.” A fine which he paid using a state-issued credit card.

The case was a debacle, marked by Kobach’s spectacularly inept attempts to introduce excluded and unsubstantiated evidence at trial and certify partisan hacks as expert witnesses. Unsurprisingly, Kobach got spanked by the ACLU, with the trial judge ruling that Kansas’s proof of citizenship voter ID law disenfranchised 30,000 eligible voters to keep 39 ineligible voters off the rolls, which could not colorably be said to make Kansas’s elections more fair.

U.S. District Judge Julie Robinson enjoined the state from forcing voters to prove citizenship with a passport or birth certificate, finding that the requirement violated both the National Voter Registration Act and the Fourteenth Amendment. And yesterday, the Tenth Circuit affirmed Judge Robinson’s decision, upholding her finding that Kansas’s law violates the NVRA.

Naturally, Kris Kobach has #Thoughts.

Why can’t those federal judges learn to law good like Kris Kobach! Why are those darn activist jurists looking at those 30,000 citizens too poor or elderly to afford passports who wouldn’t be able to vote?

It’s a perversion!

“Some of those individuals were not actually U.S. citizens, so they never should have been registered,” Kobach told the Kansas City Star, continuing his tradition of evidence-free assertions. “So for the court to seize on that 30,000 figure shows that the court didn’t actually understand how the law operated.”

It’s not clear whether the state will ask for en banc review or appeal the ruling to the Supreme Court. But if it does, Kobach is sure it will prevail, telling the Star, “The opinion is clearly wrong and I have a high level of confidence that it will be overturned by the Supreme Court if the Attorney General appeals it to the Supreme Court.”

And if Kris Kobach says it, you can take that to the bank. Because that guy’s legal judgment is as sound as the Liberty Bell!

Federal court rejects Kansas’ appeal, says Kobach-crafted law disenfranchised 30,000 [KC Star]


Elizabeth Dye (@5DollarFeminist) lives in Baltimore where she writes about law and politics.