When Lawyers Get Sued – Learn How To Protect Your Firm

Live Webinar:
Date: May 28, 2020
Time: 1 p.m. ET / 10 a.m. PT

Eighty percent of lawyers will get sued for legal malpractice in their careers, and sometimes insurance doesn’t even respond. Owners need to pay attention to other exposures like employment suits, cybersecurity, and other exposures today.

This 60-minute webinar is designed to boil it all down and make insurance a bit less painful and confusing:

  • What are the key exposures for law firms?
  • How can you avoid getting claims declined?
  • What can be done to reduce insurance rates?

Embroker will share transparent information to help you better run your firm. Join Brad Barkin, VP of Law and Accounting of Embroker, and Bob Ambrogi, lawyer and legal journalist, as they discuss the radical way law firms can find the right insurance.

By submitting the form below, you are opting in to receive communication from Above the Law and its partners.

Stephen Susman Recovers From Coma And Leaves Hospital

After a scary stretch, Susman Godfrey founder Stephen Susman has awoken from the coma he entered after a late April bike crash.

It’s not clear exactly when Susman got out of the coma and left the hospital, but he’s now in recovery at TIRR Memorial Hermann, the famous physical rehab center.

All of us at Above the Law are happy to hear that Susman is on the mend.

Susman Godfrey Founder Steve Susman Is Out of Coma, In Recovery After Bicycle Accident

Earlier: Susman Godfrey Founder Seriously Injured


HeadshotJoe Patrice is a senior editor at Above the Law and co-host of Thinking Like A Lawyer. Feel free to email any tips, questions, or comments. Follow him on Twitter if you’re interested in law, politics, and a healthy dose of college sports news. Joe also serves as a Managing Director at RPN Executive Search.

Know Your Case Way Before Trial By Doing Trial Preparation Early

(Photo by Fred Prouser-Pool/Getty Images)

Recently, my colleagues and I used Zoom (like everyone) to hold a mock trial. Different lawyers opened, and others acted as witnesses, either as themselves as they would be in the eventual trial, or as our adversaries (who we have somewhat gotten to know, and who we enjoyed pretending to be). We used the Zoom screen-sharing feature to put exhibits in front of the witnesses and all of that.

The trial isn’t scheduled until late 2021.

Given that last fact — that we have forever until trial and, indeed, we are nowhere near done with discovery, let alone know what dispositive motions we will have to deal with, or, of course, whether we will have a real settlement discussion — why would my colleagues and I devote the time and resources now to preparing for trial? It’s simple: because that’s what you need to do to win.

To be clear, when I write “win,” I mean it as we do at our firm: get the best result for the client, whatever that result is. Sometimes that result is getting rid of the fight. Sometimes it’s fighting only for a short while, as that has some collateral benefit to the client (in particular, in commercial litigation). Sometimes it does indeed mean pushing the case to trial or to an evidentiary hearing before an arbitration tribunal and getting a victory at that trial or hearing.

But even if a win for your client doesn’t mean going all the way to trial, you need to be ready to — since it may happen — and by preparing for trial in the early stages of the case, you will do a better job throughout the case, and be more likely to get the client to that win, and get the client there faster. We all think we know our cases. But then when a good lawyer puts on her devil’s advocate cap and examines one of your side’s witnesses you may see, for the first time, some real weaknesses: maybe the witness comes off poorly; maybe you realize you don’t have a good explanation for some conduct; maybe you realize there are things you just don’t know. Like anyone, we can get into a herd mentality about our cases (and, indeed, that’s why at our firm we are huge fans of using mock jurors from the community who really know nothing about the case and aren’t lawyers). By forcing yourself to think like your adversary and go through the motions, even a little, of the end determination of merits, you can make sure you learn.

Some of us, these days, unfortunately aren’t too busy. Many of us, thankfully, are. But challenging your case by mooting it out this way is something we all need to make time to do if we want to win for our clients.


john-balestriereJohn Balestriere is an entrepreneurial trial lawyer who founded his firm after working as a prosecutor and litigator at a small firm. He is a partner at trial and investigations law firm Balestriere Fariello in New York, where he and his colleagues represent domestic and international clients in litigation, arbitration, appeals, and investigations. You can reach him by email at john.g.balestriere@balestrierefariello.com.

The Week We Learned That Clarence Thomas Is Really Into Hobbits

After years of diligent silence during oral argument, Justice Clarence Thomas has already piped up twice since the Supreme Court started livestreaming arguments. It’s almost as if the notoriously disengaged jurist has spent the last 29 years waiting for an audience. Perhaps this is why the Court remained so steadfastly opposed for so long.

While hearing argument on Colorado Department of State vs. Baca, the faithless elector case, Thomas jumped in to ask counsel if there could be any check on an elector’s discretion:

“The elector, who had promised to vote for the winning candidate, could suddenly say ‘you know, I’m going to vote for Frodo Baggins. I really like Frodo Baggins,’” said Thomas. “And you’re saying, under your system, you can’t do anything about that.”

As Jason Harrow, the attorney for the faithless elector from 2016, immediately pointed out, this question is remarkably stupid since electors have to vote for real people. Also, if Hawaiian birth certificates couldn’t be trusted, good luck dealing with the bureaucracy of the Shire.

Unfortunately the other side picked up on this strawhobbit argument and cited it later in the argument as proof that electors cannot be legally bound by states lest mischief ensue. It was a disingenuous jab but at least it helps the right side. Efforts to replace the archaic role of the Electoral College with one that simply hands the presidency to the winner of the popular vote hinge on the power of states to keep electors faithful so if it takes freaking out over halflings to get that result, so be it.

But all this raises more interesting questions about Clarence Thomas: Low-Key High-Fantasy Nerd. The references people deploy can reveal a lot about who they are. He could’ve asked about Jay Gatsby or Gregor Samsa or a Republican who opposes de facto segregation — they’re all fictional characters, so why does his mind jump to the hero of the Lord of the Rings trilogy? There are a lot of reasons to appreciate Tolkien, but the fantasy genre does feed a Manichaean worldview, an unhealthy romanticization and whitewashing of the past, and a politics that sees people as defined by birth — dwarves are violent miners because they’re dwarves and not because they live in economically distressed mountain communities. Not that there aren’t other reasons to appreciate the books, but if he’s the sort of superfan ready to drop Frodo in a Supreme Court argument it certainly suggests he’s thought a little more deeply about the books than people probably should and now that it’s been highlighted, it’s hard not to see these strains in his jurisprudence.

Does Justice Thomas see his Supreme Court as an ersatz Fellowship? Perhaps one he envisions as sent on a grand quest to destroy the One Ring, or “voting rights” as we call them? In this model, I assume Roberts holds the Fellowship together as its Gandalf, Alito is believable exuding that Samwise sidekick-y vibe, Kavanaugh doing the Boromir thing and trying to take stuff without consent.

But seriously, is Thomas a big Tolkien guy? Or is this more of a Zeppelin thing where he’s only vaguely following the plot from the lyrics of epic ballads about love and longing and Hobbits? So many questions.

Wait, did Long Dong Silver ever do a Lord of the Rings parody?

SUPREME COURT JUSTICE CLARENCE THOMAS DISCUSSES FRODO BAGGINS DURING ELECTORAL COLLEGE ORAL ARGUMENT [Newsweek]

Earlier: Clarence Thomas Speaks During Supreme Court’s First Ever Remote Oral Arguments


HeadshotJoe Patrice is a senior editor at Above the Law and co-host of Thinking Like A Lawyer. Feel free to email any tips, questions, or comments. Follow him on Twitter if you’re interested in law, politics, and a healthy dose of college sports news. Joe also serves as a Managing Director at RPN Executive Search.

Big Thoughts From An Industry Visionary

When it comes to thought leaders in the legal industry, they don’t come much bigger than Mark Harris. Twenty years ago, Harris co-founded Axiom, now one of the biggest, oldest, and heaviest-hitting Alternative Legal Service Providers in the world. These days he’s running a spin-off entity called Knowable, which is focused on contract management. Few can claim to have changed an entire industry, but he’s one of them.

So when Mark Harris pens an open letter to the business world, as he did this week, it merits attention. Harris generously shared a draft of the letter that he and Alec Guettel, Knowable’s CFO and Axiom’s co-founder, wrote. He also granted me an interview ahead of publication. It’s a heck of a conversation piece.

While I’d recommend reading the letter in full, its central insight is a practical one: “Large companies are constructed of hundreds of thousands of commercial arrangements in all directions[.]” In the abstract, we all expect COVID-19 to place an immense strain on those arrangements as supply and demand sharply rise and fall, as customers or suppliers go out of business, and as consumers change their basic habits.

What Harris teases out is that our responses to these changes will be dictated and constrained by the contracts our companies have entered into, but most companies have little or no idea at any given moment what’s included in those contracts. While most companies will soon have an urgent need to review and understand their contractual obligations, far too many struggle to even find copies of the relevant agreements once they need them. If the basic contract can be found, pulling together the various addenda, modifications, waivers and such that tend to accrete over a business relationship can be more difficult still.

Harris witnessed the disaster that played out in the 2008 financial crisis. As the stock market tumbled and mortgage-backed securities collapsed, “… the banks were paralyzed. It wasn’t that they themselves were in financial peril, it was that they were contractually committed to all kinds of other institutions and had obligations in this complicated web of commitments and promises and dependencies, and it was completely opaque to them… . It did get sorted out, and the regulators parachuted in for the next six or seven years, and it turns out that having more visibility into their contractual commitments made their businesses a lot better.”

Harris and Knowable are offering a solution to the problem they see coming. As a response to COVID-19, and in anticipation of the difficulties the business world is gearing up to face, Knowable is offering a basic version of its contract management software to all companies free of charge. Harris is up-front that the offer is equal parts altruistic gesture to help struggling businesses and a self-serving effort to onboard new customers. Both in his open letter and in our conversation, Harris was thoughtful about trying to combine compassion with  business-savvy. At the same time this product is being made available free of charge, Knowable has ceased sales calls to potential new customers out of the sense that doing so would be tone-deaf and off-putting. “While we’re sensitive to that, we’re not ashamed of it,” he told me. “What I believe in more than anything is a for-profit company out to do good, out to actually help and solve real problems. It’s understanding that the point of the game is to win, but to win for the right reasons and in the right ways.”

Harris’ anxiety reflects the difficult needle that business leaders are having to thread during this likely generation-defining crisis. The biggest cost of this pandemic is indisputably the human one. Keeping ourselves, our loved ones, and our coworkers healthy while caring for the sick and bereaved is, and should be, our first priority. But while the economic impacts of the crisis may not be the most damaging, they are nonetheless important to mitigate. Doing what we reasonably and safely can to keep people employed and mitigate the economic damage will help prevent second-order suffering down the road. Knowable’s free offer will, Harris hopes, help some businesses better weather the storm, better take care of their employees, and better lift the country back up once we’re through the worst of this.

Like any visionary, Harris sees the upheaval caused by COVID-19 as an opportunity for betterment. “The greatest obstacle most companies have is that they’re fighting inertia,” he told me. “In the short term, it’ll be paralysis and chaos. I think in the medium- to long-term, however, this will open hearts and minds to doing things in a different, smarter, better way… . Freelance working and virtual working are going to be far more accepted” once the world settles into its new normal.

For the founder of one of the legal industry’s biggest Alternative Legal Service Providers, Harris remains surprisingly bullish on the future of law firms themselves. “Law firms take a lot of punishment, particularly in the sort of circles I travel in, but I think the reality is they’re a pretty good business model. They’ve endured pretty well.” Harris also breaks from the convention that firms should continue to consolidate and grow into larger and larger entities. “I think law firms work better as partnerships. I think when partners feel like partners, as opposed to midlevel managers at a multinational corporation, I think they just function better, culturally and from a performance standpoint, from a customer experience standpoint. And I think they control their financial statements in a way that puts them on much better footing and leaves them less vulnerable when the world swings in violently.”

If there’s one thing that resonated for me out of Harris’ open letter and our conversation, it’s a similar theme that has been emerging out of the past few columns I’ve written. COVID-19 is making us realize how what we think of as monolithic businesses and industries are really just a series of connections between people. The contracts that define our conduct are, at heart, a group of people sitting down and agreeing to make each other better off. It’s people deciding to build something together that make up our companies. It’s people that take care of one another in times of crisis.

We are who we surround ourselves with and who we look out for during difficult times.


James Goodnow

James Goodnow is an attorneycommentator, and Above the Law columnist. He is a graduate of Harvard Law School and is the managing partner of NLJ 250 firm Fennemore Craig. He is the co-author of Motivating Millennials, which hit number one on Amazon in the business management new release category. As a practitioner, he and his colleagues created a tech-based plaintiffs’ practice and business model. You can connect with James on Twitter (@JamesGoodnow) or by emailing him at James@JamesGoodnow.com.

Deutsche Bank’s Money Laundering Controls Still Need A Touch Of Work

Morning Docket: 05.15.20

* Attorneys associated with the Trial Lawyers College are currently embroiled in litigation. It would be amazing if this case went to trial… [Bloomberg Law]

* An ex-lawyer from Atlanta, who hired a hitman to murder his wife, has died of natural causes in prison. [Daily Mail]

* Check out a behind-the-scenes look at a lawyer featured on the new Netflix show Trial by Media. Haven’t gotten to that episode yet. [NBC News]

* A New York City judge has denied Mary-Kate Olsen’s request for an emergency divorce, even though she may be forced out of her apartment. Guess she can always crash with Ashley. [Fox News]

* An appeals court has refused to dismiss an emoluments lawsuit against President Trump, setting up a battle at the Supreme Court. [Business Insider]

* The L.A. City Attorney is suing the maker of a radish paste that allegedly provides protection from COVID-19. Sounds kind of like the Carbolic Smoke Ball, haven’t thought about that fact pattern since law school. [Los Angeles Times]


Jordan Rothman is a partner of The Rothman Law Firm, a full-service New York and New Jersey law firm. He is also the founder of Student Debt Diaries, a website discussing how he paid off his student loans. You can reach Jordan through email at jordan@rothmanlawyer.com.

MP dumped in a pit and brutally assaulted – The Zimbabwean

Joana Mamombe

With anxiety and excitement, I headed out onto the open road one day this week; everything was in order: travel permit, face mask on, hand sanitizer and gloves at the ready. I had anxiety for what I suspected I would see and excitement at seeing what I knew I had missed; I was not wrong on either count.

It was day 43 of Zimbabwe’s Coronavirus lockdown, a beautiful day with a blue sky that stretched to the horizon and roads lined with the golden grass of winter. The highways had been taken over by trucks labouring up the hills, giving me a chance to glance out the windows and soak in the spectacle. Just as they had been 43 days ago, there were the timeless, beautiful kopjes, the Mukwa trees covered with fried egg pods, an eagle soaring high in the deep blue sky and, standing proud and alert on a rock, a big male baboon, his tale arched, the lookout. Oh Zimbabwe, how I missed you.

Children who should be in school were herding cattle on the edges of the road, waving in response to my greeting as I passed, eyes wide at the sight of the face mask, our new, impersonal reality. In common with children all over the world they’ve been out of school for over two months now but unlike other children, most here don’t have laptops, internet connections, online learning, electricity or even books at home and so their education has just completely stopped.

In a rock pool on a river women were bent over washing clothes. On a bridge over a sluggish olive green river a thin woman sat on the tarmac, collecting maize pips that had fallen off a passing truck. Carefully she put them in a small enamel bowl at her side and my eyes stung with tears. How much longer must Zimbabweans live this, because this isn’t Coronavirus hunger this is just plain hunger from drought exacerbated by a toxic cocktail of punitive economic policies and taxes that have impoverished our entire nation.

Strikingly absent everywhere were the thousands of men and women who make their living on the roadsides, their home-made wooden tables and stalls empty, not allowed to sell their bowls of bright red tomatoes, pockets of butternuts and potatoes, bunches of orange carrots. Every now and again alone vendor braves the police and sits on a stump with his tomatoes, ready to run into the golden grass. How are they surviving, is anyone helping them, are their vegetables going rotten in the fields?

Tragically the promised financial assistance of Z$200 each for vulnerable families affected by the Coronavirus lockdown, pledged by government on March 30, 2020, has still not materialized. Six weeks ago the Minister of Finance said a Z$600 million fund would support “one million vulnerable households under a cash transfer programme and payment will commence immediately.” That didn’t happen and at the time of writing not a cent has been disbursed. Social Welfare minister Paul Mavima said they were busy verifying people to make sure they really were vulnerable and once that was done the payments would be made. Six weeks later and you still can’t see who’s in trouble? What can I say except look into people’s sunken, desperate eyes and you will know? But that’s not quite the end of this absurd story. Now we are told that the promised Z$200 for vulnerable people has been increased to Z$300 which today is only worth US$6, enough to buy two packets of non-existent sugar and one loaf of bread with money that is so far non-existent anyway. What a disgrace, but it was still to get much worse.

Exposing the government’s lack of assistance to vulnerable and needy families during the lockdown, a small protest was held in Harare this week. Afterwards, three MDC officials who had been in the protest were allegedly abducted at a roadblock near the National Sports Stadium in Harare. MDC MP Joana Mamombe, Youth Vice Chairperson Cecilia Chimbiri and Deputy Organising Secretary Netsai Marova disappeared. In the hours that followed Zimbabwe Lawyers for Human Rights checked at numerous police stations but there was no sign of the women. The British and American Embassies expressed their concern publicly; the Police said they did not have the women in custody and so, again, Zimbabwe feared the worst, remembering the disappearance and torture of Doctor Peter Magombeyi some months ago. This morning the three women were found, dumped at Muchapondwa shops in Bindura. Rescued and now receiving medical attention their horrific stories are being revealed, heads covered with hoods, driven in a car into the bush, dumped in pit and brutally assaulted.

At the end of this sickening story we can only assume that the people behind the abduction and torture of three women are not hungry, haven’t got family members who are picking up maize pips on the roadside for supper, haven’t lost their jobs, haven’t had their salaries cut by half, aren’t watching their tomatoes going rotten in the fields, and aren’t concerned about catching or spreading Coronavirus.
Until next time, thanks for reading this Letter From Zimbabwe, now in its 20th year, and my books about life in Zimbabwe, a country in waiting, love cathy 15 May 2020. Copyright © Cathy Buckle.  http://cathybuckle.co.zw/
For information on my books about Zimbabwe go to www.lulu.com/spotlight/ CathyBuckle2018. For archives of Letters From Zimbabwe, to see pictures that accompany these articles and to subscribe/unsubscribe or to contact me please visit my website http://cathybuckle.co.zw/

Post published in: Featured

Three MDC young cadres found badly bruised and traumatised – The Zimbabwean

They are in very bad shape and they have told horrendous tales of torture and abuse. Hon. Mamombe and Netsai Marova are having difficulty in walking while Cecilia Chimbiri is complaining of severe head pains.

They are currently being assisted to check into a medical facility in the presence of lawyers and the police.

After receiving a distress phone call from the dumped cadres who had been accommodated by a sympathetic villager in Muchapondwa, a group of MDC officials that included Secretary for Welfare Maureen Kademaunga and deputy Organing secretary Hon. Happymore Chidziva immediately alerted lawyers and the police and drove to the area in Bindura South where they found the three cadres in very bad shape.

They are heavily traumatised.

They were found dumped near Muchapondwa shops, popularly known as “paSupa”.

According to the party’s rescue team that drove to Bindura with lawyers and the police , the three ladies said they were first taken to Harare Central Police station after being “arrested.” They were later taken from the police station and were driven away in a black Wish vehicle. The men who drove them away covered the ladies’ faces with what looked like sacks. They remember being taken to a forest and being put in a pit where they were brutally assaulted.

They are telling horrendous stories of abuse and humiliation that include being forced to eat human excreta.

They are currently checking into a medical facility , under the close watch of MDC officials, a team of lawyers and some nine police officers from the Law and Order section.

The ladies are still heavily traumatised and their clothes are torn.

Luke Tamborinyoka
Deputy National Spokesperson

Post published in: Featured