Accounting Firms Should Do Better Job Of Detecting Fraud, Says Accounting Firm Doing A Terrible Job Of Detecting Fraud

Morning Docket: 09.16.20

* The New York Attorney General has announced a settlement with Dunkin’ over a security breach. I don’t mind others knowing how much pumpkin coffee I’ve been drinking… [CBS News]

* Oral arguments at New York’s highest court were canceled earlier this month because one of the attorneys had a high temperature. [Brooklyn Eagle]

* The Justice Department is looking into whether John Bolton (not Michael Bolton) improperly divulged confidential information in his new book. [Fox News]

* A Texas lawyer has pleaded guilty to smuggling drugs into a jail. [CBS News]

* Facebook apparently may be subject to an antitrust lawsuit sometime this year. MySpace is still a competitor of theirs…. right? [Yahoo News]

* The family of Breonna Taylor has settled their claims against the City of Louisville, Kentucky, for $12 million. [CNN]

* A new lawsuit asserts Bud Light’s Lime-A-Ritas falsely suggest they have tequila. Maybe Bud can assert the “beer before liquor, never sicker” defense. [Fox News]


Jordan Rothman is a partner of The Rothman Law Firm, a full-service New York and New Jersey law firm. He is also the founder of Student Debt Diaries, a website discussing how he paid off his student loans. You can reach Jordan through email at jordan@rothmanlawyer.com.

Now That’s What You Call A Special Bonus! — See Also

Finally, the Functional PDF Software Lawyers Want and Need

Finally, the Functional PDF Software Lawyers Want and Need

PDFs have long been a staple of legal practice, but one that has caused more than its fair share of unnecessary headaches. The thought of dealing with PDFs causes many lawyers an immediate sense of dread. But what if I told you that PDFs are actually easy to edit, but you’ve just been using the […]

PDFs have long been a staple of legal practice, but one that has caused more than its fair share of unnecessary headaches. The thought of dealing with PDFs causes many lawyers an immediate sense of dread. But what if I told you that PDFs are actually easy to edit, but you’ve just been using the […]

E-Discovery Platform Relativity Announces Next-Gen Aero User Interface

E-Discovery software company Relativity announces this week the release of their Aero user interface, a sleek and powerfully new way to navigate documents and data in an industry-leading e-discovery platform. I spent some time recently with the product team and was privileged to see an early demo of the new UI. Because I have not logged into a Relativity workspace for a few years, I learned some things, and I think users will appreciate the new developments as well.

Remember all those tabs across the top of the interface? Gone. Remember how you had to scroll over or select another object to see more options? Gone. Menus have been moved to the left side of the interface in what can only be described as a more functional navigation pane. Click on the little hamburger icon on the bottom-left and it opens access to all menu options.

Rolled out in August to some customers and available more widely this month, Aero will be introduced first in the Relativity One environment.

I pressed the Relativity team on what exactly makes Aero Aero. For me, the name invokes thoughts of flight, spaciousness, and perhaps speed. For the development team at Relativity, the name Aero is not just marketing fluff. “This marks the biggest release of a product update in the history of the company,” Relativity Group Manager Kyle Disterheft told me. “This is more than just a face lift. It is the first release in which we demonstrate how big a deal the user experience is. Aero has the most new features of any prior release and has been tested more widely,” Disterheft added. More than 6,000 new workspaces containing over 700,000 documents are currently using the new Aero UI.

Aero is the culmination of ideas that help tell the story of how Relativity designs and builds software. From what I saw of the new UI, it appears that better, faster, more intuitive navigation was very much in mind. “We literally measured the linear feet of required mouse movement to enable faster navigation,” Disterheft said.

Navigation aside, Relativity has also fundamentally rebuilt the viewer to improve performance. New architecture allows the viewer to immediately load the first few pages of a document while the rest of the document is streaming behind the scenes. This improves document load times and makes page-to-page navigation nearly instantaneous. Relativity is reporting median document jump speeds have improved from 3.8 to 0.4 seconds and forms now load 40% faster.

I asked Liz Lieberman, the product marketing manager for Relativity, to describe a few of the tangible differences that users will see in Aero. “Modern aesthetics, a next-generation viewer, better workflow navigation, and faster performance.”

I did encounter a number of aesthetic alterations during a demo session. In addition to new fonts, colors, and icons, all of the layout and forms pages have been updated. “It’s not just the ‘look and feel’ we’ve updated,” Lieberman said.  “We’ve also improved how users navigate between pages and how they accomplish tasks — all of which follow a more logical workflow,” she added. “And eventually, we’ll be automating tasks like ingestion, processing, and OCR.”

Don’t take my word for it. I also spoke to several Relativity customers who have been using the Aero UI for several months. Liraz Kolnik, the e-discovery operations manager at Control Risks, described Areo as faster, more stable, easier to navigate. “The design of Aero is sleek and makes the platform easier to use. With Aero UI, the quality of life in the system is much higher. Navigation alone is significantly superior and allows the user to more simply and clearly navigate around a workspace.”

In a press release, Relativity’s Chief Product Officer Chris Brown said that one goal of the Aero UI was to improve the user experience by working with customers to improve the UI. Matthew Nelson, the director of litigation support at Littler Mendelson, said, “The Aero team really has done a great job in design and also responding to user feedback and suggestions.” Control Risks’ Kolnik also praised the Relativity development team for working closely with this team and listening to feedback.

Others are praising the Aero UI as well. Jenna Rooney, director of client services at Array (formerly Innovative Litigation) was incredibly enthusiastic. Her team has been using the Aero UI since April. “Relativity has made incredible changes and improvements,” she said. “Ease of use, less buttons; the improved functionality has been a game changer.”

Admittedly, I have not used a Relativity workspace for a few years. But from what I saw during the demo and what I learned from those I spoke to in the past few weeks, Relativity seems to have hit a new stride in software development — one in which customers have a voice.

To learn more about the Aero UI, register for Relativity Fest, the annual user conference for all things Relativity. This year’s conference is virtual and is entirely free to everyone.


Mike Quartararo

Mike Quartararo is the President of the Association of Certified E-Discovery Specialists (ACEDS), a professional member association providing training and certification in e-discovery. He is also the author of the 2016 book Project Management in Electronic Discovery and a consultant providing e-discovery, project management and legal technology advisory and training services to law firms and Fortune 500 corporations across the globe. You can reach him via email at mquartararo@aceds.org. Follow him on Twitter @mikequartararo.

3 Questions For A Litigation Finance Consultant (Part II)

This week, I continue my written interview with Rebecca Berrebi of litigation finance consultancy Avenue 33 LLC, regarding her experience in the legal industry and her decision to launch her new firm. Please see below for Rebecca’s answers to my second and third questions, focused on her view of the rapidly evolving field of litigation finance, especially in light of the stress on legal budgets presented by the COVID-19 pandemic.

As usual, I have added some brief commentary to Rebecca’s answers below but have otherwise presented her answers as she provided them.

GK: 2) Where do you see the litigation funding industry heading over the next few years?

RB: This largely unregulated industry is growing and evolving so quickly — the litigation finance market from six months ago is already different today. First, particularly in response to the pandemic, companies are becoming increasingly interested in using litigation finance as a tool for monetizing assets and smart accounting. Second, as more investors are recognizing the potential value of litigation as a non-market correlated asset, the funding class is expanding from the traditional, single-mandate third-party finance shops to include larger, multistrategy, and special-situations funds, as well as family offices. Finally, more and more law firms are opening up to the possibility of using funding as a way to grow their client base without risking their own bottom line.

But, with growth comes challenges. I expect litigants will ultimately demand more transparency into transaction structure and pricing from funders, and lawyers will face more stringent guidelines for dealing with conflicts, ethics, and confidentiality concerns. As recently as August of 2020, the American Bar Association released a controversial “Best Practices for Third-Party Litigation Funding,” suggesting guidelines that lawyers should follow when dealing with a case that is financed by outside sources; this type of proposed regulation and ensuing debate will continue.  While regional funders outside of the U.S., including the Association of Litigation Funders of England and Wales, have already developed, a larger collective of global third-party financiers, the International Legal Finance Association, just publicly launched as of September 8, 2020.

Despite a lack of a united influence to-date and public disclosure in the industry, at Avenue 33, we do, and will continue to, closely monitor the market and the players so we can advise our clients with well-informed, current information. We also keep up with the expansion of service offerings, so we know what additional providers may be helpful and cost-effective to supplement current efforts. And, as in any developing industry, using an industry expert as a consultant to advise on the particular concerns of the moment can only serve to diminish uncertainty and create value for all stakeholders.

GK: Rebecca makes a compelling case in my view for having expert guidance when it comes to litigation finance. Her characterization of the field (at least in the United States) as a “developing industry” is apt and there is definitely room in the market for someone with an insider’s perspective to consult on prospective deals. As anyone who has interacted with litigation funders knows, once the sheen of the music-to-a-lawyer’s ears of someone willing to pay their bills wears off, the hard work of arriving at a workable deal begins. In those discussions, it seems plain that having someone with experience in the funding industry on your side would be an advantage, or at least preferable to negotiating an unfamiliar contract on your end. Not only is the potential for mistakes minimized, but having someone like Rebecca on the team sends a clear signal to the counterparties that your side is approaching the endeavor with all seriousness.

GK: 3)  Are you anticipating more funding opportunities due to capital inflows into litigation funding because of COVID-19?

RB: Yes. The fact is, we are already seeing an increase of capital available as well as an increase in demand from litigants for funding, and I expect that trend will continue. It makes sense that many investors are seeking opportunities to put capital into assets immune to the volatile market swings that have ensued since the outbreak of COVID-19. Also, it is inevitable that when the global economy falters, there is a rise of disputes, leading to a proliferation of litigation and bankruptcy. I also expect that interest in litigation finance to grow among law firms who have not used funding before, as it is a very beneficial tool to stabilize the legal business and bring cases with the security of payment. Avenue 33 is well positioned to provide expertise to all new entrants in the market, saving them money and time.

GK: Not much to add here, since I am in agreement with Rebecca’s points on the impact of COVID both on investor interest in litigation finance as well as litigant/law firm demand for funds. In fact, the word is already out that there has been an uptick in seeking funding related to patent litigation over the past few months, a trend I am sure is being mirrored in other sectors. At the same time, even with more capital flowing into funder coffers, I don’t anticipate a material lessening of standards among funders when it comes to making investment decisions, especially in such a familiar area (by funder standards) like patent litigation.

My thanks to Rebecca for the insights and cooperation, and I wish her the best of luck with her new — and necessary — consultancy. It is always a privilege to hear from someone who is at the forefront of a key component of the modern IP litigation ecosystem, and I thank Rebecca for agreeing to this interview. I am always open to conducting interviews of this type with other IP thought leaders, so feel free to reach out if you have a compelling perspective to offer.

Please feel free to send comments or questions to me at gkroub@kskiplaw.com or via Twitter: @gkroub. Any topic suggestions or thoughts are most welcome.


Gaston Kroub lives in Brooklyn and is a founding partner of Kroub, Silbersher & Kolmykov PLLC, an intellectual property litigation boutique, and Markman Advisors LLC, a leading consultancy on patent issues for the investment community. Gaston’s practice focuses on intellectual property litigation and related counseling, with a strong focus on patent matters. You can reach him at gkroub@kskiplaw.com or follow him on Twitter: @gkroub.

Hedge Fund Managers Get Out Of Goddamned Miserable Hedge Fund Business

Law School Deans Want October Bar Exam To Be Open Book

We write now to urge that California administer the bar exam on October 5-6 without remote proctoring and without limits on what materials the student may consult during the exam. Indiana and Nevada took this approach in July for their bar exams. …

The bar exam always is a source of stress for those taking it, but the situation this year is dramatically different. We still are in the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic which has affected many of our graduates and their families. Many are dislocated by the fires and adversely affected by the smoke. We are in the midst of a national reckoning with racism and anti-Blackness. Administering the exam without remote proctoring and in an open book manner would decrease the stress for many taking the bar. In addition, there is a non-trivial risk of significant technical issues or snafus in the planned administration that would be substantially alleviated by this alternative approach.

— an excerpt from a letter signed by the deans of California’s 15 ABA-accredited law schools that was sent to the the California Supreme Court, requesting that the October bar exam, with questions provided by the National Conference of Bar Examiners (NCBE), be open book, without remote proctoring. The NCBE has a remote proctoring requirement for states using its testing materials, and has said that it “supports the California Supreme Court and its decisions regarding administration of the October exam … consistent with NCBE’s interest in jurisdictions administering a secure exam.” The California Supreme Court has yet to respond to the deans’ letter.


Staci ZaretskyStaci Zaretsky is a senior editor at Above the Law, where she’s worked since 2011. She’d love to hear from you, so please feel free to email her with any tips, questions, comments, or critiques. You can follow her on Twitter or connect with her on LinkedIn.

Legal Ops Leaders: How Does Your Department Measure Up?  

The annual Law Department Operations Survey, presented by the Blickstein Group, is the original and most respected benchmarking tool in the space, and participants in 2020 will again receive proprietary results data.

The survey was created in 2008 to provide law departments with insights into what was then an emerging field, allowing corporate counsel to compare their legal operations practices with those of their peers. 

Building on areas of focus in prior years, the 2020 survey will address varied topics including: 

  • Challenges related to the coronavirus pandemic
  • Compensation and KPIs
  • The impact of the Big 4
  • Artificial intelligence
  • The legal services delivery model

If you are your organization’s operations head, we’re pleased to invite you to participate in this year’s report. If you are not your organization’s legal ops head, please feel free to forward this email to the appropriate colleague. 

As noted above, participants will receive exclusive access to proprietary results — an unparalleled resource for insight into legal operations trends. (A publicly available report on the survey’s findings will also be published later in the year.)

All individual responses will be kept strictly confidential, and the data will be used only in the aggregate form.