Am Law 100 Firm Rolls Back Salary Cuts, Pledges To Repay Employees In Full

Yet another Biglaw firm has walked back some of its COVID-19 austerity measures. Back in April, Pillsbury — a firm that came in 62nd place in the most recent Am Law 100 rankings, with $677,320,000 in gross revenue in 2019 — announced a series of pay cuts designed to avoid layoffs. First, the reduced partner monthly draws by a minimum of 25 percent. Then in May, the firm reduced associate and counsel compensation by 20 percent and cut all staff compensation by up to 15 percent for those who make more than $100,000 and by 10 percent for those making between $75,000 and $100,000 (with chief officers volunteering to take higher reductions, commensurate with those of partners).

Now, the firm is not only rolling back the cuts, but its repaying all employees who lost money during the height of the coronavirus crisis. From the American Lawyer:

Pillsbury said in a Thursday statement that its financial performance in the first and second quarters was strong. “Consequently, all reductions in compensation incurred in the first half of 2020 are being repaid in full and we are reducing all temporary salary reductions,” the firm said.

The adjusted salary cuts for Pillsbury associates and counsel are now 15%, down from 20%. For staff making more than $100,000, the pay cut is 10%, down from 15%, and for staff making between $75,000 and $100,000, the pay cut is 5%, down from 10%.

We believe that Pillsbury is the first firm to commit to repaying all of its employees in full for the money they lost due to the salary cuts. (Others have offered “bonus” payments as repayment, but not as an across the board policy.)

Congratulations to everyone at Pillsbury. This is great news for a great weekend.

If your firm or organization is slashing salaries, closing its doors, or reducing the ranks of its lawyers or staff, whether through open layoffs, stealth layoffs, or voluntary buyouts, please don’t hesitate to let us know. Our vast network of tipsters is part of what makes Above the Law thrive. You can email us or text us (646-820-8477).

More Firms Are Partially Restoring Pay, but Full Salaries May Wait Until 2021 [American Lawyer]

Earlier: Am Law 100 Firm Cuts Pay For All To Avoid COVID-19 Layoffs


Staci ZaretskyStaci Zaretsky is a senior editor at Above the Law, where she’s worked since 2011. She’d love to hear from you, so please feel free to email her with any tips, questions, comments, or critiques. You can follow her on Twitter or connect with her on LinkedIn.

Law Firm, Know Thyself

Nick Quil (Courtesy photo by Andrew Collings)

HBR Consulting’s roots in analyzing and advising law firms stretch back to the disco era, so when you get a chance to sit under the learning tree with HBR CEO Nicholas Quil, you take it. Over the course of the interview he graciously granted me, Quil shared his thoughts on overcoming the structural problems of law firms, how the industry can transition through the COVID-19 crisis, thriving in the coming decade, and more.

Ways Law Firms Are Structured To Fail

I’ve often argued in this space that the legal industry suffers from a lack of entrepreneurial thinking. When I asked Quil about that concept, he was quick to defend us. “Lawyers do have, I think, pretty entrepreneurial minds, pretty creative minds. It’s just how you lead an organization and create a culture that is aligned to addressing those that I think is challenging.”

In Quil’s view, what law firms really suffer from in comparison with other market sectors is a lack of incentive to reinvest the firm’s profits back into growing the business. He chalks this up to some basic structural impediments inherent in most firms.

First, lawyers and legal staff command a lot of salary. Quil sees firms as engaged in a “war for talent” that generally ensures those salaries keep creeping higher every year. Individual attorneys have little incentive to cut their own salaries for the benefit of the larger entity. Firms that try to make those cuts may see their best talents and biggest clients walk out the door to another firm that will keep that comp high. All that money spent on payroll leaves little for structural improvements.

All of this is exacerbated by the dominant law firm financial model, where the partnership cashes out at year’s end. Since there’s no inherent mechanism for retaining earnings and building up a war chest, many firms struggle to even think about investing long-term in the firm’s growth, much less systematically build out their infrastructure over a series of years.

This all means that law firm leaders hoping to push for reinvestment in the firm itself don’t have many sticks, and so they need to get creative on using carrots. “I think the challenge for a law firm leader is how do you shape a culture, how do you create a vision and a consistency in communication and alignment, that brings people together on the journey of what you’re trying to do in growing your law firm.” It takes conscious effort and buy-in from the partnership to grow an entity, but the firms that can pull it off will be far better off to grow and expand than those that simply ride their current momentum and drain the coffers every year.

Quil On COVID-19

Most of the issues being raised by the COVID-19 crisis are, in Quil’s view, nothing new. “The pandemic has just accelerated some known issues or opportunities that have persisted for a long time.”

That said, the opportunity for change is real. The shared burdens and tragedies of this crisis are creating bonds and culture that otherwise wouldn’t likely exist among law firm members. For example, whereas most law firm leaders would traditionally communicate with their firms from a podium wearing full business formal, the shift to more casual, informal Zoom meetings (with kids and pets occasionally breaking into frame) allows those same leaders to come to their teams from “a much more authentic place.”

Quil also senses that many leaders in the industry are seeing COVID-19 as not just a crisis, but an opportunity. “We’re starting to see a shift toward asking ‘How do we make some strategic transformational bets in this period of time?’ And I think people who acknowledge that you can make tough decisions but implement them compassionately given what’s going on in the world around us, that can be an exponential differentiator versus a mindset of, ‘Let us get through this period, and then we’ll tackle all these things on the other side.’”

As for how to handle those risks, Quil sees financial discipline as key. “Not having a real enough assessment of where we are in this journey” is the biggest mistake Quil sees firms making right now. “Firms right now are in an interesting spot [compared to] the projections that they modeled in spring; they fared better than those. Not as good as the original plan, but I think generally speaking firms are in a better spot than they anticipated.” Quil continued, “A lot can happen in the last three to four months of the year. You can’t overestimate the importance of continuing to have strong financial discipline.” Rather than simply distributing unexpected cash to the partners, Quil suggested that investing in infrastructure or bringing aboard new talent are likely stronger long-term plays to keep firms primed to compete and grow.

Lean Into Who You Are

Quil added that he sees many firms as suffering from a lack of internal identity. “There’s probably not enough true reflection across the industry of what business or what segment of the market we are in as a law firm, and doubling down on what makes [a firm] unique. I think there are firms who are doing that, and I think they are excelling. They’re probably less impacted by competition and price sensitivity to their clients because their clients value them for who they are; they’re not trying to be all things to all people.”

Quil advises firm leaders to spend this time figuring out who they are as a firm and using that knowledge to double down on their key clients. “What can you do to go engage proactively with a certain segment of your client base to say ‘Here’s some observations around what’s happening in the portfolio of work that we’ve done with you historically, here’s some observations on what’s happening from a regulatory standpoint in the industry, and here’s how we think we should be thinking more proactively with you?’”

Most firms struggle to engage in that kind of self-reflection, whether due to a lack of training in such analysis or the more general pressures of the billable hour model to always be moving on to the next chargeable project. “It’s tough to do that in a law firm environment just given the way information flows as well as the metrics that are measured,” Quil said. Spending that non-billable time on self-examination can be worth it, however, for firms that find ways to unlock new value for their clients. In an ever-more-competitive market, clients appreciate the firms that appreciate their budgets and outcomes and are visibly working on improving both.

Tomorrow’s Firms Today

Lastly, I asked Quil to peer into his crystal ball and tell me what the legal industry looks like in 10 years. Quil said that he sees the current flexibility of the COVID-19 quarantine remaining largely in place, even after a vaccine is found. Firms that continue to offer that flexibility and that tailor their cultures around it, will be best situated to continue waging Quil’s war for talent.

Quil also spoke of the market continuing to segment away from all-in-one firms and more toward specific firms for specific needs. “It’s not a great analogy, but think about the automobile industry. They’re all cars, right? But what’s the purpose of the vehicle you need? Is it a heavy-duty pickup truck? Is it a sedan? An SUV? A sports car?” Quil anticipates the legal service market moving in the same direction, with law firms filling niches depending on the sophistication and cost needs of their clients, with ALSPs and the Big Four nipping at our heels all the way.

The moral of the story for today’s law firm leadership is to focus on understanding what niche their firm fills and expanding into that identity. “The opportunity for law firms is in understanding who you are as a law firm, understanding what makes you unique. It’s not what you believe makes you’re unique but what your clients believe makes you unique and really leaning into that. Don’t get distracted with a homogeneous narrative on what the legal industry is doing. Run your own playbook.”

Game on, Mr. Quil.


James Goodnow

James Goodnow is the CEO and managing partner of NLJ 250 firm Fennemore Craig. At age 36, he became the youngest known chief executive of a large law firm in the U.S. He holds his JD from Harvard Law School and dual business management certificates from MIT. He’s currently attending the Cambridge University Judge Business School (U.K.), where he’s working toward a master’s degree in entrepreneurship. James is the co-author of Motivating Millennials, which hit number one on Amazon in the business management new release category. As a practitioner, he and his colleagues created and run a tech-based plaintiffs’ practice and business model. You can connect with James on Twitter (@JamesGoodnow) or by emailing him at James@JamesGoodnow.com.

Am Law 100 Firm Dials Back Its COVID-19 Salary Cuts

(Image via Getty)

It’s summertime, but the livin’ hasn’t been easy for the legal profession thanks to the coronavirus crisis. While some law firms have been left struggling, others seem to have developed antibodies to the virus that’s swept the nation and disrupted profits. We now have news of another law firm that’s decided to partially roll back its COVID-19 salary cuts, something that’s now become a major trend.

Back in April, Fox Rothschild announced that salaries would be slashed across the board, from partners to staff members. Specifically, a tiered salary reduction of between 10 percent and 15 percent for all attorneys and staff making more than $100,000 would take effect in May, while partners would reduce their monthly draws between 10 percent and 20 percent. At the same time, the firm announced that no layoffs would take place (but we have a feeling that the “productivity and performance-related dismissals” that occurred were likely stealth layoffs).

Four months have passed, and employees at the firm are finally getting some good news when it comes to their paychecks.

In an announcement made earlier this week, firmwide managing partner Mark Morris said that on September 1, half of the cuts made to partners’ monthly draws would restored and half of the reductions to attorney and staff salaries would be also be restored (i.e., next month, partner draws will be cut by 5 to 10 percent and attorney and staff salaries will be cut by 5 and 7.5 percent).

“While we will monitor and evaluate the situation to ensure continued financial flexibility in the months ahead, we are encouraged that in only four months, we are able to reverse course on some of these measures,” [Morris] said. “Our goal remains to be in the best position to serve our clients and provide the support they need to navigate these uncertain and challenging times.”

If your firm or organization is slashing salaries, closing its doors, or reducing the ranks of its lawyers or staff, whether through open layoffs, stealth layoffs, or voluntary buyouts, please don’t hesitate to let us know. Our vast network of tipsters is part of what makes Above the Law thrive. You can email us or text us (646-820-8477).

Fox Rothschild Partially Rolls Back COVID-19 Salary Cuts [Law360]

Earlier: Am Law 100 Firm Goes With Good News / Bad News Approach To COVID-19 Austerity Measures


Staci ZaretskyStaci Zaretsky is a senior editor at Above the Law, where she’s worked since 2011. She’d love to hear from you, so please feel free to email her with any tips, questions, comments, or critiques. You can follow her on Twitter or connect with her on LinkedIn.

Am Law 50 Firm Offers Special Wellness Stipends For Employee ‘Grit’ During Pandemic

(Image via Getty)

Biglaw firms across the world have enacted cost-cutting measures as a consequence of the coronavirus crisis, but many of them are willing to dedicate special bonuses to attorneys who have gone above and beyond the call of duty in terms of “extraordinary performance” in the billable hours department. Staff members, on the other hand, were the first to be furloughed during the economic downturn, and instead of the promise of bonuses for exemplary performance are seeing their discretionary bonus pools halved or eliminated entirely.

Biglaw staff members may help firms run efficiently, but they’re often forgotten about when it comes to financial rewards. To be quite frank, it’s depressing, but one firm has remembered these important team members in a very special way.

Orrick recently announced that its staff members, worldwide, would be receiving a tax-free $1,000 wellness stipend for their hard work during the pandemic. Here’s an excerpt from the memo that was sent by chairman Mitch Zuklie:

[T]hrough all of the challenges 2020 has brought, there’s been one thing I, our lawyers, and our clients could count on and that’s YOU. You are the best in the business. This year has asked more of all of you than ever before and you came through with grit, dedication, innovation, teamwork and grace. …

We hope this mid-year wellness stipend takes some stress off for you. On behalf of all of our lawyers, thank you for your contributions to our team.

(Flip to the next page to read Orrick’s memo in full.)

It’s important that Biglaw firms remember to remain focused on employee wellness — especially in difficult times like these. Kudos to Orrick for being kind to its staff members when so many other firms seem to be neglecting them.

What is your firm doing to recognize its staff members during the pandemic? Please email us or text us (646-820-8477) to let us know. Thanks.


Staci ZaretskyStaci Zaretsky is a senior editor at Above the Law, where she’s worked since 2011. She’d love to hear from you, so please feel free to email her with any tips, questions, comments, or critiques. You can follow her on Twitter or connect with her on LinkedIn.

Bar Examiner Offers Less Than Inspiring Answers In Online Exam Defense

The official image of 2020 bar examiners.

New York is barreling toward an online bar exam in October and a lot of people are concerned that there doesn’t seem to be much urgency around proving that this is going to work. In that spirit, the New York State Law Graduate Coalition & United for Diploma Privilege New York participated in a virtual meeting of the NYSBA Committee on Legal Education and Admission to the Bar on August 19 and raised some concerns over the upcoming plans.

NY Board of Law Examiners Executive Director (and NCBE Trustee) John McAlary spent a good deal of the meeting assuaging concerns and according to a letter from the NYSLGC his answers were… a little suspect.

For example, in downplaying concerns that the ExamSoft platform may not be ready to handle the stress of the October exam date and the multiple jurisdictions simultaneously taking tests, McAlary asserted that this wasn’t really new ground because the separate NYLE test is already handled through ExamSoft without incident. Which is true!

But…

The NYLE and the October exam are materially different in several respects, The NYLE is a multiple choice exam administered four times per year to far fewer examinees at once, and without the use of AI or human proctoring, By contrast, this October exam will be administered across at least 19 jurisdictions and to at least 30,000 prospective lawyers simultaneously. BOLE’s experience with ExamSoft’s software in the past (Examplify for the NYLE) is nowhere near as predictive of how their ‘ExamMonitor” software will perform in October as is ExamMonitor’s performance during the Michigan Exam.

This is akin to saying “we’re not worried about the E.T. game because we’ve never had a problem with Donkey Kong.” One ExamSoft product that doesn’t require an internet connection or proctoring is not, in fact, indicative that their bar exam product that does need all that will work the same. Indeed, Michigan suggests it might have significant issues. McAlary prefaced his comments by noting that he was “not a tech guy,” but we’re setting the tech literacy bar awfully low to accept that excuse here.

McAlary also complained about Extegrity CEO, Greg Sarab, publicly dropping out of the online bar exam game, explaining that it was infeasible to produce a platform that did everything state bars wanted in the requisite timeframe. The statement raised a number of eyebrows that remain in full raise mode following the troika of Indiana, Nevada, and Michigan struggles. From McAlary’s standpoint, this cast an unfounded cloud over the online bar exam process and amounted to nothing more than sour grapes from a company that no jurisdiction was planning to use in the first place.

Maybe… but even if no one sought them out for the first time during the pandemic, the fact that Extegrity has pre-existing relationships with nine jurisdictions makes it hard to believe that no one was trying to work with them. At the very least a state would call its existing in-person testing software provider to ask, right? Folks don’t just say, “This company is our trusted partner for exam software in person but now that we’re going online there’s no way we’d talk to these freaks!” Not to speculate, but this sounds a lot like a talking point from an organization grumbling that its founder has now opened up a rival company.

But it’s one thing to be a test administrator and not be a tech guy and another to “not be a test guy.” One of the most consistent complaints we receive about online test procedures is the rule banning scratch paper. To this concern McAlary pointed out that scratch paper is banned now, which misses the point:

While for the last 4 years BOLE has not allowed examinees to bring “scrap paper”, examinees have always been able to write in the margins and annotate questions or text in the MBE, MPT and MEE booklets themselves. This is precisely why every bar prep company has taught examinees that they must draw diagrams, annotate, circle, and highlight key points in order to pass the exam.

As if the bar exam wasn’t abstracted from the real-world practice of law enough, now you have to breakdown long, detailed passages from memory. Get used to doing that pantomime writing thing the spelling bee kids do!

‘Blackacre was conveyed to his grandkids with remainder to…’ (Photo by Mark Wilson/Getty Images)

Look, I get that the logic is that an online proctor won’t be able to tell if any loose sheet of paper may be illicit notes — just as they can’t guarantee you aren’t storing all your notes in the bathroom — but the fixation on preventing cheating runs afoul of basic test-taking. That every prep company trains these applicants to make notes in the booklet proves the problem because it’s established and accepted that many of the questions are crafted in deliberately confusing ways. Which is the point of a hard test! But it’s also why note-taking is expected to be a part of the process.

Just because online exams are better options than in-person exams doesn’t mean they’re above scrutiny. And conversations like these don’t provide a lot of confidence that the process is being approached with the healthy skepticism administrators need to apply.

Check out the whole letter on the next page.

Earlier: So… Are We Going To Have A Test Of This October Bar Exam Software Or Not?
Testing Software Provider Drops Out Of Online Bar Exams Citing Feasibility


HeadshotJoe Patrice is a senior editor at Above the Law and co-host of Thinking Like A Lawyer. Feel free to email any tips, questions, or comments. Follow him on Twitter if you’re interested in law, politics, and a healthy dose of college sports news. Joe also serves as a Managing Director at RPN Executive Search.

Biglaw Firm Reverses Pay Cut For Associates, Partners Not So Lucky

Another Biglaw firm has reversed at least some of their COVID-19 austerity measures. Back in April, Am Law 100 firm Crowell & Moring announced a series of pay cuts designed to avoid layoffs. And almost everyone at the firm was impacted: equity partners took a 25 percent compensation cut, income partners saw their paycheck cut by 20 percent, associates and counsel got a 15 percent cut, and staff making $100,000+, which the firm estimates is about a third of staff members, took cuts in the range of 5 to 20 percent.

But now the firm is walking back the cuts — at least for associates, counsel, and staff. As reported by Bloomberg Law:

“Based upon our performance, which has been better than anticipated, we have decided to resume pre-pandemic compensation levels for our associates, counsel and staff effective September 1,” firm chair Philip Inglima told Bloomberg Law via email.

But yes, the cuts for the partnership — both equity and income partners — are still in effect. As Inglima said, “We will continue to be fiscally conservative in the months ahead to ensure that our firm remains in the strongest position possible.”

If your firm or organization is making salary moves — whether slashing or restoring compensation, closing its doors, or reducing the ranks of its lawyers or staff, whether through open layoffs, stealth layoffs, or voluntary buyouts, please don’t hesitate to let us know. Our vast network of tipsters is part of what makes Above the Law thrive. You can email us or text us (646-820-8477).

If you’d like to sign up for ATL’s Layoff Alerts, please scroll down and enter your email address in the box below this post. If you previously signed up for the layoff alerts, you don’t need to do anything. You’ll receive an email notification within minutes of each layoff, salary cut, or furlough announcement that we publish.


headshotKathryn Rubino is a Senior Editor at Above the Law, and host of The Jabot podcast. AtL tipsters are the best, so please connect with her. Feel free to email her with any tips, questions, or comments and follow her on Twitter (@Kathryn1).

Maybe Don’t Say ‘Maybe I Should Go To Jail’ On A Phone Call That Could Be Recorded When, You Know, Maybe You Should Go To Jail

Morning Docket: 08.21.20

(Image via iStock)

* The Pennsylvania Attorney General is taking action against an Amazon seller for allegedly selling hand sanitizer for $75 a bottle. Maybe it was made with top-shelf alcohol? [Philadelphia Inquirer]

* A group of 100 New York City eateries are planning a lawsuit to allow indoor dining in the Empire State. [New York Post]

* A judge has dismissed a lawsuit aimed at keeping a Chic-fil-A at a San Antonio airport. [San Antonio Express-News]

* A Fort Worth, Texas attorney who walked all the way to Austin, Texas to bring attention to police reform has completed his trek. [Fox News]

* A former FBI lawyer has pleaded guilty to altering a document used to justify surveillance of a former Trump campaign adviser. [AP]

* A disbarred attorney is accused of siphoning around $500,000 meant for a disabled client and using the money on vacations, plastic surgery, and about a thousand Amazon purchases. Hope he was a Prime member at least… [Philadelphia Inquirer]


Jordan Rothman is a partner of The Rothman Law Firm, a full-service New York and New Jersey law firm. He is also the founder of Student Debt Diaries, a website discussing how he paid off his student loans. You can reach Jordan through email at jordan@rothmanlawyer.com.

The Squeeze On Biglaw Office Space — See Also

Sharing Is Caring: Even when partners have to share their offices.

The Pro Bono Flint, Michigan, Settlement: Well done, White & Case!

The 103-Page District Court Opinion: On Trump’s tax returns.

Walking Back Pay Cuts: Reed Smith and K&L Gates.

Kamala Harris’s Modern Family: A love story that’s ready for the spotlight.

The Fight To Lower The Cali Bar Cut Score Retroactively: Hits the legislature.