Lin Wood Canceled By His Peers Over The Whole ‘Execute The Veep’ Thing

(Photo by Apu Gomes/Getty Images)

It’s getting so as you can’t publicly call for the assassination of a sitting vice president without people getting all offended. Cancel culture, amirite?

Alas, despite the sophomoric pleading coming from disgruntled dudes on the internet, there isn’t anything wrong with private actors meting out consequences based on your speech and Lin Wood found that out when the Lawyers Club of Atlanta revoked his membership.

The Lawyers Club, a posh home-away-from-the-office for Georgia attorneys, announced online that they had ruled against letting Wood continue to frequent their halls:

“Mr. Wood’s call for the summary execution of the Vice President is an attack not only on the Vice President performing his Constitutionally required obligation, but also is an attack on the rule of law and the Constitution itself,” the club wrote in its ruling, describing Wood’s execution demand as conduct that would “bring discredit to the Club.”

Well, yeah. You can’t enjoy your Manhattan when the guy at the end of the bar is ranting about how Chief Justice Roberts runs a sex trafficking ring. I think we all prefer our post-work war stories to be free of hearing about the time your case ended up spawning a $1.3B lawsuit.

There are people out there defending Lin Wood’s comments who constantly bring up Kathy Griffin joking about decapitating Trump as though that’s some sort of universal excuse to talk about killing government officials. Except Griffin is recognized as a comic and was making a joke about something Trump specifically said, while Wood has confirmed that he seriously thought Pence should be killed by firing squad. Sure, Griffin isn’t actually funny, but that doesn’t change the context.

The Lawyer’s Club also disapproved of Wood’s social media posts accusing Chief Justice John Roberts of somehow being involved in the death of late Justice Antonin Scalia and belonging to a “cabal” premised on the sexual abuse of children. To support his claims against Roberts, Wood provided the club with a video of an “anonymous” whistleblower who appears to be a QAnon promoter who was previously convicted of committing healthcare fraud to illicitly score massive amounts of opioids.

The important point getting slipped in here is that Wood actually tried to defend himself here. I assumed this was one of those situations where the club sent him a letter and he just moved on with his life. But, no, apparently he tried to push back with the help of healthcare fraudster online wackos. Has he shown this video to Mercer University President Bill Underwood? Is that why Underwood is basically the last remotely credible person on the planet who hasn’t tried to distance themselves from Wood?

The Lawyers Club of Atlanta was founded in 1922 to discuss what to do with unethical fellow practitioners. Given that history, it’s hard to imagine Wood couldn’t have seen this coming while he faces sanctions for his post-election shenanigans.

Meanwhile, Wood is seeking to appeal the club’s decision. Good luck with all that.

Lin Wood Booted From Lawyers Club After Calling for Pence’s Execution [Daily Beast]


HeadshotJoe Patrice is a senior editor at Above the Law and co-host of Thinking Like A Lawyer. Feel free to email any tips, questions, or comments. Follow him on Twitter if you’re interested in law, politics, and a healthy dose of college sports news. Joe also serves as a Managing Director at RPN Executive Search.

FanDuel Sportsbook Sued For Faulty Betting Information

(Photo by Ethan Miller/Getty Images)

Users of online sportsbooks expect that the information they are provided on those platforms is credible so that they can rely upon such information in making decisions on wagers. According to a new lawsuit filed against FanDuel Sportsbook in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, FanDuel gave a user inaccurate information that he then relied upon to his detriment.

Andrew B. Melnick has sued FanDuel Sportsbook for displaying the wrong amount of time remaining on a game, which was a significant factor in him placing a bet that the total amount of points scored in the game would be under a certain threshold. He provided two screenshots to prove the faulty nature of the application. In one screenshot, with a timestamp of 8:52 p.m., the app showed 6 minutes remaining in the game. At 8:53 p.m., Melnick was told that 8 minutes remained.

Melnick’s loss was a whopping $50. However, Melnick says he is concerned that many others are suffering losses on the FanDuel Sportsbook platform based on faulty “real-time” information. For instance, Melnick also points to FanDuel Sportsbook reporting incorrect scores that are materially different from the actual scores in relation to the remaining times displayed.

FanDuel Sportsbook services are currently offered in 10 states and thus Melnick seeks to certify a class of individuals based in those jurisdictions. His complaint includes counts of violating various states’ consumer fraud and protection acts.

It should be expected that FanDuel Sportsbook will file a motion to dismiss the lawsuit on the grounds that it should have been brought in private arbitration in the State of New York pursuant to the platform’s terms of use. Melnick will likely counter that certain public interest factors outweigh the enforcement of the forum selection clause.


Darren Heitner is the founder of Heitner Legal. He is the author of How to Play the Game: What Every Sports Attorney Needs to Know, published by the American Bar Association, and is an adjunct professor at the University of Florida Levin College of Law. You can reach him by email at heitner@gmail.com and follow him on Twitter at @DarrenHeitner.

The Best Law Schools For Getting A Biglaw Job (2021)

(Image via Getty)

Rankings season is upon us, and many publications are rolling out their best offerings for readers’ perusal in advance of the release of the 2022 U.S. News & World Report Law School Rankings.

For more than a decade, Law.com has published a list of the best law schools to go to if you want to work in Biglaw after graduation. Law.com refers to these institutions of higher education as the “go-to law schools,” and this year, they’re ranked by the percentage of 2020 graduates who took associate positions at the 100 largest law firms based on attorney head count.

Before we get to the list of the go-to law schools, it’s worthwhile to speak about the landscape for entry-level employment in the legal profession. Despite the pandemic, the class of 2020 actually did quite well when it came to securing Biglaw jobs — but they may be the last class to have such luck. Law.com has more info:

The J.D. class of 2020 looks to be the last to enjoy what has been a historically strong Big Law hiring market. Data from NALP indicate that the largest law firms had already started to pull back on summer associate hiring even before the pandemic, and those firms are likely to remain conservative in hiring new associates until the pandemic picture becomes clearer, say law firm career services officials. And many law schools are also slowly increasing the size of their classes, which means a smaller percentage of future graduating classes will snag Big Law associate jobs.

That said, things are looking swell for the Go-To Law Schools. Here are the Top 10:

  1. Columbia Law: 65 percent
  2. Northwestern Law: 59 percent
  3. Cornell Law: 56 percent
  4. Penn Law: 55 percent
  5. NYU Law: 53 percent (253 graduates)
  6. Duke Law: 53 percent (113 graduates)
  7. U. Chicago Law: 53 percent (107 graduates)
  8. UVA Law: 52 percent
  9. UC Berkeley Law: 45 percent
  10. Harvard Law: 44 percent

You can access the full list of the Top 50 Go-To Law Schools by clicking here.

With 65 percent of its graduates heading to Biglaw firms after graduation, Columbia has ruled this ranking for the past eight years. The top five schools look a little different from last year’s ranking, with Cornell rising from ninth place to clinch the bronze medal. Northwestern and Penn switched places, while NYU and UVA sank (by two spots and three spots, respectively), with Harvard remaining as the Biglaw jobs caboose. It’s worth mentioning the fact that clerkship placements aren’t considered in this ranking, which is likely the reason why Stanford doesn’t make a Top 10 appearance and why Yale is just chilling outside the Top 15 on this list.

Law.com also has a list of “Firm Favorites,” noting the law schools that specific firms recruited most heavily from. Here are some highlights from that list:

Kirkland & Ellis: Northwestern (24)
Cleary Gottlieb: Harvard (22)
Ropes & Gray: Boston U. (19)
Skadden: Columbia (19)

Perhaps even more notable than these numbers are the tuition figures appended to this year’s rankings. While the total costs aren’t wildly different, the employment percentages are. Why pay ~$62,000 to go to a school that sends 30 percent of its graduates to Biglaw when you can spend ~$25,000 less to go to a school that sends about the same percentage of its graduates to Biglaw?

Either way you slice it, this list is incredibly useful. It’s a great way for law students, both current and prospective, to gauge their employment prospects. Use these rankings wisely — or ignore them, at your peril.

The Top 50 Go-To Law Schools [Law.com]
Columbia Reigns Supreme in Big Law Hiring, But Northwestern, Cornell Came on Strong in 2020 [Law.com]


Staci ZaretskyStaci Zaretsky is a senior editor at Above the Law, where she’s worked since 2011. She’d love to hear from you, so please feel free to email her with any tips, questions, comments, or critiques. You can follow her on Twitter or connect with her on LinkedIn.

One Company’s Championing Of Diversity: An Interview With AbbVie’s Joy Lyu Monahan

(courtesy of AbbVie)

By Cadence Counsel

In our recent conversation about Black History Month, my colleague Monique Burt Williams — CEO of Cadence Counsel, which focuses exclusively on the placement of in-house counsel — identified corporate legal departments that are leaders in advancing diversity. One company she highlighted was AbbVie, the Chicago-based, Fortune 100 biopharmaceutical company behind blockbuster drugs like Humira and Imbruvica. Under the leadership and vision of chief legal officer Laura Schumacher — who has led its legal department since AbbVie became independent from Abbott Laboratories in 2013, and who previously as General Counsel at Abbott — AbbVie has tirelessly promoted diversity, equity, and inclusion, in the legal profession and beyond.

What are some of the innovations that AbbVie has pioneered? And what can in-house legal departments and law firms learn from AbbVie’s example? I recently interviewed Joy Lyu Monahan, Associate Director, Legal Diversity and Outside Counsel Programs, to learn some of the secrets of AbbVie’s success.

Monahan graduated from Georgetown University, from which she earned her bachelor’s degree and then a master’s degree in public policy, and a J.D. from Louisiana State University’s Paul M. Hebert Law Center. After clerking for state and federal judges in Louisiana, she worked in private practice in New Orleans, and then after Hurricane Katrina, she moved to Chicago and worked at Kirkland & Ellis and Edwards Wildman (now part of Locke Lord). She then moved in-house, serving as general counsel of World Business Chicago (WBC) before joining AbbVie in June 2020.

What drew her to the AbbVie opportunity? Monahan and I are both graduates of Jesuit educational institutions (Georgetown for her and Regis High School for me), and we bonded over this at the start of our interview. A key concept in the Jesuit tradition is service, being “men and women for others.” Monahan has spent much of her career in public service — at the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and the U.S. Senate before law school, in her two clerkships right after law school, and during her time at WBC, a public-private nonprofit organization that drives inclusive economic growth — and she viewed the opportunity to promote diversity and inclusion at AbbVie as another opportunity to serve.

“I was looking not just for ‘a job,’ but a chance to do something deeply meaningful,” Monahan told me. “And I found it here at AbbVie. I work for a big company, doing meaningful things, and with both leadership and resources behind my work. We have significant legal spend here at AbbVie — and we can deploy it to advance diversity.”

Monahan knows firsthand the challenges of being a minority woman in a profession still dominated by white men. She was one of just a handful of Asian Americans in her law school class at LSU, as well as one of a small number of women of color at her two law firms. And during the course of her legal career prior to AbbVie, she encountered various forms of bias — often insidious bias — that she does not want future generations to face.

When it comes to diversity in the legal profession, the statistics are stark. As AbbVie CLO Laura Schumacher noted in a November 2020 article for Law360, only 5 percent of active lawyers in the U.S. are Black, 5 percent are Hispanic, and 3 percent are Asian — numbers well short of these groups’ representation in the overall population. Despite representing a majority of the U.S. population, women make up only 38 percent of the U.S. legal profession — and less than 23 percent of U.S.-based law firm partners. So despite the progress of recent years, the legal industry has a long way to go.

AbbVie is doing more than its share when it comes to addressing this problem. Monahan is responsible for facilitating eight workstreams with more than 50 legal colleagues focused exclusively on expanding the company’s already robust diversity initiatives. One of AbbVie’s long-standing programs is its Outside Counsel Diversity Initiative, a carefully designed, metrics-based program to accelerate diversity at the company’s outside counsel. Launched in 2018 with over 25 of AbbVie’s top-spend law firms, the Initiative began by assessing baseline metrics and creating individualized goals for each firm, in terms of the diversity of the lawyers working on AbbVie’s matters. By 2023, AbbVie’s aggregate goals for law firm representation on its matters are equal female and male partners, double the minority partners, and 50 percent underrepresented attorneys.

Given her longstanding commitment to diversity and the strong relationships she forged with managing partners and other law firm leaders during her time as GC of WBC, Monahan was the perfect person to drive the Initiative. And she’s optimistic about its power to bring about change.

“Like other large companies, we have significant legal spending power at AbbVie,” Monahan said. “These are relationships that are meaningful to law firms. And when it comes to diversity, what’s different about our program compared to many others is that we really mean it. We sit down with law firms on a regular basis, we review their numbers, and if their numbers aren’t where they should be, we tell them they need to improve — or they’ll lose our business.”

The program is already showing results. In 2020, compared to baseline hours in 2017, underrepresented lawyer hours are up by 12 percent, female partner hours are up by 18 percent, and minority partner hours are up by a whopping 46 percent.

“We have so many success stories with our outside counsel,” Monahan said. “Sitting in these annual review meetings and seeing these numbers going up, seeing how change happens — that’s one of the best parts of my job.”

Of course, in order for law firms to be able to meet diversity goals like those of AbbVie, they need strong representation of women and minority lawyers, at both the associate and partner levels. This requires addressing the so-called “pipeline problem,” making sure that there’s a steady pipeline of diverse talent going into firms in the first place. This is an issue that AbbVie also appreciates — and addresses.

Monahan spoke proudly about AbbVie’s IP Group Intern Academy, a first-year law school internship program for students with an interest in diversity and intellectual property — an area of law that’s important to AbbVie as a pharma company, and one that historically has trailed other practice areas in diversity. The interns, who are often diverse law students with science backgrounds, work for AbbVie after their 1L summers, gaining valuable experience in IP law — and then AbbVie helps them find jobs with leading law firms for their 2L summers. The program has an excellent track record so far, with 100 percent of diverse interns from the program receiving offers for summer or full-time employment with top firms.

“Many of the interns come from law schools where it’s difficult to land a job with a major law firm,” Monahan explained (and noted that it’s a situation she can relate to, since not many LSU grads go straight to firms like Kirkland). “We pick people who normally wouldn’t have a chance, and we give them a chance. After working for a summer for us, they are ‘AbbVie-endorsed,’ which helps them get hired by top firms as 2Ls. And the firms love our interns — they come back to us and say, ‘She’s amazing, and can we get all of your other interns?’”

“We are now in our third year of the program, and our interns continue to get offers from great firms, all because they got a chance. That’s what the program is about: picking people who wouldn’t normally have a chance, and giving them a chance.”

AbbVie focuses on diversity in its own internal hiring as well. Women make up more than two-thirds of the company’s global legal department, and underrepresented minorities make up almost a third. Under Monahan’s leadership, the company has built strong relationships with a wide range of minority bar associations, whom it turns to when it has job openings to fill. In addition, AbbVie works with outside recruiting firms that prioritize diversity — such as Cadence Counsel, led by Monique Burt Williams, one of the few Black women CEOs in the recruiting industry.

Not surprisingly, AbbVie and its legal team have won numerous awards for their commitment to diversity and inclusion. In 2020, the Coalition on Women’s Initiatives in Law gave AbbVie its Benchmark Award, which goes to a law firm or corporate legal department that has demonstrated passion and commitment to leading the advancement of women’s issues. In 2019, Chambers and Partners recognized Laura Schumacher for her outstanding contributions to furthering diversity in the legal profession. AbbVie has also been recognized as a top employer or workplace for diversity by such authorities as Fortune, Forbes, Working Mother, DiversityInc., and the Human Rights Campaign.

The honors and awards are nice — but to Joy Lyu Monahan, what’s most meaningful about her work is the ability to bring about meaningful change. And if recognition and positive publicity can help AbbVie’s approach spread throughout the legal industry, that’s all to the good.

“We want to be a leader and to set an example,” she said. “This is why we want to get the word out. We want to propagate our model. We want other companies to say, ‘We want to do what AbbVie is doing.’”

“When filling my role, AbbVie chose me — but I also chose AbbVie, for its longstanding, outstanding commitment to diversity. I work with an amazing team of leaders and colleagues who share these values, and could not have made this progress without them. I’m so excited to be at a place where I can make real change in the legal profession.”


DBL square headshotEd. note: This is the latest installment in a series of posts from Lateral Link’s team of expert contributors. This post is by David Lat, a managing director in the New York office, where he focuses on placing top associates, partners and partner groups into preeminent law firms around the country.

Prior to joining Lateral Link, David founded and served as managing editor of Above the Law. Prior to launching Above the Law, he worked as a federal prosecutor, a litigation associate at Wachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz in New York, and a law clerk to Judge Diarmuid F. O’Scannlain of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. David is a graduate of Harvard College and Yale Law School. You can connect with David on Twitter (@DavidLat), LinkedIn, and Facebook, and you can reach him by email at dlat@laterallink.com.


Cadence Counsel is a boutique search firm that focuses exclusively on the placement of in-house counsel. We specialize in Retained Executive Search, Ad Hoc Counsel Placement, and Diversity & Development Consulting. A certified Women’s Business Enterprise, Cadence Counsel is a leading diversity supplier of in-house legal professionals within the Fortune 500.

NYU Law School Ethics Professor Embroiled In Major Ethics Scandal

(Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)

As her bio reads, Linda Lacewell is “an adjunct professor at New York University School of Law, teaching ethics in government.” According to the New York Times, Lacewell, who serves as the Superintendent of the New York State Department of Financial Services when she’s not teaching, has got a head start on drafting her next issue-spotter. It might read something like this:

A public health official wrote a report that made Governor Adam Como look bad. But Governor Como wants to earn outside income writing a book about how good he looks. Can senior official, Lisa Lovelace, change the report to hide nursing home deaths? And if she doesn’t remove it herself, is there a problem with her knowing someone else changed the report?

Maybe if Lacewell is lucky she can squeeze in this exam before the real-life scandal that birthed it comes to a close. You hate to write an exam that just goes to waste!

While Andrew Cuomo is also facing an investigation by the NY AG’s office over multiple allegations of sexual harassment, the nursing home scandal remains more nuanced but nonetheless damning for fans of good governance.

In a nutshell, early in the pandemic, Cuomo signed an order forcing nursing homes to take in elderly COVID patients in order to keep the hospitals from overcrowding. It was an idea that had public health backing at the time, as experts felt that medically equipped nursing facilities could care for these patients as well as a hospital without taking one of the very limited hospital beds (a shortage that Andrew Cuomo was responsible for in the first place). Unfortunately, this might have contributed to outbreaks in nursing homes accelerating the death toll. Or those deaths may have been inevitable when the virus was spreading out of control and seniors were most hard hit. Even if the advice Cuomo received turned out to be wrong, he wouldn’t be to blame for following the best guidance available at the time. But what happened next is absolutely on his administration and should be the end of it… you know, except for the fact that the sexual harassment will probably be the end of it.

Public health officials drafted a report that included data on nursing home deaths. Cuomo’s administration overrode the health officials and edited that data out of the report to remove any question of whether or not Cuomo’s policy had a disastrous impact on nursing homes. Normally, one would put “allegedly” in there as a courtesy except Cuomo straight-up admitted that they lied in the report.

Mr. Cuomo finally released the complete data, saying he had withheld it out of concern that the Trump administration might pursue a politically motivated inquiry into the state’s handling of the outbreak in nursing homes.

Oh? That’s a thing we can do now? One has to give the guy some credit for thinking he could pull off the “look, we kept two sets of books because we were worried the IRS might prosecute us” defense. If the cover up is always worse than the crime, that goes double when there wasn’t necessarily a crime to begin with. It’s just breaching the public trust in government reporting… for funsies.

In any event, guess who acted as Cuomo’s first-responders in this matter according to the Times reporting?

The aides who were involved in changing the report included Melissa DeRosa, the governor’s top aide; Linda Lacewell, the head of the state’s Department of Financial Services; and Jim Malatras, a former top adviser to Mr. Cuomo brought back to work on the pandemic. None had public health expertise.

The Times article describes the public health report negotiations as “well beyond the usual process of the governor’s office suggesting edits to an agency report, and became ‘intense’ at times.” Ultimately, sources for the Times said that Malatras “substantially rewrote” the report, something an advisor with no health experience shouldn’t be doing with a public health report in the middle of a pandemic.

So one might lay all the blame on Malatras, except the article closes with this somewhat awkward pair of paragraphs:

Even so, an edited version prepared by Mr. Malatras did not remove the higher death toll.

That occurred later, after Ms. DeRosa and Ms. Lacewell became aware of its inclusion. It was taken out soon after.

You don’t want to say res ipsa loquitur, but….

In any event, this claims she knew what the death toll numbers were, knew they were in the report originally, and then knew that they somehow got removed from the report. Even if she wasn’t involved in that decision, it makes for a really interesting question about an official’s responsibilities when it comes to “ethics in government.”

But Cuomo’s book was a bestseller, and that’s been the only ethical consideration in Albany for years now.

Cuomo Aides Rewrote Nursing Home Report to Hide Higher Death Toll [New York Times]


HeadshotJoe Patrice is a senior editor at Above the Law and co-host of Thinking Like A Lawyer. Feel free to email any tips, questions, or comments. Follow him on Twitter if you’re interested in law, politics, and a healthy dose of college sports news. Joe also serves as a Managing Director at RPN Executive Search.

How To Find Your Place In Biglaw

David Moreno is a Biglaw partner, but that doesn’t mean he took the typical route to get there. From his early days as a lawyer in the Manhattan District Attorney’s office, to being a sports agent, to his time in a boutique law firm, to Biglaw partnership at Brown Rudnick, David’s seen the legal industry from a lot of different angles and he’s eager to share his experiences.

In the latest episode of The Jabot, I chat with David about diversity in Biglaw what are some of the challenges for recruiting and retention of diverse attorneys. We discuss his recent lateral move to Brown Rudnick, and what are some of the things he looked for in making that jump, and advice for others looking to move firms. We also talk about David’s passion for pro bono work and why is that so important for the legal industry.

The Jabot podcast is an offshoot of the Above the Law brand focused on the challenges women, people of color, LGBTQIA, and other diverse populations face in the legal industry. Our name comes from none other than the Notorious Ruth Bader Ginsburg and the jabot (decorative collar) she wore when delivering dissents from the bench. It’s a reminder that even when we aren’t winning, we’re still a powerful force to be reckoned with.

Happy listening!


headshotKathryn Rubino is a Senior Editor at Above the Law, and host of The Jabot podcast. AtL tipsters are the best, so please connect with her. Feel free to email her with any tips, questions, or comments and follow her on Twitter (@Kathryn1).

Lawyer Says ‘Sneaky Bitch’ Before Judge Reminds Him He’s Not Muted

Zoom can be a tricky medium for argument. There are connectivity issues, and garbled conversations, and the pressure to not appear naked. And you might just show up as a cat. Still, most people are learning to manage the system. Most people have at least found the mute buttons.

Well, except for the attorney who snapped “sneaky bitch” at Judge Emily Miskel. But don’t worry, this tweet takes you on a journey…

Oh. That kind of bitch.

Another reminder that lawyers are trained to be very precise with their choice of words.


HeadshotJoe Patrice is a senior editor at Above the Law and co-host of Thinking Like A Lawyer. Feel free to email any tips, questions, or comments. Follow him on Twitter if you’re interested in law, politics, and a healthy dose of college sports news. Joe also serves as a Managing Director at RPN Executive Search.

Turns Out Hertz’s Future Not As Bright As Day Traders Hoped

Before there was GameStop, there was Hertz: a pandemic-battered legacy brand seemingly destined for the scrapheap that became inexplicably beloved by the day-trading hordes. Of course, no two situations are perfectly analogous, and there were some key differences here, namely that unlike GameStop, there was no particularly good reason to believe that Hertz was anything but doomed. It had no inspiring investor with a turnaround plan, was about to be delisted from the New York Stock Exchange and, oh yea, was bankrupt. But the people running Hertz did have the gumption to do what GameStop’s leaders did not, which was to throw their hands into the air and say, “You wanna buy this stock? Here, have as much of it as you’d like.”

Morning Docket: 03.05.21

* Several states have passed laws that give robots the same rights as pedestrians on sidewalks. This is a slippery slope to Skynet… [Axios]

* A lawyer defending the leader of the NXIVM cult in a criminal case is withdrawing from the representation. [Times Union]

* An Andrew Cuomo accuser says talk of Cuomo being considered for Attorney General prompted her to come forward. [Boston Globe]

* A former Bachelorette contestant has filed a defamation lawsuit against outlets who he alleged falsely reported that he was at the January 6th Capitol riots. [KHOU.com]

* A lawyer is in hot water for using the imagery of a pit bull in advertising. Maybe they’ll throw him a bone… [Daily Business Review]


Jordan Rothman is a partner of The Rothman Law Firm, a full-service New York and New Jersey law firm. He is also the founder of Student Debt Diaries, a website discussing how he paid off his student loans. You can reach Jordan through email at jordan@rothmanlawyer.com.

Ken Paxton Seems To Have Forgotten He’s Facing Felony Charges — See Also