How Have Millennials Changed Law Firm Culture? 

As the oldest millennials turn 40 this year — and more of them become law firm partners — we’re once again taking our annual look at this generation of lawyers. 

In partnership with our friends at Major Lindsey & Africa, we want to particularly delve into the dynamics of how millennials continue to affect legal industry culture. 

Starting today, we are running a series of quick surveys intended to capture the viewpoint of younger lawyers and help determine what differentiates them from both their (non-attorney) generational peers and their older colleagues.

Today’s survey concerns the workplace priorities of millennials, covering topics as varied as diversity and inclusion, mentorship, and work-life balance.

Please take a couple of minutes and tell us what you think. (Please note we are not exclusively interested in hearing from millennials; lawyers of all ages are encouraged to take the survey.)

Overcoming Legal Fears And Leveraging Your Victories

I had a friend who was so petrified of heights that he wasn’t even comfortable in a three-story building. Then his business sent him and some of his colleagues on a teambuilding-type trip somewhere off the beaten track. What he didn’t know was that part of this trip would involve jumping into a natural pool from a ledge — a ledge 20 feet above the water.

I wish I could have seen his face when he learned about that. I imagine it was quite different from the ecstatic look on his face when he came back. He was beaming when he returned, so chuffed that he managed to do the jump (and not just once). After he overcame his initial fear, he relished in the adrenaline rush, excited to jump several more times.

There is quite a lesson to be learned from my friend’s experience. We usually feel pretty tense about our fears, but the tension is potential energy. If we overcome the fear, that energy has the power to enact positive change.

Having been in the legal industry for quite some time, I have picked up on three major fears that lawyers seem to have — fears that I believe hold them back.

Not Competition

Lawyers tend to be pretty competitive people by nature; they can often be found comparing billables, how little sleep they get, or just even the Biglaw firms in which they work. In law, there are just so many comparable areas that it seems only natural that lawyers would be competitive. This is fair enough, as I am not against a bit of healthy competition. I do think, however, there is a balance to be had.

In fact, Breen Sullivan asserted that the power of collaboration is greater than that of competition. With the pandemic keeping everyone at home, people have been particularly pushed toward digital platforms, which are more democratic and provide better opportunities for collaborations with others. With everyone dealing with an uncomfortable, unusual situation, competitors were more willing to work on things together. People and businesses joined forces to tackle a bigger market, or they supported up-and-coming ventures, recognizing their value and potential. Listen to the full extent of Breen’s thoughts here:

Artificial Intelligence

This idea is becoming more and more of a reality as we make leaps and bounds within the computer industry. These advances can be quite hard to follow, but, thankfully, Annmarie Giblin helped to break it down for me. In short, she said that AI will take over the boring parts of being a lawyer but cannot replace lawyers on the whole. In fact, it will even create new fields within the law that deal with technological liability, as well as expanding extant areas like compliance and cybersecurity. Annmarie explores the opportunities and threats of AI in this video:

Stepping Outside of Law

You will often hear me talking about things like law fusion or the interactions between law and other fields. Well, as it turns out, I am not the only one focused on these concepts. Nada Alnafaji is an advocate for integration, as well. In particular, she thinks tech and project management complement the law field quite well. Tech advancements open up the opportunity for digital contracts, which are not only sustainable but also a lot more flexible and practical; this is especially true when we consider remote working. As for project management, well, she has had some experience herself, which she said was invaluable in teaching her the lingo and inner workings of the business world. This enabled her to better facilitate contract negotiations (through practices such as data storytelling), as well as to be aware of the need for and potential of a bigger legal budget allotted to new technologies and their respective learning curves. She had a lot more to say about it here:


Olga V. Mack is the CEO of Parley Pro, a next-generation contract management company that has pioneered online negotiation technology. Olga embraces legal innovation and had dedicated her career to improving and shaping the future of law. She is convinced that the legal profession will emerge even stronger, more resilient, and more inclusive than before by embracing technology. Olga is also an award-winning general counsel, operations professional, startup advisor, public speaker, adjunct professor, and entrepreneur. She founded the Women Serve on Boards movement that advocates for women to participate on corporate boards of Fortune 500 companies. She authored Get on Board: Earning Your Ticket to a Corporate Board Seat and Fundamentals of Smart Contract Security. You can follow Olga on Twitter @olgavmack.

Hometown Hero Ruth Bader Ginsburg Gets Her Own Celebratory Day In Brooklyn

(Photo by Michael M. Santiago/Getty Images)

Judicial icon Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, a beacon of hope for women’s rights in America, passed away in September 2020, but her legacy will last forever. The liberal lioness has been memorialized in bronze, and a statue of her atop the Supreme Court’s steps will be permanently placed in her hometown of Brooklyn, New York.

The statue was unveiled this past Friday, three days before what would have been Ginsburg’s 88th birthday on March 15, a day that Brooklyn Borough President Eric Adams has announced will now be known as Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg Day.

Gille and Marc, the artists who created the statue, secured RBG’s approval before her death, said in a statement:

We had the honor and privilege to create Justice Ginsburg’s distinguished likeness in everlasting bronze as a part of Statues for Equality. The final statue, reflects her wish to be depicted in a dignified manner. With the two steps on its large base representing the Supreme Court and the climb she made to get there, the work is designed to provide the public with an opportunity to stand at her side, and gain inspiration from her journey fighting for equal rights.

To visit Justice Ginsburg’s statue, you can make a free reservation online. Visits will last for 20 minutes and up to six guests may attend. The month of March has already been reserved, and these will go quickly. Click here to make your reservation today.

Ruth Bader Ginsburg statue unveiled in Brooklyn to mark her birthday, Women’s History Month [ABC News]


Staci ZaretskyStaci Zaretsky is a senior editor at Above the Law, where she’s worked since 2011. She’d love to hear from you, so please feel free to email her with any tips, questions, comments, or critiques. You can follow her on Twitter or connect with her on LinkedIn.

The Need For An Open Conversation About Race

In the early 1990s, the Cleveland Browns were losing most of their football games. Everyone wanted to fire the miserable head coach — a loser named Bill Belichick. As I drove home from work, I’d occasionally tune into the local sports talk station, where the host, Bill Needle, would discuss with callers the Indians’ starting rotation, the Cavaliers’ line-up (a decade before LeBron), and the Browns’ woes.

My son, Jeremy — you remember him — was in kindergarten at the time. The school scheduled a meeting of the teacher and all of the kids’ parents. I worked at the largest law firm in Cleveland (and the second- or third-largest firm in the world at the time), and I drove straight from the office, wearing my business suit, to the parent-teacher conference.

One of the other parents at the meeting introduced himself as Bill Needle. At the end of the meeting, I asked that person if it was a coincidence of names or if he was the guy I sometimes listened to on the radio at night. He looked me up and down, not missing the relatively formal attire, and said, “You don’t look like a four hours of ‘Belichick sucks’ kind of guy to me.’”

Bill and I became pretty good friends, and he later told me that he often talked about race on the air. He said that many people were afraid of the topic or couldn’t handle it sensitively. But sports teams were diverse, there were issues about race in the leagues, and he was glad to be one of the relatively few people who could talk about the subject without enraging listeners.

I flashed back to that moment last week, when I was on a Zoom call with a bunch of old law school buddies. (This pandemic has been good for at least one thing: I’ve reconnected by Zoom with folks who I spoke to only sporadically over the past few decades.) Three of the old buddies are now law school professors, and the gang on the call talks openly about all subjects, as you would expect old friends to do — politics, religion, race, sexual orientation, whatever. No subject is off limits. As one of us said recently, “When we get together on these calls, the rule is this: ‘Offense is often given, but never taken.’”

When the subject of race came up recently, most of the folks on the call, and all three academics, said that they would be very reluctant to speak publicly about matters of race. The general agreement was that there are evolving rules on this topic that folks can’t anticipate or don’t yet understand. Unless you’re a specialist in the vocabulary, and you know where all the land mines are hidden, there’s no reason to take the chance of talking about race in public.

I personally am pretty darned foolish, but I’m not foolish enough to ignore the advice of all my old buddies. I’m not saying a thing here about race.

But I am noting that there are significant issues about race affecting our world, and we’re probably less likely to resolve those issues successfully if people are afraid even to discuss them.


Mark Herrmann spent 17 years as a partner at a leading international law firm and is now deputy general counsel at a large international company. He is the author of The Curmudgeon’s Guide to Practicing Law and Drug and Device Product Liability Litigation Strategy (affiliate links). You can reach him by email at inhouse@abovethelaw.com.

Second Trial Avoided Rather Less Auspicious For Private Equity Firm Than The First

It’s never ideal to be arrested and sued for allegedly running a nearly $2 billion Ponzi scheme while having a court-appointed monitor installed to keep future alleged Ponzi scheming to a minimum, but the folks in charge of car dealership private equity shop GPB Capital Holdings had some reason for optimism. For one, there is, we are told, “significant evidence” in their favor which, if it exists, would presumably throw into question whether they had actually defrauded more than 17,000 investors across the country to keep up on the Ferrari payments and to keep the private-jet flight attendant on the payroll. What’s more, the last time one of their number faced trial, it never happened, on account of the pretty sweet deal he cut with the Justice Department.

Morning Docket: 03.15.21

(Photo by Simon Dawson – WPA Pool/Getty Images)

* Buckingham Palace is reportedly hiring a law firm to investigate Megan Markle’s bullying claims. Wonder what it would be like if the firm from Suits did this job… [Business Insider]

* Google will face a lawsuit claiming that it still tracks users in Incognito Mode. [Verge]

* The criminal trial of Elizabeth Holmes, the founder of Theranos, may be delayed due to her recently announced pregnancy. [Guardian]

* The Manhattan District Attorney recently announced he will be retiring at the end of his term. [Washington Post]

* A Florida lawyer has been charged with first-degree murder. [ABC News]

* The Clemson University Track and Field Team has hired counsel over the elimination of their program. Hope they don’t have too many “hurdles” to pursuing a claim… [ESPN]


Jordan Rothman is a partner of The Rothman Law Firm, a full-service New York and New Jersey law firm. He is also the founder of Student Debt Diaries, a website discussing how he paid off his student loans. You can reach Jordan through email at jordan@rothmanlawyer.com.

And The Biggest Pain In The Ass of 2020 Is…

It’s a rough time to be holding an awards ceremony, what with all of the death and misery and inability to safely dine at a Chipotle or Steak ‘n Shake. But, unfortunate as it was, 2020 did happen, albeit a little less so than previous years: Shareholder activism was down by 10% in that awful 12 months, and by one measure successful activism declined by 16%.

Why I Became A Lawyer

I was the eldest son of the managing partner of a midsize accounting firm founded by my grandfather in 1907. During the 1930s, it was one of the largest accounting firms and was supposed to merge with an accounting firm of equal size that is now part of the Big Four. To make matters worse, I was born on March 15, so it was assumed by everyone in the family that I was destined to take over the accounting firm.

For my 10th birthday, I was provided with a copy of the Internal Revenue Code and instructed to memorize it. My grandfather emphasized to me that accountants serve a vital function as they are the doctors for business. You can always hire people the do the mechanical and mathematical functions, but a real accountant understands and analyzes the numbers to advise the client. In addition to the general auditing, the firm was recognized for its tax work involving sophisticated business and personal transactions. The more this was discussed, the more I realized that the primary service providers for business transactions were almost always the attorneys, not the accountants.

While I was in high school, a family friend thought that I would be interested in law school and gave me some briefs to read concerning a case he was arguing to the Second Circuit Court of Appeals. After reading the decision below, which was not favorable to his client, his brief, the opposition brief and reply brief, he asked for my thoughts on what he should emphasize at the argument.

I found it fascinating to read the story behind the case, how the district court viewed the plaintiff’s case and how each of the lawyers approached the appeal. I did not know how lucky I was that I was reading papers prepared by exceptional lawyers. They provided a meaningful service to their clients, and I could see that a decision by the Second Circuit could impact many other businesses and people in the future. I also understood that there was an alternative to becoming an accountant.

As the oldest grandchild, one of my responsibilities was to spend time with my grandfather on weekends. He was probably the most brilliant person I have ever known, and he was a very successful accountant, even though he became blind in his early 20s. He was a dairy farmer, but because his retina was detached and there was no cure at that time, he and his wife decided to enroll at the City College of New York to become accountants. He used an abacus, but more importantly, he had the gift of listening to numbers for various items on the balance sheet, the income statement and the cash flow statement and then advising clients on what they needed to do to improve their businesses. For his first four years he — along with my grandmother, who also became an accountant — worked for one of the very large accounting firms. He then decided to open his own firm near Wall Street and was very successful. I loved hearing the stories of how he helped businesses become more profitable and successful.

Rather than going to the Wharton School of Business, where my father was an active alumnus, I chose Cornell University because I wanted a liberal arts education. I had no idea what I really wanted to do for a living. During the summers, I sold Fuller Brushes door to door. One of my territories was in the slums of White Plains. I saw the plight of many of the tenants who were living in rat-infested housing. I started to research ways in which I could help them, including going to the building department to look at property records. Luckily, one of the employees at the building department was a friend of our family, and he directed me to where and what to look for and how I could help these people.

In my junior year, all I knew was that I did not want to become an accountant and stopped by the law school to find out if going to law school would defer my military obligation to serve as an officer in the U.S. Army. While I was asking questions and trying to obtain information about law school, the associate dean asked if I would like an interview. We discussed what I was looking for in life and why I did not want to go into the family accounting firm. At the end of the interview, I asked where I could obtain the application to apply to Cornell Law School. His response was that I had just had my interview and if my grades were as represented, Cornell had a special program that the first year of law school would also be my senior year. A few days later, Dean Penney called and stated that my grades were actually two percentage points higher than what I told him. He asked me why I understated my grade average. My answer was that I was not sure of my exact average. If I told him a number, and he found out that I had understated the number, that was much better than overstating my grades. His response was that was a sign of being a careful, thoughtful, and successful lawyer; I could begin Cornell Law next September.

Being a lawyer is a service profession. You have to generally like people and want to help them make their businesses or lives more successful. In the Army, although I could have been a full-time lawyer in the Judge Advocate Generals Corps, that would require a four-year commitment. As an infantry officer, I only had a two-year commitment. I chose the latter. And after I reported to duty, I learned that if a soldier is accused of an offense, that soldier had the right to choose anyone to defend him.

My personnel file said that I graduated from an Ivy League and law school. People in my unit started asking me to defend them, but I had the option of deciding which cases I wanted to handle. I only took those cases which I thought were interesting, and I learned to be a trial lawyer on the job with no guidance. But I was happy providing this type of service in some unique cases, such as representing someone accused of mass murder and a sergeant who was caught in a homosexual act two months before he would be eligible for a full pension. Although I intended to be a tax lawyer for a Wall Street firm, the idea of defending someone, especially successfully, was very satisfying.

After law school, I became an associate in a midsize New York law firm, working primarily in the tax law department. At 29, my father became quite ill, and I was asked to take over the tax department and manage the firm until he recuperated. The firm had the entire 42nd floor of 20 Exchange Pl., except for a corner office that was sublet to a securities lawyer.

I was very frustrated because at the end of the day, I could not quantify any meaningful accomplishments. Saving a business hundreds of thousands of tax dollars or a wealthy woman $50,000 in taxes left me unsatisfied. Listening to the lawyer who was bringing companies public and the sense of accomplishment he realized in creating new businesses sounded much more appealing. After talking it over with my wife, we moved to Washington D.C., where I was employed as an attorney/analyst with the Division of Corporation Finance of the SEC and acting tax counsel to the division. I never looked back. After all these years, I still enjoy providing legal services to help businesses and individuals. Every night, I feel that I have accomplished something to help someone else.


Charles Hecht is an entrepreneurial lawyer who had his own firm for 39 years and recently joined Balestriere Fariello as a partner. He specializes in innovative solutions to complex litigation, arbitration, and securities transactions. He values teamwork, which is one of the reasons why he joined a New York City boutique law firm. He and his colleagues represent domestic and international clients in litigation, arbitration, investigations by governmental agencies, and securities transactions. You can reach him via email at charles.hecht@balestrierefariello.com.