Latest Future Ready Lawyer Survey from Wolters Kluwer Finds Broad Adoption of Gen AI By Legal Professionals

Seventy-six
percent
of
legal
professionals
in
corporate
legal
departments
and
68%
in
law
firms
are
using
generative
AI
at
least
once
a
week,
with
a
third
of
those
professionals
using
it
daily.

That
is
among
the
findings
of
the
2024
Future
Ready
Lawyer
Survey
from
Wolters
Kluwer,
the
sixth
edition
of
a
report
that
offers
an
annual
view
of
the
legal
industry’s
evolving
landscape,
with
a
particular
emphasis
on
technology,
especially
generative
AI,
and
how
these
advancements
are
reshaping
law
firms
and
corporate
legal
departments.

Based
on
responses
from
712
legal
professionals
in
10
countries,
the
report
outlines
significant
trends,
challenges,
and
opportunities
the
industry
is
facing
over
the
next
three
years.
These
include
technology
integration,
evolving
client
expectations,
talent
management,
environmental,
social,
and
governance
(ESG)
considerations,
and
information
security.


Gen
AI
Adoption

Not
surprisingly,
the
report
finds
that
the
integration
of
gen
AI
is
one
of
the
most
significant
trends
in
the
legal
industry,
offering
the
potential
to
streamline
processes,
improve
efficiency,
and
reduce
manual
tasks.

Increasingly,
the
legal
industry
is
adopting
gen
AI
to
handle
routine
legal
processes,
such
as
legal
research,
document
review,
and
drafting.
This
shift
allows
legal
professionals
to
focus
on
more
complex,
value-added
tasks,
the
report
says.

According
to
the
report,
76%
of
legal
professionals
in
corporate
legal
departments
use
gen
AI
at
least
once
a
week,
compared
to
68%
of
those
in
law
firms.
A
third
of
respondents
use
it
daily. 
In
addition,
65%
of
legal
professionals
expect
AI
technology
investment
to
increase
over
the
next
three
years.

But
despite
all
the
enthusiasm
around
gen
AI,
many
challenges
remain,
the
report
says.
Among
the
challenges
most
frequently
cited
by
respondents
were
issues
related
to
integration,
trust
in
AI-generated
outcomes,
and
concerns
over
ethics
and
data
privacy.

Integrating
gen
AI
into
existing
legal
systems
and
workflows
remains
difficult,
the
survey
says,
with
37%
of
respondents
in
law
firms
and
42%
in
corporate
legal
departments
citing
this
as
a
significant
challenge.

Two
other
major
issues
are
concerns
over
the
accuracy
of
gen
AI
outputs
and
the
ethical
implications
of
using
AI
in
legal
work.
Around
41%
of
law
firm
professionals
and
37%
of
corporate
legal
professionals
expressed
doubts
about
the
reliability
of
gen
AI
results.

Despite
these
challenges,
the
report
underscores
that
gen
AI
is
no
longer
an
optional
tool
but
a
necessary
component
for
future-ready
legal
organizations.
To
fully
leverage
the
benefits
of
gen
AI,
legal
professionals
will
need
ongoing
training,
ethical
guidelines,
and
robust
review
processes
to
mitigate
issues
like
AI
“hallucinations.”


AI’s
Impact
on
the
Billable
Hour

Gen
AI’s
ability
to
drive
efficiency
is
expected
to
have
a
profound
impact
on
traditional
legal
business
models,
particularly
the
reliance
on
billable
hours,
the
report
concludes.

The
reliance
on
billable
hours,
once
a
staple
of
the
legal
profession,
is
expected
to
decline
as
law
firms
adopt
new
pricing
models,
such
as
flat
fees
and
value-based
billing.

It
finds
that,
overall,
60%
of
legal
professionals
expect
AI
to
reduce
the
dominance
of
the
billable
hour
model,
with
67%
of
corporate
legal
departments
and
55%
of
law
firms
believing
that
AI-driven
efficiencies
will
significantly
impact
the
prevalence
of
the
billable
hour.

More
than
half
of
the
respondents
feel
prepared
to
adapt
their
business
practices,
workflows,
and
pricing
models
to
accommodate
these
changes.


Attracting
and
Retaining
Talent

On
another
topic,
the
report
finds
at
attracting
and
retaining
top
legal
talent
remains
a
challenge
in
an
industry
undergoing
transformation.

In
particular,
legal
professionals
emphasized
the
value
of
work-life
balance,
competitive
compensation,
and
opportunities
for
continuous
learning.

The
report
says
that
81%
of
respondents
emphasized
the
importance
of
work-life
balance,
and
82%
believed
their
organization
performed
well
in
this
area.

And,
in
an
age
when
AI
is
becoming
more
integrated
into
legal
work,
72%
of
respondents
stated
that
technological
proficiency
is
increasingly
essential
when
hiring
new
talent.


ESG
Issues

There
continues
to
be
growing
demand
for
expertise
in
environmental,
social,
and
governance
(ESG)
issues,
and
that
demand
is
putting
pressure
on
both
corporate
legal
departments
and
law
firms,
the
survey
finds.

That
said,
corporate
legal
departments
feel
better
prepared
to
address
ESG
demands
than
law
firms,
with
41%
of
corporate
respondents
feeling
“very
prepared”
compared
to
only
29%
of
law
firm
respondents.

However,
both
sectors
face
challenges,
particularly
in
terms
of
training
staff
and
aligning
with
regulatory
changes.

While
the
need
for
ESG
training
is
clear,
the
report
says,
less
than
half
of
law
firms
currently
offer
such
programs.
Among
corporate
legal
departments,
56%
offer
ESG
training.

The
report
cautions
that,
as
ESG-related
demands
grow,
firms
that
fail
to
adapt
may
struggle
to
meet
client
expectations.


The
Challenge
of
Information
Security

Another
challenge
faced
by
respondents
in
the
survey
is
information
security.
With
the
rise
of
cyberattacks
and
data
breaches,
74%
of
legal
professionals
see
escalating
information
security
challenges
as
a
major
trend,
with
33%
expecting
a
significant
impact
on
their
organization.

However,
only
29%
of
respondents
feel
“very
prepared”
to
meet
these
security
challenges,
despite
80%
believing
that
their
organization
is
generally
prepared.
This
gap
between
general
readiness
and
complete
preparedness
underscores
the
need
for
ongoing
improvements
in
information
security
practices.

“The
question
of
whether
legal
professionals
are
future-ready
remains
relevant
and
compelling,
even
after
six
years
of
Future
Ready
Lawyer
research,”
the
report
concludes.

Clearly
that
is
so,
as
the
survey
paints
a
picture
of
an
industry
in
the
midst
of
profound
transformation,
due
most
strikingly
to
the
rapid
proliferation
of
gen
AI,
a
development,
the
report
says,
that
has
put
lawyers
to
the
test.

“Judging
from
the
2024
Future
Ready
Lawyer
Survey
results,
they
seem
to
have
jumped
on
the
gen
AI
train
more
rapidly
than
they’ve
ever
jumped
on
new
technology
before.
It
is
a
promising
development,
which
says
a
lot
about
the
agility
and
adaptability
of
legal
professionals.”

Biglaw Firms May Not Be Ready To Offer The Mental Health Accommodations Young Lawyers Want – Above the Law



Ed.
note
:
Welcome
to
our
daily
feature,

Quote
of
the
Day
.


People
wanting
basic
changes
to
the
job
description
and
other
accommodations
to
help
them
live
a
more
balanced
life
for
their
mental
health—that’s
a
really
different
phenomenon
from
what
firms
were
seeing
five
years
ago,
and
it’s
only
going
to
increase.


It’s
not
out
of
malice
or
ill
will,
they
simply
are
not
seeing
how
it’s
possible.
The
job
is
the
job.
With
the
model
of
large
law
firms
right
now,
time
demands
and
time
pressures
are
often
very
significant,
and
the
expectations
of
constant
availability
are
very
real.




Patrick
Krill,
a
law
firm
mental
health
adviser,
in
comments
given
to
the

Legal
Intelligencer
,
on
whether
Biglaw
firms
are
fully
equipped
to
deal
with
the
mental
health
accommodations
being
requested
by
their
youngest
attorneys.
“I
just
don’t
think
most
firms
are
fully
aware
of
the
challenge
that
is
staring
them
in
the
face,”
Krill
concluded.



Staci ZaretskyStaci
Zaretsky
 is
a
senior
editor
at
Above
the
Law,
where
she’s
worked
since
2011.
She’d
love
to
hear
from
you,
so
please
feel
free
to

email

her
with
any
tips,
questions,
comments,
or
critiques.
You
can
follow
her
on

X/Twitter

and

Threads

or
connect
with
her
on

LinkedIn
.

California Bar Gets Their Supreme Court’s Go Ahead – Above the Law

Hitting
the
group
running
works
until
you
trip
up.
After
some
soul
searching
and
number
crunching,
the
State
Bar
of
California
realized
that
their
needs
would
be
better
met
if
they
ditched
the
NBCE
for
a
cost-effective
approach
to
licensing.
They
partnered
up
with
Kaplan
and
set
an
expected
test
date,
but

got
sent
back
to
the
drawing
board
by
California’s
Supreme
Court
.
The
Bar
took
the
steps
they
needed
to
fix
the
problems
and
it
looks
like
things
are
paying
off.

Reuters

has
coverage:

The
California
Supreme
Court
on
Tuesday
approved
a
controversial
plan
by
the
state
bar
to
switch
to
a
new
lawyer
licensing
exam
that
will
be
delivered
both
remotely
and
in-person
at
test
centers
starting
in
February.

The
high
court
also
approved
the
State
Bar
of
California’s
proposal
to
give
a
score
boost
for
those
who
take
the
new
bar
exam
if
they
agree
to
sit
for
a
beta
test
next
month
and
perform
well.

First
off,
shouts
out
to
accessibility!
Lots
of
people
are
fully
committed
to
the
bit
where
we
pretend
COVID
isn’t
still
a
threat
so
the
economy
goes
brr,
but
it
is
nice
to
know
that
the
COVID
conscious
don’t
have
to
be
distracted
by
stranger
sniffles
while
they
sit
for
an
experimental
licensing
test.
The
remote
option
also
bodes
well
for
people
who
intend
to
practice
in
California
but
happen
to
be
out
of
state
for
test
day.
If
you
can
sit
for
the
beta
test,
go
for
it,

but
the
score
boost
isn’t
worth
getting
FOMO
over
if
you
can’t
make
it
.

Good
luck
on
the
bar!


California’s
New
Bar
Exam
Gets
Court
Approval
To
Move
Ahead

[Reuters]


Earlier:


California
Needs
To
Focus
On
Procedurals
Before
Administering
Bar
Replacement


California
Bar
Takes
Steps
To
Continue
With
Its
Bar
Replacement


Bar
Exam
Offers
Extra
Credit
With
A
Catch



Chris
Williams
became
a
social
media
manager
and
assistant
editor
for
Above
the
Law
in
June
2021.
Prior
to
joining
the
staff,
he
moonlighted
as
a
minor
Memelord™
in
the
Facebook
group Law
School
Memes
for
Edgy
T14s
.
 He
endured
Missouri
long
enough
to
graduate
from
Washington
University
in
St.
Louis
School
of
Law.
He
is
a
former
boatbuilder
who
cannot
swim, a
published
author
on
critical
race
theory,
philosophy,
and
humor
,
and
has
a
love
for
cycling
that
occasionally
annoys
his
peers.
You
can
reach
him
by
email
at [email protected] and
by
tweet
at @WritesForRent.

Disgraced Former Trump Attorney Has Some Interesting Advice For The Ex-President – Above the Law

Jenna
Ellis

Last
we
heard
from

former
MAGA
attorney/election
denier

Jenna
Ellis,
she
was
making
a

tear-soaked
guilty
plea

in
the
Georgia
election
interference
RICO
case

becoming
the
third
attorney
to
flip
on
the
former
president,
Donald
Trump
(behind

Sidney
Powell

and

Ken
Chesebro
).
But
her
desperate
bid
for
attention
continues,
this
time
with
an

interview
with
Politico

as
she
opines
on
the
state
of
the
2024
election.

At
least
her
answers
about
*this*
presidential
election
don’t
immediately
lean
towards
election
denial.
Look
at
that
personal
growth!

Ellis
notes
the
risk
of
Christian
voters
sitting
out
this
election,
and
throws
out
this
piece
of
advice
for
the
former
president’s
campaign.

In
2016
[Trump]
won
in
part
because
judicial
appointments
was
a
key
issue,
so
(in
addition
to
the
border
and
the
economy)
he
should
draw
attention
to
how
extreme
a
Harris
administration’s
federal
nominees
would
be.

Trump
has
already
re-made
the
Supreme
Court
in
his
image….
and
the
approval
rating
of
the
Court
has
been

sinking

accordingly.
We’re
at
a

shockingly
low

38%
approval
for
the
Court

down
a
whopping
20%
from
the
high
water
mark
of
58%
in
March
of
2017.
And
45%
say
the
current
Court
is
too
conservative.
Maybe
focusing
on
making
the
judiciary
even
more
conservative
isn’t
a
winning
strategy.




Kathryn Rubino HeadshotKathryn
Rubino
is
a
Senior
Editor
at
Above
the
Law,
host
of

The
Jabot
podcast
,
and
co-host
of

Thinking
Like
A
Lawyer
.
AtL
tipsters
are
the
best,
so
please
connect
with
her.
Feel
free
to
email

her

with
any
tips,
questions,
or
comments
and
follow
her
on
Twitter

@Kathryn1
 or
Mastodon

@[email protected].

NetDocuments Moves To Bring Generative AI To Content… Not The Other Way Around – Above the Law

Image
courtesy
of
NetDocuments.

As
we
close
in
on
the
second
anniversary
of
ChatGPT’s
release,
the
generative
AI
conversation

at
least
when
it
comes
to
the
legal
industry

is
starting
to
shift.
After
a
year
or
so
of
fretting
about
generative
AI
hallucinating
like
it
dropped
bad
acid
and
trying
to
figure
out
newer
and
better
legal
offerings,
autumn
has
ushered
a
new
narrative
as
the
AI
discourse
matures
and
providers
focus
on
taking
generative
AI
and
improving
the
whole
experience
of
using
the
tool.

This
emphasis
on
practical
integration
and
respecting
everyday
legal
workflows
dominating
this
week’s
NetDocuments
Inspire
Conference.
“It’s
not
about
bringing
content
to
your
AI,
but
about
bringing
AI
to
your
content,”
CEO
Josh
Baxter
explained
as
the
show
kicked
off.
The
era
of
lawyers
taking
material
and
feeding
it
into
external
AI-driven
applications
has
to
end.

“What
does
it
look
like
if
you
have
to
take
your
content
to
AI.
It
looks
like
you’re
starting
to
stand
up
a
bunch
of
point
solutions
to
solve
each
individual
problem.
And
its
not
a
scalable
approach.
It
created
governance
issues
and
security
risks
for
your
organization,
it
creates
an
environment
where
you’re
dealing
with
multiple
vendors
your
costs
start
to
pile
up,
the
workflow
and
the
experience
for
your
end
users
is
frustrating
and
inefficient.”

An
analogy
that
kept
coming
up
is
the
increasingly
disjointed
experience
with
streaming
services
with
users
hunting
and
pecking
between
apps
searching
for
a
single
show.
But
TVs
that
have
indexed
everything
and
can
jump
to
the
right
service
for
the
show
when
asked
make
the
user’s
experience
better.

The
company’s
guiding
mantra
to
build
an
“intelligent
document
management
system”
envisions
a
bunch
of
features,
but
the
most
straightforward
is
the
most
significant.
Taking
a
firm’s
corpus
of
documents
and
employing
semantic
search
to
deliver
the
material
a
lawyer
needs,
not
necessarily
the
material
that
they
can
pick
the
right
keywords
to
capture.
With
an
auto-profiling
capability,
Chief
Product
Officer
Dan
Hauck
explained,
NetDocs
will
be
able
to
vectorize
documents
in
real
time
to
empower
these
common
sense
searches.
So
when
a
lawyer
takes
a
new,
say,
deposition
transcript
dropped
into
the
system
and
enriches
the
document
so
it
doesn’t
get
missed
because
someone
forgot
to
tag
it
appropriately
at
the
time
or
crafted
the
wrong
query
down
the
road.

Screenshot 2024-10-24 at 11.46.42 AM

Earlier
this
year,
in
the
eDiscovery
context,
I
mused
that

generative
AI’s
most
powerful
application
might
be
as
a
user
experience
tool
.
Lawyers
being
able
to
type
out
natural,
common
sense
queries
and
the
system
fill
in
all
those
nuanced
gaps
that
seniors
depend
(successfully
or
not)
upon
juniors
to
figure
out.
Applying
this
to
the
document
management
context
opens
the
door
for
a
more
simple
and
meaningful
interrogation
of
a
firm’s
stored
knowledge.

NetDocuments
also
introduced
the
ndMAX
Legal
AI
Assistant,
promising
to
provide
answers
and
insights
directly
within
the
document
management
system.
This
tool,
currently
in
beta,
will
be
available
by
the
end
of
the
year.
Issues
List
Generator
automatically
compiles
key
issues
from
contracts
or
case
files,
allowing
for
a
more
focused
review.
The
transactional
side
isn’t
left
out
of
the
fun,
with
the
Contract
Playbook
Generator
creating
customized
negotiation
playbooks
complete
with
clause
suggestions
and
fallback
positions,
while
the
Due
Diligence
app
automates
document
review
in
mergers
and
acquisitions,
flagging
risks
for
thorough
analysis.

This
is
all
on
top
of
the
apps
that
users
are
crafting
themselves
inside
the
system.
For
those,
NetDocuments
announced
a
new
import/export
feature
allowing
apps
built
inside
one
repository
to
be
moved
to
another
easily
without
requiring
a
new
build.

All
of
which
is
to
reiterate
that
the
narrative
around
legal
industry
AI
has
moved
toward
improving
the
user
experience,
embedding
AI
in
ways
that
deliver
meaningful,
practical
results.
An
enabler
of
efficiency
and
accuracy,
without
requiring
a
steep
learning
curve
or
technological
juggling

perhaps
without
even
requiring
the
user
to
realize
that
they’re
using
AI
to
get
these
answers.




HeadshotJoe
Patrice
 is
a
senior
editor
at
Above
the
Law
and
co-host
of

Thinking
Like
A
Lawyer
.
Feel
free
to email
any
tips,
questions,
or
comments.
Follow
him
on Twitter or

Bluesky

if
you’re
interested
in
law,
politics,
and
a
healthy
dose
of
college
sports
news.
Joe
also
serves
as
a

Managing
Director
at
RPN
Executive
Search
.

Keyboard Cat Becomes Courtroom Star During Zoom Trial – Above the Law

‘You
need
to
take
care
of
this
cat
situation,
right
meow.’

We
may
be
on
the
other
side
of
the
pandemic,
but
much
like
a
cat
racing
across
the
keyboard
when
you’re
trying
to
type,
Zoom
court
mishaps
are
still
running
rampant.

In
the
wake
of
the
hilarious

cat
lawyer
filter

that
made
lawyers
rush
to
check
their
settings,
yet
another
potential
legal

cat
astrophe
recently
went
viral
on
Instagram,
courtesy
of

Attorney
Memes
.

We’re
glad
everything
turned
out

purrrrr
fectly
fine
and
that
Stan
the
“legal
assistant”
cat
had
a
stan
in
court
during
trial.
Has
anyone
else’s
cat
made
an
official
appearance
on
the
record?


Earlier
:

Lawyer
Tells
Judge
‘I’m
Not
A
Cat’
In
The
Best
Zoom
Court
Mishap
Yet



Staci ZaretskyStaci
Zaretsky
 is
a
senior
editor
at
Above
the
Law,
where
she’s
worked
since
2011.
She’d
love
to
hear
from
you,
so
please
feel
free
to

email

her
with
any
tips,
questions,
comments,
or
critiques.
You
can
follow
her
on

X/Twitter

and

Threads

or
connect
with
her
on

LinkedIn
.

GOP Harasses Nuns In Hunt For THE FRAUDS – Above the Law

In
2021,
a
federal
judge
in
Michigan

sanctioned

Sidney
Powell
and
her
merry
band
of
dipshit
lawyers
for
docketing
bogus
evidence
that
they
had
not
bothered
to
verify
in
their
desperate
effort
to
overturn
the
results
of
the
presidential
election.

“It
is
one
thing
to
take
on
the
charge
of
vindicating
rights
associated
with
an
allegedly
fraudulent
election,”
Judge
Linda
Parker

seethed
.
“It
is
another
to
take
on
the
charge
of
deceiving
a
federal
court
and
the
American
people
into
believing
that
rights
were
infringed,
without
regard
to
whether
any
laws
or
rights
were
in
fact
violated.
This
is
what
happened
here.”

Powell
and
her
team
got
dinged
for
spamming
the
docket
with
gobbledygook
“evidence”
of
fraud,
such
as
an
affidavit
about
an
unusually
cheerful
couple
handing
packages
to
the
UPS
guy
and
accounts
of
voters
casting
in-person
ballots
after
voting
by
mail

something
which
was
entirely
legal.

Republicans
are
now
gearing
up
to
do exactly
the
same
thing
,
with
vigilantes
aiming
to
DO
UR
OWN
RESEARCH
their
way
into
proving
that
there
are
millions
of
illegal
votes
being
cast.
Here’s
Elon
Musk’s
pro-Trump
PAC
setting
up
an
online
repository
for
GOTCHAS.

And
one
of
the
first
entrants
in
this
game
is
a
guy
named
Cliff
Maloney,
who
left
a
group
called
Young
Americans
for
Liberty
under

dubious
circumstances

three
years
ago.
Maloney
is
now
running
something
called

“The
Pennsylvania
Chase,”

door-knocking
to
turnout
Republicans.
And
last
week
he
posted
what
he
figured
was
big
news:
a
convent
with
53
registered
voters!

When
it
was
pointed
out
to
him
that
convents
tend
to
have
multiple
individuals
residing
at
the
same
address,
he
insisted
that

no,
it
was
the
children
who
are
confused
.

“Now
the
commies
are
coming
in
claiming
that
‘nuns
live
there’
or
‘you
idiot
just
google
it’
WRONG,”
he

huffed
.
“Our
team
leader
spoke
to
the
one
person
there
and
they
claimed
‘NO
ONE
LIVES
HERE.’”

The
Benedictine
Sisters
of
Erie,
who
do
indeed
have
a

robust
online
presence
,

responded

that
they
“take
no
issue
with
knocking
on
doors
to
increase
citizen
participation
in
elections”
but,
they
do
object
to
“claiming
false
information
as
true
in
an
effort
to
discredit
differing
views
or
affiliations.”

“We
want
to
call
Cliff
Maloney
to
account
for
his
blatantly
false
post
that
accuses
our
sisters
of
fraud.
We
do
live
at
Mount
Saint
Benedict
Monastery
and
a
simple
web
search
would
alert
him
to
our
active
presence
in
a
number
of
ministries
in
Erie,”
Sister
Stephanie
Schmidt,
prioress,
said
in
a
statement
published
online.
“We
also
want
to
alert
those
who
subscribe
to
X
and
other
social
media
platforms
to
be
vigilant
and
seek
additional
information
before
accepting
these
posts
as
truth.”

And
then,
when
reporters
from
the
Washington
Post
knocked
on
the
door,
the
prioress

invited
them

in
to
take
pictures
of
the
sisters

who
really
do
live
there!

at
chapel.

The
nuns
insist
that
no
such
interaction
with
a
door
knocker
ever
took
place,
but
Maloney
is
still
unwilling
to
back
down.

“If
the
53
people
registered
at
this
address
are
legal
voters…
then
I
encourage
them
to
participate
in
their
right
to
vote,”
he

sulked

last
night.
“Right
now,
we’ve
got
our
team
continuing
to
analyze
the
situation.”

All
of
which
is
hilarious,
or
would
be
if
millions
of
people
hadn’t
seen
Maloney’s
original
post
and
believed
it.
These
nitwits
are
already
trying
to
convince
their
supporters
that
there
are
millions
of
“illegal”
voters,
if
only
they
can
ferret
them
out.
And
no
matter
what
these
women
do
to
“prove”
that
they
actually
exist,
it
will
never
be
enough
for
Maloney
and
his
ilk
to
concede
that
they
got
it
wrong.

Odds
that
the
nuns
from
Erie
wind
up
in
an
affidavit
filed
by
some
Kraken-addled
idiot
in
Pennsylvania
court:

100
percent
.


A
GOP
operative
accused
a
monastery
of
voter
fraud.
Nuns
fought
back.

[WaPo]





Liz
Dye
 lives
in
Baltimore
where
she
produces
the
Law
and
Chaos substack and podcast.

The Viral Embarrassing State Supreme Court Mistake – Above the Law

Terminally
online
lawyers
were
plagued
by
one
question
over
the
last
24
hours

who
is
Louis’
Nana
and
why
does
she
have
her
own
Supreme
Court?

If
that
sentence
makes
zero
sense
to
you,
well,
you
were
probably
too
busy
billing
to
see
the
viral
post
at
the
root
of
the
question.
An
image,

purportedly

from
the
recent
swearing
in
of
new
lawyers
in
the
great
state
of
Louisiana,
is
making
the
rounds
over
a
pretty
glaring
typo.

Now,
this
looks
to
be
a
projection
onto
a
curtain,
not
a
printed
(and
presumably
copyedited)
seal,
so
it
seems
feasible
that
the
mistake
really
happened
and
the
image
isn’t
the
result
of
internet
tomfoolery.
(Above
the
Law
reached
out
to
the
Louisiana
Supreme
Court,
and
they
did
not
immediately
provide
a
comment.)

And
here’s
the
thing

it
isn’t
the
only
time
spelling
the
name
of
the
state
was
an
issue.
Another

Reddit
user
produced

a
coaster
misspelling
the
state’s
name.

via
Reddit
user
buttercream-gang

And
“Louisiana”
also
proved
tough
at
the
2022
Essence
Festival.

US-POLITICS-CULTURE-HARRIS

(Photo
by
JADE
THIRASWAS/AFP
via
Getty
Images)

Maybe
Louisiana
needs
to
take
a
tip
from
its
neighboring
state,
Mississippi,
and
come
up
with
a
jaunty
little
tune
to
help
folks
learn
to
properly
spell
its
name.




Kathryn Rubino HeadshotKathryn
Rubino
is
a
Senior
Editor
at
Above
the
Law,
host
of

The
Jabot
podcast
,
and
co-host
of

Thinking
Like
A
Lawyer
.
AtL
tipsters
are
the
best,
so
please
connect
with
her.
Feel
free
to
email

her

with
any
tips,
questions,
or
comments
and
follow
her
on
Twitter

@Kathryn1
 or
Mastodon

@[email protected].

Unveiling Hidden Deal Insights: GenAI For Powerful Negotiation And Exceptional Client Service – Above the Law



When
it
comes
to
finding
precedent
deal
data
and
what’s
market,
transactional
lawyers
are
frustrated.


It
often
takes
in
excess
of
6-8
hours
to
find
a
precedent
deal
and
identify
relevant
deal
points
from
firm
documents.
And,
even
then,
lawyers
may
not
feel
they
are
getting
a
complete
picture
of
the
data.


Now
multiply
these
hours
exponentially
when



all


recent
precedent
deal
points
are
needed
as
a
reference
for
drafting
and
negotiation.
 


For
many
lawyers,
the
process
is
further
frustrated
by
the
number
of
steps

and
people

required
for
manual
deal
data
extraction.


When
a
new
deal
comes
in,
or
a
client
is
in
immediate
need
of
critical
information,
lawyers
start
the
hunt.
Often,
details
can’t
be
found
quickly,
and
others
are
engaged.
An
urgent
email
goes
out
looking
for
help.


From
accounting
to
knowledge
management
to
business
development,
professionals
across
the
firm
drop
everything
to
help
with
the
search.
Other
priorities
are
put
on
hold
as
the
team
scrambles
to
assemble
the
information,
often
from
various
sources,
all
while
the
client
waits.
The
team
puts
together
the
best
information
they
can
find
and
hopes
it
will
be
enough.    


Regardless
of
the
outcome,
this
is
not
an
ideal
process.  


Enter
Litera’s
new
solution
for
transactional
lawyers
and
knowledge
management
teams:


Foundation
Dragon
.


This
easy-to-use
platform
helps
lawyers
instantly
answer
complex
questions
by
using
GenAI
to
extract
deal
points
from
firm
deal
documents
and
pairing
it
with
matter
experience
data
to
quickly
and
accurately
get
you
the
answers
you
need,
when
you
need
them.


That
6-8
hours
it
can
take
an
associate
to
pull
deal
points
from
just
one
deal?
It’s
now
cut
down
to
minutes.


Furthermore,



all


of
your
firm’s
deals
are
in
one
searchable
place,
so
finding
the
most
relevant
precedent
deals
and
their
deal
points
for
comparison
is
simple
for
any
attorney
to
find

no
staff
needed. 


The
tool
verifies
data
with
minimal
human
input,
ensuring
the
highest
standard
of
accuracy
while
still
being
simple
and
intuitive. 


Getting
Started


Lawyers
typically
lack
the
time
to
learn
a
complex
new
system,
and
ease
of
onboarding
is
a
key
goal
for
any
legal
technology
tool. 


Foundation
Dragon
is
intuitive
and
easy
to
use. 


When
a
deal
closes,
simply
upload
the
closing
documents
to
Dragon,
select
the
appropriate
deal
type
and
Dragon
will
extract
and
load
the
deal
data
from
the
documents
into
the
system
quickly
and
easily.


To
help
get
a
new
system
off
the
ground,
Litera
also
offers
a
service
to
pre-populate
Foundation
Dragon
with
all
of
a
firm’s
historical
data.

Litera_01


Contrast
this
process
with
that
of
many
law
firms,
which
collect
experience
data
by
circulating
a
blank
survey
form
to
a
transaction
team.


The
latter
approach
requires
lawyers’
time
and
effort
to
fill
a
blank
page

and
often
achieves
mixed
results
in
collecting
usable
data. 


With
Foundation
Dragon,
the
system
will
automatically
extract
nearly
300
deal
points
for
an
M&A
transaction
within
minutes
of
a
document
upload,
and
the
commercial
real
estate
acquisition
version
of
Foundation
Dragon
extracting
over
90
deal
points.
Foundation
Dragon
now
supports
several
new
document
types,
including
commercial
real
estate
leases,
credit
agreements,
limited
partnership
agreements,
and
NDAs,
with
plans
to
introduce
more
in
the
coming
year.


The
system
then
delivers
a
populated
dashboard
of
all
the
deal
points
that
have
been
extracted. 


Instead
of
a
blank
survey,
a
transaction
team
receives
a
pre-existing
draft.
They
only
need
to
verify
the
accuracy
of
the
deal
point,
and
the
process
for
doing
so
is
intuitive.

Litera_02


A
click
on
a
deal
point
value
automatically
brings
up
the
relevant
portion
of
the
underlying
document.
With
one
click
of
the
button,
the
deal
point
can
then
be
marked
“verified”
in
the
system
or,
on
rare
occasions,
edited
to
the
correct
figure.


This
creates
a
workflow
where,
after
the
closing
of
a
deal,
an
attorney
who
worked
on
the
matter
can
verify
all
of
the
deal
points
in
a
matter
of
minutes. 


The
extracted
deal
points
will
then
be
accessible
to
all
lawyers,
be
included
in
aggregate
metrics,
and
be
available
for
marketing
and
business
development
efforts. 
Foundation
Dragon’s
insights
become
even
more
impactful
when
combined
with
Litera’s
experience
management
solution,
Foundation,
as
it
allows
you
to
push
the
extracted
deal
data
over
to
Foundation’s
matter
profiles.
This
means
firms
can
reap
the
benefits
of
automatically
populating
enhanced
deal
profiles
in
Foundation
with
minimal
effort.


Accessing
Your
Insights


Once
your
deals
have
been
uploaded
into
the
system,
your
users
can
put
the
data
to
work
through
an
efficient,
user-friendly
interface
that
displays
all
of
the
metrics
that
have
been
collected. 


One
view,
called
“market,”
contains
all
of
the
deal
points
as
aggregate
metrics,
based
on
every
deal
the
firm
has
uploaded. 


The
resulting
dashboard
allows
you
to
instantly
answer
the
question
of
“what’s
market?”
for
any
of
the
deal
points
the
system
collects. 

Litera_03


Looking
for
insights
based
on
a
specific
matter
or
group
of
matters?
A
few
clicks
narrow
the
data
points
down
to
that
subset. 


Each
deal
point
here
represents
the
type
of
data
that
would
often
have
to
be
found
by
having
a
knowledgeable
professional
comb
a
200-page
document
for
hours
on
end. 

Litera_04


A
group
of
up
to
five
deals
can
be
compared,
and
the
data
can
be
directly
exported
to
Excel. 


The
simplicity
of
the
design
is
particularly
helpful
when
comparing
deals.


Here,
all
of
the
deal
points
being
compared
are
laid
out
right
next
to
each
other
for
easy
visualization. 

Litera_05


From
document
upload
to
data
visualization,
Foundation
Dragon
provides
a
simple,
intuitive
process
that
requires
minimal
onboarding
while
delivering
impactful
insights
that
save
lawyers
time
and
a
client
billable
hours. 


Putting
Data
to
Work


For
the
legal
industry,
manually
curating
data
from
transactions
has
long
been
a
time-consuming
task
requiring
skilled
practitioners
and
delivering
mixed
results.


Some
firms
have
devoted
decades
to
creating
a
bespoke,
reasonably
efficient
process.
These
firms
have
distinct
advantages
in
accessing
data-driven
insights
from
precedential
deals
when
negotiating
transactions
and
advising
their
clients.


Firms
that
lack
such
a
system
often
rely
on
“reply
all”
emails
and
firmwide
fire
drills
instead

a
process
that
needlessly
consumes
resources
and
delivers
inferior
results. 


As
Foundation
Dragon
shows,
this
is
a
situation
that
can
be
effectively
addressed
by
generative
AI. 


Foundation
Dragon
offers
elite
data
tracking
and
reporting
to
all
transactional
lawyers

with
only
minimal
effort
on
the
lawyers’
part
to
get
it
up
and
running.
Dragon
gives
lawyers
the
ability
to
negotiate
from
a
position
of
strength
and
deliver
unparalleled
client
outcomes. 

ATL’s 15th Annual Legally Themed Halloween Costume Contest – Above the Law

Halloween
is
nearly
upon
us,
and
members
of
the
legal
community

especially
law
students

will
likely
be
out
celebrating
all
Halloweekend
long.
As
usual,
we
want
to
see
your
creativity
in
action.

For
the
fifteenth
year
in
a
row,
we
here
at
Above
the
Law
are
soliciting
legally
themed
costumes
for
our
annual
Halloween
contest.
We’re
continually
impressed
with
how
creative
lawyers
and
law
students
can
be
when
they
take
their
noses
out
of
their
books.

Here
are
some
of
the
winning
looks
from
the
past
few
years
of
the
contest:
the Donald
J.
Trump
College
of
Law
 (2016), Brett
Kavanaugh’s
calendar
and
his
beer
 (2018), Ruth
Baby
Ginsburg
 (2020),
and Warhol’s
Soup
Law
 (2023).


image001

Please email
us
 or
text
us
(646-820-8477)
your
pictures
and
then
we’ll
vote
on
the
winner
of
our
annual
competition.
We’re
all
looking
forward
to
judging
you!



Staci ZaretskyStaci
Zaretsky
 is
a
senior
editor
at
Above
the
Law,
where
she’s
worked
since
2011.
She’d
love
to
hear
from
you,
so
please
feel
free
to

email

her
with
any
tips,
questions,
comments,
or
critiques.
You
can
follow
her
on

X/Twitter

and

Threads

or
connect
with
her
on

LinkedIn
.