The law firm of choice for internationally focused companies

+263 242 744 677

admin@tsazim.com

4 Gunhill Avenue,

Harare, Zimbabwe

Category: News Feeds

Category Added in a WPeMatico Campaign

Munakopa murder: Lawyers challenge authenticity of post-mortem

They
argue
that
the
date
on
the
document
does
not
align
with
the
victim’s
date
of
death.

Bigson
Nyoni
and
Langton
Makonye,
members
of
the
Zimbabwe
Republic
Police,
along
with
Ross
Johnston
and
Kyle
Bennet
from
the
neighbourhood
watch
committee,
face
charges
for
the
murder
of
the
then
34-year-old
Paul
Munakopa.

Nyoni
and
Makonye
are
represented
by
Kholwani
Ngwenya
of
T
J
Mabhikwa
and
Partners,
while
Johnston
and
Bennet
are
represented
by
Prince
Butshe-Dube
of
Mathonsi
Ncube
Law
Chambers.

The
defence
argues
that
the
post-mortem
indicates
it
was
conducted
on
May
21,
2020,
whereas
the
victim’s
date
of
death
is
recorded
as
May
24,
2020.
They
claim
this
discrepancy
casts
doubt
on
the
accuracy
of
other
details
in
the
document.

The
State
countered
that
the
defence
could
have
raised
these
concerns
earlier,
as
they
had
the
documents
in
their
possession
for
some
time.

It
also
noted
that
it
would
request
a
medical
expert
to
testify
in
court,
interpret
the
post-mortem
findings,
and
determine
whether
the
report
should
be
accepted
as
evidence.

High
Court
Judge
Justice
Naison
Chivayo
postponed
the
trial
to
November
11
for
continuation.

Munakopa
allegedly
succumbed
to
gunshot
wounds
sustained
during
a
high-speed
chase
and
shootout
that
occurred
during
the
Covid-19
lockdown.

In
their
defence,
the
police
officers
claimed
they
were
on
duty
on
the
night
of
the
incident
and
had
been
briefed
about
a
black
Honda
Fit
vehicle
suspected
to
have
been
involved
in
criminal
activities
in
the
area.

They
stated
that
Munakopa,
who
was
with
his
girlfriend,
violated
lockdown
regulations,
and
when
they
attempted
to
stop
him
for
questioning,
he
fled.
This
led
to
the
shooting
in
an
attempt
to
stop
the
car.

Woman Steals US$24 000 From Employer Moments After Armed Robbery


24.10.2024


20:03

A
35-year-old
woman
from
Barham
Green,
Bulawayo,
on
Tuesday,
appeared
before
regional
magistrate
Benhilda
Chiundura
on
charges
of
stealing
US$24,000
from
the
steel
manufacturing
company
where
she
works
in
the
Belmont
industrial
area
during
an
armed
robbery.


The Chronicle reported
that
the
accused
person,
Nothando
Banana,
allegedly
committed
the
crime
on
October
15,
the
same
day
that
robbers,
armed
with
pistols
and
a
garden
pick,
stole
US$32,500
in
a
violent
incident.
She
is
being
charged
with
theft
of
trust
funds.

Banana
is
being
represented
by
Bob
Siansole
of
Shenje
and
Company.


She
reportedly
attempted
to
cover
up
her
crime
by
blaming
the
robbers
for
the
missing
money.
She
was
released
on
US$100
bail
and
will
return
to
court
on
November
1.

Prosecutor
Jethro
Mada
told
the
court
that
Banana
took
advantage
of
the
robbery
to
steal
US$24,400
from
a
safe
she
was
responsible
for,
where
cash
from
salespersons
was
deposited
before
being
handed
over
to
her
superiors.

He
said
the
suspects
confronted
the
security
guards
and
workers
on
night
duty
and
ordered
them
to
lie
down
before
tying
their
hands
and
legs
with
shoelaces.
Said
Mada:

The
gang
proceeded
to
an
office
upstairs
where
they
used
a
grinder
to
cut
open
two
safes.
They
only
stole
from
one
safe
and
left
the
one
Banana
was
entrusted
with
depositing
money
from
salespersons
before
handing
it
to
the
company
authorities.

Mada
further
alleged
that
company
authorities
found
that
the
safe
Banana
was
entrusted
with,
containing
US$
27,000,
had
not
been
tampered
with
while
doing
an
inventory
of
the
losses.
He
said:

They
then
asked
for
keys
from
the
accused
person
and
unlocked
the
safe.
Upon
opening
the
safe,
they
discovered
that
out
of
US$27
000,
only
US$2
600
was
left.
Upon
interviewing
her,
she
admitted
to
having
used
the
money.

He
said
Banana
was
arrested
the
following
day
after
a
night
of
extravagant
spending
spree
in
Bulawayo.

Post
published
in:

Featured

Fire disrupts business at Haddon and Sly complex in Bulawayo’s CBD

The
fire
brigade
swiftly
responded
to
the
scene
and
managed
to
contain
the
blaze.

When
the
CITE
news
team
arrived
at
the
complex,
business
owners
were
being
instructed
to
gather
their
belongings
and
close
up
for
the
day
as
the
fault
was
being
addressed.

Sources
within
the
complex
indicated
that
the
fire
originated
at
Shop
5L
on
the
ground
floor,
starting
in
the
ceiling
as
a
result
of
an
electrical
fault.

“The
fire
was
spreading
through
the
ceiling
and
slowly
advancing
towards
the
first
floor,
but
it
was
extinguished
before
it
could
reach
other
shops,”
they
said.

Several
shop
owners,
who
spoke
anonymously,
expressed
concerns
about
the
state
of
the
building’s
wiring,
saying
it
is
outdated
and
in
need
of
replacement.

“We
are
worried
about
the
safety
of
our
merchandise.
We
hope
the
issue
will
be
thoroughly
addressed
today,
identifying
the
root
cause
and
finding
a
lasting
solution
to
prevent
such
incidents
in
the
future,”
said
one
shop
owner.

A
witness
who
was
inside
the
building
when
the
fire
started
recounted,
“There
were
flames
in
the
ceiling
on
the
ground
floor,
and
we
saw
smoke
rising
to
the
first
floor.
We
were
quickly
told
to
evacuate
the
building.
It
was
a
frightening
experience,
but
we
are
relieved
that
it
was
brought
under
control
in
time.”

Business
owners
at
the
complex
are
eager
for
the
building
to
reopen
as
promised,
fearing
potential
revenue
loss.

“We’re
concerned
about
our
stock.
We
want
to
remove
it
from
the
premises
just
in
case
the
complex
remains
closed
for
an
extended
period.
Our
livelihood
depends
on
this
business,”
they
said.

One
businessperson
added,
“This
issue
needs
to
be
resolved
quickly.
The
building
owner
has
the
resources—after
all,
we
just
paid
rent
recently
and
didn’t
expect
this
to
happen.
Everyone
here
pays
on
time,
and
if
we’re
even
a
little
late,
they
lock
us
out.
We
hope
the
repairs
will
be
completed
by
the
end
of
the
day
so
that
we
can
resume
work
tomorrow.”

ZLHR condemns Senate approval of controversial PVO Amendment Bill

The
Senate
passed
the
PVO
Amendment
Bill
on
17
October
2024,
clearing
the
way
for
President
Emmerson
Mnangagwa
to
sign
it
into
law.

The
bill
was
initially
gazetted
on
1
March
2024
after
a
previous
version
from
2021
expired,
as
President
Mnangagwa
had
declined
to
sign
it,
citing
reservations.
The
latest
version,
however,
includes
even
stricter
provisions
than
its
predecessor.

ZLHR
expressed
serious
concerns
about
the
rapid
pace
of
the
Senate’s
deliberations,
which
it
claimed
lacked
adequate
debate
and
scrutiny.

“ZLHR
is
shocked
that
despite
clear
and
legitimate
concerns
from
a
significant
segment
of
local
civil
society
organizations
(CSOs),
citizens,
and
regional
and
international
bodies,
such
as
the
United
Nations
Special
Procedures,
regarding
the
PVO
Amendment
Bill’s
inconsistency
with
national,
regional,
and
global
standards
on
freedom
of
association,
this
harmful
law,
which
infringes
on
human
rights,
was
rushed
through
Parliament.
The
March
2024
version
mirrors
the
November
2021
one
but
with
even
more
repressive
provisions,”
ZLHR
said.

The
organisation
warned
that
if
enacted,
the
bill
would
significantly
undermine
Zimbabwe’s
commitment
to
human
rights,
especially
the
right
to
freedom
of
association.

“ZLHR
is
deeply
troubled
by
the
provisions
of
the
PVO
Amendment
Bill,
which
threaten
the
operations
of
CSOs.
Ultimately,
this
legislation
could
lead
to
the
closure
of
civic
space,
which
has
been
gradually
shrinking
since
August
2018.
The
bill
includes
measures
that
legitimize
excessive
executive
interference
in
CSO
operations,
criminalize
the
work
of
CSOs
and
their
leaders,
and
curtail
their
freedom
of
association.
It
also
seeks
to
concentrate
executive
power
in
the
registration
process
of
PVOs
through
the
Registrar’s
office,”
the
statement
continued.

“It
flagrantly
disregards
the
principles
of
association
outlined
in
the
African
Commission
on
Human
and
Peoples’
Rights’
Guidelines
on
Freedom
of
Association
and
Assembly
in
Africa.”

ZLHR
stressed
that
the
bill
threatens
civil
society’s
ability
to
operate
freely,
undermining
its
role
in
defending
human
rights
and
providing
essential
services.

In
contrast,
the
government,
represented
by
Minister
of
Justice,
Legal
and
Parliamentary
Affairs
Ziyambi
Ziyambi,
has
defended
the
bill
as
a
necessary
measure
to
comply
with
the
Financial
Action
Task
Force
(FATF)
recommendations,
which
aim
to
combat
money
laundering,
terrorism
financing,
and
other
illicit
financial
activities.

While
ZLHR
acknowledged
the
importance
of
addressing
financial
crimes,
it
accused
the
government
of
selectively
applying
FATF
standards
to
justify
restrictive
measures
on
CSOs.
The
organisation
also
criticised
the
government
for
overlooking
the
FATF’s
revised
2016
standards,
which
call
for
proportionate,
risk-based
measures
that
do
not
disrupt
legitimate
charitable
activities.

“In
fact,
the
government
has
ignored
the
FATF’s
Revised
2016
Standards
and
Methodology,
which
emphasize
that
measures
to
protect
not-for-profit
organizations
(NPOs)
from
potential
abuse
should
be
risk-based
and
should
not
unduly
disrupt
legitimate
activities.
The
FATF’s
‘High-Level
Synopsis
of
the
Stock
Take
of
the
Unintended
Consequences
of
the
FATF
Standards,’
released
on
27
October
2021,
underscores
the
need
for
targeted
and
balanced
approaches
that
respect
international
human
rights
obligations,”
ZLHR
stated.

The
organisation
further
accused
the
Zimbabwean
government
of
using
FATF
guidelines
as
a
pretext
to
impose
unwarranted
restrictions
on
civil
society.

“The
Zimbabwean
government
continues
to
misuse
the
FATF
Recommendations
and
Standards
to
shrink
civic
space.
Disappointingly,
it
ignored
the
November
2023
revision
of
FATF’s
Recommendation
8
Interpretive
Note,
which
clarified
that
governments
should
adopt
focused,
proportionate,
and
risk-based
measures
to
address
terrorism
financing
risks.
This
includes
acknowledging
self-regulatory
mechanisms
within
the
NPO
sector,
which
should
negate
the
need
for
additional
state
interventions
if
they
are
deemed
adequate,”
ZLHR
said.

ZLHR
called
on
President
Mnangagwa
to
refrain
from
signing
the
bill,
warning
that
it
could
have
profound
implications
for
Zimbabwe’s
human
rights,
humanitarian,
and
development
sectors.

“Zimbabwe
already
has
a
comprehensive
regulatory
framework
for
combating
money
laundering
and
terrorism
financing,
which
can
be
applied
to
this
sector.
This
framework
includes
several
laws,
policies,
and
practices
designed
to
prevent
these
activities
and
hold
offenders
accountable.
ZLHR
urges
President
Mnangagwa
and
the
government
to
respect
the
will
of
the
majority
of
Zimbabweans
and
to
avoid
enacting
legislation
that
tramples
on
the
people’s
aspirations.”

The
group
also
called
for
adherence
to
the
African
Commission
on
Human
and
Peoples’
Rights
guidelines
on
freedom
of
association
and
assembly,
urging
the
government
to
respect
Zimbabweans’
rights
and
aspirations.

Rangers find 3 lions killed with heads and paws removed at Hwange National Park

HARARE

Three
lions
were
killed
and
had
their
paws
and
heads
removed
at
Hwange
National
Park
on
Monday
night,
officials
said.

Officials
from
the
department
of
parks
and
wildlife
believe
the
killings
were
for
ritual
purposes.

Parks
spokesman
Tinashe
Farawo
said:
“Our
rangers
discovered
the
carcasses
of
three
lions
on
Tuesday
morning

two
females
and
one
subadult
male.

“On
Sunday,
these
lions
were
seen
hunting
a
zebra.
They
spent
Sunday
and
Monday
feeding.
We
believe
they
were
killed
sometime
on
Monday
night
by
poachers
who
also
chopped
off
and
removed
their
heads
and
paws.”


Farawo
said
a
high
calibre
rifle
had
been
used
to
kill
the
animals.

Lions
are
mainly
targeted
by
trophy
hunters,
but
conservationists
also
say
there
are
ritualistic
killings
taking
place
as
the
king
of
the
jungle
is
seen
as
symbolising
power,
strength
and
nobility.

Trade
in
lion
parts,
although
considered
small,
is
said
to
involve
traditional
healers
who
use
them
in
ritual
practices,
typically
to
help
clients
who
want
to
be
respected
or
feared
in
the
workplace,
family
or
society
in
general.

Mindless
killing

One
of
the
lions
shot
inside
the
Hwange
National
Park
on
October
22,
2024,
allegedly
for
ritual
purposes

Hwange
National
Park,
Zimbabwe’s
biggest
game
reserve
stretching
for
some
14,600
square
kilometers,
is
home
to
at
least
500
lions.

In
the
four
years
between
2019
and
2023,
Farawo
said
19
lions
had
been
killed
by
poachers
inside
the
park.

Opposition leader Ngarivhume granted bail after 82-day pre-trial detention

HARARE

Jacob
Ngarivhume,
the
leader
of
opposition
party
Transform
Zimbabwe,
was
granted
bail
by
the
Harare
High
Court
on
Wednesday.

He
spent
82
days
in
pre-trial
incarceration.

Justice
Emilia
Muchawa
ordered
Ngarivhume
freed
on
US$100
bail.
Conditions
of
the
bail
include
surrendering
his
passport
and
a
prohibition
against
posting
on
social
media
platform,
X.

Ngarivhume
was
arrested
on
August
2
in
the
run-up
to
a
SADC
heads
of
state
summit
in
Harare
on
August
17,
during
which
the
government
feared
protests
by
pro-democracy
activists.
Over
100
activists
were
detained
across
the
country
and
dozens
remain
imprisoned
awaiting
trial,
according
to
rights
lawyers.


The
Transform
Zimbabwe
leader
is
accused
of
disorderly
conduct
in
a
public
place
and
participating
in
an
illegal
gathering
with
intent
to
promote
public
violence,
crimes
he
allegedly
committed
in
June
this
year.

We’re Big Fans Of Our Advertisers On ATL – Above the Law




<br /> We’re<br /> Big<br /> Fans<br /> Of<br /> Our<br /> Advertisers<br /> On<br /> ATL<br /> –<br /> Above<br /> the<br /> Law


























We’d
like
to
express
gratitude
to
our
fantastic
sponsors
here
at
Above
the
Law:

If
you’re
interested
in
advertising
on
Above
the
Law
or
any
other
site
in
the
Breaking
Media
network,
please download
our
media
kits
 or email
advertising
.

Pocket Watching Trump Judge Wants To Control Law School Donations – Above the Law

Who
is
supposed
to
have
a
say
on
the
interpretive
models
students
learn
in
law
schools?
Judges
apparently!
Right
wingers
used
to
attack
lefties
for
boycotts
and
cancel
culture,
but
those
are

core
right-wing
policing
strategies
these
days
,
with
Republican
judges
wearing
their
politics
on
their
sleeves
when
it
comes
to
bullying
law
schools
into
doing
what
they
want.
First
it
was

boycotting
the
students
from
law
schools
deemed
too
liberal
,
now
they’re
trying
to
get
school
funding
cut
if
professors
don’t
teach
the
way
the
judges
prefer.

Bloomberg
Law

has
coverage:

Conservative
appeals
court
Judge
Amul
Thapar
called
on
donors
to
withhold
support
from
law
schools
that
don’t
hire
an
ideologically
diverse
faculty
and
teach
originalist
theory.

Thapar,
a
Trump
appointee
to
the
US
Court
of
Appeals
for
the
Sixth
Circuit
and
Supreme
Court
short
lister,
criticized
what
he
said
is
an
absence
in
originalist
teaching
at
top
law
schools
during
remarks
Wednesday
at
the
Heritage
Foundation.

Thapar
went
on
to
lament
that
the
failure
to
teach
law
students
an
Originalist
approach
to
the
text
ultimately
hurts
them
because
judges
may
be
more
amenable
to
matters
if
they
hear
history
based
analysis.
Nice
theory,
but
we
regularly
see
judges
craft
opinions
getting
the
history
wildly
wrong.
At
least
according
to
the
actual
historians.
Here
are
just
a
few
times
that
judges
opted
to
ignore
historical
context
to
arrive
at
the
policy
outcomes
they
preferred:ignoring
the
history
of
the
14th
Amendment
to
read
it
as
colorblind
,

ignoring
the
history
of
gun
regulation
to
get
their
desired
policy
outcome
in

Bruen
,
not
to
mention

making
ahistorical
arguments
about
the
role
of
special
counsel
if
it
helps
Trump
avoid
trouble
.
Oh,
and
just
for
shiggles,
because
those
are
some
heavy
cases,
no
one
even
tried
to
invoke
history
to
potentially
correct
the
flawed
textualism

of
simple
words
like
“boneless
.”

Promoting
Originalism
and
“diversity
of
thought”
are
the
bits
of
velvet
on
the
glove.
“Do
what
we
say
or
we
attack
your
bottom
line.”
Read
his
own
words:

“Make
no
mistake:
money
talks.
Only
when
the
taxpayers
and
donors
alike
demand
it
will
law
schools
start
to
change,”
Thapar
said.
“When
law
schools
do
change,
the
hefty
price
paid
for
a
law
degree
might
actually
be
worth
it,
because
lawyers
will
leave
law
school
equipped
to
practice
in
today’s
courts.”

If
you
really
want
to
prepare
law
students
for
today’s
courts,
originalism
is
the
least
of
their
concerns.
You
need
to
teach
them
how
to

bankroll
judges
,

romance
them
,

have
ex-parte
chats
with
the
prosecution
,
or
find
a
way
to
get
all
of
their
colleagues
to

agree
they
aren’t
mentally
fit
if
they
write
too
many
dissenting
opinions
.
In
a
word,
you’ve
gotta
teach
students
how
to
politic.
Because
the
judiciary
stopped
being
focused
on
historical
meaning
a
long
time
ago.


Judge
Urges
Law
School
Donation
Halt
Until
Originalism
Taught

[Bloomberg
Law]



Chris
Williams
became
a
social
media
manager
and
assistant
editor
for
Above
the
Law
in
June
2021.
Prior
to
joining
the
staff,
he
moonlighted
as
a
minor
Memelord™
in
the
Facebook
group Law
School
Memes
for
Edgy
T14s
.
 He
endured
Missouri
long
enough
to
graduate
from
Washington
University
in
St.
Louis
School
of
Law.
He
is
a
former
boatbuilder
who
cannot
swim, a
published
author
on
critical
race
theory,
philosophy,
and
humor
,
and
has
a
love
for
cycling
that
occasionally
annoys
his
peers.
You
can
reach
him
by
email
at [email protected] and
by
tweet
at @WritesForRent.