Midlevel Biglaw Associates Are Really Tired – Above the Law



Ed.
note
:
Welcome
to
our
daily
feature,

Quote
of
the
Day
.


That
I
wouldn’t
sleep.




A
midlevel
associate
at
an
undisclosed
firm,
in
response
to
a
question
found
in
the

American
Lawyer
Midlevel
Associates
Survey

about
what
surprised
them
most
about
working
at
their
current
firm.
More
notable
and
quotable
responses
can
be
found

here
.



Staci ZaretskyStaci
Zaretsky
 is
a
senior
editor
at
Above
the
Law,
where
she’s
worked
since
2011.
She’d
love
to
hear
from
you,
so
please
feel
free
to

email

her
with
any
tips,
questions,
comments,
or
critiques.
You
can
follow
her
on

X/Twitter

and

Threads

or
connect
with
her
on

LinkedIn
.

Hard To Show Your Work On The Shadow Docket – Above the Law

via
Twitter

In
the
days
of
old,
reading
judicial
opinions
was
a
(relatively)
easy
way
to
understand
how
and
why
the
Supreme
Court
justices
arrived
at
a
legal
conclusion
to
a
pressing
issue.
Now
you
have
to
hope
that
their
rationale
isn’t
black
boxed
behind
the
shadow
docket,
a
once
boring
way
of
dealing
with
procedural
matters
that
has
morphed
into
determining
huge
legal
questions
pertaining
to

abortion
,

the
EPA
,
the
list
goes
on.
Even
the
justices
have
complained
about
the
morphing
importance
the
shadow
docket
is
taking
on.
Most
recent
is
Justice
Kagan;

Reuters

has
coverage:

Justice
Elena
Kagan
said
the
U.S.
Supreme
Court
would
be
better
off
spending
less
time
hurrying
through
cases
on
its
emergency
docket.

“It’s
a
very
hard
problem,”
Kagan
said
on
Monday
in
an
hour-long
interview
with
a
professor
at
New
York
University’s
law
school.
“I
don’t
think
we
do
our
best
work
in
this
way.”

There’s
no
denying
the
bit
about
shadow
docketing
not
being
their
best
work.
That
said,
when
their
work
includes
things
like

Clarence
Thomas
appreciating
how
skilled
you
have
to
be
to
mow
down
a
crowd
with
a
bump
stock

or

Justice
Kagan’s
Seussian
footnoting
,
it
isn’t
like
there’s
much
competition.


US
Supreme
Court’s
Kagan
Says
Emergency
Docket
Does
Not
Lead
To
Court’s
Best
Work

[Reuters]


Earlier
:

Is
This
How
Abortion
Goes
Out?
Not
With
A
Bang,
But
A
Whimper


The
Shadow
Docket
Has
Gotten
So
Bad,
Even
John
Roberts
Is
Pissed
About
It


Ketanji
Brown
Jackson
Rails
Against
Supreme
Court’s
Over
Use
Of
Shadow
Docket



Chris
Williams
became
a
social
media
manager
and
assistant
editor
for
Above
the
Law
in
June
2021.
Prior
to
joining
the
staff,
he
moonlighted
as
a
minor
Memelord™
in
the
Facebook
group Law
School
Memes
for
Edgy
T14s
.
 He
endured
Missouri
long
enough
to
graduate
from
Washington
University
in
St.
Louis
School
of
Law.
He
is
a
former
boatbuilder
who
cannot
swim, a
published
author
on
critical
race
theory,
philosophy,
and
humor
,
and
has
a
love
for
cycling
that
occasionally
annoys
his
peers.
You
can
reach
him
by
email
at [email protected] and
by
tweet
at @WritesForRent.

Former Judge Gets Caught Mocking Lawyer On Livestream – Above the Law

Having
a
thought
doesn’t
mean
you
are
obliged
to
share
it.
That’s
where
good
judgment
comes
in,
which
is
the
sort
of
skill
you’d
expect
from
a
person
who
judges
for
a
living.
Unfortunately,
judges
make
mistakes.
Even
worse,
this
judge’s
screw-up
was
caught
on
camera.
The

Legal
Profession
Blog

has
coverage:

Judge
[William
Burnett
Raines]
has
been
charged
with
an
ethics
violation
by
the
Illinois
Administrator
for
comments
he
made
when
he
thought
he
was
not
being
live-streamed
after
a
hearing
where
counsel
had
participated
remotely

Respondent,
mistakenly
believing
that
the
virtual
feed
of
his
courtroom
had
ended,
then
engaged
in
a
conversation
with
the
Assistant
State’s
Attorneys
and
Assistant
Public
Defenders
physically
present
in
his
courtroom
about
the
just
concluded
Myles
matter,
and,
specifically,
about
Mr.
Myles’s
attorneys,
Ms.
Bonjean
and
Mr.
Kennedy.
During
that
conversation,
Respondent,
referring
to
Ms.
Bonjean,
stated:
“Did
you
see
her
going
nuts?
Glasses
off,
fingers
through
her
hair,
the
phone’s
going
all
over
the
place.
It’s
insane.”
Respondent
further
stated
that
Ms.
Bonjean’s
behavior
“was
entertaining”
for
him
and
inquired:
“Can
you
imagine
waking
up
to
her
every
day?
Oh
my
God.”
Respondent
further
stated,
“You
know
what?
I
couldn’t
have
a
visual
on
that
if
you
paid
me.
There
you
have
it.”

Judges
generally
call
the
shots
when
it
comes
to
their
courtrooms,
but
there
are
just
some
things
you
don’t
say
when
you’re
at
work!
After
catching
wind
of
Judge
Raines’s
comments,
Ms.
Bonjean
filed
to
preserve
a
recording
of
the
livestream.
Upon
hearing
that,
Judge
Raines
probably
went
nuts,
glasses
off,
fingers
through
his
hair,
wondering
why
in
the
hell
he’d
say
that
while
a
camera
was
running.
It’s
insane.

The
takeaway
lesson
should
be
that
if
the
robes
are
on,
you
are
too.
Being
buddy-buddy
with
a
coworker
doesn’t
alleviate
you
of
your
obligation
to
be
impartial
at
your
workplace.
Save
that
conversation
for
the
bar
after
hours

and
try
to
notice
if
you’re
being
recorded.


Loose
Lips

[Legal
Profession
Blog]



Chris
Williams
became
a
social
media
manager
and
assistant
editor
for
Above
the
Law
in
June
2021.
Prior
to
joining
the
staff,
he
moonlighted
as
a
minor
Memelord™
in
the
Facebook
group Law
School
Memes
for
Edgy
T14s
.
 He
endured
Missouri
long
enough
to
graduate
from
Washington
University
in
St.
Louis
School
of
Law.
He
is
a
former
boatbuilder
who
cannot
swim, a
published
author
on
critical
race
theory,
philosophy,
and
humor
,
and
has
a
love
for
cycling
that
occasionally
annoys
his
peers.
You
can
reach
him
by
email
at [email protected] and
by
tweet
at @WritesForRent.

Suicide Prevention In The Legal Profession – Above the Law

In
the
summer
of
2005,
I
decided
to
end
my
life
by
suicide.
I
was
lucky
to
have
family
intervene,
or
I
might
not
be
here
today.





Brian
Cuban
 (@bcuban) is The
Addicted
Lawyer
.
Brian
is
the
author
of
the
Amazon
best-selling
book,



The
Addicted
Lawyer:
Tales
Of
The
Bar,
Booze,
Blow
&
Redemption


(affiliate
link).
A
graduate
of
the
University
of
Pittsburgh
School
of
Law,
he
somehow
made
it
through
as
an
alcoholic
then
added
cocaine
to
his
résumé
as
a
practicing
attorney.
He
went
into
recovery
April
8,
2007.
He
left
the
practice
of
law
and
now
writes
and
speaks
on
recovery
topics,
not
only
for
the
legal
profession,
but
on
recovery
in
general.
He
can
be
reached
at 
[email protected].

Prepare For A Giant! – See Also – Above the Law

*
Justice
Kagan
points
out
that
issuing
opaque,
from
the
hip,
ideologically
motivated
opinions
results
in
terrible
work.
[Reuters]

*
Womble
Bond
merging
with
Lewis
Roca.
[WBD]

*
SPLC
Union
approve
no
confidence
motion
aimed
at
the
law
center’s
leadership.
[Alabama
Reflector
]

*
In
an
entirely
predictable
turn
of
events,
attorney
working
on
anti-Trans
rights
Supreme
Court
case
tied
to
racist
social
media
posts.
[WIRED]

*
Um…
we’re
pretty
cynical
around
here
but
more
people
should
like
law
school.
[ABA
Journal
]

*
Fake
money
investor
sues
Biglaw
firm.
[Cointelegraph]

*
Don’t
wanna
shock
you,
but
science
lawyers
might
be
an
IP
fit.
[LegalCheek]

UK-Based Biglaw Firm Continues In Its Quest To Conquer US Legal Markets – Above the Law

Bigger
is
always
better
when
it
comes
to
Biglaw

and
Kennedys,
a
UK-founded
firm,
is
setting
its
sights
on
increasing
its
size
in
the
United
States.

As
first
noted
by
the

American
Lawyer
,
Kennedys
is
adding
two
new
offices
to
its
US
offerings,
opening
spaces
in
Los
Angeles
and
Seattle
as
part
of
its
“ongoing
strategic
expansion”
in
America.
These
new
additions
will
increase
the
firm’s
US
office
count
to
12
and
total
office
count
to
47.
Am
Law
has
more
details:

“Kennedys
offices
in
North
America
have
seen
strong
growth
over
the
last
three
years,
with
a
62%
increase
in
headcount.
We
now
have
215
attorneys
servicing
our
clients
across
the
U.S.,”
said
Meg
Catalano,
regional
managing
partner
in
the
US,
in
a
statement.
“The
opening
of
these
new
offices
expands
our
physical
presence
on
the
West
Coast,
allowing
us
to
service
increasing
client
demand
across
the
region.”

Kennedys
first
established
itself
in
the
US
in
2017,
and
attributed
much
of
its
revenue
and
profit
growth
last
year
to
its
presence
and
performance
in
the
US.

Best
of
luck
to
the
firm
as
it
continues
its
US
expansion.


With
US
Expansion
‘Ongoing,’
Kennedys
Launches
2
More
Offices
on
West
Coast

[American
Lawyer]



Staci ZaretskyStaci
Zaretsky
 is
a
senior
editor
at
Above
the
Law,
where
she’s
worked
since
2011.
She’d
love
to
hear
from
you,
so
please
feel
free
to

email

her
with
any
tips,
questions,
comments,
or
critiques.
You
can
follow
her
on

X/Twitter

and

Threads

or
connect
with
her
on

LinkedIn
.

Prepare For A Giant! – See Also – Above the Law

*
Justice
Kagan
points
out
that
issuing
opaque,
from
the
hip,
ideologically
motivated
opinions
results
in
terrible
work.
[Reuters]

*
Womble
Bond
merging
with
Lewis
Roca.
[WBD]

*
SPLC
Union
approve
no
confidence
motion
aimed
at
the
law
center’s
leadership.
[Alabama
Reflector
]

*
In
an
entirely
predictable
turn
of
events,
attorney
working
on
anti-Trans
rights
Supreme
Court
case
tied
to
racist
social
media
posts.
[WIRED]

*
Um…
we’re
pretty
cynical
around
here
but
more
people
should
like
law
school.
[ABA
Journal
]

*
Fake
money
investor
sues
Biglaw
firm.
[Cointelegraph]

*
Don’t
wanna
shock
you,
but
science
lawyers
might
be
an
IP
fit.
[LegalCheek]

White Stripes Join Long List Of Artists Telling Trump To Get Bent – Above the Law

(Photo
by
Stephen
Lovekin/WireImage)

Yesterday,
the
White
Stripes
joined
the
long
list
of
artists
suing
Donald
Trump,
whose
campaign
seems
to
take
a
“record
first,
license
later”
approach
to
media
releases.

This
time,
Trump’s
comms
team
expropriated
the
iconic
riff
from
the
band’s
2003
song
“Seven
Nation
Army”
and
released
it
on
social
media
in
an
August
29
video
of
Trump
boarding
a
plane
with
the
caption
“President
@realDonaldTrump
departs
for
Michigan
and
Wisconsin!”
Was
it
a
secret
reference
to
the
former
president’s

wish

to
bring
Russia
back
to
the
G7,
despite
the
protestations
of
the
other
member
nations
that

we
do
not
reward
nations
that
invade
their
neighbors?

Or
was
it
simple
theft?

The

suit

is
a
fun
read:

As
a
self-professed
sophisticated
and
successful
businessman
with
decades-long
experience
in
the
entertainment
industry
(not
to
mention
being
on
the
receiving
end
of
numerous
copyright
claims
by
musical
artists
whose
work
he
used
without
permission),
Defendant
Trump
and
the
other
Defendants,
his
agents,
knew
or
should
have
known
that
the
use
of
the
7NA
Works
in
the
Infringing
Trump
Videos
was
unauthorized,
and,
therefore,
violated
Plaintiffs’
rights
under
the
Copyright
Act.

The
artists
Jack
White
and
Meg
White
note
that
they
put
Trump
and
his
henchman
on
notice
that
they
oppose
the
use,
since
they
publicly
declared
they
were
“disgusted
by
that
association”

when


Trump
played
their
music
at
campaign
rallies
in
2016.
They
add
that
they
reached
out
to
the
campaign
to
protest
the
most
recent
video
and
received
no
response.

This
case
would
appear
to
be
qualitatively
different
from
the
one
filed
recently
by
the
estate
of
Isaac
Hayes,
which
claims
to
own
the
rights
to
the
song
“Hold
on,
I’m
Comin’”
sung
by
Sam
and
Dave.
In
that

case
,
the
plaintiffs
allege
that
Trump
lacks
a
performance
license
to
use
the
song
at
rallies

typically
a
blanket
authorization
covering
multiple
works.
The
court

preliminarily
enjoined

the
campaign
from
playing
the
work
pending
further
proceedings.

In
contrast,
the
Whites
assert
that
Trump
should
have
negotiated
an
individual
synchronization
license
with
them
directly

or
tried
to
anyway

since
this
was
not
a
public
performance
but
a
produced
video.
They
claim
significant
damages,
for
the
cost
to
license
the
song,
“direct
and
indirect
financial
contributions
from
the
public
in
response
to
the
Infringing
Trump
Videos,”
and
“sales
of
campaign
and
related
merchandise.”

But
all
is
not
bad
news
for
the
candidate.
The
case
was
assigned
to
Judge
Mary
Vyskocil,
a
Trump
appointee
who
was

highly
receptive

last
year
to
attempts
by
his
congressional
allies
Jim
Jordan
and
James
Comer
to

harass

District
Attorney
Alvin
Bragg
over
the
false
business
records
indictment.
Maybe
Her
Honor
will
be
receptive
to
whatever
transformative/parody/fair
use/reporters
privilege
argument
Trump
and
his
sparklemagic
lawyers
cook
up.


White
v.
Trump

[Docket
via
Court
Listener]





Liz
Dye
 lives
in
Baltimore
where
she
produces
the
Law
and
Chaos substack and podcast.

A Lawyer’s Guide To Boosting Client Loyalty: The Promised Land For Business Development – Above the Law

As
a
business
development
coach
and
trainer
exclusive
to
attorneys,
I
have
the
rare
privilege
of
speaking
with
thousands
of
lawyers
a
year
about
growing
their
law
practices.
Part
of
my
“Sales-Free
Selling”
strategy
is
to
ask
A
LOT
of
questions.
The
goal
of
this
is
to
understand
what
each
lawyers’
strengths
are
as
a
business
developer
and
even
more
importantly,
where
their
gaps
may
be.
In
many
instances
a
lawyer
may
be
investing
way
too
much
time
and
effort
in
the
wrong
places.
I
joke
sometimes
that
it’s
like
there’s
a
table
in
front
of
them
with
millions
of
dollars
stacked
up
high. 
They
seem
to
be
walking
around
it
all
day,
and
not
into
it.
The
goal
of
working
with
any
BD
coach
isn’t
to
work
harder,
but
rather
smarter
to
bring
in
the
business.
So,
let’s
spend
some
time
today
talking
about
where
the
real
money
is
hiding
and
how
to
get
after
it.

Imagine
that
you’re
standing
in
front
of
an
apple
tree,
which
is
loaded
with
fresh
apples.
Some
of
these
apples
are
literally
right
in
front
of
your
face,
while
others
are
way
up
high
in
the
tree.
For
the
sake
of
efficiency,
where
do
you
select
the
apples?
The
lower
apples
may
seem
like
an
obvious
choice,
however
many
attorneys
are
still
working
entirely
too
hard
climbing
ladders
reaching
for
those
elevated
apples.
When
discussing
low-hanging
fruit
with
my
attorney
clients,
I
always
start
with
a
discussion
of
their
existing
clients.
Our
goal
is
to
uncover
opportunities,
which
will
produce
the
highest
possible
value
for
the
time
invested.

Before
you
can
begin
selecting
apples
you
must
plant
the
seeds
and
water
the
trees.
As
this
relates
to
leveraging
existing
clients,
a
myth
must
be
eradicated
first.
The
myth
is
simple:
if
you
service
your
client
properly,
they
will
be
loyal
to
you.
If
you
believe
this
for
even
a
moment,
you
are
in
for
a
rude
awakening.
Times
have
changed
and
so
must
you
in
the
way
you
manage
your
client
relationships.
Statistically,
it’s
six
times
more
work
and
energy
to
find
a
new
client
than
to
keep
an
existing
one.
That
being
said,
we
all
have
to
step
up
our
game
to
ensure
that
client
loyalty
is
developed
with
intent.
One
of
the
best
ways
to
accomplish
this
is
to
develop
a
client
retention
and
loyalty
plan.

Before
groaning
at
the
idea
of
writing
a
plan,
I
assure
you
this
shouldn’t
take
more
than
an
hour
to
accomplish
and
can
make
the
difference
between
success
and
failure
in
maintaining
and
building
your
law
practice.
Here
are
the
three
important
elements
of

client
retention
and
loyalty
plan:


Step
1.

Develop
a
list
of
your
key
clients
and
rank
them
as
an
“A,
B,
or
C”
client.
The
simple
truth
is
that
all
clients
are
not
created
equal.
Some
love
you
and
throw
a
ton
of
work
your
way,
while
others
may
be
more
distant,
and
the
work
is
hit
or
miss.
Whatever
the
case,
I
suggest
three
qualifiers
for
determining
what
makes
up
an
“A,
B,
or
C”
client.
Ask
yourself
questions
about
each
client
and
BE
HONEST.

  • How
    good
    is
    my
    relationship?
  • Is
    this
    a
    relationship
    that
    I
    can
    develop
    and
    expand?
  • Are
    we
    friends
    socially
    or
    is
    our
    relationship
    more
    transactional
    in
    nature?
  • Do
    they
    call
    me
    for
    general
    business
    advice
    or
    just
    about
    the
    deals?
  • Have
    I
    helped
    my
    client
    in
    ways
    beyond
    just
    providing
    legal
    advice?

Next,
try
to
determine
how
much
opportunity
the
client
has
to
grow
or
how
connected
this
client
may
be.

  • Do
    they
    have
    a
    solid
    network
    of
    decision
    makers
    to
    introduce
    me
    to?
  • Is
    the
    company
    growing
    and
    expanding?
  • Are
    there
    opportunities
    to
    cross-market
    and
    share
    work
    with
    my
    partners?

The
last
factor
in
determining
who
to
invest
the
most
time
with
relates
directly
to
the
amount
each
client
has
invested
with
you
and
your
like
or
dislike
of
this
client.

  • Does
    this
    client
    invest
    a
    significant
    amount
    of
    dollars
    with
    you,
    or
    did
    they
    invest
    little
    over
    the
    past
    few
    years?
  • Was
    this
    client
    a
    complete
    nightmare
    to
    deal
    with?
  • Did
    the
    client
    cost
    my
    firm
    money
    due
    to
    poor
    follow-through?
  • Did
    the
    client
    continually
    question
    and
    argue
    my
    rate?

Based
on
these
three
factors
and
any
others
that
you
believe
to
be
important,
invest
20
minutes
to
create
a
master
list
of
your
top
A,
B,
and
C
clients
so
that
you
can
move
on
with
the
next
step
of
this
plan.
A
simple
excel
spreadsheet
works
well
for
this
task.


Step
2:

Develop
a
list
of
touch
points
to
help
ensure
that
you
are
investing
the
right
amount
of
time
with
the
right
clients.
Based
on
their
ranking,
you
are
going
to
do
more
for
the
high-ranked
clients
and
less
for
the
lower-ranked
clients.
To
be
clear,
if
you
have
a
“B”
that
you
want
to
make
an
“A”
then
be
sure
to
increase
the
amount
of
touch
points
with
that
specific
client.
Here
are
a
few
examples
of
different
touch
points
that
you
can
use
to
develop
stronger
and
stickier
relationships:

  • If
    they
    are
    on
    social
    media,
    comment
    and
    share
    their
    posts
    (LinkedIn
    being
    the
    go-to
    here).
  • Schedule
    a
    lunch
    or
    coffee
    meeting
    with
    your
    client.
  • Go
    out
    for
    drinks
    and
    get
    to
    know
    one
    another
    better.
  • Send
    a
    card
    or
    gift
    on
    their
    birthdays
    and
    for
    the
    holidays.
  • Take
    your
    client
    to
    a
    game
    or
    concert.
    (It’s
    important
    to
    know
    what
    they
    are
    into.)
  • Call
    your
    client
    to
    see
    how
    you
    can
    help
    their
    business.
  • Email
    or
    call
    your
    client
    to
    congratulate
    them
    on
    something
    they’ve
    accomplished
    (business
    or
    personally).
  • Email
    your
    client
    with
    an
    article
    that
    is
    relevant
    to
    their
    business.
    (You
    can
    use
    RSS
    feeds
    for
    this.
    Look
    it
    up).
  • Invite
    your
    client
    to
    a
    high-level
    networking
    event
    or
    to
    sit
    on
    a
    panel.
  • Be
    a
    resource
    for
    your
    client.
    Find
    them
    a
    new
    vendor,
    strategic
    partner,
    or
    an
    actual
    new
    client.

To
make
this
super
easy,
take
out
a
sheet
of
paper.
Do
it
now,
I’ll
wait

.
Start
by
drawing
two
lines
down
the
page
so
you
have
three
equal
columns.
On
the
top
left,
write
the
letter
“A,”
for
the
middle
top,
“B,”
and
on
the
right
top,
“C.”
Then
begin
to
write
out
the
various
activities
or
follow
ups
that
you
want
to
engage
in
with
your
A’s,
B’s
and
C’s.
Again,
the
goal
is
to
invest
more
time
with
your
higher-profile
clients
then
with
your
lower-profile
ones.
For
example,
you
might
want
to
have
lunch
with
your
“A”
clients
four
times
a
year,
call
each
one
monthly,
email
each
one
monthly,
and
find
a
solid
contact
for
them
twice
a
year.
Again,
the
“B”
clients
would
get
less
of
your
attention
and
time,
unless
you
want
to
make
that
client
an
“A-lister.”

These
are
just
a
few
of
the
many
things
you
can
do
to
stay
in
constant
contact
and
help
ensure
longevity
with
your
clients.
The
side
effect
of
this
activity
will
be
to
open
up
more
doors
for
additional
business
and
much
needed
referrals.
The
stronger
the
relationship
becomes,
the
less
likely
that
the
client
will
leave
over
your
rates
or
being
charmed
away
by
another
lawyer.


Step
3.

Scheduling
time
to
execute
on
your
plan
is
paramount
to
your
success.
While
it’s
great
to
set
up
a
plan,
it’s
not
worth
the
paper
it’s
written
on
if
you
don’t
implement
it.
My
best
suggestion
here
is
to
find
30
to
60
minutes
a
week
and
schedule
time
as
“client
loyalty
and
development
time.”
Without
making
the
time
and
setting
it
aside,
this
plan
will
never
work
for
you.
There
will
always
be
work
and
distractions
keeping
you
from
this
important
task.
Look
at
your
calendar
and
find
a
spot
weekly
where
you
are
least
likely
to
be
distracted
or
busy.
You
can
even
do
some
of
this
work
on
the
train,
in
the
evenings,
or
on
the
weekends.
I
set
many
of
my
clients
up
with
accountability
buddy
groups
to
ensure
their
biz-dev
gets
done
rain
or
shine.

With
this
plan,
you
now
have
a
clear
choice
to
invest
more
time
with
client
relationships
that
already
exist,
or
you
could
go
off
attending
countless
networking
events
to
meet
total
strangers.
These
two
options
aren’t
even
close
with
regards
to
investing
quality
time
and
have
high
potential
for
growth.
While
there
may
be
value
in
both
activities,
investing
time
with
people
who
already
know,
like,
and
trust
you
will
typically
bear
fruit
much
more
quickly.

The
concept
of
having
your
client
names
in
front
of
you
and
rated,
isn’t
a
new
one,
but
95%
of
the
attorneys
I
meet
with
don’t
have
anything
like
this
in
place.
Between
the
names
in
front
of
you
and
the
actions
to
implement
to
keep
in
close
contact,
you
will
find
that
the
rewards
for
these
efforts
will
be
undeniable.
I
hope
you
reread
this
and
execute
on
it
right
away.
Like
I
always
say
to
my
clients,
“Procrastination
is
the
enemy
of
success.”




Steve
Fretzin
is
a
bestselling
author,
host
of
the
BE
THAT
LAWYER
Podcast,
and
business
development
coach
exclusively
for
attorneys.
Steve
has
committed
his
career
to
helping
lawyers
learn
key
growth
skills
not
currently
taught
in
law
school.
His
clients
soon
become
top
rainmakers
and
credit
Steve’s
program
and
coaching
for
their
success.
He
can
be
reached
directly
by
email
at 
[email protected].
Or
you
can
easily
find
him
on
his
website
at 
www.fretzin.com or
LinkedIn
at 
https://www.linkedin.com/in/stevefretzin/.