Lithuania seizes Belarus shipment of fire trucks to Zimbabwe over sanctions

BULAWAYO

Lithuania
is
holding
onto
17
fire
engines
seized
in
March
2023
while
being
shipped
to
Zimbabwe
from
neighbouring
Belarus
which
is
under
European
Union
sanctions,
officials
said
on
Wednesday.

Zimbabwe’s
new
attorney
general
Virginia
Mabhiza,
appointed
last
September,
flew
to
the
small
European
country
earlier
this
year
on
a
mission
to
get
the
trucks
released
but
her
efforts
were
in
vain,
ZimLive
was
told.

Information
secretary
Ndavaningi
Mangwana
said
the
government
was
still
appealing
to
the
Lithuanians
to
release
the
fire
tenders.

“We
eagerly
await
the
release
of
the
fire
tenders.
These
fire
engines
will
be
critical
in
supporting
firefighting
operations,
protecting
life
and
property
as
well
as
preserving
Zimbabwe’s
world
heritage
sites
and
the
crucial
crops
that
defied
the
devastating
drought,”
Mangwana
said.


Priscilla
Misihairabwi
Mushonga,
Zimbabwe’s
ambassador
to
Sweden
who
also
oversees
Lithuania,
Finland,
Denmark
and
Norway
is
understood
to
have
also
been
engaged
in
meetings
with
the
Lithuanians
to
free
the
trucks
acquired
by
the
local
government
ministry
for
distribution
to
local
authorities.

Mabhiza
explained:
“17
fire
tenders
were
seized
on
March
7,
2023,
at
the
Malku
Bay
seaport
of
Klaipeda
in
Lithuania
.

“The
explanation
has
been
that
the
fire
tenders
or
certain
components
on
the
fire
tenders
were
manufactured
by
a
Belarusian
company
which
is
on
EU
sanctions
.

“Zimbabwe
maintains
that
we
are
an
innocent
third
party
who
bought
the
fire
tenders
without
any
knowledge
of
such
details.”

The
trucks
were
supplied
by
a
company
called
Red
Lion
under
an
opaque
deal
engineered
by
Belarusian
arms
dealer
Alexander
Zingman.

The
fire
tenders
were
being
delivered
through
Lithuania
to
a
port
on
the
Baltic
Sea
from
landlocked
Belarus
when
they
were
seized.

Belarus
is
under
European
Union
sanctions
since
2020
over
human
rights
abuses
under
its
tyrannical
leader
Aleksandr
Lukashenko.

During
the
same
period,
the
EU
also
had
targeted
sanctions
on
Zimbabwean
officials
and
certain
companies,
but
these
did
not
cover
trade
in
non-lethal
equipment

The
Zimbabwe
government
argues
that
the
Lithuanians
have
no
legal
basis
to
be
holding
onto
the
trucks.

Lithuania’s
foreign
ministry
has
not
responded
to
our
questions
over
the
seizure
of
the
fire
trucks.

Zimbabwe’s blueberry farmers chase booming demand but face funding woes

HARARE

Zimbabwean
farmers
aim
to
capitalise
on
increasing
global
demand
for
blueberries,
but
self-funded
growers
like
Willard
Zireva
cite
a
lack
of
finance
and
minimal
government
support
as
barriers.

Despite
being
one
of
the
fastest
growing
blueberry
producers
globally,
with
production
doubling
to
7,000
metric
tons
last
year
due
to
a
favourable
climate,
Zimbabwean
farmers
are
struggling
to
secure
financing
for
their
operations.

Zimbabwe’s
horticultural
exports,
driven
in
part
by
blueberries,
exceed
$100
million
annually.
The
sector’s
exports,
which
peaked
at
$140
million
in
1999,
were
disrupted
when
former
President
Robert
Mugabe
began
the
seizure
of
white-owned
farms
to
resettle
landless
black
citizens.

Despite
the
sector’s
recent
growth,
banks
remain
wary
of
financing
agriculture
due
to
uncertain
land
tenure,
making
it
challenging
for
black
farmers
like
Zireva
to
expand.


Blueberry
farming
in
Zimbabwe
is
currently
dominated
by
the
few
remaining
local
white
farmers,
many
of
whom
are
looking
for
foreign
investment
to
expand
operations.

Zimbabwe’s
banks
do
not
accept
the
99-year
leases
handed
by
the
government
to
resettled
farmers
as
collateral
for
borrowing.

The
banks
also
tend
to
be
reluctant
to
lend
to
farmers
because
the
state
has
in
the
past
arbitrarily
acquired
farmland,
including
from
some
Black
commercial
farmers.

Zireva
cultivates
12
hectares
of
blueberry
crops
at
his
Talana
farm
100km
west
of
Harare,
which
he
bought
freehold
in
the
1990s
before
the
land
seizures.

He
said
that
he
had
to
rely
on
personal
savings
to
plant
his
first
crop
after
a
local
bank
denied
him
funding.

“If
funding
is
available,
there
is
a
massive
growth
opportunity,”
he
told
Reuters.

Growing
a
hectare
of
blueberries
in
Zimbabwe
requires
at
least
$100,000
to
import
plants,
peat
pots
from
Europe,
and
special
shades
for
the
crops.

Other
costs
include
refrigerated
packaging
warehouses
and
water
resources.

“We
need
interventions
and
interventions
have
to
come
from
the
government.
Nobody
else,”
said
Zireva,
referring
to
concessional
funding
for
farmers.

The
finance
and
agriculture
ministries,
as
well
as
the
Bankers
Association
of
Zimbabwe
(BAZ),
did
not
immediately
respond
to
requests
for
comment.

Zireva’s
farm
aims
to
export
120
metric
tons
of
blueberries
to
the
United
Kingdom
and
East
Asia
this
year,
but
he
says
the
demand
far
exceeds
their
ability
to
supply.

His
farm
requires
$1.2
million
to
double
output,
he
added.

“We
are
hoping
that
we
can
get
funding
next
year
to
put
in
eight
hectares
so
that
we
get
to
20
(hectares),”
Zireva
said.

Zimbabwe’s
Horticultural
Development
Council
(HDC)
said
the
lack
of
long-term
finance
was
a
significant
barrier
to
the
sector’s
plans
to
double
blueberry
hectarage
to
1,500
hectares
by
2030.

HDC
CEO
Linda
Nielsen
told
Reuters
that
without
funding
“we
will
see
growth
in
the
blueberries
sector
coming
off
on
the
tonnage
side.
We
really
need
to
grow
the
hectarage
and
maintain
our
market
share.”

Reuters

Broadcasting authorities ban ads on prophets and traditional healers

HARARE

The
Broadcasting
Authority
of
Zimbabwe
(BAZ)
has
issued
a
directive
to
all
broadcasters,
prohibiting
the
airing
of
advertisements
promoting
prophets,
traditional
healers,
and
traditional
herbs
or
medicines
that
cannot
be
authenticated.

In
a
letter
addressed
to
the
chief
executives
of
Zimbabwe’s
leading
broadcasting
companies,
including
Zimbabwe
Broadcasting
Corporation,
ZiFM,
Star
FM,
and
several
community
radio
stations,
BAZ
reminded
stations
of
their
duty
to
protect
consumers
from
misleading
information.

The
authority
emphasized
that
the
ban
is
in
line
with
Section
23
(a)
&
(b)
of
the
Broadcasting
Services
(Code
of
Conduct
for
Broadcasters)
Regulations,
2023,
as
well
as
Section
27(4)(e)
of
the
Broadcasting
Services
(Licensing
and
Content)
Regulations,
2004.

The
move
aims
to
prevent
the
public
from
being
misled
by
unverified
claims
made
in
advertisements
from
churches
and
traditional
healers.


BAZ,
however,
clarified
that
the
directive
does
not
extend
to
discussions
or
debates
on
these
topics,
as
long
as
they
do
not
contain
advertising
content. Kukurigo

Morning Docket: 09.12.24 – Above the Law

*
Nevada
rejects
NCBE
test
to
forge
new
attorney
licensing
regime
front-loading
requirements
during
law
school
so
“law
graduates
could
be
cleared
to
practice
within
weeks
of
completing
their
studies.”
[Reuters]

*
Judge
settles
suit
with
law
firm
that
threatened
to
release
nude
photos.
[ABA
Journal
]

*
A&O
Shearman
blasted
by
senior
attorneys
over
shock
office
closure.
[Law.com
International
]

*
Train
CEO
fired
after
taking
a
break
from
causing
labor
disputes
and
derailments
to
have
an
affair
with
the
general
counsel.
[CNN]

*
Former
Biglaw
tech
staffer
caught
selling
firm
laptops.
How
much
do
6-year-old
Dells
go
for
anyway?
[LegalCheek]

*
Latest
post-Chevron
casualty:
mental
health.
[Bloomberg
Law
News
]

*
Judge
blocks
Utah’s
latest
attempt
to
age-gate
the
internet.
[AP
News
]

Morning Docket: 09.12.24 – Above the Law

*
Nevada
rejects
NCBE
test
to
forge
new
attorney
licensing
regime
front-loading
requirements
during
law
school
so
“law
graduates
could
be
cleared
to
practice
within
weeks
of
completing
their
studies.”
[Reuters]

*
Judge
settles
suit
with
law
firm
that
threatened
to
release
nude
photos.
[ABA
Journal
]

*
A&O
Shearman
blasted
by
senior
attorneys
over
shock
office
closure.
[Law.com
International
]

*
Train
CEO
fired
after
taking
a
break
from
causing
labor
disputes
and
derailments
to
have
an
affair
with
the
general
counsel.
[CNN]

*
Former
Biglaw
tech
staffer
caught
selling
firm
laptops.
How
much
do
6-year-old
Dells
go
for
anyway?
[LegalCheek]

*
Latest
post-Chevron
casualty:
mental
health.
[Bloomberg
Law
News
]

*
Judge
blocks
Utah’s
latest
attempt
to
age-gate
the
internet.
[AP
News
]

After Debate Shitshow, Trump’s Media Allies Self-Soothe With Fantasies Of Locking Up ABC – Above the Law

Donald
Trump
won
the
debate.
Just
ask
him,
he’ll
tell
you!
Or
don’t
ask
him,
he’ll
tell
you
anyway.

Here
on
Planet
Earth


not
so
much
.
Trump
may
yet
win
the
election,
but
it
probably
won’t
be
because
67
million
people
watched
him
get
baited
into
shouting
racist
lies
about
immigrants
eating
cats
after
Vice
President
Harris
needled
him
about
crowd
size.
And
according
to
Republican
pollster
Frank
Luntz,
he
probably
lost
the
election
by
ranting
like
a
meme-addled
lunatic.

“I’m
trying
to
decide
if
I
want
to
go
on
record,
and
the
answer
is
yes,”
Luntz

admitted

dejectedly
to
Piers
Morgan.
“I
think
that
he
loses
because
of
this
debate
performance.”

The
once
and Godforbid
future
two-bit
fascist
responded
in
his
typical
fashion:
He
made
threats.

“ABC
took
a
big
hit
last
night.
I
mean,
to
be
honest,
they’re
a
news
organization,”
he

babbled

to
his
emotional
support
team
at
Fox
and
Friends.
“They
have
to
be
licensed
to
do
it.
They
ought
to
take
away
their
license
for
the
way
they
did
that.”

And
right
on
cue,
his
pals
at
The
Federalist
swoop
in
to
smear
lipstick
on
the
authoritarian
pig.

The
linked

article

is
by
the
outlet’s
election
correspondent
Beth
Brelje.
Brelje
is
not
a
lawyer,
but
she
did
spend
three
years
at
the
Epoch
Times,
so
she
knows
a
thing
or
two
about

pay-for-play
media
.

In
Brelje’s
math,
if
you
value
each
30-second
segment
of
the
debate
as
an
ad
worth
$225,000,
then
the
90-minute
debate
was
worth
$40.5
million
to
the
Harris
campaign.

“The
Federal
Election
Commission
(FEC)
might
consider
it
an
in-kind
contribution
,’
which
is
a
non-monetary
contribution
to
a
campaign,”
the
opinion
journalist
speculates,
without
any
apparent
irony.

“The
FEC
could
consider
the
debate
a
coordinated
communication
,’
which
can
be
a
type
of
in-kind
donation
that
is
made
in
consultation
with
the
candidate,”
she
natters
on
conspiratorially.
“We
know
both
campaigns
spoke
with
ABC
to
arrange
the
debate,
so
the
communication
lines
were
open
for
such
an
arrangement.”

“Either
way,
$40.5
million
far
exceeds
contribution
limits.
Plus,
corporations
are
barred
from
making
such
contributions,”
she
asserts
confidently,
unburdened
by
what
has
been,
or
input
from
an
actual
election
lawyer
who
might
contradict
her
crackerjack
Google
skills.

She
also
taps
out
some
nonsense
about
the
FCC,
mischaracterizing
a

regulation

governing
ad
sales
and
local
media
providing
free
airtime
to
one
candidate,
so
that
she
can
pretend
ABC
is
in
violation
of
the
law.
Because
a
debate
where
one
candidate

speaks

for
43
minutes,
and
the
other
speaks
for
37
is
somehow

unfair

to
the
guy
who
talked
more.

“There
are
some
exceptions
for
certain
types
of
news
programming,
including
debates,”
she
concedes,
in
a
token
nod
to

reality
,
before
reverting
to
her
preferred
fantasy
narrative.
“But
this
was
a
DINO

a
debate
in
name
only.”

Because
it’s
fun
to
say
stupid
things
on
the
internet.

As
of
today,
the
FEC
and
FCC
are
not
engaged
in
political
persecutions
because
journalists
factcheck
a
political
candidate
who
lies
about
Democrats
murdering
newborns
and
immigrants
eating
pets.
But
Trump
has
promised
to
do
exactly
that
if
he
gets
back
into
power,
so…
perhaps
Ms.
Brelje
will
one
day
get
her
wish.





Liz
Dye
 lives
in
Baltimore
where
she
produces
the
Law
and
Chaos substack and podcast.

After Debate Shitshow, Trump’s Media Allies Self-Soothe With Fantasies Of Locking Up ABC – Above the Law

Donald
Trump
won
the
debate.
Just
ask
him,
he’ll
tell
you!
Or
don’t
ask
him,
he’ll
tell
you
anyway.

Here
on
Planet
Earth


not
so
much
.
Trump
may
yet
win
the
election,
but
it
probably
won’t
be
because
67
million
people
watched
him
get
baited
into
shouting
racist
lies
about
immigrants
eating
cats
after
Vice
President
Harris
needled
him
about
crowd
size.
And
according
to
Republican
pollster
Frank
Luntz,
he
probably
lost
the
election
by
ranting
like
a
meme-addled
lunatic.

“I’m
trying
to
decide
if
I
want
to
go
on
record,
and
the
answer
is
yes,”
Luntz

admitted

dejectedly
to
Piers
Morgan.
“I
think
that
he
loses
because
of
this
debate
performance.”

The
once
and Godforbid
future
two-bit
fascist
responded
in
his
typical
fashion:
He
made
threats.

“ABC
took
a
big
hit
last
night.
I
mean,
to
be
honest,
they’re
a
news
organization,”
he

babbled

to
his
emotional
support
team
at
Fox
and
Friends.
“They
have
to
be
licensed
to
do
it.
They
ought
to
take
away
their
license
for
the
way
they
did
that.”

And
right
on
cue,
his
pals
at
The
Federalist
swoop
in
to
smear
lipstick
on
the
authoritarian
pig.

The
linked

article

is
by
the
outlet’s
election
correspondent
Beth
Brelje.
Brelje
is
not
a
lawyer,
but
she
did
spend
three
years
at
the
Epoch
Times,
so
she
knows
a
thing
or
two
about

pay-for-play
media
.

In
Brelje’s
math,
if
you
value
each
30-second
segment
of
the
debate
as
an
ad
worth
$225,000,
then
the
90-minute
debate
was
worth
$40.5
million
to
the
Harris
campaign.

“The
Federal
Election
Commission
(FEC)
might
consider
it
an
in-kind
contribution
,’
which
is
a
non-monetary
contribution
to
a
campaign,”
the
opinion
journalist
speculates,
without
any
apparent
irony.

“The
FEC
could
consider
the
debate
a
coordinated
communication
,’
which
can
be
a
type
of
in-kind
donation
that
is
made
in
consultation
with
the
candidate,”
she
natters
on
conspiratorially.
“We
know
both
campaigns
spoke
with
ABC
to
arrange
the
debate,
so
the
communication
lines
were
open
for
such
an
arrangement.”

“Either
way,
$40.5
million
far
exceeds
contribution
limits.
Plus,
corporations
are
barred
from
making
such
contributions,”
she
asserts
confidently,
unburdened
by
what
has
been,
or
input
from
an
actual
election
lawyer
who
might
contradict
her
crackerjack
Google
skills.

She
also
taps
out
some
nonsense
about
the
FCC,
mischaracterizing
a

regulation

governing
ad
sales
and
local
media
providing
free
airtime
to
one
candidate,
so
that
she
can
pretend
ABC
is
in
violation
of
the
law.
Because
a
debate
where
one
candidate

speaks

for
43
minutes,
and
the
other
speaks
for
37
is
somehow

unfair

to
the
guy
who
talked
more.

“There
are
some
exceptions
for
certain
types
of
news
programming,
including
debates,”
she
concedes,
in
a
token
nod
to

reality
,
before
reverting
to
her
preferred
fantasy
narrative.
“But
this
was
a
DINO

a
debate
in
name
only.”

Because
it’s
fun
to
say
stupid
things
on
the
internet.

As
of
today,
the
FEC
and
FCC
are
not
engaged
in
political
persecutions
because
journalists
factcheck
a
political
candidate
who
lies
about
Democrats
murdering
newborns
and
immigrants
eating
pets.
But
Trump
has
promised
to
do
exactly
that
if
he
gets
back
into
power,
so…
perhaps
Ms.
Brelje
will
one
day
get
her
wish.





Liz
Dye
 lives
in
Baltimore
where
she
produces
the
Law
and
Chaos substack and podcast.

After Debate Shitshow, Trump’s Media Allies Self-Soothe With Fantasies Of Locking Up ABC – Above the Law

Donald
Trump
won
the
debate.
Just
ask
him,
he’ll
tell
you!
Or
don’t
ask
him,
he’ll
tell
you
anyway.

Here
on
Planet
Earth


not
so
much
.
Trump
may
yet
win
the
election,
but
it
probably
won’t
be
because
67
million
people
watched
him
get
baited
into
shouting
racist
lies
about
immigrants
eating
cats
after
Vice
President
Harris
needled
him
about
crowd
size.
And
according
to
Republican
pollster
Frank
Luntz,
he
probably
lost
the
election
by
ranting
like
a
meme-addled
lunatic.

“I’m
trying
to
decide
if
I
want
to
go
on
record,
and
the
answer
is
yes,”
Luntz

admitted

dejectedly
to
Piers
Morgan.
“I
think
that
he
loses
because
of
this
debate
performance.”

The
once
and Godforbid
future
two-bit
fascist
responded
in
his
typical
fashion:
He
made
threats.

“ABC
took
a
big
hit
last
night.
I
mean,
to
be
honest,
they’re
a
news
organization,”
he

babbled

to
his
emotional
support
team
at
Fox
and
Friends.
“They
have
to
be
licensed
to
do
it.
They
ought
to
take
away
their
license
for
the
way
they
did
that.”

And
right
on
cue,
his
pals
at
The
Federalist
swoop
in
to
smear
lipstick
on
the
authoritarian
pig.

The
linked

article

is
by
the
outlet’s
election
correspondent
Beth
Brelje.
Brelje
is
not
a
lawyer,
but
she
did
spend
three
years
at
the
Epoch
Times,
so
she
knows
a
thing
or
two
about

pay-for-play
media
.

In
Brelje’s
math,
if
you
value
each
30-second
segment
of
the
debate
as
an
ad
worth
$225,000,
then
the
90-minute
debate
was
worth
$40.5
million
to
the
Harris
campaign.

“The
Federal
Election
Commission
(FEC)
might
consider
it
an
in-kind
contribution
,’
which
is
a
non-monetary
contribution
to
a
campaign,”
the
opinion
journalist
speculates,
without
any
apparent
irony.

“The
FEC
could
consider
the
debate
a
coordinated
communication
,’
which
can
be
a
type
of
in-kind
donation
that
is
made
in
consultation
with
the
candidate,”
she
natters
on
conspiratorially.
“We
know
both
campaigns
spoke
with
ABC
to
arrange
the
debate,
so
the
communication
lines
were
open
for
such
an
arrangement.”

“Either
way,
$40.5
million
far
exceeds
contribution
limits.
Plus,
corporations
are
barred
from
making
such
contributions,”
she
asserts
confidently,
unburdened
by
what
has
been,
or
input
from
an
actual
election
lawyer
who
might
contradict
her
crackerjack
Google
skills.

She
also
taps
out
some
nonsense
about
the
FCC,
mischaracterizing
a

regulation

governing
ad
sales
and
local
media
providing
free
airtime
to
one
candidate,
so
that
she
can
pretend
ABC
is
in
violation
of
the
law.
Because
a
debate
where
one
candidate

speaks

for
43
minutes,
and
the
other
speaks
for
37
is
somehow

unfair

to
the
guy
who
talked
more.

“There
are
some
exceptions
for
certain
types
of
news
programming,
including
debates,”
she
concedes,
in
a
token
nod
to

reality
,
before
reverting
to
her
preferred
fantasy
narrative.
“But
this
was
a
DINO

a
debate
in
name
only.”

Because
it’s
fun
to
say
stupid
things
on
the
internet.

As
of
today,
the
FEC
and
FCC
are
not
engaged
in
political
persecutions
because
journalists
factcheck
a
political
candidate
who
lies
about
Democrats
murdering
newborns
and
immigrants
eating
pets.
But
Trump
has
promised
to
do
exactly
that
if
he
gets
back
into
power,
so…
perhaps
Ms.
Brelje
will
one
day
get
her
wish.





Liz
Dye
 lives
in
Baltimore
where
she
produces
the
Law
and
Chaos substack and podcast.

Morning Docket: 09.12.24 – Above the Law

*
Nevada
rejects
NCBE
test
to
forge
new
attorney
licensing
regime
front-loading
requirements
during
law
school
so
“law
graduates
could
be
cleared
to
practice
within
weeks
of
completing
their
studies.”
[Reuters]

*
Judge
settles
suit
with
law
firm
that
threatened
to
release
nude
photos.
[ABA
Journal
]

*
A&O
Shearman
blasted
by
senior
attorneys
over
shock
office
closure.
[Law.com
International
]

*
Train
CEO
fired
after
taking
a
break
from
causing
labor
disputes
and
derailments
to
have
an
affair
with
the
general
counsel.
[CNN]

*
Former
Biglaw
tech
staffer
caught
selling
firm
laptops.
How
much
do
6-year-old
Dells
go
for
anyway?
[LegalCheek]

*
Latest
post-Chevron
casualty:
mental
health.
[Bloomberg
Law
News
]

*
Judge
blocks
Utah’s
latest
attempt
to
age-gate
the
internet.
[AP
News
]