Elon Musk Was Behind Effort To Gaslight Americans Into Believing Donald Trump Supports Reproductive Rights – Above the Law

(Photo
by
Apu
Gomes/Getty
Images)

In
the
waning
days
of
the
2024
presidential
election,

a
curious
political
action
committee
,
named
after
the
late
Supreme
Court
justice
Ruth
Bader
Ginsburg,
ran
ads
in
support
of
Donald
Trump,
and,
bizarrely,
claimed
that
RBG
and
Trump
were
of
“one
mind”
on
abortion
rights.
Of
course,
that’s
far
from
accurate.
The
PAC
misconstrued
Trump’s
position
on
reproductive
freedom,
twisting
the
Trump
assertion
that
he
didn’t
support
a
“federal
abortion
ban,”
and
willfully
ignoring
the

other
words

his
campaign
used
to
amount
to
the
same
thing.
To
say
nothing
of
the
Project
2025

plan
to
use
the
Comstock
Act
of
1973

to
severely
limit
access
to
abortion
care
in
this
country.

The
effort
to
conflate
RBG
and
Trump’s
records
on
reproductive
rights
was
derided
as
“nothing
short
of
appalling”
by

RBG’s
granddaughter
,
Clara
Spera.
A
sentiment
shared
by
pretty
much
everyone
horrified
by
the
Supreme
Court’s

overturning
the
right
to
reproductive
freedom
,
ushering
in
a
new
American
era
of

increased
infant
deaths

and
a
spike
in

maternal
mortality
rates
.

The
RBG
PAC
was
created
right
at
the
FEC
deadline
for
the
election
cycle,
with
$20
million
in
secret
donations.
But
now
we
know
who
has
the
deep
pockets
behind
the
misleading
message.


It’s
Elon
Musk
,
because
of
course
it
is.

The
sum
he
spent
on
the
RBG
PAC
was
just
a
drop
in
the
bucket
of
the
total
amount
Musk
spent
to
back
Trump.
All
in,

Musk
threw
down
$250
million

in
support
of
Trump.
No
wonder
he’s
got
a

fancy
new
title

in
the
Trump
administration.


Earlier:


Republicans
Are
Just
Lying
About
Ruth
Bader
Ginsburg
For
Credibility
In
Upcoming
Election




Kathryn Rubino HeadshotKathryn
Rubino
is
a
Senior
Editor
at
Above
the
Law,
host
of

The
Jabot
podcast
,
and
co-host
of

Thinking
Like
A
Lawyer
.
AtL
tipsters
are
the
best,
so
please
connect
with
her.
Feel
free
to
email

her

with
any
tips,
questions,
or
comments
and
follow
her
on
Twitter

@Kathryn1
 or
Mastodon

@[email protected].

Elon Musk Was Behind Effort To Gaslight Americans Into Believing Donald Trump Supports Reproductive Rights – Above the Law

(Photo
by
Apu
Gomes/Getty
Images)

In
the
waning
days
of
the
2024
presidential
election,

a
curious
political
action
committee
,
named
after
the
late
Supreme
Court
justice
Ruth
Bader
Ginsburg,
ran
ads
in
support
of
Donald
Trump,
and,
bizarrely,
claimed
that
RBG
and
Trump
were
of
“one
mind”
on
abortion
rights.
Of
course,
that’s
far
from
accurate.
The
PAC
misconstrued
Trump’s
position
on
reproductive
freedom,
twisting
the
Trump
assertion
that
he
didn’t
support
a
“federal
abortion
ban,”
and
willfully
ignoring
the

other
words

his
campaign
used
to
amount
to
the
same
thing.
To
say
nothing
of
the
Project
2025

plan
to
use
the
Comstock
Act
of
1973

to
severely
limit
access
to
abortion
care
in
this
country.

The
effort
to
conflate
RBG
and
Trump’s
records
on
reproductive
rights
was
derided
as
“nothing
short
of
appalling”
by

RBG’s
granddaughter
,
Clara
Spera.
A
sentiment
shared
by
pretty
much
everyone
horrified
by
the
Supreme
Court’s

overturning
the
right
to
reproductive
freedom
,
ushering
in
a
new
American
era
of

increased
infant
deaths

and
a
spike
in

maternal
mortality
rates
.

The
RBG
PAC
was
created
right
at
the
FEC
deadline
for
the
election
cycle,
with
$20
million
in
secret
donations.
But
now
we
know
who
has
the
deep
pockets
behind
the
misleading
message.


It’s
Elon
Musk
,
because
of
course
it
is.

The
sum
he
spent
on
the
RBG
PAC
was
just
a
drop
in
the
bucket
of
the
total
amount
Musk
spent
to
back
Trump.
All
in,

Musk
threw
down
$250
million

in
support
of
Trump.
No
wonder
he’s
got
a

fancy
new
title

in
the
Trump
administration.


Earlier:


Republicans
Are
Just
Lying
About
Ruth
Bader
Ginsburg
For
Credibility
In
Upcoming
Election




Kathryn Rubino HeadshotKathryn
Rubino
is
a
Senior
Editor
at
Above
the
Law,
host
of

The
Jabot
podcast
,
and
co-host
of

Thinking
Like
A
Lawyer
.
AtL
tipsters
are
the
best,
so
please
connect
with
her.
Feel
free
to
email

her

with
any
tips,
questions,
or
comments
and
follow
her
on
Twitter

@Kathryn1
 or
Mastodon

@[email protected].

Elon Musk Was Behind Effort To Gaslight Americans Into Believing Donald Trump Supports Reproductive Rights – Above the Law

(Photo
by
Apu
Gomes/Getty
Images)

In
the
waning
days
of
the
2024
presidential
election,

a
curious
political
action
committee
,
named
after
the
late
Supreme
Court
justice
Ruth
Bader
Ginsburg,
ran
ads
in
support
of
Donald
Trump,
and,
bizarrely,
claimed
that
RBG
and
Trump
were
of
“one
mind”
on
abortion
rights.
Of
course,
that’s
far
from
accurate.
The
PAC
misconstrued
Trump’s
position
on
reproductive
freedom,
twisting
the
Trump
assertion
that
he
didn’t
support
a
“federal
abortion
ban,”
and
willfully
ignoring
the

other
words

his
campaign
used
to
amount
to
the
same
thing.
To
say
nothing
of
the
Project
2025

plan
to
use
the
Comstock
Act
of
1973

to
severely
limit
access
to
abortion
care
in
this
country.

The
effort
to
conflate
RBG
and
Trump’s
records
on
reproductive
rights
was
derided
as
“nothing
short
of
appalling”
by

RBG’s
granddaughter
,
Clara
Spera.
A
sentiment
shared
by
pretty
much
everyone
horrified
by
the
Supreme
Court’s

overturning
the
right
to
reproductive
freedom
,
ushering
in
a
new
American
era
of

increased
infant
deaths

and
a
spike
in

maternal
mortality
rates
.

The
RBG
PAC
was
created
right
at
the
FEC
deadline
for
the
election
cycle,
with
$20
million
in
secret
donations.
But
now
we
know
who
has
the
deep
pockets
behind
the
misleading
message.


It’s
Elon
Musk
,
because
of
course
it
is.

The
sum
he
spent
on
the
RBG
PAC
was
just
a
drop
in
the
bucket
of
the
total
amount
Musk
spent
to
back
Trump.
All
in,

Musk
threw
down
$250
million

in
support
of
Trump.
No
wonder
he’s
got
a

fancy
new
title

in
the
Trump
administration.


Earlier:


Republicans
Are
Just
Lying
About
Ruth
Bader
Ginsburg
For
Credibility
In
Upcoming
Election




Kathryn Rubino HeadshotKathryn
Rubino
is
a
Senior
Editor
at
Above
the
Law,
host
of

The
Jabot
podcast
,
and
co-host
of

Thinking
Like
A
Lawyer
.
AtL
tipsters
are
the
best,
so
please
connect
with
her.
Feel
free
to
email

her

with
any
tips,
questions,
or
comments
and
follow
her
on
Twitter

@Kathryn1
 or
Mastodon

@[email protected].

Above The Law’s 16th Annual Holiday Card Contest – Above the Law

It’s
the
most
wonderful
time
of
the
year!
With
Biglaw
bonus
season
already
well
underway

thanks
to
Milbank,
we’re
talking

year-end
bonuses

and

special
bonuses
,
too

the
holiday
season
is
already
off
to
a
great
start.
Law
firm
holiday
parties
will
certainly
get
our
readers
feeling
festive,
but
all
of
the
celebrations
and
hefty
paychecks
pale
in
comparison
to
what’s
about
to
get
underway:
Above
the
Law’s
sixteenth
annual
holiday
card
contest.
We’ve
already
received
several
emails
asking
about
when
this
year’s
contest
would
start.
The
answer:
It
starts
today.

We
are
a
legal
website,
so
of
course
there
are
some
rules
to
follow:

1.
Because
we
are
committed
to
the
environment
here
at
Breaking
Media,
we
will
consider


ONLY
E-CARDS
.
Please
don’t
send
us
paper
holiday
cards
via
snail
mail
this
year

the
Above
the
Law
editorial
team
hasn’t
been
in
our
physical
office
much
since
March
2020.

2.
To
submit
an
e-card,
please
email
either
a
link
to
the
card
or
the
card
itself
(as
an
attachment)

but
note
that


WE
PREFER
LINKS
,
if
available

to


[email protected]
,
subject
line:
“Holiday
Card
Contest.”
The
subject
line
is
very
important
because
it’s
how
we
will
comb
through
our
inbox
to
collect
the
entries
when
picking
finalists.
If
you
don’t
use
the
correct
subject
line,
expect
a
lump
of
coal
in
your
stocking.

3.
Please
limit
submissions
to
holiday
/
Christmas
cards
that
you
view
as


WORTHY
CONTENDERS
.
We’re
looking
for
cards
that
are
unusually
clever,
funny,
or
cool;
we’re
not
interested
in
cards
that
are
safe
or
boring
(e.g.,
a
beautiful
winter
landscape,
a
“Happy
Holidays
2024,”
and
the
law
firm
name).
We’re
seeking
cards
with
some
attitude,
with
that
extra

je
ne
sais
quoi
.
If
you
send
us
a
banal
card,
don’t
be
surprised
if
we
make
fun
of
it.

4.
In
your
email,
please
include
a


BRIEF
EXPLANATION

of
why
this
card
is
compelling

an
explanation
that
we


MIGHT
QUOTE
FROM

if
your
nominee
makes
the
finals
(if
you
want
to
be
anonymous,
let
us
know).
If
you
can’t
offer
an
explanation,
please
rethink
whether
the
card
is
a
worthy
contender
(see
rule
#3,
supra).

5.
The
deadline
for
submissions
is
about
two
weeks
away:

FRIDAY,
DECEMBER
13,
at
11:59
p.m.

(New
York
time).
No
exceptions.
If
you’re
reading
this
post
after
the
deadline,
then
you
don’t
read
Above
the
Law
frequently
enough.

We
look
forward
to
seeing

your
submissions
.
Thank
you,
and
happy
holidays!



Staci ZaretskyStaci
Zaretsky
 is
a
senior
editor
at
Above
the
Law,
where
she’s
worked
since
2011.
She’d
love
to
hear
from
you,
so
please
feel
free
to

email

her
with
any
tips,
questions,
comments,
or
critiques.
You
can
follow
her
on

X/Twitter

and

Threads

or
connect
with
her
on

LinkedIn
.

Law Firms Should Pay Higher Bonuses When Associates Are Close To Thresholds – Above the Law

Many
people
keep
an
eye
on
Above
the
Law
during
the
end
of
the
year
to
see
what
types
of
bonuses
top
law
firms
are
awarding
associates.
Although
many
top
law
firm
award
bonuses
based
on
the
class
year
of
an
associate,
a
number
of
law
firms
distribute
bonuses
based
on
other
factors,
including
the
hours
an
associate
billed
during
the
preceding
year.
Under
such
systems,
associates
usually
pull
long
hours
to
ensure
they
meet
a
given
bonus
threshold
and
earn
a
higher
bonus.
In
many
instances,
it
is
usually
best
if
law
firms
award
associates
a
higher
bonus
even
if
they
just
miss
a
higher
bonus
threshold
since
this
can
boost
morale
and
generate
goodwill
between
associates
and
an
employer.

I
once
worked
for
an
employer
that
offered
output-based
bonuses.
I
really
wanted
to
earn
a
bonus
that
was
based
on
a
given
level
of
output,
and
I
spent
many
long
days
working
hard
at
increasing
my
output
so
that
I
earned
that
particular
bonus.
By
the
end
of
the
bonus
season,
my
rough
calculations
showed
that
I
had
just
made
the
bonus
threshold,
which
was
a
relief,
and
I
looked
forward
to
being
paid
the
higher
bonus.

To
my
surprise,
when
the
official
report
came
back
evaluating
my
work,
it
turned
out
that
I
just
missed
the
bonus
threshold.
This
was
because
some
of
the
work
I
performed
was
not
being
counted
toward
bonus
calculations.
This
was
upsetting
since
the
difference
in
bonus
thresholds
was
massive,
and
I
had
worked
so
hard
trying
to
meet
the
threshold.

In
some
correspondence
to
my
superior,
I
gently
mentioned
that
I
slightly
missed
the
higher
bonus
threshold,
and
that
I
worked
hard
in
order
to
meet
that
given
threshold.
I
also
mentioned
that
I
thought
I
had
satisfied
the
threshold
but
due
to
the
way
that
the
bonuses
were
calculated,
some
of
my
work
would
not
count
toward
determining
if
I
was
owed
a
higher
bonus.
I
did
not
think
my
employer
would
take
any
of
this
into
consideration
when
awarding
my
bonus,
but
I
figured
it
didn’t
hurt
to
try.
Although
the
employer
was
clear
that
bonuses
were
determined
based
on
a
clear
mathematical
formula,
perhaps
it
was
possible
that
extenuating
circumstances
could
impact
the
bonus
determination.

To
my
surprise,
my
employer
decided
to
bump
me
up
to
the
next
bonus
amount
even
though
I
had
just
missed
the
threshold.
The
employer
acknowledged
that
I
was
very
close
to
meeting
the
threshold
and
related
that
some
of
the
calculations
used
when
determining
if
work
counted
toward
the
bonus
were
confusing.
This
was
a
big
deal
for
me,
since
the
differences
between
the
bonus
I
was
entitled
to
based
on
the
lower
threshold
and
the
bonus
I
received
was
massive
and
definitely
impacted
my
bottom
line.

Basing
bonuses
on
clear
mathematical
guidelines
makes
a
lot
of
sense.
This
prevents
people
from
receiving
disparate
bonuses
based
on
how
much
partners
like
an
associate
and
eliminates
ambiguity
about
how
bonuses
are
calculated.
Clear
bonus
thresholds
also
give
associates
an
incentive
to
work
hard
and
increase
output,
which
typically
benefits
the
law
firms
that
employ
them.
However,
law
firms
that
employ
clear-cut
bonus
criteria
should
still
be
flexible
and
award
higher
bonuses
in
situations
such
as
when
an
associate
just
misses
a
threshold
for
a
variety
of
reasons.
The
extra
bonus
amount
will
likely
have
a
small
impact
on
a
law
firm,
but
can
increase
the
morale
of
an
associate
and
tighten
the
connection
an
associate
has
with
an
employer.




Rothman Larger HeadshotJordan
Rothman
is
a
partner
of




The
Rothman
Law
Firm
,
a
full-service
New
York
and
New
Jersey
law
firm.
He
is
also
the
founder
of




Student
Debt
Diaries
,
a
website
discussing
how
he
paid
off
his
student
loans.
You
can
reach
Jordan
through
email
at





[email protected]
.


Bonus Time

Enter
your
email
address
to
sign
up
for
ATL’s

Bonus
&
Salary
Increase
Alerts
.


Boutique Firm Makes It Rain Biglaw Bonus Bucks On Associates – Above the Law

Boutique
firms
continue
to
prove
that
they’re
capable
of
meeting
and
competing
with
Biglaw
in
terms
of
compensation.

The
latest
boutique
to
meet
the
market
in
terms
of
matching
Milbank’s
generous

year-end

and

special

bonuses
is
Glenn
Agre
Bergman
&
Fuentes.
The
litigation
firm
was
founded
in
2021,
and
it’s
offering
Biglaw
bonus
compensation
to
its
hardworking
attorneys
for
the
fourth
year
in
a
row.

Here’s
what
the
bonus
and
salary
scale
looks
like
at
Glenn
Agre:

Glenn Agre Bonus Scale 2024

There’s
even
better
news
for
associates,
because
on
top
of
these
lockstep
bonuses,
they’ll
be
eligible
to
receive
a
“premium”
based
on
“extraordinary
dedication
and/or
performance.”

Congratulations
to
everyone
at
Glenn
Agre!
Associates’
accounts
will
be
flush
with
cash
come
December
20.

(Flip
to
the
next
page
to
read
the
firm’s
bonus
memo
in
full.)

Remember
everyone,
we
depend
on
your
tips
to
stay
on
top
of
compensation
updates,
so
when
your
firm
announces
or
matches,
please
text
us
(646-820-8477)
or email
us
 (subject
line:
“[Firm
Name]
Bonus/Matches”).
Please
include
the
memo
if
available.
You
can
take
a
photo
of
the
memo
and
send
it
via
text
or
email
if
you
don’t
want
to
forward
the
original
PDF
or
Word
file.

And
if
you’d
like
to
sign
up
for
ATL’s
Bonus
Alerts
(which
is
the
alert
list
we
also
use
for
salary
announcements),
please
scroll
down
and
enter
your
email
address
in
the
box
below
this
post.
If
you
previously
signed
up
for
the
bonus
alerts,
you
don’t
need
to
do
anything.
You’ll
receive
an
email
notification
within
minutes
of
each
bonus
announcement
that
we
publish.
Thanks
for
your
help!



Staci ZaretskyStaci
Zaretsky
 is
a
senior
editor
at
Above
the
Law,
where
she’s
worked
since
2011.
She’d
love
to
hear
from
you,
so
please
feel
free
to

email

her
with
any
tips,
questions,
comments,
or
critiques.
You
can
follow
her
on BlueskyX/Twitter,
and Threads, or
connect
with
her
on LinkedIn.


Bonus Time

Enter
your
email
address
to
sign
up
for
ATL’s

Bonus
&
Salary
Increase
Alerts
.


This Boutique Law Firm’s Bonuses Are A Real Knockout For Associates – Above the Law

Boutique
law
firms
are
really
showing
their
financial
prowess
this
bonus
season,
matching
Milbank’s
generous

year-end

and

special

bonuses,
time
and
again.
The
latest
boutique
to
announce
a
Biglaw
bonus
is
Ross
Aronstam
&
Moritz,
a
Delaware
litigation
firm
founded
by
lawyers
from
Wachtell,
Weil,
and
Kellogg
Hansen.
This
small,
specialized
firm
recently
entered
the
ring
to
match
the
latest
round
of
bonuses.

Here’s
what
the
bonus
and
salary
scale
looks
like
at
Ross
Aronstam:

Ross Aronstam Bonus Scale 2024

There
are
no
hours
requirements
for
these
bonuses,
which
will
be
paid
on
December
15.

Congratulations
to
everyone
at
Ross
Aronstam!

(Flip
to
the
next
page
to
read
the
firm’s
bonus
memo
in
full.)

Remember
everyone,
we
depend
on
your
tips
to
stay
on
top
of
compensation
updates,
so
when
your
firm
announces
or
matches,
please
text
us
(646-820-8477)
or email
us
 (subject
line:
“[Firm
Name]
Bonus/Matches”).
Please
include
the
memo
if
available.
You
can
take
a
photo
of
the
memo
and
send
it
via
text
or
email
if
you
don’t
want
to
forward
the
original
PDF
or
Word
file.

And
if
you’d
like
to
sign
up
for
ATL’s
Bonus
Alerts
(which
is
the
alert
list
we
also
use
for
salary
announcements),
please
scroll
down
and
enter
your
email
address
in
the
box
below
this
post.
If
you
previously
signed
up
for
the
bonus
alerts,
you
don’t
need
to
do
anything.
You’ll
receive
an
email
notification
within
minutes
of
each
bonus
announcement
that
we
publish.
Thanks
for
your
help!



Staci ZaretskyStaci
Zaretsky
 is
a
senior
editor
at
Above
the
Law,
where
she’s
worked
since
2011.
She’d
love
to
hear
from
you,
so
please
feel
free
to

email

her
with
any
tips,
questions,
comments,
or
critiques.
You
can
follow
her
on BlueskyX/Twitter,
and Threads, or
connect
with
her
on LinkedIn.


Bonus Time

Enter
your
email
address
to
sign
up
for
ATL’s

Bonus
&
Salary
Increase
Alerts
.


Mass Puppycide Ends Career Of Tennessee Deputy Who Probably Never Should Have Been A Cop – Above the Law

Cops
just
seem to love killing
people’s
pets.
While this
act
 is
often
“justified”
by
(often
ridiculous)
claims
of
“officer
safety,” a
whole
lot
of
killing
 of
people’s
dogs
seems
to
happen
just
because
law
enforcement
officers
have the
means
and
the
opportunity
 to
carry
this
act
out.

Nothing
involving
the
killing
of
people’s
dogs
can
be
considered
anomalous.
The
US
Department
of
Justice pointed
this
out
years
ago
,
albeit
not
officially.
In
2014,
community-oriented-policing
program
head
Laurel
Matthews
stated
that
cops
are
killing
up
to
30
pets a
day,
 something
she
referred
to
as
an
“epidemic.”

If
anyone
wants
to
argue
this
estimate
isn’t
accurate,
they’re
free
to
do
so.
But it
isn’t
difficult
to
believe
 American
law
enforcement
is
capable
of
killing
30
pets
a
day
across
the
nation,
especially
when
there’s
little
reason
for
them not to
shoot
any
animals
they
see
while
inviting
themselves
onto
other
people’s
private
property.

But
most
cops
are
willing
to
limit
themselves
to
one
or
two
killings
per
incident.
Former
Tennessee
law
enforcement
officer
Connor
Brackin,
however,
decided
he
couldn’t
call
an
end
to
this
animal
welfare
visit
until he’d
personally killed all
but
one
the
animals
he
was
supposed
to
be
saving
.
(h/t Reason)


Conner
Brackin,
a
24-year-old
police
deputy
with
the
McNairy
County
Sheriff’s
Office,
was arrested
and
charged
 with
aggravated
animal
cruelty
on
Tuesday
following
an
investigation
by
the
Tennessee
Bureau
of
Investigation.
On
Nov.
4,
Brackin
responded
to
an
“animal
welfare
concern”
in
Bethel
Springs,
a
city
located
around
100
miles
east
of
Memphis.
According
to
the
affidavit,
Brackin
spoke
with
the
person
who
made
the
complaint
about
multiple
dogs
on
the
neighboring
property,
some
in
pens,
some
in
two
different
trailers.
Brackin
released
one
of
the
dogs
from
a
pen
and
then
“loaded
his
service
rifle
and
pistol
and
began
firing
into
the
campers
at
the
dogs.”



He
allegedly
fired
eight
times,
killing
seven
dogs.

That’s
not
insane.
That’s
pyschopathic,
which
is
something
else
altogether.
The
owner
of
the
dogs,
Kevin
Dismuke,
didn’t
know
law
enforcement
was
taking
a
look
at
his
dogs
until after Deputy
Brackin
had
killed
all
but
one
of
them.
He
was
left
to
discover
the
fact
on
his
own
upon
his
return
to
his
trailer,
where
he
was
greeted
by
one
dead
dog
and
then
several
others
in
quick
succession.

The
McNairy
County
Sheriff’s
Office
tried
to
spin
this
a
bit:


The
McNairy
County
Sheriff’s
Office
stated
Brackin
observed
two
dogs
in
“extremely
poor
health”
and
one
was
“already
deceased.”
After
looking
for
the
dogs’
owner,
Brackin
let
a
neighbor
take
one
of
the
dogs
and
said
that
he
had
been
“cleared
to
put
down
the
remaining
animals
safely
by
my
supervisor.”

But
there’s
no
force
behind
these
words,
much
less
any
real
sincerity.
The
Sheriff’s
Office
doesn’t
really
think
Deputy
Brackin’s
actions
were
justified.
Nor
does
it
care
what
the
dogs’
owner
thinks
about
this
impromptu
guns-out
raid
performed
by
the
deputy.

We
already
know
most
law
enforcement
agencies
are
rarely
sincerely
concerned
about
the
misery
their
officers
cause.
But
we
do
know
the
Sheriff’s
Office
didn’t
feel
these
actions
were
justified,
otherwise
it
might
have
stepped
in
to
protect
one
of
its
own before this happened:


On
November
7th,
at
the
request
of
25th
Judicial
District
Attorney
General
Mark
Davidson,
TBI
special
agents
began
investigating
the
incident. 
Agents
subsequently
developed
information
that
on
November
4th,
the
McNairy
County
Sheriff’s
Department
received
an
animal
welfare
concern
call.
 Deputy
Connor
Brackin
(DOB:
07/26/2000)
responded
to
the
residence
in
the
8300
block
of
SR
199
in
Bethel
Springs,
to
check
the
condition
of
the
dogs.
 Bracken
released
one
of
the
dogs
to
the
complainant. 
For
reasons
under
investigation,
he
fired
his
duty
weapon,
shooting
and
killing
seven
dogs
on
the
property.


On
Tuesday,
TBI
agents
obtained
warrants
for
Brackin,
charging
him
with
seven
counts
of
Aggravated
Cruelty
to
Animals
and
eight
counts
of
Reckless
Endangerment. 
Brackin
turned
himself
in
and
was
booked
into
the
McNairy
County
Jail.

If
the
deputy
felt
his
employer
would
have
his
back,
he
never
would
have
turned
himself
in.
If
the
Sheriff’s
Office
thought
Deputy
Brackin
was
worth
keeping
on
staff,
it
would
have
acted
on
his
behalf.
And
it
certainly
wouldn’t
have
accepted
the
24-year-old
officer’s
resignation
if
it
thought
his
actions
were
justified.
The
now-former
deputy
is
on
his
own.
And,
on
top
of
this, he’s
feeling
the
weight
of
his
(extremely
short)
law
enforcement
past
 being
brought
to
bear.


[Brackin]
graduated
from
the
training
academy
in
September
2022.
In
less
than
two
years,
his
personnel
file
shows
an
administrative
summons
with
allegations
from
two
different
shootings.
A
statement
from
a
hearing
in
May
2024
says
Brackin
“did
not
shoot
the
subject
and
was
merely
returning
fire
to
the
area
where
he
observed
a
muzzle
flash
and
the
sound
of
gunfire.”
It
was
recommended
he
undergo
remedial
training.


The
second
incident,
less
than
two
months
later,
ended
with
someone
dead.
The
TBI
said
the
local
district
attorney
called
them
in
to
investigate
the
shooting
from
March
2023.


In
May
2024,
the
end
of
Brackin’s
probationary
period,
“Chief
Corley
found
it
was
in
the
best
interest
of
the
community,
the
City
of
Jackson,
and
the
Jackson
Police
Department
to
not
retain
Officer
Brackin
as
a
police
officer.”
Brackin
resigned
a
day
later.

Getting
canned
less
than
two
years
in
means
someone
is
so
bad
at
being
a
cop
even
cop
shops
won’t
stick
out
their
neck
for
him.
Fortunately
for
bad
cops,
there’s always
another
cop
shop
 willing
to
hire
anyone
to
be
a
cop,
especially
if
they’ve
got
any
amount
of
experience
under
their
belt.

But
two
years
after
this
rescue
from
the
pile
of
law
enforcement
rejects,
Connor
Brackin
is
once
again
jobless.
Unfortunately
for
him,
this
second
separation
from
the
Thin
Blue
Line
was
voluntary
and
comes
coupled
with
multiple
criminal
charges.
Whatever
comes
out
of
this
won’t
keep
Brackin
from
seeking
law
enforcement
options
in
the
future.
But
maybe…
just maybe
it
will
prevent
law
enforcement
agencies
from
hiring
him.


Mass
Puppycide
Ends
Career
Of
Tennessee
Deputy
Who
Probably
Never
Should
Have
Been
A
Cop


More
Law-Related
Stories
From
Techdirt:


Court
Says
There’s
Nothing
Unconstitutional
About
Warrantless
Seizures,
Searches
Of
An
Immigration
Lawyer’s
Phone


DOJ
Investigation
Proves
That
If
A
PD
Isn’t
Known
For
Its
Constant
Rights
Violations,
It’s
Because
It
Hasn’t
Been
Investigated
Yet


FTC
Joins
CFPB
In
Finally
Taking
Aim
At
Data
Brokers
As
Trumpism
Looms

Morning Docket: 12.06.24 – Above the Law

*
Applications
for
law
school
are
up
35
percent
just
in
time
for
these
students
to
compile
massive
loans
before
firms
replace
entry
level
legal
jobs
with
AI.
[ABA
Journal
]

*
A
look
at
John
Morgan’s
personal
injury
practice
empire.
[Forbes]

*
California
bar
examiners
will
consider
participation
in
protests
as
part
of
character
and
fitness
process.
[California
Courts
Newsroom
]

*
After
a
past
retreat
on
reform,
Washington
state
launches
another
pilot
program
to
allow
some
legal
services
to
be
performed
by
trained
non-lawyers.
[Reuters]

*
McKinsey
to
pay
$123
million
over
bribery
scheme,
but
they
hope
to
make
that
back
immediately
by
telling
more

incredibly
gullible
people
that
they’ve
invented
garbage
cans
.
[Law360]

*
Firm
growth
opens
door
to
new
stumbling
blocks,
which
partners
will
notice
after
they
stop
rolling
around
naked
on
a
large
pile
of
cash.
[American
Lawyer
]

*
The
ranking
of
best
law
firm
offices
in
the
UK
won’t
be
out
for
a
while
but
here’s
a
sneak
peak
at
what
the
survey
is
turning
up.
[Roll
on
Friday
]

Watch Sharon Pincott’s elephant documentary online



For
those
of
you
in
Zimbabwe

and
indeed
all
around
Africa
and
the
rest
of
the
world

who
would
like
to
watch
(or
watch
again)
Sharon
Pincott’s
highly
acclaimed
documentary
titled
ALL
THE
PRESIDENT’S
ELEPHANTS
can
now
do
so
freely
on
this
online
link 
— 



https://stirr.com/movies/5831/all-the-president-s-elephants
.
(It
had
been
unavailable
in
some
Regions
on
this
link,
but
this
has
now
been
rectified.)


This
Award-winning
documentary
was
filmed
in
2011
by
the
South
African
production
company
Triosphere,
featuring
Sharon’s
life,
work
and
amazingly
intimate
relationship
with
the
families
of
wild,
free-roaming,
Hwange
elephants
known
as
The
Presidential
Elephants
of
Zimbabwe,
as
well
as
the
Reaffirmation
of
the
Presidential
Decree
initiated
by
Sharon,
and
much
more.
Official
Nominations
for
this
documentary
include

South
African
Film
&
Television
Awards
2013:
Best
TV
Wildlife
Program,
Best
Director,
Best
Editor,
Best
Cinematographer.
Official
Film
Festival
Selections:
Durban
International
2012;
Jozi
South
Africa
2013;
Netherlands
2013;
France
2013.
At
the
Japan
Wildlife
Film
Festival
2013
it
won
OUTSTANDING
CONTRIBUTION
TO
NATURE

with
the
judges
commenting
how
“very
moving”
it
was
“to
see
how
closely
people
and
elephants
can
be
mentally
connected”,
and
expressing
their
respect
and
appreciation
for
Pincott’s
elephant
conservation
work.
It
was
also
a
finalist
at
the
Sichuan
TV
Festival
2013,
China,
for
BEST
NATURE
&
ENVIRONMENT
PROTECTION
AWARD.


ScreenAfrica
described
this
documentary
as
“unforgettable”
and
“touching
and
profound”.
Intrepid
Explorer
magazine
called
it
“riveting”
and
“graphic
and
powerful”.
When
it
screened
on
French
television,
its
name
was
changed
to
THE
ELEPHANT
GUARDIAN
(
LA
GARDIENNE
DES
ÉLÉPHANTS
).
It
also
screened
on
television
in
Hungary,
South
Africa
and
Australia.
In
2016,
it
was
a
finalist
in
the
International
Elephant
Film
Festival,
known
now
as
one
of
the
‘World’s
best
elephant
films’
from
the
previous
9
years

an
event
that
involved
both
the
United
Nations
and
CITES.


Sharon
is
now
back
in
Australia,
needing
to
be
close
to
good
Specialists
and
hospitals
in
order
to
undertake
regular
treatments
to
try
to
keep
her
numerous
(mostly
Autoimmune)
conditions
under
control

as
well
as
2
very
rare
ones,
including
Stiff
Person
Syndrome
(which
singer
Celine
Dion
also
suffers
from)

which
began
to
kick
in
during
2015
after
she
eventually
fled
Zimbabwe.
She
suffers
daily
severe
pain
and
mobility
and
organ
issues
as
a
result
of
these
incurable
and
progressive
conditions.
But
as
Sharon
says,
“there
can
be
no
regrets”,
despite
the
lack
of
high-level
support,
harassment,
apathy
and
envy
that
she
endured
in
Zimbabwe
for
many
years.
She
still
does
what
she
can
for
elephants
remotely
as
her
health
allows,
and
continues
to
use
her
old



www.facebook.com/PresidentialElephantsZim


page. 

Post
published
in:

Business