Businessman files complaint against Harare magistrate for ‘gross bias’

HARARE

A
Harare
businessman
has
filed
a
complaint
against
Harare
magistrate
Lynne
Chinzou
accusing
her
of
“gross
bias”
in
her
handling
of
a
forgery
trial
involving
his
former
employee.

The
businessman,
Skhumbuzo
Manduna
and
his
company,
Andiswe
Phakade
(Pvt)
Ltd
trading
as
AP
Carriers,
had
taken
Elias
Masora,
who
was
a
company
driver,
to
court
accusing
him
of
forging
a
defensive
driving
certificate.

However,
following
trial,
Musora
was
acquitted
with
the
magistrate
citing
insufficient
evidence
to
prove
the
charge
beyond
reasonable
doubt.

Musora,
while
still
employed
by
the
company,
allegedly
got
involved
in
theft
of
1,200
litres
of
diesel
within
a
month
of
his
hiring,
which
prompted
Manduna
to
scrutinise
his
employment
credentials.


The
theft
case
is
pending
at
Mbare
Magistrates’
Court.

Manduna
feels
the
magistrate
did
not
handle
the
forgery
case
well
enough.

“The
above-mentioned
subject
matter
refers
in
terms
of
which
we
are
formally
writing
to
your
office
laying
a
complaint
pertaining
to
the
gross
bias
demonstrated
by
the
magistrate
in
the
manner
she
presided
over
the
matter
S
v
Elias
Masora,”
reads
the
letter,
dated
12
September
2024,
and
addressed
to
the
Chief
Magistrate.

“In
her
judgement,
the
magistrate
contended
that
Elias
Masora
disclosed
to
the
company
that
he
didn’t
have
a
defensive
driving
certificate;
this
assertion
defies
all
logic
because
for
anyone
to
apply
for
a
position
of
truck
driver,
you
ought
to
be
in
possession
of
a
defensive
certificate.

“It
is
inconceivable
that
the
accused
approached
a
company
soliciting
for
a
job,
disclosed
to
the
company
that
he
doesn’t
hold
the
required
documents
for
the
job
and
still
went
on
to
be
hired.

“Truck
driving
is
not
a
specialist
skill
such
that
a
company
can
risk
to
forego
any
requirement
as
far
as
recruitment
of
a
truck
driver
is
concerned.

“It
is
evident
here
that
the
magistrate
ought
to
have
applied
her
mind.”

The
State’s
case
relied
on
a
single
witness,
the
complainant,
who
testified
that
Masora
had
furnished
a
fake
document
during
the
hiring
process.

However,
the
court
noted
that
neither
the
original
defensive
certificate
nor
the
request
letter
to
the
Traffic
Safety
Council
of
Zimbabwe
was
tendered
as
part
of
the
evidence.

Furthermore,
the
court
questioned
the
authenticity
of
a
letter
from
the
Traffic
Safety
Council
of
Zimbabwe,
dated
March
20,
2024,
which
had
a
date
stamp
of
March
19,
2024.

It
stated
that
Masora
‘s
defensive
driving
certificate
had
expired
on
24
February
2019.

The
court
also
noted
that
the
key
witness,
the
Human
Resources
Manager
who
hired
Masora,
was
not
called
to
testify.

Manduna
said
magistrate
Chinzou
demonstrated
bias
in
her
judgment.

In
her
ruling,
Chinzou
queried
the
police’s
decision
to
write
to
the
Traffic
Safety
Council
of
Zimbabwe,
which
Manduna
argues
was
within
the
police’s
discretionary
powers.

He
further
contends
that
she
expressed
doubts
about
the
authenticity
of
a
letter
from
the
Traffic
Safety
Council
of
Zimbabwe
without
subpoenaing
a
witness
to
clarify.

Manduna
also
raised
concerns
about
the
delay
in
accessing
the
court
record
and
the
circumstances
under
which
it
was
finally
obtained
citing
that
the
record
took
two
months
in
the
magistrate
office
before
it
could
be
accessed.

He
alleges
Magistrate
Chinzou
was
“clutching
at
straws”
to
secure
an
acquittal
for
Masora
and
urges
consideration
of
the
complaint.

Mandatory radio licence Bill goes to parliament after cabinet approval

HARARE

Ministers
on
Tuesday
affirmed
the
Broadcasting
Services
Amendment
Bill
under
which
motorists
will
be
forced
to
buy
radio
licences
before
paying
their
road
tax
and
insuring
their
vehicles.

The
plan
is
to
raise
up
to
US$74
million
for
the
Zimbabwe
Broadcasting
Corporation
annually.

Information
minister
Jenfan
Muswere
told
journalists
after
a
cabinet
meeting:
“The
cabinet
considered
and
adopted
the
Broadcasting
Services
Amendment
Bill,
presented
by
Justice,
Legal
and
Parliamentary
Affairs
Minister
Ziyambi
Ziyambi
as
chairman
of
the
cabinet
committee
on
lislation.

“The
major
objective
of
the
Broadcasting
Services
Amendment
Bill
is
to
align
the
Broadcasting
Services
Act
[Chapter
12:06]
with
the
constitution
and
also
with
the
Public
Entities
Corporate
Governance
Act.


“The
enactment
of
the
legislation
will
amend
several
sections
of
the
Broadcasting
Services
Act
[Chapter
12:06].
Of
special
mention
is
the
amendment
of
section
2A
of
the
principal
Act
on
the
role
of
the
Broadcasting
Services
of
Zimbabwe
which
is
to
regulate
and
manage
the
broadcasting
services
bands
for
sustenance
rather
than
control
of
broadcasting
service
bands.

“The
Bill
will
also
provide
a
new
provision,
which
will
prohibit
the
Zimbabwe
National
Road
Administration
and
every
motor
insurance
cover
to
sell
a
motor
vehicle
licence
and
motor
insurance
policy
respectively
to
individuals
without
the
Zimbabwe
Broadcasting
Corporation
current
radio
licence
or
an
exemption
certificate
from
the
Zimbabwe
Broadcasting
Corporation,
unless
the
vehicle
to
be
insured
is
not
equipped
with
a
radio
signal
receiver.”

The
Bill,
which
is
expected
to
sail
through
the
National
Assembly
and
Senate
where
Zanu
PF
enjoys
a
sweeping
majority,
also
mandates
the
ZBC
to
broadcast
75
percent
local
content.

Critics
say
the
ZBC
is
a
propaganda
arm
of
Zanu
PF
and
has
failed
in
its
mandate
to
serve
as
a
truly
public
broadcaster.

“It’s
well
and
good
that
they
want
to
support
ZBC,
but
where
is
the
corresponding
service
charter
for
ZBC
spelling
out
its
responsibilities
so
that
we
can
hold
it
accountable?
It
can’t
be
licence
fees
without
accountability,”
media
rights
activist
Rashweat
Mukundu
said.

Zimbabwe
has
1.2
million
registered
vehicles
but
only
800,000
motorists
pay
their
licences,
according
to
the
Zimbabwe
National
Roads
Agency
(ZINARA).

With
vehicle
radio
licences
pegged
at
US$23
per
quarter
and
US$92
per
year,
this
translates
to
a
minimum
US$73.6
million
in
potential
revenue
for
ZBC
per
year
which
would
rise
to
US$110
million
if
every
registered
vehicle
paid.

An ancient African tree is providing a new ‘superfood’ but local harvesters are barely surviving


Loveness
Bhitoni

Since
childhood,
Loveness
Bhitoni
has
collected
fruit
from
the
gigantic
baobab
trees
surrounding
her
homestead
in Zimbabwe to
add
variety
to
the
family’s
staple
corn
and
millet
diet.
The
50-year-old
Bhitoni
never
saw
them
as
a
source
of
cash,
until
now.



Climate
change-induced
droughts
 have
decimated
her
crops.
Meanwhile,
the
world
has
a
growing
appetite
for
the
fruit
of
the
drought-resistant
baobab
as
a
natural
health
food.

Bhitoni
wakes
before
dawn
to
go
foraging
for
baobab
fruit,
sometimes
walking
barefoot
though
hot,
thorny
landscapes
with
the
risk
of
wildlife
attacks.
She
gathers
sacks
of
the
hard-shelled
fruit
from
the
ancient
trees
and
sells
them
on
to
industrial
food
processors
or
individual
buyers
from
the
city.

The
baobab
trade,
which
took
root
in
her
area
in
2018,
would
previously
supplement
things
like
children’s
school
fees
and
clothing
for
locals
of
the
small
town
of
Kotwa
in
northeastern
Zimbabwe.
Now,
it’s
a
matter
of
survival
following the
latest
devastating
drought
 in
southern
Africa,
worsened
by
the
El
Niño
weather
phenomenon.


Loveness
Bhitoni

“We
are
only
able
to
buy
corn
and
salt,”
Bhitoni
said
after
a
long
day’s
harvest.
“Cooking
oil
is
a
luxury
because
the
money
is
simply
not
enough.
Sometimes
I
spend
a
month
without
buying
a
bar
of
soap.
I
can’t
even
talk
of
school
fees
or
children’s
clothes.”

The
global
market
for
baobab
products
has
spiked,
turning
rural
African
areas
with
an
abundance
of
the
trees
into
source
markets.
The
trees,
known
for
surviving
even
under
severe
conditions
like
drought
or
fire,
need
more
than
20
years
to
start
producing
fruit
and
aren’t
cultivated
but
foraged.

Tens
of
thousands
of
rural
people
like
Bhitoni
have
emerged
to
feed
the
need.
The
African
Baobab
Alliance,
with
members
across
the
continent’s
baobab
producing
countries,
projects
that
more
than
1
million
rural
African
women
could
reap
economic
benefits
from
the
fruit,
which
remains
fresh
for
long
periods
because
of
its
thick
shell.

The
alliance’s
members
train
locals
on
food
safety.
They
also
encourage
people
to
collect
the
fruit,
which
can
grow
to
8
inches
(20
centimeters)
wide
and
21
inches
(53
centimeters)
long,
from
the
ground
rather
than
the
hazardous
work
of
climbing
the
enormous,
thick-trunked
trees.
Many,
especially
men,
still
do,
however.

Native
to
the
African
continent,
the
baobab
is
known
as
the
“tree
of
life”
for
its
resilience
and
is
found
from
South
Africa
to
Kenya
to
Sudan
and
Senegal.
Zimbabwe
has
about
5
million
of
the
trees,
according
to
Zimtrade,
a
government
export
agency.

But
the
baobab’s
health
benefits
long
went
unnoticed
elsewhere.

Gus
Le
Breton,
a
pioneer
of
the
industry,
remembers
the
early
days.

“Baobab
did
not
develop
into
a
globally
traded
and
known
superfood
by
accident,”
said
Le
Breton,
recalling
years
of
regulatory,
safety
and
toxicology
testing
to
convince
authorities
in
the
European
Union
and
United
States
to
approve
it.

“It
was
ridiculous
because
the
baobab
fruit
has
been
consumed
in
Africa
safely
for
thousands
and
thousands
of
years,”
said
Le
Breton,
an
ethnobotanist
specializing
in
African
plants
used
for
food
and
medicine.

Studies
have
shown
that
the
baobab
fruit
has
several
health
benefits
as
an
antioxidant,
and
a
source
of
vitamin
C
and
essential
minerals
such
as
zinc,
potassium
and
magnesium.

The
U.S.
legalized
the
import
of
baobab
powder
as
a
food
and
beverage
ingredient
in
2009,
a
year
after
the
EU.
But
getting
foreign
taste
buds
to
accept
the
sharp,
tart-like
taste
took
repeated
trips
to
Western
and
Asian
countries.

“No
one
had
ever
heard
of
it,
they
didn’t
know
how
to
pronounce
its
name.
It
took
us
a
long
time,”
Le
Breton
said.
The
tree
is
pronounced
BAY-uh-bab.

Together
with
China,
the
U.S.
and
Europe
now
account
for
baobab
powder’s
biggest
markets.
The
Dutch
government’s
Center
for
the
Promotion
of
Imports
says
the
global
market
could
reach
$10
billion
by
2027.
Le
Breton
says
his
association
projects
a
200%
growth
in
global
demand
between
2025
and
2030,
and
is
also
looking
at
increasing
consumption
among
Africa’s
increasingly
health-conscious
urbanites.

Companies
such
as
Coca-Cola
and
Pepsi
have
opened
product
lines
promoting
baobab
ingredients.
In
Europe,
the
powder
is
hyped
by
some
as
having
“real
star
qualities”
and
is
used
to
flavor
beverages,
cereals,
yogurt,
snack
bars
and
other
items.

A
packet
of
a
kilogram
(2.2
pound)
of
baobab
powder
sells
for
around
27
euros
(about
$30)
in
Germany.
In
the
United
Kingdom,
a
100-milliliter
(3.38-ounce)
bottle
of
baobab
beauty
oil
can
fetch
25
pounds
(about
$33).

The
growing
industry
is
on
display
at
a
processing
plant
in
Zimbabwe,
where
baobab
pulp
is
bagged
separately
from
the
seeds.
Each
bag
has
a
tag
tracing
it
to
the
harvester
who
sold
it.
Outside
the
factory,
the
hard
shells
are
turned
into
biochar,
an
ash
given
to
farmers
for
free
to
make
organic
compost.

Harvesters
like
Bhitoni
say
they
can
only
dream
of
affording
the
commercial
products
the
fruit
becomes.
She
earns
17
cents
for
every
kilogram
of
the
fruit
and
she
can
spend
up
to
eight
hours
a
day
walking
through
the
sunbaked
savanna.
She
has
exhausted
the
trees
nearby.

“The
fruit
is
in
demand,
but
the
trees
did
not
produce
much
this
year,
so
sometimes
I
return
without
filling
up
a
single
sack,”
Bhitoni
said.
“I
need
five
sacks
to
get
enough
money
to
buy
a
10-kilogram
(22-pound)
packet
of
cornmeal.”

Some
individual
buyers
who
feed
a
growing
market
for
the
powder
in
Zimbabwe’s
urban
areas
prey
on
residents’
drought-induced
hunger,
offering
cornmeal
in
exchange
for
seven
20-liter
(around
4-gallon)
buckets
of
cracked
fruit,
she
said.

“People
have
no
choice
because
they
have
nothing,”
said
Kingstone
Shero,
the
local
councilor.
“The
buyers
are
imposing
prices
on
us
and
we
don’t
have
the
capacity
to
resist
because
of
hunger.”

Le
Breton
sees
better
prices
ahead
as
the
market
expands.

“I
think
that
the
market
has
grown
significantly,
(but)
I
don’t
think
it
has
grown
exponentially.
It’s
been
fairly
steady
growth,”
he
said.
“I
believe
at
some
point
that
it
will
increase
in
value
as
well.
And
at
that
point,
then
I
think
that
the
harvesters
will
really
start
to
be
earning
some
serious
income
from
the
harvesting
and
sale
of
this
really
truly
remarkable
fruit.”.

Zimtrade,
the
government
export
agency,
has
lamented
the
low
prices
paid
to
baobab
pickers
and
says
it’s
looking
at
partnering
with
rural
women
to
set
up
processing
plants.

The
difficult
situation
is
likely
to
continue
due
to
a
lack
of
negotiating
power
by
fruit
pickers,
some
of
them
children,
said
Prosper
Chitambara,
a
development
economist
based
in
Zimbabwe’s
capital,
Harare.

On
a
recent
day,
Bhitoni
walked
from
one
baobab
tree
to
the
next.
She
carefully
examined
each
fruit
before
leaving
the
smaller
ones
for
wild
animals
such
as
baboons
and
elephants
to
eat

an
age-old
tradition.

“It
is
tough
work,
but
the
buyers
don’t
even
understand
this
when
we
ask
them
to
increase
prices,”
she
said.

Post
published
in:

Featured

Diddy Even Bother Proof Reading? – See Also – Above the Law

Sean
“Diddy”
Combs
(Photo
by
Shareif
Ziyadat/Getty
Images)


Sean
Comb’s
Attorneys
Didn’t
Turn
Off
Track
Changes:


Not
sure
what
they
were
going
for
!


This
Calls
For
Drastic
Measures:


Tradition
goes
to
the
wayside
when
you
need
to
make
up
for
missed
cash
.


Looks
Like
Its
Curtains
For
Golden
Gate:


The
law
school
will
remain
closed
.


Quick
Lesson
On
Blackmailing
Judges:


Don’t
do
it!
Read
about
the
the
blunder
for
yourself
.


Data
Security
Lawyer
Secures
Spot
On
The
Finale!:


Tune
in
to
this
week’s
Master
Chef
!

Topics

The Am Law 100 Leads The Charge On Billable Rate Increases – Above the Law



Ed.
Note:

Welcome
to
our
daily
feature

Trivia
Question
of
the
Day!


According
to
the
Thomson
Reuters
Institute’s

Law
Firm
Rates
in
2024

report,
what
was
the
year-to-date
growth
in
worked
billable
rates
for
the
Am
Law
100?


Hint:
While
the
Am
Law
100
are
leading
the
way,
billing
rates
also
increased
in
the
Am
Law
Second
Hundred
and
midsize
law
firms
at
a
clip
of
5.9%
and
5.6%,
respectively.



See
the
answer
on
the
next
page.

Some Lawyers Dress Less Appropriately For Court – Above the Law

As
many
attorneys
intrinsically
understand,
there
is
an
unwritten
dress
code
that
most
lawyers
adhere
to
when
they
appear
in
court.
Although
I
am
unclear
about
the
dress
code
for
women,
most
lawyers
would
agree
that
men
should
wear
suits,
ties,
and
dress
shoes
when
they
appear
in
court.
Although
American
lawyers
do
not
wear
wigs
or
other
similar
accoutrements
of
the
legal
profession
to
court,
dressing
more
formally
to
court
makes
it
easier
for
court
staff
to
identify
lawyers
and
allows
attorneys
to
convey
their
respect
for
the
judicial
process.
Since
the
return
to
in-person
appearances
after
the
COVID-19
pandemic,
it
seems
like
an
increasing
number
of
lawyers
appear
in
court
in
apparel
that
does
not
abide
by
this
understood
dress
code.

Over
the
past
several
years,
I
have
seen
many
men
appear
in
court
in
suits
without
ties.
While
ties
can
sometimes
be
annoying,
putting
one
on
is
relatively
easy,
so
I
am
not
sure
why
so
many
attorneys
forgo
wearing
ties
to
court.
One
of
the
things
that
typically
distinguishes
business
formal
and
business
casual
attire
is
a
tie,
so
it
seems
like
it
would
be
a
no-brainer
that
male
attorneys
would
wear
a
tie
to
court.

Sure,
there
have
been
occasions
when
I
appeared
in
court
without
wearing
a
tie
or
even
without
wearing
a
suit
jacket.
If
I
was
just
dropping
off
papers
to
a
clerk’s
office
or
a
papers
submissions
part,
it
is
possible
that
I
would
not
wear
a
tie.
Sometimes,
you
might
get
treated
better
if
you
do
not
look
too
much
like
an
attorney.
However,
one
time
when
I
appeared
in
court
in
less
formal
attire,
I
had
to
see
a
judge
to
get
a
stipulation
“so
ordered”
that
I
thought
I
would
just
be
submitting,
so
lawyers
should
be
wary
since
they
may
end
up
seeing
a
judge
after
all
in
more
casual
attire.
Nevertheless,
if
male
lawyers
know
that
they
will
appear
in
front
of
judges,
it
usually
makes
sense
to
put
on
a
tie
since
this
signifies
the
solemnity
of
the
occasion.

Recently,
I
have
also
seen
lawyers
wear
sneakers
to
court
instead
of
dress
shoes.
Usually,
these
sneakers
look
professional

black,
brown,
or
some
other
muted
color.
However,
it
is
clear
that
the
footwear
worn
by
these
lawyers
are
not
the
typical
dress
shoes
that
usually
accompany
suits.

I
completely
understand
why
lawyers
would
want
to
wear
sneakers
instead
of
shoes.
Sometimes,
lawyers
need
to
walk
long
distances
to
travel
to
court
with
public
transportation,
and
it
is
more
comfortable
for
such
lawyers
to
wear
sneakers
in
such
instances
rather
than
shoes.
Other
times,
lawyers
have
a
medical
reason,
and
I
once
wore
sneakers
to
court
after
I
injured
my
foot.
However,
it
is
usually
easy
and
affordable
to
pick
up
a
decent
pair
of
dress
shoes,
so
sneakers
might
be
inappropriate
in
most
circumstances.

From
my
experience,
the
type
of
case
and
the
type
of
court
have
a
huge
impact
on
the
clothes
worn
by
a
lawyer
to
court.
I
have
appeared
in
a
number
of
compliance
parts
recently
in
which
dozens,
if
not
hundreds,
of
lawyers
discuss
discovery
disputes
in
front
of
court
staff,
and
lawyers
dress
down
likely
due
to
the
low
likelihood
of
speaking
to
a
judge.
I
have
also
appeared
in
landlord-tenant
courts
frequently
in
the
past
year
or
two,
and
it
seems
that
lawyers
in
such
cases
also
dress
down
on
occasion.
However,
I
have
never
seen
a
lawyer
dress
down
at
appearances
in
any
of
the
federal
cases
I
work
on,
likely
because
federal
courthouses
are
often
much
nicer
than
state
courthouses,
and
the
seriousness
of
the
cases
has
an
impact
on
the
apparel
decisions
of
attorneys.

I
am
not
judging
people
who
might
not
be
able
to
adhere
to
informal
dress
codes
due
to
economic
limitations
or
mistakes,
and
of
course,
people
can
adhere
to
any
dress
code
that
comports
with
their
gender
identity.
It
just
seems
to
me
that
many
lawyers
have
loosened
up
their
dress
code
when
they
appear
in
court
now
that
the
COVID-19
pandemic
has
passed,
and
I’d
love
to
hear
from
readers
of
this
column
who
witnessed
lawyers
dressing
down
in
court.
Ultimately,
if
there
are
no
issues
preventing
a
lawyer
from
dressing
formally
to
court,
this
is
usually
the
best
approach,
since
this
helps
court
staff
identify
lawyers,
and
dressing
formally
shows
the
respect
and
solemnity
attorneys
have
for
the
judicial
process.




Rothman Larger HeadshotJordan
Rothman
is
a
partner
of




The
Rothman
Law
Firm
,
a
full-service
New
York
and
New
Jersey
law
firm.
He
is
also
the
founder
of




Student
Debt
Diaries
,
a
website
discussing
how
he
paid
off
his
student
loans.
You
can
reach
Jordan
through
email
at





[email protected]
.

Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar Praised For Being ‘Superhuman’ – Above the Law

Elizabeth
Prelogar



Ed.
note
:
Welcome
to
our
daily
feature,

Quote
of
the
Day
.


Elizabeth
makes
what
she
does
look
pretty
easy
because
she
doesn’t
melt
down.
But
she
is
juggling
a
load
that
would
cause
most
people
to
melt
down.
I
think
for
her
to
maintain
her
life
and
her
family
and
do
her
job
taxes
even
her
superhuman
level
of
stamina
sometimes.
What
people
ought
to
know
is
just
how
much
she
shoulders
by
herself.
It’s
kind
of
crazy.





Tejinder
Singh
,
a
partner
at
Sparacino,
in
comments
given
to

Vanity
Fair

on
how
his
dear
law
school
friend

Elizabeth
Prelogar

handles
her
job
as
Solicitor
General.
Wayne
Kidwell,
an
old
family
friend,
said,
“I
hope
that
I
can
live
long
enough
that
I
can
see
her
nominated
to
the
US
Supreme
Court.”



Staci ZaretskyStaci
Zaretsky
 is
a
senior
editor
at
Above
the
Law,
where
she’s
worked
since
2011.
She’d
love
to
hear
from
you,
so
please
feel
free
to

email

her
with
any
tips,
questions,
comments,
or
critiques.
You
can
follow
her
on

X/Twitter

and

Threads

or
connect
with
her
on

LinkedIn
.

Golden Gate Law’s Doors Will Remain Closed – Above the Law

When
Golden
Gate
University
School
of
Law
decided
to
close
its
doors
and
funnel
its
remaining
students
to
nearby
accredited
institutions,
a
small
group
fought
hard
to
pry
the
Gate
back
open.
A
judge
recently
decided
whether
an
injunction
would
be
successful.

Reuters

has
coverage:

Golden
Gate
University’s
shuttered
law
school
will
remain
closed
after
a
judge
on
Monday
denied
an
injunction
to
reopen
it,
as
a
group
of
former
students
and
alumni
had
asked.

It’s
“unlikely”
that
the
plaintiffs
will
be
able
to
secure
a
court
order
to
reopen
the
123-year-old
San
Francisco
school
following
California
Superior
Court
Judge
Richard
Ulmer’s
latest
ruling,
said
Golden
Gate
Law
alum
Ryan
Griffith,
who
is
representing
the
plaintiffs.

It
has
been
a
honorable
fight,
but
the
judge
is
right
to
frame
the
practicalities
of
rehiring
faculty
and
administrators
needed
to
run
the
school
as
“disruptive.”
Even
if
it
did
reopen,
would
you
want
to
go
to
Golden
Gate?
Even
if
you
managed
to
pass
the
bar,
would
employers
respect
the
name
on
the
diploma?
This
isn’t
the
closure
the
plaintiffs
wanted,
but
at
least
there’s
some
closure.
The
door
remains
open
for
remedies
by
other
means;
stay
turned
for
the
hearing
on
Oct.
22nd
to
see
if
and
how
the
case
will
proceed.


California
Judge
Rejects
Bid
To
Reopen
123-Year-Old
Law
School

[Reuters]


Earlier:


Even
Golden
Gate
Law’s
Exit
Strategy
Has
A
Low
Passage
Rate



Chris
Williams
became
a
social
media
manager
and
assistant
editor
for
Above
the
Law
in
June
2021.
Prior
to
joining
the
staff,
he
moonlighted
as
a
minor
Memelord™
in
the
Facebook
group Law
School
Memes
for
Edgy
T14s
.
 He
endured
Missouri
long
enough
to
graduate
from
Washington
University
in
St.
Louis
School
of
Law.
He
is
a
former
boatbuilder
who
cannot
swim, a
published
author
on
critical
race
theory,
philosophy,
and
humor
,
and
has
a
love
for
cycling
that
occasionally
annoys
his
peers.
You
can
reach
him
by
email
at [email protected] and
by
tweet
at @WritesForRent.

Biglaw Firm Bucks Tradition To Try And Reverse 20 Percent Revenue Slump – Above the Law

The
last
three
years
haven’t
been
great
for
Cahill,
Gordon
&
Reindel.
The
New
York
mainstay
saw
its
revenue
take
a
20%
dive
over
that
period,
thanks
to

the
decline

in
the
high-yield
and
leveraged
loans
markets.
But
the
problem
went
deeper
than
a
decline
in
billables

they
also
lost
~12
partners
to
the
lateral
market.
And
as
managing
partner
Herbert
Washer

told
Bloomberg
Law
,
that
“woke
us
up
to
the
realities
of
the
legal
market.”

Historically,
Cahill
is
on
the
smaller
side
of
a
Biglaw
firm

300+
attorneys

and
eschews
the
lateral
market.
That
strategy
paid
off
with

sky-high
profits
per
partner

and
a

reputation

for

sharing
the
wealth

with
associates
via
generous

special
bonuses

But
in
the
year
of
our
lord
2024,
would
the
tried
and
true
(105
years
strong!)
strategy
still
work?

Well,
Cahill
decided
it
was
time
to
mix
it
up

adding
17
lateral
partners
and
expanding
into
the
private
credit,
bankruptcy,
M&A,
project
finance,
white-collar,
cryptocurrency,
congressional
investigations,
and
intellectual
property
litigation
practice
areas.
As
Washer
said,
“If
the
lateral
market
is
going
to
try
to
pull
people
from
Cahill,
well,
we
can
go
ahead
and
look
to
see
if
there
are
opportunities
for
us
to
pull
partners
from
other
law
firms.”

That
required
tweaking
the
firm’s
compensation
system.
And
it
sure
sounds
like
younger
attorneys
are
the
beneficiaries.

“We
have
very
high
profit
margins,
which
effectively
means
that
we
can
pay
our
partners
a
greater
percentage
of
our
revenue
than
many,
if
not
most,
of
our
peers,”
Washer
said.
“That
allows
us
to
offer
competitive
compensation
to
lateral
partners
because
we
have
the
profit
margins.”

The
firm
also
tweaked
its
compensation
system
to
allow
for
more
rapid
ascension,
so
lawyers
don’t
necessarily
have
to
wait
until
they’re
a
partner
in
their
50s
to
get
paid
top
dollar,
Washer
said.

Washer
noted,
“It’s
important
to
pay
people
what
they’re
worth
when
they’re
worth
it.”

And
the
new
outlook
is
already
paying
off.
“By
all
metrics

demand,
value
of
time,
billing,
revenue

I
think
the
firm
is
up
substantially
over
2023,”
said
Washer.
“We’ve
not
just
sustained
the
business

we’ve
grown
the
business.”
Plus
it
doesn’t
hurt
that
the
syndicated
loan
market
is
rebounding.

But
the
firm’s
expansion
doesn’t
mean
it’s
trying
to
be
all
things
to
all
people.
They
still
want
a
focused

and
elite

practice.
“We
want
to
be
top
tier
in
the
things
that
we
do,”
Washer
said.
“History
suggests
that
being
very
profitable
and
being
targeted
are
not
mutually
exclusive.”




Kathryn Rubino HeadshotKathryn
Rubino
is
a
Senior
Editor
at
Above
the
Law,
host
of

The
Jabot
podcast
,
and
co-host
of

Thinking
Like
A
Lawyer
.
AtL
tipsters
are
the
best,
so
please
connect
with
her.
Feel
free
to
email

her

with
any
tips,
questions,
or
comments
and
follow
her
on
Twitter

@Kathryn1
 or
Mastodon

@[email protected].