Top 50 Biglaw Firm Announces Bonuses, With More Money Added On Top For Its Busiest Billers – Above the Law

Biglaw
firms
keep
rolling
out
bonuses
as
the
year
draws
to
a
close,
and
associates
couldn’t
be
happier
about
it

especially
when
there’s
extra
bonus
money
to
be
had.

The
latest
firm
to
meet
the
market
in
terms
of
matching
Milbank’s
generous

year-end

and

special

bonuses
is
Winston
&
Strawn,
a
firm
that
brought
in
$1,190,728,000
gross
revenue
in
2023,
putting
it
at
No.
44
on
the
Am
Law
100. Here’s
what
the
bonus
and
salary
scale
looks
like
at
the
firm:

As
usual,
associates
must
meet
their
minimum
hours
threshold

and
we
believe
that’s
2000
hours

for
bonus
eligibility,
and
when
it
comes
to
Winston’s
special
bonuses,
they
will
be
awarded
with
the
following
guidance:


Associates
who
meet
or
exceed
their
hours
targets:
100%
of
special
bonus

Associates
who
meet
75%
or
more
of
their
hours
targets:
75%
of
special
bonus

Associates
who
are
between
50%
and
74%
of
their
hours
targets:
50%
of
special
bonus

Associates
who
are
under
50%
of
their
hours
targets:
no
special
bonus

If
you’ve
met
your
hours
qualifications
at
the
firm,
there’s
some
great
news
waiting
for
you.
Associates
who
have
“substantially”
exceeded
their
productivity
goals
will
receive
additional
bonuses,
on
top
of
their
year-end
and
special
bonuses.
Now
that’s
something
to
celebrate!

Congratulations
to
everyone
at
Winston
&
Strawn!
Associates
are
sure
to
have
a
happy
New
Year
when
bonus
money
hits
their
accounts
at
the
end
of
January
2025.

(Flip
to
the
next
page
to
read
the
firm’s
bonus
memo
in
full.)

Remember
everyone,
we
depend
on
your
tips
to
stay
on
top
of
compensation
updates,
so
when
your
firm
announces
or
matches,
please
text
us
(646-820-8477)
or email
us
 (subject
line:
“[Firm
Name]
Bonus/Matches”).
Please
include
the
memo
if
available.
You
can
take
a
photo
of
the
memo
and
send
it
via
text
or
email
if
you
don’t
want
to
forward
the
original
PDF
or
Word
file.

And
if
you’d
like
to
sign
up
for
ATL’s
Bonus
Alerts
(which
is
the
alert
list
we
also
use
for
salary
announcements),
please
scroll
down
and
enter
your
email
address
in
the
box
below
this
post.
If
you
previously
signed
up
for
the
bonus
alerts,
you
don’t
need
to
do
anything.
You’ll
receive
an
email
notification
within
minutes
of
each
bonus
announcement
that
we
publish.
Thanks
for
your
help!



Staci ZaretskyStaci
Zaretsky
 is
a
senior
editor
at
Above
the
Law,
where
she’s
worked
since
2011.
She’d
love
to
hear
from
you,
so
please
feel
free
to

email

her
with
any
tips,
questions,
comments,
or
critiques.
You
can
follow
her
on BlueskyX/Twitter,
and Threads, or
connect
with
her
on LinkedIn.


Bonus Time

Enter
your
email
address
to
sign
up
for
ATL’s

Bonus
&
Salary
Increase
Alerts
.


Prominent Law Firm Now Offering $150K Signing Bonus For Federal Clerks – Above the Law

With
Biglaw
bonus
news
sweeping
the
industry,
it’s
easy
for
those
on
the
outside
looking
in
to
feel
left
out.
But
there’s
good
news
for
those
who
aspire
to
clerk
for
federal
judges:
there’s
a
ton
of
money
waiting
for
you
on
the
other
side
of
your
clerkship

six
figures
of
it!

should
you
decide
to
become
a
Biglaw
associate.

It’s
well
known
that
federal
clerkships
are
incredibly
prestigious
and
highly
demanding,
and
many
high-end
firms
really
want
people
with
that
experience
to
work
for
them.
That’s
why
the
high
end
of
bonuses
for
federal
clerks
who
decide
to
join
Biglaw
firms
post-clerkship
reach
six
figures.
As
of
this
week,
a
leading
law
firm
is
officially
upping
the
financial
ante,
which
other
Biglaw
firms
eager
for
clerk
firepower
may
soon
match
or
even
exceed.

Boies
Schiller
Flexner,
a
litigation-focused
firm
that
brought
in
$246,000,000
gross
revenue
in
2023,
recently
announced
in
its

year-end
bonus
memo

that
it
would
be
offering
a
$150,000
signing
bonus
for
all
federal
district
and
appellate
court
clerks,
or
$175,000
if
the
lawyer
has
completed
multiple
qualifying
clerkships.
The
firm
now
takes
the
lead
among
all
other
Biglaw
firms
and
litigation
boutiques
that
offer
these
high-dollar
signing
bonuses
to
former
federal
clerks.

So,
why
did
the
firm
increase
its
signing
bonus
for
federal
clerks?
“As
a
disputes-focused
firm,
we
place
a
premium
on
courtroom
experience,
which
makes
attracting
judicial
clerks
a
priority
for
us,”

Matthew
L.
Schwartz
,
Boies
Schiller’s
managing
partner
and
chairman-elect,
explained
to
Above
the
Law.
Schwartz
continued,
saying,
“As
a
former
district
and
circuit
court
clerk
myself,
I
know
just
how
valuable
that
experience
is

seeing
litigation
of
all
sorts,
being
mentored
by
a
judge,
observing
how
lawyers,
judges,
and
juries
approach
cases.
We
operate
at
the
top
of
the
market
in
terms
of
the
complexity
of
the
disputes
we
handle,
which
requires
recruiting
and
retaining
the
best
talent.”

Schwartz
previously
noted
that
having
former
judicial
clerks
among
their
ranks
provided
a
“competitive
advantage”
to
the
firm.
“Although
compensation
is
only
one
reason
why
a
young
lawyer
should
want
to
start
his
or
her
career
at
BSF,”
he
tells
Above
the
Law,
“we
want
to
make
sure
we
are
compensating
judicial
clerks
for
their
experience.”

So,
which
other
firms
are
offering
six-figure
bonuses
to
former
clerks?

Cravath

offers
clerkship
bonuses
of
$125,000,
while
those
who
have
completed
a
clerkship
of
two
years
or
two
one-year
clerkships
will
receive
a
bonus
of
$150,000.

Susman
Godfrey
offers

$125,000
for
one
clerkship,
and
$150,000
for
two.
Quinn
Emanuel
has
a
clerkship
bonus
of

$125,000

for
a
single
year
of
clerkship
experience,
with
an
additional
$25,000
if
the
applicant
completes
a
second
qualifying
clerkship.
Hueston
Hennigan pays
$125,000

to
former
clerks,
while
Robins
Kaplan offers
$100,000
 bonuses
to
former
federal
clerks.
Fish
&
Richardson
made
headlines
with
an impressive
number
to
former
clerks
 ($115,000),
but
that
only
applies
to
folks
with
Federal
Circuit
experience
and
it
requires
two
years
of
service
as
a
clerk. Munger
Tolles
pays

a
bonus
of
$80,000
for
a
single
federal
clerkship,
and
$105,000
for
those
with
two
federal
clerkships
under
their
belt.

With
the
rush
on
top
talent
on
what’s
shaping
up
to
be
a
hot
lateral
market,
what
are
the
other
firms
waiting
for?
Don’t
they
want
to
capture
some
of
the
magic
that
former
federal
clerks
can
offer?
If
you
have
information
about
any
firm’s
clerkship
bonuses,
you
should

email
us
 or
text
us
(646-820-8477)
with
all
the
details.
Thanks.



Staci ZaretskyStaci
Zaretsky
 is
a
senior
editor
at
Above
the
Law,
where
she’s
worked
since
2011.
She’d
love
to
hear
from
you,
so
please
feel
free
to

email

her
with
any
tips,
questions,
comments,
or
critiques.
You
can
follow
her
on BlueskyX/Twitter,
and Threads, or
connect
with
her
on LinkedIn.


Bonus Time

Enter
your
email
address
to
sign
up
for
ATL’s

Bonus
&
Salary
Increase
Alerts
.


More Than 70 Organizations Urge Congress to Extend Enhanced Premium Tax Credits – MedCity News

More
than
70
organizations,
led
by
Families
USA,
sent
a

letter

to
Congress
on
Monday
calling
on
them
to
extend
the
enhanced
premium
tax
credits
that
are
set
to
expire
at
the
end
of
2025.
The
enhanced
premium
tax
credits,
introduced
in
2021,
reduced
health
insurance
premiums
for
millions
of
individuals
purchasing
coverage
through
the
marketplace.

Families
USA
is
an
advocacy
organization
for
healthcare
consumers.
The
letter
also
includes
child
advocates,
labor
groups,
equity
organizations,
patients,
providers,
disability
rights
groups
and
aging
organizations.

The
premium
tax
credit
is
a
refundable
credit
that
lowers
the
out-of-pocket
cost
of
health
insurance
premiums
for
those
who
receive
insurance
via
the
marketplaces.
Originally
available
to
individuals
with
incomes
between
100%
and
400%
of
the
federal
poverty
level,
the
American
Rescue
Plan
Act
(ARPA)
expanded
eligibility
to
those
with
incomes
above
400%
of
the
federal
poverty
level
and
lowered
the
maximum
household
contribution.

If
the
enhanced
premium
tax
credits
expire
at
the
end
of
2025,
older
and
rural
households
will
be
especially
impacted,
according
to
the
letter.
The
organizations
noted
that
one
in
five
small
business
owners
and
self-employed
workers
rely
on
the
marketplaces
for
coverage.
In
addition,
premiums
would
double
for
many
people
and
millions
would
completely
lose
coverage.

“Congress
needs
to
take
action
as
soon
as
possible,
because
while
the
credits
are
not
set
to
expire
in
federal
statute
until
December
31,
2025,
Americans
will
feel
the
impacts
far
sooner,”
the
letter
stated.
“Health
insurers
will
begin
setting
next
year’s
rates
as
early
as
this
spring,
new
rates
will
be
announced
by
summer,
and
by
fall
people
in
every
Congressional
district
will
experience
premium
shock
when
they
shop
for
2026
plans.”

The
letter
also
cited
a
new

survey

that
found
86%
of
2024
voters
want
the
tax
credits
extended,
and
the
organizations
argued
that
it’s
now
Congress’
responsibility
to
“demonstrate
that
they
are
listening
to
that
call
from
their
constituents.”

The
organizations
also
gave
specific
examples
of
people
who
would
be
affected
by
the
enhanced
premium
tax
credits
expiring.

“People
in
every
community
are
at
risk,”
they
said.
“This
includes
people
like
Dean,
a
34-year-old
self-employed
designer,
who
used
his
tax
credit
to
afford
a
plan
with
a
lower
deductible
and
out-of-pocket
maximum

which
proved
crucial
to
him
when
he
was
diagnosed
with
cancer
that
would
have
otherwise
subjected
him
to
financial
ruin.
Jenny,
a
64-year-old
woman
who
used
her
tax
credit
to
buy
a
plan
for
$500
per
month
that
helped
cover
her
million
dollar
hospital
bill
and
treatment
after
she
experienced
a
stroke.
Without
that
coverage

facilitated
by
the
tax
credit

she
and
her
husband
would
have
lost
their
home
and
life
savings
to
pay
for
care.”

The
letter
comes
after
the
Congressional
Budget
Office
released
a

report

last
week
on
the
enhanced
premium
tax
credits.
It
found
that
if
there
isn’t
an
extension
through
2026,
the
number
of
people
without
insurance
will
increase
by
2.2
million
in
that
year
and
gross
benchmark
premiums
will
increase
by
4.3%
on
average.


Photo:
alexsl,
Getty
Images

Morning Docket: 12.11.24 – Above the Law

*
Letting
the
Supreme
Court
pick
its
own
cases
was
a
mistake.
[NY
Times
]

*
United
Healthcare
committed
to
denying
even
more
claims.
[Law.com]

*
Bankruptcy
judge
decides
bails
out
Alex
Jones.
[Bloomberg
Law
News
]

*
Mega
grocery
merger
blocked.
[Law360]

*
Biden
to
veto
judiciary
expansion
bill
following
Trump
win.
[Reuters]

*
Prosecutors
charge
a
pair
of
law
firms
for
staging
automobile
accidents.
Those
pesky
safe
driving
courses
have
made
lawyers
resort
to
this
to
keep
food
on
the
table!
[The
Guardian
]

*
Trump’s
DOJ
ignored
procedure
to
steal
journalist
and
staff
phone
records
while
searching
for
a
leak.
[AP
News
]

Mphoko’s wish was to be buried at his plot in Bulawayo: family

HARARE

Late
former
Vice
President
Phekelezela
Mphoko
would
likely
be
buried
at
his
plot
in
Douglasdale
Bulawayo
“as
per
his
wishes”,
family
has
revealed,
becoming
the
latest
among
liberation
war’s
towering
figures
to
turn
their
backs
on
the
National
Heroes
Acre.

Mphoko
died
aged
84
in
India
when
he
was
receiving
treatment
over
an
undisclosed
ailment.

He
was
immediately
declared
a
national
hero
by
government,
paving
way
for
his
interment
at
the
national
shrine
in
Harare.

But
it
has
turned
out
the
former
VP’s
wishes
were
to
be
buried
at
his
plot,
far
from
the
National
Heroes
Acre
where
his
war
contemporaries
lie
buried.


Family
spokesperson
Ndaba
Mphoko
confirmed
to
ZimLive
that
his
brother
would
be
buried
at
his
plot.

Ndaba
Mphoko
said
he
could
not
speak
authoritatively
over
the
former
VP’s
repatriation
plans
as
this,
by
virtue
of
government
declaring
him
a
national
hero,
meant
that
the
duty
of
bringing
his
remains
home
and
subsequent
burial
was
now
a
“dual
responsibility
between
government
and
the
family”.

He
said
the
family
is
currently
looking
on
government
to
take
the
lead.

However,
in
terms
of
where
the
former
ambassador
to
Russia
and
South
Africa
was
to
be
buried,
Ndaba
Mphoko
confirmed
the
family
wants
him
buried
at
his
plot
“as
per
his
wishes”.

Asked
if
the
government
was
aware
of
that,
he
said,
“that
has
been
intimated
to
the
government
that
his
wishes
were
to
be
buried
at
his
plot
in
Douglasdale,
Bulawayo”.

“We
will
perhaps
formally
submit
some
written
communication
to
the
government
to
confirm
that
there
was
such
arrangement
in
place
prior
to
his
passing.”

Mphoko
said
he
was
not
aware
of
any
reasons
why
his
brother
chose
to
be
buried
elsewhere
other
than
the
national
shrine.

“That
was
his
wish
and
I
am
not
in
a
position
to
know
how
he
came
up
with
that
decision.
He
did
not
tell
me,”
he
said.

The
late
Mphoko,
who
was
the
country’s
vice
president
between
2014
and
2017,
is
the
latest
liberation
war
hero
to
snub
the
iconic
cemetary.

Late
former
President
Robert
Mugabe,
who
diligently
presided
over
many
burials
of
his
war
comrades
at
the
elevated
cemetery,
ironically
told
his
family
before
he
died
that
he
was
not
going
to
be
buried
at
the
National
Heroes
Acre.

The
once
powerful
leader,
ousted
in
a
November
2017
military
coup
that
installed
his
former
right-hand
man
and
Zimbabwe
incumbent
President
Emmerson
Mnangagwa,
had
ironically
been
accused
of
cherry-picking
loyalists,
some
far
from
deserving,
to
be
buried
at
the
national
shrine.

Among
some
liberation
war
luminaries
who
have
also
refused
to
be
buried
at
the
national
heroes
acre
are
late
former
Matabeleland
North
governor
Welshman
Mabhena
who
once
said
he
would
not
want
to
be
buried
among
“thieves
and
murderers”.

Similarly,
late
Dumiso
Dabengwa,
a
former
government
minister
who
later
turned
opposition
politician,
also
refused
to
be
interred
at
the
national
shrine,
preferring
to
be
buried
in
his
Ntabazinduna
home.

Late
former
PF
ZAPU
stalwart
and
ex-minister
Tshinga
Dube,
just
like
former
minister
Edgar
Tekere,
both
rejected
burial
at
the
National
Heroes
Acre
before
they
died
but
were
dragged
there
by
the
government.

Most
liberation
war
heroes
who
have
snubbed
the
national
shrine
have
felt
ostracised
by
the
country’s
leaders
who
have
presided
over
Zimbabwe’s
toxic
politics.

Villagers protest cement project ahead of Hurungwe Council meeting

MAGUNJE

Villagers
in
Hurungwe
district
are
raising
alarm
over
a
Chinese-owned
cement
project
they
allege
has
proceeded
through
illegal
means,
threatening
their
homes,
livelihoods,
and
the
local
environment.

The
Hurungwe
Rural
District
Council
(HRDC)
has
called
for
an
inception
meeting
on
Wednesday,
11
December,
to
introduce
WHI-ZIM
Construction
Material
Investments
Pvt
Ltd
project,
but
critics
claim
the
process
is
marred
by
corruption
and
disregard
for
due
process.

WHI-ZIM,
a
joint
venture
between
Lebanmon
Investments
and
West
International
Holding,
has
promised
to
invest
US$1
billion
in
Mashonaland
West’s
cement
industry,
and
further
promised
to
create
5,000
jobs
and
boost
foreign
currency
earnings.

However,
villagers
from
Chasara
and
Kapere
say
the
project
comes
at
a
steep
cost,
with
over
80
families
facing
displacement.


Elderly
residents,
including
a
partially
blind
woman
in
her
70s,
have
been
particularly
affected.
Vegetable
gardens
were
burnt
down,
fields
cordoned
off,
and
three
women,
two
of
whom
are
over
70,
were
apprehended
and
charged
with
malicious
damage
to
property
for
allegedly
unlawfully
entering
their
fields.

The
matter
remains
before
the
courts.
Additional
arrests
followed,
with
others
accused
of
disturbing
the
peace
and
aiding
alleged
invaders.

Despite
the
promises
of
economic
transformation,
the
villagers
argue
that
the
human
toll
has
been
devastating.

Residents
accuse
company
representatives,
accompanied
by
armed
police,
of
forcibly
depositing
construction
materials
on
communal
land
without
legal
permits
or
occupancy
certificates.

They
are
also
furious
at
Chief
Chanetsa
of
Hurungwe
who
endorsed
the
construction
of
a
cement
and
power
station
plant
on
135
hectares
of
land
at
Katenhe
Turn-Off,
Ward
11,
Magunje
Constituency.

In
a
letter
to
the
HRDC,
Chief
Chanetsa
said
the
project,
spearheaded
by
Labenmon
Investments,
promises
significant
community
benefits,
including
the
construction
of
six
classroom
blocks,
two
clinics,
10
solar-powered
boreholes,
and
a
45km
concrete
road.

“If
there
is
any
field
affected
within
these
135
hectares,
we
have
agreed
with
the
company
that
it
shall
fully
compensate
the
affected
area,”
Chief
Chanetsa
wrote.

“In
my
capacity
as
the
Chief
responsible
for
the
area
of
the
proposed
cement
and
power
station
plant…I
have
no
objection
to
such
a
big
project
which
will
contribute
more
to
the
vision
of
My
President.”

He
spoke
even
as
the
cement
plant,
located
less
than
1.4
kilometers
upstream
of
Magunje
Dam,
has
raised
concerns
among
environmentalists.
The
dam,
the
district’s
primary
water
source,
sustains
agriculture
and
local
ecosystems.
Critics
warn
that
emissions
and
pollutants
could
contaminate
the
dam,
causing
irreversible
damage.

Villagers
also
allege
irregularities
in
the
project’s
Environmental
Impact
Assessment
(EIA).
Approved
under
EMA
Certificate
No.
10000034346,
the
EIA
lists
conditions,
including
the
protection
of
Kamreza
Dam
and
compliance
with
environmental
laws.

Local
residents
say
the
assessment
failed
to
address
critical
risks,
such
as
air
and
water
pollution.
Consultations
were
reportedly
held
120
kilometers
away
in
Chinhoyi,
with
findings
never
shared
locally.

“The
corruption
here
is
blatant.
People
are
being
forced
off
their
land
while
officials
look
the
other
way,”
said
a
community
activist
who
requested
anonymity
fearing
reprisals.

Insiders
revealed
that
WHI-ZIM
began
fencing
off
communal
land
in
July
2024,
despite
lacking
an
occupancy
certificate,
leaving
families
landless
ahead
of
the
farming
season
and
depriving
livestock
of
grazing
areas.
Seasonal
gardens
and
vital
resources
were
also
destroyed
during
the
fencing
off
period,
disrupting
livelihoods,
villagers
said,
adding
that
the
fenced
area
is
now
a
no-go-area.

The
Environmental
Impact
Assessment
(EIA)
certificate
issued
by
the
Environmental
Management
Agency
(EMA)
explicitly
requires
that
no
project
activities
proceed
until
all
affected
individuals
are
compensated
and
relocated,
as
outlined
in
its
special
conditions.

The
EIA
seen
by
Kukurigo
also
requires
compliance
with
air
pollution
laws,
and
the
installation
of
emissions
monitoring
systems.
It
is
not
clear
if
this
has
been
put
in
place
as
noncompliance
could
result
in
the
cancellation
of
the
EIA
certificate
under
Section
104
of
the
Environmental
Management
Act.

“Compensation
and
relocation
of
all
the
affected
households
should
be
done
and
finalized
before
any
commencement
of
works,”
the
EIA
states.

However,
villagers
claim
there
has
been
no
communication
regarding
relocation
or
compensation.

Multiple
complaints
have
been
sent
to
EMA,
the
Zimbabwe
Anti-Corruption
Commission
(ZACC),
and
the
Ministry
of
Local
Government,
among
others,
but
residents
say
they
have
received
no
responses
since
May
2024.

The
HRDC’s
last-minute
meeting
invitation
has
only
deepened
mistrust.

“Why
involve
us
now,
after
the
project
is
already
underway?
And
in
any
case
we
are
being
arrested
if
we
go
into
our
gardens.
This
seems
like
a
way
to
legitimize
decisions
made
in
secret,”
said
a
resident.

Villagers
are
demanding
transparency,
a
halt
to
the
project,
and
meaningful
consultations
before
further
action
is
taken.

“Our
only
hope
now
is
the
President,”
said
one
villager,
expressing
frustration
over
inaction
from
authorities.

Govt urged to prioritise NatPharm in budget allocation

NatPharm
is
a
parastatal
under
the
Ministry
of
Health
and
Child
Care
(MoHCC)which
is
involved
in
procurement,
warehousing
and
distribution
of
medicines
and
medical
supplies.

The
health
sector
was
allocated
ZiG28.3
billion,
which
is
equivalent
to
US$785.9
million.
The
amount
is
11.8
percent
of
the
total
budget,
a
slight
increase
from
the
previous
year’s
allocation
which
was
11
percent.

However,
according
to
the
Abuja
Declaration,
the
government
must
allocate
at
least
15
percent
of
its
total
budget
to
the
health
sector.

Luveve-Makhandeni
constituency
MP,
Discent
Bajila,
who
sits
on
the
health
committee,
said
the
sector
needs
at
least
17
million
to
buy
adequate
medicines.

“The
first
thing
that
the
Finance
Minister
must
do
is
to
disburse
the
Health
Budget
fully.
Allocating
resources
only
to
refuse
to
disburse
them
is
an
act
of
grandstanding
and
sabotage.
Sabotaging
healthcare
is
genocide.
Secondly,
more
focus
should
be
in
capacitating
NATPHARM
to
meet
the
country’s
monthly
needs
for
medicines,”said
Bajila.

“SIRDC
also
needs
to
be
capacitated
to
conduct
health
research
using
local
Contemporary
samples.
Lastly,
access
to
sexual
and
reproductive
health
services
needs
lots
of
attention
for
Zimbabwe
to
make
its
contribution
to
the
elimination
of
HIV/AIDS.”

The
Zimbabwe
Coalition
on
Debt
and
Development
(ZIMCODD)
noted
that
the
resources
earmarked
for
health
are
not
sufficient
to
finance
the
attainment
of
the
policy
goals
and
objectives
stated
in
the
National
Health
Strategy
(NHS)
(2021

2025),
as
outlined
in
the
Investment
Case
for
the
NHS
(2021-2025).

“The
allocation
falls
short
of
the
bare
minimum
of
earmarking
at
least
15%
of
the
budget
to
health
as
agreed
under
the
Abuja
Declaration.
The
2025
National
Budget
will
be
unable
to
fund
the
country’s
monthly
requirements
for
medicines.
Our
people
will
continue
to
rely
on
hope
and
religion
for
their
healing
needs,”
ZIMCODD
stated.

At the Third TLTF Summit, Legal Tech Leaders Convened in Miami for Three Days of Dialogue and Serendipity

If
there
is
a
single
“it”
conference
right
now
in
legal
tech,
it
is
the

TLTF
Summit
.
Last
week
was
the
third
annual
occurrence
of
this
invite-only
event,
and
while
organizers
accepted
500
registrants

up
from
150
the
first
year

it
left
another
1,000
hopefuls
sitting
on
a
waiting
list.

I
guess
I
was
right
when,
after
the
first
year,
I
predicted
that
when
registrations
opened
for
the
second
year,
“it
will
likely
be
the
legal
tech
equivalent
of
a
Taylor
Swift
ticket.”

For
those
who
did
score
an
invite,
it
was
well
worth
their
time

and
not
just
for
the
opportunity
to
visit
Miami
in
December.
 Every
attendee
that
I
had
the
chance
to
speak
to
described
this
event,
without
reservation,
as
the
best
legal
tech
conference
they’d
been
to.
Not
the
best
legal
tech
conference
this
year,
mind
you,
but
the
best

ever
.

If
“renewal
rate”
is
any
indication,
consider
that
of
the
150
who
attended
the
first
year,
108
have
attended
each
subsequent
year.
(Me
among
them.)
Some
additional
number
of
those
first-year
attendees
have
attended
at
least
one
additional
year.



Legal
futurist
Richard
Susskind
was
featured
in
a
fireside
chat.

In
fact,
being
a
three-peat
was
a
badge
of
honor
at
the
conference

quite
literally

in
that
the
name
badges
showed
the
years
the
person
had
attended.

After
the
first
TLTF
Summit,
I
described
it
as

the
Davos
of
legal
tech
,
in
that
it
brought
together
leaders
from
across
disciplines
to
engage
in
open
and
unfettered
dialogue
about
the
state
and
future
of
legal
innovation.

To
encourage
dialogue
(and
networking),
the
summit
operates
under
the

Chatham
House
Rule
,
by
which
participants
are
free
to
use
the
information
they
receive,
but
not
reveal
the
identify
or
affiliation
of
any
speaker
or
participant.



Miami
Mayor
Francis
Suarez
was
on
hand
to
welcome
attendees
to
the
opening
night
reception.

Also
helping
to
foster
dialogue
is
the
summit’s
intimacy.
With
just
150
participants
the
first
year
and
300
last
year,
some
worried
that
this
year’s
jump
to
500
would
stifle
that
sense
of
intimacy.
Thankfully,
it
did
not.

In
fact,
this
year’s
summit
was
everything
it
had
been
in
those
prior
two
years,
and
maybe
more.
Among
those
who
attended
for
the
first
time
this
year,
the
only
regret
I
heard
was
that
they
hadn’t
attended
the
prior
two.


Thought
Leaders
At
the
Forefront

By
way
of
background,
the
TLTF
Summit
is
produced
by
 The
LegalTech
Fund
,
the
first
venture
capital
firm
to
focus
exclusively
on
legal
tech.
The
goal
of
the
summit
is
to
bring
together
“the
most
innovative
thought-leaders
at
the
forefront
of
the
legal
industry.”

It
featured
three
days
of
programming
along
seven
tracks:
general,
law
firm,
ALSP,
GC/legal
ops,
compliance,
fintech
and
consumer.
There
were
16
panels,
seven
roundtables,
four
education
sessions,
and
four
fireside
chats.



Discussing
how
legal
AI
startups
compete
against
AI
giants
were
Nikki
Shaver,
CEO
of
Legaltech
Hub;
Pablo
Arredondo,
vice
president,
CoCounsel,
Thomson
Reuters;
Steve
Gong,
corporate
counsel,
head
of
data
science
&
operations,
Google;
and
Julian
Tsisin,
director
legal
and
compliance
technology,
Meta.

Interspersed
through
the
three
days
was
the
Startup
Showcase,
where
pre-seed
through
Series
A
companies,
selected
by
a
panel
of
judges,
took
to
the
stage
and
presented
their
pitches.
Twenty-four
companies
presented,
out
of
200
applicants.
Five
were
selected
by
attendees
to
present
as
finalists
on
the
last
day
of
the
summit.

(The
five
that
attendees
voted
to
be
finalists
were:

Rasa
,

Boltive
,

Trustie
,

Skribe

and

Neur.on
.)


Engagement
and
Serendipity

If
you
have
read
this
far,
no
doubt
you
are
wondering
just
what
it
is
that
makes
this
conference
so
special.
As
someone
who
has
attended
more
than
my
fair
share
of
legal
tech
conferences
over
the
years,
I
have
come
to
understand
that
the
qualities
that
separate
a
great
conference
from
a
mediocre
or
poor
one
are
largely
intangible
and
therefore
difficult
to
define.
But
let
me
try.

Without
question,
the
defining
trait
of
this
summit
is
its
atmosphere
of
engagement,
discovery
and
serendipity.



On
the
startup
showcase
stage,
Karl
Seelbach,
founder
of
Skribe.ai,
delivers
his
pitch.

At
the
opening
of
last
year’s
summit,
organizer Zach
Posner
,
cofounder
and
managing
director
of
The
LegalTech
Fund,
urged
attendees
to
“skip
a
session,
skip
every
single
session,”
and
instead,
“Take
a
walk
with
somebody.”
Conjuring
a
concept conceived
by
business
author
Jim
Collins
,
Posner
said,
“Our
goal
is
to
make
‘who
luck’
happen.”

I
do
not
know
whether
he
again
invoked
“who
luck”
this
year,
as
I
arrived
late
to
his
opening
keynote,
but
regardless,
it
was
available
in
abundance.
As
noted,
the
conference
operates
under
the
Chatham
House
Rule,
and
attendees
are
encouraged
to
talk
often
and
openly
with
one
another

even
better
if
the
talk
is
with
a
stranger.

To
underscore
this,
attendees
this
year
were
given
bingo
cards
with
which
they
could
win
prizes
by
identifying
people
who,
for
example,
owned
a
working
farm
or
had
been
in
legal
tech
since
the
1980s.
The
hallways
were
constantly
full
of
people
sitting
and
standing
in
pairs
or
groups,
engaged
in
animated
conversation,
and
a
large
room
was
set
up
as
an
all-day
coffee
shop
with
tables
and
even
live
music.

This
isn’t
networking
in
the
traditional
sense
of
exchanging
business
cards
and
elevator
pitches.
Instead,
it’s
an
intentional
cultivation
of
serendipitous
connections.


Unique
Mix
of
Participants

Of
course,
encouraging
conversation
would
be
fruitless
if
there
were
no
one
interesting
with
whom
to
converse.

After
the
conference
was
over,
one
participant

a
veteran
of
many
legal
tech
conferences

told
me
that
what
most
impressed
him
was
how
smart
the
attendees
were.
That
might
sound
pretentious,
but
it
is
probably
also
factually
accurate.
The
people
who
attend
this
conference
are
the
cream
of
the
crop
of
those
who
are
thinking
about
and
working
on
the
future
of
legal
practice
and
legal
technology.



Cartoonists
captured
the
key
points
of
each
session.

Driving
that
is
the
summit’s
unique
mix
of
attendees.
The
summit
somehow
manages
to
draw
a
mix
of
people
unlike
what
I
see
at
any
other
legal
tech
conference.
There
are
veteran
founders
and
big-name
CEOs.
There
are
fledgling
startups
and
late-stage
enterprises.
There
are
law
firm
innovation
leaders
and
corporate
operations
professionals.
There
are
practicing
lawyers
and
legal
academics.
There
are
people
from
the
public
sector
and
people
from
“legal
tech
adjacent”
consultancies
and
service
providers.

Most
significantly,
at
least
to
my
mind,
there
are
investors
from
major
venture
capital
and
financial
firms,
who
are
open
and
active
participants.
This
is
unlike
at
other
conferences,
where,
if
they
attend
at
all,
they
tend
to
lurk
in
the
shadows,
prospecting
in
stealth
mode.

At
the
TLTF
Summit,
a
late-stage
enterprise
CEO
might
find
herself
in
deep
conversation
with
a
pre-seed
startup
founder.
A
criminal
defense
lawyer
could
be
discussing
artificial
intelligence
with
a
venture
capitalist.
Or
maybe
all
four
of
those
people
are
sitting
together
over
a
cocktail
in
the
balmy
twilight.


Sales-Free
Zone

In
virtually
every
conversation
I
had,
I
asked
people
what
they
thought
of
the
summit.
As
I
already
reported
above,
to
a
one
they
said
that
it
was
the
best
legal
tech
conference
they
had
attended.
Every
time
they
said
that,
my
next
question
was,
“Why?”

Two
answers
came
back
to
me
over
and
over
again.

One
was
what
I
have
already
described,
which
is
the
diverse
mix
of
attendees,
all
thought
leaders
in
their
respective
fields.

The
second
was
the
freedom
from
sales.
Remarkably
at
the
summit,
no
one
was
selling
anything.
There
were
no
exhibit
booths.
Elevators
did
not
blast
advertising.
Vendors’
branding
did
not
cover
every
surface.



Meals
were
served
with
an
ocean
view.

From
what
I
heard,
this
was
liberating
for
both
vendors
and
others.
Of
the
people
I
spoke
to
who
work
for
legal
tech
companies,
most
of
whom
were
top
executives
of
those
companies,
their
shared
refrain
was
how
freeing
it
felt
to
be
at
a
conference
where
they
did
not
have
to
be
constantly
selling.
By
the
same
token,
the
lawyers
and
other
professionals
I
spoke
to
expressed
how
relieved
they
were
to
not
constantly
be
the
target
of
sales
pitches.

No
one
comes
to
the
summit
to
make
sales
(at
least
not
directly).
People
are
there
to
learn
and
share
and
collaborate
and
maybe
expand
their
perspectives
and
horizons.
And,
honestly,
that
simple
fact
created
an
air
of
lightness
at
the
summit
that
was
buoying.


But
Deals
Do
Get
Done

To
be
clear,
while
no
one
at
the
summit
was
there
to
sell
products,
there
were
deals
getting
done.
Investments
were
getting
discussed.
Acquisitions
were
getting
germinated.
Jobs
were
getting
offered.
Things
happen
at
this
conference,
make
no
mistake
about
that,
but
they
happen
discretely.

In
fact,
Posner,
in
his
keynote,
gave
some
numbers
about
deals
from
the
prior
years’
summits

at
least
the
deals
he
knows
of.
As
a
result
of
the
2022
and
2023
summits,
there
were:

  • 18
    rounds
    of
    funding.
  • 3
    M&A
    events.
  • 20
    job
    changes.
  • 30
    bizdev
    relationships.

Only
time
will
tell
what
emerges
from
this
year.



Between
meals,
snacks
were
abundant.


Other
Standout
Features

While
those
are
some
of
the
intangibles
that
make
this
summit
great,
there
were
also
a
number
of
tangible
factors:

  • Top-notch
    programming
    and
    speakers.
    Look,
    for
    the
    reasons
    I’ve
    already
    discussed,
    if
    you
    never
    went
    to
    a
    single
    panel
    during
    the
    conference,
    you
    are
    forgiven.
    But
    the
    panels
    provided
    plenty
    of
    incentive
    to
    break
    away
    from
    all
    those
    hallway
    conversations
    and
    learn
    from
    experts.
    Particularly
    thought
    provoking
    were
    the
    four
    fireside
    chats
    that
    punctuated
    the
    summit,
    featuring
    conversations
    with
    U.S.
    Sen.
    John
    Hickenlooper
    (D-CO),
    Carta
    CEO
    Henry
    Ward,
    criminal
    defense
    lawyers
    Alan
    Dershowitz
    and
    Alex
    Spiro,
    and
    legal
    futurist
    Richard
    Susskind.
  • Picture-perfect
    venue.
    Four
    words:
    Ritz
    Carlton
    Key
    Biscayne.
    Need
    I
    say
    more?
  • Good
    and
    seemingly
    limitless
    food.
    The
    conference
    served
    breakfast,
    lunch
    and
    dinner,
    all
    of
    which
    were
    tasty
    and
    included
    vegetarian
    and
    gluten-free
    options.
    In
    between
    meals
    were
    various
    arrays
    of
    snacks
    and
    sweets.
    Most
    meals
    could
    be
    taken
    outside
    or
    inside,
    and
    the
    second
    day’s
    breakfast
    was
    broken
    up
    by
    interest
    groups.
  • No
    legal
    tech
    conference
    does
    swag
    like
    the
    TLTF
    Summit.
    At
    a
    designated
    hour,
    it
    threw
    open
    the
    doors
    to
    a
    swag
    room

    or
    what
    you
    might
    have
    thought
    was
    a
    gold
    rush

    as
    an
    onslaught
    of
    attendees
    filled
    swag
    bags
    with
    hoodies
    and
    t-shirts
    and
    hats
    and
    socks
    and
    sandals
    and
    all
    sorts
    of
    other
    paraphernalia.
    It
    was
    an
    embarrassment
    of
    riches
    that
    to
    some
    seemed
    over
    the
    top,
    even
    as
    they
    rifled
    around
    for
    a
    size
    L
    hoodie.


Did
I
Just
Say
‘Chill’?

On
the
last
day
of
the
conference,
several
people
asked
me
what
my
big
takeaway
was
or
what
I
saw
as
the
big
theme.
Sure,
everyone
was
talking
about
gen
AI,
just
as
they
do
at
every
other
conference.
But
that
wasn’t
the
takeaway.



The
swag
room
was
an
embarrassment
of
riches.

If
I
haven’t
by
now
already
made
it
clear,
for
me,
the
theme
was
the
value
of
networking,
and
of
networking
beyond
your
comfort
zone

of
letting
serendipity
happen,
“who
luck”
happen.
I
met
so
many
new
people
this
week,
and
so
many
of
the
conversations
I
had
with
those
people
were
not
just
conference
chitter-chatter,
but
substantive
and
thoughtful
and
even
challenging
interactions.

A
unique
feature
of
this
conference
over
others
I’ve
attended
was
that
everyone
seemed
to
feel
free
and
relaxed
and
unburdened
and
open.
No
one
was
too
big
or
important
to
approach,
or
too
unapproachable
because
they
were
surrounded
by
their
people.
Everyone
was
on
equal
footing,
and
everyone
engaged
as
co-equal
peers.

People
often
refer
to
conferences
as
“shows,”
and
maybe
that
is
partly
because
we
are
all
expected
to
perform
when
we
attend
them,
to
be
“on”
and
play
our
designated
role.

Here,
the
pretense
seemed
to
melt
away.
I
found
myself
several
times
describing
the
conference
as
“chill”

which
is,
trust
me,
not
a
word
I
often
use,
and
certainly
not
to
describe
a
legal
tech
conference.
People
seemed
to
relax
and
let
down
their
guards
and
thereby
open
themselves
to
truly
engaging
with
one
another.

I
am
leaving
the
TLTF
Summit
energized,
enthusiastic,
and
grateful
for
all
the
“who
luck”
that
happened
for
me
there.
And,
of
course,
I
am
already
looking
forward
to
next
year’s
summit

provided
I
can
score
one
of
those
coveted
invites.