Want An Elite Senior Partner On Your Case? Be Ready To Pay $3000 An Hour. – Above the Law

One
thing
is
certain
about
Biglaw
billable
rates

they’re

always
going
up
.
Despite
that
maximum,
it’s
still
news
in
the
industry.
It
was

more
than
a
decade
ago

that
partner
billing
rates
first
hit
$1,000/hour,
but
it

wasn’t
much
longer

before
we

hit
the
$2K
mark
.
Now,
according
to
data
from
Valeo
Partners,
we’ve
approached
the
$3,000/hr
line.

Thanks
to
the
disclosures
required
in
bankruptcy
fee
filings,

Law.com
was

already
able
to
suss
out
some
of
the
firms
nearing
the
$3K
threshold.

Valeo
Partners
declined
to
name
the
firms.
However,
some
recent
bankruptcy
fee
packages
reveal
some
firms
are
close
to
the
$3,000
mark
already.
Wilson
Sonsini
Goodrich
Rosati
billed
$2,720
an
hour
this
year
for
top
partners
in
the
Rite-Aid
bankruptcy.
McDermott
Will
&
Emery
was
charging
top
partners
out
at
$2,590
hourly
at
the
end
of
2023
in
the
Mountain
Express
Oil
Co.
bankruptcy.

Overall,
Valeo
Partners
estimates
that,
for
the
Am
Law
50,
senior
partners
billing
rates
will
average
$2,100
in
2024,
with
partners
averaging
$1,900/hour.

However,
sky-high
rates
for
the
tippy
top
of
the
Biglaw
food
chain
are
pretty
understandable.
But
that
isn’t
the
only
place
Biglaw
is
increasing
rates.
Third-year
associates…
yup,
those
only
three
years
removed
from
law
school…
are
being
billed
out
at
a
bunch
of
firms
at
over
a
cool
grand.

For
associates,
rate
increases
will
be
more
notable
among
third-years.
Currently,
16
of
the
Am
Law
50
firms
have
third-year
associates
with
rates
over
$1,000,
but
Valeo
projects
around
half
of
the
Am
Law
50
to
have
rates
of
over
$1,000
amongst
this
group
by
2025.

Billing
rates
for
first-year
associates
are
approaching
$1,000
at
a
handful
of
firms,
with
Paul,
Weiss,
Rifkind,
Wharton
&
Garrison
charging
a
minimum
of
$895
for
associates
in
2024,
bankruptcy
records
show.
Sullivan
&
Cromwell
charges
nearly
as
much—$850
hourly—for
first-years.

Sullivan
&
Cromwell
and
Paul
Weiss
also
have
among
the
top
rates
for
senior
associates,
with
associates
maxing
out
at
$1,575
at
Sullivan
&
Cromwell
and
$1,560
at
Paul
Weiss.

And
while
that
may
give
some
sticker
shock,
once

senior
associates
crossed
into
the
four-figure
billing
rates
,
it
was
only
a
matter
of
time
for
junior
rates
to
hit
that
benchmark.
This
will,

seemingly
inevitably
,
trigger
the
latest
round
of

complaints

over
the
high
cost
of
top-notch
legal
talent.
Of
course,
that
might
just
be
a
ruse
for
markdown,
since
in-house
counsels’
tolerance
for
big
bills
(from
the
right
lawyer)
only
seems
to
be
growing.




Kathryn Rubino HeadshotKathryn
Rubino
is
a
Senior
Editor
at
Above
the
Law,
host
of

The
Jabot
podcast
,
and
co-host
of

Thinking
Like
A
Lawyer
.
AtL
tipsters
are
the
best,
so
please
connect
with
her.
Feel
free
to
email

her

with
any
tips,
questions,
or
comments
and
follow
her
on
Twitter

@Kathryn1
 or
Mastodon

@[email protected].

Lawyer Facing Disbarment Has DEEP THOUGHTS About Kamala Harris’s Legal Chops – Above the Law

(Photo
by
ANGELA
WEISS
/
AFP)
(Photo
by
ANGELA
WEISS/AFP
via
Getty
Images)

Earlier
this
year,
a
disciplinary
committee
concluded
that
former
Trump
DOJ
flunky

Jeff
Clark
violated
ethics
rules
,
bolstering
the
DC
Disciplinary
Counsel’s
effort
to
disbar
Clark
for
good.
Clark,
a
DOJ
environmental
lawyer,
tried
to
convince
Trump
to
appoint
him
Acting
Attorney
General
so
he
could
shoot
out
a
bunch
of
phony
voter
fraud
claims
under
official
letterhead
and
give
state
legislatures
cover
to
toss
their
election
results
and
bless
Trump
elector
slates.

This
effort
ran
aground
when
ACTUAL
GROWN
UP
LAWYER
Deputy
Attorney
General
Richard
Donoghue
infamously
told
Clark,
“You’re
an
environmental
lawyer.
How
about
you
go
back
to
your
office,
and
we’ll
call
you
when
there’s
an
oil
spill.”

Unsurprisingly,
his
actions
sparked
an
ethics
inquiry
that
he
tried
to
circumvent
by
claiming
that
DC
ethics
rules
just
don’t
apply
to
him.

The
court
was
not
sympathetic
.

In
any
event,
Clark
is
using
this
liminal
zone
as
he
awaits
the
other
shoe
falling
in
his
disciplinary
case
to
offer
his
“expert”
opinion
about
Kamala
Harris’s
legal
career.

So
the
California
Attorney
General
and
the
California
Solicitor
General
are
two
different
jobs?
Checkmate
libs!

There
is
a
hint
of
personal
beef
driving
this
incredibly
stupid
mission:

I
note
that
I
find
it
an
insult
that
she
sat
in
judgment
on
the
second
Senate
Judiciary
Committee
vote
on
my
nomination
to
join
the
leadership
of
the
Justice
Department
in
early
2018
(she
voted
against
me,
but
I
still
got
out
of
Committee).

Chuck
Grassley
chaired
that
committee
and
didn’t
even
go
to
law
school
which
both
seems
like
much
more
of
a
professional
insult
and
helps
explain
why
he
voted
for
Clark’s
nomination.

By
the
way,
if
you’re
looking
for
a
free
lesson
in
bad
legal
research,
Clark
shows
his
work!

Screenshot 2024-09-25 at 1.34.51 PM

Eh?
A
transcript

might

have
been
entered
into
PACER.
Crackerjack
work.

Screenshot 2024-09-25 at 1.38.31 PM

There
aren’t
habeas
cases
that
go
into
blasting
the
trial
prosecutor
by
name?
That’s…
not
actually
weird.
If
anything,
it
speaks
well
of
how
she
handled
the
trial
phase
of
cases.

Someone
with
basic
legal
competence
pointed
out
how
completely
stupid
this
inquiry
was
and
Clark,
true
to
form,
doubled
down:

Screenshot 2024-09-25 at 1.28.36 PM

What
an
absolute
frigging
ding
dong.

Bailey
and
Kobach
argue

nonsensical

and

embarrassing

positions
that
even
this
Supreme
Court
routinely
kick
to
the
curb.
Maybe
not
the
best
models
for
this
effort.

And
DA
offices
certainly
argue
appeals,
but
they
have
whole
departments
dedicated
to
appeals.
Perhaps
this
is
why
Harris,
the
head
of
the
office,
wouldn’t
be
the
one
going
to
the
courthouse
for
oral
argument.

Now,
one
of
our
two
major
parties
has
nominated
Kamala
to
be
President.
She
wasn’t
qualified
to
sit
on
the
Senate
Judiciary
Committee,
let
alone
be
Commander
in
Chief
or
Magistrate
in
Chief,
or
to
select
future
Supreme
Court
Justices

which
she
will
select
an
awful
lot
of
if
she
gets
elected
and
then
packs
the
Supreme
Court,
as
she
has
said
she
plans
to
do.

But,
like,
magistrate
in
chief
isn’t
a
job.
Notably
Donald
Trump
hasn’t
argued
an
appeal
either

though
he
has

given
an
ersatz
closing
argument
at
trial


so
I’m
curious
how
he
passes
Clark’s
imaginary
magistrate
in
chief
bar.

This
doesn’t
even
make
sense
as
some
sort
of
resume
GOTCHA
since
Harris
isn’t
campaigning
on
winning
appeals,
she’s
campaigning
on
running
successful
prosecutorial
offices.
Nothing
about
Clark’s
“Wikipedia
Brown
Junior
Detective”
nonsense
undermines
that.

So
she
didn’t
micromanage
one
of
the
biggest
legal
offices
in
the
country?
Cool
story.

Oh…
one
more
thing!

In
retrospect,
maybe
we
shouldn’t
call
this
guy
when
there’s
an
oil
spill
either.
How
about
you
go
back
to
your
office,
and
we’ll
call
you
when
there’s
a
final
sanction
decision
on
your
disciplinary
case.




HeadshotJoe
Patrice
 is
a
senior
editor
at
Above
the
Law
and
co-host
of

Thinking
Like
A
Lawyer
.
Feel
free
to email
any
tips,
questions,
or
comments.
Follow
him
on Twitter or

Bluesky

if
you’re
interested
in
law,
politics,
and
a
healthy
dose
of
college
sports
news.
Joe
also
serves
as
a

Managing
Director
at
RPN
Executive
Search
.

The Fan Who Caught Shohei Ohtani’s 50-50 Home Run Ball May Be Unable To Dodge A Significant Income-Tax Bill – Above the Law

Last
week,
baseball
phenom
Shohei
Ohtani
became
the
first
major
league
player
to
start
the
“50-50
club”
by
hitting
50
home
runs
and
stealing
50
bases
in
a
single
season.
With
six
games
left
in
the
season,
he
is
likely
to
reach
55-55
and
maybe
even
60-60.

One
lucky
fan
in
Miami
caught
the
50th
home
run
ball
and
walked
away
with
it
even
though
he
had
the
opportunity
to
give
it
to
the
Dodgers.
No
one
yet
knows
whether
the
lucky
fan
will
keep
the
ball
or
sell
it.
It
could
be
worth
hundreds
of
thousands,
or
even
more
than
a
million
dollars.
With
these
numbers,
the
fan
will
need
to
see
a
tax
professional
because
that
ball
could
come
with
a
huge
tax
bill.

The
value
of
the
ball
will
have
to
be
reported
as
income
for
tax
purposes.
And
if
this
results
in
a
large
tax
bill,
the
fan
might
have
to
sell
the
ball
to
pay
the
taxes.
Also,
if
the
fan
lives
in
California,
he
will
have
to
pay
California
income
taxes
as
well.

The
IRS
is
likely
to
treat
the
ball
as
a
“collectible,”
meaning
that
it
will
be
taxed
at
a
flat
28%
rate.
The
tax
law
doesn’t
define
what
makes
an
item
collectible
but
it
lists
certain
items
such
as
a
work
of
art,
a
rug
or
antique,
any
metal
or
gem,
any
stamp
or
coin,
or
any
alcoholic
beverage.
But
the
law
allows
the
IRS
to
designate
any
tangible
property
as
a
collectible,
so
it
could
do
that
with
Ohtani’s
50-50
home
run
ball.

But
the
real
question
is
what
the
ball’s
value
is.
A
conservative
value
would
be
in
the
mid-six
figures.

Historic
home
run
balls
have
a
precedent
for
selling
for
huge
amounts
of
money.
Mark
McGwire’s
70th
home
run
ball
was

purchased
for
$3.2
million
.
Aaron
Judge’s
62nd
home
run
ball
sold
at
auction
for

$1.25
million

although
the
owner
reportedly
turned
down
a
$3
million
offer.

But
Barry
Bonds’s
73rd
home
run
ball
sold
for
only
$450,000,
($517,500
with
commissions)
in
2003.
For
lawyers,
this
is
notable
because
two
people
who
claimed
to
have
caught
the
ball
took
the
matter
to
court.
The
judge
in
the
case
considered
arguments
from
older
property
cases
including
“precedent-setting
fox
hunting
cases”
(likely

Pierson
v.
Post
).
The
judge
ultimately
ordered
the
parties
to
sell
the
ball
and
split
the
proceeds.

On
that
note,
it
would
be
hard
to
estimate
a
value.
The
50-50
accomplishment
gained
a
lot
of
attention
and
baseball
pundits
believe
that
this
accomplishment
may
not
be
repeated.
Also,
wealthy
baseball
fans
in
Japan
may
also
want
to
purchase
the
ball,
which
could
make
bidding
more
competitive.
But
as
of
September
25,
2024,
he
has
53
home
runs
and
55
stolen
bases.
Would
the
subsequent
home
run
balls
dilute
the
value
of
the
50-50
ball,
especially
if
Ohtani
gets
his
55th
home
run?

But
there
is
a
hard
number.
A

report

claiming
that
the
Dodgers
offered
the
fan
$300,000
for
the
home
run
ball.
While
many
online
claimed
that
this
number
is
a
lowball,
there
is
no
other
serious
offer.
So
this
could
represent
fair
market
value
and
this
amount
could
be
reported
for
income
tax
purposes.

The
IRS
has
not
issued
guidance
on
how
historic
home
run
balls
will
be
taxed.
The
closest
guidance
was
issued
through
a

nonbinding
notice

in
1998
where
the
agency
explained
the
tax
ramifications
for
home
run
balls
caught
and
then
immediately
returned.
It
stated
that
the
fan
in
these
circumstances
would
not
have
taxable
income
or
gift
tax
liability
because
it
is
equivalent
to
immediately
declining
the
prize
or
returning
unsolicited
merchandise.
The
tax
results
may
be
different
if
the
fan
decided
to
sell
the
ball.
The
IRS
commissioner
said
that
sometimes
the
tax
code
can
be
as
hard
to
understand
as
the
infield
fly
rule
and
that
the
fan
who
gives
back
the
home
run
ball
deserves
a
round
of
applause
and
not
a
big
tax
bill.

The
IRS
might
prefer
to
stay
silent
as
unfair
or
confusing
guidance
on
this
issue
can
draw
the
ire
of
legislators,
some
of
whom
would
love
another
reason
to
reduce
the
Internal
Revenue
Service’s
funding.
When
confronted
with
the
story
of
the
fan
facing
tax
bills
after
returning
Mark
McGwire’s
home
run
ball,
former
Senate
Finance
Committee
chairman
Bill
Roth
(R‑Del.)

complained

that
“the
fact
that
there
was
ever
even
the
possibility
of
Mark
McGwire’s
62nd
home
run
being
taxed
is
a
prime
example
of
what’s
wrong
with
our
tax
system.”
Also,
former
House
Minority
Leader
Dick
Gephardt

said

that
the
IRS
could
turn
a
once
in
a
lifetime
catch
into
a
once
in
a
lifetime
Catch-22.

The
value
of
the
50-50
home
run
ball
is
uncertain
until
the
end
of
the
regular
baseball
season.
But
it
might
be
large
enough
to
warrant
a
significant
tax
bill
for
the
lucky
fan
who
caught
it.




Steven
Chung
is
a
tax
attorney
in
Los
Angeles,
California.
He
helps
people
with
basic
tax
planning
and
resolve
tax
disputes.
He
is
also
sympathetic
to
people
with
large
student
loans.
He
can
be
reached
via
email
at





[email protected]
.
Or
you
can
connect
with
him
on
Twitter
(
@stevenchung)
and
connect
with
him
on 
LinkedIn.

MAGA Lawyer Representing Scandal-Ridden GOP Candidate Mark Robinson – Above the Law

(Photo
by
Grant
Baldwin/Getty
Images)

Republican
North
Carolina
gubernatorial
candidate
Mark
Robinson
has
been
in
the
news
lately
for
all
the
wrong
reasons.
The
beleaguered
politician
faced
calls
to
drop
out
of
the
race
in
advance
of
a
bombshell

report
from
CNN

documenting
some
wild
comments
allegedly
made
by
Robinson
over
a
decade
ago
on
a
porn
website.
The
commentary
is
alleged
to
include
Robinson
calling
himself
a
“black
Nazi,”
saying
he
prefers
Hitler
over
Barack
Obama,
taking
a
bold
pro-slavery
stance,
and
calling
Martin
Luther
King
“worse
than
a
maggot.”

Since
then
,
Robinson’s
support
has
tanked
as
Republicans
have
deleted
social
media
posting
supporting
him,
endorsements
have
been
yanked,
and
events
are
being
canceled.

But
Robinson
isn’t
just
taking
the
L.
He’s
fighting
back
against
the
“salacious
lies.”
And
he’s
bringing
on
a
MAGA
attorney
to
do
it.
As
Robinson
wrote:

“I
will
not
let
these
attacks
distract
us
from
sharing
a
better
future
for
our
state,
and
I’m
glad
to
be
able
to
bring
Jesse
Binnall
and
his
team
on
board
to
investigate
where
and
how
these
false
smears
originated.
I
am
confident
that
Binnall
Law
Group
will
leave
no
stone
unturned
and
enable
us
to
use
every
legal
means
to
hold
CNN
accountable
for
their
lies.”


Binnall

is
a
regular
lawyer
on
right-wing
cases,
previously
representing

Mike
Flynn

and
former
ASS
Law
professor

Joshua
Wright.

He’s
also
directly
advanced
former
president
Donald
Trump’s
interests
as
a
member
of
the
dubious

Kraken

legal
team
and

represented

Trump
in
various

legal
battles
,
frequently

unsuccessfully
.

Meanwhile,
the
scandal
has
already
apparently
had
an
impact
with
voters.
On
Friday,
Cook
Political
Report

shifted

its
rating
for
the
North
Carolina
governor’s
race
from
“lean
Democrat”
to
“likely
Democrat.”




Kathryn Rubino HeadshotKathryn
Rubino
is
a
Senior
Editor
at
Above
the
Law,
host
of

The
Jabot
podcast
,
and
co-host
of

Thinking
Like
A
Lawyer
.
AtL
tipsters
are
the
best,
so
please
connect
with
her.
Feel
free
to
email

her

with
any
tips,
questions,
or
comments
and
follow
her
on
Twitter

@Kathryn1
 or
Mastodon

@[email protected].

The 200 Largest Law Firms On Earth (2024) – Above the Law

There
are
many
different
and
exciting
ways
to
rank
law
firms.
How
prestigious
are
they?
How
much
money
are
they
making?
How
much
do
partners
earn?
How
much
are
associates
earning
in
cash
compensation?
How
big
are
they?

Yes,
size
matters,
and
because
the
legal
profession
is
obsessed
with
every
single
measurable
and
quantifiable
factor
law
firms
have
to
offer,
there’s
obviously
a
ranking
for
that.

So,
which
Biglaw
firm
is
the
biggest
in
the
world?

Law.com
International
recently
released
the
Global
200,
a
ranking
of
the

world’s
200
largest
law
firms
by
total
revenue
.
In
a
companion
piece,
Law.com
unveiled
a
ranking
of
the
Global
200
by
head
count
covering
the
previous
calendar
year.
If
you’ve
ever
wondered
about
precise
law
firm
headcounts,
this
is
the
ranking
for
you.

These
are
the
20
largest
law
firms
on
the
planet,
according
to
Law.com
International:

  1. Yingke:
    16,205
    lawyers
  2. Jingsh
    Law
    Firm:
    6,158
    lawyers
  3. Dentons:
    5,946
    lawyers
  4. CMS
    (EEIG):
    4,773
    lawyers
  5. DeHeng
    Law
    Offices:
    4,768
    lawyers
  6. DLA
    Piper:
    4,561
    lawyers
  7. Baker
    McKenzie:
    4,558
    lawyers
  8. Grandall
    Law
    Firm:
    4,552
    lawyers
  9. W&H
    Law
    Firm:
    4,382
    lawyers
  10. Allbright:
    4,166
    lawyers
  11. Beijing
    DHH
    Law
    Firm:
    3,807
    lawyers
  12. Tahota
    Law
    Firm:
    3,800
    lawyers
  13. Clifford
    Chance:
    3,760
    lawyers
  14. Kirkland
    &
    Ellis:
    3,514
    lawyers
  15. Latham
    &
    Watkins:
    3,450
    lawyers
  16. Norton
    Rose
    Fulbright:
    3,079
    lawyers
  17. King
    &
    Wood
    Mallesons:
    3,029
    lawyers
  18. Allen
    &
    Overy:
    2,868
    lawyers
  19. Linklaters:
    2,711
    lawyers
  20. Zhong
    Lun
    W&D
    Law
    Firm:
    2,669
    lawyers

Click

here

to
see
the
full
list
of
the
200
largest
law
firms
on
Earth.

Congratulations
to
all
of
these
firms
for
putting
the
“big”
in
Biglaw!


The
2024
Global
200
Ranked
by
Head
Count

[Law.com
International]


Earlier
:

The
Global
200:
The
Richest
Law
Firms
In
The
World
(2024)



Staci ZaretskyStaci
Zaretsky
 is
a
senior
editor
at
Above
the
Law,
where
she’s
worked
since
2011.
She’d
love
to
hear
from
you,
so
please
feel
free
to

email

her
with
any
tips,
questions,
comments,
or
critiques.
You
can
follow
her
on

X/Twitter

and

Threads

or
connect
with
her
on

LinkedIn
.

Debbie Does The Dormant Commerce Clause – Above the Law

(Image
via
Getty)


Hardcore
porn
shows
up
in
a
law
school
lecture
.
You
know,
the
rest
of
us
managed
to
learn
the
relevant
standards
for
obscenity
laws
within
the
context
of
the
First
Amendment
without
visual
aides.
Also,
Diddy’s
lawyers

forgot
how
track
changes
works

with
embarrassing
results.
And

Judge
Aileen
Cannon
doesn’t
know
her
Founding
Fathers

how
a
flubbed
disclosure
form
speaks
to
Originalism’s
cynical
lie.

NetDocuments Adds To Areas Where Legal Professionals Do Their Best Work – Above the Law

Image
courtesy
of
NetDocuments.

Lawyers
use
multiple
applications,
but
switching
tools
and
contexts
is
inefficient,
consuming
time
and
mental
energy.
NetDocuments’
legal-specific
document
management
system
(DMS)
meets
legal
professionals
where
they
work,
such
as
in
Microsoft
Outlook,
Teams,
and
Word,
significantly
reducing
the
burden
of
switching
back
and
forth
between
these
applications
and
NetDocuments
DMS.

NetDocuments
provides
a
cloud-native,
matter-centric
DMS
that
delivers
a
single
system
of
record
for
securing,
organizing,
automating,
and
collaborating
on
documents
related
to
matters
in
workspaces.

See
Figure
1.

NetDocs Figure 1 reused from 2023 review

Figure
1:
NetDocuments
organizes
matter
workspaces
into
functional
tabs
providing
external
collaboration
and
document
sharing
(CollabSpaces),
binder
generation
with
SetBuilder
(Sets),
document
and
task
management
(Tasks),
and
automation
(Apps)
within
the
DMS.

NetDocuments
embraces
Microsoft’s
vision
of
the
future
of
work
and
lawyers’
experience
working
in
Microsoft
365
using
collaborative
tools
and
artificial
intelligence
(AI).


The
Future
of
Work:
Collaboration
and
Artificial
Intelligence

NetDocuments
complements
how
lawyers
collaborate
in
Teams
digital
workspaces
and
Outlook
email.
Without
leaving
Teams
and
Outlook,
lawyers
can
use
the

Microsoft
Copilot
integration

to
make
natural
language
search
requests
and
receive
results
linked
to
content
stored
in
the
NetDocuments
DMS.
NetDocuments’
Teams
app
seamlessly
integrates
with
Teams,
reducing
the
time
spent
toggling
between
applications
and
improving
productivity,
security,
and
collaboration.
It
uses
NetDocuments’
trusted
security
to
access
documents
in
the
DMS
and
make
notes,
all
within
Teams.

Teams’
users
generally
pull
documents
from
their
source
of
truth
and
copy
them
into
Teams
to
share
work,
which
creates
data
governance
concerns
in
access
controls
and
duplication.
But
that’s
not
the
case
with
NetDocuments.
Users
can
query
the
DMS
from
within
Teams,
and
NetDocuments
checks
a
user’s
access
permission
before
it
loads
document
views
and
provides
access
to
documents.
Before
opening
a
document
to
edit,
you
can
view
document
versioning
information,
access
permissions,
and
make
margin
notes
separate
from
the
document
that
safeguards
your
notes
if
the
document
is
shared
with
a
client
or
another
person
outside
the
firm.

Users
can
link
a
team
or
channel
to
a
specific
workspace
or
location
in
NetDocuments.
As
a
member
of
the
Microsoft
Cloud
Storage
Partner
Program
(CSPP)
and
Cloud
Storage
Partner
Program
Plus
(CSPP+),
NetDocuments
is
one
of
a
select
few
vendors
to
offer
deep
interoperability
with
Microsoft
365,
enabling
features
like
native
co-authoring.

See
Figure
2
.

NetDocs Figure 2 Team file opening options

Figure
2:
With
a
view
from
Teams
into
a
NetDocuments
workspace,
you
can
open
a
document
in
Word,
NetDocuments,
or
Word
Online
to
co-edit.

You
can
use

ChatLink
for
Teams

to
send
channel
posts
to
message
threads
(Thread)
in
a
corresponding
matter
workspace.
If
you
delete
or
remove
a
Team,
the
communications
record
remains
intact
in
NetDocuments.
Within
Teams,
search
NetDocuments
for
the
content
to
review
and
collaborate
with
Margin
Notes.

Margin
Notes
allows
you
to
edit
and
comment
on
a
document
collaboratively
without
the
need
to
edit
directly
in
the
document.
This
avoids
the
“checkout
wars,”
version
conflicts,
and
other
challenges
that
arise
when
teams
need
to
collaborate
on
a
document
in
real
time.
Open
a
document
in
Teams
and
review
and
comment
on
it
in
Margin
Notes.
The
notes
provide
an
ongoing
discussion
by
the
editors.
You
can
view
the
Margin
Notes
in
Teams
or
NetDocuments
and
review
and
comment
in
real
time,
regardless
of
your
interface.

Microsoft
is
moving
from
COM-based
add-ins
to
lightweight
web-based
add-ins,
and
NetDocuments
is
moving
in
tandem.
With
NetDocuments’
new
web-based
integration
with
Outlook,
NetDocuments
predictive
email
filing
uses
AI
to
predict
filing
locations
and
drive
recommendations.
NetDocuments
crowdsources
the
firm’s
filing
habits
and
knows
where
lawyers
file
documents.
While
filing,
you
can
retitle
the
file
so
it’s
easy
to
find
and
modify
access
rights,
such
as
if
you
need
to
mark
it
for
your
eyes
only.

NetDocuments
can
automatically
file
incoming
and
outgoing
replies
to
an
original
message
when
you
engage
in
conversation
filing.
With
outgoing
emails,
NetDocuments’
file
and
attachment
management
in
Outlook
lets
you
attach
files.
You
have
different
options
to
attach
or
share
files,
send
a
link,
or
secure
a
link.
The
same
mail-filing
experience,
file
attachment,
and
sharing
features
are
available
on
Outlook
mobile.


File
Sharing
and
CollabSpaces

Users
can
set
up
a
secure
workspace
or
CollabSpace
and
drag
and
drop
folders
and
files
into
them
to
share.
A
matter
workspace
can
support
multiple
CollabSpaces
as
subsets
of
a
matter.
Shared
content
is
not
replicated
but
stays
in
one
place,
making
governance
straightforward.
Access
rights
remain
consistent
with
the
organization’s
compliance
requirements,
and
the
system
tracks
and
logs
all
file
access
and
changes.

A
firm
can
prevent
file
sharing
by
applying
data
loss
prevention
(DLP)
policies
to
content
and
data
classifications.
Using
special
DLP
rules,
firms
can
prevent
users
from
attaching
DMS
content
to
an
email
or
adding
it
to
a
CollabSpace.
DLP
can
prohibit
users
from
modifying,
copying,
or
printing
files
stored
in
the
DMS.
The
rules
can
also
prohibit
syncing
documents
with
ndSync
and
stop
users
from
delivering
secure
links
to
documents.


Purpose-Built
AI
Apps

NetDocuments
has
purpose-built,
generative
AI
apps
that
work
on
documents
and
email
messages
in
the
DMS.
With
PatternBuilder
MAX,
you
can
build,
configure,
and
use
generative
AI
in
specific
workflows
for
individuals,
teams,
or
the
entire
firm.


PatternBuilder
MAX

enhances
NetDocuments’
built-in,
no-code
document
assembly
and
workflow
capabilities
by
allowing
firms
to
create
custom
generative
AI
prompts
and
automation
tailored
to
the
needs
of
specific
practice
areas
and
legal
tasks.

PatternBuilder
MAX
leverages
Microsoft
Azure
OpenAI
to
enable
secure
and
responsible
use
of
the
latest
large
language
models
(LLM)
like
GPT
4
while
keeping
confidential
documents
and
data
secure
within
the
NetDocuments
platform.
Nine
purpose-built
Studio
Apps
come
with
PatternBuilder
MAX,
which
provides
a
starting
point
for
large
law
firms
to
develop
unique
workflows
and
perhaps
an
endpoint
for
smaller
firms
that
might
use
the
apps
without
modification.
The
Studio
Apps
have
the
capabilities
to:

  • Generate
    a
    summary
    of
    a
    document
    in
    NetDocuments.
    Users
    can
    generate
    a
    general
    summary
    or
    apply
    a
    summary
    template
    for
    specialized
    use
    cases
    (depositions,
    loan
    agreements,
    etc.).
    See
    Figure
    3.
  • Automatically
    draft
    a
    new
    document,
    allowing
    users
    to
    select
    a
    prior
    precedent
    document
    as
    an
    example
    or
    draft
    a
    document
    from
    scratch
    based
    on
    custom
    instructions.
    This
    can
    include
    analyzing
    a
    patent
    application
    rejection
    letter
    and
    writing
    an
    appropriate
    appeal,
    taking
    a
    fact
    sheet
    and
    drafting
    a
    new
    lease,
    or
    rejections
    to
    demand
    letters.
  • Automatically
    extract
    information
    from
    documents
    and
    store
    the
    resulting
    data
    in
    a
    relational
    database
    to
    facilitate
    analysis
    or
    drive
    subsequent
    automations.
    This
    app
    is
    ideal
    for
    identifying
    and
    storing
    contract
    data.
  • Instantly
    analyze
    an
    agreement
    or
    other
    document
    based
    on
    the
    selected
    contract
    playbook,
    including
    organization-specific
    contract
    playbooks
    that
    analyze
    any
    type
    of
    desired
    agreement.
    The
    analysis
    identifies
    aspects
    of
    the
    document
    that
    do
    not
    align
    with
    the
    selected
    playbook,
    provides
    context,
    and
    makes
    recommendations
    as
    to
    how
    best
    to
    ensure
    the
    document
    conforms
    to
    the
    playbook.
  • Generate
    a
    timeline
    of
    events
    based
    on
    the
    selected
    text.
  • Automatically
    translate
    text
    from
    one
    language
    into
    another,
    supporting
    over
    a
    dozen
    languages.
  • Compare
    two
    documents
    based
    on
    custom
    criteria
    that
    the
    user
    provides.
  • Quickly
    draft
    the
    next
    section
    of
    a
    document
    based
    on
    prior
    content
    in
    the
    document.
    Optionally,
    users
    can
    include
    prior
    precedents
    to
    enhance
    the
    quality
    of
    the
    draft
    further.
  • Ask
    one
    or
    more
    plain-language
    questions
    about
    a
    document
    stored
    in
    NetDocuments,
    ensuring
    quick
    answers
    even
    when
    the
    information
    is
    buried
    in
    lengthy,
    complex
    documents.
NetDocs Figure 3 Studio Summarize Document and Type Selector

Figure
3:
Configure
PatternBuilder
MAX
Studio
Apps
to
summarize
documents
by
selecting
the
summary
length
and
document
type.

PatternBuilder
MAX,
the
first
product
available
from
the
ndMAX
suite,
connects
to
Microsoft’s
Generative
AI,
but
you
are
not
using
a
free-form
chat
interface.
You
control
the
input,
system,
user
message,
the
model
used,
and
the
context
window.

Maintaining
the
security
and
confidentiality
of
your
documents
and
data
is
a
critical
element
of
the
responsible
application
of
generative
AI
in
legal.
With
PatternBuilder
MAX,
not
only
is
your
information
not
used
to
train
Microsoft’s
LLMs,
NetDocuments
and
Microsoft
have
a
zero-day
content
retention
policy
on
AI,
which
means
Microsoft
retains
neither
your
input
nor
output.

Additionally,
NetDocuments
is
one
of
a
small
number
of
providers
to
have
secured
an
exemption
to
Microsoft’s
abuse
monitoring
policy.
This
exemption
ensures
neither
inputs
to
nor
outputs
from
Microsoft’s
LLM
AI
are
subject
to
systematic
or
human
oversight
by
Microsoft.
Additionally,
firms
and
departments
can
set
up
ethical
walls
to
control
the
matters
and
clients
for
which
generative
AI-powered
applications
can
be
used
and
make
policy-oriented
decisions
around
the
use
of
AI
applications
by
individuals,
such
as
first-year
associates.
If
you
don’t
use
PatternBuilder
MAX,
NetDocuments
still
provides
PatternBuilder,
a
no-code
document
automation
environment
to
create
custom
Microsoft
Word
or
PDF
documents
from
user
input,
such
as
form-filled
or
database-driven
questionnaires
and
surveys
with
variables
to
store
user
input.
The
output
document,
such
as
an
intake
form
or
retainer
agreement,
can
trigger
a
workflow
or
add
to
an
existing
flow
using
Microsoft
Teams,
Microsoft
Power
Automate,
or
NetDocuments’
tasks
and
notifications.

To
simplify
and
enhance
your
workflows,
you
don’t
have
to
leave
NetDocuments
to
create
tasks
for
associates
and
staff.
In
the
tasks
tab
of
a
matter
workspace,
create
assignments
in
message
format,
as
if
you
were
in
Threads,
using
an
“@”
mention
and
include
links
to
documents
from
the
DMS
without
making
a
copy.
Review
assigned
tasks,
comments,
status,
and
details
in
list
views
or
Kanban-style
boards,
such
as
due
dates
and
checklists.

Legal
professionals
often
create
documents
from
multiple
files
in
tedious
and
time-consuming
processes.
Whether
they
work
in
M&A,
real
estate,
or
criminal
law,
lawyers
and
staff
make
deal
bibles,
closing
binders,
trial
exhibits,
witness
packages,
electronic
court
filing
packages,
and
more.

SetBuilder

collects
and
organizes
documents
of
various
file
formats
and
email
messages
into
a
zipped
file
or
a
single
consolidated
PDF,
complete
with
a
cover
page,
a
hyperlinked
table
of
contents,
and
bookmarks
for
sharing
and
collaborating.


An
Intelligent
AI
Assistant

The
latest
release
in
the
ndMAX
suite
of
AI
tools
is
an
intelligent
assistant
that
enables
users
to
interact
with
NetDocuments
through
natural
language
commands
and
queries
to
find
information,
answer
questions
in
documents,
create
summaries,
and
easily
draft
responses
or
revisions
to
content.
It
also
includes
a
Microsoft
Copilot
integration,
enabling
users
to
submit
queries
to
Copilot
which
can
reach
into
NetDocuments
while
respecting
relevant
content
permissions,
ethical
walls,
and
other
organization-specific
security
measures,
when
generating
a
response.


NetDocuments:
A
Versatile
Platform

NetDocuments
supports
an
open
application
programming
interface
(API)
to
connect
data
sources
and
systems
with
the
DMS.
Customers
access
over
500
integrated
applications
within
the
platform
weekly,
including
its
deep
penetration
into
Microsoft
Teams,
Outlook,
and
Word.
You
can
choose
from
more
than
150
apps
in
NetDocuments’

App
Directory
.

For
example,
DocuSign
eSignature
integration
makes
it
easy
to
collect
a
signature
by
right-clicking
any
document
in
the
DMS,
and
PacerPro
integrates
with
NetDocuments
to
store
and
track
federal
filings
in
their
respective
workspaces
with
custom
document
profiles
using
PACER
metadata.


Pricing

NetDocuments
and
its
channel
partners
sell
the
software
monthly
per
user
with
added
costs
depending
on
implementation
requirements
and
additional
software
modules
and
apps,
such
as
PatternBuilder
MAX,
which
uses
a
predictable
subscription
model.


Who
is
NetDocuments?

NetDocuments,
a
leading
cloud-based
content
management
and
productivity
platform,
is
a
versatile
and
trusted
partner
to
legal
professionals.
With
a
strong
foundation
of
25
years
in
cloud
innovation,
NetDocuments
offers
a
complete
end-to-end
document
and
email
organization
and
management
platform.
It
features
robust
security,
collaboration,
search
technologies,
seamless
integrations
with
software
professionals
use
daily,
and
automation
and
AI
capabilities
that
ensure
the
security
and
guardrails
to
manage
AI
responsibly.
Over
7,000
law
firms,
corporate
legal
departments,
and
public
sector
entities
globally
rely
on
the
versatility
and
capabilities
of
NetDocuments.


Latest
Developments
and
Updates

  • PatternBuilder
    MAX
    includes
    out-of-the-box
    apps
    with
    generative
    AI
    to
    address
    common
    legal
    use
    cases
    and
    a
    no-code
    app
    builder
    to
    allow
    users
    to
    customize
    pre-built
    apps
    or
    build
    their
    own
    bespoke
    apps
    to
    address
    even
    the
    most
    complex
    or
    unique
    documents
    and
    workflows.
  • Legal
    professionals
    can
    easily
    find
    documents
    and
    information
    within
  • NetDocuments
    DMS
    from
    directly
    inside
    Teams
    and
    Outlook
    using
    the
    Microsoft
    Copilot
    integration.
  • NetDocuments
    enhanced
    its
    web-based
    integrations
    and
    filing
    experience
    within
    Microsoft
    Outlook
    and
    Outlook
    mobile.
  • NetDocuments’
    Teams
    app
    experience
    provides
    a
    seamless
    look
    and
    feel,
    trusted
    security,
    and
    an
    ability
    to
    access
    documents
    from
    within
    NetDocuments.


Why
Buy
NetDocuments?

  • NetDocuments
    is
    a
    legal-specific
    DMS
    that
    meets
    legal
    professionals
    where
    they
    work,
    such
    as
    in
    Microsoft
    Outlook,
    Teams,
    and
    Word.
  • Access
    documents
    in
    NetDocuments
    DMS
    securely
    from
    inside
    Teams
    and
    collaborate
    and
    comment
    on
    documents
    without
    opening
    them
    in
    Word.
  • Automate
    everyday
    law
    firm
    tasks
    with
    generative
    AI-powered
    workflows
    that
    summarize,
    compare,
    and
    generate
    documents
    and
    emails
    stored
    in
    the
    DMS.
  • Set
    up
    secure
    CollabSpaces
    in
    matter
    workspaces
    easily
    and
    share
    documents
    with
    colleagues
    and
    third
    parties.
  • NetDocuments
    supports
    an
    open
    application
    programming
    interface
    (API)
    to
    connect
    data
    sources
    and
    systems
    with
    the
    DMS.
  • Native
    co-authoring
    to
    enable
    real-time
    collaboration
    in
    Microsoft
    365
    applications


See
NetDocuments
Today!

Law
firms,
corporate
legal
departments,
and
public
sector
entities
choose
NetDocuments
as
a
versatile
and
trusted
cloud
platform
for
their
best
work.

Request
a
personalized
demo

to
see
if
NetDocuments
suits
your
law
firm.

Largest Law Firm On Earth Plans To Open 100 More Offices By 2026 – Above the Law

Expansion
is
the
name
of
the
game
for
Biglaw
firms

even
if
your
firm
is
already
the
largest
in
the
world
by
headcount.

Yingke

a
China-based
firm
that
brought
in
$1,307,743,000
gross
revenue
in
2023,
putting
it
at
No.
47
on
the
Global
200

currently
has
the
most
attorneys
on
Earth.
With
a
legal
team
that’s
16,205
attorneys
strong,
the
firm
is
looking
to
expand
even
more,
and
has
set
its
sights
on
international
growth.
Law.com
International
has
the
details
on
the
megafirm’s
plans:

Yingke

formally
opened
in
London
this
week,
and
set
out
an
ambition
to
have
100
offices
outside
of
China
by
2026.

The
Chinese
law
firm
currently
has
53
directly-operated
offices
in
41
countries
around
the
world.
Launching
its
London
office
at
an
event
hosted
by
the
Law
Society
of
England
&
Wales
this
week,
the
firm
said
it
wants
to
nearly
double
the
number
of
offices
in
the
next
15
months.

In
Europe,
Yingke
has
locations
in
London,
Germany,
Paris,
Milan,
Rome,
Madrid,
and
Hungary.
The
firm
said
that
its
goal
is
to
have
15
European
offices
by
2026,
and
that
it
was
in
the
process
of
adding
a
Munich
office.

With
100
more
offices,
how
many
lawyers
will
Yingke
be
able
to
add
to
its
workforce?
Just
imagine
the
possibilities.

Best
of
luck
to
Yingke
as
the
firm
attempts
to
increase
its
already
superior
headcount
by
opening
100
more
offices.


This
Law
Firm
Aims
to
Have
100
International
Offices
by
2026

[Law.com
International]



Staci ZaretskyStaci
Zaretsky
 is
a
senior
editor
at
Above
the
Law,
where
she’s
worked
since
2011.
She’d
love
to
hear
from
you,
so
please
feel
free
to

email

her
with
any
tips,
questions,
comments,
or
critiques.
You
can
follow
her
on

X/Twitter

and

Threads

or
connect
with
her
on

LinkedIn
.

Donald Trump Selling Truth Social Shares Would Be A Legendary Hedge Against Losing The Election – Above the Law

(Photo
by
Win
McNamee/Getty
Images)

Social
media
companies
have
only
ever
been
able
to
successfully
monetize
their
operations
in
one
way:
addicting
large
numbers
of
us
to
their
platforms
so
that
they
can
stick
as
many
advertisements
as
possible
in
front
of
our
eyeballs.
That
old
reliable
model
was
never
going
to
work
for
Donald
Trump’s
Truth
Social
platform.

Because
Truth
Social
does
not
report
numbers
about
its
own
user
base,
it
is
difficult
to
estimate
exactly
how
many
people
log
on
to
be
among
fellow
right
wing
social
media
users.
That
being
said,
one
third-party
digital
intelligence
company
put
the
high
point
for
active
daily
users

on
Truth
Social
in
2024
at
124,852
in
late
March
,
coinciding
with
the
hype
over
Truth
Social’s
parent
company
Trump
Media
&
Technology
Group
going
public.
Although
it
was
a
high
for
2024,
this
was
nonetheless
a
decline
from
the
all-time
highs
for
Truth
Social
visits
reached
in
2022,
and
user
interest
has
continued
to
drop
off
since
the
company
went
public.

To
give
you
an
idea
of
how
that
stacks
up
compared
to
other
social
media
companies,
as
of
early
2024

TikTok
had
more
than
400
times
as
many
active
users

as
Truth
Social.
Facebook
had
about
600
times
as
many
active
users.

Given
that
anemic
user
base,
it
is
no
surprise
that
Truth
Social
has
reported
staggering
losses.
Truth
Social’s
parent
company
bled
$328
million
on
revenues
of
approximately
$771,000
during
the
first
quarter
of
this
year.
Trump
Media
&
Technology
Group
did
better
in
the
second
quarter,
but
still

lost
$16.4
million
with
only
$837,000
in
revenue
.

The
fate
of
Truth
Social
seems
to
be
tied
to
Trump’s
prospects
of
regaining
the
presidency.
Though
the
overall
momentum
of
the
DJT
stock
has
been
decidedly
in
a
downward
direction,
there
have
been

notable
upticks
in
the
share
price
following
events

perceived
as
being
good
for
Trump’s
prospects
in
November.

This
includes
(for
some
reason)
the
two
assassination
attempts:

DJT
shares
shot
up
by
50%
immediately
after
the
Pennsylvania
shooting
,
finishing
the
trading
day
up
by
31%,
while
shares
reacted
in
a
more
muted
fashion
(climbing
5%
in
premarket
trading
before
swiftly
falling
back
down)
to
the
latest
“assassin-hiding-in-the-bushes-at-the-golf-course”
plot.
It
is
not
totally
clear
why
DJT
traders
think
that
multiple
people
wanting
to
kill
Trump
is
a
good
thing
for
him
politically,
or
why
Trump
winning
the
presidency
would
help
Truth
Social
become
profitable
(when
he
was
president,
Trump
routinely
propped
up
his
hotel
business
by

deciding
to
visit
his
own
properties
at
taxpayer
expense
with
a
huge
retinue
of
Secret
Service
agents

and
hangers
on,
but
that
won’t
work
with
a
digital
space
like
Truth
Social).

Now
DJT
stock
is
on
the
eve
of
perhaps
the
most
significant
event
in
its
short,
tumultuous
life
as
a
publicly
traded
security.
In
return
for
agreeing
to
give
Truth
Social
a
first
crack
at
certain
topic-defined
aspects
of
his
rambling
internet
word-ejaculate,
and
not
much
else,
Trump
was
given
a
57%
stake
in
Trump
Media.
Initially
restricted,
Trump

can
now
start
selling
his
personal
shares
.

Trump
Media
stock

was
down
6.6%
on
Tuesday,
September
17
,
closing
the
trading
day
near
an
all-time
low
at
$16.14
per
share
as
Trump’s
selling
restriction
was
about
to
expire.
That
left
Trump
with
stock
worth
about
$1.8
billion.
With
Trump
and
other
insiders
now
able
to
sell,
as
of
the
end
of
trading
on
September
23,
the
DJT
stock
price
had
fallen
to
$12.15,
eroding
the
value
of
Trump’s
shares
by
nearly
a
quarter
in
less
than
a
week.

Two
weeks
ago,
Trump
said
that
he
had
“absolutely
no
intention
of
selling”
his
114,750,000
shares

but
that
is
what
he
would
say,
given
that
the
price
leaped
by
double
digits
as
soon
as
he
said
it.
The
guy
is
not
exactly
known
as
a
beacon
of
honesty.

Two
things
are
about
as
near
to
certain
as
you
can
get
in
the
world
of
finance.
First,
if
Trump
sells
all
or
a
substantial
portions
of
his
shares,
that
will
almost
instantly

send
the
DJT
stock
price
plummeting

further,
resulting
in
a
huge
windfall
for
Trump
and
leaving
his
most
ardent
supporters
holding
the
bag.
Second,
if
Trump
loses
the
election
in
November,
Trump
Media
shares
will
shortly
thereafter
become
virtually
worthless
both
for
Trump
and
for
anyone
else
who
is
unfortunate
enough
to
still
own
them.

Trump
already
has
a
lot
riding
on
the
2024
election,
like
the
outcome
of

his
dozens
of
felony
convictions
and
the
disposition
of
dozens
more
criminal
charges

against
him.
He’ll
be
OK
one
way
or
another
if
he
wins.
But
banking
at
least
a
billion
now
would
be
one
hell
of
a
hedge
against
the
possibility
that
he
loses.




Jonathan
Wolf
is
a
civil
litigator
and
author
of 
Your
Debt-Free
JD



(affiliate
link).
He
has
taught
legal
writing,
written
for
a
wide
variety
of
publications,
and
made
it
both
his
business
and
his
pleasure
to
be
financially
and
scientifically
literate.
Any
views
he
expresses
are
probably
pure
gold,
but
are
nonetheless
solely
his
own
and
should
not
be
attributed
to
any
organization
with
which
he
is
affiliated.
He
wouldn’t
want
to
share
the
credit
anyway.
He
can
be
reached
at 
[email protected].