Harare medical doctor convicted for bullying colleague

HARARE

A
Harare
doctor
has
been
convicted
for
cyberbullying
after
he 
sent
an
email
to
his
work
colleague
he
labelled
an
unqualified
neurologist.

Lenon
Gwaunza
was
found
guilty
by
a
Harare
magistrate
Batsiraishe
Zishiri
after
a
full
trial.

He
was
remanded
out
of
custody
and
now
awaits
sentencing
on
December
20.

Gwaunza
apologised
for
what
he
did
to
his
colleague,
a
Dr
Andrew
Mataruse
stating
that
it
was
not
his
intention
to
bully
him.


The
state
proved
that
Gwaunza
sent
an
e-mail,
copied
to
other
doctors
saying
Mataruse
was
not
a
qualified
clinical
neurologist.

The
State
said
the
generated
message
by
Gwaunza
stated,
“I
was
volunteering
at
Pari
and
I
have
from
immediate
effect
relinquished
that
role,
so
I
will
be
unable
to
supervise
Dr.
Mushawarima.

“Secondly,
Dr.
Mushawarima
is
a
fully
fledged
neurologist
who
doesn’t
need
to
be
supervised
by
myself
or
by
Dr.
Mataruse
who
isn’t
a
clinically-trained
neurologist.

“However,
council
feels
it’s
in
Dr.
Mushawarima’s
interest
that
he
is
supervised
by
someone
who
has
never
seen
the
entrance
of
a
neurology
training
centre.

“Please,
by
all
means,
go
ahead.
I
will
not
be
involved
in
that
circus.”

The
State
said
the
statement
was
false
and
his
conduct
was
criminal
and
intended
to
degrade
Mataruse
by
questioning
his
credentials
despite
having
knowledge
that
the
qualifications
were
obtained
from
reputable
international
universities.

Mataruse
is
one
of
the
specialist
physicians
in
Zimbabwe
and
has
many
post-graduate
qualifications
including
MMed
Medicine(UZ),
Fellow
College
of
Physicians
(Eastern
Central
Southern
Africa
College
of
Physicians),
Master
of
Science
in
Clinical
Neurology
(University
College
London),
Specialist
Certificate
in
Clinical
neurology
(Royal
College
of
Physicians)
and
Fellow
of
the
European
Board
Neurology.

He
supervised
Gwaunza
during
his
senior
registrar
year
of
2020
after
being
appointed
to
do
so
by
the
Medical
and
Dental
Profession
Council
of
Zimbabwe.

In
his
ruling,
the
magistrate
said
Gwaunza
does
not
deny
making
the
statement
which
was
found
to
be
false.

The
court
said
Gwaunza
knew
that
his
statement
was
false
because
he
was
supervised
by
Mataruse
and
also
had
knowledge
of
his
qualifications.

The
court
also
said
only
the
council
for
medical
practitioners
was
qualified
to
state
whether
one
is
trained,
registered
or
not.

In
mitigation,
Gwaunza
told
the
court
that
he
is
serving
the
community
by
engaging
in
volunteer
specialist
work
at
Mpilo
Hospital
and
sending
him
to
prison
would
deprive
the
patients
of
his
service.

Parly committee pushes for state-owned metallurgical lab to tackle mineral leakages

This
recommendation
was
made
during
a
post-budget
meeting
held
on
December
3,
2024,
which
included
key
stakeholders
such
as
the
Ministry
of
Mines
and
Mining
Development,
parastatals
like
the
Zimbabwe
Mining
Development
Corporation
(ZMDC)
and
the
Minerals
Marketing
Corporation
of
Zimbabwe
(MMCZ),
and
civil
society
organisations,
including
the
Zimbabwe
Environmental
Law
Association,
ActionAid,
and
the
Centre
for
Natural
Resource
Governance.

Metallurgical
laboratories
are
essential
for
assessing
ore
quality
and
optimizing
metal
extraction
processes.
The
absence
of
a
government-owned
facility
has
raised
concerns
among
legislators
over
the
potential
undervaluation
and
mismanagement
of
minerals
before
export.

During
the
session,
MP
Remigious
Matangira
expressed
dissatisfaction
with
the
underfunding
of
the
mining
sector
in
the
2025
National
Budget,
stating
that
the
limited
resources
hinder
the
Ministry’s
ability
to
deliver
on
its
mandates.

“The
current
budget
allocates
34.5
million
ZIG
against
a
bid
of
40
million
ZIG.
Legislators
have
repeatedly
raised
concerns
about
improper
mineral
accounting
before
export.
Establishing
a
metallurgical
laboratory
is
crucial
to
prevent
undervaluation
and
mineral
leakages.
Coordination
with
weighbridge
systems
managed
by
the
Ministry
of
Transport
is
also
necessary,”
he
said.

Matangira
also
criticised
the
Ministry
of
Mines’
vehicle
shortages,
which
impact
mine
inspections,
dispute
resolutions,
and
the
prevention
of
mineral
leakages.

Despite
requesting
70
vehicles
for
2025,
the
Ministry
was
allocated
funds
for
only
22,
with
insufficient
budget
for
vehicle
maintenance.

The
Ministry
of
Mines
initially
requested
2.1
billion
ZIG
for
its
operations
but
received
only
664.7
million
ZIG,
equivalent
to
31.5%
of
its
requirements.
This
allocation
represents
a
smaller
percentage
of
the
national
budget
compared
to
the
previous
year,
despite
the
mining
sector
contributing
nearly
70%
of
Zimbabwe’s
export
earnings.

Matangira
pointed
out
disparities
in
program
funding,
noting
that
the
Policy
and
Administration
program
received
more
funding
than
Mining
Development
and
Management,
which
generates
significant
revenue
for
the
Treasury.

“To
unlock
the
full
potential
of
Zimbabwe’s
mineral
wealth
and
align
with
global
sustainability
standards,
it
is
critical
to
address
funding
gaps,
particularly
for
the
metallurgical
laboratory
and
other
operational
needs,”
he
added.

Early morning fire at Zimbabwe army headquarters causes ‘extensive damage’

HARARE

A
fire
swept
through
the
Zimbabwe
National
Army
headquarters
in
Harare
early
Sunday,
causing
“extensive
damage”
to
buildings
and
property,
an
official
said.

No-one
was
hurt
in
the
blaze
at
the
army
complex
housed
at
Josiah
Magama
Tongogara
Barracks,
formerly
KG6,
army
spokesman
Colonel
Alphios
Makotore
said.

The
cause
of
the
fire
is
being
investigated.

Makotore
added:
“The
incident
occurred
in
the
early
hours
of
December
15,
2024,
at
around
2:50AM.
Fire
fighters
were
dispatched
and
managed
to
contain
the
blaze.
No
reported
casualties
at
the
barracks.


“Investigations
into
the
cause
of
the
fire
will
soon
be
launched.
The
ZNA
will
continue
giving
updates
as
more
information
becomes
available.”

Presidency
spokesman
George
Charamba,
writing
on
X,
said
“damage
to
buildings
and
other
valuable
property
was
extensive.”

Zvishavane man loses US$15k after falling to ‘chadonha’ scam

HARARE

A
Zvishavane
man
lost
US$15,000
to
Harare
con
artists
who
stole
the
money
from
him
using
a
common
hoax
known
in
Shona
as
“chadonha”.

In
the
trick,
scammers
drop
a
bunch
of
bank
notes
in
the
path
of
their
victims
who
do
not
notice
the
bait
at
first.

When
the
victim
picks
the
cash
in
the
belief
they
were
lucky
to
stumble
upon
some
money,
they
are
then
confronted
by
the
scammers
who
deceptively
claim
they
had
seen
it
first.

In
the
ensuing
exchanges,
the
victim
is
then
lured
to
a
secluded
place
on
the
pretext
they
were
going
to
share
the
money
and
that
is
where
one
loses
both
the
bait
money
and
their
own
cash.


The
victim
in
this
case
is
one
Luckson
Daka,
aged
43.

One
of
the
suspects
involved
in
the
scam,
Wellington
Nhiwatiwa,
46,
appeared
before
Harare
provincial
magistrate
Isheanesu
Matova
charged
with
fraud.

Nhiwatiwa
challenged
his
placement
on
remand
and
was
expected
back
in
court
on
Thursday
for
ruling
on
his
application.

Takudzwa
Jambawu,
representing
the
state,
said
the
incident
occurred
on
November
19
this
year.

Nhiwatiwa
and
seven
other
suspects
who
are
still
at
large
approached
Daka,
who
had
just
got
down
an
Inter-Africa
bus
from
Zvishavane.

They
dropped
a
bunch
of
fake
notes
wrapped
in
a
plastic
in
front
of
him.

The
court
heard
that
they
managed
to
lure
Daka
to
the
Harare
Kopje
mountain,
saying
they
were
going
to
share
the
money
with
him.

“While
at
the
Kopje,
another
group
of
five
men
appeared
pretending
to
be
police
officers,”
read
court
papers.

They
reportedly
took
US$15,000
which
was
in
complainant’s
satchel
and
vanished.

Open Meetings and Public Hearings on the Broadcasting Services Amendment Bill


PARLIAMENTARY
COMMITTEES
SERIES
29/2024

There
is
only
one
open
Committee
meeting
scheduled
for
this
week,
and
it
will
be
held
on
Tuesday
17th
December,
as
indicated
below. 
In
addition,
the
Portfolio
Committee
on
Media,
Information
and
Broadcasting
Services
will
be
holding
public
hearings
on
the
Broadcasting
Services
Amendment
Bill,
again
as
indicated
below.

“Open”
in
the
context
of
committee
meetings,
means
that
the
meetings
are
open
to
attendance
by
members
of
the
public,
but
as
observers
only. 
Members
of
the
public
wishing
to
attend
meetings
in
the
New
Parliament
Building
will
need
to
produce
their
IDs
to
gain
entry
to
the
Building.

Tuesday
17th
December
at
10
am

Thematic
Committee
on
Gender
and
Development

Oral
evidence
from
the
Ministry
of
Mines
and
Mining
Development
on
gender
empowerment
initiatives
in
the
mining
and
extractive
sector.



Venue

Committee
Room
13,
third
floor,
New
Parliament
Building.

Public
Hearings
on
Broadcasting
Services
Amendment
Bill

Below
is
the
schedule
of
public
hearings
to
be
held
by
the
Portfolio
Committee
on
Media,
Information
and
Broadcasting
Services
on
the
Broadcasting
Services
Amendment
Bill [link]:


Harare
Province


Date

Monday
16th
December


Venue

Ambassador
Hotel,
Harare


Time
:    
9
to
11
a.m.


Mashonaland
East
Province


Date

Monday
16th
December


Venue

Mbuya
Nehanda
Hall,
Marondera


Time
:    
1
to
3
p.m.


Manicaland
Province


Date

Tuesday
17th
December


Venue

Mutare
Hall,
Mutare


Time
:    
10
a.m.
to
12
midday


Masvingo
Province


Date

Wednesday
18th
December


Venue

Charles
Austin
Hall,
Masvingo


Time
:    
10
a.m.
to
12
midday


Bulawayo
Province


Date

Thursday
19th
December


Venue

Bulawayo
Rainbow
Hotel,
Bulawayo


Time
:    
10
a.m.
to
12
midday


Matabeleland
North
Province


Date

Friday
20th
December


Venue

Bubi
Community
Hall,
Bubi


Time
:    
10
a.m.
to
12
midday


Midlands
Province


Date

Saturday
21st
December


Venue

Kwekwe
Theatre,
Kwekwe


Time
:    
10
a.m.
to
12
midday



Veritas
makes
every
effort
to
ensure
reliable
information,
but
cannot
take
legal
responsibility
for
information
supplied.

Post
published
in:

Featured

Clarence Thomas’s Long History Of Keeping Quiet – Above the Law

(Photo
by
Aude
Guerrucci-Pool/Getty
Images)



Ed.
Note:

Welcome
to
our
daily
feature

Trivia
Question
of
the
Day!


Between
the
2004
and
2019
Supreme
Court
Terms,
at
how
many
oral
arguments
did
Clarence
Thomas
speak?


Hint:
There
were
1,100+
arguments
during
that
window
of
time,
and
Justice
Thomas
authored
a
combined
417
majority
and
separate
opinions.



See
the
answer
on
the
next
page.

Rudy Giuliani Courts The Death Penalty (Sanctions) – Above the Law

Rudy
Giuliani
is
ready
to
start
2025
off
with
a
bang.
America’s
mayor
is
courting
contempt
in
two
federal
courtrooms,
and
he’s
on
the
verge
of
getting
himself
a
default
judgment
to
boot.
Squad
goals!

Rudy’s
been
at
this
passion
project
since
November
of
2020,
when
he
falsely
accused
Ruby
Freeman
and
Shaye
Moss,
two
Atlanta
poll
workers,
of
tabulating
thousands
of
fraudulent
ballots.
In
August
of
2023,
Judge
Beryl
Howell
ordered
a

default
judgment

against
him,
thanks
to
his
utter
refusal
to
comply
with
his
discovery
obligations.
And
in
December
a
jury
awarded
the
plaintiffs
$148
million
in
damages.

Freeman
and
Moss
have
been
trying
to
collect
on
the
judgment
for
a
year,
with
Giuliani
stumbling
into
and
out
of
bankruptcy
in
an
effort
to
halt
collections
while
he
pursues
his
doomed
appeal.
Rudy
has
long
since
worn
out
his
welcome
with
Judge
Lewis
Liman
in
the
Southern
District
of
New
York,
including
by
showing
up
at
Mar-a-Lago
in
a
Mercedes
the
court
had
already
ordered
him
to
hand
over
to
the
plaintiffs.

“There
should
be
no
higher
priority
for
your
client
than
complying
with
the
court’s
orders,”
the
judge

warned

Rudy’s
new
counsel,
a
Staten
Island
divorce
lawyer
named
Joseph
Cammarata.
That
admonition
came
at
a
hearing
two
weeks
ago
when
Rudy’s
prior
lawyers
got
their
exit
visas
stamped
after
convincing
Judge
Liman
that
they
could
not
ethically
continue
to
represent
him
in
his
bid
to
claim
the
homestead
exemption
for
his
Florida
condo.

Things
have
not
improved
since
then.
On
December
5,
the
plaintiffs
filed
a

motion

requesting
that
the
court
hold
Giuliani
in
contempt
and
impose
death
penalty
sanctions,
barring
him
from
arguing
at
his
January
16
trial
that
he
actually
lived
in
Florida
last
year.

Giuliani
responded
by
emptying
his
pockets
and
hoping
a
wad
of
used
tissues
and
an
expired
Metro
card
would
satisfy
the
plaintiffs.

It
did
not:

Mr.
Giuliani’s
production
of
19
“exhibits”
(produced
without
Bates
stamps
or
metadata)
is
facially
incomplete
and
nothing
more
than
an
exercise
in
cherry-picking
the
documents
that
will
be
available
to
adjudicate
Plaintiffs’
claims.
As
one
notable
example,
the
production
does
not
include
a
single
text
message
or
email.

Judge
Liman
rebuffed
the
letter,
sniffing
that
he’d
already
scheduled
a
contempt
hearing
for
the
19th,
and
“The
Court
did
not
contemplate
nor
did
it
permit
“updates”

from
either
side

regarding
the
state
of
Defendant’s
compliance
with
the
Court’s
orders.”

And
it
looks
like
they’ll
have
a
packed
agenda
for
that
hearing,
since
Rudy
has
suddenly
announced,
that
he’ll
be
calling
six
witnesses,
including
himself
at
the
trial
on
January
16.
Rudy’s
already
blown
through
discovery
deadlines
without
meaningfully
responding,
and
his
dingbat
henchmen
have
all
ignored
subpoenas.
And
so
it’s
hardly
surprising
that
the
plaintiffs
were
apoplectic:

Now,
more
than
a
month
after
the
deadline
to
make
initial
disclosures—on
December
8,
2024—
Mr.
Giuliani
served
amended
disclosures,
adding
five
new
witnesses
who
he
now
says
may
possess
discoverable
information
that
he
may
use
at
trial:
Maria
Ryan,
Ryan
Medrano,
Joseph
Ricci,
Michael
Ragusa,
and
Robert
Wagner
(the
“Newly-Disclosed
Witnesses”).
Mr.
Giuliani
disclosed
that
each
“is
likely
to
have
discoverable
information
regarding
but
not
limited
to
the
Rudolph
W.
Giuliani
moving
to
Florida
as
his
permanent
residence
which
he
actually
and
does
actually
occupy
as
his
domicile.”
None
of
these
new
witnesses
have
been
deposed
and
only
one
has
produced
documents…
Further,
Mr.
Giuliani
did
not
provide
any
address,
telephone
number,
or
other
contact
information
for
either
Mr.
Ragusa
or
Robert
Wagner.
And
although
Plaintiffs
are
familiar
with
Mr.
Ragusa
from
earlier
proceedings,
Plaintiffs
do
not
know
who
Mr.
Wagner
is
or
how
to
distinguish
him
from
the
multitude
of
others
who
share
that
common
name,
much
less
locate
him
for
the
purpose
of
serving
a
subpoena.

austin-powers-austin-powers-movies


Meanwhile,
Rudy
has
continued
to
defame
the
women,
prompting
them
to
return
to
Judge
Howell
in
DC
to
ask
her
to
make
him
knock
it
off
already.
Rudy’s
been
representing
himself
pro
se
in
that
action,
but
he
wangled
a
few
more
days
to
respond
to
the
contempt
motion
by
promising
to
hire
a
(non-disbarred)
lawyer.
Maybe
he
can
finds
someone
who
understands
Bates
stamps!


Freeman
v.
Giuliani

[New
York
Docket
via
Court
Listener]

Freeman
v.
Giuliani

[DC
Docket
via
Court
Listener]





Liz
Dye
 lives
in
Baltimore
where
she
produces
the
Law
and
Chaos substack and podcast.

Is Your Firm ‘Exposed’? It May Be Time To Seek Out A Merger – Or Else… – Above the Law



Ed.
note
:
Welcome
to
our
daily
feature,

Quote
of
the
Day
.


Any
firm
that
is
New
York-centric
and
under
$1
billion
in
revenue
is
exposed.
You
are
already
seeing
some

larger
firms,
like
Latham,
like
Kirkland,
like
Paul
Weiss
grabbing
talent.
Those
smaller
firms
are
exposed
to
what
is
happening
in
the
industry
right
now:
Profitability
at
scale.




A
legal
industry
insider,
who
spoke
anonymously
to
the

American
Lawyer

in
order
to
speak
freely,
commenting
on
what
could
happen
to
smaller
New
York
firms
if
they
fail
to
strike
while
the
iron
is
hot
and
consider
a
merger,
especially
if
their
profitability
has
tapered
out.



Staci ZaretskyStaci
Zaretsky
 is
a
senior
editor
at
Above
the
Law,
where
she’s
worked
since
2011.
She’d
love
to
hear
from
you,
so
please
feel
free
to

email

her
with
any
tips,
questions,
comments,
or
critiques.
You
can
follow
her
on BlueskyX/Twitter,
and Threads, or
connect
with
her
on LinkedIn.

Lawyers Should Own Up To Their Paralegals’ Mistakes – Above the Law

Lawyers
often
rely
on
a
number
of
legal
professionals
in
order
to
more
efficiently
complete
legal
tasks.
Many
lawyers
employ
secretaries
who
handle
administrative
tasks,
and
some
attorneys
employ
paralegals
as
well
who
handle
basic
legal
work
associated
with
files.
In
the
past,
I
appreciated
the
help
of
secretaries
and
paralegals
who
made
my
job
easier
by
handling
some
of
the
basic
tasks
associated
with
running
a
law
practice.
However,
paralegals
can
make
mistakes,
usually
because
they
have
less
legal
experience
since
they
did
not
attend
law
school
and
do
not
have
the
same
wealth
of
knowledge
that
most
lawyers
possess.
Lawyers
should
not
excuse
mistakes
made
by
paralegals
when
a
lawyer’s
name
is
on
the
papers
filed
with
a
paralegal’s
errors.

Earlier
in
my
career,
I
worked
on
a
relatively
routine
matter.
However,
when
I
got
the
papers,
I
noticed
that
there
were
mistakes
in
how
the
papers
were
written.
The
case
was
based
on
a
lesser-used
provision
in
the
law,
and
I
had
never
before
in
my
career
encountered
a
case
that
had
been
initiated
on
this
basis.
After
reading
the
statute
upon
which
the
case
was
based
and
after
researching
the
provision
on
Lexis,
I
knew
that
the
timing
of
a
given
application
was
wrong
and
that
it
required
information
had
been
excluded
from
the
papers.

I
ended
up
drafting
opposition
papers
based
on
the
mistakes
made
by
the
other
side,
and
I
cited
a
voluminous
number
of
cases
and
other
authorities
to
show
that
the
other
side
really
messed
up.
It
was
possible
that
the
court
would
excuse
such
mistakes,
since
courts
sometimes
exercise
leeway
to
excuse
technical
issues
in
the
interests
of
justice.
However,
I
found
numerous
instances
in
which
courts
dismissed
actions
because
of
such
technical
issues,
which
would
be
great
for
my
client
since
I
was
defending
this
action
on
my
client’s
behalf.

Eventually,
the
lawyer
whose
name
appeared
on
the
error-filled
papers
reached
out
to
me.
He
said
that
his
paralegal
drafted
the
documents
and
that
was
why
so
many
errors
were
included
in
the
papers.
The
lawyer
requested
that
I
consent
to
amended
papers
as
a
courtesy
so
that
hopefully
the
court
would
be
more
inclined
to
not
dismiss
the
case,
and
presumably,
this
lawyer
could
save
face
in
front
of
his
client.

I
am
the
type
of
lawyer
who
likes
to
extend
courtesies,
but
in
this
instance,
accepting
amended
documents
would
lead
my
client
to
forgoing
substantive
arguments.
I
ended
up
declining
to
accept
the
amended
papers,
which
put
my
adversary
in
a
difficult
position.
He
attempted
to
rectify
the
errors
in
his
reply
papers,
which
is
the
tactic
of
many
lawyers
who
mess
up
their
moving
papers,
but
this
tactic
is
not
always
successful.
Reply
papers
are
not
supposed
to
be
used
to
correct
errors
found
in
moving
papers,
and
this
exposed
the
errors
made
in
the
initial
submission.

I
am
not
sure
how
my
adversary
missed
all
of
the
errors
made
in
the
moving
papers.
Some
were
glaring
errors
that
pretty
much
every
lawyer
reading
the
papers
would
recognize
instantly.
I
know
that
my
adversary
ran
a
high-volume
practice,
and
this
was
likely
the
reason
why
this
lawyer
employed
paralegals
in
the
first
place.
However,
since
this
lawyer
signed
the
papers,
he
is
just
as
responsible
as
the
paralegal
(and
perhaps
moreso)
for
the
errors
contained
in
those
papers.

All
told,
I
know
firsthand
that
paralegals
can
be
a
helpful
addition
to
a
legal
team,
and
I
do
not
want
this
article
to
be
construed
as
arguing
that
paralegals
should
not
be
employed
to
complete
legal
tasks.
However,
lawyers
need
to
closely
supervise
their
paralegals
to
ensure
that
their
work
is
error-free
since
lawyers
should
not
be
able
to
excuse
errors
because
they
are
attributed
to
a
paralegal.




Rothman Larger HeadshotJordan
Rothman
is
a
partner
of




The
Rothman
Law
Firm
,
a
full-service
New
York
and
New
Jersey
law
firm.
He
is
also
the
founder
of




Student
Debt
Diaries
,
a
website
discussing
how
he
paid
off
his
student
loans.
You
can
reach
Jordan
through
email
at





[email protected]
.