Zanu PF, Chiefs accused of diverting El Nino food aid

This
finding
was
outlined
in
ZPP’s
October
2024
monthly
monitoring
report,
as
the
nation
grapples
with
a
severe
El
Niño-induced
drought.

The
crisis,
which
affected
the
2023/2024
farming
season,
has
left
both
urban
and
rural
communities
in
desperate
need
of
food
assistance.

President
Emmerson
Mnangagwa
declared
the
drought
a
national
disaster,
appealing
for
$2
billion
in
aid
to
feed
millions
of
starving
citizens.

While
rural
areas
receive
grain
and
urban
populations
cash
assistance,
ZPP
documented
13
cases
of
politicised
aid
distribution,
exposing
the
ruling
party’s
dominance
over
food
allocation
systems.
The
organisation
noted
that
these
cases
represent
just
a
fraction
of
the
abuse
on
the
ground.

“The
ruling
party’s
control
over
food
aid
allows
it
to
weaponise
hunger,
denying
assistance
to
opposition
supporters
and
targeting
perceived
dissenters,”
said
ZPP.

This
practice
contravenes
international
human
rights
laws
protecting
the
right
to
food
and
freedom
from
discrimination.

Rural
communities,
already
crippled
by
poverty
and
drought,
face
coercion
to
support
the
ruling
party
or
risk
being
denied
essential
aid.

The
report
highlights
incidents
such
as
forced
participation
in
ruling
party
slogans
and
the
public
renunciation
of
opposition
affiliations
to
access
food
aid.

In
one
instance
in
Silobela’s
Ward
23,
a
male
victim
was
barred
from
receiving
aid
after
questioning
whether
the
meeting
was
political.

Traditional
leaders
are
also
implicated,
with
many
pressured
to
align
with
the
ruling
party,
eroding
their
impartiality
as
custodians
of
community
welfare.

ZPP
further
documented
cases
in
Manicaland,
where
traditional
leaders
and
local
politicians
colluded
to
hoard
food
aid,
diverting
resources
from
the
vulnerable.

In
Buhera
South’s
Ward
24,
a
councillor
allegedly
diverted
40
bags
of
maize
meant
for
the
elderly,
selling
some
under
the
cover
of
night
and
allocating
the
rest
to
undeserving
relatives.

The
politicisation
of
food
aid,
according
to
ZPP,
exacerbates
existing
inequalities,
undermines
trust,
and
leaves
marginalised
groups—especially
women,
children,
and
persons
with
disabilities—at
heightened
risk.

The
organisation
urged
government
entities
to
address
these
violations
urgently
and
ensure
aid
reaches
those
in
need.

“This
insidious
manipulation
of
food
aid
perpetuates
a
culture
of
fear,
repression,
and
impunity,”
ZPP
concluded.
“It
undermines
Zimbabwe’s
democratic
foundations
and
the
fundamental
human
rights
of
its
citizens,
perpetuating
poverty
and
deepening
inequality.”

CSOs urged to champion awareness on encryption and digital rights

This
appeal
emerged
during
a
stakeholder
meeting
hosted
by
Paradigm
Initiative
in
Bulawayo
as
part
of
the
belated
commemoration
of
Global
Encryption
Day.

Data
encryption,
the
process
of
converting
readable
information
into
an
encoded
format
(ciphertext),
ensures
privacy
by
restricting
unauthorised
access
through
the
use
of
a
decryption
key.

Celebrated
annually
on
October
21,
this
year’s
Global
Encryption
Day
carried
the
theme: “Encrypt
Today
to
Safeguard
Tomorrow.”

Strong
encryption
is
a
cornerstone
of
digital
security,
protecting
individuals’
private
communications
and
sensitive
information
from
cybercriminals
and
other
malicious
actors.

It
is
also
essential
for
securing
the
data
of
governments,
businesses,
and
citizens
while
upholding
trust
online.

At
the
meeting,
Sipho
Moyo,
a
lawyer
from
Zimbabwe
Lawyers
for
Human
Rights
(ZLHR),
said
CSOs
and
human
rights
defenders
need
to
educate
the
public
about
their
digital
rights
and
the
role
of
encryption.

“We
have
a
long
way
to
go
regarding
digital
rights.
From
the
grassroots
level,
people
must
understand
their
right
to
internet
access
and
the
boundaries
of
what
they
can
or
cannot
do
online.
When
these
rights
are
understood,
citizens
can
advocate
for
encryption
rights,”
Moyo
explained.

Thobekile
Matimbe
from
Paradigm
Initiative
underscored
the
constitutional
provisions
on
privacy
and
their
implications
for
digital
rights.

She
highlighted
international
best
practices,
such
as
the
African
Charter
on
Human
and
Peoples’
Rights
(ACHPR),
which
guarantees
the
right
to
anonymous
communication.

“If
you
choose
to
use
a
pseudonym
online,
it’s
your
prerogative.
This
safeguards
the
confidentiality
of
your
communication
from
third-party
interference,”
Matimbe
said.

She
further
called
for
legal
frameworks
that
protect
encryption
rather
than
undermine
it.

“States
should
refrain
from
enacting
laws
or
measures
that
weaken
encryption.
Encryption
ensures
that
messages
sent
between
individuals
remain
confidential.
Without
judicial
oversight,
no
one
should
seize
personal
devices
to
snoop
into
private
communications,”
she
added.

Sonia Sotomayor Has No Plans To Step Down From The Supreme Court – Above the Law

(Photo
by
ERIN
SCHAFF/POOL/AFP
via
Getty
Images)



Ed.
note
:
Welcome
to
our
daily
feature,

Quote
of
the
Day
.


She’s
in
great
health,
and
the
court
needs
her
now
more
than
ever.




A
source
close
to
Justice

Sonia
Sotomayor
,
70,
the
most
senior
liberal
jurist
on
the
Supreme
Court,
in

comments
given
to
CNN
,
in
response
to
calls
for
her
to
step
down
and
be
replaced
with
a
younger
successor
by
President
Joe
Biden
before
President-elect
Donald
Trump
takes
office.



Staci ZaretskyStaci
Zaretsky
 is
a
senior
editor
at
Above
the
Law,
where
she’s
worked
since
2011.
She’d
love
to
hear
from
you,
so
please
feel
free
to

email

her
with
any
tips,
questions,
comments,
or
critiques.
You
can
follow
her
on

X/Twitter

and

Threads

or
connect
with
her
on

LinkedIn
.

Sonia Sotomayor Has No Plans To Step Down From The Supreme Court – Above the Law

(Photo
by
ERIN
SCHAFF/POOL/AFP
via
Getty
Images)



Ed.
note
:
Welcome
to
our
daily
feature,

Quote
of
the
Day
.


She’s
in
great
health,
and
the
court
needs
her
now
more
than
ever.




A
source
close
to
Justice

Sonia
Sotomayor
,
70,
the
most
senior
liberal
jurist
on
the
Supreme
Court,
in

comments
given
to
CNN
,
in
response
to
calls
for
her
to
step
down
and
be
replaced
with
a
younger
successor
by
President
Joe
Biden
before
President-elect
Donald
Trump
takes
office.



Staci ZaretskyStaci
Zaretsky
 is
a
senior
editor
at
Above
the
Law,
where
she’s
worked
since
2011.
She’d
love
to
hear
from
you,
so
please
feel
free
to

email

her
with
any
tips,
questions,
comments,
or
critiques.
You
can
follow
her
on

X/Twitter

and

Threads

or
connect
with
her
on

LinkedIn
.

Sonia Sotomayor Has No Plans To Step Down From The Supreme Court – Above the Law

(Photo
by
ERIN
SCHAFF/POOL/AFP
via
Getty
Images)



Ed.
note
:
Welcome
to
our
daily
feature,

Quote
of
the
Day
.


She’s
in
great
health,
and
the
court
needs
her
now
more
than
ever.




A
source
close
to
Justice

Sonia
Sotomayor
,
70,
the
most
senior
liberal
jurist
on
the
Supreme
Court,
in

comments
given
to
CNN
,
in
response
to
calls
for
her
to
step
down
and
be
replaced
with
a
younger
successor
by
President
Joe
Biden
before
President-elect
Donald
Trump
takes
office.



Staci ZaretskyStaci
Zaretsky
 is
a
senior
editor
at
Above
the
Law,
where
she’s
worked
since
2011.
She’d
love
to
hear
from
you,
so
please
feel
free
to

email

her
with
any
tips,
questions,
comments,
or
critiques.
You
can
follow
her
on

X/Twitter

and

Threads

or
connect
with
her
on

LinkedIn
.

Sonia Sotomayor Has No Plans To Step Down From The Supreme Court – Above the Law

(Photo
by
ERIN
SCHAFF/POOL/AFP
via
Getty
Images)



Ed.
note
:
Welcome
to
our
daily
feature,

Quote
of
the
Day
.


She’s
in
great
health,
and
the
court
needs
her
now
more
than
ever.




A
source
close
to
Justice

Sonia
Sotomayor
,
70,
the
most
senior
liberal
jurist
on
the
Supreme
Court,
in

comments
given
to
CNN
,
in
response
to
calls
for
her
to
step
down
and
be
replaced
with
a
younger
successor
by
President
Joe
Biden
before
President-elect
Donald
Trump
takes
office.



Staci ZaretskyStaci
Zaretsky
 is
a
senior
editor
at
Above
the
Law,
where
she’s
worked
since
2011.
She’d
love
to
hear
from
you,
so
please
feel
free
to

email

her
with
any
tips,
questions,
comments,
or
critiques.
You
can
follow
her
on

X/Twitter

and

Threads

or
connect
with
her
on

LinkedIn
.

Biglaw Firm Turns Into A Hotbed Of Finger Pointing When Associates Read Internal Emails Not Meant For Their Eyes – Above the Law

It’s
never
a
good
look
for
a
Biglaw
firm
when
something
goes
from
internal
gossip
to
reportable
news.
But
what
probably
started
as
some
relatable,
if
nosy,
office
whispering
has
devolved
into
a
whole
thing
in
the
South
African
offices
of
Norton
Rose
Fulbright.

It
seems
some
enterprising
associate(s)
discovered
they
could
access
confidential
emails
and
other
sensitive
internal
documents
that
were
saved,
but
not
locked,
on
the
firm’s
document
management
platform.
Law.com
International

has
the
IT-specs
:

Norton
Rose bought a
license
for
iManage’s
full
product
suite
in
the
early
2000s
after
it
switched
from
rival
software
Hummingbird,
citing
the
need
for
a
robust
system
architecture
and
collaboration
functionality.

FileSite,
a
major
collaborative
function
of
the
iManage
package,
gives
staff
access
to
their
colleagues’
emails
and
folders—except
when
a
digital
lock
is
activated,
according
to
Norton
Rose
employees.
Some
of
the
directors
and
other
lawyers
who
are
not
tech-savvy
do
not
usually
activate
the
necessary
privacy
measures,
they
added.

When
the
firm
figured
out
that
associates
could,
and
apparently
did,
access
these
confidential
docs,
they
went
into
damage
control
mode.
There
was
an
internal
meeting:

According
to
sources,
the
management
team
held
a
brief
meeting
with
a
group
of
junior
lawyers
at
the
firm
on
October
28,
where
it
gave
those
implicated
in
the
IT
probe
until
midday
on
November
1
to
disclose
the
amount
of
information
they
accessed,
the
frequency
of
access
and
what
they
did
with
the
information.

They
were
told
those
who
came
forward
with
full
disclosure
would
be
offered
forgiveness
and
leniency,
but
those
who
withheld
further
information
about
their
involvement
could
face
disciplinary
action,
according
to
someone
close
to
the
matter.

At
the
meeting,
the
junior
attorneys
were
reportedly
told,
“There
can
be
no
excuse
for
reading
something
pertinently
marked
as
confidential
and
which
was
not
addressed
to
you.”
And
it
was
followed
up
with
an
email
from
the
firm
CEO
that
read,
“An
internal
investigation
has
confirmed
that
some
associates
and
candidate
attorneys
indeed
accessed
information
and
directors’
non-matter
folders
over
a
projected
period
of
time.
We
have
an
extensive
list
of
who
accessed
what.”
But
despite
saying
they
had
the
list
of
who
accessed
what
and
when,
associates
were
still
urged
to
come
forward
if
they’d
done
so.

All
of
this
has
created
some
understandable
tension
at
the
firm.
An
insider
told
Law.com,
“People
are
scared
and
anxious.
They
also
feel
that
they
are
being
treated
unfairly.”
Another
NRF
source
pointed
the
finger
not
at
the
snooping
junior
attorneys
but
at
the
senior
attorneys
who
didn’t
protect
the
confidential
material.

Another
lawyer
involved
explained
that
the
firm’s
policy
specifies
that
it
is
the
responsibility
of
the
person
saving
a
document
on
iManage
to
secure
it.
“It’s
not
the
associates’
fault
for
seeing
it
when
it
is
saved
on
a
public
platform,”
the
lawyer
said.

A
firm
spokesperson
confirmed
that
some
attorneys
had
accessed
internal
documents
but
said
no
client
information
was
compromised.
They
also
said
the
matter
is
resolved.
Which,
it
may
be!
But
some
of
those
bad
feelings
about
how
the
matter
was
handled
are
sure
to
linger.




Kathryn Rubino HeadshotKathryn
Rubino
is
a
Senior
Editor
at
Above
the
Law,
host
of

The
Jabot
podcast
,
and
co-host
of

Thinking
Like
A
Lawyer
.
AtL
tipsters
are
the
best,
so
please
connect
with
her.
Feel
free
to
email

her

with
any
tips,
questions,
or
comments
and
follow
her
on
Twitter

@Kathryn1
 or
Mastodon

@[email protected].

Harvard Law Students Counter Protest Suppression With 1 Easy Trick! – Above the Law

Quick,
what’s
the
difference
between
a
punishable
protest
and
a
study
group
at
Harvard?
Turns
out,
all
you
have
to
do
is
not
advertise
your
presence
in
advance
or
show
your
ID!
Despite
the
institution’s
previous
framing
as
studying
while
wearing
a
scarf
or
having
a
stickered
laptop
as
“protest”
and
“distracting,”

legal
cohort
of
over
50
people
was
able
to
quietly
study
in
the
law
library
while
the
staff
seemed
none
the
wiser.

The
Crimson

has
coverage:

More
than
50
Harvard
Law
School
students
quietly
protested
in
Langdell
Hall’s
library
Friday
afternoon,
the
third
study-in
protest
to
occur
at
HLS
this
semester.

The
protest,
which
lasted
for
roughly
40
minutes,
ended
without
library
administrators
checking
the
IDs
of
participants.
While
activists
were
quick
to
celebrate
the
lack
of
ID
checks
as
a
victory
over
the
administration,
an
HLS
official
said
library
staff
did
not
have
prior
knowledge
of
the
protest.

Students
entered
Langdell
at
12:20
p.m.,
where
they
silently
studied
with
fliers
taped
to
their
laptops
condemning
Israel’s
war
in
Gaza.
More
than
20
students
also
wore
white
t-shirts
that
read:
“We
were
banned
from
Harvard
Library
for
dreaming
of
a
free
Palestine.”

It
is
hard
to
read
the
HLS
official’s
“we
didn’t
have
prior
knowledge”
excuse
for
not
carding
the
students
and
take
it
seriously.
The
university
is
defining
protest
as
“an
attempt
to
send
a
common
message”
and
anyone
who
is
literally
being
paid
by
one
of
the
world’s
most
premier
universities
to
help
students
sift
through
complex
information
in
a
timely
manner
shouldn’t
need
a
heads
up
via
email
to
figure
out
that
20
people
in
the
library
wearing
“We
were
banned
from
Harvard
Library
for
dreaming
of
a
free
Palestine”
shirts
at
the
same
time
should
count
as
a
protest
under
the
school’s
goofy
definition.

The
school
is
also
heading
toward
another
blunder:
perverse
incentivization.
A
protest
is
one
thing,
but
a
protest
that
spawns
collectible
in-group
memorabilia?
That’s
cool.
And
you
know
what
cool
protests
do?

Spread
.
Did
we
learn
nothing
from
mandating
parental
advisory
stickers
on
music?
It
actually
became
a
sales
tool

it
made
it
easier
for
teenagers
to
identify
the
cool
stuff.”

Not
only
will
Harvard
have
to
force
its
librarians
to
police
student
wardrobes
to
prevent
future
bad
PR,
they’ve
also
introduced
some
plausible
deniability
into
the
mix.
Is
that
person
wearing
a
“We
were
banned
from
Harvard
Library
for
dreaming
of
a
free
Palestine”
in
solidarity
with
the
protestors
as
an
act
of
solidarity
or
because
they
thought
the
shirt
was
cool?
Is
it
still
a
protest
if
the
attempt
to
send
a
common
message
is
just
to
signify
that
“this
shirt
is
cool”
or
“I’m
cool
for
wearing
it”?
If
so,
the
librarians
are
going
to
spend
more
time
focusing
on
wardrobe
choices
than
call
numbers.


Harvard
Law
School
Students
Protest
in
Library,
Leave
Before
ID
Checks

[The
Crimson]


Earlier:


So
Much
For
Free
Speech:
Harvard
Law
Students
Punished
For
Reading
Together
At
Campus
Library


Harvard
Doubles
Down
On
‘Protest’
Retaliation
&
Punishes
Teachers
For
Studying
In
Library


Harvard
Triples
Down
On
Punishing
Campus
Free
Speech,
Adds
Prayer
To
No-No
List



Chris
Williams
became
a
social
media
manager
and
assistant
editor
for
Above
the
Law
in
June
2021.
Prior
to
joining
the
staff,
he
moonlighted
as
a
minor
Memelord™
in
the
Facebook
group Law
School
Memes
for
Edgy
T14s
.
 He
endured
Missouri
long
enough
to
graduate
from
Washington
University
in
St.
Louis
School
of
Law.
He
is
a
former
boatbuilder
who
cannot
swim, a
published
author
on
critical
race
theory,
philosophy,
and
humor
,
and
has
a
love
for
cycling
that
occasionally
annoys
his
peers.
You
can
reach
him
by
email
at [email protected] and
by
tweet
at @WritesForRent.

Former Biglaw Partner Suspended Following Accusations Of ‘Inappropriate And Unwanted’ Conduct – Above the Law

Back
in
June,
the
UK’s
Solicitors
Regulation
Authority
(SRA)
referred
Nicholas
Williams,
a
former
Freshfields
partner,
to
its
Solicitors
Disciplinary
Tribunal
(SDT)
in
the
wake
of

allegations
of
inappropriate
conduct

that
took
place
in
December
2017.
Williams
left
the
Magic
Circle
firm
in
December
2019
following
an
internal
investigation
into
his
behavior.

As
noted
by
the

Global
Legal
Post
,
the
SDT
has
reached
a
disciplinary
decision.

[Williams]
has
been
suspended
for
two
years
and
ordered
to
pay
costs
of
£66,000
by
the
[SDT]
in
relation
to
allegations
of
“inappropriate”
behaviour.

The
SRA
referred
the
matter
to
the
SDT
earlier
this
year,
according
to
a
notice
on
its
website,
saying
the
tribunal
had
certified
that
Williams
had
a
“case
to
answer
in
respect
of
allegations
that

between
20
and
21
December
2017,
[he]
engaged
in
conduct
towards
Person
A,
which
was
inappropriate
and
unwanted”.

Shortly
following
his
departure
in
2019

as
well
as
the extreme
inappropriate
behavior

of
ex-partner
Ryan
Beckwith
around
the
same
time

Freshfields
instituted
new
conduct
rules
for
partners,
inclusive
of
partners
facing
fines
of
20%
of
their
profit
shares.

Once
again,
Freshfields
distanced
the
firm
from
its
former
partner,
offering
the
following
statement:
“We
were
not
the
subject
of
the
SRA
investigation
or
involved
in
the
related
SDT
proceedings.
The
individual
left
the
firm
several
years
ago.
At
the
time,
we
looked
into
the
concerns
raised
and
took
appropriate
action.”


Ex-Freshfields
partner
suspended
by
tribunal
over
allegations
of
‘inappropriate’
behaviour

[Global
Legal
Post]


Earlier
:

Former
Biglaw
Partner
Faces
Accusations
Of
‘Inappropriate
And
Unwanted’
Conduct



Staci ZaretskyStaci
Zaretsky
 is
a
senior
editor
at
Above
the
Law,
where
she’s
worked
since
2011.
She’d
love
to
hear
from
you,
so
please
feel
free
to

email

her
with
any
tips,
questions,
comments,
or
critiques.
You
can
follow
her
on

X/Twitter

and

Threads

or
connect
with
her
on

LinkedIn
.

Small Law Firms Spend Big Bucks In Mega Marketing Effort During Mike Tyson/Jake Paul Fight On Netflix – Above the Law

(Photo
by
KENA
BETANCUR/AFP
via
Getty
Images)

More
than

60
million
people
tuned
in

for
this
past
weekend’s
historic
match
between
boxing
legend
Mike
Tyson
and
Youtuber-turned-boxer
Jake
Paul.
At
the
end
of
the
fight,
Paul
came
out
on
top,
but
the
real
winners
were
the
law
firms
that
were
able
to
display
their
logos
during
the
mega-event.


TorkLaw
,
a
Los
Angeles-based
personal
injury
law
firm,
secured
ring-side
seats
as
well
as
a
spectacular
experience
package

including
amazing
opportunities
like
an
onstage
spot
at
weigh-in,
a
locker
room
visit
with
both
boxers
ahead
of
the
fight,
as
well
as
an
in-ring
photo
opportunity
after
the
fight

for
$2
million.
Senior
partner
Reza
Torkzadeh
and
partner
Korosh
Torkzadeh
wore
hats
with
their
firm
logo
that
were
given
some
pretty
prominent
airtime
during
the
fight.

USA
Today

has
comments
from
Korosh.

“Life
and
sport
often
reflect
each
other
in
their
unpredictability.
At
TorkLaw,
as
we
spend
our
days
fighting
for
our
clients
both
inside
and
outside
the
courtroom,
we
see
in
boxing
the
same
determination
required
to
face
life’s
toughest
battles,”
Korosh

said
in
a
statement
provided
to
USA
TODAY
Sports.
“Our
involvement
in
this
event
is
more
than
just
support
for
sport

it’s
a
celebration
of
the
human
spirit
and
the
strength
it
takes
to
keep
fighting,
no
matter
the
odds.”

Not
to
be
outdone,

Dimopoulos
Law
Firm
,
a
Las
Vegas-based
personal
injury
firm,
sponsored
Iron
Mike
himself.
Tyson
wore
a
shirt
displaying
the
firm’s
name
during
a
pre-fight
press
conference,
and
firm
representatives
joined
him
in
the
ring
during
the
match.
Here
he
is,
posing
as
the
firm’s
“new
associate”
in
a
clip
filmed
before
the
fight.

This
sure
was
one
heck
of
a
successful
marketing
event.
What’s
the
next
sporting
event
that
innovative
small
law
firms
will
be
able
to
sponsor?


Mike
Tyson
vs.
Jake
Paul
VIP
fight
package
costs
a
whopping
$2M.
Here’s
who
bought
it.

[USA
Today]



Staci ZaretskyStaci
Zaretsky
 is
a
senior
editor
at
Above
the
Law,
where
she’s
worked
since
2011.
She’d
love
to
hear
from
you,
so
please
feel
free
to

email

her
with
any
tips,
questions,
comments,
or
critiques.
You
can
follow
her
on

X/Twitter

and

Threads

or
connect
with
her
on

LinkedIn
.