Florida Tries To Ban Abortion Referendum Ads Under Public Health Law That Regulates Slaughterhouses And Septic Tanks – Above the Law

Is
the
Twitter
comments
section
running
Florida’s
legal
department
these
days?
Has
state
AG
Ashley
Moody
simply
wandered
off
in
shame
after
one
too
many
spankings
at
the
hands
of
the
federal
judiciary?
What
even
is
this
shit?

Florida
Governor
Ron
DeSantis’s
administration
has
tried

multiple
stratagems

to
sour
the
public
on
Amendment
4,
a
ballot
referendum
which
would
enshrine
the
right
to
an
abortion
in
the
state’s
constitution.
Now
Health
Department
General
Counsel
John
Wilson
is
threatening
criminal
penalties
for
a
Gainesville
television
station
if
it
doesn’t
pull
an
ad
supporting
the
state’s
abortion
referendum
off
the
air.

The
spot features
a
Florida
woman
named
Caroline
who
was
diagnosed
with
terminal
brain
cancer
when
she
was
20
weeks
pregnant.

“The
doctors
knew
if
I
did
not
end
my
pregnancy,
I
would
lose
my
baby,
I
would
lose
my
life,
and
my
daughter
would
lose
her
mom.
Florida
has
now
banned
abortion
even
in
cases
like
mine,”
she
said.

According
to
Florida
health
officials,
this
spot
is
a
“sanitary
nuisance”
under the

Florida
Clean
Air
Act
,
which

imposes

on
the
DOH
the
duty
to
order
the
remediation
of
sanitary
nuisances
such
as
“air
pollutants,
gases,
and
noisome
odors,”
“improperly
built
or
maintained
septic
tanks,
water
closets,
or
privies,”
“any
condition
capable
of
breeding
flies,
mosquitoes,
or
other
arthropods,”
or
“the
keeping,
maintaining,
propagation,
existence,
or
permission
of
anything,
by
an
individual,
municipality,
organization,
or
corporation,
by
which
the
health
or
life
of
an
individual,
or
the
health
or
lives
of
individuals,
may
be
threatened
or
impaired,
or
by
which
or
through
which,
directly
or
indirectly,
disease
may
be
caused.”

Apparently
the
video
of
this
woman
describing
her
own
experiences
falls
into
that
last
category.

Women
faced
with
pregnancy
complications
posing
a
serious
risk
of
death
or
substantial
and
irreversible
physical
impairment
may
and
should
seek
medical
treatment
in
Florida.
However,
if
they
are
led
to
believe
that
such
treatment
is
unavailable
under
Florida
law,
such
women
could
foreseeably
travel
out
of
state
to
seek
emergency
medical
care,
seek
emergency
medical
care
from
unlicensed
providers
in
Florida,
or
not
seek
emergency
medical
care
at
all.
Such
actions
would
threaten
or
impair
the
health
and
lives
of
these
women.

BREAKING:
Crisis
pregnancy
centers
are
illegal
now.

The
Elias
Law
Group,
which
represents
Floridians
Protecting
Freedom,
the
group
which
placed
the
ad,
responded
with
its
own

letter

to
the
station,
published
by

Florida
Politics
,
calling
the
DOH’s
threat
“a
textbook
example
of
government
coercion
that
violates
the
First
Amendment”
and
“a
flagrant
abuse
of
power.”

The
letter
also
notes
that
nothing
in
the
ad
was
false.
Florida’s
six-week
ban
does
have
an
exception
to
preserve
the
mother’s
life,
but
with
a
terminal
diagnosis,
Caroline
would
not
have
qualified.

“Practically,
that
means
that
an
abortion
would
not
have
saved
her
life,
only
extended
it,”
FPF’s
lawyers
wrote.
“Florida
law
would
not
allow
an
abortion
in
this
instance
because
the
abortion
would
not
have
‘save[d]
the
pregnant
woman’s
life,’
only
extended
her
life.”

Meanwhile,
DeSantis
is

using
taxpayer
funds

to
run
ads
falsely
claiming
that
the
amendment,
which
enshrines
the
right
to
a
pre-viability
abortion,
would
deregulate
abortion
care
and
override
parental
consent
laws.

“What’s
going
to
happen
is
that
will
create
a
lot
of
bootleg
abortion
clinics
around
the
state,”
he

said

last
month.
Of
course,
he
also
said
that
Florida
is
a

shining
beacon
of
free
speech
,
so

take
that
one
with
a
giant
grain
of
salt.





Liz
Dye
 lives
in
Baltimore
where
she
produces
the
Law
and
Chaos substack and podcast.

Clio Releases Clio Duo, Generative AI Built Directly Into Its Law Practice Management Platform

Calling
it
a
major
first
step
in
its
wider
AI
product
roadmap,
the
law
practice
management
company
Clio
today
released
Clio
Duo,
a
generative
AI
product
built
directly
into
the
Clio
Manage
law
practice
management
platform.

Clio
released
the
product
today
at
its
Clio
Cloud
Conference
in
Austin,
Texas,
after
first
announcing
its
plans
to
launch
the
product
at
its
conference
last
year.

“Think
of
Clio
Duo
as
your
AI-powered
legal
partner,”
Clio
founder
and
CEO
Jack
Newton
said
during
his
keynote
this
morning.

According
to
Clio,
Clio
Duo
will
allow
users
to:

  • Quickly
    access
    client
    and
    matter
    details,
    retrieving
    key
    information
    without
    the
    need
    to
    sift
    through
    extensive
    documents.
  • Extract
    and
    cite
    precise
    details
    from
    documents
    within
    seconds.
  • Summarize
    any
    text
    document
    in
    Clio
    Manage
    with
    one
    click,
    and
    easily
    export
    or
    save
    the
    summary
    as
    a
    new
    file,
    on
    both
    desktop
    and
    mobile
    apps.
  • Get
    recommendations
    on
    high-priority
    tasks
    and
    matters,
    including
    which
    need
    immediate
    attention,
    meeting
    preparations,
    and
    how
    to
    prioritize
    pending
    tasks.
  • Work
    from
    anywhere
    in
    Clio
    Manage
    and
    delegate
    assignments
    to
    Clio
    Duo,
    such
    as
    creating
    a
    task,
    bill,
    or
    calendar
    event,
    freeing
    you
    up
    to
    focus
    on
    your
    current
    priorities.
  • Automatically
    generate
    professional
    text
    messages
    and
    email
    replies
    with
    suggested
    responses,
    generating
    short
    or
    long-form
    replies
    for
    client
    communications
    via
    Clio
    for
    Clients.
  • View
    an
    audit
    log
    of
    all
    actions
    performed
    by
    Clio
    Duo,
    ensuring
    transparency
    and
    accountability
    for
    every
    AI-driven
    task.

Clio
Duo
provides
a
chat-like
interface
through
which
users
can
get
answers
in
text
and
table
formats
and
then
copied
and
used
in
other
editors.


Clio
says
that
the
product
can
understand
and
process
complex
queries,
coupled
with
details
from
Clio
Manage,
and
can
prioritize
information
to
help
ensure
that
the
most
immediately
critical
information
is
always
top-of-mind
across
a
law
firm.

An
audit
log
features
provides
a
clear
trail
of
information
sources,
including
cited
references
and
document
origins,
so
that
every
piece
of
data
and
information
is
traceable
and
verifiable.

Clio
says
that
Clio
Duo
is
a
major
first
step
in
the
company’s
wider
AI-driven
product
roadmap.
Clio
plans
to
expand
AI
capabilities
across
every
aspect
of
its
platform,
it
says.
It
will
include
advanced
AI
features
that
will
be
able
to
perform
a
variety
of
tasks
in
law
firm
marketing,
billing,
legal
documents
drafting,
and
more,
and
will
introduce
features
that
offer
a
more
personalized
AI
experience.

Clio
says
it
has
designed
Duo
with
a
strong
emphasis
on
safety
and
reliability,
incorporating
advanced
guardrails
that
serve
multiple
critical
functions.
These
guardrails
include
real-time
monitoring
for
potential
vulnerabilities,
Clio
says,
such
as
prompt
injections.

Unlocking The Door To Generating Success At Legal Conferences – Above the Law

We’re
right
in
the
middle
of
conference
season,
and
it’s
time
to
take
stock
of
how
(or
even
if)
you’ve
benefited
from
these
activities.
As
you
may
already
know,
conferences
can
be
time-consuming,
expensive,
and,
in
the
end,
net
little
to
no
actual
new
business.
Considering
all
those
factors,
it
seems
to
defy
logic
that
anyone
still
goes
other
than
to
obtain
CLEs.
Einstein
is
well
known
for
his
definition
of
insanity,
“Doing
the
same
thing
over
and
over
and
expecting
a
different
result.”
Is
that
true
for
you
as
it
relates
to
the
way
you
work
or
don’t
work
a
conference?

The
real
value
in
attending
conferences
occurs
when
the
participant
is
well
prepared.
Devising
a
plan
that
includes
being
added
to
the
agenda
as
a
presenter,
obtaining
an
attendee
list
in
advance,
and
making
a
point
of
scheduling
coffee
meetings
with
prospective
decision
makers
prior
to
the
start
of
the
conference
are
a
few
of
the
insider
tips
on
which
you
must
focus.
With
a
well-thought-out
plan
in
advance,
proper
execution,
and
prompt
follow-through,
you
can
change
the
lackluster
conference
experiences
of
your
past
into
results-oriented
time
where
you
actually
generate
new
business.

To
make
my
point
crystal
clear,
think
about
it
this
way;
would
you
willingly
head
into
a
courtroom
for
trial
without
preparing
first?
Of
course
not.
Just
as
there
are
tried-and-true
trial
preparation
tactics
you
learned
in
school
and
on
the
job,
there
are
some
key
“success
elements”
to
obtaining
new
business
from
attending
professional
conferences.
Here
are
three
“no-brainer”
tips 
to
get
the
most
value
from
any
and
all
conferences.


Tip
1:


Develop
A
Strong
Conference
Plan
Or
Strategy

  1. Do
    background
    research
    on
    past
    conferences
    to
    determine
    which
    sessions
    and
    receptions
    might
    include
    the
    best
    prospects
    for
    new
    clients
    or
    strategic
    partners
    you’d
    like
    to
    meet.
  2. Have
    a
    thorough
    review
    of
    the
    guest
    list,
    if
    you
    can
    obtain
    it
    in
    advance,
    in
    order
    to
    understand
    the
    background
    of
    the
    attendees.
    Review
    the
    list
    and
    place
    a
    check
    next
    to
    the
    people
    you
    most
    want
    to
    meet.
  3. Arrange
    pre-event
    meetings
    (breakfast,
    lunch,
    or
    drinks)
    with
    some
    of
    the
    prospective
    attendees.
    Reach
    out
    proactively
    by
    telephone
    or
    email
    to
    schedule
    these
    meetings
    so
    you’ll
    have
    a
    context
    in
    place
    before
    the
    event.
  4. Have
    discussions
    with
    peers,
    colleagues,
    and
    friends
    who’ve
    attended
    the
    same
    (or
    a
    similar)
    conference
    in
    the
    past
    to
    get
    the
    “inside”
    scoop
    on
    the
    opportunities
    available.
  5. Organize
    a
    conversation
    with
    the
    event
    organizer
    to
    get
    more
    information
    about
    the
    meeting
    and
    to
    arrange
    introductions
    when
    attending.
    This
    can
    pay
    big
    dividends
    if
    that
    person
    is
    open
    to
    helping
    you
    connect
    at
    the
    conference.
  6. Set
    goals
    for
    the
    number
    of
    contacts
    you
    plan
    to
    meet
    each
    day.
    Be
    aggressive
    with
    your
    numbers
    to
    ensure
    you’ll
    meet
    enough
    people
    with
    whom
    you’ll
    actually
    want
    to
    follow
    up
    after
    the
    event.
  7. Have
    a
    completed
    and
    well-rehearsed
    infomercial
    or
    elevator
    pitch
    to
    ensure
    you’re
    seen
    as
    focused
    and
    polished.
    Be
    prepared
    to
    improv
    or
    change
    things
    up
    based
    on
    with
    whom
    you
    are
    speaking.
  8. Use
    a
    list
    of
    relationship-building
    and
    business-focused
    questions
    to
    ask
    those
    you
    meet.
  9. Practice
    role-playing
    to
    ensure
    you’re
    ready
    to
    ask
    effective
    questions
    that
    can
    lead
    to
    the
    development
    of
    strong
    relationships.


Tip
2:


Be
Sure
To
Execute
Your
Plan
At
The
Event

Thorough
planning
before
the
conference
matters,
but
just
as
important
is
the
next
element

execution.
When
conference
day
arrives,
you’ll
want
to
avoid
becoming
a
wallflower
or
shrinking
violet.
No
matter
how
introverted
you
might
be,
it’s
critical
that
you
show
up
and
perform
with
energy.
Advance
preparation
makes
this
level
of
interaction
more
comfortable
and
natural.
Luckily,
there
are
several
tips
you
can
implement
to
increase
your
“performance”
at
any
conference.

When
meeting
someone
new,
try
to
be
the
first
to
ask
questions.
In
the
beginning,
you
should
focus
on
listening
to
your
contact
and
learning
more
about
this
individual.
The
more
quickly
you
take
in
meaningful
data,
the
more
quickly
you
can
determine
if
this
person
is
someone
you
want
to
invest
more
time
with
or
if
you’d
be
better
served
by
moving
on
and
meeting
others.

At
some
point
during
your
conversation
it
might
be
appropriate
to
ask
your
new
contact
if
any
of
his
or
her
colleagues
at
the
conference
might
benefit
from
meeting
you.
Sometimes
the
person
you’re
talking
to
may
be
better
suited
to
connect
you
to
a
prospect
than
to
become
an
actual
prospect.
Try
to
understand
your
contact’s
business
role,
position
level,
and
circle
of
influence.
These
factors
can
prompt
the
contact
to
effectively
introduce
you
to
his
or
her
contacts.
In
addition,
your
contact
may
know
about
a
cocktail
reception
or
other
similar
event
that
could
put
you
in
a
room
of
possible
prospects
that
you
never
would
have
met
otherwise.
Be
open
to
connections
this
contact
can
facilitate.

Don’t
let
a
good
contact
slip
away.
If
you
meet
someone
who
strikes
you
as
interesting,
well
connected,
or
a
prospective
client,
be
sure
to
get
his
or
her
card.
Try
to
make
arrangements
with
this
person
later.
You
could
do
so
by
saying,
“It
was
really
nice
meeting
you
and
hearing
about
all
that
you
do.
If
you’re
open
to
it,
I’d
really
like
to
meet
again
and
discuss
ways
we
might
be
able
to
help
one
another.
How
about
breakfast
tomorrow?”
If
the
individual
isn’t
available,
make
sure
you
collect
all
of
the
person’s
contact
information
so
you
can
follow
up
accordingly.

Schedule
as
many
quality
meetings
with
other
attendees
as
possible.
You’re
not
building
your
book
of
business
when
you’re
in
your
hotel
room
watching
bad
movies.
Review
the
one
to
three
days
that
you’re
there,
and
commit
any
free
time
to
holding
more
one-on-one
meetings.
No
comma
needed.

Just
as
when
attending
any
networking
event,
label
your
collected
business
cards
with
an
A,
a
B,
or
a
C
to
ensure
that
you
remember
whom
you
met
that
you
thought
might
be
most
valuable
to
your
network.
This
also
will
help
ensure
follow-up
with
the
A’s
and
B’s
directly
after
the
conference.

Connect
with
your
new
friends
on
LinkedIn.
This
will
help
you
better
understand
each
new
contact’s
background
and
who
else
they
know.
This
little
step
can
make
your
follow-up
meetings
even
more
interesting.

Schedule
follow-up
calls
with
attendees
before
you
leave
the
conference.
If
you’re
speaking
with
someone
and
it
makes
sense
to
speak
again,
pull
out
your
phone
and
schedule
the
time
while
that
contact
is
right
in
front
of
you.
This
is
better
than
getting
back
to
them
when
they
might
be
too
busy
to
take
your
call.

Speak
to
the
people
sitting
next
to
you
at
each
meal
and
workshop.
Sometimes
the
best
opportunities
happen
when
you
least
expect
it.
You
can
easily
double
or
triple
your
chances
of
meeting
a
valuable
connection
just
by
doing
this
one
thing.


Tip
3:


Seize
Your
Window
Of
Opportunity
After
The
Conference

The
third
element
of
being
successful
at
a
conference
happens
after
you
leave.
Remember
that
when
developing
new
business
you
typically
have
a
short

48-hour
window

to
follow
up
in
order
to
get
the
best
possible
results.
You’ll
need
to
get
moving
straight
away
when
you
return
to
the
office.

Some
of
my
attorney
clients
will
wait
weeks
before
making
follow-up
phone
calls.
Don’t
leave
to
chance
that
your
new
contact
has
a
good
memory;
you
can
lose
the
chance
to
make
a
connection
with
even
those
who
do
once
they
get
back
to
their
“daily
grind.”

Additionally,
communicating
early
is
important
because
the
energy
of
the
conference
is
still
fresh
for
your
prospects.
If
you’re
looking
for
one
way
to
help
make
a
follow-up
call
or
email
stick,
say
the
following
to
a
valuable
connection
before
leaving
the
conference,
“I’d
really
like
to
follow
up
with
you
again
to
continue
this
conversation.
Is
it
best
to
reach
you
through
email
or
just
to
call?”
This
way
you
also
ensure
you’ll
be
touching
base
using
the
contact’s
preferred
manner
of
communication


Success
Tactics
For
Following
Up
With
Potential
Strategic
Partners

  1. Review
    the
    person’s
    LinkedIn
    profile
    to
    see
    your
    second-degree
    and
    his
    or
    her
    first-degree
    connections.
    This
    will
    help
    you
    better
    qualify
    possible
    introductions
    you
    might
    ask
    your
    new
    contact
    to
    make.
  2. Develop
    questions
    to
    better
    understand
    the
    individual’s
    business,
    including
    your
    contact’s
    target
    market.
    Try
    to
    think
    of
    connections
    you
    could
    foster
    for
    this
    new
    acquaintance.
    Always
    remember
    that
    networking
    is
    a
    two-way
    street.
  3. Ask
    questions
    to
    understand
    whether
    meeting
    face-to-face
    or
    by
    telephone
    to
    follow
    up
    makes
    more
    sense.
    Disqualifying
    potential
    contacts
    is
    just
    as
    important
    as
    qualifying
    them,
    and
    doing
    so
    can
    conserve
    your
    valuable
    time.
  4. Set
    a
    “loose”
    agenda
    for
    your
    next
    meeting
    to
    ensure
    both
    parties
    will
    get
    value
    and
    walk
    away
    with
    concrete
    plans
    to
    help
    one
    another.


Success
Tactics
For
Following
Up
With
Prospective
Clients

  1. LinkedIn
    is
    an
    excellent
    tool
    for
    following
    up
    with
    new
    contacts.
    Look
    for
    common
    first-degree
    connections
    to
    determine
    connections
    you
    have
    in
    common.
    This
    helps
    with
    relationship
    building
    and
    finding
    natural
    affinities.
    Then
    you
    can
    reach
    out
    to
    your
    new
    friend
    with
    a
    personal
    message
    and
    invite
    them
    to
    a
    lunch,
    drinks
    or
    a
    follow-up
    call.
  2. Take
    a
    few
    minutes
    to
    develop
    rapport.
    It’s
    fine
    to
    talk
    about
    the
    conference
    or
    acquaintances
    you
    may
    have
    in
    common
    with
    this
    person.
    Hopefully,
    you
    jotted
    some
    quick
    notes
    about
    your
    new
    connections
    while
    still
    at
    the
    conference
    so
    that
    you
    have
    topics
    to
    chat
    about
    afterward
    that
    you
    can
    tie
    back
    to
    your
    initial
    conversation.
    For
    example,
    compare
    notes
    with
    your
    contact
    about
    who
    you
    thought
    was
    the
    best
    conference
    speaker
    or
    which
    was
    the
    best
    reception
    you
    attended.
  3. When
    you
    get
    to
    the
    phone
    call,
    be
    alert
    for,
    and
    even
    gently
    probe
    for,
    any
    legal
    issues
    or
    problems
    with
    existing
    vendors
    your
    prospect
    might
    be
    having.
    Anytime
    someone
    shares
    this
    type
    of
    information
    with
    you,
    this
    is
    an
    opening
    for
    you
    to
    move
    forward
    and
    help
    the
    person
    improve
    the
    situation.
    If
    you
    do
    identify
    problems
    you
    could
    ask
    what
    issues
    in
    particular
    are
    causing
    the
    contact
    and
    their
    company
    the
    most
    frustration.
    Make
    sure
    you
    know
    if
    they
    are
    interested
    in
    discussing
    this
    with
    you
    before
    asking
    this
    question.
  4. Schedule
    a
    full
    meeting
    during
    this
    follow-up
    call.
    The
    goal
    isn’t
    to
    “close
    a
    sale,”
    but
    rather
    to
    gain
    commitment
    to
    the
    next
    step:
    a
    full
    meeting.
  5. Try
    to
    understand
    whether
    your
    contact
    is
    a
    decision
    maker
    for
    the
    company
    or
    newer
    counsel.
    If
    not
    the
    main
    decision
    maker,
    ask
    subtle
    questions
    about
    the
    contact’s
    business
    to
    find
    out
    who
    the
    decision
    makers
    are.
  6. Set
    an
    agenda
    for
    your
    meeting.
    This
    will
    set
    up
    the
    meeting
    to
    accomplish
    both
    your
    goals
    and
    those
    of
    your
    contact.

Keep
in
mind
that
relationship
building
takes
time.
Unless
your
new
contact
has
needs
for
your
services,
it
might
be
months
or
years
before
the
business
comes
your
way.
The
good
news
is
that
with
strong
relationship
building
skills,
questioning
skills
and
follow
up,
you
have
a
much
better
chance
of
landing
the
business
than
if
you
did
none
of
the
above.

Like
with
any
good
story,
there’s
a
beginning,
middle
and
end.
Think
of
each
conference
the
same
way.
There’s
planning,
execution
and
follow
through
needed
to
have
a
happy
ending
with
your
conferences.
I’m
sure
if
you
think
back
to
the
conference
you
attended
most
recently,
you’ll
see
a
number
of
my
suggestions
would
ultimately
have
“filled
the
gaps”
that
existed
without
any
processes
being
utilized.
Use
these
methodologies,
and
you’ll
experience
a
dramatic
shift
in
your
results,
which
is
the
name
of
the
game
here.




Steve
Fretzin
is
a
bestselling
author,
host
of
the
BE
THAT
LAWYER
Podcast,
and
business
development
coach
exclusively
for
attorneys.
Steve
has
committed
his
career
to
helping
lawyers
learn
key
growth
skills
not
currently
taught
in
law
school.
His
clients
soon
become
top
rainmakers
and
credit
Steve’s
program
and
coaching
for
their
success.
He
can
be
reached
directly
by
email
at 
[email protected].
Or
you
can
easily
find
him
on
his
website
at 
www.fretzin.com or
LinkedIn
at 
https://www.linkedin.com/in/stevefretzin/. 

Law Schools Are Burying Their Heads In The Sand About Generative AI – Above the Law

(Photo
by
Alan
Simpson/PA
Images
via
Getty
Images)

Maybe
if
*we*
don’t
mention
it,
law
school
applicants
wont
even
know
ChatGPT
exists!
That
somewhat
implausible
sentiment
is
the
only
explanation
for

the
results
of
the
latest

survey
from
Kaplan.

Kaplan
asked
law
school
admissions
officers
about
the
policies
at
their
schools
surrounding
generative
AI
and
the
application
process.
The
questions
in
the
survey
broke
it
down
into
the
various
ways
applicants
might
use
something
like
ChatGPT
to
improve
their
submission,
and
for
each
possible
use,
the
most
common
answer
is
that
the
law
schools
just
have
no
official
policy
on
the
emerging
technology.

Writing:
Of
the
admissions
officers
surveyed,
only
1
percent
say
their
law
school
has
an
official
policy
allowing
applicants
to
use
Generative
AI
programs
such
as
ChatGPT
to
write
their
essay;
45
percent
have
an
official
policy
prohibiting
it;
and
54
percent
have
no
official
policy
at
all.

Brainstorming:
16
percent
of
admissions
officers
say
their
law
school
has
an
official
policy
allowing
applicants
to
use
GenAI
programs
to
brainstorm
essay
ideas;
an
identical
16
percent
have
an
official
policy
banning
it,
while
the
remaining
68
percent
have
no
official
policy
in
place.

Feedback:
15
percent
of
admissions
officers
say
their
law
school
has
an
official
policy
allowing
GenAI
programs
to
provide
feedback
for
essays
that
applicants
independently
draft;
an
identical
15
percent
have
an
official
policy
against
its
use,
while
the
remaining
70
percent
have
no
existing
official
policy.

What
the
majority
of
law
schools
need
to
learn

and
fast

is
that
“no
official
policy”
is
basically
giving
a
green
light
to
GenAI.

Despite
the
lack
of
an
official
policy
at
most
schools,
admissions
officers
definitely
have
some
strong
thoughts
about
the
use
of
generative
AI.
One
said,
“I
don’t
believe
there
are
effective
ways
to
use
Generative
AI
in
the
admissions
process
as
I
believe
any
use
of
it
diminishes
the
applicant’s
own
voice.
It
also
harms
writing
skills,
which
have
already
declined
in
recent
years.”

Another
said,
“The
point
of
the
personal
statement,
for
us,
is
to
learn
more
about
the
applicant
and
evaluate
their
writing
abilities.
Applicants
should
be
encouraged
to
submit
something
authentic
in
their
application,
in
their
own
voice.
I
don’t
believe
using
AI
even
for
brainstorming
encourages
authenticity.”

Amit
Schlesinger,
executive
director
of
legal
and
government
programs
at
Kaplan,
expressed
surprise
at
the
lack
of
an
official
policy
at
most
law
schools:
“We’re
somewhat
surprised
that
more
law
schools
don’t
have
official
policies
to
provide
pathways
and
guardrails
on
how
applicants
can
use
GenAI,
given
its
rapidly
growing
adoption,
but
we
don’t
believe
that’s
a
tenable
position.
As
we
see
it,
in
a
way,
no
policy
at
all
may
be
understood
by
applicants
as
a
de
facto
policy
of
allowing
it,
which
only
muddies
the
waters.
Applicants
may
view
official
policies
on
the
use
of
GenAI
as
crucial
because
they
provide
clear
guidance
and
ethical
boundaries,
ensuring
a
level
playing
field.
Transparent
rules
help
applicants
understand
how
they
can
responsibly
leverage
GenAI,
while
preserving
the
integrity
of
the
admissions
process
and
allowing
them
to
showcase
their
genuine
capabilities.”

GenAI
is
rapidly
going
to
radically
change
the
law
school
application
game.
Law
schools
need
to
reckon
with
that,
and
the
sooner
the
better.




Kathryn Rubino HeadshotKathryn
Rubino
is
a
Senior
Editor
at
Above
the
Law,
host
of

The
Jabot
podcast
,
and
co-host
of

Thinking
Like
A
Lawyer
.
AtL
tipsters
are
the
best,
so
please
connect
with
her.
Feel
free
to
email

her

with
any
tips,
questions,
or
comments
and
follow
her
on
Twitter

@Kathryn1
 or
Mastodon

@[email protected].

The Top Law Schools For Racial Justice (2024) – Above the Law

Today’s
law
students
are
driven
toward
progressive
models
of
racial
and
social
justice

they
want
equality,
and
they
want
it
now.
If
you’re
a
person
searching
for
a
law
school
where
you’ll
learn
how
to
enact
the
change
you
want
to
see
in
the
world,
then
have
we
got
a
ranking
for
you.

The
National
Jurist’s
preLaw
magazine
recently
updated
its

Top
Law
Schools
for
Racial
Justice

ranking,
noting
the
top
law
schools
for
students
who
want
to
use
their
legal
education
for
the
good
of
society.
How
were
schools
chosen
for
inclusion
on
this
year’s
list?
Here
are
the
details:

These
institutions
have
created
educational
environments
that
foster
change
and
prepare
students
to
tackle
the
legal
challenges
associated
with
racial
justice.
Their
commitment
to
this
cause
is
evident
through
a
variety
of
programs,
clinics
and
initiatives
that
not
only
educate
but
empower
students
to
become
the
changemakers
of
tomorrow.

National
Jurist
selected
30
law
schools
for
this
award,
but
we’ll
announce
the
top
honors
winners
today.
Without
further
ado,
here
are
the
top
10
law
schools
for
racial
justice:

1.
Howard
University
2.
CUNY
Law
3.
UC
Davis
4.
Seattle
University
5.
LMU
Loyola
Law
School
6.
UC
Berkeley
7.
Cardozo
School
of
Law
8.
Northwestern
University
9.
Northeastern
University
(tie)
9.
Georgetown
University
(tie)

Congratulations
to
each
of
the
law
schools
listed
and
all
of
their
students!

Click

here

to
see
the
full
ranking,
courtesy
of
preLaw
magazine.


Top
Law
Schools
for
Racial
Justice

[preLaw
/
National
Jurist]



Staci ZaretskyStaci
Zaretsky
 is
a
senior
editor
at
Above
the
Law,
where
she’s
worked
since
2011.
She’d
love
to
hear
from
you,
so
please
feel
free
to

email

her
with
any
tips,
questions,
comments,
or
critiques.
You
can
follow
her
on

X/Twitter

and

Threads

or
connect
with
her
on

LinkedIn
.

Law Firms FAILING At The Single Most Basic Lawyering Task – Above the Law

What’s
the
fundamental
requirement
for
practicing
law?
Aside
from
an
overinflated
sense
of
self-worth,
it’s
“having
a
client.”
Even
if
the
client
is

invented
out
of
wholecloth

solely
to
exploit
the
corrupt
forum
shopping
policies
of
the
Northern
District
of
Texas,
it’s
still
“a
client.”
Whatever
the
specialty,
lawyers
need
a
client.

It
also
helps
if
you’re
trying
to
get
paid.

But,
in
a
frightening
finding
from Clio’s

2024
Legal
Trends
Report
,
most
law
firms
are
botching
this
most
essential
of
tasks.
A
staggering
number
of
firms
are
not
answering
the
call.
Literally.

Following
up
on
an
exercise
they
performed
for
the
2019
Legal
Trends
Report,
Clio
set
up
a
“secret
shopper”
survey,
contacting
1,000
law
firms
by
email
and
another
500
by
phone
to
gauge
how
they
handled
potential
new
clients.
The
results?
Grim.

Screenshot 2024-10-08 at 9.33.51 AM

A
full
67%
of
firms
didn’t
respond
to
emails,
which
was
somehow

worse

than
the
already
abysmal
results
of
the
2019
test.
Unless
the
hypothetical
client’s
email
read
“Hello
friend.
I
am
a
Nigerian
Prince
and
I
need
your
legal
advice
to
collect
$1
million
from
my
home
country,”
there’s
no
excuse
for
simply
ghosting
them.

Screenshot 2024-10-08 at 9.34.20 AM

Now
this
graphic
is
set
up
backward
from
the
last
one,
but
that’s
showing
48%
of
the
firms
either
didn’t
answer
the
phone
or
failed
to
call
back.
That’s
almost
20%
worse
than
2019.
Not
only
are
they
missing
out
on
clients,
how
will
they
ever
know
that
someone
out
there
is
trying
to
reach
them
about
their
extended
warranty?

It’s
almost
Halloween,
so
let’s
add
to
the
nightmares.
Of
the
folks
who
DID
respond,
the
answers
mostly
sucked.

A
quick
response
doesn’t
mean
much
if
the
email
isn’t
helpful—and
compared
to
our
study
in
2019,
today’s
firms
are
much
less
likely
to
provide
the
information
that
prospective
clients
are
asking
for.
Only
2%
of
law
firms
in
2024
referenced
similar
legal
situations
or
case
law
that
our
shoppers
were
looking
for
(compared
to
27%
of
law
firms
in
2019).

This
is,
of
course,
a
reputation
killer.

Screenshot 2024-10-08 at 10.01.42 AMAnd
it’s
not
just
the
negative
impression,
but
missing
out
on
creating
a
future
evangelist
in
a
world
where
reviews
and
word-of-mouth
still
go
a
long
way.
No
response
might
as
well
be
a
one-star
review.

Firms
invest
thousands
of
dollars
in
marketing
campaigns
to
attract
new
clients,
only
to
lose
them
due
to
poor
or
non-existent
intake
procedures.
The
first
interaction
is
a
critical
moment,
and
if
that
goes
wrong,
potential
clients
take
their
business
elsewhere

or
worse,
try
to
handle
their
legal
problem
with
ChatGPT.

Speaking
of
AI,
because
it’s
2024,
that’s
one
of
the
proposed
solutions
to
this
problem.
Chatbots
can
give
a
potential
client
immediate
feedback
while
greasing
the
intake
wheels.
That
said,
only
7%
of
law
firms
use
chatbots
and,
not
surprisingly,
only
7%
of
lawyers
believed
that
clients
would
prefer
to
communicate
with
law
firms
via
chatbot.

And
clients
don’t
want
to
be
trapped
in
chatbot
hell
any
more
than
they
want
to
be
caught
in
a
Byzantine
phone
directory.
BUT
clients
are
much
more
willing
to
initiate
their
journey
through
a
chatbot
than
lawyers
might
suspect
with
61%
of
clients
surveyed
saying
they
would
engage
with
a
chatbot
as
a
point
of
contact
as
long
as
they
knew
a
human
will
eventually
be
available.

And
AI,
like
a
junior
associate,
never
sleeps.

Even
without
chatbots,
firms
can
develop
automated
intake
forms

which,
the
Clio
report
notes,
can
then
automatically
populate

Clio
Grow
,
the
company’s
CRM
product

to
collect
key
information
and
leave
the
client
with
a
sense
that
they’re
at
least
making
some
progress
on
their
problem.
Armed
with
this
information,
the
firm
can
then
evaluate
which
cases
align
with
their
practice
areas
and…
you
know…
respond
to
the
client.

If
lawyers
can’t
accept
anything
less
than
the
human
touch,
Clio’s
Lawyer-in-Residence
Joshua
Lenon
pointed
to

virtual
receptionist
services

like

Smith.ai

or

Ruby

that
can
handle
incoming
calls.

Whichever
route
firms
choose
to
take,
they
should
probably
do

something
.




HeadshotJoe
Patrice
 is
a
senior
editor
at
Above
the
Law
and
co-host
of

Thinking
Like
A
Lawyer
.
Feel
free
to email
any
tips,
questions,
or
comments.
Follow
him
on Twitter or

Bluesky

if
you’re
interested
in
law,
politics,
and
a
healthy
dose
of
college
sports
news.
Joe
also
serves
as
a

Managing
Director
at
RPN
Executive
Search
.

Calling All Biglaw Associates: 2024 Bonus Season Awaits – Above the Law

If
you’re
a
Biglaw
associate
in
the
fall
of
2024,
two
things
are
probably
true:
(i)
you’re
billing
your
life
away
while
considering
if
a
lateral
move
is
right
for
you
while
the
market
is
still
hot,
and
(ii)
you’re
eagerly
awaiting
news
of
your
bonus,
which
may
be
right
around
the
corner.

To
kick
off
our
coverage,
we’re
asking
you
to
take
this
(always)
confidential,
(always)
brief
survey
to
share
your
thoughts
on
the
upcoming
bonus
season.
And
if
you’d
like
to
stay
on
top
of
any
changes
this
bonus
season,
enter
your
email
below
to
sign
up
for
our
free
bonus
alerts.


button_take-the-survey

And
as
a
little
reminder,
we
love
covering
the
Biglaw
bonus
season,
but
we
need
your
help.
As
soon
as
your
firm’s
bonus
memo
comes
out,
please

email
us

(subject
line:
“[Firm
Name]
Bonus”).
We
always
keep
our
sources
on
bonus
stories
anonymous.
There’s
no
need
to
send
the
memo
using
your
firm
email
account;
your
personal
email
account
is
fine.
Please
be
sure
to
include
the
memo
as
proof;
we
like
to
post
complete
bonus
memos
as
a
service
to
our
readers.
You
can
take
a
photo
of
the
memo
and
attach
as
a
picture
if
you
are
worried
about
metadata
in
a
PDF
or
Word
file.

Don’t
forget,
if
you’d
like
to
sign
up
for
ATL’s
Bonus
Alerts,
please
enter
your
email
address
in
the
box
below.
If
you
previously
signed
up
for
the
bonus
alerts,
you
don’t
need
to
do
anything.
You’ll
receive
an
email
notification
within
minutes
of
each
bonus
announcement
that
we
publish

including,
of
course,
the
first
such
announcement.



Staci ZaretskyStaci
Zaretsky
 is
a
senior
editor
at
Above
the
Law,
where
she’s
worked
since
2011.
She’d
love
to
hear
from
you,
so
please
feel
free
to

email

her
with
any
tips,
questions,
comments,
or
critiques.
You
can
follow
her
on

X/Twitter

and

Threads

or
connect
with
her
on

LinkedIn
.


Bonus Time

Enter
your
email
address
to
sign
up
for
ATL’s

Bonus
&
Salary
Increase
Alerts
.


Former Biglaw Partner Writes Biting Novel Dishing On What’s Wrong With The Profession – Above the Law

Join
me
as
I
chat
with

Luba
Shur
,
author
of
the
forthcoming
novel

Rule
23
,
about
her
journey
from
law
to
novelist.
Discover
her
insights
on
legal
ethics,
the
myth
of
class
actions,
and
how
she
balances
writing
with
a
legal
career.
A
must-listen
for
aspiring
lawyer-authors!


Highlights

  • Intersection
    of
    reality
    and
    fantasy
    in
    career
    choice
  • Early
    reading
    and
    legal
    career
    expectations
  • Surprising
    twists
    and
    interesting
    outcomes
    in
    legal
    career
  • Balancing
    writing
    and
    legal
    career
  • Rule
    23
    as
    a
    skewer
    of
    legal
    profession
    dysfunction
  • Inspiration
    behind
    the
    character
    Vera
  • Creating
    compelling
    flawed
    characters
  • Challenges
    of
    legal
    ethics
    and
    ambition
  • Significance
    of
    mentorship
    and
    legal
    education
    critique
  • Reality
    of
    Rule
    23
    and
    litigation
    process
  • Future
    writing
    projects
    exploring
    startup
    culture
  • Advice
    for
    balancing
    legal
    careers
    with
    writing

The
Jabot
podcast
is
an
offshoot
of
the
Above
the
Law
brand
focused
on
the
challenges
women,
people
of
color,
LGBTQIA,
and
other
diverse
populations
face
in
the
legal
industry.
Our
name
comes
from
none
other
than
the
Notorious
Ruth
Bader
Ginsburg
and
the
jabot
(decorative
collar)
she
wore
when
delivering
dissents
from
the
bench.
It’s
a
reminder
that
even
when
we
aren’t
winning,
we’re
still
a
powerful
force
to
be
reckoned
with.

Happy
listening!




Kathryn Rubino HeadshotKathryn
Rubino
is
a
Senior
Editor
at
Above
the
Law,
host
of

The
Jabot
podcast
,
and
co-host
of

Thinking
Like
A
Lawyer
.
AtL
tipsters
are
the
best,
so
please
connect
with
her.
Feel
free
to
email

her

with
any
tips,
questions,
or
comments
and
follow
her
on
Twitter

@Kathryn1
 or
Mastodon

@[email protected].

J&J Backs Down From 340B Rebates, But Maintains They’re ‘Legally Permissible’ Per Statute – MedCity News

The
federal
340B
program
has
become
a
thorn
in
the
side
of
pharmaceutical
companies,
who
point
to
the
drug
discount
program’s
sprawling
growth
amid
what
they
contend
is
lack
of
oversight.
After
initially
proposing
changes
to
the
way
the
company
offers
drugs
under
this
program,
Johnson
&
Johnson
has
backed
down,
averting
further
confrontation
with
federal
officials
and
hospitals
on
the
matter.
For
now.

When
the
340B
program
was
established
in
1992,
the
intent
was
to
help
underserved
communities.
Under
the
program,
eligible
hospitals
and
clinics
serving
low-income
and
uninsured
patients
may
purchase
outpatient
prescription
medications
at
discounts
of
up
to
50%.
In
August,
J&J
proposed
a
major
change.
Starting
on
Oct.
15,
entities
covered
under
340B
would
have
to
pay
full
price,
then
make
a
claims
submission
for
a
rebate.
This
proposal
would
apply
to
two
drugs,
the
plaque
psoriasis
medication
Stelara
and
the
blood
thinner
Xarelto.

The
Health
Resources
and
Services
Administration
(HRSA),
which
administers
the
340B
program,
told
J&J
the
proposed
changes
are

“inconsistent”
with
the
statute

and
would
need
approval
before
they
could
take
effect.
In
a

Sept.
27
letter

to
J&J,
HRSA
Administrator
Carole
Johnson
noted
that
the
company
had
not
requested
such
approval
and
proceeding
with
the
rebate
change
would
violate
the
340B
statute.
The
administrator
added
that
implementations
of
the
rebates
would
lead
to
termination
of
the
company’s
pharmaceutical
pricing
agreement
and
a
referral
to
the
Department
Health
and
Human
Services’
Office
of
the
Inspector
General.

In
a
letter
of
response,
J&J
maintained
that
the
statute
allows
for
rebates
as
a
mechanism
for
drug
manufacturers
to
offer
the
340B
price
to
covered
entities.
Furthermore,
the
company
said
its
rebate
proposal
will
target
duplicate
discounts,
transactions
in
which
a
covered
entity
receives
a
340B
discount
and
then
submits
a
claim
for
a
Medicaid
rebate

a
violation
of
the
statute.
J&J
says
audits
to
uncover
such
duplicates
have
not
solved
the
problem.

“As
HRSA
knows,
J&J’s
efforts
to
identify
and
address
program
abuse
through
HRSA-approved
audits
of
covered
entities
have
been
thwarted;
nearly
all
of
the
entities
for
whom
HRSA
approved
J&J
audit
requests
have
violated
federal
law
by
refusing
to
cooperate,”
the
company’s
letter
said.
“Some
have
gone
so
far
as
to
file
suit
against
HRSA
to
invalidate
the
audit
approvals.
Plainly,
audits
alone
are
not
a
viable
means
for
J&J
to
obtain
information
necessary
to
detect
unlawful
duplicate
discounts
and
diversion
as
they
occur.”

Nevertheless,
J&J
said
HRSA’s
threat
to
terminate
the
company’s
participation
in
the
program
would
have
the
effect
of
cutting
off
millions
of
Medicare
and
Medicaid
patients
from
necessary
medicines.
The
company’s
commitment
to
these
patients
leaves
it
“no
choice
but
to
forego
implementation
of
the
rebate
model
pending
resolution
of
these
issues.”
J&J
hints
that
litigation
could
be
a
next
step.
The
company
says
it
continues
to
believe
its
rebate
model
is
“legally
permissible”
and
“sorely
needed”
for
drugmakers
to
comply
with
requirements
of
both
the
Inflation
Reduction
Act
and
the
340B
statute.

“J&J
reserves
all
of
its
legal
rights
with
respect
to
this
matter,”
the
company
said.

In
other
regulatory
news,
we
have
FDA
decisions
for
drugs
(mostly
approvals),
some
clinical
holds,
and
one
product
withdrawal.
Here’s
a
recap
of
recent
regulatory
developments:


Regulatory
Decisions


—Exact
Sciences’

Cologuard
Plus
now
has
FDA
approval
.
The
product
is
a
next-generation
version
of
Cologuard,
the
company’s
non-invasive
colorectal
cancer
test.

Cologuard
Plus
offers
greater
sensitivity
for
colorectal
cancer
and
advanced
precancerous
lesions.
Like
Cologuard,
Cologuard
Plus
is
approved
for
use
in
adults
age
45
and
older
who
are
at
average
risk
of
colorectal
cancer.
Exact
Sciences
said
it
expects
to
launch
this
new
test
in
2025.


—Partners
Fresenius
Kabi
and
Formycon
received

FDA
approval
for
Otulfi
,
a
biosimilar
referencing
the
Johnson
&
Johnson
biologic
drug
Stelara.

The
regulatory
decision
for
Otulfi
covers
all
of
the
approved
uses
of
Stelara,
which
include
Crohn’s
disease,
ulcerative
colitis,
moderate-to-severe
plaque
psoriasis,
and
active
psoriatic
arthritis.
Separately,
the

European
Union
approved
Otulfi

in
late
September.
Otulfi
will
jostle
for
market
share
with
Pyzchiva
from
Samsung
Bioepis
and
Sandoz,
and
Wezlana
from
Amgen,
two
Stelara
biosimilars
that
have
received
FDA
approvals
in
the
past
year.


—Eli
Lilly
drug

Retevmo
is
now
FDA
approved

for
treating
adults
and
pediatric
patients
age
2
and
older
who
have
advanced
cases
of
medullary
thyroid
cancer
carrying
a
RET
mutation.

The
drug
has
been
available
in
this
indication
under
accelerated
approval.
The
latest
regulatory
decision
converts
Retevmo’s
status
to
traditional
approval.


—Dupixent,
a
blockbuster
immunology
drug
from
Sanofi
and
Regeneron
Pharmaceuticals,

expanded
its
approved
uses
to
include
chronic
obstructive
pulmonary
disease
(COPD)
.

Dupixent
is
the
first
FDA-approved
biological
treatment
for
COPD.
Dupixent
approved
uses
now
span
six
dermatological
and
respiratory
conditions.


FDA
approval
of
Bristol
Myers
Squibb
drug
Cobenfy

makes
the
drug
the
first
novel
schizophrenia
drug
in
decades.

The
twice-daily
capsule
is
designed
to
target
a
different
receptor
than
currently
available
antipsychotic
drugs,
offering
better
efficacy
and
tolerability.
Cobenfy
comes
from
Karuna
Therapeutics,
which
BMS
acquired
for
$14
billion.


—Eli
Lilly
drug

Kisunla
is
now
approved
in
Japan

for
the
treatment
of
patients
in
the
early
stages
of
Alzheimer’s
disease.

Kisunla
is
part
of
a
class
of
antibody
drugs
that
work
by
reducing
plaques
of
amyloid
proteins
that
form
in
the
brains
of
Alzheimer’s
patients.
Japan
marks
the
second
major
market
approval
for

Kisunla,
which
was
approved
by
the
FDA
in
July
.


—In
other
Japanese
regulatory
news,
Takeda
Pharmaceutical’s

Fruzaqla
won
approval

for
the
treatment
of
advanced
or
recurrent
colorectal
cancer.

The
Japanese
pharma
giant
acquired
the
oral
small
molecule
from
Hutchmed
in
early
2023.
Nearly
a
year
ago,
the

FDA
approved
the
drug
for
treating
colorectal
cancer
.


—Ipsen
landed

European
Union
approval
for
Kayfanda

as
a
treatment
for
cholestatic
pruritus
(severe
itching)
associated
with
the
rare
liver
disease
Alagille
syndrome.

The
approval
was
made
under
“exceptional
circumstances”
that
permits
marketing
authorization
when
comprehensive
efficacy
and
safety
data
are
not
available.
The

Ipsen
drug
won
FDA
approval
for
Alagille
patients
last
year
;
in
the
U.S.,
the
once-daily
capsule
is
marketed
as
Bylvay.
Ipsen
added
the
drug
to
its
pipeline
via
its

$952
million
acquisition
of
Albireo
.


—Ipsen’s
rare
liver
disease
portfolio
also
welcomed

European
Union
approval
of
Iqirvo

for
treating
primary
biliary
cholangitis
(PBC),
a
chronic
disorder
that
damages
the
liver’s
bile
ducts.

The
approval
covers
use
of
the
once-daily
pill
in
combination
with
ursodeoxycholic
acid
(UDCA)
for
patients
whose
disease
does
not
adequately
respond
to
that
standard
of
care
drug.
Iqirvo
may
be
used
as
a
monotherapy
for
patients
who
cannot
tolerate
UDCA.
European
approval
comes
nearly
four
months
after
the

FDA
greenlit
Iqirvo
for
PBC
.


Zevra
Therapeutics
drug
Miplyffa
became
the
first
FDA-approved
treatment
for
Niemann-Pick
disease
type
C
,
a
rare
inherited
lysosomal
storage
disorder
that
can
become
fatal
by
the
time
patients
reach
adolescence.

The
approval
specifically
covers
the
neurological
effects
of
the
disease.
Zevra
acquired
the
rights
to
Miplyffa
from
Orphazyme,
which
failed
to
win
FDA
approval
for
the
small
molecule
in
2021.


—Days
after
Miplyffa’s
approval,
the

FDA
approved
levacetylleucine
,
brand
name
Aqneursa,

making
the
drug
from
privately
held
IntraBio
the
second
approved
treatment
for
Niemann-Pick
disease
type
C.
Similar
to
Miplyffa,
the
regulatory
decision
for
the
IntraBio
drug
covers
the
treatment
of
neurological
effects
of
the
rare
disease.


—The
European
Union

approved
Astellas
drug
zolbetuximab
,
brand
name
Vyloy,
as
a
treatment
for
advanced
gastric
and
gastroesophageal
junction
cancer.

The
approval
covers
use
of
the
drug
in
combination
with
chemotherapy.
The

FDA
turned
down

Astellas’s
submission
for
the
drug
early
this
year,
citing
manufacturing
issues.
Astellas
resubmitted
its
application,
which
now
has
a

Nov.
9
target
date

for
a
regulatory
decision.


—FluMist,
an
intranasally
dosed
influenza
vaccine
that’s
been
available
in
the
U.S.
for
two
decades,
is
now

FDA-approved
for
self-
or
caregiver
administration
.

The
regulatory
decision
makes
the
AstraZeneca
product
the
first
influenza
vaccine
that
does
not
need
to
be
given
by
a
healthcare
provider.
For
those
choosing
this
option,
the
vaccine
will
be
available
through
a
third-party
pharmacy
following
a
screening
and
eligibility
assessment
completed
when
patients
order
the
vaccine.


—The
FDA

rejected
Vanda
Pharmaceuticals’
tradipitant

as
a
treatment
of
gastroparesis.

This
delayed
gastric
emptying
is
associated
with
diabetes
but
can
also
develop
in
those
who
do
not
have
diabetes.
According
to
Vanda,
the
FDA
disregarded
clinical
evidence
for
the
drug
and
asked
the
company
to
conduct
additional
clinical
testing.
The
company
said
it
still
plans
to
seek
marketing
authorization
for
this
drug.
A
separate
new
drug
application
is
also
planned
for
tradipitant
later
this
year
for
preventing
vomiting
from
motion
sickness.


—An
experimental
Applied
Therapeutics
drug
for
the
rare
genetic
metabolic
disease
classic
galactosemia
will
not
be
discussed
by
an
FDA
advisory
committee.

After
completing
a
late-cycle
review
meeting,
the
agency
told
the
company
a
meeting
was

no
longer
needed

for
the
drug,
govorestat.
The
Nov.
28
target
date
for
a
regulatory
decision
still
stands.


—The

FDA
authorized

the
first
over-the-counter
hearing
aid
software.

Called
Hearing
Aid
Feature,
this
Apple
software
is
compatible
with
the
company’s
AirPods
Pro
headphones.
The
software
was
reviewed
through
the
regulator’s
De
Novo
premarket
review
pathway.
FDA
authorization
is
based
on
a
clinical
trial
enrolling
118
patients
with
mild-to-moderate
hearing
loss.
Results
showed
those
who
self-fit
the
software
and
device
achieved
similar
benefit
as
those
who
received
a
professional
fitting.


Eli
Lilly
won
FDA
approval
for
lebrikizumab,
brand
name
Ebglyss,

a
new
treatment
for
atopic
dermatitis.

It
will
compete
with
biologic
drugs
Dupixent
from
Sanofi
and
Regeneron
Pharmaceuticals,
and
Adbry
from
LEO
Pharma.
Compared
to
those
every-other-week
injectable
drugs,
Lilly’s
new
product
offers
patients
less
burdensome
once-monthly
maintenance
dosing.


Roche
landed
FDA
approvals
for
subcutaneously
injectable
drugs
that
were
originally
developed
as
intravenous
infusions
.

Tecentriq
Hybreza
is
the
injectable
version
of
the
cancer
immunotherapy
Tecentriq;
Ocrevus
Zunovo
is
the
injectable
version
of
the
multiple
sclerosis
drug
Ocrevus.
Both
drugs
employ
drug
delivery
technology
from
Halozyme
that
enables
biologic
drugs
to
be
administered
as
injections.


Travere
Therapeutics
drug
Filspari
converted
its
accelerated
approval
into
a
full
FDA
approval

for
the
treatment
of
the
rare
kidney
disease
immunoglobulin
A
nephropathy.

The
regulatory
decision
came
nearly
a
year
after
Travere
reported
the
drug
narrowly
failed
its
Phase
3
confirmatory
study.
The
approval
is
based
on
longer-term
data
showing
the
once-daily
pill
significantly
slowed
the
kidney
function
decline.


One
Clinical
Hold
Placed,
Two
Lifted


—Following
the
report
of
patient
deaths,
the
FDA
formally
placed
a

clinical
hold
on
zetomipzomib
,
a
Kezar
Life
Sciences
drug
in
development
for
treating
lupus
nephritis.

Kezar
had

voluntarily
stopped

dosing
and
enrollment
in
the
study
after
emerging
safety
data
showed
four
Grade
5
(fatal)
serious
adverse
events
over
the
course
of
the
study
so
far.
The
company
said
that
three
of
those
fatalities
showed
a
common
pattern
of
symptoms
and
proximity
to
dosing;
additional
non-fatal
complications
also
showed
a
proximity
to
dosing.


—The
FDA

lifted
a
clinical
hold

on
Biomea
Fusion’s
Phase
1/2
clinical
trial
testing
BMF-219
in
type
1
and
type
2
diabetes.

Redwood
City,
California-based
Biomea
said
review
of
the
clinical
data
to
date
found
that
concerning
safety
signals
observed
in
the
Phase
2a
escalation
study
did
not
translate
to
the
larger
Phase
2b
expansion
study.
BMF-219
is
a
small
molecule
that
forms
a
covalent
bond
and
inhibits
menin,
a
protein
thought
to
suppress
the
pancreatic
beta
cells
that
produce
and
secrete
insulin.


—The
FDA

removed
the
partial
clinical
hold

placed
on
an
Avidity
Biosciences’
delpacibart
etedesiran,
or
del-disiran,
an
RNA
therapy

in
development
for
the
rare
muscular
disorder
myotonic
dystrophy
type
1.
The
partial
hold
was
placed
in
2022
following
the
report
of
a
serious
adverse
event
in
a
single
patient.
Del-disiran
is
currently
in
Phase
3
testing.


A
Rare
Disease
Drug
Withdrawal


—Pfizer
is

voluntarily
withdrawing
Oxbryta

from
the
market
and
discontinuing
all
clinical
tests
of
the
drug,
which
won
accelerated
FDA
approval
for
sickle
cell
disease
in
2019.

The
pharma
giant
said
its
decision
is
based
on
the
totality
of
data
now
indicating
higher
rates
of
complications
and
deaths
in
patients
treated
with
the
oral
drug.
The

FDA
issued
an
alert

about
the
withdrawal
and
said
it
has
been
conducting
its
own
safety
review
of
postmarketing
data.
When
the
review
concludes,
the
agency
said
it
will
communicate
additional
findings,
if
necessary.
Oxbryta
was
the
centerpiece
of

Pfizer’s
$5.4
billion
acquisition
of
Global
Blood
Therapeutics

in
2022.


Photo:
Mario
Tama,
Getty
Images

Morning Docket: 10.08.24 – Above the Law

(Photo
by
Antonio
Perez

Pool
via
Getty
Images)

*
Supreme
Court
decides
to
keep
R.
Kelly
trapped
in
a
closet.
[

Reuters]

*
Georgia
Supreme
Court
reinstates
6-week
abortion
ban
while
it
considers
appeal.
Dissent
points
out
that
the
majority
couldn’t
come
up
with
any
basis
for
this
outside
of
the
underlying
merits
arguments.
[Washington
Post
]

*
Quantum
computing
will
require
upping
your
cybersecurity
game.
[Bloomberg
Law
News
]

*
2
Live
Crew
are
trying
to
get
back
the
rights
to
their
music

which

other
artists
have
had
to
do


but
the
label
is
making
the
novel
argument
that
the
group
was
making
works
for
hire
and
aren’t
eligible
for
the
copyright
clawback.
[Law360]

*
Most
in-house
counsel
don’t
see
AI
as
“transformative.”
Which
is
a
weird
word
to
survey
because
what
does
that
even
mean?
[Corporate
Counsel
]

*
Another
Deshaun
Watson
lawsuit
intercepted
before
trial.
[The
Athletic
]

*
Judge
facing
ethics
inquiry
for
failing
to
be
“patient,
dignified
or
courteous.”
[ABA
Journal
]