Morning Docket: 10.09.24 – Above the Law

(Photo
by
Chip
Somodevilla/Getty
Images)

*
Justice
Jackson
spends
ghost
guns
argument
trying
to
figure
out
post-

Chevron
rules.
Spoiler
alert,
it’s
just
Calvinball.
[

Law360]

*
Confirming
what
we
already
knew…
the
FBI
inquiry
into
Kavanaugh’s
background
was
a
sham.
[ABA
Journal
]

*
Disbarred
lawyers
have
a
plan.
[Slate]

*
CVS
and
UnitedHealth
want
FTC
commissioners
to
disqualify
themselves
because
they
displayed
bias
in
suggesting
that
maybe
it’s
bad
to
artificially
inflate
insulin
prices.

*
The
Alex
Jones
reckoning
is
nigh.
[Bloomberg
Law
News
]

*
Judges
say
social
media
amplifies
personal
risk.
[Legaltech
News
]

*
Davis
Polk
pushes
UK
trainee
pay
to
new
high.
[LegalCheek]

Khupe engages Finance Minister to boost cancer treatment in Zim

She
said
that
the
finance
minister
has
committed
to
using
funds
from
the
sugar
tax
to
invest
in
state-of-the-art
medical
equipment
and
to
fund
cancer
research.

“I
spoke
to
the
Minister
of
Finance,
and
he
agreed
to
help.
He
informed
me
that
they
have
ring-fenced
money
from
the
sugar
tax,
which
will
be
used
to
purchase
advanced
medical
equipment
and
conduct
essential
research.
Our
scientists
need
to
focus
on
developing
treatments
for
cancer
at
all
stages,”
Dr
Khupe
said
during
an
interview
on
the
CITE’s
View.

Khupe,
who
is
also
the
Patron
of
the
Thokozani
Khupe
Cancer
Foundation
and
a
Member
of
Parliament
for
Bulawayo,
emphasised
her
vision
for
Zimbabwe
to
become
a
leader
in
cancer
treatment,
where
people
from
across
the
region
can
come
for
care.

“My
dream
is
for
Zimbabwe
to
lead
in
cancer
treatment,
so
that
people
from
other
regions
come
here
instead
of
us
going
to
South
Africa,
India,
or
the
UK.
Treatment
must
be
available,
accessible,
and
affordable
here
in
Zimbabwe,”
she
added.

Khupe
highlighted
the
current
challenges
with
cancer
diagnosis
in
Zimbabwe,
particularly
the
lack
of
functional
equipment
in
public
hospitals.

She
recounted
instances
where
Mpilo
Central
Hospital
did
not
have
working
mammogram
machines,
and
patients
were
forced
to
pay
high
fees
at
private
hospitals.

“We
have
educated
people
to
self-examine,
but
when
they
find
something
wrong
and
go
to
a
hospital,
what
then?
Mpilo’s
equipment
wasn’t
working,
and
the
same
goes
for
Parirenyatwa.
We
need
functional,
state-of-the-art
equipment
like
combined
CT
and
PET
scans,
mammograms,
and
radiation
machines
to
provide
accurate
diagnoses
and
the
right
treatment,”
Khupe
explained.

She
spoke
from
personal
experience,
sharing
how
she
received
multiple
wrong
diagnoses
in
Zimbabwe,
South
Africa,
and
India,
before
finally
receiving
the
correct
diagnosis
of
lobular
breast
cancer
in
the
UK.

The
advanced
diagnostic
tools
in
the
UK,
she
said,
made
a
critical
difference.

“The
importance
of
getting
the
right
diagnosis
cannot
be
overstated.
It
leads
to
the
right
treatment
and
can
prolong
life.
Sadly,
when
people
get
the
wrong
diagnosis,
it
often
leads
to
death,”
Khupe
noted.

Khupe
also
emphasised
the
need
for
investment
in
research
and
development
of
cancer
medications.

She
urged
the
government
to
increase
funding
for
cancer
research,
particularly
to
find
new
treatments
and
medications
that
would
help
Zimbabwe
stay
ahead
of
the
disease.

“As
much
as
we
need
state-of-the-art
equipment,
we
also
need
medication
for
all
types
of
cancer.
Research
and
development
are
crucial
to
keeping
us
ahead
of
the
disease.
We
need
new
medications
so
that
we
always
have
options
when
one
treatment
stops
working,”
she
said.

“Development
is
not
rocket
science,
it’s
discovering
what
other
people
did,
coping
from
other
people.
Let’s
copy
from
the
UK.
I
am
appealing
to
the
government
to
make
sure
they
put
more
money
into
research
and
development
particularly
on
cancer
so
that
we
can
come
up
with
cancer
medications.”

Khupe
noted
that
Mpilo
and
Parirenyatwa
were
two
major
referral
public
hospitals
which
have
cancer
units,
which
must
be
“fully
equipped”
with
the
state
of
the
arts
and
all
cancer
medication
so
anyone
in
Zimbabwe
who
walks
in
there
receives 
treatment
immediately.

“Someone
would
rather
travel
from
Binga
to
Mpilo
for
treatment
than
for
them
to
travel
from
Binga
to
South
Africa,
the
UK
or
India.
Someone
would
rather
travel
from
Chipinge
to
Parirenyatwa
than
go
to
the
UK,”
said
the
MP.

Apart
from
raising
awareness,
having
state-of-the-art
equipment,
conducting
research
and
development,
Khupe
emphasised
that
one
prevention
and
possible
method
was
living
a
“clean
lifestyle
and
eating
traditional
foods.”

As
a
result,
Khupe
praised
the
First
Lady’s
efforts
to
promote
traditional
foods
as
part
of
a
healthy
lifestyle,
linking
good
nutrition
to
better
health
outcomes.

“I
have
already
changed
and
I
am
now
eating
more
traditional
foods
than
processed
foods 
because
processed
foods
contribute
more
to
this
cancer.
When
I
was
in
India
one
of
the
doctors
said
the
best
medication
is
one’s
food.
Once
your
body
is
nourished,
it
can
fight
any
disease
but
when
malnourished
you
can
easily
succumb
to
that
disease,”
she
explained.

“When
it
comes
to
the
lives
of
people,
stop
politicising
issues,
look
at
what
the
First
Lady
is
doing. 
She
is
popularising
traditional
foods
and
I
was
saying
let’s
embrace
this
programme 
so
people
start
eating
them.
Right
now
we
are
talking
of
life
and
death
,
it’s
a
very
good
programme
we
must
all
run
with
it.”

As
part
of
her
advocacy,
Dr.
Khupe
has
also
brought
the
issue
of
cancer
awareness
to
Parliament.
She
has
called
on
MPs
to
conduct
cancer
awareness
programmes
in
their
constituencies
during
October,
which
is
Breast
Cancer
Awareness
Month.

The
MP
also
announced
plans
for
the
formation
of
a
cancer
caucus
in
Parliament,
aimed
at
pushing
for
better
government
action
on
cancer
treatment
and
research.

“I
raised
a
matter
of
national
interest
last
week

calling
on
the
Speaker
to
set
aside
a
day
every
October
to
talk
about
cancer,”
she
said.

“We
are
going
to
push
hard
to
make
sure
the
Ministers
of
Finance
and
Health
address
these
issues.

Khupe
also
called
for
more
partnerships
with
her
foundation,
urging
individuals
and
organisations
to
join
the
cause
of
cancer
awareness,
research,
and
treatment
in
Zimbabwe.

““The
foundation
has
limitations
not
funded
by
anybody
but
through
my
own
initiatives
working
with
councillor
Ntando
Ndlovu, 
Addelis
Sibutha
and
others.
We
try
to
do
what
we
can
to
make
sure
to
reach
the
few
we
can
.
better
than
not
doing
anything,”
she
said.

“If
you
want
to
partner
the
foundation
can
email
me
on  thoko63@yahoo.co.uk and
my
number
is
+263785891171.”

Tshabangu disputes Welshman Ncube’s acting presidency in CCC leadership battle

Tshabangu
is
embroiled
in
a
legal
dispute
with
a
faction
loyal
to
Nelson
Chamisa
over
who
rightfully
leads
and
manages
the
party.

The
conflict
intensified
when
the
Chamisa-aligned
faction,
which
insists
that
Chamisa
resigned
in
January,
filed
an
urgent
court
application
to
prevent
the
disbursement
of
ZWL$22,116,500
under
the
Political
Parties
(Finance)
Act.
Tshabangu
claims
the
funds
should
be
managed
under
his
leadership.

This
faction,
backed
by
Youngerson
Matete,
filed
the
application
against
the
Ministry
of
Finance
and
the
Ministry
of
Justice
to
block
any
potential
payments
to
Tshabangu
or
other
parties
they
argue
are
unauthorised
to
represent
the
CCC.

The
faction
asserts
that
Tshabangu’s
actions,
including
recalling
elected
members
of
Parliament,
are
illegitimate
and
unauthorised.

Amid
the
legal
battle,
Prof
Ncube
filed
an
application
to
join
the
proceedings,
arguing
that
as
the
acting
president
of
the
CCC,
he
has
a
substantial
interest
in
the
case.
Tshabangu
strongly
opposes
this
claim.

In
his
founding
affidavit,
Prof
Ncube
stated
that
he
is
the
acting
president
of
the
“real
and
lawful
CCC.”

“This
is
an
application
to
join
the
proceedings
under
case
number
HCH4235/24,
filed
by
the
CCC
and
Youngerson
Matate
on
27
September
2024,”
Prof
Ncube
said,
adding
that
he
learned
about
the
case
through
social
media
and
news
articles.

Ncube
argued
that
his
involvement
in
the
case
would
help
prevent
unnecessary
litigation
and
expedite
the
resolution
of
disputes
by
ensuring
that
all
parties
with
legal
interests
are
represented.

However,
in
his
notice
of
opposition,
Tshabangu
challenged
Ncube’s
claims,
stating
that
he
lacks
the
authority
to
act
on
behalf
of
the
party.
Tshabangu
argued
that
according
to
the
party’s
constitution,
an
acting
president
can
only
be
appointed
through
an
extraordinary
congress,
which
Ncube
has
not
convened.

“He
claims
to
have
become
acting
president
following
the
resignation
of
Nelson
Chamisa,
but
he
does
not
allege
that
there
was
an
extraordinary
congress
as
required
by
the
party’s
constitution,”
Tshabangu
stated.

Tshabangu
further
asserted
that
Prof
Ncube’s
term
of
office
expired
in
May
2024,
making
his
claim
to
the
presidency
invalid.

“The
officials
elected
at
the
Gweru
2019
congress
held
office
for
five
years,
which
expired
on
27
May
2024,”
Tshabangu
said.
“Therefore,
Prof
Ncube’s
term
of
office
ended,
and
he
is
not
the
acting
president
of
the
CCC.”

Tshabangu
also
noted
that
Prof
Ncube’s
failure
to
convene
a
congress,
as
required
by
the
party’s
constitution,
renders
his
claim
to
leadership
legally
untenable.

Tshabangu
detailed
several
meetings
held
with
Ncube
and
other
party
leaders
to
discuss
restoring
the
party’s
legality
and
constitutionality.
These
meetings,
however,
failed
to
produce
actionable
results,
with
Ncube
ultimately
rejecting
a
proposed
way
forward.

A
mediator
was
later
brought
in
to
help
resolve
the
dispute,
but
despite
extensive
discussions,
Prof
Ncube
has
not
responded
to
a
draft
proposal
or
attended
a
follow-up
meeting,
leaving
the
leadership
battle
unresolved.

Tshabangu
also
accused
Prof
Ncube
of
failing
to
participate
in
key
court
cases
concerning
the
party,
alleging
that
Ncube’s
interest
in
the
current
case
is
primarily
tied
to
the
distribution
of
party
funds.

“If
he
truly
has
a
direct
and
substantial
interest
in
the
party,
why
has
he
not
participated
in
any
of
the
over
60
court
cases
involving
recalls
and
by-elections?”
Tshabangu
questioned.
“His
sudden
interest
coincides
with
the
issue
of
funds.”

Chimombe, Mpofu suspect ‘third hand’ influencing their court nightmares

HARARE

Jailed
business
partners
Mike
Chimombe
and
Moses
Mpofu
suspect
there
is
a
“third
hand”
that
has
been
active
in
their
recent
court
battles
as
they
also
took
umbrage
with
a
recent
decision
by
High
Court
judge
Pisirayi
Kwenda
to
allow
the
state-owned
ZTN
to
livestream
their
trial
on
alleged
tender
fraud.

In
their
joint
application
for
referral
of
their
case
to
the
Constitutional
Court
now
before
the
High
Court,
the
two
said
this
was
done
without
their
knowledge,
adding
that
the
state
was
also
not
included.

The
two
also
raised
several
issues
which
they
feel
should
be
determined
by
the
Constitutional
Court.

The
issues
include
the
composition
of
the
bench
and
alleged
selective
prosecution,
among
other
things.


“On
the
third
day
of
the
hearing,
the
learned
judge
(it’s
not
clear
whether
in
the
presence
of
assessors
or
not)
indicated
that
court
had
commenced
late
because
he
was
entertaining
in
chambers
an
application
to
have
the
trial
proceedings
livestreamed.

“The
learned
judge
advised
that
he
had
granted
the
application
for
the
media
to
livestream
the
proceedings
in
chambers.

“This
alleged
application
was
entertained
in
the
absence
of
the
accused
persons
and
to
the
exclusion
of
the
state,”
said
the
lawyers.

The
two
also
said
there
seemed
to
be
a
“third
hand”
involved
in
their
prosecution.

They
said
initially
there
was
bail
consent
which
was
turned
down
despite
that
they
were
cooperating
and
had
made
their
first
appearance
coming
from
home.

Bail
issues
usually
do
not
arise
when
an
accused
person
is
coming
from
home.

They
also
said
the
High
Court
refused
to
hear
their
bail
application
under
case
number
183-4/24
on
the
basis
that
their
indictment
precluded
them
to
make
a
bail
application
until
the
trial
date.

The
state
is
yet
to
respond.

US$3.6 billion energy industrial park set to transform Beitbridge



A

groundbreaking
US$3.6
billion
energy
industrial
park
is
set
to
transform
Beitbridge
following
a
collaboration
between
the
Government
of
Zimbabwe,
Chinese
mining
firm
Palm
River
Energy,
and
the
Metallurgical
Special
Economic
Zone.
The
park,
located
20
km
west
of
Beitbridge
town,
aims
to
bolster
Zimbabwe’s
mining
and
energy
sectors
through
the
production
of
stainless
steel,
along
with
significant
infrastructure
and
employment
opportunities.

In
its
first
year,
the
project
has
already
employed
400
local
workers,
with
plans
to
expand
to
2,000
employees
once
fully
operational.
Covering
5,100
hectares
within
a
designated
Special
Economic
Zone
(SEZ),
the
initiative
represents
a
strategic
move
to
develop
Beitbridge
into
an
integrated
mining
and
energy
hub.

The
launch
of
the
industrial
park
follows
discussions
between
Palm
River
Energy
chairman
Mr.
Xong
Xi
Dong
and
President
Emmerson
Mnangagwa,
who
greenlit
the
project
as
part
of
his
administration’s
“Zimbabwe
is
open
for
business”
policy.

The
park’s
first
phase,
a
joint
venture
between
the
Government,
Xintai
Resources,
and
Tuli
Coal,
includes
the
establishment
of
a
coking
plant
capable
of
producing
one
million
tonnes
of
coke
annually,
a
ferro-chrome
smelting
plant
to
generate
100,000
tonnes
of
high-carbon
ferro-chrome,
and
a
1,200
MW
coal-fired
thermal
power
plant.
Excess
power
produced
by
the
facility
will
be
fed
into
the
national
grid.

The
ferro-chrome
plant
will
contribute
to
the
production
of
special
and
stainless
steel,
positioning
Zimbabwe
as
a
major
player
in
global
steel
production.
Coal
for
the
park
will
be
sourced
from
Tuli
Coal
Mine,
with
plans
to
export
coal
products
to
international
markets,
boosting
foreign
currency
earnings.

Mines
and
Mining
Development
Minister
Winston
Chitando,
following
a
recent
tour
of
the
project,
praised
President
Mnangagwa
for
securing
the
necessary
capital
and
monitoring
progress
closely.
“This
project
exemplifies
the
success
of
the
Second
Republic’s
‘Zimbabwe
is
open
for
business’
mantra,”
said
Minister
Chitando.
He
noted
that
the
first
phase
of
thermal
power
production
is
well
underway,
with
the
initial
50
MW
expected
to
be
followed
by
an
additional
50
MW.

Minister
Chitando
also
highlighted
the
value
addition
programme,
where
coking
coal
from
Tuli
Coal
Mine
and
Hwange
will
support
coke
production.
He
commended
the
investors
for
adopting
environmentally
responsible
technologies,
such
as
closed
arc
furnaces,
which
minimize
emissions
and
use
byproduct
gases
for
electricity
generation.

“This
innovation
illustrates
a
responsible
approach
to
production
that
should
be
emulated
by
other
high-carbon
ferro-chrome
producers,”
he
said,
urging
other
producers
to
contribute
to
the
country’s
electricity
generation
efforts.

The
park’s
impact
on
Beitbridge
and
Matabeleland
South
Province
is
expected
to
be
transformative.
Minister
of
State
for
Matabeleland
South
Provincial
Affairs
and
Devolution
Dr.
Evelyn
Ndlovu
emphasized
the
project’s
long-term
benefits.
“This
project
will
transform
Beitbridge
District
and
the
entire
province.
It
involves
mining,
energy
production,
and
value
addition,
and
will
significantly
boost
the
provincial
GDP,”
said
Dr.
Ndlovu.

In
addition
to
industrial
development,
a
skills
training
programme
in
collaboration
with
the
Harare
Institute
of
Technology
will
be
introduced
to
equip
locals
with
relevant
expertise.
Dr.
Ndlovu
also
revealed
that
the
project
will
give
rise
to
a
new
township,
featuring
low,
medium,
and
high-density
suburbs
to
accommodate
workers
and
their
families.

The
establishment
of
the
Beitbridge
Special
Economic
Zone
in
2018
is
part
of
President
Mnangagwa’s
broader
vision
to
attract
foreign
direct
investment
and
foster
economic
growth
in
strategic
areas.
The
energy
industrial
park
is
a
major
milestone
in
that
journey,
contributing
to
Zimbabwe’s
industrialisation
goals
and
the
Government’s
Vision
2030
to
build
a
modern,
prosperous
nation.

Law Firms Are Ghosting Their Clients — See Also

Do Y’all Not Want Money?: Start returning those phone calls!

What’s Your Check Looking Like?: Tell us about those bonuses!

That’s A Weird Way To Define A Fetus!: Florida tries to ban abortion referendum using odd reading of nuisance laws.

Looking To Do Good Work?: These schools specialize in racial justice.

AI May Change The Law School Application Process: Some changes will need to be made, but what do you do?

The post Law Firms Are Ghosting Their Clients — See Also appeared first on Above the Law.

CNN SCOTUS Scribe Says You Hurt The Chief Justice’s Feelings – Above the Law

(Photo
by
Jabin
Botsford

Pool/Getty
Images)

Chief
Justice
Roberts
is
confounded.
He
is
shaken.
He
is
weary.

As
the
Supreme
Court
begins
its
October
term,
CNN’s
woman
inside
the
beltway,
Joan
Biskupic,

paints
a
picture

of
a
man
simultaneously
obsessed
with
public
perception
of
the
Court
and
utterly
unable
to
see
how
his
rulings
undermine
its
legitimacy.

“Roberts
was
shaken
by
the
adverse
public
reaction
to
his
decision affording
Trump
substantial
immunity

from
criminal
prosecution,”
Biskupic
writes.
“His
protestations
that
the
case
concerned
the
presidency,
not
Trump,
held
little
currency.”

How
could
Americans
not
see
that
he
was
just
calling
balls
and
strikes
when
he
ruled
that
presidents
can
do
crimes?

What
is
wrong
with
you
people?

The
article
quotes
various
former
Roberts
clerks
“defend[ing]
him
to
varying
degrees.”

Erin
Murphy,
a
renowned
federal
appellate
lawyer,
adopted
her
former
boss’s
spin
that
the
case
was
about
protecting
the
institution
of
the
presidency
and
ensuring
that
successive
administrations
wouldn’t
be
“coming
after
previous
presidents”
in
an
endless
round
of
tit
for
tat.

This
is
an
odd
way
to
describe
an
opinion
that
bars
the
prosecution
of
a
sitting
president
for
any
official
action,
up
to
and
including
directing
the
Justice
Department
to
target
his
enemies

something
Trump
has
promised
to
do!

Roman
Martinez,
also
a
federal
appellate
lawyer,
if
you
can
even
believe
it,
praised
Roberts’s
immunity
ruling
for
its
“ambiguity
as
to
the
scope
of
the
immunity.”

“There’s
sorta
question
marks
across
different
aspects
of
the
opinion
on
what
it
means,”
he
told
Biskupic.
“We
haven’t
seen
the
ending
yet.”

Oh,

you

thought
the
drafting
was
a
weaselly
way
to
get
around
the
fact
that
it
invented
a
constitutional
doctrine
out
of
whole
cloth?
Can’t
you
see
what
a
stroke
of
genius
it
was
for
the
Chief
to

yaddayaddayadda

over
whether
official
acts
outside
the
“core”
presidential
duties
(whatever

that

means)
are
entitled
to
absolute
or
presumptive
immunity?

But
the
apologetics
prize
goes
to
HLS
professor
Richard
Lazarus,
“a
longtime
friend
of
Roberts
[who]
spent
time
with
him
in
July
immediately
after
the
Trump
decision
was
issued.”

Writing
in
the

Washington
Post

in
August,
he
described
the
immunity
ruling
as
“leaving
plenty
of
room
for
Trump’s
conviction
on
multiple
felony
counts.”

The
opinion
directs
the
trial
court
to
conduct
a
fact-intensive
inquiry
to
determine
whether
Trump’s
shitposts
summoning
a
mob
to
DC
and
his
pressure
campaign
to
force
the
Georgia
secretary
of
state
to
“find
11,780
votes”
were
official
acts,
and
then
pass
it
up
to
the
Supreme
Court
to
let
Sam
Alito
take
a
Sharpie
to
it.
This
provides
“a
surprisingly
clear
road
map
for
the
successful
felony
prosecution
of
Trump,”
Lazarus
insists.

The
professor
shrugs
off
the
fact
that
his
buddy
suggested
but
refused
to
conclude
that
the
pressure
campaign
to
get
Mike
Pence
to
toss
out
the
votes
of
20
million
Americans
was
part
of
Trump’s
job
and
thus
immune
from
prosecution:

Yes,
the
court
was
more
doubtful
about
whether
Trump’s
discussions
with
Pence
were
likewise
outside
the
scope
of
presidential
immunity.
But,
while
that
presents
an
intriguing
legal
issue,
it
has
little
practical
importance
for
the
fundamental
question
of
whether
Trump
can
be
prosecuted
and
convicted
of
federal
felony
offenses.
At
some
point,
additional
evidence
or
felony
offenses
just
become
piling
on.

At
the
risk
of
piling
on
Biskupic
for
accurately
reporting
on
the
view
from
inside
One
First
Street,
this
profile
ignores
the
inherent
contradiction
between
Roberts’s
fixation
on
his
own
legacy
and
his
insistence
that
the
Court
is
a
nonpartisan
edifice
of
American
society,
far
above
the
fray.

Because
you
can’t
claim
to
be
committed
to
the
principles
of

stare
decisis

when
you
utterly
disregard
precedent
the
second
you
have
the
votes.
You
can’t
claim
to
be
clinging
to
an
“original”
approach
to
the
Constitution
while
inventing
a
right
to
wander
around
the
streets
with
a
machine
gun.
You
can’t
demand
that
the
citizens
revere
you
when
you
use
your
power
to
thwart
their
express
wishes
at
every
turn.
And
you
can’t
claim
to
be
confounded
by
Trump
while
inventing
new
rules
expressly
designed
to
empower
him
and
ensure
he
never
faces
a
reckoning
for
attempting
to
overthrow
the
government.


Biskupic
quotes
the
Chief
Justice
in
2010
addressing
a
group
of
law
students:
“You
wonder
if
you’re
going
to
be
John
Marshall
or
you’re
going
to
be
Roger
Taney.


The
answer
is,
of
course,
you
are
certainly
not
going
to
be
John
Marshall.
But
you
want
to
avoid
the
danger
of
being
Roger
Taney.”

Perhaps
in
2010
the
answer
to
that
question
was
unclear.
Today
it
is
not.

Cue
1,000
former
law
clerks
turned
appellate
lawyers
to
explain
how actually
he’s
just
a
misunderstood
genius


Analysis:
John
Roberts
remains
confounded
by
Donald
Trump
as
election
approaches

[CNN]





Liz
Dye
 lives
in
Baltimore
where
she
produces
the
Law
and
Chaos substack and podcast.

Yale Law’s Diversity Decreases After Affirmative Action’s Death Knell – Above the Law



Ed.
note
:
Welcome
to
our
daily
feature,

Quote
of
the
Day
.


You
have
to
certainly
expect
there’s
going
to
be
a
significant
reduction
of
Black
students
in
our
selective
higher
education
institutions,
and
especially
our
elite
ones,
like
Yale
Law
School.
And
that
is
a
tragedy.




Professor
Kevin
Brown
of
Indiana
University
Bloomington’s
Maurer
School
of
Law,
a
Yale
Law
alumnus,
in
comments
given
to
the

Yale
Daily
News
,
on
the
decrease
in
racial
diversity
for
the
school’s
Class
of
2027,
the
first
class
admitted
without
affirmative
action,
down
to
50%
compared
with
57%
for
the
Class
of
2026.



Staci ZaretskyStaci
Zaretsky
 is
a
senior
editor
at
Above
the
Law,
where
she’s
worked
since
2011.
She’d
love
to
hear
from
you,
so
please
feel
free
to

email

her
with
any
tips,
questions,
comments,
or
critiques.
You
can
follow
her
on

X/Twitter

and

Threads

or
connect
with
her
on

LinkedIn
.

Lawyer Conflicts Create More Delay In Murdered Law Professor Case – Above the Law

Charlie
Adelson

was
convicted

in
2023
of
hiring
hitmen
to
kill
his
ex-brother-in-law,
Florida
State
Law
professor
Dan
Markel.
But
prosecutors
allege
the
plot
to
kill
Markel
goes
even
deeper.
In
November
of
2023,
Charlie
Adelson’s
mother,
Donna
Adelson,
was

arrested

for
her
alleged
role
in
the
murder-for-hire
plot.

The
trial
of
Donna
Adelson
has
hit

numerous
snags
.
But
after
Charlie
Adelson
withdrew
consent
for
his
lawyer
to
represent
his
mother,
her
representation
shifted
to
Alex
Morris.
After
familiarizing
himself
with
the
case,
Morris
expected
things
to
resume
between

November
and
February
.
That
estimation
may
have
proved
too
optimistic
given
this
new
setback

he’s
no
longer
on
the
case.

The

Tallahassee
Democrat

has
coverage:

Leon
Circuit
Judge
Stephen
Everett
on
Monday
issued
an
order
disqualifying
Robert
“Alex”
Morris
and
Adam Komisar over
actual
and
potential
conflicts
of
interest.

“Without
the
establishment
of
a
sufficient
ethical
wall
and
the
fact
that
even
third-party
counsel
cannot
avoid
the
potential
for
conflict,
the
court
cannot
permit
Robert
A.
Morris
or
Adam
Komisar
to
remain
as
counsel
of
record,”
Everett
wrote.
“Nor
will
the
court
permit
this
untenable
situation
to
continue.”

Can
somebody
please
represent
this
woman
without
conflicting
out?
There’s
no
clear
start
date
on
when
the
trial
will
resume,
but
one
criminal
defense
attorney
following
the
case
estimated
that
the
wait
may
be
as
long
as
January
2026.


Judge
In
Donna
Adelson
Murder
Trial
Disqualifies
Her
New
Attorneys
Over
Conflicts

[Tallahassee]


Earlier:


Revoked
Conflict
Waiver
Means
Delays
In
Slain
Law
Professor
Case



Chris
Williams
became
a
social
media
manager
and
assistant
editor
for
Above
the
Law
in
June
2021.
Prior
to
joining
the
staff,
he
moonlighted
as
a
minor
Memelord™
in
the
Facebook
group Law
School
Memes
for
Edgy
T14s
.
 He
endured
Missouri
long
enough
to
graduate
from
Washington
University
in
St.
Louis
School
of
Law.
He
is
a
former
boatbuilder
who
cannot
swim, a
published
author
on
critical
race
theory,
philosophy,
and
humor
,
and
has
a
love
for
cycling
that
occasionally
annoys
his
peers.
You
can
reach
him
by
email
at [email protected] and
by
tweet
at @WritesForRent.