Law Firm Business Development Is More Than Relationship Building – Above the Law

Image
courtesy
of
LexisNexis.


Lawyers
must
plug
in
to
the
details
of
their
legal
work
to
be
successful
advocates
for
their
clients,
sometimes
at
the
exclusion
of
minding
the
fundamentals
of
running
a
profitable
business.
One
of
the
keys
to
this
financial
success
is
maintaining
a
healthy
pipeline
of
new
business
opportunities
that
will
drive
future
revenue
growth.


The
2023
Hinge
Research
Institute
High
Growth
Study,
which
studies
the
activities
of
high
growth
law
firms,
found
that
high
growth
firms
stay
ahead
by
being
informed
about
industry
trends,
emerging
legal
issues,
and
market
dynamics,
anticipate
client
needs
with
data-driven
insights,
and
target
business
development
efforts
with
personalized
outreach. 


It’s
crucial
for
law
firm
leaders
to
recognize
that
modern
business
development
and
marketing
go
beyond
traditional
referral-based
strategies.
It
requires
the
use
of
next-generation
technology
tools
that
go
to
work
on
your
firm’s
behalf
to
mine
all
available
data
and
identify
new
business
prospects.


Leveraging
Tech

Most
firms
know
the
power
of
Client
Relationship
Management
(CRM)
software
as
an
engine
to
drive
firm
revenues
and
business
performance.
By
centralizing
client
information
and
offering
valuable
insights,
CRM
systems
can
significantly
improve
a
law
firm’s
efficiency
and
drive
its
growth.
For
example:


  • Client
    profiles
    can
    store
    detailed
    information
    about
    clients,
    including
    contact
    details,
    past
    matters
    handled
    and
    communication
    history;

  • Event
    management
    tools
    can
    track
    key
    metrics
    such
    as
    attendance
    and
    cross-sell
    opportunities;
    and

  • List
    management
    can
    segment
    firm
    prospects
    and
    contacts
    into
    specific
    growth
    categories.

But
growth-minded
law
firm
leaders
know
something
extra

it
is
actually
relationship
intelligence
that
fuels
and
protects
the
business
development
pipeline.

What
is
needed
is
a
next-generation
CRM
application
that
can
surface
crucial
intelligence
derived
from
relationship
data,
which
can
in
turn
help
law
firms
build
stronger
relationships
with
clients.


Next-Gen
CRM
for
Law
Firms

InterAction,
a
LexisNexis
product,
pioneered
CRM
in
the
legal
industry
in
1993.
Last
year,
LexisNexis

released


InterAction+,
a
new
cloud-based
CRM
solution
that
accelerates
business
growth
in
law
firms
of
all
sizes.
It
is
the
only
legal
CRM
platform
with
exclusive
LexisNexis
content
that
uses
relationship
intelligence
and
reveals
new
business
opportunities
for
a
competitive
advantage.
By
leveraging
LexisNexis
legal
content
and
data,
law
firm
leaders
can
prospect
for
new
business
from
both
existing
and
prospective
clients
who
may
benefit
from
the
firm’s
capabilities.


TechnoLawyer
,
which
recognized
InterAction+
as
a
“Hot
Product”
for
2023,
published
an

insightful
review

of
the
product
in
which
it
called
out
some
of
the
key
integrations
between
its
CRM
tool
and
powerful
LexisNexis
content,
including
the
following:

  • InterAction+
    lists
    litigation
    activity
    for
    clients
    and
    prospects
    using
    data
    from
    Company
    Analytics,
    one
    of
    the

    Context

    tools
    from
    LexisNexis.
    Law
    firm
    users
    can
    sort
    this
    information
    with
    filters
    such
    as
    the
    name
    of
    the
    outside
    counsel,
    practice
    area
    and
    jurisdiction

    then
    drill
    down
    further
    for
    more
    details
    on
    any
    specific
    result.
  • InterAction+
    tracks
    all
    clients
    and
    prospective
    clients
    that
    a
    firm
    would
    like
    to
    monitor
    and
    is
    now
    integrated
    with

    Nexis
    Newsdesk

    to
    surface
    convenient
    links
    to
    news
    articles
    on
    the
    web
    that
    contain
    real-time
    reports
    related
    to
    those
    target
    companies.

Aja
Hendrix,
marketing
technology
manager
at
Pillsbury
Winthrop
Shaw
Pittman
LLP,
told
TechnoLawyer
that
her
firm
has
“experienced
a
significant
increase
in
repeat
or
add-on
business”
with
the
assistance
of
InterAction+
for
driving
business
development.


Uncover
Data
for
Prospecting
Clients

InterAction+
was
built
from
the
ground
up
for
the
cloud
with
a
modern
user
interface
and
is
designed
to
tackle
the
fundamental
shortcoming
of
traditional
CRM
software:
the
lack
of
data
for
prospecting.

InterAction+
is
available
to
law
firms
of
any
size
and
existing
InterAction
customers
can
add
the
cloud-hosted
solution
of
InterAction+
with
minimal
effort.

Click


here


to
view
a
60-second
video
introducing
the
InterAction+
cloud-based
CRM
solution.

Click here to
request
a
free
demo
of
the
platform.

Georgetown Law Finally Acts Like Decent People After Massive Outrage – Above the Law

Brittany
Lovely
is
a
2L
at
Georgetown
University
Law
Center
just
trying
to
get
through
the
semester,
like
pretty
much
everyone.
She’s
also
pregnant

due
in
a
matter
of
days
(the
first
week
of
December),
so
in
my
mind,
she
deserves
all
the
accolades
for
balancing
those
two
enormous
tasks.
But
instead
of
focusing
on
studying
and
growing
her
baby,
she’s
had
to
use
her
third
trimester
to
fight
the
powers
that
be
at
GULC
over
pretty
basic
accommodations
during
finals.

Lovely
is
due
December
2nd.
GULC
exams
are
scheduled
on
December
6-13,
with
possible
deferral
exam
dates
on
December
16-18.
Anyone
who
has
ever
been
pregnant,
had
a
child,
been
around
a
newborn,
or
has
even
a
shred
of
empathy
would
quickly
realize
some
sort
of
accommodation
is
required.
As

reported
by

CNN,
Lovely
met
with
Title
IX
officials
at
Georgetown.

The
Title
IX
official
and
Lovely
came
up
with
two
options:
to
take
the
exam
early
when
the
finals
period
opened
or
take
it
at
the
same
time
as
everyone
else
in
the
class
but
from
home,
which
would
likely
be
a
few
days
after
giving
birth.

Both
options,
which
the
Title
IX
official
gave
to
the
registrar
and
the
Office
of
Academic
Affairs,
were
denied,
Lovely
said.

Lovely
asked
to
meet
with
the
official
who
denied
her
request.
At
the
meeting,
the
official
cited
the
university’s
honor
code
and
a
school-wide
policy
prohibiting
early
exams.
And
according
to

a
petition


signed
by
7,000
student,
alumni,
and
faculty

the
response
from
the
administration
official
was
truly
out
of
pocket.

Georgetown
Law
suggested
Brittany
bring
her
days-old
child
to
campus
a
few
days
after
birth,
with
minimal
recovery,
to
take
the
exam
with
more
time
so
she
can
breastfeed
her
newborn
baby
during
the
exam.
They
told
her,
“Motherhood
is
not
for
the
Faint
of
Heart.”

As
if
taking
exams
at
eight
months
pregnant
was
some
luxury.
Remember,
all
Lovely
was
seeking
was
the
ability
to
take
the
exams
early
or
from
home.
This
infuriating
response
galvanized
classmates
who
got
to
work
with
the
petition
referenced
above
and
circulating
this
flyer.

3b9fc81a-5298-44e1-bd70-0c5f3234f7b8-file_upload-Support-the-Accommodations-and-Rights-Protection-for-Brittany-Lovely-and-All-Pregnant-Students-(1)

The
(understandable)
ire
over
the
situation
from
extended
members
of
the
GULC
community
seems
to
be
the
only
thing
that
moved
the
needle.
Lovely
reports
that
“only
after
all
of
the
public
outcry,”
a
resolution
was
reached
with
the
law
school.

While
not
commenting
on
the
specifics
of
Lovely’s
account,
a
spokesperson
for
the
school
had
the
following
comment,
“Georgetown
is
committed
to
providing
a
caring,
supportive
environment
for
pregnant
and
parenting
students. We have
reached
a
mutually
agreeable
solution
with
the
student
who
raised
concerns.”

“Georgetown
offers
academic
and
practical
resources
to
assist
in
the
completion
of
a
student’s
degree
while
they
are
pregnant
or
parenting
including
pregnancy
related
adjustments
from
the
Office
of
Title
IX
Compliance,
and
disability
accommodations
from
our
Academic
Resource
Center. Georgetown
does
not
publicly
comment
on
the
specifics
of
individual
student
matters,”
the
spokesperson
continued.

Lovely
hopes
her
experience
means
permanent
changes
so
that
future
pregnant
students
don’t
have
to
deal
with
this
bullshit.
“What
I
really
would
like
to
see
is
the
school,
and
I
guess
law
schools
generally,
to
like
to
see
their
role
in
supporting
their
students
and
really
show
up,”
she
said.
“I
would
expect
a
policy
change
at
this
point
from
the
school,
just
to
make
sure
that
nobody
else
ever
has
to
go
through
something
like
this
again.”




Kathryn Rubino HeadshotKathryn
Rubino
is
a
Senior
Editor
at
Above
the
Law,
host
of

The
Jabot
podcast
,
and
co-host
of

Thinking
Like
A
Lawyer
.
AtL
tipsters
are
the
best,
so
please
connect
with
her.
Feel
free
to
email

her

with
any
tips,
questions,
or
comments
and
follow
her
on
Twitter

@Kathryn1
 or
Mastodon

@[email protected].

Top 50 Biglaw Firm Hops Aboard The Milbank Money Train – Above the Law

Chugga
chugga,
choo
choo!
All
aboard!
More
and
more
Biglaw
firms
are
hopping
onto
the
Milbank
money
train,
matching
the
compensation
leader’s

year-end
bonuses

and

special
bonuses
.

On
Friday,
Proskauer
Rose
announced
bonuses.
The
firm
brought
in
$1,230,482,000
gross
revenue
in
2023,
putting
it
at
No.
42
on
the
Am
Law
100.
The
firm
is
obviously
matching
the
generous
Milbank
bonus
scale.
Here’s
what
bonuses
look
like
at
Proskauer:

IMG_8426

Congratulations
to
everyone
at
Proskauer!


(Flip
to
the
next
page
to
read
the
full
memo
from
the
firm.)

Remember
everyone,
we
depend
on
your
tips
to
stay
on
top
of
compensation
updates,
so
when
your
firm
announces
or
matches,
please
text
us
(646-820-8477)
or email
us
 (subject
line:
“[Firm
Name]
Bonus/Matches”).
Please
include
the
memo
if
available.
You
can
take
a
photo
of
the
memo
and
send
it
via
text
or
email
if
you
don’t
want
to
forward
the
original
PDF
or
Word
file.

And
if
you’d
like
to
sign
up
for
ATL’s
Bonus
Alerts
(which
is
the
alert
list
we
also
use
for
salary
announcements),
please
scroll
down
and
enter
your
email
address
in
the
box
below
this
post.
If
you
previously
signed
up
for
the
bonus
alerts,
you
don’t
need
to
do
anything.
You’ll
receive
an
email
notification
within
minutes
of
each
bonus
announcement
that
we
publish.
Thanks
for
your
help!



Staci ZaretskyStaci
Zaretsky
 is
a
senior
editor
at
Above
the
Law,
where
she’s
worked
since
2011.
She’d
love
to
hear
from
you,
so
please
feel
free
to

email

her
with
any
tips,
questions,
comments,
or
critiques.
You
can
follow
her
on

X/Twitter

and

Threads

or
connect
with
her
on

LinkedIn
.


Bonus Time

Enter
your
email
address
to
sign
up
for
ATL’s

Bonus
&
Salary
Increase
Alerts
.


Top 100 Biglaw Firm Matches Market Bonuses — With Even More Money For High Billers – Above the Law

More
and
more
Biglaw
firms
are
matching
Milbank’s
incredibly
generous
bonus
scale,
with

year-end
bonuses

and

special
bonuses

ranging
up
to
$140,000
for
associates.

On
Friday
afternoon,
Cadwalader
entered
the
bonus
market
with
a
Milbank
match.
We
believe
the
firm

which
brought
in
$551,630,000
gross
revenue
in
2023,
putting
it
at
No.
94
on
the
Am
Law
100

is
the
first
outside
of
the
Am
Law
Top
50,
excluding
boutiques,
to
make
this
match.
Here’s
what
bonuses
looks
like
at
Cadwalader:

IMG_8431

IMG_8432

And
that’s
not
all!
Associates
who
have
recorded
2,200
client
billable
hours
or
more
will
receive
bonuses
equal
to
120%
of
the
firm’s
year-end
bonus
amounts.
Very
exciting
news
for
those
who
are
billing
overtime.

Congratulations
to
everyone
at
Cadwalader!
You
can
look
forward
to
seeing
the
money
in
your
accounts
by
or
before
the
end
of
February
2025.


(Flip
to
the
next
page
to
read
the
full
memo
from
the
firm.)

Remember
everyone,
we
depend
on
your
tips
to
stay
on
top
of
compensation
updates,
so
when
your
firm
announces
or
matches,
please
text
us
(646-820-8477)
or email
us
 (subject
line:
“[Firm
Name]
Bonus/Matches”).
Please
include
the
memo
if
available.
You
can
take
a
photo
of
the
memo
and
send
it
via
text
or
email
if
you
don’t
want
to
forward
the
original
PDF
or
Word
file.

And
if
you’d
like
to
sign
up
for
ATL’s
Bonus
Alerts
(which
is
the
alert
list
we
also
use
for
salary
announcements),
please
scroll
down
and
enter
your
email
address
in
the
box
below
this
post.
If
you
previously
signed
up
for
the
bonus
alerts,
you
don’t
need
to
do
anything.
You’ll
receive
an
email
notification
within
minutes
of
each
bonus
announcement
that
we
publish.
Thanks
for
your
help!



Staci ZaretskyStaci
Zaretsky
 is
a
senior
editor
at
Above
the
Law,
where
she’s
worked
since
2011.
She’d
love
to
hear
from
you,
so
please
feel
free
to

email

her
with
any
tips,
questions,
comments,
or
critiques.
You
can
follow
her
on

X/Twitter

and

Threads

or
connect
with
her
on

LinkedIn
.


Bonus Time

Enter
your
email
address
to
sign
up
for
ATL’s

Bonus
&
Salary
Increase
Alerts
.


Morning Docket: 11.25.24 – Above the Law

*
Google’s
antitrust
trial
wrapping
up
to
see
if
they
must
“go
directly
to
divestment,
do
not
pass
go,
do
not
collect
$200.
“[Reuters]

*
Trump’s
sentencing
for
state
crimes
committed
entirely
outside
the
presidency
delayed
indefinitely
after
winning
election.
Next
stop:
Ocean’s
11
style
heist!
[New
York
Law
Journal
]

*
Supreme
Court
changes
Facebook
status
to
“Dismissed
as
improvidently
granted.”
[Law360]

*
Law
students
are
more
diverse
and
more
in
debt
than
they
were
20
years
ago.
And
in
another
20
years,
due
to
the
Supreme
Court,
they’ll
be
less
diverse
but
still
very
much
more
in
debt.
[ABA
Journal
]

*
“RFK
Jr.
as
Health
Chief
Excites
Mass
Tort
Lawyers
Eager
to
Sue.”
[Bloomberg
Law
News
]

*
King
&
Spalding
practice
chief
just
horsing
around.
[Daily
Report
]

*
Akerman
expanding
to
Charlotte.
[Charlotte
Business
Journal
]

Magistrate Rejects Marry Mubaiwa’s Request To Stay Prosecution Due To Health Issues

Mubaiwa,
who
suffers
from
lymphodema,
argued
that
her
trial
had
been
delayed
and
that
her
health
now
prevented
her
from
giving
instructions
to
her
lawyer.

However,
the
magistrate
ruled
that
Mubaiwa
was
to
blame
for
the
delays.

According
to NewZimbabwe.com,
Mubaiwa’s
lawyer,
Beatrice
Mtetwa,
protested
the
decision,
calling
it
unfair
and
claiming
the
magistrate
misunderstood
the
basis
of
the
application.
Said
Mtetwa:

She
(the
magistrate)
said
Marry
is
responsible
for
the
delay
because
she
is
the
one
who
was
sick
and
was
being
remanded
in
hospital.

It
is
logic
that
I
simply
cannot
understand…it’s
admitted
that
she
was
sick,
it’s
admitted
in
her
ruling
that
she
was
in
hospital
so
how
it
can
be
said…
to
blame
her
for
the
delay
beats
me.

Mubaiwa,
who
has
been
battling
a
cancerous
ailment
for
over
four
years
and
lost
two
limbs,
is
on
trial
for
attempting
to
kill
Chiwenga,
while
he
was
hospitalised
in
South
Africa
in
2019.
She
also
faces
money
laundering
charges.

Due
to
her
poor
health,
her
lawyer
requested
that
her
prosecution
be
stayed,
as
she
is
unable
to
give
instructions.
A
similar
request
was
made
at
the
High
Court.
Said
Mtetwa:

Applicant
cannot
fully
enjoy
the
right
to
a
fair
hearing
which
I
am
advised
includes
the
right
to
be
physically
and
mentally
capable
of
following
the
full
proceedings,
the
capacity
to
give
instructions
to
one’s
legal
representative
throughout
the
proceedings
and
if
put
on
her
defence,
the
right
to
cogently
testify
on
the
issues
raised
in
evidence
and
to
generally
give
her
version
of
events.

I
am
able
to
say
that
the
applicant
is
currently
unable
to
fully
exercise
all
of
those
rights
due
to
all
the
issues
I
have
raised
above.

In
particular,
I
point
out
that
with
regards
the
money
laundering
case,
the
State
papers
were
provided
to
the
defence
when
the
applicant
was
already
on
heavy
medication,
had
already
lost
a
limb
and
was
trying
to
avert
the
loss
of
her
leg.

Consequently,
she
has
been
unable
to
give
instructions
on
the
documents
supplied
by
the
State
in
November,
2023
with
the
result
that
her
legal
team
only
has
general
instructions
from
the
period
of
her
arrest
when
no
document
had
been
provided
save
for
the
general
allegations
given
on
remand

Mtetwa
argued
that
it
would
be
in
the
interest
of
justice
to
give
her
client
a
break,
as
the
court
has
the
power
to
stop
unfinished
proceedings
in
exceptional
cases
where
continuing
the
trial
would
lead
to
an
unfair
outcome
that
cannot
be
corrected
in
any
other
way.

ZRP Arrests Eight Suspects Behind Multiple Armed Robberies in Bulawayo

ARREST
OF
EIGHT
SUSPECTS
FOR
ARMED
ROBBERIES
IN
BULAWAYO

The
Zimbabwe
Republic
Police
confirms
the
arrest
of
eight
suspects
in
connection
with
a
series
of
armed
robbery
cases
which
occurred
in
Bulawayo
between
19th
February
2024
and
17th
November
2024.

The
suspects
are,
Elvis
Charakupa
(40),
Khulumani
Moyo
(51),
Mavrick
Dube
(32),
Mongameli
Moyo
(27),
Nkosilomusi
Dube
(27),
Mabhena
Qhawe
(43),
Vumani
Msipa
(31)
and
Conilias
Chigara
(24).

They
targeted
service
stations,
business
premises
and
residential
areas,
stealing
cash,
cellphones
and
other
valuables.

On
20th
November
2024
detectives
in
Bulawayo
arrested
Elvis
Charakupa
at
a
house
in
Mpopoma,
Bulawayo
following
a
tip-off
which
linked
him
to
the
armed
robbery
cases.

The
suspect
implicated
Mavrick
Dube
and
Mongameli
Moyo,
leading
to
their
arrest
in
Bulawayo
and
Tsholotsho.

The
other
suspects,
Nkosilomusi
Dube,
Mabhena
Qhawe,
Vumani
Msipa
and
Conilias
Chigara
were
later
arrested
at
Beitbridge
Toll
Gate
along
Gwanda-Beitbridge
Road.

The
arrest
led
to
the
recovery
of
a
0.32
pistol
with
eight
rounds
of
ammunition
as
well
as
two
get-away
vehicles,
a
Nissan
Note,
registration
number
AFZ
4527
and
Toyota
Corolla,
registration
number
ACN
3328.

The
suspects
are
linked
to
10
cases
of
armed
robbery,
including
a
case
of
armed
robbery
which
occurred
at
a
service
station
in
Kelvin
North,
Bulawayo
on
22nd
April
2024
where
USD
550.00
cash
and
a
cell
phone
were
stolen
and
another
case
of
robbery
which
occurred
at
a
service
station
along
Market
Road,
Kelvin
North,
Bulawayo
on
10th
November
2024
where
USD
600.00
cash
was
stolen.

The
suspects
are
also
clearing
a
case
of
armed
robbery
which
occurred
on
17th
November
2024
at
a
house
in
Nkulumane
5,
Bulawayo
where
ZAR
120
000.
00
cash
and
two
cellphones
were
stolen.

Investigations
are
in
progress
to
link
the
suspects
to
other
armed
robbery
cases
which
occurred
in
Filabusi,
Gwanda,
Plumtree
and
Beitbridge.

The
Zimbabwe
Republic
Police
commends
the
public
for
providing
valuable
information
which
led
to
the
arrest
of
the
suspects.

Members
of
the
public
are
implored
to
report
suspected
criminal
activities
on
National
Complaints
Desk
number
(0242)
703631
or
WhatsApp
on
0712
800
197
or
report
at
any
nearest
Police
Station.

Batch Of Family Planning Pills Recalled In Zimbabwe Due Incorrect Tablet Arrangement


24.11.2024


3:13

The
Medicines
Control
Authority
of
Zimbabwe
(MCAZ)
has
recalled
a
batch
of
YAZ
PLUS
contraceptive
tablets
due
to
a
manufacturing
mistake
that
could
affect
safety.


Richard
Rukwata,
MCAZ’s
director-general,
said
the
affected
batch
(WEW961J),
made
by
Bayer
in
South
Africa,
had
incorrect
tablet
arrangements.

Instead
of
24
pink
hormone
tablets
and
4
orange
hormone-free
tablets,
some
packs
had
24
orange
tablets
and
4
pink
tablets.
Said
Rukwata:


This
recall
is
a
precautionary
measure
to
protect
public
health.
Non-compliance
with
product
quality
specifications
can
lead
to
a
loss
of
efficacy
and
the
affected
contraceptive
may
not
provide
the
intended
protection.
We
urge
all
stakeholders
to
take
immediate
action.

Rukwata
urged
wholesalers,
pharmacies,
clinics,
and
hospitals
to
isolate
the
affected
batch
and
work
closely
with
Bayer
and
local
distributors.

He
also
advised
consumers
using
the
contraceptive
to
check
the
batch
number
on
their
packs. He
said:

If
you
find
batch
WEW961J,
stop
using
it
immediately,
return
it
to
your
pharmacist,
and
consult
a
healthcare
professional
for
alternatives.

Post
published
in:

Featured

CCC faction leader Jameson Timba, 34 others convicted

HARARE

Citizens
Coalition
for
Change
(CCC)
faction
leader
Jameson
Timba
has
been
convicted
together
with
34
party
activists
jointly
accused
of 
participating
in
an
unlawful
gathering.

The
veteran
politician
and
78
others
were
arrested
June
16
this
year
in
a
police
raid
at
his
home
in
the
quiet
neighbourhood
of
Avondale,
Harare.

The
activists
argued
they
were
in
a
private
space
commemorating
the
Day
of
the
African
Child,
a
calendar
event
of
the
African
Union,
but
prosecutors
insisted
the
gathering
was
illegal.

What
followed
were
five
months
of
remand
imprisonment
which
has
been
widely
condemned
by
many
including
a
British
lawmaker
in
the
House
of
Lords.


They
were
convicted
on
Friday
by
a
Harare
magistrate
while
28
others
who
were
part
of
the
group
were
acquitted.

The
activists
face
up
to
five
years
in
prison
or
a
fine.

Sentencing
is
set
for
next
week,
said
Webster
Jiti,
one
of
the
activists’
lawyers.

The
Zanu
PF
led
government
has
led
a
tough
hand
on
opposition
gatherings
with
activists
subjected
to
many
months
of
pre-trial
detention
for
the
alleged
offences.

The
opposition
CCC
accuse
Zimbabwean
rulers
of
stifling
freedom
of
assemble
and
manipulating
courts
to
hand
tough
decisions
against
opposition
activists
and
government
critics
against
the
cardinal
doctrine
of
separation
of
powers.

The
government
denies
the
claims.

Zimbabwe’s president launches study into slavery reparations


Zimbabwean
President
Emmerson
Mnangagwa
addresses
a
press
conference
at
State
House
in
Harare,
Sunday,
Aug.
27
2023.
Authorities
in
Zimbabwe
say
President
Emmerson
Mnangagwa
has
been
re-elected
for
a
second
and
final
term.
The
Zimbabwe
Election
Commission
announced
late
Saturday
that
Mnangagwa
won
52.6%
of
the
votes
in
the
midweek
election.
(AP
Photo/Tsvangirayi
Mukwazhi)

The
study
is
being
conducted
by
the
Zimbabwe
National
Elders
Forum
led
by
Dr
Felix
Mukonowengwe
and
other
members
include
academics
and
clergy.

Mukonowengwe
told University
World
News
 that
some
of
the
academics
involved
in
the
presidential
initiative
are
vice-chancellors
at
Zimbabwe’s
universities.

They
include
“vice-chancellors
such
as
Professor
Paul
Mapfumo
of
the
University
of
Zimbabwe
and
Professor
Eddie
Mwenje
of
the
Bindura
University
of
Science
Education.
We
also
have
Professor
Kuzvinetsa
Dzvimbo
[CEO
of
the
Zimbabwe
Council
for
Higher
Education].
Our
researchers
are
coming
from
our
universities
and
some
of
them
are
professors
like
[Mark]
Nyandoro
from
the
University
of
Zimbabwe,”
he
said.

The
commissioning
of
the
study
comes
shortly
after
meeting of
55
Commonwealth
countries
held
in
Samoa
late
in
October
ended
with
a
communiqué
that
said:
“The
time
has
come
for
a
meaningful,
truthful
and
respectful
conversation
towards
forging
a
common
future
based
on
equity”.

The
Commonwealth
is
a
grouping
composed
of
Britain
and
its
former
colonies,
but
Zimbabwe
withdrew
from
the
bloc
in
2003
after
the
then
president,
Robert
Mugabe,
launched
a
programme
to
seize
land
owned
by
white
farmers,
leading
to
Western
countries
imposing
sanctions
on
the
African
country.


What
the
study
will
focus
on

At
the
recent
launch
of
the
study,
Mnangagwa
said
it
will
be
focused
on
colonial
injustices
suffered
from
1890
to
1980,
the
year
that
Zimbabwe
got
its
independence.

“The
proposed
study,
as
I
am
reliably
informed,
will
put
forward
recommendations
that
will
explore
options
to
assist
in
the
long-term
healing
of
affected
communities
as
well
as
for
rekindling
and
recreating
goodwill
between
the
Zimbabwean
society
at
large
and
the
former
colonial
power,”
said
Mnangagwa.

“We
have
observed
and,
indeed,
quite
recently,
former
colonial
powers
the
United
Kingdom
apologising
to
the
Mau
Mau
of
Kenya,
and
Germany
also
apologising
to
the
Mbanderu,
Herero
and
Nama
people
of
Namibia.
Therefore,
we
ask,
when
are
the
rest
of
us
in
the
former
colonies
going
to
receive
similar
apologies,
we
wonder.”

The
Zimbabwean
president
said
the
time
has
come
to
engage
Britain
to
seek
what
he
termed
the
much-delayed,
yet
important,
post-colonial
gestures
of
reparations,
restorations,
apology
and
reconciliation.

“Equally,
the
subject
of
reparations
is
not
new,
but
the
calls
for
restitution
continue
to
grow
louder
and
louder,”
added
Mnangagwa.

An
academic
who
is
part
of
those
leading
the
initiative
to
conduct
the
study,
Professor
Mandivamba
Rukuni,
said
they
will
also
hire
experts
to
gather
evidence.


Is
foreign
aid
a
form
of
payback?

In
an
interview
with University
World
News
,
Professor
of
World
Politics
at
the
School
of
Oriental
and
African
Studies,
University
of
London,
Stephen
Chan,
who
was
recently
deported
from
Zimbabwe,
said
the
presidential
initiative
is
part
of
a
rhetorical
foreign
policy
and
will
lead
nowhere.

“It
also
has
fundamental
flaws
as
Britain
never
ruled
Rhodesia
directly
for
much
of
its
20th-century
history.
You
can
view
the
2,000
farm
seizures
as
reparations
for
the
policies
of
what
was
essentially
an
autonomous
white
government
not
directed
by
Britain.
Britain
might,
at
some
stage,
say
that
the
multimillions
of
foreign
aid
should
be
taken
into
account
in
any
rhetorical
war,”
he
said.

Dr
Knox
Chitiyo,
the
associate
fellow,
Africa
Programme,
at
Chatham
House,
a
global
think
tank
on
international
geopolitical
matters,
and
a
former
senior
lecturer
of
history
and
war
studies
at
the
University
of
Zimbabwe,
said
the
proposed
study
is
important
as
it
will
build
on
existing
work
on
Zimbabwe’s
history
and
historiography.

Chitiyo
said
the
study
may
also
be
a
useful
addition
to
wider
African
and
global
research
outputs
on
colonialism
and
land.

“Whether
the
study
can,
or
will,
be
used
to
demand
reparations
remains
to
be
seen.
What
is
likely,
however,
is
that,
once
concluded,
the
project
will
be
an
important
addition
to
Zimbabwe’s
history,
and
it
might
also
become
an
important
background
or
contextual
document
regarding
future
Zimbabwe-UK
relations,”
he
said.

Asked
what
could
be
the
role
of
academics
or
scholars
in
such
a
study,
he
added:
“It
is
vital
that
this
study
be
research-driven
and
evidence-
and
memory-led.
The
information
would
come
from
various
sources,
including
oral,
primary,
anecdotal,
secondary
sources,
and
so
on.
Academics
or
scholars
[alongside
communities]
would,
thus,
need
to
have
a
major
role

perhaps
a
primary
role

in
this
project.”

On
whether
or
not
Britain
should
pay
reparations
for
colonialism,
Chitiyo
said
this
is
a
complex
issue
and
is
part
of
a
wider
global
debate
on
slavery
and
colonialism.


Slavery
reparations
and
country
relations

He
noted
that
UK
Prime
Minister
Sir
Keir
Starmer
and
UK
Chancellor
of
the
Exchequer
Rachel
Reeves
have
both
stated
that
the
UK
will
not
pay
slavery
reparations,
adding
that
this
probably
also
applies
to
colonial
reparations.

“The
question
of
whether
the
UK
should
pay
financial
reparations
for
slavery
and
colonialism
is
a
very
contested
and
highly
polarising
issue
within
the
UK,
and
between
the
UK
and
former
colonies.
Nevertheless,
the
UK
government
has
acknowledged
the
need
for
further
dialogue,”
said
Chitiyo.

He
said
an
apology
from
the
UK
on
slavery
and
colonialism
would
send
an
important
signal
regarding
the
UK
government’s
willingness
to
seriously
engage
on
this
issue
as
some
other
former
colonial
governments,
including
the
Netherlands
and
Germany,
have
apologised
for
slavery
and
their
colonial
past.

He
said
reparations
and
reparatory
justice
can
range
from
the
symbolic
apology,
to
debt
relief
and
financial
reparations.
But,
the
current
and
previous
UK
governments
have
not
been
willing
to
contribute
financially
to
reparations.

The
scholar
said
that
what
is
also
clear
is
that
the
slavery
and
colonialism
debate
is
not
going
away
and
is
now
a
high-level
diplomatic
issue
and
one
which
is
significant
as
regards
relations
between
developing
nations
and
the
UK,
and
also
the
evolution
of
the
Commonwealth.

“On
taking
office,
UK
Foreign
Secretary
David
Lammy
spoke
of
his
desire
for
a
‘reset’
in
the
UK’s
relations
with
the
Global
South.

“The
Global
South
are,
in
turn,
exerting
greater
agency
and
influence
in
global
affairs
and
agenda-setting.

“It
is
clear
that
the
question
of
reparations
is
now
a
significant
factor
in
the
UK’s
relations
with
developing
countries,
particularly
the
Caribbean
and
Africa.
If
the
UK
does
want
a
genuine
reset
in
its
international
relations,
particularly
with
its
former
colonies,
it
will
have
to
engage
more
meaningfully
on
this
issue,”
he
added.


Initiatives
from
the
Caribbean

Godfrey
Mtindi,
a
Zimbabwean
international
development
consultant,
told University
World
News
 that
a
precedent
had
been
set
for
reparations
to
be
paid
to
Zimbabwe.

“From
the
historical
context
of
white
monopoly
capital,
which
exploited
slaves
and
was
compensated
when
slavery
was
‘banned’,
the
English
compensating
the
Afrikaners
in
South
Africa
for
the
inhuman
treatment
during
their
[Anglo-Boer
or
South
African]
war
(and
skipping
the
blacks),
Germany
being
made
to
pay
reparations
after
having
been
adjudged
of
having
started
the
First
World
War
by
the
Versailles
Treaty,
[and]
Germany
compensating
the
Jews
after
the
genocide
by
the
Nazis,
Zimbabwe’s
compensation
is
within
international
law,”
said
Mtindi.

He
said
the
academics
who
are
part
of
the
study
could
collect
primary
and
secondary
data
on
the
system
of
the
systematic
and
violent
removal
of
blacks
from
their
land
and
destruction
of
the
African
economy.

He
said
they
could
do
a
comparative
study
of
similar
historical
cases
of
colonialism,
slavery
and
quantify
the
loss
Zimbabwe
incurred
developmentally
from
1890
to
1980,
“and
trace
the
specific
companies
which
were
formed
in
the
UK
with
Zimbabwean
resources
and
money
that
was
laundered
there”.

In
2017,
Zimbabwe’s
then
minister
of
higher
and
tertiary
education,
science
and
technology
development
Professor
Jonathan
Moyo
commissioned research on
the
economic
impact
of
sanctions
imposed
by
Western
countries
on
the
country
after
it
launched
its
land
redistribution
exercise.

Preliminary
findings
said
Zimbabwe
lost
about
US$4.8
billion
worth
of
revenue
in
the
manufacturing
sector
in
2010
and
US$2.1
billion
in
2015
due
to
Western
sanctions,
according
to
the
preliminary
results
of
a
government-funded
academic
study
to
probe
their
impact
on
the
country.

But,
following
the
decision
by
Commonwealth
countries
to
have
a
conversation
on
reparations
last
month,
Lammy said the
concept
of
reparations
for
former
colonial
nations
affected
by
slavery
“is
not
about
the
transfer
of
cash”.
Lammy
said
the
UK
would,
instead,
look
to
develop
relations
with
African
nations
through
sharing
skills
and
science.

However,
Caribbean
nations
under
their
regional
grouping
called
Caribbean
Community
(CARICOM)
who
led
the
reparations
call
within
the
Commonwealth
came
up
with
a
10-point
plan
(for
reparatory
justice
in
which
they
called
for
a
full
formal
apology,
education
programmes,
healthcare,
debt
cancellation
and
direct
monetary
payments).

In
its
plan,
the
group
said
that,
at
the
end
of
the
European
colonial
period
in
most
parts
of
the
Caribbean,
the
British,
in
particular,
left
black
and
indigenous
communities
in
a
general
state
of
illiteracy.
Some
70%
of
blacks
in
British
colonies
were
functionally
illiterate
in
the
1960s
when
nation
states
began
to
get
their
independence,
they
added.

They
said
the
transatlantic
slave
trade
was
the
largest
forced
migration
in
human
history
and
has
no
parallel
in
terms
of
man’s
inhumanity
to
man.

“Generations
of
Caribbean
youth,
as
a
consequence,
have
been
denied
membership
and
access
to
the
science
and
technology
culture
that
is
the
world’s
youth
patrimony.
Technology
transfer
and
science
sharing
for
development
must
be
a
part
of
the
CARICOM
Reparatory
Justice
Programme,”
reads
part
of
the
10-point
plan.

Post
published
in:

Featured