Morning Docket: 01.21.25 – Above the Law

*
TikTok
is
back
in
business
with
Trump
declaring
that
he
won’t
enforce
the
law
at
this
time.
That’s
not
a
power
granted
by
the
statute
but…
YOLO.
[Reuters]

*
Trump
says
he
wants
the
death
penalty
for
anyone
killing
cops…
then
pardoned
a
bunch
of
people
who
tried
to
kill
cops.
[AP
News
]

*
“What
To
Expect
From
Trump’s
Judicial
Nominations”…
well
if
Aileen
Cannon
made
his

first

cut,
the
cupboard
might
be
bare.
[Law360]

*
Prince
Harry’s
lawsuit
against
the
Murdochs
on
hold
pending
a
reportedly
massive
settlement
offer.
[Newsweek]

*
The
role
of
the
Chief
Justice
in
the
inauguration…
how
did
that
guy
get
there?
[One
First
]

*
Trump
signs
executive
order
nullifying
Fourteenth
Amendment
and
a
lawsuit
is
already
filed.
[Bloomberg
Law
News
]

*
Tom
Goldstein’s

wild
poker
and
women
indictment

may
just
be
the
beginning
of
his
problems.
[National
Law
Journal
]

Zimbabwe Events of 2024


Opposition
leader
Jameson
Timba
of
the
Citizens
Coalition
for
Change
(CCC)
party,
arrested
for
holding
a
political
gathering
that
authorities
said
was
unauthorized,
disembarks
a
prison
truck
as
he
arrives
for
a
hearing
at
the
magistrates’
court
in
Harare,
Zimbabwe,
June
21,
2024.
©
2024
REUTERS/Philimon
Bulawayo

They
continued
to
weaponize
the
criminal
justice
system
against
perceived
critics
and
the
political
opposition.
Impunity
for
the
ruling
party
ZANU-PF
violence,
intimidation,
harassment,
and
repression
against
opposition
members
and
civil
society
activists
restricted
civic
and
political
space.

The
authorities
failed
to
uphold
the
government’s
domestic
and
international
human
rights
obligations
to
respect
peaceful
activism.

Intensified
Crackdown
on
Government
Critics

Ahead
of
the
August
17
Southern
African
Development
Community
(SADC)
heads
of
state
summit
in
Zimbabwe’s
capital,
Harare,
the
authorities
intensified
the
crackdown
on
opposition
members
and civil
society activists.
Security
forces
arrested
more
than 160
people
,
including
a
religious
leader,
elected
parliament
and
council
officials,
political
activists,
union
leaders,
students,
and
journalists.

On
June
16,
police  arrested over
70
people
at
a
private
event
to
commemorate
the
Day
of
the
African
Child
at
the
home
of
Citizens
Coalition
for
Change
(CCC)
party
leader,
Jameson
Timba.
The
police
charged
the
detainees,
including
Timba
with
“participating
in
a
gathering
with
the intent
to
promote
violence,
breaches
of
peace
or
bigotry,”
as
well
as
disorderly
conduct.
The
detainees’
lawyers
said
the
police
had
beaten
their
clients
during
arrest,
and
further
ill-treated,
tortured,
and
denied
them
medical
care
and
other
rights
in
detention.
The
detainees
included
a
woman
with
year-old
child
.  Tambudzai
Makororo
,
whose
leg
was fractured during
the
arrest,
was
not
allowed
surgery
until
23
days
later.
Makororo’s
son
died
while
she
was
in
custody,
but
the
authorities denied her
request
to
attend
the
funeral.

On
June
24,
police arrested
44
members
 of
the
Zimbabwe
National
Students
Union,
including
its
president,
Emmanuel
Sitima,
and
required
them
to
pay
fines
for
“disorderly
conduct”
before
releasing
them.

At
a
ZANU-PF
meeting
on
June
27,
President
Emerson
Mnangagwa
said
he
was
aware
of
certain
rogue
elements
 within
the
nation
who
are
bent
on
peddling
falsehoods
and
instigating
acts
of
civil
disorder,
especially
before,
during,
and
after
regional
and
world
stage
events.”
He
said
security
agencies
were
on
high
alert
to
decisively
deal
with
the
so-called
rogue
elements.

Police
on
June
29
arrested
in
a
private
home,
five
members
of
a
movement
called National
Democratic
Working
Group
, for
allegedly
holding
an
“unsanctioned
gathering”
and
“agitating
for
criminal
acts
in
the
country.”
A
spokesperson
for
the
five
said
they
were meeting
to
organize
 food
disbursements
to
needy
people
in
their
area. On
June
30,
authorities disrupted a
memorial
event
for
an
opposition
supporter
killed
in
2022
and
arrested
several
participants.

On
July
31,
suspected
state
agents pulled
four
activists
 off
a
plane
before
takeoff
at
the
Harare
International
airport,
and
forcibly
disappeared
them
for
nearly
eight
hours.
Lawyers
said
the
agents
subjected
all
four
to torture
and
other
ill-treatment
,
and
that
the
agents threatened
to
rape
 and
kill
the
wife
of
Robson
Chere,
one
of
the
detained
activists.
The
authorities
charged
the
four
activists
with
“disorderly
conduct”
for
allegedly
participating
in
a
protest
on
June
27.
Three
of
the
four
activists
were granted
bail
 after
35
days
in
detention.

On
August
2,
Jacob
Ngarivhume,
leader
of
the
opposition
party
Transform
Zimbabwe,
was
arrested
and
charged
for
allegedly
participating
in
a
July
16
event
where
police
arrested
over
70
CCC
members. Ngarivhume
was granted
bail
 on
October
23,
after
82
days
in
detention.

The
authorities
have
continued
to
deny
those
arrested
their
rights
to
bail
and
a
fair
trial.
A
leading
opposition
politician,
Job
Sikhala, was
freed
 in
January
after
being
jailed
for
595
days
on
charges
of
inciting
public
violence.

On
August
20,
the
ZANU-PF
spokesperson
said
activists
had
been
arrested
as
a
preventative
measure

and
could
be
released
following
the
“success”
of
the
SADC
Summit.
However,
authorities
at
time
of
writing
are
yet
to
unconditionally
release
detained
activists
and
opposition
members
since
the
SADC
Summit
ended
in
August.

Repression
of
Civil
Society
Organizations

The
authorities
have
continued
to
restrict
civic
space
and
the
rights
to
freedom
of
expression,
association,
and
peaceful
assembly.
The
government
has
sought
to
enact,
or
has
enacted,
legislation
that
would
substantially
compound
existing
restrictions
on
human
rights. The
Private
Voluntary
Organizations
Amendment
Bill
 2021
passed
by
parliament
in
February
2023
failed
to
get presidential
assent
 and
lapsed
in
August
2023.
A
new
bill
was
passed
by
the
senate
on
October
17
and
if
signed
into
law
by
the
president,
it
will
directly
affect
the
structure
and
management
of
civil
society
organizations.
It
will
also
allow
the
authorities
to
cancel
the
registration
of
organizations
deemed
to
have
“political
affiliation”
with
little
to
no
recourse
to
judicial
review.
Actions
considered
in
violation
of
certain
provisions
of
the
law
could
be
prosecuted,
with
penalties
ranging
from
heavy
fines
to
imprisonment.

Impunity
for
Abuses

The
authorities’
failure
to
investigate
and
prosecute
abuses
primarily
committed
by
state
security
agents
has
entrenched
the
culture
of
impunity.
On
June
29,
2024,
media
quoted
the
National
Army
commander,
Lt.
Gen. Anselem
Sanyatwe
,
who
has
been
placed
under
sanctions
by
the
United
States
government,  as
saying
 that
in
future
elections,
people
would
be
marched
to
polling
stations
to
vote
for
the
ruling
ZANU-PF
party,
“whether
you
like
it
or
not.”

For
decades,
Zimbabwe’s
military
and
other
state
security
forces
have interfered in
the
nation’s
political
and
electoral
affairs
in
violation
of
citizens’
civil
and
political
rights. The
government
and
military
hierarchies
have
repeatedly
ignored
the
provisions
of Zimbabwe’s
Constitution
, which
prohibits
members
of
security
agencies
from
acting
in
a
partisan
manner,
further
the
interests
of
any
political
party,
or
cause
or
violate
anyone’s
fundamental
rights
or
freedoms.

In
March,
the
US
government
renewed sanctions
against
11
individuals
,
including
President
Mnangagwa,
and
three
entities
for
their
involvement
in
corruption
or
serious
human
rights
abuses.
The
announcement
noted
that
Zimbabwe’s
security
forces
had
engaged
in
the
violent
repression
of
political
activists
and
civil
society
organizations.

Proposed
Abolition
of
the
Death
Penalty

In
March,
Zimbabwe’s
cabinet
approved a
bill
 that,
if
passed
by
parliament,
would
abolish
the
death
penalty.
Although
Zimbabwe
carried
out
its
last
executions
in
2005,
courts
have
continued
to
impose
the
death
sentence.
There
are
currently 63
prisoners
 on
death
row. The Constitution  protects
the
right
to
life,
but
empowers
courts
in
limited
circumstances
to
impose
the
death
penalty
for
people
convicted
of
the
charge
of
aggravated
murder.
The
proposed
law
would
prohibit
the
imposition
of
death
penalty
in
the
country
and
would
require
the
Supreme
Court
to
substitute
the
death
penalty
on
appeal,
for
some
other
appropriate
penalty.

Sexual
Orientation
and
Gender
Identity

Section
73
of
the
2006
Criminal
Code
of
Zimbabwe
criminalizes
same-sex
sexual
activities
between
men.
Sentences
include
a
maximum
penalty
of
one
year
and
a
fine.
Article
78(3)
of
the
Constitution
prohibits
same-sex
marriage.
Lesbian,
gay,
bisexual,
and
transgender
people
frequently
face
threats,
harassment
and
violence.
In
August
2024,
two
men
were arrested
and
charged
under
sodomy
laws
 while
they
were
seeking
justice
for
blackmail
and
extortion.

Children’s
Rights


Child
labor
 remained
serious
problem,
 with
children
participating
in
hazardous
work
in tobacco
farming
 and
other
sectors. School
fees
 continued
to
pose
barrier to educationPregnant
girls
and
adolescent
mothers
 continued
to
face
challenges
continuing
formal
education.

Post
published
in:

Featured

Harare City Council Officials Question Water Plant Deal

The
officials
questioned
Helcraw’s
capacity,
referencing
its
failed
bid
to
supply
water
meters
in
a
US$2
million
tender
in
2023.

According
to
an
unnamed
government
official
who
spoke
to The
Independent
,
Helcraw
Electrical
Projects
was
chosen
to
establish
a
new
water
treatment
plant
and
supply
water
meters
in
partnership
with
Chinese
firm
Hangzhou
Laison
Technology.
Said
the
official:

A
series
of
meetings
have
been
held
to
discuss
the
agreement
between
the
government
and
Helcraw
Electrical
Projects.

On
January
12,
city
officials,
including
acting
water
director
Richard
Kunyadini
attended
a
meeting
at
Makombe
Building.

The
meeting
emphasised
on
the
need
to
first
conduct
a
due
diligence
on
Helcraw
Electrical
Projects,
focusing
on
whether
they
have
capacity
to
fund
the
project.

It
was
centred
on
privatisation
of
water
and
sewer
services
and
introducing
Helcraw
who
had
signed
a
Memorandum
of
Understanding
as
the
chosen
investor
without
having
gone
through
any
tender
process.

The
meeting
focused
on
a
number
of
issues
that
include
whether
Helcraw
Electrical
Projects
had
the
financial
and
technical
capacity
to
roll
out
the
massive
project.

Officials
also
questioned
whether
Helcraw
Electrical
Projects
had
presented
the
proof
of
funding
to
finance
the
project.

More
importantly,
the
meeting
questioned
why
a
project
of
this
scope
could
be
awarded
without
first
conducting
due
diligence
on
Helcraw
Electrical
Projects.

Helcraw
is
expected
to
supply
prepaid
meters
for
350,000
properties
at
a
cost
of
US$96
million
and
replace
a
100-kilometre
pipe
network
valued
at
US$23
million.

When
contacted
for
a
comment
by
The
Independent,
Jere
requested
a
meeting
next
week,
stating
he
could
not
share
such
details
over
the
phone.

Kunyadini,
who
also
attended
the
meeting,
referred
The
Independent’s
questions
to
Mayor
Jacob
Mafume.

Mafume,
who
was
in
Russia
at
the
time,
said
no
one
questioned
the
deal
when
it
was
signed
last
week.
He
was
among
the
officials
who
attended
the
signing
ceremony.

Proskauer’s Bonus Pay Deception Is Bad For PR And Morale – See Also – Above the Law

Why
are
you
so
mad
at
moving
goalposts
that
cost
you
thousands?!
(image
via
Getty)


The
Unexpected
Hours
Threshold
Is
A
Reason
To
Jump
Ship:


This
isn’t
the
first
time
they’ve
done
it
either
.


Upholding
The
TikTok
Ban
Is
Costing
The
Country
Its
Reputation:


Not
only
is
the
grass
actually
greener
on
the
other
side,
we’ve
been
lied
to
about
it
!


Goldstein
Plays
The
Trump
Card:


Hopefully
this
will
help
him
beat
his
poker
related
charges
.


Drake
Cries
Wolf
Against
The
Popular
Kids
As
The
Tide
Shifts
Against
Him:


Spurned
“One
Dance”
pop
star
names
popular
streamers
in
defamation
lawsuit
.

The Real Leaders On The Equal Rights Amendment – Above the Law

(Photo
by
Chip
Somodevilla/Getty
Images)



Ed.
Note:

Welcome
to
our
daily
feature

Trivia
Question
of
the
Day!


Today
President
Biden

confirmed
his
belief

the
Equal
Right
Amendment
is
the
“law
of
the
land,”
because
in
2020
Virginia
became
the
38th
state
to
ratify
the
amendment
(though
it
was
after
the
Congressionally
imposed
seven
year
sunset
period).
Which
state
first
ratified
the
28th
Amendment?


Hint:
The
state
ratified
the
amendment
on
the
same
day
the
amendment
was
approved
by
Congress.



See
the
answer
on
the
next
page.

Trump Takes The Oath Of Office – Above the Law

(Photo
by
Brendan
McDermid-Pool/Getty
Images)

Judge
Arthur
Engoron
heard
the
business
fraud
case
involving
Donald
Trump
and
his
businesses.
Engoron
ultimately
imposed
a
$450
million
judgment
against
the
defendants.

During
that
trial,
Trump
had
repeatedly
disparaged
court
personnel,
including
the
judge’s
law
clerk.
After
the
judge
entered
a
gag
order
to
protect
the
courtroom
staff,
Trump
went
outside
the
courtroom
and
told
reporters
that
a
person

who’s
very
partisan
[is]
sitting
alongside”
the
judge.
This
appeared
to
again
disparage
the
judge’s
clerk
and
thus
to
violate
the
gag
order.
Judge
Engoron
had
Trump
take
the
witness
stand.

Trump
testified
that
he
had
not
in
fact
been
referring
to
the
judge’s
clerk
as
being
a
partisan,
but
rather
was
referring
to
Michael
Cohen,
Trump’s
former
lawyer,
who
had
been
on
the
witness
stand
at
the
time.

This
was
obviously
a
lie,
and
the
judge
ultimately

so
ruled
:
“The
idea
that
the
statement
would
refer
to
the
witness
doesn’t
make
any
sense
to
me.”
According
to
the
judge,
Trump’s
testimony,
under
oath,
was
“not
credible.”

Lying
under
oath.
That’s
not
good.
In
the
1990s,
Republicans
wanted
to
impeach
President
Bill
Clinton
for
lying
under
oath.

But
I
digress.

In
the
days
leading
up
to
January
6,
2021,
President
Trump
urged
his
supporters
to
come
to
Washington,
D.C.,
telling
them
that
the
day
would
be
wild.”
Trump
gave
a
speech
on
the
sixth,
and
the
assembled
crowd
attacked
the
Capitol
Building.
Whether
or
not
you
agree
that
Trump
instigated
the
riot,
he
indisputably
remained
silent
for
three
hours
while
a
mob
attacked
Congress.
Whether
Trump
thought
the
crowd
consisted
of
members
of
Antifa,
or
FBI
informants,
or
simply
peaceful
protestors,
Trump
did
not
lift
a
finger
or
say
a
word
to
defend
the
Capitol
Building.
A
simple
statement
would
have
sufficed.
Perhaps:
“If
you
by
any
chance
are
my
supporters,
please
understand
that
I
didn’t
mean
this
at
all.
You
misunderstood
me.
I
didn’t
mean
that
you
should
ransack
the
Capitol
Building.
Please
go
home.”

But
no.

Trump
is
not
one
to
protect
the
United
States
to
the
best
of
his
ability.
Nor,
as
Judge
Engoron
held,
is
Trump
one
to
tell
the
truth,
even
when
under
oath.

On
Monday
at
noon,
Donald
J.
Trump
will
put
his
hand
on
a
bible
and
repeat
under
oath
the
words
set
forth
in
Article
II,
Section
One,
Clause
8
of
the
Constitution:

I
do
solemnly
swear
(or
affirm)
that
I
will
faithfully
execute
the
Office
of
President
of
the
United
States,
and
will
to
the
best
of
my
ability,
preserve,
protect
and
defend
the
Constitution
of
the
United
States.

That
doesn’t
give
me
a
whole
lot
of
comfort.

How
about
you?




Mark 
Herrmann spent
17
years
as
a
partner
at
a
leading
international
law
firm
and
later
oversaw
litigation,
compliance
and
employment
matters
at
a
large
international
company.
He
is
the
author
of 
The
Curmudgeon’s
Guide
to
Practicing
Law
 and Drug
and
Device
Product
Liability
Litigation
Strateg
y (affiliate
links).
You
can
reach
him
by
email
at 
[email protected].

Biglaw Firm Learning The Hard Way It’s Best To Be Straightforward With Associates – Above the Law

When

last
we
checked
in
with
Proskauer

they
were
doing
associates
dirty.
Despite
not
formally
having
an
hours
requirement
to
receive
year-end
bonuses,
some
associates
found
themselves
with
nothing
but
coal
in
their
stocking
from
the
firm.
Why
didn’t
they
get
the
cash
they
were
expecting?
Well,
they
didn’t
meet
the
hours
requirement

by
as
little
as
3
hours!
You
know,
that
hours
requirement
that
doesn’t
formally
exist…
(According
to
tipsters,
this
year
isn’t
the
first
time
the
firm
pulled
this
particular
move.)

Now
some
insiders
are
reporting
back
what’s
been
going
down
since
the
story
broke.
Unsurprisingly
morale
is
not
great

even
associate
that
made
the
invisible
hours
threshold
last
year
feel
blindsided
by
the
firm’s
policy.
And
the
firm
leadership
has
been
forced
by
the
negative
publicity
to
acknowledge
the
standard
they’ve
been
holding
associates
to.

From
a
tipster:

After
your
article
was
posted,
literally
9
minutes
later,
we
received
an
email
for
a
virtual
town
hall
to
take
place
the
next
day
at
noon.
Now
we
have
a
2000
hour
requirement
for
the
current
fiscal
year…
which
started
in
November.

They
say
it
can
change
from
year
to
year
but
they
will
tell
us
ahead
of
time
(yeah
right,
we’re
not
going
to
believe
that
shit
anymore)

It’s
vile
and
I
can’t
wait
to
leave
this
firm.
Hope
they
enjoy
the
millions
they
make
from
squeezing
every
last
ounce
of
humanity
from
the
firm
that
used
to
be
a
good
place
to
work.
Morale
is
very
very
low.
Would
not
be
surprised
if
they
start
hemorrhaging
associates.
Maybe
that’s
their
intention.

Oof,
doesn’t
sound
like
Proskauer
is
a
fun
place
to
work
right
now.
Maybe
they’ll
take
the
hint
and
start
being
straightforward
with
associates.




Kathryn Rubino HeadshotKathryn
Rubino
is
a
Senior
Editor
at
Above
the
Law,
host
of

The
Jabot
podcast
,
and
co-host
of

Thinking
Like
A
Lawyer
.
AtL
tipsters
are
the
best,
so
please
connect
with
her.
Feel
free
to
email

her

with
any
tips,
questions,
or
comments
and
follow
her
on
Twitter


Bonus Time

Enter
your
email
address
to
sign
up
for
ATL’s

Bonus
&
Salary
Increase
Alerts
.


How Appealing Weekly Roundup – Above the Law

(Image
via
Getty)




Ed.
Note
:

A
weekly
roundup
of
just
a
few
items
from
Howard
Bashman’s

How
Appealing
blog
,
the
Web’s
first
blog
devoted
to
appellate
litigation.
Check
out
these
stories
and
more
at
How
Appealing.


“Republican
states
can
move
ahead
with
abortion
pill
lawsuit
in
Texas”:
 Brendan
Pierson
and
Nate
Raymond
of
Reuters
have this
report
.


“Biden
administration
will
leave
it
to
Trump
to
implement
TikTok
ban;
The
ban
goes
into
effect
on
Sunday
unless
the
Supreme
Court
intervenes”:
 Elizabeth
Schulze,
Devin
Dwyer,
and
Steven
Portnoy
of
ABC
News
have this
report
.


“A.G.
Garland
withdraws
federal
execution
drug
protocol
following
review;
‘[T]here
is
significant
uncertainty
about
whether
the
use
of
pentobarbital
as
a
single-drug
lethal
injection
for
execution
treats
individuals
humanely,’
Garland
wrote”:
 Chris
Geidner
has this
post
 at
his
Substack
site.


“Riggs,
Griffin
spar
over
proper
forum
for
NC
Supreme
Court
election
dispute”:
 The
Carolina
Journal
has this
report
.


“Arkansas
Supreme
Court
administrator
asks
chief
justice
to
stay
away,
pending
disciplinary
review;
Request
is
latest
stumble
in
rocky
start
for
Chief
Justice
Karen
Baker”:
 Sonny
Albarado
of
Arkansas
Advocate
has this
report
.


“Cookies,
Cocktails
and
Mushrooms
on
the
Menu
as
Justices
Hear
Bank
Fraud
Case;
In
trying
to
find
the
line
between
false
statements
and
misleading
ones
in
the
case
of
a
Chicago
politician,
members
of
the
Supreme
Court
posed
colorful
questions”:
 Adam
Liptak
of
The
New
York
Times
has this
report
.

Adjunct Law Professors May Have Limitations – Above the Law

Several
years
ago,
I
wrote
an
article

arguing
that
law
schools
should
have
more
adjunct
professors

so
that
law
students
can
learn
legal
subjects
from
professors
who
actively
practice
law.
As
a
law
student,
I
had
excellent
adjunct
professors,
and
law
schools
might
even
save
money
if
they
rely
more
on
part-time
professors
rather
than
hire
additional
full-time
educators.
Recently,
I
was
speaking
with
a
colleague
about
our
favorite
law
school
professors,
and
this
colleague
conveyed
that
adjunct
professors
often
had
significant
limitations.
This
reminded
me
of
my
own
experiences
with
law
school
adjunct
professors,
and
law
schools
likely
cannot
rely
intensely
on
adjuncts
in
order
to
fill
their
professor
ranks.

Nearly
all
of
the
adjunct
professors
I
know
have
full-time
jobs
elsewhere.
It
is
well-known
that
adjunct
professors
earn
low
compensation
from
their
teaching,
and
most
of
their
income
comes
from
their
full-time
jobs.
As
a
result,
adjunct
professors
often
do
not
prioritize
teaching
over
other
career
obligations.
This
is
especially
true
when
an
adjunct
professor
runs
into
conflicts
that
make
it
difficult
to
complete
tasks
associated
with
being
an
adjunct
and
a
practicing
lawyer
at
the
same
time.

For
instance,
while
I
was
in
law
school,
I
had
an
adjunct
professor
who
was
a
partner
at
a
top
law
firm.
During
the
class,
the
adjunct
professor
told
us
that
he
had
to
begin
a
trial
and
that
his
attention
would
be
focused
more
on
the
trial
until
the
matter
resolved.
During
that
time,
the
professor
was
much
harder
to
reach,
and
a
few
times,
classes
needed
to
be
rescheduled
to
accommodate
his
trial
schedule.
The
case
eventually
resolved,
and
the
adjunct
was
much
more
present
thereafter,
but
our
learning
experience
was
impacted
for
weeks
while
he
juggled
his
responsibilities
as
trial
counsel
with
his
responsibilities
as
an
adjunct
professor.

Adjunct
professors
might
also
be
more
difficult
to
reach
for
office
hours
or
other
outside-the-classroom
reasons.
This
might
be
due
to
the
fact
that
adjunct
professors
do
not
always
have
offices
on
campus
like
other
professors
and
may
not
be
required
to
keep
regular
office
hours
as
is
often
the
policy
of
full-time
professors.
Adjunct
law
professors
might
also
simply
just
have
less
free
time
to
interact
with
students
since
they
need
to
handle
work
responsibilities
as
well
as
teaching
duties.

When
I
was
a
law
student,
one
of
my
favorite
adjunct
professors
lived
in
a
different
city
and
commuted
once
a
week
to
the
law
school
to
teach
our
class.
The
professor
did
a
great
job
teaching,
but
due
to
the
distance
the
professor
traveled
to
get
to
class,
I
rarely
interacted
with
this
professor
outside
of
class
as
I
commonly
did
with
full-time
professors.
When
law
students
do
not
have
the
ability
to
interact
with
professors
outside
of
the
classroom,
it
is
more
difficult
to
seek
out
letters
of
recommendation,
career
advice,
or
leads
on
job
opportunities.

Don’t
get
me
wrong,
I
also
had
adjunct
professors
that
did
such
a
good
job
you
would
never
believe
they
had
a
full-time
job
outside
of
teaching.
For
instance,
I
had
one
adjunct
law
professor
who
spent
as
much
time
as
possible
on
campus,
responded
to
student
inquiries
in
a
timely
fashion,
and
graded
final
exams
before
even
my
full-time
professors
had
the
chance
to
upload
their
grades.
However,
adjunct
professors
might
not
be
able
to
provide
the
same
level
of
attention
as
full-time
professors
can.
As
a
result,
law
schools
need
to
have
a
balanced
roster
and
vet
adjunct
professors
to
ensure
that
they
have
the
least
chance
possible
of
letting
their
full-time
pursuits
interfere
with
their
teaching
duties.




Rothman Larger HeadshotJordan
Rothman
is
a
partner
of




The
Rothman
Law
Firm
,
a
full-service
New
York
and
New
Jersey
law
firm.
He
is
also
the
founder
of




Student
Debt
Diaries
,
a
website
discussing
how
he
paid
off
his
student
loans.
You
can
reach
Jordan
through
email
at





[email protected]
.

Tom Goldstein Hires Trump’s Lawyers In First Good Bet In Years – Above the Law

Where
does
one
turn
if
you’re
a
prominent
defendant
who
allegedly
lost
massive
amounts
of
money
on
poorly
conceived
bets,
engaged
in
false
bookkeeping,
misled
lending
banks,
while
paying
off
the
multiple
women
he
had
affairs
with?

The
correct
answer
is
Donald
Trump’s
defense
team,
whose
client
managed
to
embody
ALL
of
that
criminal
activity
(and
more!)
and
slide
right
out
of
it
unscathed.
And
sucking
up
to
lawyers
with
the
president’s
ear
when
it
comes
time
to
beg
for
a
pardon
is
at
least
as
useful
as
writing

an
obsequious
essay

in
the
New
York
Times
about
winning
Wisconsin
being
basically
the
same
as
an
acquittal.

Supreme
Court
litigator
and
SCOTUSblog
co-founder
Tom
Goldstein
found
himself
on
the
wrong
end
of
a

harsh
criminal
indictment
yesterday
.
The
allegations
of
high
stakes
gambling,
$15+
million
in
personal
debts,
and
paying
four
mistresses
from
the
firm
coffers
approached
“Wayne
Brady
on
Chappelle’s
Show”
levels
of
surprising
pimp
turns.
Josh
Blackman
has
a
piece
in
the
Volokh
Conspiracy
today

comparing
Goldstein’s
oral
arguments
before
the
Supreme
Court
with
the
timeline
of
the
indictment

and
suggests
that
he
was
losing
millions
and
then
turning
around
and
arguing
twice
before
the
Supreme
Court
in
the
course
of
a
month
all
while
juggling
multiple
relationships
and,
folks,
this
is
what
peak
performance
looks
like.

Facing
all
these
charges,
the
self-professed
Democrat

as
of
his
NYT
essay
arguing
that
the
criminal
justice
system
should
yield
to
the
electoral
college

ran
right
to
Trump’s
team.

Lauro
and
Kise,
probably
the
only
personal
Trump
lawyers
who
aren’t
expected
to
take
over
the
Justice
Department,
successfully
ran
out
the
clock
on
Trump’s
various
criminal
cases.
While
Kise stumbled
in
the
New
York
hush
money
case,
it
didn’t
matter
when
the
court
sentenced
Trump
to
the
criminal
justice
equivalent
of
a
divorced
dad
handing
his
kid
two
bottles
of
Jack
and
the
keys
to
his
car.
Meanwhile,
in
the
D.C.
interference
case,
the
Supreme
Court
delivered
a
solid
for
the
team
in
rewriting
the
Constitution
to

retroactively
legalize
coups

and
in
the
Florida
classified
documents
case

Aileen
Cannon
did
Aileen
Cannon
stuff
.
All
in
all,
a
pretty
successful
run.

Which
is
not
necessarily
a
knock
on
their
lawyering
skills
in
a
straight
up
litigation

it’s

comically
clear
Kise
wasn’t
in
full
control
of
the
New
York
case


but
as
they
say,
good
lawyers
know
the
law
and
great
lawyers
know
someone
with
federal
pardon
power.

Making
this

if
the
indictment
is
to
be
believed

the
best
bet
Goldstein’s
made
in
awhile.


Earlier
:

SCOTUSblog
Founder
Indicted
In
Wild
Poker-Fueled
Tax
Case




HeadshotJoe
Patrice
 is
a
senior
editor
at
Above
the
Law
and
co-host
of

Thinking
Like
A
Lawyer
.
Feel
free
to email
any
tips,
questions,
or
comments.
Follow
him
on Twitter or

Bluesky

if
you’re
interested
in
law,
politics,
and
a
healthy
dose
of
college
sports
news.
Joe
also
serves
as
a

Managing
Director
at
RPN
Executive
Search
.