Neighbour jailed for inserting finger into 4-year-old girl’s privates, rape

MUTARE

A
36-year-old
Mutare
man
raped
and
on
a
different
occasion,
inserted
his
finger
into
his
4-year-old
victim’s
privates,
a
court
heard
recently.

The
Sakubva,
Mutare
resident,
was
charged
and
convicted
for
rape
and
aggravated
indecent
assault.

According
to
the
National
Prosecuting
Authority
of
Zimbabwe
(NPAZ),
the
abuse
happened
on
23
March,
2025
at
around
4PM.

“The
young
girl
was
playing
outside
her
home
when
the
offender,
who
lived
nearby,
called
her
into
his
house.
He
was
alone
at
the
time.
Once
inside,
he
removed
the
child’s
clothing
and
proceeded
to
rape
her,”
NPAZ
said.

“In
a
separate
instance
within
the
same
timeframe,
he
also
committed
an
act
of
aggravated
indecent
assault
by
inserting
his
finger
into
her
privates.

“The
child
cried
out,
and
the
offender
then
lifted
her
and
placed
her
on
his
lap.
The
victim,
upon
hearing
her
mother
calling,
went
to
her
naked
and
disclosed
what
had
happened.”

The
abuse
was
promptly
reported
to
the
police
with
a
medical
examination
report
later
confirming
the
violation.

The
report
was
presented
in
court
as
evidence.

For
his
misdeeds,
the
offender
was
convicted
and
sentenced
to
30
years
imprisonment
by
the
Mutare
Magistrates’
Court.

Tension rise as Zambians block Zimbabweans at Chirundu border


28.4.2025


17:13

A
tense
standoff
has
erupted
at
the
Chirundu
Border
Post,
where
Zambian
nationals
are
reportedly
blocking
Zimbabweans
from
entering
Zambia.



The
reasons
behind
the
protest
are
still
unfolding,
but
the
situation
has
caused
major
disruptions
at
one
of
the
region’s
busiest
border
points.
Authorities
from
both
countries
are
reportedly
engaging
to
resolve
the
impasse
peacefully.


More
updates
to
follow
as
the
story
develops.


Zim
Observer
‘s
Post

Post
published
in:

Featured

The Worst 100 Days Of A Presidency – Above the Law

I’m
jumping
the
gun. The
100th
day
of
Donald
Trump’s
presidency
is
actually
tomorrow,
April
29. But
I
have
a
Monday
column
here
at
Above
the
Law,
so
I’m
celebrating
early.

I
ask
you
this: What
president
had
the
worst
first
100
days
of
his
presidency?

And
I
answer,
without
hesitation
.
.
.
.
May
I
have
a
drum
roll,
please?

Abraham
Lincoln,
of
course.

Don’t
be
silly
about
this.  

Between
Lincoln’s
election
(in
November
1860)
and
inauguration
(in
March
1861),
seven
states
seceded
from
the
Union. Four
more
states
seceded
in
the
first
100
days
after
Lincoln’s
inauguration. The
First
Battle
of
Bull
Run

the
initial
full-scale
battle
of
the
Civil
War

was
fought
on
July
21,
1861. Since
Lincoln’s
first
100
days
would
have
expired
on
June
12,
I
can’t
legitimately
include
Bull
Run
in
my
litany. But
Lincoln’s
first
100
days
were
unimaginably
bad.

Hey! We’ve
denied
Trump
a
boast! He
can’t
say
that
“I
had
the
most
remarkable
first
100
days
of
any
president!” 

The
truth
is
this: Trump
ranks
second
in
the
list
of
presidents’
worst
100
days.

Why?

Start
with
the
permanent
damage
that
Trump
has
inflicted
on
the
security
of
the
world. Trump
has
let
NATO
know
that
the
United
States
can’t
be
trusted
as
an
ally. Trump
has
said
explicitly
that
the
United
States
will
not
defend
countries
that
don’t
meet
their
defense
spending
targets
and
that
the
United
States
may
withdraw
entirely
from
NATO. Trump
has
thus
undermined
the
credibility
of
the
alliance
that
has
maintained
the
world’s
peace
for
the
past
80
years.

This
has
real
consequences. Trump’s
words
shatter
European
faith
in
NATO. His
words
may
cause
more
European
countries
to
develop
nuclear
weapons. His
words
increase
the
likelihood
that
Russia
will
attack
one
of
the
smaller
members
of
the
alliance.

And
Trump’s
words
resonate
beyond
Europe. If
NATO
can’t
trust
the
United
States
as
an
ally,
why
should
any
other
country? South
Korea,
or
Taiwan,
or
Japan
are
all
technologically
advanced
countries
with
the
capacity
to
build
nuclear
weapons. Absent
confidence
in
America,
they
may
choose
to
develop
their
own
nuclear
deterrents. Once
the
Pandora’s
Box
of
nuclear
proliferation
has
been
opened,
it
won’t
close
easily.

Trump
compounded
this
problem
by
abandoning
Ukraine
in
its
war
against
Russia. This
again
proved
that
the
U.S.
is
not
a
reliable
ally. Abandoning
Ukraine
rewarded
Russia
for
its
aggression
against
another
country
and
encouraged
Russia
to
seek
more
territorial
conquest
in
Europe. It
emboldened
China
in
its
quest
for
Taiwan. And
the
abandonment
relinquished
an
opportunity
to
degrade
Russia’s
military
at
a
cost
of
only
American
weapons,
not
lives.

Other
than
that,
Trump’s
decision
was
a
good
one.

But
that’s
just
the
beginning
of
what
Trump
accomplished
in
his
first
100
days.

Trump
also
destroyed
the
world’s
faith
in
the
United
States
as
a
trading
partner. Trump
invoked
national
security
exceptions
to
the
United
States-Mexico-Canada
Agreement
(the
successor
to
NAFTA)
in
a
transparent
ruse
to
evade
that
agreement
(which
the
Trump
administration
itself
negotiated
during
Trump’s
first
term). Trump
has
imposed
wholesale
tariffs
on
countries
around
the
world,
which
are
widely
viewed
as
violations
of
the
World
Trade
Organization’s
rules. And
any
rational
country
now
knows
it
would
be
insane
to
rely
on
the
United
States
as
a
trading
partner,
because
the
United
States
could,
in
the
future,
stab
other
countries
in
the
back
by
imposing
tariffs
or
restricting
trade
for
any
reason,
or
no
reason
at
all. Countries
will
diversify
their
trading
partners,
and
the
U.S.
will
suffer
from
that
diversification
for
a
long,
long
time.

You’re
seeing
the
“sell
America”
trade

American
stocks,
bonds,
and
the
value
of
the
dollar
all
losing
value
simultaneously

as
a
result
of
this
lost
confidence
in
the
United
States. It
took
decades
to
build
up
trust
in
the
U.S. It
took
only
weeks
to
destroy
that
confidence. And
nothing
that
Trump
can
say
or
do
will
restore
America’s
place
in
the
world. Trump
has
proven
that
he’s
unreliable;
that
reputation
won’t
go
away.

For
a
list
of
early
accomplishments
in
a
presidential
administration,
those
two
would
be
plenty. But
Trump
destroyed
the
world’s
respect
for
the
United
States
in
other
ways. Trump
threatened
to
turn
Canada
into
America’s
51st
state,
and
he
threatened
to
take
over
Greenland
by
force. If
Trump
actually
intends
to
do
these
things,
then
the
United
States
has
become
a
rogue
superpower,
no
longer
governed
by
any
world
order. If
Trump
doesn’t
intend
to
do
these
things,
then
Trump
is
an
idiot
for
having
suggested
them,
even
in
jest.

What’s
done
often
can’t
be
undone. Now
that
the
world
doesn’t
trust
us,
it
may
take
decades
to
restore
faith
in
America.

Those
things
are
just
the
permanent
damage
that
Trump
has
done
to
the
world
order
and
the
standing
of
the
United
States. He’s
done
some
other
stuff
that
is
moronic
but
wouldn’t
otherwise
make
his
first
100
days
list. Trump
has
threatened
to
ignore
court
orders,
raising
the
possibility
of
a
full-fledged
constitutional
crisis. The
Department
of
Homeland
Security
is,
with
no
semblance
of
due
process,
deporting
folks. Trump’s
attacking
law
firms;
he’s
attacking
academic
freedom
at
universities;
he’s
attacking
the
system
by
which
medical
research
is
financed. Trump
pardoned
the
criminals
who
ransacked
the
Capitol
Building
on
January
6,
2021. Either
those
folks
attacked
the
Capitol
without
Trump’s
encouragement,
in
which
case
they
belong
in
prison,
or
they
attacked
the
Capitol
with
Trump’s
encouragement,
in
which
case
Trump
belongs
behind
bars
with
them. Trump
appointed
people
to
his
Cabinet
who
were
unqualified
to
begin
with
(RFK
Jr.;
Tulsi
Gabbard;
Pete
Hegseth)
and
who
have
since
confirmed
their
ineptitude
(by,
for
example,
distributing
military
attack
plans
on
a
commercial
messaging
app
to
folks
with
no
need
to
know
this
information). Trump
stands
by
this
ineptitude,
because
Trump’s
show
of
strength
lets
his
base
know
that
Trump
owns
the
libs,
even
if
Trump
also
owns
the
stupidity. 

But
I’m
not
one
to
suffer
from
Trump
Derangement
Syndrome. I
acknowledge
that
Trump
did
some
good
stuff
in
his
first
100
days. Getting
rid
of
the
penny
is
a
great
idea. (It
makes
cents.)

Consider
one
distinction
between
Lincoln
and
Trump’s
first
100
days. All
of
the
disastrous
events
of
Lincoln’s
first
100
days
were
outside
of
Lincoln’s
control. Lincoln
didn’t
secede;
southern
states
did. Conversely,
all
of
the
disastrous
events
during
Trump’s
first
100
days
were
entirely
of
Trump’s
volition. Trump
chose
to
withdraw
from
NATO;
Trump
chose
to
begin
a
trade
war;
Trump
chose
to
threaten
to
disobey
court
orders.

My
God! Bull
Run
didn’t
occur
until
about
the
120th
day
of
Lincoln’s
presidency. Where
will
we
be
by
(checks
calendar)
the
end
of
May?





















Mark Herrmann spent
17
years
as
a
partner
at
a
leading
international
law
firm
and
later
oversaw
litigation,
compliance
and
employment
matters
at
a
large
international
company.
He
is
the
author
of 
The
Curmudgeon’s
Guide
to
Practicing
Law
 and Drug
and
Device
Product
Liability
Litigation
Strategy
 (affiliate
links).
You
can
reach
him
by
email
at 
[email protected].

Legal Ethics Roundup: FBI Arrests Judge – AG Hints at More, Prosecutors Resign, Trump Org Fires Ethics Atty & More – Above the Law



Ed.
note
:
Please
welcome
Renee
Knake
Jefferson
back
to
the
pages
of
Above
the
Law.
Subscribe
to
her
Substack,
Legal
Ethics
Roundup, here.


Welcome
to
what
captivates,
haunts,
inspires,
and
surprises
me
every
week
in
the
world
of
legal
ethics.


Happy
Monday! 
Hope
you
are
enjoying
the
longer
days
of
sunshine
as
summer
approaches.
I’ve
already
started
working
on
the
LER
Second
Annual
Legal
Ethics
Summer
Reading
List.
You’ll
find
a
preview
below.
But
first,
let’s
turn
to
the
headlines.

Highlights
from
Last
Week –
Top
Fifteen
Headlines


#1
Judge
Arrested
by
FBI;
AG
“Hints”
at
More. 
Three
headlines
for
#1. First,
from
the AP:
“The
FBI
on
Friday
arrested
a
Milwaukee
judge
accused
of
helping
a
man
evade
immigration
authorities,
escalating
a
clash
between
the
Trump
administration
and
local
authorities
over
the
Republican
president’s
sweeping
immigration
crackdown. Milwaukee
County
Circuit
Court
Judge
Hannah
Dugan
 is
accused
of
escorting
the
man
and
his
lawyer
out
of
her
courtroom
through
the
jury
door
last
week
after
learning
that
immigration
authorities
were
seeking
his
arrest.
The
man
was
taken
into
custody
outside
the
courthouse
after
agents
chased
him
on
foot.”
Read
more here. Second,
from
the HuffPost:
Attorney
General
Pam
Bondi
 hinted
at
hunting
down
more
judges
hours
after
a
Wisconsin
judge
was
arrested
for
allegedly
helping
an
undocumented
immigrant
evade
arrest.”
Read
more hereThird, from National
Public
Radio
,
quoting
Wisconsin
Democratic
state
lawmaker Ryan
Clancy
:
“This
is
incredibly
unprecedented.
A
functioning
democracy
does
not
arrest
sitting
judges
for
doing
their
job.”
Listen here.



#2
“Solicitor
General
John
Sauer’s
Predicament.”
 From Jack
Goldsmith
 (Harvard)
at Executive
Functions
:
“The
SG’s
Office
has
a
special
relationship
to
the
Court,
including
special
obligations
and
practices,
that
are
part
of
the
culture
of
the
office
and
are
the
sources
of
its
extraordinary
influence.
No
SG
should
want
to
depart
from
these
customs
or
give
up
this
influence.
This
essay
is
about
why
the
SG’s
traditional
role
is
under
unprecedented
pressure
in
Trump
2.0.
We
are
about
to
find
out
whether
the
new
SG—John
Sauer
—can
maintain
the
SG’s
traditional
stance
toward
the
Court
while
catering
to
the
wishes
of
the
president
and
the
White
House.”
Read
more here.



#3
“Angst
Builds
Inside
Federal
Agency
Over
Trump’s
Moves
Against
Law
Firms.”
 From
the New
York
Times
:
“The
primary
federal
regulator
of
workplace
discrimination
has
become
a
powerful
tool
in
President
Trump’s
assault
on
some
of
the
nation’s
biggest
law
firms
and
is
upending
the
agency’s
traditional
role
in
enforcing
civil
rights
laws
and
upsetting
its
staff.”
Read
more here.



#4
AI
Strikes
Again

Fake
Bar
Exam
Questions
and
Fake
Case
Citations.
 Two
headlines
for
#4:.First, from The Guardian:
“The State
Bar
of
California
 has
disclosed
that
some
multiple-choice
questions
in
a
problem-plagued
bar
exam
were
developed
with
the
aid
of
artificial
intelligence.
The
legal
licensing
body
said
in
news
release
 on
Monday
that
it
will
ask
the
California
supreme
court
to
adjust
test
scores
for
those
who
took
its
February
bar
exam.
‘The
debacle
that
was
the
February
2025
bar
exam
is
worse
than
we
imagined,’ Mary
Basick
,
assistant
dean
of
academic
skills
at
the
University
of
California,
Irvine,
School
of
Law,
told
the
Los
Angeles
Times.
‘I’m
almost
speechless.
Having
the
questions
drafted
by
non-lawyers
using
artificial
intelligence
is
just
unbelievable.’”
Read
more hereSecond, from KDVR
Denver
:
“MyPillow
CEO Mike
Lindell
 and
his
legal
team
have
to
explain
themselves
to
a
federal
judge
in
Colorado
after
she
discovered
a
recent
brief
they
submitted
pointed
to
fake
court
cases
as
evidence.
The
brief
was
submitted
as
part
of
an ongoing
defamation
case
 involving
a
former
executive
at Dominion
Voting
Systems
 that
was
filed
against
Lindell
in
2022.
According
to
court
documents,
federal
judge Nina
Wang
 found
about
30
defective
citations
in
a
brief
Lindell’s
legal
team
filed
in
February.
The
defects
range
from
misquotes
to
‘citations
of
cases
that
do
not
exist.’”
Read
more here.



#5
“Trump
Executive
Order
Says
ABA’s
Role
as
Law
School
Accreditor
May
Be
Revoked.”
 From Reuters:
“The
Trump
Administration
said
in
an
executive
order
on
Wednesday
that
it
is
considering
revoking
the
American
Bar
Association’s
status
as
the
federally
recognized
accreditor
of
law
schools,
a
change
that
could
impact
lawyer
licensing,
student
loans
and
attorney
mobility,
legal
education
experts
said.”
Read
more here.
Read
the
full
EO here.




#6
“3
More
Prosecutors
Resign
Over
Eric
Adams
Corruption
Case.”
 From The
Hill
:
“Three
additional
federal
prosecutors
have
resigned
from
the
U.S.
attorney’s
office
in
the
Southern
District
of
New
York
in
the
aftermath
of
the
Department
of
Justice
(DOJ)
dropping
its
case
against New
York
City
Mayor
Eric
Adams
 (D). Celia
Cohen
Andrew
Rohrbach
 and Derek
Wikstrom
 sent
a
letter
to Deputy
Attorney
General
Todd
Blanche
 on
Tuesday
accusing
the
DOJ
of
requiring
them
to
“express
regret
and
admit
some
wrongdoing”
in
refusing
to
move
to
drop
the
case
in
exchange
for
being
restored
from
administrative
leave,
multiple
outlets
reported.The
three
prosecutors
wrote
they
have
served
under
presidents
of
both
parties
and
have
advanced
their
priorities
while
pursuing
justice.
They
said
prosecutors
don’t
set
policy
but
must
follow
the
Constitution
and
the
country’s
laws,
benefiting
the
public
in
giving
it
faith
in
the
justice
system,
the
department
in
having
credibility
and
the
prosecutors
in
being
able
to
‘ethically
carry
out
their
duties.’
‘Now,
the
Department
has
decided
that
obedience
supersedes
all
else,
requiring
us
to
abdicate
our
legal
and
ethical
obligations
in
favor
of
directions
from
Washington,’
they
said.
‘That
is
wrong.’”
Read
more here.




#7
“Judges
Appear
Receptive
to
Blocking
Trump’s
Orders
Targeting
Big
Law
Firms.”
 From
the New
York
Times
:
“Two
federal
judges
on
Wednesday
appeared
sympathetic
to
arguments
from
elite
law
firms
asking
for
definitive
relief
from
President
Trump’s
executive
orders
targeting
them.
Lawyers
for
two
firms, Perkins
Coie
 and WilmerHale,
have
asked
the
courts
to
permanently
block
the
Trump
administration
from
carrying
out
the
orders,
arguing
that
the
measures
are
so
blatantly
unconstitutional
that
no
trial
is
necessary.
The
orders,
they
stressed,
pose
a
critical
threat
to
their
businesses
and
the
legal
profession
writ
large.
The
firms
have
clients
and
have
employed
lawyers
Mr.
Trump
opposes
politically.
The
judges
presiding
over
their
cases, Beryl
A.
Howell
 and Richard
J.
Leon
 of
the
Federal
District
Court
in
Washington,
said
they
would
take
some
time
to
reach
a
final
decision.
But
both
appeared
receptive
to
the
firms’
position
that
Mr.
Trump
was
retaliating
against
them
for
speech
he
does
not
like.”
Read
more here (gift
link).



#8
“Trump
Organization
Fires
Its
Ethics
Attorney

After
Harvard
Hired
Him
To
Help
With
Lawsuit.”
 From Forbes:
“The
Trump
Organization
fired
its
ethics
attorney William
Burck
 on
Thursday
for
representing
Harvard
University
in
its
lawsuit
against
the
government,
CNN
reports,
after President
Donald
Trump
 suggested
it
on
Truth
Social,
raising
questions
about
the
president’s
independence
from
his
business
empire—which
is
exactly
what
Burck’s
appointment
was
supposed
to
avoid.”
Read
more here.



#9
“Maine
Lawyer
Tries
to
Get
Federal
Government
Lawyer
Investigated
for
Litigating
Government’s
Claim
Related
to
Transgender
Athletes.”
 From The
Volokh
Conspiracy
:
“A
federal
judge
has
denied
a
motion
from
a
Maine
lawyer
asking
for
a
special
counsel
to
investigate
the
attorney
representing
the
federal
government
in
its
Title
IX
lawsuit
against
the
Maine
Department
Education.”
Read
more here.



#10
“Democrats
Demand
Law
Firms
Turn
Over
Details
on
Deals
With
Trump.”
 From
the Newsweek:
“More
than
a
dozen
Democratic
members
of
Congress
have
sent
letters
to
nine
major
law
firms
who
struck
deals
with
the
Trump
administration,
demanding
further
details
on
their
agreements.
The
lawmakers
want
more
answers,
as
they
say
the
deals,
‘pose
a
serious
threat
to
the
integrity
and
independence
of
our
judicial
system
and
the
administration
of
justice,’
according
to
a
statement
from
the
office
of
Democratic U.S.
Representative
April
McClain
Delaney
of
Maryland.

Read
more here.



#11
“Many
Big
Law
Firms
Shun
Conservative
Clients.”
 From John
Greil
 (Texas)
in
the Wall
Street
Journal
:
“More
than
500
law
firms
recently
signed
a
court
brief
denouncing President
Trump’s
 executive
orders
targeting Perkins
Coie
 and
other
firms
for
representing
causes
that
Mr.
Trump
opposes.
The
brief
invokes
the Supreme
Court’s
 admirable
maxim:
‘The
courage
of
attorneys
who
take
on
unpopular
clients
has
long
made
lawyerdom
proud.’
But
that
courage
often
goes
only
in
one
direction.
For
years,
some
of
America’s
biggest
law
firms
have
been
unwilling
to
represent
conservative
clients
whose
beliefs
run
against
the
elite
liberal
consensus.
This
imbalance
hurts
reputations—and
compromises
the
rule
of
law.

Universities
serve
as
helpful
examples
for
what
law
firms
should
and
shouldn’t
do.
Public
trust
in
higher
education
has
plunged—from
57%
to
36%
since
2015—largely
due
to
perceived
political
bias.
Some
schools
have
responded
prudently
by
adopting
institutional
neutrality.
While
individual
professors
and
students
may
speak
freely,
university
administrations
don’t
take
sides
on
controversial
social
and
political
issues
that
are
unrelated
to
their
core
mission.
The
policy
keeps
the
institution
above
the
fray.
Law
firms
should
do
the
same.
Let
lawyers
take
the
cases
they
believe
in—without
the
firm
itself
taking
sides.
The
legal
profession
rightly
honors
those
who
represent
unpopular
clients.
This
should
include
clients
from
across
the
political
spectrum.
It’s
time
for
America’s
biggest
law
firms
to
make
lawyerdom
proud
again.”
Read
more here (gift
link).



#12
Reasonable
Fees

“Is
The
‘Prevailing
Party’
Over
For
Civil
Rights
Attys?” 
From Law360:
“The
U.S.
Supreme
Court’s
ruling
that
preliminary
injunctions
don’t
entitle
civil
rights
plaintiffs
to
recoup
attorney
fees
was
partly
an
attempt
to
reduce
lengthy
fee
litigation,
but
it
may
have
also
reduced
litigants’
ability
to
vindicate
their
rights
in
court.”
Read
more here.



#13
“The
Untold
Story
of
How
Ed
Martin
Ghostwrote
Online
Attacks
Against
a
Judge

and
Still
Became
a
Top
Trump
Prosecutor.”
 From ProPublica:
“Legal
experts
told
ProPublica
that
Martin’s
conduct
in
the
Eagle
Forum
case
was
a
clear
violation
of
ethical
norms
and
professional
rules.
Martin’s
behavior,
they
said,
was
especially
egregious
because
he
was
both
a
defendant
in
the
case
and
a
licensed
attorney.
Martin
appeared
to
be
‘deliberately
interfering
with
a
judicial
proceeding
with
the
intent
to
undermine
the
integrity
of
the
outcome,’
said Scott
Cummings
,
a
professor
of
legal
ethics
at
UCLA
School
of
Law.
‘That’s
not
OK.’
Martin
did
not
respond
to
multiple
requests
for
comment.
Martin’s
legal
and
political
career
is
dotted
with
questions
about
his
professional
and
ethical
conduct.
But
for
all
his
years
in
the
spotlight,
some
of
the
most
serious
concerns
about
his
conduct
have
remained
in
the
shadows

buried
in
court
filings,
overlooked
by
the
press
or
never
reported
at
all.”
Read
more here



#14
“Colorado
Ethics
Panel:
Judge
Cannot
Drive
Car
Advertising
Wife’s
Law
Firm,
May
‘Occasionally’
Ride
In
It.”
 From Colorado
Politics
:
“A
judge
whose
wife
works
at
a
law
firm
may
not
drive
a
car
that
has
the
firm’s
logo
affixed
to
the
side,
nor
may
he
park
the
vehicle
in
front
of
his
home,
the
state’s
judicial
ethics
panel
advised
last
week.
The
judge
may,
however,
ride
as
a
passenger
‘occasionally,’
the
panel
added.
The Colorado
Judicial
Ethics
Advisory
Board
,
which
consists
of
judges,
lawyers
and
a
non-attorney,
cited
multiple
reasons
why
the
judge’s
affiliation
with
the
promotional
vehicle
would
be
problematic,
including
the
perception
that
the
specific
law
firm
is
in
a
position
to
influence
the
judge.”
Read
more here



#15
International
Perspectives
 “Criminalizing
the
Legal
Profession.”
 From Verfassungsblog:
“Lawyers
and
bar
associations
in
Turkey
have
long
faced
political
and
legal
pressure.
The
court
case
against
the Istanbul
Bar
Association
 that
led
to
the
dismissal
of
its
executive
board
and
the
criminal
prosecution
of
board
members
is
another
troubling
instance
of
such
pressure.
While
the
case
may
seem
as
an
isolated
legal
dispute,
it
reflects
a
broader
effort
by
the
Turkish
government
to
silence
dissenting
voices,
dismantle
the
rule
of
law,
and
target
institutions
that
remain
committed
to
defending
democratic
values.
The
case
exemplifies
how
authoritarian
regimes
increasingly
criminalise
lawyers
and
professional
organisations
that
speak
out
against
rights
violations.
By
situating
the
case
within
both
national
and
international
trends
of
authoritarianism,
we
aim
to
underscore
the
vital
role
of
lawyers
and
bar
associations
in
defending
human
rights,
access
to
justice,
and
democratic
principles—often
at
great
personal
and
institutional
risk”
Read
more here.


Summer
Reading
List
Preview

At
the
end
of
May,
I’ll
bring
you
the LER
Second
Annual
Legal
Ethics
Summer
Reading
List
.
As
you
might
recall
from last
year’s
list
,
this
isn’t
just
limited
to
law-related
books!
This
week
I’m
sharing
a
sneak
preview
of
the
list,
which
will
feature The
Book
of
Alchemy:
A
Creative
Practice
for
an
Inspired
Life
 by Suleika
Jaouad
 along
with
more
than
a
dozen
other
recommendations.
The
Book
of
Alchemy
hit
the
shelves
last
week
on
April
22,
which
happens
to
also
be
the
birthday
of
my
labradoodle, Rilke.
I
loved
opening
the
*gorgeous*
cover
to
discover
on
the
first
page the
very
quote
that
inspired
my
dog’s
name
.
Happy
fifth
birthday
to
Rilke
and
happy
book
launch
to
Suleika!



Do
you
have
suggestions
for
summer
reading?
 Send
them
my
way

see
below
under
“Keep
in
Touch.”


Where’s
the
Rest
of
the
Roundup?

Revisit
the “Welcome
Back
Edition”
 for
an
explanation
of
the
new
format.
And
keep
an
eye
out
for
next
month’s
“First
Monday
Edition”
with
reading
recommendations,
analysis,
reforms
watch,
jobs,
events,
and
much
more.


Looking
for
the
Legal
Ethics
&
Democracy
Tracker?

You’ll
find
it here.
New
additions
this
week
include
the Amicus
Brief
from
775
Law
Professors
on
Behalf
of
Susman
Godfrey
.


Get
Hired

Did
you
miss
the
100+
job
postings
from
previous
weeks?
Find
them
all here.


Upcoming
Ethics
Events
&
Other
Announcements

Did
you
miss
an
announcement
from
previous
weeks?
Find
them
all here.


Keep
in
Touch




Renee
Knake
Jefferson
holds
the
endowed
Doherty
Chair
in
Legal
Ethics
and
is
a
Professor
of
Law
at
the
University
of
Houston.
Check
out
more
of
her
writing
at
the Legal
Ethics
Roundup
.
Find
her
on
X
(formerly
Twitter)
at @reneeknake or
Bluesky
at legalethics.bsky.social

There’s a Gap Between Healthcare Leaders’ AI Confidence and Their Ability to Scale – MedCity News

Many
providers
express
confidence
about
their
AI
strategy,
but
relatively
few
have
established
the
governance
structures
needed
to
ensure
responsible
AI
deployment,
according
to
new
research.


Nordic
Consulting

released
a

report

this
month
based
on
a
survey
of
127
leaders
who
work
at
healthcare
organizations,
mainly
hospitals
and
clinics.
The
results
showed
that
70%
of
leaders feel
at
least
somewhat
confident
in
their
organization’s
AI
governance
frameworks,
but
only
15%
report
having
scalable
infrastructure
in
place.

While
there’s
significant
enthusiasm
about
AI,
scaling
it
across
a
healthcare
enterprise
is
proving
to
be
an
incredibly
complex
process,
said
Kevin
Erdal,
senior
vice
president
of
transformation
and
innovation
services
at
Nordic.

To
achieve
scalability,
providers
have
to
take
a
deep
dive
into
what
“scale”
really
means
in
terms
of
sustained
use.
Many
organizations
underestimate
the
ongoing
management
needs
of
AI
models,
especially
custom
tools
that
consume
high
computing
resources,
Erdal
stated.

Data
readiness
is
also
crucial
for
AI
success,
he
pointed
out.
Many
survey
respondents
cited
the
lack
of
infrastructure
to
access
and
process
data
from
across
disparate
systems
as
a
major
barrier
to
AI
scalability,
Erdal
noted.

“It
might
be
a
scenario
in
which
you
already
have
the
data
readily
available
or
stored,
but
you
don’t
necessarily
have
the
interoperability
to
reach
out
and
grab
some
of
the
data
from
your
pertinent
systems
across
the
collective
institution.
It’s
one
thing
to
be
able
to
store
data,
and
it’s
another
to
be
able
to
process
data,”
he
explained.

When
it
comes
to
new
AI
tools
on
the
healthcare
market,
there’s
plenty
of
hype
and
flashiness

but
it’s
the
unsexy,
foundational
elements,
like
data
management
and
computing
infrastructure,
that
determine
real
victories,
Erdal
declared.

If
organizations
can’t
capture
the
right
data,
models
will
fail

no
matter
how
promising
the
technology,
he
warned.

He
also
pointed
out
that
healthcare
leaders
may
overestimate
their
AI
readiness
due
to
the
wide
availability
of
vendor
models
out
there.
In
his
eyes,
true
preparation
includes
governance,
infrastructure,
data
and

critically

change
management.

“It’s
one
thing
to
turn
a
model
on,
but
do
you
need
the
overarching
governance
to
bring
in
those
operational
users
into
that
conversation,”
Erdal
remarked.

The
change
management
process
is
often
overlooked,
and
organizations
often
fail
to
explain
the
overall
goal
of
the
technology
to
its
end
users,
he
explained.
For
instance,
if
a
hospital
deploys
an
AI
model
to
predict
no-shows,
the
organization
must
communicate
its
plan
for
what
to
do
with
that
insight,
Erdal
said.

As
AI
adoption
continues
to
evolve
in
healthcare,
success
won’t
come
from
flashy
demos

It
will
come
from
the
less
glamorous
work
like
this,
he
declared.


Photo:
erhui1979,
Getty
Images

Morning Docket: 04.28.25 – Above the Law

*
Partners
come
out
in
defense
of
Susman
Godfrey
in
suit
against
Trump.
[Reuters]

*
S&C
trying
to
downplay
their
role
as
collaborator-in-chief.
[American
Lawyer
]

*
Supreme
Court
considering
constitutionality
of
diverting
public
school
funding
to
religious
schools.
[Bloomberg
Law
News
]

*
A
look
back
at
the
journey
George
Santos
took
from
Congress
to
prison.
[AP]

*
Kneedler’s
final
argument
draws
standing
ovation
at
Supreme
Court.
[NY
Times
]

*
Nike
investors
angry
that
company
STOPPED
nonsense
Ponzi
scheme.
[Law360]

*
Canada
votes
on
whether
it
wants
to
be
the
51st
state
or
not.
[The
Walrus
]

Machete gangs wreak havoc in Entumbane, leave six injured

The
assailants
stole
belongings,
stripped
male
victims
naked
and
left
some
with
severe
injuries
requiring
hospital
treatment.

Ward
10
Councillor
Khalazani
Ndlovu
confirmed
to
CITE
the
attacks,
which
occurred
around
5pm
to
6pm
on
Thursday
and
expressed
deep
concern
over
the
rising
crime
rate
in
the
area.

“People
in
Entumbane
are
not
okay.
People
are
frightened
and
the
whole
community
is
shaken,”
Ndlovu
said.

“Residents
were
attacked
at
different
points
along
the
railway
line.
Some
were
coming
from
church,
others
from
work,
and
some
were
just
crossing
to
Richmond.
The
thieves
took
everything
they
had

phones,
clothes,
even
jackets
and
trousers.
Some
men
were
stripped
naked.”

The
councillor
added
that
while
some
women
were
spared
physical
harm,
the
robbers
threatened
to
‘chop
them’
if
they
resisted.

“In
that
afternoon,
some
women
had
their
phones
stolen.
Although
they
were
unharmed
physically,
the
thugs
told
them
they
would
have
chopped
them
but
empathised
with
them,”
Ndlovu
said.

She
added
that
residents
were
confused,
not
knowing
what
to
do
as
the
criminals
reportedly
hid
in
maize
fields,
which
lead
to
Saucerstown
suburb.

“Many
people
have
fields
along
the
railway
leading
to
Saucerstown,
which
is
where
these
thugs
are
said
to
be
hiding
with
their
machetes,”
the
councillor
said.

Ndlovu
said
three
of
the
injured
victims
were
treated
and
discharged,
while
three
others
remain
hospitalised
at
Mpilo
Central
Hospital.

The
councillor
said
she
plans
to
visit
them.

“We
are
engaging
the
police
to
find
solutions.
Maybe
warnings
should
be
issued
and
people
must
avoid
walking
near
the
railway,
especially
at
dusk,”
Ndlovu
noted.

In
an
interview
with
CITE,
one
of
the
victims,
Busani
Sibanda,
shared
his
harrowing
experience.
Sibanda
said
he
was
attacked
after
attending
a
church
service
while
searching
for
cow
dung
with
an
acquaintance
near
the
railway
line.

“My
friend
had
been
calling
me
asking
me
for
cow
dung
because
usually
there
are
some
cows
that
move
along
the
railway.
After
church
I
then
met
up
with
him
while
I
was
with
church
mates
who
then
bade
us
farewell.
After
my
church
mates
had
left,
the
thugs
emerged
from
the
maize
crops
planted
in
the
fields
and
immediately
started
attacking
and
chopping
us
with
their
machetes,”
he
narrated.

“I
don’t
know
if
they
had
been
trailing
us
and
for
how
long
they
had
been
doing
so,
so
that
they
could
attack
whoever
was
left
by
themselves.
They
succeeded
in
their
plans
as
they
left,
having
chopped
our
heads,
hands
and
legs.”

Sibanda
said
he
and
his
acquaintance
could
not
run
away
because
they
were
now
injured.

“My
leg
was
injured
and
painful.
The
thieves
continued
attacking
us
with
their
machetes
and
stole
our
phones,
clothing
and
sneakers,
leaving
us
naked,”
he
said.

Sibanda
suffered
deep
cuts
on
his
head,
hands
and
legs,
requiring
stitches.

“There
were
three
attackers,
two
with
machetes,
one
with
an
axe.
It
was
just
after
6pm,
as
the
sun
was
setting.
I’m
still
in
pain,
particularly
on
the
part
where
I
had
to
receive
stitches
and
the
part
where
they
knocked
me
with
the
axe.
I
am
struggling
to
walk.
They
really
injured
us,”
he
said.

Meanwhile,
the
councillor
hoped
police
would
act
as
residents
now
lived
in
fear,
with
many
questioning
their
safety
even
in
broad
daylight.

“These
criminals
are
bold,
attacking
people
coming
from
church,
work
or
as
they
go
about
their
routines.
What
next?”
Ndlovu
asked,
calling
for
increased
community
vigilance
and
patrols.

“I
urge
people
to
avoid
isolated
areas,
especially
near
the
railway
line.
Travel
in
groups,
particularly
after
sunset
and
report
suspicious
activity
immediately.”

ZANU-PF approves ten candidates for Insiza North primary elections


By
Promise
Dube

A
meeting
convened
on
Saturday
confirmed
that
all
ten
applicants
had
satisfied
the
party’s
requirements
and
would
advance
to
the
primaries,
scheduled
for
3
May
2025.

The
approved
candidates
are
Dr
Qhubani
Moyo,
Nkosana
Mthunzi,
Ernest
Ncube,
Lindelwe
Ndlovu,
Clever
Moyo,
Clever
Sibanda,
Nkosilomusa
Langa,
Delani
Moyo,
Davison
Moyo,
and
Sifiso
Mpofu.

Senior
party
officials
and
local
leaders
attended
the
meeting
at
the
District
Office,
which
concluded
with
a
call
for
peaceful
and
spirited
campaigns
ahead
of
the
vote.

The
by-election
follows
the
death
of
Hon
Taruvinga
earlier
this
month
after
a
battle
with
cancer.
He
had
represented
the
constituency
since
2018.

Campaigning
across
Insiza
North
is
expected
to
intensify
in
the
coming
weeks
as
the
candidates
vie
for
the
party’s
nomination.

UN presses for media capacity boost in Zim

The
United
Nations
(UN)
has
called
on
Zimbabwe
to
bolster
its
media
capacity
as
a
strategic
driver
for
national
development,
industrialisation 
and
the
achievement
of
the
2030
Agenda
for
Sustainable
Development,
urging
greater
collaboration,
professionalism
and
empowerment
of
journalists
to
foster
inclusive
progress.

Speaking
at
the
third
Zimbabwe
International
Trade
Fair
(ZITF)
Media
Indaba
in
Bulawayo
on
Thursday,
UN
Resident
and
Humanitarian
Coordinator,
Edward
Kallon,
stressed
that
media
development
is
not
just
about
freedom
of
expression
but
about
equipping
the
media
to
be
a
powerful
engine
of
nation-building.

“The
United
Nations
System
in
Zimbabwe
actively
supports
a
robust
media
landscape
that
ensures
accurate,
timely,
and
objective
reporting
on
development,
recovery
and
humanitarian
issues,”
said
Kallon.

“Media
freedom
in
Zimbabwe
has
allowed
for
new
communication
methods,
broadening
individuals’
participation,
identity
and
belonging
in
society.”

Under
the
discussion,
“The
Role
of
the
UN
in
Fostering
Media
Development
in
Zimbabwe,”
Kallon
highlighted
the
strategic
importance
of
the
media
in
promoting
democracy,
human
rights,
and
economic
transformation,
asserting
that
the
sector’s
transformation
must
be
intentional,
well-resourced
and
people-centered.

He
noted
that
Zimbabweans
today
enjoy
access
to
diverse
information
platforms,
from
print
and
broadcast
to
community
radios
and
digital
spaces,
which,
when
used
responsibly,
can
catalyse
positive
change.

“As
UN,
we
understand
and
appreciate
that
each
medium
carries
a
message,
targets
specific
audiences,
and
influences
change,
attitudes,
perceptions,
and
decision-making,
shaping
behaviors
accordingly,”
said
Kallon.

The
UN’s
approach
to
supporting
Zimbabwe’s
national
development
priorities
and
the
17
Sustainable
Development
Goals
(SDGs)
involves
direct
collaboration
with
media
stakeholders.
Kallon
also
commended
the
Ministry
of
Information
and
its
Permanent
Secretary,
Nick
Mangwana,
for
the
“excellent
collaboration”
with
the
UN
in
advancing
these
efforts.

“The
UN
supports
media
building
to
help
the
country
achieve
SDGs
by
strengthening
the
media’s
ability
to
report
on
and
promote
these
goals,”
he
said.

“This
includes
providing
training,
resources,
and
recognition
for
journalists,
particularly
those
working
on
gender
equality
and
maternal
health.”

Kallon
also
outlined
key
interventions
by
the
UN
to
enhance
media
effectiveness
in
Zimbabwe
noting
that
under
legislative
support,
the
UN,
through
entities
such
as
UNESCO,
has
backed
legislative
reforms
including
the
enactment
of
the
Freedom
of
Information
Act,
the
Broadcasting
Services
Act,
and
the
Data
Privacy
Act.

“These
laws
improve
the
space
for
media
freedom
and
public
discourse,”
he
said.

Secondly,
on
capacity
building
and
exposure,
Kallon
said
in
partnership
with
the
Ministry
of
Information,
the
UN
hosts
annual
development
reporting
seminars
and
offers
journalists
exposure
to
UN-supported
projects.

Thirdly,
on
training
and
resources,
Kallon
said
journalists
must
receive
support
in
the
form
of
training,
equipment,
and
awards
for
excellence
in
reporting
on
key
issues
such
as
climate
action
and
gender-based
violence.

Under
digital
empowerment,
as
a
fourth
factor,
the
UN
resident
coordinator
said
recognising
the
shift
towards
digital
journalism,
the
UN
encourages
young
reporters
to
leverage
online
platforms
to
drive
inclusive
storytelling
and
address
gender
disparities.

Fifth,
on
consultation
and
advocacy,
Kallon
said
the
UN
facilitates
national
and
local
consultations
that
engage
the
media
in
shaping
and
implementing
development
strategies,
particularly
around
the
SDGs.

Six,
under
a
focus
on
key
SDGs,
the
UN
resident
coordinator
said
special
attention
is
given
to
SDG
16
(Peace,
Justice
and
Strong
Institutions)
and
SDG
17
(Partnerships
for
the
Goals),
highlighting
the
media’s
critical
watchdog
role
in
holding
authorities
accountable.

According
to
Kallon,
an
empowered
and
professional
media
sector
is
essential
to
combating
misinformation,
building
public
trust,
and
enabling
citizens
to
make
informed
decisions
that
shape
the
country’s
trajectory.

“Media
and
journalists
have
been
crucial
in
sharing
facts
and
dispelling
myths
about
natural
disasters
and
disease
outbreaks,”
he
said.

“Accurate
and
timely
reporting
proved
vital
in
combating
the
pandemic
and
the
infodemic.”

On
climate
change,
Kallon
warned
against
growing
disinformation
and
urged
the
media
to
take
up
its
role
in
climate
advocacy,
noting
that
the
UN
continues
to
provide
climate
adaptation
resources
for
journalists.

Kallon
noted
that
strengthening
the
media
is
not
just
a
matter
of
policy,
it
is
a
moral
and
strategic
imperative.

“Media
should
amplify
the
voices
of
society’s
vulnerable,
including
children,
those
with
disabilities,
women
and
marginalised
groups,”
he
said.

“Their
stories
can
influence
behavior
changes
and
mobilise
support
for
action.”

The
UN
resident
coordinator
concluded
with
a
call
for
responsible
journalism
and
ethical
standards.

“To
fulfill
the
media’s
role,
professionalism
and
objectivity
are
crucial.
Media
bias
and
sensationalism
hinder
contributions
to
national
development.
Media
freedom
must
coincide
with
responsibility,”
Kallon
advised.

As
Zimbabwe
works
toward
becoming
an
upper
middle-income
country
by
2030,
Kallon
reaffirmed
the
UN’s
commitment
to
supporting
the
country’s
vision,
through
a
strong,
empowered
and
inclusive
media.

“I
reiterate
that
the
UN
values
its
partnership
with
the
media
in
advancing
the
2030
Agenda
for
Sustainable
Development
and
supporting
Zimbabwe’s
government
and
people
to
realise
these
goals
and
their
aspirations
for
a
strong
resilient
and
upper
middle
income
society
by
2030,”
he
said.

Ashamed of her disability, woman hangs daughter, aged 6

HWANGE

A
23-year-old
woman
from
Siabuwa
in
Matabeleland
North
allegedly
hanged
her
6-year-old
daughter
on
a
tree
branch
and
dumped
her
body
claiming
she
could
nolonger
keep
a
disabled
offspring.

Police
confirmed
the
arrest
of
Melody
Mwiinde,
23,
on
Friday
following
the
minor’s
cruel
extermination.

The
incident,
according
to
a
statement
on
the
police
handle,
happened
on
23
April
2025
at
Mujimba
9,
Siabuwa.

“The
suspect
allegedly
killed
her
daughter,
6,
by
hanging
her
with
an
electrical
cable
from
a
tree
branch,”
police
said.

“The
body
was
dumped
in
a
disused
hut.
The
suspect
allegedly
confessed
that
she
killed
the
victim
because
people
were
mocking
her
for
keeping
a
disabled
child
who
had
been
disowned
by
her
father.”