Ron DeSantis Claims Victory Over Disney And All He Had To Do Was Give Disney Everything They Wanted – Above the Law

(Photo
by
Chip
Somodevilla/Getty
Images)

It
began
with
Ron
DeSantis
swearing
vengeance
on
Disney
for
mildly
chastising
his
anti-gay
people
law.
After
detours
into

Lilibet
of
Sussex
and
the
Rule
Against
Perpetuities
,
remedial

civil
procedure
screw-ups
,
and

the
United
States
Supreme
Court
sending
a
stray
directly
at
DeSantis
,
the
matter
ends

much
like
the
DeSantis
presidential
campaign

not
with
a
bang
but
with
a
whimper.

Because
Disney
agreed
to
forfeit
its
headline-grabbing
and
hilarious
deal
with
the
Central
Florida
Tourism
Oversight
District
(then
known
as
the
Reedy
Creek
Improvement
District),
granting
Disney
functional
control
over
the
district
until
21
years
after
the
death
of
the
last
surviving
descendent
of
King
Charles,
DeSantis
supporters
are
framing
the
agreement
as
a
victory.

For
example,
one
tipster
wrote
in:

Hey
Jo
,
here’s
a
tip.
Did
you
see
that
Ron
DeSantis
just
cleaned
Disney’s
clock?
Makes
you
look
like
a
gas
bag

Given
his
inability
to
spell
a
three-letter
word,
it
won’t
surprise
you
to
learn
that
he
did
not
actually
read
and
understand

the
settlement
agreement

(helpfully

scanned
by
Politico
).
Thankfully,
we’re
always
here
to
help
him
out.

But
first,
some
background.
There
was
a
time,
not
too
long
ago,
where
Ron
DeSantis
believed
he
could
be
president.
It
may
be
hard
to
remember
that
after
he
spent
the
next
several
months
getting
ritualistically
humiliated
by
Donald
Trump,
but
it
was
true!
And
to
bolster
his
profile,
he
embarked
on
a
series
of
policies
to
fight
“wokeness”
including
the
Don’t
Say
Gay
bill,
an
education
provision
banning
schools
from
acknowledging
that
gay
people
exist.
It
has
since
been

largely
overturned

because,
like
all
of
DeSantis’s
attempts
to
govern

from
firing
prosecutors

to

forcing
cruise
lines
to
give
everyone
COVID
,
his
policies
seem
destined
to
get
trounced
in
court.

Disney
offered
the
slightest
of
critiques
of
the
Don’t
Say
Gay
bill
and
DeSantis
decided
to
seek
revenge,
targeting
the
Reedy
Creek
Improvement
District.
To
oversimplify
the
purpose
of
the
entity,
Disney
owns
lots
and
lots
of
land
in
central
Florida
and
that
land
needs
government
services
like
water,
and
sewers,
and
firefighters.
Rather
than
force
some
neighboring
town
to
fork
over
property
taxes
to
pay
for
Disney’s
private
empire,
the
company
had
its
own
quasi-governmental
district.
They
paid
for
all
the
services
and
in
return
those
expenditures
were
more
or
less
treated
like
government
expenditures
saving
the
company
tax
dollars.
Everyone
won.

But
it
was
something
that
Disney
had
that
DeSantis
could
mess
up.
He
first
made
a
public
bid
to
eliminate
the
tax
district.
After

learning
that
this
would
saddle
Florida
taxpayers
with
millions
in
debt


something
he
probably
should’ve
researched
before
staking
his
reputation
on
it

he
came
up
with
the
idea
of
saving
the
district
but
replacing
all
its
board
members
with
cronies
who
would
take
away
or
otherwise
frustrate
key
permits
that
Disney
relied
upon
like
its
water
management
rights.
More
on
that
later.

Since
DeSantis
and
the
new
board
cared
less
about
governing
than
symbolic
posturing,
they
never
bothered
to
pay
attention
as
the
outgoing
board
publicly
noticed
meetings
to
hand
power
over
to
Disney
directly.

As
a
Florida
corporate
law
expert

AND
REPUBLICAN

noted
at
the
time
,
Disney’s
actions
were
airtight
legal
under
existing
law.
The
Republican
legislature
tried
to
change
that
and
that’s
when
everything
descended
into
lawsuits.

Now,
with
Disney
giving
up
on
its
deals
with
the
outgoing
board,
has
DeSantis
really
won?
Consider
the
settlement.

The
first
prong
of
this
settlement
actually
fell
into
place
before
yesterday,
when
DeSantis
appointed
Stephanie
Kopelousos
to
run
the
district,
replacing
Glen
Gilzean,
who
DeSantis
originally
put
in
the
job

before
an
ethics
panel
ruled
that
he
was
serving
illegally
.
Kopelousos
is
a
Disney-applauded
hire,
having
spent
her
career
in
the
DeSantis
orbit
shielding
Disney
from
the
governor’s
half-baked
schemes,
including

carving
them
out
of
the
big
“tech
wokeness”
bill

that

the
Supreme
Court
is
about
to
strike
down
anyway
.

So
now,
instead
of
being
bossed
around
by
board
members
like

the
guy
who
said
fluoride
makes
kids
gay
,
Disney
has
to
deal
with
a
known
government
ally
who
is
almost
certainly
just
warming
her
resume
to
become
a
Disney
or
Universal
lobbyist
down
the
road.

Not
an
auspicious
beginning
for
the
DeSantis
victory
crowd.

Second,
the
deal
doesn’t
just
invalidate
Disney’s
deals
with
the
outgoing
board,
but
also
everything
the
new
board
has
tried
to
do.
Under
the
terms
of
the
agreement,
everything
reverts
to
the
state
of
play
in
2020
under
the
old
Disney
board
and
charges
Kopelousos
to
run
things
from
there.
Theoretically,
the
new
entity
could
still
try
to
mess
with
Disney,
however…

7.
Mitigation
Credits.
As
a
material
inducement
to
Disney
in
entering
into
the
Agreement,
the
District
acknowledges
Disney
is
the
owner
of,
and
the
District
shall
not
prohibit
or
impede,
but
rather
assist
in
the
use
of,
Long-Term
Permit
Mitigation
Credits
or
other
entitlements
created
through:

a)
South
Florida
Water
Management
District
Environmental
Resource
Permits
Nos.
48-00714-S,
48-00714-P,
and/or
and
48-00714-8-22,
as
amended;
b)
Department
of
the
Army
Permit
199101901
(IP-GS)
and/or
SA3-1991-01901
(SP-TSD),
as
amended;
c)
State
of
Florida
Game
and
Fresh
Water
Fish
Commission
Permits
Nos.
OSC-4,
OSC-SSC-1,
and/or
OSC-TSR-1,
as
amended.

As
a
term
of
the
settlement,
the
new
entity
expressly
forfeits
its
right
to
do
the
sort
of
critical
mayhem
they
hoped
to
accomplish
and
indeed
to
“rather
assist”
Disney
in
securing
the
substantive
benefits
Disney
wanted
all
along.

Strike
two.

Finally,
the
agreement
takes
the
unusual
step
of
NOT
ending
all
the
pending
litigation
and
releasing
everyone
from
liability.

8.
Federal
Lawsuit.
Disney
agrees
to
seek,
and
the
District
will
not
oppose,
permission
from
the
court
to
defer
briefing
in
Disney’s
pending
federal
appeal
captioned
as
Walt
Disney
Parks
and
Resorts
U.S.,
Inc.
v.
Governor,
State
of
Florida
et
at,
Case
No.
24-10342
(11th
Cir.)
(“Federal
Lawsuit”),
pending
negotiations
among
other
matters
of
a
new
development
agreement
between
Disney
and
the
District.

The
Eleventh
Circuit
appeal
is
the
strongest
of
the
various
lawsuits.
Trump
judge
Judge
Allen
Winsor,
claimed
that
a
law
only
and
specifically
impacting
Disney-run
Reedy
Creek
could
not
be
considered
targeted
at
Disney
because
the
word
“Disney”
isn’t
in
the
actual
legislation.
There
might
be
an
appellate
panel
willing
to
buy
Winsor
rewriting
civil
procedure
to
benefit
DeSantis,
but
it’s
not
likely.

The
substance
of
the
case
alleges
that
the
new
board
breached
Disney’s
First
Amendment
rights
by
retaliating
against
it
over
the
Don’t
Say
Gay
law.
So
they
maintain
the
lawsuit
predicated
on
the
appearance
of
retaliation
“pending
negotiations
among
other
matters
of
a
new
development
agreement
between
Disney
and
the
District.”

In
other
words,
Disney
gets
a
new,
friendly
negotiating
partner,
all
the
board’s
rules
tossed,
a
commitment
that
the
entity
can’t
mess
with
the
interests
Disney
cared
about,
and
the
parties
agree
that
the
company
can
maintain
its
most
powerful
lawsuit
as
a
cocked
gun
to
the
temple
of
the
new
entity
to
be
invoked
if
the
negotiations
don’t
go
Disney’s
way.

As
clock
cleanings
go,
it’s
more
like
DeSantis
performing
community
service
scrubbing
down
the
Main
Street
USA
clocks
and
then
telling
Bob
Iger,
“Thank
you,
sir,
may
I
have
another?”
Though
he
does
get
to
walk
away
mildly
saving
face
that
he’s
changed
the
name
on
top
of
the
tax
district
letterhead.

And
after
getting
mollywhopped
by
Nikki
Haley
of
all
people,
he’s
going
to
take
any
W
he
can
get.


(Settlement
Agreement
on
the
next
page.)


Earlier
Ron
DeSantis
So
Sure
He’s
Going
To
Win
Disney
Lawsuit
That
He’s
Publicly
Begging
Bob
Iger
To
Drop
It


Supreme
Court
Subtweets
Ron
DeSantis
That
He’s
Totally
Losing
To
Disney


Disney
Litigators
Take
Their
Turn
Beating
The
Hell
Out
Of
Ron
DeSantis
With
New
Federal
Lawsuit


We
Shouldn’t
Have
To
Choose
Between
Disney
Whipping
DeSantis
And
A
Dickensian
Hellscape


Judge
In
Disney’s
Case
Against
Ron
DeSantis
Recuses
Himself
Because
Father’s
Brother’s
Nephew’s
Cousin’s
Former
Roommate
Owns
30
Shares
Of
Disney


Disney’s
Lawyers
Are
Better
Than
Ron
DeSantis’s
Lawyers


Disney
Lawyers
Seem
Honestly
Shocked
That
Ron
DeSantis
Legal
Team
Is
So
Bad
At
This


DeSantis
Crony
Overseeing
Disney
Tax
District
Serving
Illegally
Because
OF
COURSE!


HeadshotJoe
Patrice
 is
a
senior
editor
at
Above
the
Law
and
co-host
of

Thinking
Like
A
Lawyer
.
Feel
free
to email
any
tips,
questions,
or
comments.
Follow
him
on Twitter if
you’re
interested
in
law,
politics,
and
a
healthy
dose
of
college
sports
news.
Joe
also
serves
as
a

Managing
Director
at
RPN
Executive
Search
.

Bonuses Take Flight At Southeastern Top 50 Biglaw Firm – Above the Law

Slowly
(perhaps
too
slowly,
for
some
associates)
but
surely,
Biglaw
firms
across
the
Am
Law
200
continue
to
match
Milbank’s
generous

year-end
 and special
bonus
scales
this
holiday
season.
The
latest
firm
to
match
the
prevailing
market
rate
isn’t
going
to
let
Christmas
and
Hanukkah
fly
away
without
a
word
about
bonuses.

Bonuses
are
taking
wing
today
at
Alston
&
Bird,
which
brought
in
$1,150,108,000
gross
revenue
in
2023,
putting
it
at
No.
46
on
the
Am
Law
100.
Here’s
what
the
bonus
grid
looks
like
at
the
firm:

IMG_9103

We
understand
that
the
firm
has
a
2000-hour
threshold
for
base
bonuses,
and
as
noted
in
the
firm’s
memo,
the
partnership
has
concluded
that
associates
who
qualify
for
a
class
year
bonus
will
also
be
awarded
a
special
bonus.

Congratulations
to
everyone
at
Alston
&
Bird!


(Flip
to
the
next
page
to
see
the
full
memo.)

Remember
everyone,
we
depend
on
your
tips
to
stay
on
top
of
compensation
updates,
so
when
your
firm
announces
or
matches,
please
text
us
(646-820-8477)
or email
us
 (subject
line:
“[Firm
Name]
Bonus/Matches”).
Please
include
the
memo
if
available.
You
can
take
a
photo
of
the
memo
and
send
it
via
text
or
email
if
you
don’t
want
to
forward
the
original
PDF
or
Word
file.

And
if
you’d
like
to
sign
up
for
ATL’s
Bonus
Alerts
(which
is
the
alert
list
we
also
use
for
salary
announcements),
please
scroll
down
and
enter
your
email
address
in
the
box
below
this
post.
If
you
previously
signed
up
for
the
bonus
alerts,
you
don’t
need
to
do
anything.
You’ll
receive
an
email
notification
within
minutes
of
each
bonus
announcement
that
we
publish.
Thanks
for
your
help!



Staci ZaretskyStaci
Zaretsky
 is
a
senior
editor
at
Above
the
Law,
where
she’s
worked
since
2011.
She’d
love
to
hear
from
you,
so
please
feel
free
to

email

her
with
any
tips,
questions,
comments,
or
critiques.
You
can
follow
her
on BlueskyX/Twitter,
and Threads, or
connect
with
her
on LinkedIn.


Bonus Time

Enter
your
email
address
to
sign
up
for
ATL’s

Bonus
&
Salary
Increase
Alerts
.


It’s the holidays in Zimbabwe. Time to celebrate by unveiling a family tombstone

HARARE,
Zimbabwe
(AP)

Chipo
Benhure
started
saving
early
for
a
holiday
season
to
remember
in
Zimbabwe,
but
it
wasn’t
for
a
party
or
vacation.
The
highlight
is
a
graveyard
ceremony
to
unveil
her
late
mother’s
tombstone.

The
generations-old
rite
has
come
to
be
associated
with
long
holidays
such
as
Christmas
in
the
southern
African
nation,
where
the weakened
economy
 leaves
many
people
struggling
to
do
their
duty
of
honoring
the
dead.

“I
didn’t
want
to
be
found
wanting
come
Christmastime,
so
I
was
putting
aside
a
few
dollars
each
month,”
Benhure
said,
standing
at
a
crowded
and
dusty
ground
on
the
outskirts
of
the
capital,
Harare.
Workers
used
grinders
and
stone
polishers
to
make
tombstones.
Others
chiseled
detailed
portraits,
referring
to
photos
shared
by
loved
ones.

Soon,
a
$450
black
granite
tombstone
was
added
to
the
flower
bouquets
and
sacks
of
groceries
as
Benhure
and
about
a
dozen
relatives
squashed
together
in
a
minibus
traveling
to
their
rural
home
for
the
ceremony.
The
cost
represented
more
than
twice
the
average
monthly
income
for
an
urban
household
in
Zimbabwe,
which
is
about
$200.

Zimbabweans
traditionally
use
long
holidays
such
as
the
Christmas
season
to
hold
often
joyous
graveyard
rites
that
include
song,
dance,
Christian
prayers
or
invitations
for
ancestral
spirits
to
protect
and
guide
the
living.

In
Zimbabwe’s
urban
areas
this
holiday
season,
household
yards
and
other
open
spaces
have
been
turned
into
makeshift
tombstone
manufacturing
zones
by
people
trying
to
eke
out
a
living.

Prices
range
from
$150
to
$2,500,
and
some
people
pay
in
installments.
Delivery
vans
and
trucks
are
on
standby
for
hire.

One
tombstone
provider,
Tafadzwa
Machokoto,
attended
to
a
stream
of
customers
and
called
this
his
busiest
time
of
year.
The
computer
science
graduate
now
employs
almost
10
people
for
making
or
marketing
tombstones.

“Our
customers
take
tombstone
unveiling
very
seriously.
They
would
rather
spend
on
the
ceremony
than
on
a
Christmas
bash.
They
need
the
blessings,”
he
said.

Machokoto
recalled
a
businessman
who
once
ordered
11
tombstones
because
his
transport
venture
was
struggling.
The
businessman
said
he
constantly
had
dreams
of
his
late
father
instructing
him
to
spruce
up
the
family
cemetery.

“It
rained
just
after
the
ceremony
and
everyone
took
it
as
a
sign
that
the
ancestors
were
now
happy,”
Machokoto
said.
“He
even
bought
me
a
smartphone
months
later
as
a
present,
saying
his
business
was
now
thriving.”

On
a
recent
weekend
at
a
cemetery
on
the
outskirts
of
Harare,
Zororo
Memorial
Park,
several
graves
were
covered
with
white
cloth,
ready
for
unveiling
ceremonies.

The
family
of
the
late
Kindness
Ziwange
said
it
had
spent
over
$2,000
on
the
ceremony,
including
$900
for
a
tombstone.
Afterward,
close
to
50
relatives,
friends
and
neighbors
feasted
on
fried
potatoes,
fried
rice,
grilled
chicken,
stewed
beef
and
vegetable
salad.

“We
will
lay
low
on
Christmas
Day.
We
already
had
our
big
day
today
as
a
family.
Some
traveled
through
the
night
for
this
event,”
said
a
relative,
Isabel
Murindagomo.

While
some
in
Zimbabwe
regard
the
ceremony
as
an
essentially
Indigenous
ritual
associated
with
the
ancestral
cult
and
reactivation
of
the
spirits,
others
view
it
as
a
Christian
event
to
remember
deceased
relatives,
said
Ezra
Chitando,
a
professor
in
the
University
of
Zimbabwe’s
religious
studies
department.

“The
majority
of
people
are
hovering
between
the
two
positions.
Some
try
to
moderate
by
contributing
financially
to
the
process
but
do
not
attend
the
ceremony,”
Chitando
said,
highlighting
the
religious
complexity
of
local
beliefs
associated
with
the
dead.

Although
the
majority
of
Zimbabweans
profess
to
be
Christian,
experts
say
many
combine
the
faith
with
traditional
practices.

Benhure,
with
the
tombstone
for
her
late
mother
now
in
place,
sees
little
difference
in
the
end.

“Honoring
the
dead
brings
blessings
to
the
living
irrespective
of
one’s
religion,”
she
said.

Gannett Removes Trump Trollsuit Against Iowa Poll To Federal Court – Above the Law

(Photo
by
Evan
Vucci-Pool/Getty
Images)

On
December
16,
Donald
Trump
filed
his

latest
harassing
trollsuit

against
a
media
company
that
said
mean
words
that
hurt
his
feelings.
This
time
the
target
was
Iowa
pollster
J.
Anne
Selzer,
who
projected
that
Vice
President
Harris
would
take
the
state
by
three
points,
a
16-point
whiff.
Trump

sued
her
,
along
with
the
Des
Moines
Register
and
its
parent
company
Gannett
Co.,
under
the
state’s
consumer
protection
statute,
his
favorite

“one
weird
trick”

to
get
around
the
First
Amendment.

But
it
turns
out
Trump
was
so
busy
enjoying
all
that
delicious
earned
media
that
he
forgot
to
serve
all
the
defendants
at
once.

Whoopsie
doodle!

And
so
Gannett
used

one
weird
trick

of
its
own
to
get
out
of
the
District
Court
for
Polk
County,
Iowa.
And
this
trick
is
actually
based
on
real
law,
not
just
rebranding
your
SLAPP
suit
as
a
consumer
fraud
action
and
hoping
you
can
force
the
victims
to
spend
a
shitload
of
cash
before
a
judge
tosses
you
out
of
court.

Gannett’s
“trick”
is
the
forum
defendant
rule,
28
U.S.C.
§
1441(b)(2),
which
allows
for
federal
removal
on
the
basis
of
diversity
“if
any
of
the
parties
in
interest
properly
joined
and
served
as
defendants
is
a
citizen
of
the
State
in
which
such
action
is
brought.”
Here,
Trump’s
MAGA
lawyer
filed
the
complaint
on
the
16th,
and
served
Gannett
the
next
day.
But
he
apparently
failed
to
“properly
join
and
serve”

any

of
the
Iowa
parties
(Selzer,
her
company
S&C,
and
the
Register)
at
that
time.
And
that
meant
that
the
Florida
Man
and
Gannett
(a
Delaware
company
doing
business
in
New
York)
were
the
only
players
officially
on
the
field.

As
trademark
lawyer
Mark
Jaffe

observed

on
Bluesky,
this
may
explain
Gannett’s
refusal
to
publicly
commit
to
funding
Selzer’s
legal
defense.

“To
remove
this
to
federal
court,
Gannett
relies
on
a
doctrine
which
requires
that
Selzer
hasn’t
been
served
yet,”
Jaffe
noted.
“Lawyers
usually
accept
service
on
behalf
of
their
client.
If
they
accepted
on
behalf
of
Selzer,
they
couldn’t
invoke
this
rule.”

And
so,
the
Polk
County
clerk
duly
closed
the
case
one
day
after
opening
it.
Trump’s
trollsuit
has
now
been
assigned
to
Judge
Rebecca
Ebinger
of
the
Southern
District
of
Iowa.
Before
Barack
Obama
elevated
Judge
Ebinger
to
the
federal
bench,
she
served
as
a
state
judge
in
Iowa,
so
she’ll
be
well
placed
to
determine
whether
a
newspaper
article
is
“merchandise”
for
the
purpose
of
Iowa’s
consumer
fraud
statute.


Trump
v.
Selzer

[Docket
via
Court
Listener]





Liz
Dye
 lives
in
Baltimore
where
she
produces
the
Law
and
Chaos substack and podcast.

HoLove Damage Control Is Salt In The Wound – See Also – Above the Law

*
You’re
not
imagining
it…
a
lot
of
firms
still
haven’t
announced
bonuses.
[National
Law
Journal
]

*
Another
federal
judge
in
Texas
recuses
from
Elon’s
it’s
illegal
for
advertisers
not
to
give
me
money

lawsuit.
[Reuters]

*
ABA
Prez
argues
that
electronic
messages
from
lawyers
to
inmates
should
be
covered
by
attorney-client
privilege.
[ABA
Journal
]

*
ACLU
says
prisons
are
holding
people
past
their
release
date.
[NY
Times
]

*
Why
hire
one
lateral
partner
when
you
can
hire
the
whole
group?
[American
Lawyer
]

*
Biden
will
exceed
Trump’s
record
for
judicial
appointments
by
one
after
trading
some
key
circuit
nominations
for
a
path
to
confirm
more
district
judges.
[Law360]

*
But
his
collection
of
confirmations
were
more
diverse
than
ever
before.
[Bloomberg
Law
News
]

This Attorney Reportedly Willing To Restrict Access To Abortion Pill – Above the Law



Ed.
Note:

Welcome
to
our
daily
feature

Trivia
Question
of
the
Day!


According
to
comments
by
Sen.
Josh
Hawley
(R-Mo.),
which
Trump
cabinet
pick
committed
to
to
reinstating
anti-choice
rules
designed
to
limit
access
to
mifepristone?


Hint:
Behind
closed
doors,
the
pick

an
attorney

reportedly
said,
“there
are
far
too
many
abortions
in
the
U.S.
and
that
we
cannot
be
the
moral
leader
of
the
free
world
with
abortion
rates
so
high.”



See
the
answer
on
the
next
page.

Lawmakers introduce bipartisan SHIPS Act to boost commercial shipping – Breaking Defense

A
container
ship
passes
under
the
International
Gateway
Bridge
at
the
Port
of
Long
Beach
in
Long
Beach,
California,
US,
on
Monday,
June
17,
2024.
(Tim
Rue/Bloomberg
via
Getty
Images)

WASHINGTON

A
bipartisan,
bicameral
group
of
lawmakers
today
introduced
legislation
aimed
at
strengthening
the
American

shipbuilding
and
commercial
maritime
industries

following
what
they
characterized
as
“decades
of
neglect.”

The
bill
in
question,
dubbed
the

Shipbuilding
and
Harbor
Infrastructure
for
Prosperity
and
Security
for
America
Act
,
is
being
sponsored
by
Sens.
Mark
Kelly,
D-Ariz.,
and
Todd
Young,
R-Ind.,
as
well
as
Reps.
John
Garamendi,
D-Calif.,
and
Trent
Kelly,
R-Miss.
Rep.
Mike
Waltz,
R-Fla.,
who
has
been
tapped
by
the
new
Trump
administration
to
be
national
security
advisor,
has
also
previously
expressed
support
for
the
bill.

“This
historic
bipartisan
proposal
would
restore
American
leadership
across
the
oceans
by
establishing
national
oversight
and
consistent
funding
for
U.S.
maritime
policy,
incentivizing
domestic
shipbuilding,
enabling
U.S.-flagged
vessels
to
better
compete
in
international
commerce,
rebuilding
the
U.S.
shipyard
industrial
base,
and
expanding
the
mariner
and
shipyard
workforce,”
according
to
a
written
statement
from
the
lawmakers.

The
bill
would
establish
a
maritime
security
advisor
within
the
White
House
tasked
with
coordinating
inter-agency
decisions
for
how
to
implement
a
national
maritime
strategy.
It
would
also
create
a
“Strategic
Commercial
Fleet
Program”
focused
on
expanding
a
US-flagged
international
fleet
to
250
ships
within
10
years.
The
four
lawmakers
said
that
fleet
currently
sits
around
80
ships
compared
to
China’s
5,500.
The
bill
would
also
require
that
government-funded
cargo
be
moved
aboard
US-flagged
vessels
as
well
as
requiring
a
portion
of
imported
goods
from
China
to
do
the
same,
among
other
things.

“We’ve
always
been
a
maritime
nation,
but
the
truth
is
we’ve
lost
ground
to
China,
who
now
dominates
international
shipping
and
can
build
merchant
and
military
ships
much
more
quickly
than
we
can,”
said
Sen.
Kelly.
“The
SHIPS
for
America
Act
is
the
answer
to
this
challenge.”

Outgoing
Navy
Secretary
Carlos
Del
Toro
has
made
commercial
shipping
and
shipbuilding
a
focus
area
of
his
this
year.

“I’m
very
pleased
the
bipartisan
SHIPS
for
America
Act
is
making
progress
in
Congress
since
it
was
announced
in
September
and
look
forward
to
the
day
when
it
is
signed
into
law. 
From
my
perspective,
the
SHIPS
for
America
Act
and
the
Navy’s
Maritime
Statecraft
complement
each
other
perfectly. 
Both
speak
to
the
growing
momentum
of
a
national
conversation
around
American
Maritime
Power,”
Del
Toro
said
in
a
statement
published
subsequent
to
the
bill’s
filing.

“These
initiatives
are
about
working
together
in
the
Department
of
the
Navy,
interagency,
Congress,
industry,
and
academia
to
find
innovative
ways
to
re-vitalize,
strengthen
and
expand
our
maritime
power.
 
The
SHIPS
for
America
Act
is
a
vital
step
forward
in
our
Maritime
Statecraft,
and
I
think
this
critical,
bipartisan
piece
of
legislation
will
reshape
our
nation’s
maritime
future,”
the
statement
continued.

During
an
event
last
week
hosted
by
the
American
Society
of
Naval
Engineers,
he
urged
the
new
administration
to
continue
his
efforts,
theorizing
that
the
neglect
the
commercial
shipbuilding
sector
has
faced
in
recent
decades
presents
an
opportunity
for
the
White
House
to
boost
the
economy
with
new
jobs.

“If
we
want
to
expand
our
economy,
you’ve
got
to
expand
the
supply
chain.
You’ve
got
to
expand
the
number
of
companies
that
are
participating
in
the
growth
of
the
economy
itself,”
he
said.
“And
there
aren’t
a
lot
of
places
where
you
could
effectively
do
that
here
in
the
United
States,
[but]
because
we
have
abandoned
the
commercial
shipbuilding
industry
since
about
the
1980s,
that
creates
a
new
opportunity
for
growth
in
a
significant
way.”

Given
the
limited
time
the
current
Congress
has
left
in
session,
the
bill
will
almost
certainly
need
to
be
refiled
next
year
before
it
can
be
considered
by
the
relevant
committees
or
the
larger
chambers.
Legislation
related
to
national
security
often
doesn’t
receive
standalone
votes,
but
rather
is
included
in
the
annual
defense
policy
bill.



Updated
12
/20/2024
at
9:04
am
ET
w
ith
comments
from
Navy
Secretary
Carlos
Del
Toro.

Partners Know What They’re Worth, So Biglaw Better Have Their Money – Above the Law



Ed.
note
:
Welcome
to
our
daily
feature,

Quote
of
the
Day
.


You
have
to
have
the
financial
strength
to
pay
people
what
they’re
worth
in
the
market.





Frank
Lopez
,
chair
of
Paul
Hastings,
in
comments
given
to

Bloomberg
Law
,
on
his
firm’s
aggressive
recruiting
of
rainmaker
partners
for
top
dollar,
which
was
one
of
the
top
trends
of
2024
across
the
Biglaw
landscape.
At
some
firms,
highly
sought-after
partners
were
able
to
collect
$20
million
or
more
to
make
a
key
lateral
move.



Staci ZaretskyStaci
Zaretsky
 is
a
senior
editor
at
Above
the
Law,
where
she’s
worked
since
2011.
She’d
love
to
hear
from
you,
so
please
feel
free
to

email

her
with
any
tips,
questions,
comments,
or
critiques.
You
can
follow
her
on BlueskyX/Twitter,
and Threads, or
connect
with
her
on LinkedIn.

Should Lawyers Always Accept Service Of Process As A Courtesy? – Above the Law

I
am
generally
a
very
courteous
lawyer,
and
I
like
to
extend
courtesies
whenever
I
can.
The
practice
of
law
is
difficult
enough
at
baseline,
and
lawyers
can
make
it
easier
to
practice
if
they
extend
small
favors
to
each
other
and
treat
adversaries
and
other
stakeholders
in
a
legal
matter
with
some
kindness.
However,
sometimes
lawyers
ask
me
to
waive
substantive
rights
that
my
clients
might
have,
under
the
guise
of
granting
adversaries
a
courtesy.
I
generally
do
not
believe
a
lawyer
has
a
duty
to
extend
a
courtesy
that
waives
a
client’s
substantive
right,
and
this
usually
extends
to
not
automatically
accepting
service
of
process
or
waiving
defenses
parties
might
have
involving
service
of
process.

In
some
instances,
rather
than
make
an
adversary
go
through
the
process
of
serving
my
clients,
I
will
accept
it.
For
instance,
if
an
adversary
gives
me
an
extension
of
time
to
answer,
I
generally
repay
the
favor
by
waiving
service
of
the
summons
and
other
initiating
papers.
In
addition,
some
clients
want
their
lawyers
to
waive
service
of
process
since
they
do
not
want
to
be
chased
down
by
process
servers.
However,
if
a
client
does
not
care
about
being
served,
and
lawyers
are
not
getting
anything
in
return,
it
seems
fine
to
refuse
waiving
service
of
process.

Several
times
in
my
career,
I
have
defended
clients
who
were
not
properly
served
with
process.
Sometimes,
my
clients
encourage
me
to
fight
service
of
process
since
they
want
to
advance
any
defense
they
have
to
a
given
legal
claim.
Usually,
I
will
not
file
a
motion
to
dismiss
solely
on
the
basis
of
ineffective
service
of
process,
but
if
I
am
filing
a
motion
to
dismiss
anyways,
I
might
throw
in
the
lack
of
service
of
process
as
an
additional
defense.
In
some
instances,
service
of
process
is
waived
if
it
is
not
contested
early
in
litigation,
so
it
typically
pays
to
preserve
the
argument,
especially
if
a
motion
to
dismiss
is
filed
for
other
reasons.

Multiple
times
in
my
career,
adversaries
have
reached
out
and
asked
that
I
waive
service
of
process,
even
though
they
concede
service
of
process
was
wrongly
performed
and
I
filed
a
motion
to
dismiss
on
this
basis.
Adversaries
have
suggested
that
it
is
a
common
courtesy
to
waive
service
of
process,
and
that
I
was
not
being
kind
with
contesting
service
of
process.
I
usually
respond
by
saying
that
it
was
not
typical
to
unilaterally
waive
service
of
process
without
getting
any
benefit
in
return,
and
that
if
the
adversary
did
not
want
to
make
service
of
process
an
issue
in
this
case,
the
lawyer
could
have
followed
the
service
of
process
rules
correctly.

I
am
not
the
type
of
lawyer
who
really
cares
if
another
lawyer
waives
service
of
process.
If
the
other
lawyer
wants
to
waive
service,
I
prepare
an
acknowledgement
of
service
document,
and
if
they
do
not,
I
reach
out
to
a
vendor
in
order
to
properly
effectuate
service
of
process.
Guilting
someone
to
accept
service
of
process
is
not
a
tactic
that
I
employ,
but
this
has
happened
to
me
on
multiple
occasions.
I
generally
want
to
be
seen
as
a
courteous
lawyer,
but
at
the
same
time,
I
have
a
duty
to
diligently
represent
my
client,
and
waiving
service
of
process
can
forgo
a
critical
defense.

I’d
love
to
hear
responses
from
practitioners
about
whether
waiving
service
of
process
is
a
courtesy
that
should
be
done
unilaterally
and
when
no
benefit
is
conferred
on
the
lawyer
waiving
service.
My
feeling
is
that
lawyers
should
not
be
asked
to
waive
a
substantive
right,
and
this
is
different
from
when
a
lawyer
asks
for
an
adjournment
due
to
unforeseen
circumstances
or
other
similar
situations.
Although
lawyers
can
sometimes
waive
service
of
process
for
practical
reasons,
if
a
client
wants
to
fight
service
of
process,
lawyers
should
not
be
pressured
to
waive
this
argument
in
order
to
promote
courtesy.




Rothman Larger HeadshotJordan
Rothman
is
a
partner
of




The
Rothman
Law
Firm
,
a
full-service
New
York
and
New
Jersey
law
firm.
He
is
also
the
founder
of




Student
Debt
Diaries
,
a
website
discussing
how
he
paid
off
his
student
loans.
You
can
reach
Jordan
through
email
at





[email protected]
.

This Top 50 Biglaw Firm Is Offering Associates Bonuses On Top Of Bonuses On Top Of Bonuses – Above the Law

Biglaw
firms
have
been
announcing
bonus
matches
left
and
right
since
earlier
this
month,
so
associates
at
top
firms
that
have
been
silent
on
year-end
compensation
thus
far
are
getting
pretty
antsy.
Where’s
the
money,
you
mofos?
Well,
at
one
firm
that
literally
goes
by
MoFo,
the
money
has
finally
arrived.

We’ve
now
confirmed
that
Morrison
&
Foerster

a
firm
that
brought
in
$1,343,000,000
gross
revenue
in
2023,
putting
it
at
No.
38
in
the
most
recent
Am
Law
100

has
chosen
to
match
Milbank’s
generous

year-end
 and special
bonus
scales
this
holiday
season.
On
top
of
their
base
bonuses,
associates
at
the
top
firm
are
also
eligible
to
receive
not
one,
but

two

additional
bonuses
on
top
of
their
special
bonus
payments.
Here’s
what
the
bonus
grid
looks
like
at
the
firm:

IMG_9047

Now
THIS
is
a
law
firm
that’s
willing
to
go
above
and
beyond
to
offer
compensation
incentives
to
reward
its
hardworking
attorneys.

As
noted
in
the
firm’s
bonus
memo,
“[t]his
structure
allows
us
to
reward
our
highest
performing
associates
for
their
extraordinary
work
this
year.”
MoFo’s
most
senior
associates
will
have
the
opportunity
to
walk
away
with
bonuses
up
to
$218,200,
which
is
simply
amazing.

Congratulations
to
everyone
at
Morrison
&
Foerster!


(Flip
to
the
next
page
to
see
the
full
memo
from
the
firm.)

Remember
everyone,
we
depend
on
your
tips
to
stay
on
top
of
compensation
updates,
so
when
your
firm
announces
or
matches,
please
text
us
(646-820-8477)
or email
us
 (subject
line:
“[Firm
Name]
Bonus/Matches”).
Please
include
the
memo
if
available.
You
can
take
a
photo
of
the
memo
and
send
it
via
text
or
email
if
you
don’t
want
to
forward
the
original
PDF
or
Word
file.

And
if
you’d
like
to
sign
up
for
ATL’s
Bonus
Alerts
(which
is
the
alert
list
we
also
use
for
salary
announcements),
please
scroll
down
and
enter
your
email
address
in
the
box
below
this
post.
If
you
previously
signed
up
for
the
bonus
alerts,
you
don’t
need
to
do
anything.
You’ll
receive
an
email
notification
within
minutes
of
each
bonus
announcement
that
we
publish.
Thanks
for
your
help!



Staci ZaretskyStaci
Zaretsky
 is
a
senior
editor
at
Above
the
Law,
where
she’s
worked
since
2011.
She’d
love
to
hear
from
you,
so
please
feel
free
to

email

her
with
any
tips,
questions,
comments,
or
critiques.
You
can
follow
her
on BlueskyX/Twitter,
and Threads, or
connect
with
her
on LinkedIn.


Bonus Time

Enter
your
email
address
to
sign
up
for
ATL’s

Bonus
&
Salary
Increase
Alerts
.