Proactive Legislation And The Inclusion Of Seniors In Our Society Are Steps To Protecting Them Against Predators

A disturbing aspect of an  elder law and trusts and estates practice is the discovery of elder abuse. According to the National Institute on Aging, hundreds of thousands of adults over the age of 60 are abused, neglected, or financially exploited each year. Elder abuse includes physical, emotional, and sexual abuse in addition to neglect and abandonment.  The perpetrators are often relatives or friends who have influence over the individual who may be vulnerable due to illness, disability, or age. Sometimes the abuse occurs at the hands of caregivers, whether in the home or in a facility.

New York Senator Kirsten Gillibrand has introduced bipartisan legislation to help protect the elderly and infirmed by improving health care worker hiring practices in long-term care and medical facilities. Too often the elderly and infirmed are harmed as a result of the individuals working in the very facilities that are charged with helping rehabilitate them.

The Promote Responsible Oversight and Targeted Employee Background Check Transparency for Seniors Act, also known as “PROTECTS,” is an act that would expand access to the National Practitioner Data Bank for Medicare and Medicaid providers to conduct background checks on employees. Specifically, PROTECTS would include Medicaid/Medicare-certified skilled nursing facilities, home health agencies, hospice programs, and pharmacies.

The Act has been endorsed by the American Health Care Association and the National Association for Home Care & Hospice. The aforesaid Data Bank would reveal malpractice for potential employees and assist facility administrators in their hiring and consequently affect the standards of care.

As an attorney who regularly practices with the elderly population, I visit a lot of nursing homes. As a guardianship practitioner, I interact regularly with many professionals servicing the elderly such as nursing home administrators and geriatric care managers. Personally, I have spent many days and nights at hospitals and rehabilitation and nursing facilities for my own parents. As is the case with one’s health care, it is imperative that you learn to advocate for your needs. The problem is that those in facilities are often too sick or too intimidated to speak up for themselves. For those lucky enough to have involved friends and family, the risk of being abused or mistreated is lessened by the mere fact that they have someone present to speak for them. Additionally, would-be predators are likely aware of the patients who receive visitors and who have involved family members.

Elder abuse, however, does not just occur in facilities. It also occurs in the home. Relatives and close friends often gain access to bank books and financial accounts and take advantage of a vulnerable person’s assets. Financial scams abound wherein the elderly are lured into investing in businesses that do not exist or do not provide that which they promise. Unfair annuities and reverse mortgages are pitched at lunch events targeted toward senior citizens, eager to connect with someone or something. Savings are often divested and the reporting of these actions is low.

Sometimes the abuse is at the hands of home health aides who insist on or help themselves to gifts as a result of their “care” of the patient. In many cases, the abuse extends beyond the patient’s life, when last wills and testaments are revealed naming health care aides or others as beneficiaries, much to the surprise of family members.

New York’s PROTECTS Act is a good step towards increasing protections for the elderly and long-term care patients. Other states have made similar endeavors. From a macro perspective, it is imperative that we keep the elderly a part of our greater communities. They fall prey to abuse when they are isolated. There are many seniors who do not interact with anyone outside of their residence. Similarly, there are many who do not receive any visitors when residing in a facility. Keeping seniors a part of our society, along with proactive legislation to protect against predators who abuse in a myriad of ways, is just a start to reducing the rate of elder abuse in our country.


Cori A. Robinson is a solo practitioner having founded Cori A. Robinson PLLC, a New York and New Jersey law firm, in 2017. For more than a decade Cori has focused her law practice on trusts and estates and elder law including estate and Medicaid planning, probate and administration, estate litigation, and guardianships. She can be reached at cori@robinsonestatelaw.com

Berkeley Law School Group Invites Amy Wax To Headline Event In Effort To Lower The Bar Even Further

Berkeley Law (photo by David Lat).

She did it, you guys.

UPenn Law’s Amy Wax has successfully demonstrated yet again that trading in academic credentials for easily debunked innuendo can pay off if you’re willing to put your faith in the lowest common denominator and the feckless cowardice of university officials.

As a truly spooky Halloween event, Berkeley Law’s Public Law and Policy Program (co-sponsored by the Federalist Society and the Pacific Research Institute) will have UPenn professor Amy Wax give a spiel at an event that’s NOW titled “A Conversation with Amy Wax and Mickey Kaus,” marking a rare opportunity for superficial hot-take artist Kaus to be the reasonable one in the room.

But that’s not what the event was always called. No, this ostensibly academic endeavor was at one point billed as “Nationalism, Identity, and Immigration: Considerations for the Academy and the Nation.” Wax now gets to slap the name of another prestigious academic institution onto her bio — an honor befitting a woman who recently graduated from just making stuff up to misconstruing Wikipedia pages.

More distastefully — if possible — this event is being run as a fundraiser with a $60/head admission charge. This means people are actually expected to spend good money to listen to Wax discuss immigration policy when they could easily just ask Cooter to spit out a missive through his meth-depleted teeth.

With Wax and Kaus on the same stage, I can save everyone some time and preview the festivities:

Wax: America is better off without people who aren’t from Northern European stock. That’s not a racist statement, I’m just saying those people are dirty and dumb.
Kaus: As a proud liberal… I totally agree with all of that and it’s a shame that the Dumbocrats don’t understand that. Which is something I can say because I’m totally a liberal.
*Repeat ad nauseam*

This isn’t much of a surprise from a group that’s previously hosted Heather Mac Donald, author of The Diversity Delusion, a book that unabashedly argues that the academy is better off when it’s populated by exclusively by white men. Berkeley’s just sitting by as its name serves as an aegis for gussied-up, whitewashed white supremacy. It’s long past time to reserve the term “white supremacy” for violent overt racists. Any ideology positing that white people or culture are supreme — and remember Amy Wax doesn’t “shrink from the word, ‘superior’” — is quite literally white supremacy and deserves to not fly under the radar just because it’s gussied itself up for the cameras. Wax is getting cited by Stormfront. At a certain point, what your work justifies matters.

And no doubt the response of the school’s defenders will again be that the academy thrives on different and controversial viewpoints and that they respect the views of these affiliated groups even if they don’t agree. Which is a fine answer in theory, but also one that Wax and her cronies have thoroughly hacked for their own gain. The academy is about allowing controversial professors to post their empirical research and expose themselves to the slings and arrows of their colleagues’ research to build upon human knowledge. It’s not about letting people pop off about MS-13 conspiracy theories. Drawing that line is uncomfortable for academics. They want to say, “Who are we to say when something isn’t academic freedom?”

It’s a cop-out that everyone knows is coming and it’s a cop-out that Amy Wax has built her career upon.

EarlierLaw School Professor Amy Wax Cites Wikipedia And We Need To Stop Pretending Tenure Was Made For This
Amy Wax’s Racist Remarks Force Penn Law School To Let Her Take A Paid Vacation
T14 Law Professor Goes To White Nationalism Conference And Says White Nationalist Things And Somehow Still Has A Job
Academia Means Never Having To Say, ‘I Got Fired’
T14 Law Professor Goes To White Nationalism Conference And Says White Nationalist Things And Somehow Still Has A Job
Professor Amy Wax And The Bell Curve
Law Professors Say White ’50s Culture Is Superior, Other Racist Stuff
Penn Law School Prof Amy Wax Stumbles Into A Truth… Before Delving Back Into Vile Conspiracy Theories
Amy Wax Relieved Of Her 1L Teaching Duties After Bald-Faced Lying About Black Students
Professor Declares Black Students ‘Rarely’ Graduate In The Top Half Of Law School Class
Dog Whistling ‘Bourgeois Values’ Op-Ed Gets Thorough Takedown From Other Law Professors
Law Students Seek To Ban Professor From Teaching 1Ls
Law School Professor Says Dr. Ford ‘Should Have Held Her Tongue’ In Latest Embarrassment To Her School


HeadshotJoe Patrice is a senior editor at Above the Law and co-host of Thinking Like A Lawyer. Feel free to email any tips, questions, or comments. Follow him on Twitter if you’re interested in law, politics, and a healthy dose of college sports news. Joe also serves as a Managing Director at RPN Executive Search.

Pops And Popsy Search For Truffles In The Forest: An Insider-Trading Story

Told in four (and counting?) indictments.

Law School Students Upset Clarence Thomas Will Be Teaching At School

(Photo by Aude Guerrucci-Pool/Getty Images)

Once upon a time, a law school’s decision to bring a Supreme Court justice to campus to teach a class was a no-brainer. It would bring prestige to the school, it would be a unique educational opportunity for their students, and everyone would be pleased with the outcome. But now that increasingly controversial people are being appointed to lifetime appointments to the Court, it fundamentally changes the calculus for law schools.

The University of Florida Levin College of Law announced that in spring 2020, Justice Clarence Thomas is teaching a compressed course on the religious clauses of the First Amendment. That decision has been met with complaints by students at the law school. A new advocacy group, We Believe Survivors, wrote a letter in the student newspaper, The Independent Florida Alligator, asking Dean Laura Rosenbury and school administrators to “explain how the celebration of Clarence Thomas’ presence on campus will help the effort to address the culture at UF that has led to an increase in campus sexual assault.”

The letter calls attention to the allegations of sexual harassment Anita Hill made against Thomas as well as a recent UF survey on sexual assault and misconduct which found UF undergraduate female reports of nonconsensual sexual conduct increased from 23 to 26 percent since 2015. Given the concerning uptick in sexual misconduct at the school, We Believe Survivors believes treating Thomas as a honored guest at the law school will send a problematic message to survivors:

“If we come forward, will we be treated like Hill?” the letter said. “Will we be ignored while our abusers are paraded as esteemed guests at our law school? Does Levin really believe survivors? Or do we only believe survivors when their abusers aren’t powerful?”

As reported by Law.com, second-year law student Dalia Figueredo believe the issue was exacerbated because students weren’t told before Thomas was invited:

But it’s about accountability, the way Figueredo sees it, as she’d hoped her university would have first told students about the idea of inviting Thomas.

“Our administration is here to serve us, and I think it’s very important to question what kind of message law school is sending to potential survivors of assault or harassment when they invite someone who has been credibly accused to campus,” Figueredo said.

Dean Rosenbury’s statement on the controversy says she supports student advocacy at the law school:

“We are a diverse law school, and our students, faculty and staff care deeply about a range of issues,” Rosenbury said. “We encourage all of our students to become effective advocates, whether through student groups or other means.”

But Thomas will still be teaching at the law school next year.


headshotKathryn Rubino is a Senior Editor at Above the Law, and host of The Jabot podcast. AtL tipsters are the best, so please connect with her. Feel free to email her with any tips, questions, or comments and follow her on Twitter (@Kathryn1).

NY City Bar To Attorney General: Delete Your Account

Attorney General William Barr (Photo by Jahi Chikwendiu/The Washington Post via Getty Images)

Safe bet the New York City Bar won’t be inviting Attorney General Bill Barr to the next Young Lawyers Happy Hour event. In fact, he’s pretty much persona non grata for the foreseeable future since the organization just published an open letter telling the Attorney General to GET THE F*** OUT OF TOWN. Well, they phrased it somewhat more diplomatically, calling for him recuse himself from any “Ukraine-related issues.” And if not, “he should resign or, failing that, be subject to sanctions, including possible removal, by Congress.”

Alrighty then!

Citing the president’s infamous July 25 call with President Volodymyr Zelensky when Trump promised twice to have Attorney General Barr coordinate the Ukrainian investigation of Joe Biden, the NYC Bar says, “Mr. Barr was obligated to recuse himself from any involvement in DOJ’s review of either the whistleblower complaint or the substance of the President’s actions once the President offered Mr. Barr’s services to President Zelensky.”

Barr’s name also came up in the Whistleblower Complaint, and yet the AG failed to recuse from the criminal referral to the Office of Legal Counsel, which buried it after a cursory investigation and refused to turn it over to Congress in accordance with the law. In fact, Barr was aware of the substance of the allegations weeks earlier, since the whistleblower tried to make an informal complaint through the general counsel at his agency, but Barr and his deputy John Demers decided that a criminal referral didn’t count unless it was in writing.

More recently, the Attorney General has been gallivanting all over Europe trying to gin up evidence for Trump’s crackpot theory that the entire intelligence community is lying about Russians hacking the DNC, and somehow the DNC server was spirited away to Ukraine. (Yes, this theory relies on murdered DNC staffer Seth Rich being the “real” leaker, and yes, they actually believe this horsesh*t.) And just last week, White House Chief of Staff Mick Mulvaney took to the podium to confess on national television that congressionally allocated funds for Ukraine were being held up to ensure that country’s compliance with that DOJ probe — a clear quid pro quo.

So, yeah, Barr’s up to his jowls in it. And by failing to live up to his basic professional obligations — including 28 CFR 45.25 CFR 2635.502, and the U.S. Attorney’s Manual 3-2.170 — the Attorney General sets a lousy example, both for young lawyers sitting for the MPRE and for the thousands of lawyers under him at the Justice Department.

Because respect for law is central to our nation’s governance, the Attorney General of the United States bears a special responsibility to see that our laws are justly administered for the benefit of the American people.  The Attorney General is, and must be seen as, the representative of the nation in advising the President and other federal officers and must demonstrate an unquestioned commitment to compliance with law by all who exercise the powers of government.

Even Jeff Sessions, who was too stupid and racist to win judicial confirmation from his own party — look it up! — understood his ethical obligation to recuse from an investigation in which he was likely to be a fact witness. And when you’re being compared unfavorably to a guy who said in open hearing, “I am not insensitive to blacks,” it’s probably time to turn off Fox News and do some serious thinking.

But serious thinking isn’t really Bill Barr’s thing. He’s far too busy at the moment planning his Christmas party at the Trump Hotel in D.C.

Your move, D.C. Bar!

Attorney General Barr Should Recuse Himself from Department of Justice Review of Ukraine Matter [NYC Bar]
New York City Bar Calls for US AG William Barr’s Recusal in Ukraine Matter [Law.com]

Morning Docket: 10.24.19

Rudy Giuliani (Photo by Drew Angerer/Getty Images)

* Rudy Giuliani is reportedly looking for another defense lawyer.  Guess he listened to the old adage about he who represents himself… [CNN]

* Rose McGowan is suing the lawyers Harvey Weinstein enlisted to discredit her, including David Boies.  I’m sure the defendants know a few good attorneys to represent them. [New York Times]

* The D.C. Bar just released an ethics opinion on what managers and employees should do if they think a lawyer is impaired. Based on some of the stories on this website, such guidance is sorely needed. [American Lawyer]

* A Clarence Thomas documentary is set to be released in 2020.  Guess Justice Thomas wanted his own RBG. [Time]

* A lawyer who is suing her former employer must pay the legal fees of her former law firm because she failed to produce critical evidence for 17 months. [New Jersey Law Journal]

* A man caught on video punching his own lawyer in court was acquitted of the assault, since the injuries were deemed not serious.  Apparently being injured with a concussion and a broken nose from an assault by a client is just a job hazard for lawyers. [WTVR.com]


Jordan Rothman is a partner of The Rothman Law Firm, a full-service New York and New Jersey law firm. He is also the founder of Student Debt Diaries, a website discussing how he paid off his student loans. You can reach Jordan through email at jordan@rothmanlawyer.com.

Tharisa Zimbabwe Asset Receives Special Economic Status – The Zimbabwean

A 50,667-hectare area has been given the designation, miner Tharisa said, and is on bits of land covered by special mining grants to Karo Zimbabwe Holdings Ltd, of which Tharisa owns 27%.

The designation gives Karo some special incentives, such as reduced tax rates, duty-free importation of raw materials, and different exchange control rulings.

Tharisa Chief Executive Phoevos Pouroulis said: “Zimseza’s award of the special economic zone status to Karo’s license in Zimbabwe is a critical step in the development of what could become a world-class vertically integrated PGM operation. The Karo mine could transform the Zimbabwean PGM sector, bringing significant economic benefits to all stakeholders and building a long-term sustainable mining industry.

“The SEZ status, as well as the completion of the initial resource classification, are key milestones prior to investing in the various phases that a project of this scale requires for it to succeed. We look forward to working closely with Zimseza and the government of Zimbabwe, together with the local, regional and national stakeholders, as well as our financial partners, to bringing this project to fruition.”

Tharisa’s London shares were 0.9% lower at 109.50 pence each, and Johannesburg shares were 0.3% lower at ZAR19.59.

Former Implats head David Brown to lead Zimbabwe-Russia platinum joint venture

Post published in: Business

Former Implats head David Brown to lead Zimbabwe-Russia platinum joint venture – The Zimbabwean

24.10.2019 7:52

Great Dyke Investments is seeking US$500m from Afreximbank to fund the projectGreat Dyke Investments

David Brown. Picture: ROBERT TSHABALALA

Russia-Zimbabwe joint venture Great Dyke Investments (GDI) says it is in talks with the African Export-Import Bank (Afreximbank) as well as Russian and South African investors to raise US$500m for its platinum project in Zimbabwe.

Zimbabwe is the world’s third-largest producer of platinum after SA and Russia.

The company says it is wrapping up financing for the project and expects to begin mine construction in 2020.

In 2017, a feasibility study by SA’s DRA Group showed “robust economics for phase one of the project, which was later complemented with a basic economic assessment confirming the economic potential of the full-scale three-phased project”.

Newly appointed GDI executive chair David Brown said, “There remains a lot of hard work to be done before we can commence development on the ground, but I am confident that the Darwendale project has the potential to become a significant low-cost platinum group metal producer, ultimately becoming a major part of the global PGM industry in the mid-term.”

Great Dyke Investments announced the appointment of Brown, a former CEO of Implats, on Wednesday.

Brown also served as Implats CFO from 1999 to 2006. He resigned from Implats in 2012 to pursue personal interests.

“Brown has a rich experience in platinum as he was instrumental in the development of Implats’ Zimbabwe’s asset, Zimplats, which is the country’s largest platinum miner,” GDI said.

In a statement Great Dyke vice-chair Igor Higer said the company plans to secure funding by March 2020.

“Peak funding for the Darwendale phase project is estimated at more than US$500m. The main financial partner of the project is the Afreximbank, which has been acting as the mandated lead arranger since early 2018.

“According to the agreement, Afreximbank’s mandate covers both debt for the project financing and equity raising portion in the amount sufficient for the successful implementation of phase one of the project.”

Higer said at a production rate of 3,5-million tons a year, GDI will produce an average of 280,000oz of PGM and gold at phase one, while the second phase will increase capacity to 10.5-million tons a year and PGM production of 860,000oz a year.

Zimbabwe is banking on ramping up platinum production as PGMs  are earmarked to rake in US$3bn by 2023, in line with the country’s target of US$12bn annually from minerals.

Two other new platinum mines, Karo Mining Holdings, which is part-owned by SA’s Tharisa, and Bravura, owned by Nigerian billionaire Benedict Peters, have concessions to mine platinum in the country.

Tharisa Zimbabwe Asset Receives Special Economic Status
Zimbabwe: Severe Food Insecurity

Post published in: Business

Zimbabwe: Severe Food Insecurity – The Zimbabwean

24.10.2019 7:41

English Infographic on Zimbabwe about Agriculture, Food and Nutrition, Drought, Flash Flood and more; published on 22 Oct 2019 by US DOS HIU

Across Zimbabwe food insecurity is growing, with an estimated 3.6 million rural Zimbabweans in need of humanitarian assistance (IPC Phase 3 or higher), an increase from the 2.3 million estimated between June and September 2019. Widespread drought — which led to a poor 2019 harvest — combined with Zimbabwe’s precarious economic conditions are contributing to low food availability, rising food prices, and very high inflation rates that are reducing purchasing power. Cyclone Idai exacerbated the situation by further disrupting cropping activities in eastern Zimbabwe. The volatile economy and the impending lean season (peak lean season January to March 2020) threaten to increase the number of food insecure Zimbabweans.

US Department of State – Humanitarian Information Unit:

https://hiu.state.gov/Pages/Home.aspx

Former Implats head David Brown to lead Zimbabwe-Russia platinum joint venture
Zimbabwe celebrating Anti-Sanctions Day

Post published in: Agriculture

Zimbabwe celebrating Anti-Sanctions Day – The Zimbabwean

In an unusual political move, the Zimbabwean government this week has declared Oct. 25 to be a national holiday to protest longtime U.S. sanctions against the Southern African country.

News of Zimbabwe’s anti-U.S. sanction holiday was reported by The Washington Post on Oct. 22. The Zimbabwean government said its Anti-Sanctions Day will specifically highlight the economic harm allegedly caused to the country by U.S. sanctions.

To celebrate the new national holiday, The Washington Post said Zimbabweans from around the country are expected to be transported to Harare, the country’s capital, to “march, watch a soccer match between the country’s two biggest teams and attend an all-night concert.”

President George W. Bush issued the first executive order to impose sanctions against Zimbabwe on March 6, 2003, as domestic violence in the country threatened to destabilize the region. The sanctions took aim at Zimbabwean President Robert Mugabe and his political associates.

The U.S. Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) established the Zimbabwe Sanctions Regulations on July 29, 2004, which placed the sanctioned Zimbabweans on the Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons (SDN) List. Placement on this list generally blocks the U.S. assets of these individuals and prevents U.S. persons from conducting business with them.

President Bush signed two additional executive orders to expand sanctions against the Mugabe regime on Nov. 22, 2005, and July 25, 2008, for “undermining Zimbabwe’s democratic processes and institutions.”

Zimbabwe’s current president, Emmerson Mnangagwa, who replaced Mugabe after he was forced from office in 2017, is also on OFAC’s SDN List.

The Zimbabwean government has argued that the country’s current economic hardships are largely due to the U.S. sanctions, which the U.S. has denied, stating that the sanctions “do not block the government of Zimbabwe as a whole, nor do they prohibit all business with the country of Zimbabwe or transactions involving that jurisdiction.”

On April 24, 2013, OFAC issued a general license to allow transactions involving Zimbabwe’s Agricultural Development Bank and Infrastructure Development Bank.

The African Development Bank Group said Zimbabwe still struggles with “protracted fiscal imbalances,” which keep most of the country’s population in poverty. However, the bank said the country can improve its economy through minimal additional investment and political reform.

“Given the vast natural resources, relatively good stock of public infrastructure and comparatively skilled labor force, Zimbabwe has an opportunity to join existing supply chains in Africa through the Continental Free Trade Area,” the bank said.