Mugabeism: Reflections on the Man – The Zimbabwean

His insatiable appetite for power escalated hatred of any form of opposition and despite the protests by the Movement for Democratic Change, civil society and various pressure groups against his rule.  He managed to stay in power for 37 years before being ousted by his long-time lieutenant, Emmerson Mnangagwa, in November 2017, through a military coup.

In his 2015 book, Mugabeism: History, Politics and Power in Zimbabwe, Sabelo J. Ndlovu-Gatsheni describes the former President as an enigmatic figure whose political life attracted both admirers and critics and being the first of its kind, the book describes the self-contradiction of character and political life of the former president. Robert Mugabe was an outspoken economic nationalist, intellectual, racist and a radical Pan-Africanist, all as a veil to cover a somewhat fascistic militarism. As one of the first generation post-colonial African nationalist leader who led Africa to independence, Robert Mugabe had fought with the will to use education as a justification to inclusion in the colonial government until such inclusion did not seem enough to end the racial, social, economic and political divide between the two.

This fight for independence from colonial rule grew upon him to a point where he was obsessed with ending the Western interference in the Zimbabwean affairs,  particularly that of Britain. This made Mugabe an Afro-Radical who was geared to fight any form of opposition through nativism; thus, driving him to the point where he became an antithesis of democracy and human rights. In  his analysis of Mugabe, Martin Meredith pointed out that soon after independence Mugabe was glorified by the West  as he promised reconciliation and peace and therefore got admired as a model for transition from colonial leadership. However as his rule progressed, Robert Mugabe sacrificed his April 1980 ideals and the potential of Zimbabwe by turning into autocrat whose rule was characterised by  corruption,  gross violation of human rights,  violence and patronage.

The most fascinating thing about Robert Mugabe was his ability to master how to keep a long grip on power. Clueless as he seemed, Robert Mugabe knew exactly what he was doing and  what the people wanted but he did not just  give it to them without promised or guaranteed support.  Patronage and corruption became the order of Mugabe’s rule to the extent that people were fed up and wanted him to leave and have someone take over. The Movement for Democratic Change was the people’s preference as they believed it could save the country from the economic and political despair.  However, it also turned out that it cherishes Mugabeism as seen by Morgan Tsvangirai’s long hold on power  and the unconstitutional take over by Nelson Chamisa.

But, I guess that is politics!  It is never about the people’s needs but their votes. In Robert Mugabe’s world, anyone who did not share the same beliefs with him was opposition and violence was always a necessary evil to achieve political gain. The use of violence in Zimbabwean politics, thus,  did not end with Mugabe,  even former Movement for Democratic Change leader, Morgan Tsvangirai and his successor,  Nelson Chamisa have at some point alluded to how violence is the only way  if you are to be heard in politics when pushing a political agenda.

Robert Mugabe was smart enough to ensure that even after he was gone his reign would continue in every one of us. We would pay a bribe for a service, would always put our ‘self’ above others, would lose confidence in the country’s economic system, so much that we could never fathom the idea of nation building. Mugabeism circles around ensuring citizens hero worship a leader, a problematique that seems to have cut across political divide. Zimbabwe’s political parties resemble fiefdoms of their leaders and their political culture is informed by what Professor Ali Mazrui termed “Le es tat me syndrome (The state is me syndrome) now to read Le es party me (The party is me syndrome). Robert Mugabe will live up to his expectations, life ruler of Zimbabwe, his ghost will live on in Zimbabwe.

Tildah Magoba  is a Journalist and writer on Zimbabwe’s Public Affairs

Robert Gabriel Mugabe: a man whose list of failures is legion
Family denies feud with government over Mugabe burial

Post published in: Featured

Family denies feud with government over Mugabe burial – The Zimbabwean

ZIMBABWE – The family of former president Robert Mugabe says there’s no feud between the government and the family over where he will be buried.

Family spokesperson, Leo Mugabe, says they have been meetings with the government and everything is going according to plan.

“To say there is a feud is not correct, it’s not true. We’ve been meeting with government and everything has been very smooth. There’s understanding, there’s clarity on responsibilities and therefore there’s no feud whatsoever,” said Leo Mugabe.

He says the family and the chiefs in Zvimba will decide where the former president will be laid to rest.

“The chiefs in Zvimba still regard him as a chief and in terms of tradition they are the ones that determine where is he going to be buried, how is he going to be buried, the procedures that must be followed in his burial. This is a cultural thing and nobody can push the chiefs to divulge where they are going to bury [Mugabe],” he said.

Mugabe died in a Singapore hospital on Friday, aged 95.

His funeral is expected to take place on Sunday, 15 September.

Robert Mugabe’s True Legacy – The Zimbabwean

There have been a number of books written on Robert Mugabe in his many leadership roles.  As a leader of a guerrilla movement/army, as a prime minister, as a president and even from a western perspective as a complicated/sophisticated dapper dictator.  And make no mistake, many more will be written about him.  As an ousted or disgraced long ruling repressive leader and also as a belatedly glorified Pan Africanist.

And it is the assumptions of future published perspectives on Mugabe’s long rule that are of interest. What I am however concerned with is the lived realities of Mugabe’s legacy.  And by legacy here I am not inferring something to be celebrated but more something to be understood.

In the aftermath of the coup that toppled him, Mugabe has largely been holed up in his Borrowdale mansion and giving the impression of a bitter self-righteousness.  He emerged publicly at least twice.  The first time to endorse the mainstream opposition presidential candidate in a long drawn statement and questions and answer session with the press. The second time to vote for the latter in Highfields, Harare.

I am sure he has had other interviews and publicized conversations with visiting leaders from African countries.  Or his wife as his spokesperson has occasionally put out the same.  Together with his still many apologists and runners either in remnants of the G40 faction he spawned or on social media and in the mainstream opposition.

Beyond the immediacy of his ouster from power, we are however reeling from the effects of his leadership of the state.  And there is little that is positive that can be objectively discerned from it or assumed to be as a result of his own individual leadership effort.

Having ridden on the noble but painful cause and struggle that was the liberation struggle, Mugabe managed in his at least 37 years in power, to undermine the values and principles that the liberation struggle was motivated by.

While conveniently embracing socialism as his then ruling party’s ideological foundation, he was to actively undermine it in practice.  Foregoing the democratic values of socialism, he went on to attempt a violent clampdown on his then main opposition rivals in the form of Joshua Nkomo’s Pf Zapu under the pretext of preventing a civil war in the southern parts of the country.  An attempt that has come to be infamously called ‘Gukurahundi’.

After co-opting the same opposition, Mugabe was to try to establish a ‘one party state’ which was eventually rejected via the activism of his former colleagues in the struggle but also due to the fact that it was no longer popular in Southern Africa after Nyerere had abandoned the same in Tanzania.

What was to prove colossal in his intentions at retaining power with global western power endorsement, was his economic about turn to embrace neoliberalism/ capitalism as advised by the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and World Bank.

Where he had previously had some sort of obligation to collective and people centered economics he abandoned this to begin his worship at the altar of free market economics.  Contrary to the values of the liberation struggle.  And this was the beginning of the unraveling of our national consciousness as had been established by the liberation struggle.  It quite literally became about Mugabe and his hold on power while serving the interests of global capital.

It was labour that was to try and rein in Mugabe’s neoliberalism by first of all recalling the values of the liberation struggle and using the same to challenge an elitist political economy.   The Zimbabwe Congress of Trade Unions (ZCTU) and its allies in the students and womens’ movements as well as human rights focused civil society organisations went on to establish what was then referred to as a working people’s party, the Movement for Democratic Change (MDC).

Mugabe in populist turn decided to by embark on what we officially know to be the Fast Track Land Reform Programme (FTLRP. All in a vainglorious and individualist attempt at retaining the loyalty of war veterans and the peasantry.  While at the same time echoing long abandoned principles and values that had motivated the liberation struggle.

It worked, albeit briefly.  Mugabe’s neoliberal economy could not sustain the FTLRP and it expectedly reeled under not only sanctions but also the fact that its populism was never going to make it revolutionary.

That it happened and has been said by Mnangagwa’s government to be irreversible does not make it any less violent or populist in serving Mugabe’s intention at retaining power.

Even by the time he was forced by SADC to form an inclusive government with the opposition, Mugabe’s particular version of individualism in politics would not allow him to even consider his own succession.  In his own party nor for posterity.

And where we fast forward to his ouster from power, his particular streak of individual political stubbornness eventually led him to be hoist by his own petard. He quite literally fell on his own sword. Even if he didn’t see it coming.

It is a combination of Mugabe’s inability to see into the future or beyond himself and his deliberate abandonment of liberation struggle socialist democratic values as accompanied by neoliberal/free market economics that led Zimbabwe to its current parlous state.

The end effect of this on our own society has been catastrophic.  Not only just in relation to our one time critical national consciousness as informed by the liberation struggle but also to our own individual perceptions of what should be a progressive society.

Mugabe’s long rule has the unenviable legacy of having created a highly individualized, materialistic and populist society.  One that perceives progress by the day and rarely considers collective posterity.  And with a default admiration of neoliberalism and ideological austerity.  Mugabe, via his ruling party Zanu Pf have taken us into the trap of ‘millennial capitalism’ where a combination of free market economics, superstition (religion), gambling and individualism have stymied the collective national consciousness.

There are many ways to regain a critical collective national consciousness.  The first step to doing so is to identify what caused its demise.  Historically and in the contemporary, that begins at identifying Mugabe’s real legacy and role in getting us to where we are as a country. Where we are saddled with a nasty/violent, materialist and populist individualism.

This article was first published in April 2019 on http://takura-zhangazha.blogspot.com/  

Family denies feud with government over Mugabe burial
Mugabe…“The good men do is oft interred with their bones”

Post published in: Featured

Mugabe – A Legacy of Impunity, Death and Poverty – The Zimbabwean

On one hand, he is viewed as a liberation icon and also a Pan-Africanist with a heart for black empowerment and emancipation. On the other hand, he is also viewed as a ruthless dictator who killed and plundered just to maintain his grip on power. For me, Mugabe is not complex at all, he was a ruthless dictator. Any good he did was not out of the goodness of his heart but a calculated means to an end – an end that had to always terminate with his victory by any means necessary.

 

Whilst not much is documented about  his shenanigans before his release from prison in 1974,  the most defining moment is his ascendancy to the helm of the Zimbabwe African National Union (ZANU) was at the special congress in Chimoio in 1977

 Previously, cracks had emerged after the collapse of the Zimbabwe People’s Army (ZIPA) which was a military-driven coalition of the fighting forces between the Zimbabwe People’s Revolutionary Army (ZIPRA) and the Zimbabwe National Liberation Army (ZANLA). Robert Mugabe and other political leaders like Edgar Tekere were not comfortable with the rise of the younger generation of radicals and ideologically-conscious but also military-trained leadership that was now driving the war since the death of Herbert Chitepo in 1975. The group that included commanders like Dzinashe Machingura, Stephen Chocha, Parker Chipoyera known as Vashandi had already attended the Geneva Conference in 1976 as a semi-autonomous group representing the fighting wings.

In  1977 ZANU held its Special Congress whose main aim was to deal with the outstanding issues of leadership and legitimacy that had lingered since 1963 and it was then that Mugabe grabbed power through the aid of Josiah Magama Tongogara and Solomon Mujuru, known by his nom-de-guerre, Rex Nhongo. From there it became Mugabe’s mission to destroy Vashandi and he enlisted the help of Emmerson Mnangagwa, then, a fresh law graduate who prosecuted at the kangaroo military tribunal and called for a death sentence on them. They were, however, later kept in dugout dungeons until independence in 1980.

Robert Mugabe never had any intentions to share power with Joshua Nkomo the leader of Zimbabwe African People’s Union (ZAPU). Initially it had been agreed that they were going to contest elections as the Patriotic Front in 1980, but Mugabe reneged at the last minute and once he took power, Mugabe made it his sole priority to make sure that ZAPU would never be a threat to him, hence, his attempt to introduce a One-Party State policy, which however faced stiff resistance. So it should be noted that Mugabe was never a democrat, he was forced to concede to some of the democratic processes by the people.

The clash of the guerrilla groups of ZIPRA and ZANLA at Entumbane in 1980 and the subsequent issue of an arms cache in 1982 justified Robert Mugabe’s long-planned destruction of ZAPU and ZIPRA. Thus, in the guise of fighting dissents, whom he claimed were sponsored by ZAPU to orchestrate acts of violence across the country, Mugabe, unleashed the North Korean trained Fifth Brigade into Matabeleland killing people wantonly. According to the Catholic Commission for Justice and Peace in Zimbabwe report “Breaking the Silence” approximate  20 000 people were killed, and to date none of these people ever got justice. The Chihambakwe Commission of Inquiry established in 1983 to investigate the genocide that happened the Midlands and Matabeleland produced a report whose findings were never made public but is widely believed to have heavily implicated Mugabe and his people. Most senior ZAPU leaders who included Lookout Masuku and Dumiso Dabengwa were incarnated for allegedly planning a coup de tat, and eventually, ZAPU was subjugated and frog-marched into talks that culminated in the signing of the Unity Accord in  1987 in which ZAPU was completely dissolved and for Mugabe the One Party State dream was becoming a reality.

On the economic front, Zimbabwe seemed to be doing fine and with expansion in education and health for Zimbabweans previously excluded in Rhodesia, yet some structural challenges were brewing. These days are generally credited as Zimbabwe’s heydays and also Mugabe’s best. Mugabe and his government undertook to ensure that schools and rural health centres are built, and indeed the policies yielded results as the country’s development indicators positively improved. However, beyond the policy thrust of the Mugabe administration, what remains untold is that most of the funding was done through grants and loans from multilateral institutions. Local communities also played a significant role as they contributed with labour and locally sourced building materials such as bricks, sand, stones and water among many other community interventions. Access to education and healthcare improved and was good but let us not forget that it was also a responsibility of government. Mugabe was just doing the job he was engaged to do.

In 1988 Mugabe fell out with his longtime friend and then ZANU General Secretary Edgar Tekere who went on to form Zimbabwe Unity Movement (ZUM) which contested elections in 1990 and 1995.  Mugabe did not take this lightly resulting in the arrest, torture and abductions of many ZUM members. In 1990 Patrick Kombayi was shot and paralysed by central intelligence agents Elias Kanengoni and Kizito Chivamba while he was campaigning against the Vice President Simon Muzenda. Despite the two having been convicted and sentenced to jail time, Mugabe pardoned them before they even served and shockingly,  Elias Kanengoni was promoted to Director of the dreaded Central Intelligence Organisation (CIO).

In 1997 Mugabe facing increased pressure from liberation war veterans unilaterally and without consulting with Treasury decided at a whim to give each one of them a lump sum of ZW$50 000. This was done to appease them but without regard to the long-term effects on the economy. Typical of his lone ranger style, Mugabe unilaterally decided to enter the Congo and defend Kabila in 1998 despite the misgivings of the Southern African Development Community (SADC). While this was seen as a Pan-African thing to do he did not give due consideration to the economic impact this would have on Zimbabwe. At its height, the war was costing Zimbabwe US$2 million a day and according to former Finance Minister, Simba Makoni, at least US$200 million was poured in the operation and this was not sustainable as it was also at the time when the country was  reeling from other issues like the HIV/AIDS pandemic. Due to these bad decisions and many others, the  Zimbabwean economy spiralled into an endless crisis that is gripping the country up to now.

The Movement for Democratic Change was formed in 1999 following the 1998 food riots and subsequent demands for a new constitution which was expected to curtail some of Mugabe’s powers. The economy was also putting pressure on Mugabe and his people were growing impatient over the issue of land.

War veterans marched on him demanding land, at the same time MDC was gaining ground. To survive Mugabe threw white farmers under the bus and launched the chaotic and ruthless exercise to grab land from minority white people and distribute it to black people. While land reform was a necessity Mugabe only did it to save himself.

His biggest undoing was allowing corruption to go unchecked as long as it aided his stay in power. There were many scandals which involved his cronies but no one was ever held accountable. Some of them include Willowgate and Ziscogate,  just to mention a few.

MDC provided Mugabe with his biggest challenge to power since 1980. He nearly lost a majority in parliament in 2000 and from then everyone who supported MDC, from students, trade unions and white farmers were viewed as enemies. Some of them were condemned to death.

In 2008 elections, Mugabe lost to Morgan Tsvangirai and what followed was a wave of killings in a state-sponsored operation code-named Operation Mavhotera Papi (Operation whom did you vote for). Hundreds of people were killed in cold blood including MDC’s youth leader Tonderai Ndira while others like Jestina Mukoko and Gandi Mudzingwa were abducted and kept incommunicado. This he did to force a Government of National Unity with him remaining at the helm.

When things became tougher Mugabe again to appease his people enacted the Indigenization Law which required foreigners to not own more than 49% of stake in any company in Zimbabwe. Just like during the land reform, his cronies grabbed companies without compensation and as a result, many of the companies collapsed.

Diamonds were discovered in Marange. Mugabe and his cronies especially those in the military mined the diamonds and sold them illicitly. Billions of dollars were siphoned out and very little ended up in Treasury. Today, military commanders and Mugabe own some of the biggest houses in Zimbabwe.

What I have written above is Mugabe’s legacy. Everything good was done with the clandestine intention to maintain power. Mugabe also used the state apparatus to kill civilians. His worst misdeed was forgiving himself for his sins on behalf of his victims. Every wave of violence terminated with a pardon of the perpetrators with no justice to the victims.

Today he is dead, the victims are littered across the world. I would advocate that every piece of his estate be liquidated and the proceeds are used to assist the families of his numerous victims. Unfortunately, this is just a pipe dream because the current junta in Zimbabwe is made up of the same people who were Mugabe’s henchmen!

Freeman Chari is a Human rights and social change activist

Mugabe…“The good men do is oft interred with their bones”
WATCH | Body of Zimbabwe’s Mugabe flown out of Singapore for burial

Post published in: Featured

WATCH | Body of Zimbabwe’s Mugabe flown out of Singapore for burial – The Zimbabwean

The body of Zimbabwe’s former president Robert Mugabe was flown home from Singapore on Wednesday morning, five days after he died in a hospital in the wealthy city-state. Police motorbikes escorted the white Mercedes hearse carrying Mugabe’s body from Singapore Casket, a funeral parlour where he had been kept since his death.

A plane carrying the former leader and the visiting delegation departed shortly afterwards, his nephew Adam Molai told AFP.

“It just left now,” he said by phone from the plane as it took off, with the noise of the aircraft audible in the background.

The delegation from Zimbabwe arrived on Tuesday and attended a private Catholic mass for Mugabe at the funeral parlour, which was officiated by a Zimbabwean priest.

Mugabe’s body was expected to arrive in Zimbabwe on Wednesday at 3pm (13:00 GMT), a family member told Reuters. From there, it will be taken to his home village in Kutama, west of the capital Harare, where he has been mourned as a hero and where there will be an overnight wake.

Mugabe died on Friday. He was 95.

Saturday funeral

The former guerrilla leader had dominated Zimbabwean politics for almost four decades from independence in 1980 until he was removed by his own army in a November 2017 coup.Revered by many as a liberator who freed his people from white minority rule, Mugabe was vilified by others for ruthlessly crushing his opponents and wrecking one of Africa’s most promising economies.On Thursday and Friday, Mugabe’s body will lie in state at Rufaro Stadium in the capital so the public can pay their respects.

The 35 000-seater stadium is where Mugabe took his oath of office when Ian Smith, the Prime Minister under the colonial Rhodesian regime, handed over power.

There Mugabe hoisted the new Zimbabwe flag and lit the independence flame on April 18, 1980 – bringing hope for a new era after a long guerrilla war.

The official funeral will be held on Saturday at the 60 000-seat National Sports Stadium in Harare and foreign leaders are expected to attend.

He will be buried on Sunday but the location remains unclear.

Mugabe’s family is resisting the government’s plan to bury him at the National Heroes Acre monument in the Harare and wants him to be interred in his home village, relatives have told Reuters.

Mugabe – A Legacy of Impunity, Death and Poverty
Mugabe’s body leaves Singapore funeral parlour

Post published in: Featured

Mugabe’s body leaves Singapore funeral parlour – The Zimbabwean

Mugabe, a guerrilla leader who swept to power after Zimbabwe’s independence from Britain and went on to rule for 37 years until he was ousted in 2017, died on Friday, aged 95.

His health deteriorated after he was toppled by the military and former loyalists in November 2017, ending an increasingly tyrannical rule that sent the economy into ruin.

Relatives and Zimbabwean government officials have travelled to Singapore, where Mugabe died after receiving treatment for several months, to collect his body. They will fly out later Wednesday.

A white hearse carrying Mugabe’s body left the funeral parlour, accompanied by police motorbikes, and drove past a group of journalists.

The visiting group, who include Vice President Kembo Mohadi, arrived on Tuesday and attended a private Catholic mass for Mugabe at the parlour, officiated by a Zimbabwean priest.

Zimbabweans have been divided over how to mourn a former leader once hailed as a liberation hero but who later brutally repressed his opponents.

On arrival in Zimbabwe, Mugabe’s body will be taken straight to his village in Kutama, in Zvimba district west of the capital Harare, for an overnight wake.

On Thursday and Friday the body will lie in state at Rufaro Stadium in Mbare township in Harare – where Mugabe took his oath of office — for the public to pay their final respects.

The official funeral will be held on Saturday at the giant 60,000-seat National Sports Stadium in Harare and foreign leaders are expected to attend.

His body will be buried on Sunday but the location remains unclear.

Mugabe’s family and President Emmerson Mnangagwa’s government are apparently at odds over whether it would be at his homestead northwest of Harare or at a shrine for liberation heroes in the capital.

Zimbabwe’s deepening crisis: Here’s why it’s time for a second government of national unity – The Zimbabwean

Crippling daily power outages of up to 18 hours and erratic supply of clean water are just some of the most obvious signs. Meanwhile, an inflation rate of over 500% has put the prices of basic goods beyond the reach of most people.

Hopes that the end of President Robert Mugabe’s ruinous rule in November 2017 would help put the country on a new path of peace and prosperity have long dissipated. Efforts by his successor President Emmerson Mnangagwa to attract foreign investors, who are critical in reviving Zimbabwe’s ailing economy, have also largely failed.

The situation has not been helped by the rejection of the 2018 presidential election results by the main opposition party. The Movement for Democratic Change Alliance (MDC-A) claims the governing Zanu-PF stole the elections even though the results were endorsed as free and fair by the African Union and Southern African Development Community (SADC). Only the European Union observers were somewhat circumspect in their assessment.

The opposition alliance has been calling for Mnangagwa’s government to relinquish power, and a national transitional authority appointed to run the country for at least two years, or until the 2023 general elections.

How individuals who will sit on the national transitional authority will be chosen and by whom, is not clear. But the party and some academics believe such a transitional authority would normalise Zimbabwe’s highly polarised political situation and help it revive its relations with the West.

The opposition may have a point on re-engagement with the West. This is key to helping end the investment drought that started in earnest between 2000 and 2003 under sanctions imposed by Western countries for human rights violations linked to Zanu-PF’s violent land reform seizures and election rigging.

But the transitional authority idea is doomed to fail because of lack of buy-in by Zanu-PF. So, it’s time to consider a more viable alternative path to peace for Zimbabwe.

Clamping down

For now, the government has dismissed talk of a transitional authority as unconstitutional. Instead, in May it launched its own platform, called the Political Actors Dialogue. The forum comprises 17 small political parties that participated in the 2018 elections.

The main opposition party is boycotting the process on grounds that Mnangagwa is an illegitimate president. Recently, it attempted to embark on public protests in the hope of bringing the government to its knees. The protests fell flat after being blocked by the courts and the police.

It boggles the mind why the MDC-A, led by Nelson Chamisa, insists on marches when previous attempts were crushed with brute force. These led to deaths in August 2018 and January 2019.

The Zanu-PF regime has always clamped down heavily on perceived threats to its rule since 1980. Why then does the MDC-A continue to endanger people’s lives through this deadly route as a way of resolving Zimbabwe’s socio-economic and political crises?

I firmly believe that the opposition needs to change tack and focus on entering into dialogue with the government.

Dialogue and unity government

Zimbabwe’s ongoing crisis requires the two leading political protagonists – Mnangagwa and Chamisa – to enter into serious dialogue. Both leaders need to soften their hard-line stances towards each other and put the people of Zimbabwe first.

There’s a precedent for this. Ten years ago, then South African President Thabo Mbeki managed to bring then President Mugabe and Movement for Democratic Change opposition leader Morgan Tsvangirai to the negotiation table.

The talks culminated in the formation of the government of national unity that ran Zimbabwe from February 2009 to July 2013, with Mugabe as the President and Tsvangirai as the Prime Minister. The unity government was fairly successful and managed to stabilise the economy.

Two decades of suffering have shown that it is not the threat of protests or sanctions from the West that can move Zanu-PF to change, but neighbouring countries under the aegis of SADC. South Africa is pivotal in this regard as the region’s strongest economic and military power.

It’s time to experiment with a second government of national unity for Zimbabwe. But for this to happen, SADC and South Africa must have the appetite to intervene in Zimbabwe. This is currently lacking.

Dialogue in Zimbabwe’s history

Historically, dialogue has moved Zimbabwe forward as a nation during its darkest hours.

  • A year before independence in 1980, battle-hardened guerrilla commanders agreed to talk to the then Rhodesian Prime Minister, Ian Smith, to end Zimbabwe’s liberation war even though they were convinced that they were winning.
  • In 1987 Joshua Nkomo, who was the leader of the main opposition party, the Zimbabwean African People’s Union, agreed to talk to his political nemesis, then Prime Minister Mugabe. Yet before this, he had been hounded out of the country by Mugabe in the mid-80s, and thousands of his supporters killed.
  • More recently in 2009, Morgan Tsvangirai agreed to enter into a unity government with Mugabe, despite winning the first round of the 2008 elections. The unity government briefly resuscitated and stabilised Zimbabwe’s fragile economy. Hyperinflation was tamed, basic commodities became available again and people regained purchasing power.

The way forward

Given the MDC-A’s positive contribution during its brief stint in the 2009-2013 unity government, the party should be expending its energies on dialogue. The main opposition party can enter into a second government of national unity, but continue building and strengthening its own support.

In the same vein, Zanu-PF also needs to realise that without the involvement of the MDC-A, its attempts to revive the economy and end the strife in the country, on its own terms, are destined to fail.The Conversation

Tapiwa Chagonda, Associate Professor of Sociology, University of Johannesburg

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

Mugabe’s body leaves Singapore funeral parlour
MDC postpones 20th Anniversary Celebrations

Post published in: Business

The Dan Markel Case: Trial Approaches

Sigfredo Garcia and Katherine Magbanua (mugshots courtesy of Leon County Sheriff’s Office)

Is it finally here? After years of continuances and delays, and more than five long years after Dan Markel’s killing, could (some of) his murderers finally face justice?

The trial of two alleged murderers of Markel, the Florida State University law professor who was shot and killed in July 2014, will start on September 23. Last Wednesday, lawyers for the two defendants, Sigfredo Garcia and Katherine Magbanua, told the court that they are ready to go to trial.

There’s still some pretrial wrangling going on, including arguments over witnesses. But barring something unforeseen, a final pretrial conference will take place on September 19, and jury selection will begin on September 23. The trial is expected to run between three and six weeks.

(I offer the “barring something unforeseen” caveat because, as followers of these proceedings well know, something always seems to come up on the brink of trial. I’ll believe trial has started once the jury is seated and lawyers are delivering opening statements. But this is the closest we’ve ever gotten to trial; 750 jury summonses have already been issued.)

Speaking of wrangling over testimony… when I last wrote about the case, back in June, I urged Judge James Hankinson to reconsider his decision to deny the defense a deposition of Wendi Adelson, Dan Markel’s ex-wife. As it turns out, Judge Hankinson did just that, and Wendi was duly deposed.

And speaking of Wendi Adelson… Jason Solomon, a friend of Dan Markel, has started an online petition that’s essentially an open letter to Wendi, urging her to allow Dan’s parents, Ruth and Phil Markel, to see their two grandchildren. As of this writing, the petition has 657 signatures; you can review and sign it here.

The case for allowing the Markels to see their grandchildren, whom they have not seen for more than three years, is exceedingly strong. If the petition isn’t enough for you, read Solomon’s thoughtful and compelling Medium essay on the subject.

To be sure, Solomon’s piece has a provocative title — What Should Happen When Your Mom and Brother Murder Your Ex? — but in terms of its content, it’s quite fair-minded. It acknowledges the arguments against allowing the Markels to see their grandkids (which it then refutes, in my view persuasively). And unlike many of the armchair sleuths who follow the case, Solomon expresses the view that Wendi was not involved in the planning of her ex-husband’s murder.

In other news about Wendi Adelson, it appears that she’s no longer the executive director of the IMPAC Fund, a position she assumed in the summer of 2017. If you go to the website of the immigration-focused nonprofit, you’ll see that Kathy Bird Carvajal is now its executive director.

What’s Wendi Adelson up to now? We don’t know. Her LinkedIn profile still lists her as ED of the IMPAC Fund. Whether her departure from the organization has anything to do with the Markel case is also unclear.

My guess is no. Mike Fernandez, the billionaire founder of the Fund, has already spoken out in defense of Wendi, who disclosed the circumstances surrounding her husband’s death to the Fund prior to her appointment.

And as one source of mine who knows Wendi socially told me, Fernandez is just one of several high-profile, civic-minded individuals who have embraced Wendi since her return to South Florida. It’s quite possible that Wendi, through these connections, has found another job.

But here’s one thing I think it’s safe to say: don’t expect to see Wendi Adelson anywhere near that courtroom on September 23.[1]

P.S. For those of you who are new to this story and looking to catch up (and there’s a lot to catch up on), I refer you to two well-done, long-form treatments about the case that came out over the summer: Steve Miller’s piece for the Miami New Times, and the Tallahassee Democrat piece by Karl Etters, who has been covering the case since its inception.

P.P.S. For those of you who listened to Over My Dead Body, the podcast that focused on the Markel case for its first season, it just launched its second season, focused on a different case. And the first season will be coming to television — even though the story of the Markel case is far from over.

[1] It’s possible that Wendi might appear later in the trial to testify. As you’ll recall, the reason the defense sought to depose her is because she was listed as a possible witness by the prosecution, purportedly to supply background information and explain some of the relationships in the case. But I wouldn’t expert her to appear at the trial of her own accord — even though the proceedings are of obvious interest to her.

What Should Happen When Your Mom and Brother Murder Your Ex? [Medium]
Let Dan Markel’s Parents See their Grandkids [iPetitions]
Friend starts petition for Dan Markel’s parents to visit his children [WTXL]
Trial nears for Dan Markel murder case [WTXL]
Markel case still on track for trial later this month [WCTV]
Friend starts petition for Dan Markel’s parents to visit his children [WTXL]
A Professor’s Murder in Tallahassee Was a Contract Hit, Prosecutors Say [Miami New Times]


DBL square headshotDavid Lat, the founding editor of Above the Law, is a writer, speaker, and legal recruiter at Lateral Link, where he is a managing director in the New York office. David’s book, Supreme Ambitions: A Novel (2014), was described by the New York Times as “the most buzzed-about novel of the year” among legal elites. David previously worked as a federal prosecutor, a litigation associate at Wachtell Lipton, and a law clerk to Judge Diarmuid F. O’Scannlain of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. You can connect with David on Twitter (@DavidLat), LinkedIn, and Facebook, and you can reach him by email at dlat@laterallink.com.

Reading Between The Lines: Understanding Legal Client Needs

The legal industry continues to grapple with the idea that clients are in control. How do law firms protect and grow profits as clients put more pressure on them to do more with less and at an ever-decreasing cost? What’s more, many clients struggle to articulate precisely how they expect firms to meet these expectations.

What may seem like an impossible problem is actually a manifestation of the larger cultural shift to customer-centric commerce. The rise of the on-demand economy has created an expectation that all businesses, including lawyers and law firms, deliver new experiences that meet unexpressed or underserved expectations. For example, very few travelers were asking to stay in strangers homes 10 years ago, but today, this mode of lodging is widely accepted. Among some, it’s even preferred.

This white paper provides:

  • An overview of the current market including statistical trends;
  • Strategies for creating a plan to uncover and document client needs; and
  • A guide with critical probing questions to ask clients.

MDC postpones 20th Anniversary Celebrations – The Zimbabwean

Former Zimbabwean President Robert Mugabe

As MDC, being a Pan-Africanist and social democratic party, consistent with our values of ubuntu, solidarity and empathy we have decided to postpone our 20th Anniversary Celebrations to the  28th September 2019 so as to allow  the funeral proceedings and events not to compete with our Anniversary celebrations.  This is in line with our values of ubuntu, solidarity and empathetic leadership.

We had our differences, which are well documented and recorded, with the late President Mugabe, but this is not the time to rehash those differences.  This is the time to join the former President’s relatives and friends in mourning.

In order to give peace a chance and allow for nation building in the context of tolerance and human dignity, we continue to deploy our might and main to things that unite us than those that may divide us.

The MDC does not make profit out of tragedies. For that reason, the party would not use Mugabe’s death to score political points. We have sufficient avenues and platforms to address the huge challenges facing the motherland outside funerals.

As a Pan Africanist and Social Democratic Party, we don’t take our differences with our political adversaries to the grave. Hurt and hatred is not part of our agenda.

The passing on of former President Mugabe should remind leaders of today, tomorrow and the future on how we must treat each other as Zimbabweans. The position we take today is not to wish away issues of transitional justice to do with past injustice but to exhibit that as the MDC our role is to heal, unite and bring freedom and justice to every Zimbabwean.

To all Zimbabweans, this is an opportunity to reflect on values of nation-building, national healing, democracy, tolerance, justice, equality, freedom and solidarity that are central to our democratic struggle.

Let us take this moment to build upon the positives of the past and negate its negatives to build a better nation and a better future. We must correct past mistakes and right the wrongs. We must learn from the omissions and commissions of the past.

Thank You
God Bless You
God Bless Zimbabwe