Police and army set to get lion’s share of Zimbabwe’s budget – The Zimbabwean

Zimbabwe’s army and police have been central in suppressing protests from the opposition as well as workers.
Image: Zinyange AUNTONY / AFP

Zimbabwe’s army and police are poised to get the biggest chunks of the 2020 national budget, which finance minister Mthuli Ncube has revised to far exceed the initial ceiling of ZWL$28bn (about US$1.77bn or R26.1bn).

This has been revealed in a document produced this week by the minister, titled “2020 Pre-Budget Parliamentary Consultation Meetings; October 30 to November 4 2019”.

According to the document, the defence forces require ZWL$25bn, while home affairs requires ZWL$32bn.

Since Zimbabwe’s disputed July 2018 polls, the army and police have been central in suppressing protests from the opposition as well as workers’ unions. The opposition has vowed to keep putting pressure on President Emmerson Mnangagwa’s establishment, while workers continue to give it headaches. As a result, allocating more funds to the security forces is strategic, say analysts.

On Wednesday, civil servants were set to stage protests in Harare. Police have said they will only intervene if these turn violent.

“The regulating authority still reserves the right to stop the gathering should it turn out to be a public-order threat or violent,” said Chief Superintendent Oscar Mugomeri of the Zimbabwe Republic Police (ZRP) in a letter to the Apex Council, an umbrella body for government workers’ welfare.

Almost half of Zimbabwe’s 16-million people are faced with starvation, both in urban and rural areas. For survival, food aid and cash packages have been supplied to the most vulnerable by the donor community.

Agriculture is set to be allocated ZWL$14bn. Industry, which is meant to be the cornerstone of economic revival, gets an underwhelming ZWL$6bn.

Health workers’ ongoing disappointment is set to continue. According to the document they will get ZWL$18bn, the third highest allocation. Doctors have been on strike for at least three months while nurses are on a go-slow.

Prince Harry to pump R118m into Zimbabwe rhino conservation

Post published in: Featured

Prince Harry to pump R118m into Zimbabwe rhino conservation – The Zimbabwean

British royal Prince Harry wants to invest $8m (about R118m) in the next five years as part of a joint venture between his African Parks NGO and Zimbabwe government’s national parks (ZimParks) to revive the country’s flagship rhino haven.

The 1,407km2 Matusadona National Park — also known as Kariba National Park — is in the northwest of Zimbabwe on the southern shores of Lake Kariba. It used to house about 35% of Zimbabwe’s black rhino population.

However, years of abandon and syndicate-led poaching destroyed the park, which was created in 1958 when conservationist Rupert Fothergill orchestrated “Operation Noah” and moved animals away from the newly constructed Kariba Dam.

Today, animals struggle to get by. There is diminished interest from tourists, with park chalets and other infrastructure for human habitations destroyed.

It appears the interest of Prince Harry, who was officially named African Parks’ president in December 2017, comes just in time. “We are extremely delighted,” said ZimParks spokesperson Tinashe Farawo.

The joint venture between African Parks and ZimParks gives the new investor a shareholding of 49% with the Zimbabwe government, through ZimParks, retaining 51%. Profits will be shared on a quarterly basis.

“It’s a business-structured deal that should see us working together for the next 20 years. Day-to-day running of the park will be an inclusive affair on a rotational basis,” said Farawo.

Considering the damage to infrastructure at the park, the next five years will be mostly dedicated to reconstruction using money brought in by the investor. “They have their own way of sourcing funds and in our contract within the next five years they should have ploughed in $8m,” he said.

Farawo said that the highlight of the agreement is the re-introduction the black rhinoceros, which has been completely wiped out from the park by poaching. The few rhinos that survived at the height of the onslaught were shipped to other secure areas.

Writing in the UK’s Daily Telegraph a few weeks ago, after his visit to Africa, Prince Harry said, “Matusadona is a very special place for Zimbabwe and has a lot of potential for tourism and socio-economic development.”

The deal was signed by African Parks CEO Peter Fearnhead and ZimParks director-general Fulton Mangwanya on Friday, November 1. At the signing, Fearnhead emphasised that his organisation works in 10 African countries and manages more than 10-million animals in 16 parks — and that working in Zimbabwe would be routine.

ZimParks officials said Prince Harry’s profile and wide international goodwill is a major boost for the park at a time when Zimbabwe’s international reputation is in tatters.

Said a senior ZimParks employee, “At a government and diplomatic level things are bad. Our leaders are bickering over sanctions and other things; but at our level, we have a British royal family member working with us. That’s a seal of approval and, as such, tourists have no reason to worry about what politicians say.”

Zimbabwe should simplify its IP laws, says government official – The Zimbabwean

Zimbabwe should simplify its IP laws to benefit inventors, a government official has said in the run-up to an IP conference in the country.

Speaking at a media conference yesterday, November 4, secretary in the Ministry of Justice Legal and Parliamentary Affairs, Virginia Mabhiza, said “though Zimbabwe has legal frameworks which cater for IP, it is high time the country simplifies it for the understanding of beneficiaries”.

She said to do this, the country needs to raise awareness about the laws that currently exist in the country, as well as clarify them.

“We all know there is a value chain in order for one to benefit from IP. For instance, if a song by a local artist is also listened to in the US, how does the artist get their royalties? These are some of the laws that we should simplify so that beneficiaries will appreciate them and earn money from,” Mabhiza said.

The news, reported by the country’s state-controlled broadcaster, Zimbabwe Broadcasting Corporation, comes shortly before Zimbabwe is set to host the WAO Conference on Innovation, IP and Value Addition for Business Competitiveness and Sustainable Development in Africa from November 5-8.

The conference is in collaboration with the World Intellectual Property Organization and the Zimbabwe IP Office.

“We are looking forward to this conference for it encourages a pro-IP attitude which will help in building IP in all spheres of business and research,” Mabhiza said.

She added: “We hope it will provide an ideal platform for sharing views and ideas as well as improving the understanding of the importance of IP for sustainable development.”

More than 100 elephants die amid severe drought in Zimbabwe – The Zimbabwean

In this Oct, 27, 2019, photo, an elephant walks next to a carcass of another elephant in an almost dry pool that used to be a perennial water supply in Mana Pools National Park, Zimbabwe. AP

Mana Pools, Zimbabwe — Weak from hunger and thirst, the elephant struggled to reach a pool of water in this African wildlife reserve. But the majestic mammal got stuck in the mud surrounding the sun-baked watering hole, which had dramatically shrunk due to a severe drought.

Eventually park staff freed the trapped elephant, but it collapsed and died. Just yards away lay the carcass of a Cape buffalo that had also been pulled from the mud, but was attacked by hungry lions.

Elephants, zebras, hippos, impalas, buffaloes and many other wildlife are stressed by lack of food and water in Zimbabwe’s Mana Pools National Park, whose very name comes from the four pools of water normally filled by the flooding Zambezi River each rainy season, and where wildlife traditionally drink. The word “mana” means four in the Shona language.

At least 105 elephants have died in Zimbabwe’s wildlife reserves, most of them in Mana and the larger Hwange National Park in the past two months, according to the Zimbabwe National Parks and Wildlife Management Authority. Many desperate animals are straying from Zimbabwe’s parks into nearby communities in search of food and water.

Zimbabwe Wildlife Drought In this Oct, 27, 2019, photo, the carcass of a buffalo lies on the edges of a sun baked pool that used to be a perennial water supply in Mana Pools National Park, Zimbabwe. AP

Mana Pools, a UNESCO World Heritage Site for its splendid setting along the Zambezi River, annually experiences hot, dry weather at this time of year. But this year it’s far worse as a result of poor rains last year. Even the river’s flow has reduced.

The drought parching southern Africa is also affecting people. An estimated 11 million people are threatened with hunger in nine countries in the region, according to the World Food Program, which is planning large-scale food distribution. The countries of southern Africa have experienced normal rainfall in only one of the past five growing seasons, it said.

Seasonal rains are expected soon, but parks officials and wildlife lovers, fearing that too many animals will die before then, are bringing in food to help the distressed animals. The extremely harsh conditions persuaded park authorities to abandon their usual policy of not intervening.

Each morning, Munyaradzi Dzoro, a parks agency wildlife officer, prays for rain.

“It’s beginning to be serious,” he said, standing next to the remains of the elephant and buffalo. “It might be worse if we fail to receive rains” by early November. The last substantial rains came in April, he said.

An early end to a “very poor rainy season” has resulted in insufficient natural vegetation to see the animals through, said Mel Hood, who is participating in the Feed Mana project, which is providing supplementary feeding.

Zimbabwe Wildlife Drought In this Oct, 27, 2019, photo, a bird stands on a sun-baked pool that used to be a perennial water supply in Mana Pools National Park, Zimbabwe.AP

Most of the animals in Mana Pools “are more or less confined to the barren flood plains,” where temperatures soar to 113 degrees Fahrenheit,she said.

Separated from neighboring Zambia by the Zambezi, the region’s once reliable sources of water have turned into death traps for animals desperate to reach the muddy ponds. Like the elephant and buffalo, many other animals in the park have gotten stuck in the clay while trying to reach Long Pool, the largest of the watering holes at 3 miles (5 kilometers) long.

The animals were pulled out by rangers, but they could not survive predators on the pounce for weak prey.

“The carnivores attacked it from behind,” Dzoro said of the buffalo. The elephant carcass had been there for almost a week and emitted a strong stench as flies feasted on it.

At just 5% of its normal size, Long Pool is one of the few remaining water sources across the park’s plains. On a recent day, hippos were submerged in some puddles to try to keep their skin from drying out in the extreme heat while birds picked at catfish stranded in the mud.

Two others of Mana’s pools have completely dried up, while the third is just 20% to 30% of its usual size and dwindling, Dzoro said.

There are more than 12,000 elephants roaming Mana’s flood plains as well as an abundance of lions, buffaloes, zebras, wild dogs, hyenas, zebras and elands. The animals are visibly affected by the drought. Some impalas show signs of skin mange. In addition to the land animals, the park has 350 bird and aquatic species, according to the parks agency.

In other parts of Mana, park authorities are pumping water from deep boreholes, but the supplies are barely enough, he said.

“We used to say nature should take its course,” Dzoro said of the park’s normal policy of not intervening and allowing the ecosystem to find its own balance.

“We are now forced to intervene, which is manipulative conservation, because we are not sure when and how we will receive the rain. To avoid losing animals we have to intervene to maintain population sizes,” Dzoro said.

With the acacias, other indigenous trees and grasses that provide the bulk of food for herbivores like elephants and buffaloes also decimated by the drought, authorities began supplementary feeding in July.

Trucks and tractors ferry hay to various locations in the 2,196- square-kilometer (848-square-mile) park. In some spots, elephants, buffaloes and zebras are fed next to each other. The Feed Mana project has so far trucked 14,000 bales to the park, said Hood, the animal welfare campaigner.

The group has been appealing for “urgent” donations of items such as soy bean hay, grass and cubes made of nutritious grains and molasses.

“Although it may not be enough to stave off all the hunger pangs, it is certainly giving these animals a chance to survive until conditions improve,” Hood said.

Zimbabwe has an estimated 85,000 elephants and neighboring Botswana has more than 130,000. The two countries have the largest elephant population in the world. Zimbabwe says it’s struggling to cope with booming numbers of wild elephants and is pushing to be allowed to sell its ivory stockpile and export live elephants to raise money for conservation and ease congestion in the drought-affected parks.

Other African countries, especially Kenya, are opposed to any sale of ivory. And earlier this year the meeting of the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species voted to continue the ban on all ivory sales.

At Mana Pools, saving the animals is a challenge and officials say Zimbabwe is severely affected by climate change that has changed weather patterns.

In past years, Mana Pools would get up to 24 inches (600 millimeters) of rain per year, said Dzoro, the wildlife officer. Now it’s lucky to get half that.

With such a dramatic reduction, “we can’t have perennial sources to sustain animals and some of the perennial springs have dried up. Climate change is affecting us. That’s why the manipulative way now is the only way to rescue our fauna,” Dzoro said.

“Climate change is real for sure, we are witnessing it,” he said.

Zimbabwe should simplify its IP laws, says government official
Doctors unmoved by the government’s decision to fire them

Post published in: Environment

Thanks So Very Much To All Of Our Sponsors

Advertising

We appreciate your support.

We’d like to express gratitude to our fantastic sponsors here at Above the Law:

If you’re interested in advertising on Above the Law or any other site in the Breaking Media network, please download our media kits or email advertising.

—ADVERTISEMENT—

From the Above the Law Network

Daiichi Sankyo sues Seattle Genetics over antibody-drug conjugate technology – MedCity News

A Japanese drugmaker is suing a U.S.-based biotech company over the latter’s claims to intellectual property dating back to a now defunct partnership between the two.

Tokyo-based Daiichi Sankyo said Monday that it had sued Seattle Genetics in the District Court of Delaware after it said Seattle Genetics laid claim to intellectual property rights related to Daiichi Sankyo’s’s antibody-drug conjugate products. The claims concern a partnership between the two companies to develop ADCs that lasted from 2008 until 2015, and in particular technology used in the drug DS-8201 (trastuzumab deruxtecan), under development for breast and other cancers.

In its own statement Monday, Seattle Genetics said that technology used in Daiichi Sankyo’s DS-8201 and other drug candidates “rightfully belongs to Seattle Genetics” under the partnering agreement the two companies entered in 2008. The biotech, based in the Seattle suburb of Bothell, Washington, said that the linker and other ADC technologies used in the drugs are improvements over its own technology. Daiichi Sankyo said Seattle Genetics’ claims were without merit.

For its part, Daiichi Sankyo has stated that DS-8201 is based on its own, proprietary technology, DXd, which also forms the backbone of another of its drug candidates, the Phase I/II DS-7300, designed to target the B7-H3 antigen in various solid tumors.

ADCs are like biological guided missiles, consisting of a monoclonal antibody targeted to a cell-surface antigen that delivers a pharmaceutical payload. Linkers are an essential component to ADCs because if improperly constructed, the pharmaceutical agent can break off prematurely, rendering the drug ineffective or causing off-target toxicity. Approved ADCs include Seattle Genetics’ only current marketed product, Adcetris (brentuximab vedotin), which works by targeting the CD30 antigen in Hodgkin’s lymphoma and certain T-cell lymphomas, and Pfizer’s Mylotarg (gemtuzumab ozogamicin) and Besponsa (inotuzumab ozogamicin), which respectively target CD33 in acute myeloid leukemia and CD22 in acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Seattle Genetics and Daiichi Sankyo developed Adcetris – originally called SGN-35 – under the former partnership.

DS-8201 is also the subject of a $7 billion partnership between Daiichi Sankyo and British drugmaker AstraZeneca announced in March. The development and commercialization agreement included an upfront payment of $1.35 billion from AstraZeneca to Daiichi Sankyo, as well as contingent payments of up to $5.55 billion, which would include $3.8 billion in regulatory milestones and $1.75 billion in sales milestones.

Photo: fstop123, Getty Images

2 Dumb 2 Crime

Politics

Republicans are going back to arguing that Trump is too much of an idiot to be impeached.

—ADVERTISEMENT—

From the Above the Law Network

Why Local CLEs Are Endangered: Speaking To Non-Lawyers Is Rewarding, Speaking To Lawyers Is Self-Torture

There are a lot of great continuing legal education programs out there. Today, lawyers can quite easily go online, and for a reasonable fee, learn something useful while working to fulfil their periodic CLE requirements.

But, like the black rhinoceros or the northern long-eared bat, good local CLEs where one might learn something useful about regional quirks of practice, or even the local legal community itself, are increasingly tough to come by. This is especially true in undersaturated legal markets.

If you ask my opinion, which is admittedly not based on a lot of hard evidence, but is backed by a voluminous sheaf of anecdotal experience speaking to many groups of both lawyers and non-lawyers, there is a very intuitive reason for that. Speaking to non-lawyers is rewarding, character-building, and fun. Speaking to lawyers, on the other hand, is like hacking off your hopelessly entrapped arm with a dull pocket knife.

The most recent example of this in my own life came about this past weekend, when I gave a presentation at a non-legal conference to a group of (mostly) non-lawyers. I know a thing or two about the topic, but the topic was legal only to the extent that I am a lawyer who writes about the law (and a lot of other stuff) and that background obviously colors my perspective on things that are not the law. The speech was overwhelmingly well-received. There were a dozen people waiting for me afterward who wanted to shake my hand, tell me what a great job I did, thank me for all the useful information I imparted, and chat just a little more about their individual situations. I was very happy to have apparently been of some value to these folks.

And then, waiting for me at the end of the line, was the former lawyer in the room. She did not want to shower me with compliments. Instead, she wanted to make it very clear that she was offended and upset, specifically by one sentence of an hour-long presentation, about something that made it into the content essentially only as a part of my bio. I guess her legal career had a bit of overlap with a part of mine, and she felt as though I had besmirched that part by stating something uncouthly.

I was cool, I was diplomatic, I apologized profusely, I assured her that I did not mean what I had said in the way that she had apparently taken it, and I promised that I would take her note to heart in the event I gave this presentation again in the future. After delivering a stern lecture on how we are lawyers and we thus need to choose our words very carefully, she finally let me go to lunch, offering a parting platitude to the effect of, “…and some of the other stuff you said was useful, I guess.”

I have had some variation of this experience again, and again, and again. That’s not to say that I never receive compliments from lawyers I’ve spoken to, or criticisms from non-lawyers. I invite criticisms: Every time I speak publicly about anything, I tell the audience that there is a lot of knowledge in the room beyond just mine and to raise your hand so we can have a conversation in front of the group if anyone has anything to add or to dispute. It’s just that when non-lawyers disagree with something, they seem to do it kindly and substantively, whereas the lawyers (and many more of them) continually scan for anything, however arbitrary or tangential, that they can meanly split hairs about.

I suppose some of that is a function of the way we’re trained to think by the job. I’ve never given an argument in court and heard this response from opposing counsel:

You got me! Your Honor, his argument is so airtight that there is nothing about it I can exploit, misinterpret, or take out of context to further my own agenda. You win some, you lose some, I suppose.

Another aspect of it, again, just in my opinion, is the extreme arrogance and self-importance that infects our profession. When you are speaking to a room full of lawyers, a significant portion of your audience thinks they are better than you, thinks they are smarter than you, and feels the need to prove this either by challenging you in front of your peers or by later trashing you to other lawyers behind your back. It’s unpleasant.

Maybe I’m wrong. I know I’ll get a lot of complaints and criticisms on this very article. But the further I get into my career, the more I see the miniscule rewards of giving a live presentation to lawyers as being far outweighed by the hellish nastiness of the whole ordeal. As for non-lawyers, well, please keep those speaking invitations coming. I’d love to have a chat with your group.


Jonathan Wolf is a litigation associate at a midsize, full-service Minnesota firm. He also teaches as an adjunct writing professor at Mitchell Hamline School of Law, has written for a wide variety of publications, and makes it both his business and his pleasure to be financially and scientifically literate. Any views he expresses are probably pure gold, but are nonetheless solely his own and should not be attributed to any organization with which he is affiliated. He wouldn’t want to share the credit anyway. He can be reached at jon_wolf@hotmail.com.