Terror War in my Hood… MaShurugwi – The Zimbabwean

By August 2019, Glendale in Mazoe was under siege. The whole city had a 6 Oclock curfew. 6 women were found murdered in the once serene Glendale Country club, within a month.
Mainly, the dismembered body parts, decapitated heads and 1 woman had a beer bottle embedded in her genitals.
The Shurugwis had come home. They marched along unimpeded, fearless, brazen and the law never caught up with them.
They were and are invincible.

It was around 2 am , 2 weeks before Christmas, when my phone went off.
My Mum was calling. I feared for my Dad.
My heart sank when I heard my Mum screaming and saying some Mambo Jumbo gibberish into the phone.
I drove as fast as I could, I found her dressed, my father by her side. Confused.
She said we needed to rush to Glendale. Nyasha, my cousin, had been slashed with a Machete by a Mushurugwi at Jumbo mine.
She wasn’t done. 2 of my cousins were missing. Feared dead. My Uncle had phoned.

My Uncle had been resettled at one of the farms. The hut where everyone had congregated, was poorly lit.
Blood welcomed us from the door to a heap of blankets where my aunt was trying to apply some medical aid. One look at Nyasha, I felt sick. How could a human being have inflicted such to another human being?
Half his face was gone. You could see some dangling teeth. A bone was protruding from his right arm. His left eye spoke to us. Death was imminent.

Before I could talk to anyone, a rundown Honda fit screeched outside. Some Korokozas had picked the 2nd victim. An orphan that my Uncle took care of from birth, had just been brought home. He was with Nyasha when disaster struck.

He was completely butchered. The boys kept bringing some body parts from the car. He was put next to Nyasha.
Concession hospital had no ambulances. Bindura was packed, ambulances would take hours. We drove to Howard Hospital.
We met the 3rd victim, Tonde there. Thank God, he suffered a few lacerations.

He narrated the harrowing story. They were underground for 5 days mining. They were supposed to come out of the tunnel that day when MaBhudhi arrived shouting Murudo Murudo.
Allow me to explain.

MaBhudhi are the most feared group of MaShurugwis. Untouchable and invincible. The police are scared of them. They are the leaders.

Although the Army’s Support Unit mann the entrances and search for any weapons and confiscate them, Mabhudhis somehow roam around freely with their Machetes called Colombias. Purchased in Msasa Harare. They cost about USD40 each. Razor Blade sharp, that one slash decapitates one’s head without effort.

Its a well-known fact that when Mabhudhi approaches you, listen to their lingo.
If they say Murudo Murudo or Murudho Murudho( Ndebele Shurugwis), all they are saying is “Give us all you have mined, even if you have been down here for a month, we mean no harm, it’s all done with love, mine some more and handover to us, and no harm will come your way”

Murudo murudo is welcome. For one is willing to spare your life.
You resist, you are a goner. Simple.
Every miner understands this. Except for Nyasha and his cousins. They were virgins in this field and were ill-prepared.
The love for money drove them, without fully researching the trade.

That is how Mabhudhi’s approached them. But they thought they would put up a fight, without any weapon.
He was shaking as he narrated the events of the night.
One Bhudhi turned to Nyasha and said, ” Zvino iwe chinun’una zvowohoramba nemahwe, unoti Maiguru vako vanohodleyi kumba?” Nyasha said he didn’t care. Those were his last words. For he wasn’t prepared for the disciplinary action that followed.

The Dr walked in, looking sombre and lethargic. Nyasha had closed his eyes indefinitely.
30mins later, death claimed the 2nd victim.
I was in a daze. It was a nightmare in slow motion. The wailing.
They were both aged 17. Nyasha was waiting for his O level results. They are still not out.

Tonde described how Mabhudhi went around slashing people indiscriminately. More bodies laid unclaimed underground.
A week later, I visited the place in Jumbo.
The place was a metropolis marinated with some bedlumic clamour. Kids below 20, speaking some funny language, dirty. They rushed to the car checking if I had brought some Musombodhiya or Weed. Some exhibited some fine tremors typical of drug abuse.
I realised if I so much as ventured outside my car, I would be gone in less than no time. There were thousands of people around, miners and traders alike, adding to the concert.

Before I could say Jack Robinson, there was a stampede of Biblical proportions.

Some Mabhudhis had gone on a revenge killing rampage on the other Mabhudhis. Likely the ones that killed my cousins.
1 Mabhudhi was brought from underground. His head was chopped 3 times with an axe.
I saw a glimpse of his limpy body for people were vying for his blood.
2 bodies were rushed to the hospital, but sadly died en route.

I knew it was time to leave. Good decision, for the Riot police, descended on the site in full force and spared no one.
The most feared MaShurugwis are Goliath and Satan.

I have seen the good side of humanity, I had never been exposed to such cruelty. I feel sick to the stomach as I write this.

I never knew Zimbabwe would descend to such lows. Boko Haram they say.

THIS NEEDS FIXING!! YESTERDAY.
We need a War Like Contingency Planning to curb this and it can be done. Why is it taking long??

Post published in: Featured

Healthcare IPOs in 2019: The rise of digital health and biopharma unicorns (Updated) – MedCity News

Note: This post has been updated with data from Cooley

Despite the fact that 2019 was a big year for digital health initial public offerings after a quiet couple of years, biopharma companies continued to dominate  healthcare and life science IPOs last year, continuing a multi-year trend.  A new eBook from MedCity News spotlights some of the more interesting deals and trends this year across digital health and biopharma.

There were 72 healthcare and life science IPOs last year in the U.S., according to data from the law firm Cooley.

A clutch of digital health companies splashed onto the public markets in 2019, reflecting the increased confidence in the long-term viability of these companies and the sector, such as chronic disease management business Livongo Health, health IT and data analytics company Health Catalyst and patient-intake technology company Phreesia.

A handful of healthcare companies saw their share price surge, such as 10x Genomics, a gene sequencing tech business, whose initial share price of $39 jumped from $52.75 on its debut in September to end the year at $76.25.

There were also some unicorns among the biopharma businesses such as Alector and Gossamer Bio.

The focus of the businesses behind these IPOs spanned a diverse range from organ transplant technology (TransMedics) to  fertility benefits (Progyny) to teledentistry (SmileDirectClub). Companies also demonstrated considerable age differences. Phreesia, for example, started in 2005, while 89Bio, a company with a lead drug aimed at treating nonalcoholic steatohepatitis, or NASH, only launched last year.

Acknowledging the trend of pre-revenue biopharma companies listing on Nasdaq to advance their fundraising and commercialization efforts, NYSE changed its rules to accommodate these companies last year. Under the new provision, the NYSE adopted a discounted annual fee schedule for businesses with negligible  revenue, as long as their global market capitalization is at least $200 million and meets other listing requirements.

Download it now by providing your information below.

Photo: jxfzsy, Getty Images

Prosecutors Have Been Using The Wrong Insider Trading Law All This Time

GirlsDoPorn Vultures Hit With $13M Verdict For Preying On Young Girls

(Image via Getty)

Score one for the good guys. Yesterday, Judge Kevin Enright of San Diego County’s Superior Court issued a preliminary decision ordering the owners of the website GirlsDoPorn.com to pay the 23 unnamed plaintiffs $9.5 million in compensatory damages and $3.3 million in punitive damages for deceptive and unfair business practices, using shell entities to hide corporate ownership and assets, fraudulently obtaining contracts, misappropriation of likeness, and fraudulent transfer.

The case was filed in 2016 by Jane Does 1-22, who were girls and women ages 18 to 23 who responded to an online job posting for adult modeling. Jane Doe “A” was added in October, because unbelievably the Defendants continued to run their scheme enticing young women to shoot pornographic videos under false pretenses, even after the case was filed. They do appear to have stopped after federal sex trafficking and child pornography charges were filed though.

The Defendants convinced hundreds of women to shoot pornographic scenes in a scheme that would be comically evil if it weren’t so tragic.

They assured the women that the footage would never be posted online, vaguely alluding to a “private collector,” perhaps in Australia. In fact the videos were posted almost immediately to the Defendants’ own subscription sites, with additional clips posted on free portals like PornHub.com.

The Defendants supplied “reference models” who told the women that it would be a safe, fun experience. In fact, many of the “references” had not themselves shot videos. And when the women were flown to San Diego, they found themselves alone in a room with several strange men who wouldn’t give them their plane tickets home if they didn’t go through with the video. Multiple defendants testified that the defendants blocked the doors with furniture to prevent them leaving.

The Defendants assured the women that no one they knew would ever find out. In fact, the Court found that “Defendants deliberately profited from the videos being leaked to Plaintiffs’ personal circles and communities.” According to The Daily Beast, which has covered this story extensively, the Defendants tried to make the videos go viral by sharing them within the woman’s social media networks, resulting in harassment and humiliation. Worse, the women were immediately doxxed by trollsites devoted to the purpose, with the active participation of the Defendants, who, according to the Court, “encouraged and facilitated this outing process and even participated directly.”

The Defendants were verbally promised that they would receive between $2,500 and $5,000 for a thirty minute shoot, after which the footage would be processed onto DVDs for private sale overseas. Moments before the shooting, which often ran several times as long, the women were coerced into quickly signing contracts which buried references to online distribution under several pages of dense legalese.

The Plaintiffs read a “script” at the beginning of the shoot attesting that, “I {real name} am doing this scene for BLL Media of my own free will and I am of sound mind and body. I am not under the influence of drugs or any mind altering substances.” In fact, the Defendants routinely gave the women alcohol and/or marijuana before shooting, even though many of the Plaintiffs were under 21.

The Defendants hid their assets in a series of shell companies in Vanuatu, deliberately transferring them to obscure actual ownership and deny Plaintiffs recovery. As Judge Enright put it, “The Court is not persuaded by Defendants’ claim that these transfers were effectuated to fix ‘mistakes’ in the ‘corporate structure’ and that ‘this is how it was supposed to be all along.’”

The Defendants names are Michael Pratt, Matthew Wolfe, Andre Garcia, Valorie Moser, and Teddy Gyi. Pratt, the owner of the company, is currently on the lam in his native New Zealand, which does have an extradition treaty for child sex charges, Moser and Gyi are out on bond, and Wolfe and Garcia are currently guests of the federal government, where we fervently hope they will remain for the rest of their natural lives.

“They’re so relieved, thanking us many times over—just overjoyed with the result. We’re going to do everything we can to get their images down and to get these guys to stop practicing the way they were,” Plaintiffs’ attorney John O’Brien told The Daily Beast. Small mercies, in a scary world.

Women Win $13 Million in GirlsDoPorn Fraud Suit [Courthouse News]
Amateur Porn Company Girls Do Porn Hit With $12.8M in Damages for Exploiting Young Women [Daily Beast]
Jane Does 1-22 v. GirlsDoPorn.com [via Courthouse News]


Elizabeth Dye lives in Baltimore where she writes about law and politics.

The Decade Wrapped

As we enter the roaring twenties, we look back on how the landscape of Biglaw has changed over the last ten years – from the height of the recession in 2010 to the recent bullish market. Here are some of the significant trends in from the last decade.

1) No Longer Swiping Left On Law.

Undergraduate students are once again taking the LSAT after the test taking rate dropped to a near nadir in 2015. Though there have been rumblings of a recession – which we have yet to realize – we predict this trend will continue into the new decade if firm expansion and growth continues, providing more landing spots for incoming attorneys.

2) California Dreaming.

Firms extended their reach across the U.S., as the second wave of manifest destiny also…manifested itself. Gone are the days where a California office was seen as a luxury, a sentiment mirrored by 41 Am Law 200 firms that opened offices in Los Angeles in the last decade and another 27 and 25 firms opened office in San Francisco and Palo Alto, respectively. Texas saw firms pour in, especially towards the second half of the decade. We predict smaller markets will continue to burgeon as firms look to take advantage of the relative cost-savings compared to the expensive New York, Los Angeles and D.C. markets, and the propagation of sophisticated clients to what was previously thought of as tertiary markets continues as technology erases physical barriers.

3) Feed Me Seymour.

Lewis Brisbois rounded out the decade as the most popular lateral destination of any Am Law 200 firm, lateralling in 1,914 attorneys, or to put it in more topical terms, the same number of people who went to see Cats during its opening weekend. Their overall headcount grew a healthy 150%. Unsurprisingly, lateral movement correlated strongly with firm size, but some firms take a page from the Lakers and rely much more on lateral movement than entry level hiring.

4) Growth Is Good.

Polsinelli has “glowed up” over the last decade, increasing their headcount a whopping 2200%. In an increasingly competitive landscape, firms are bifurcating largely into two groups – the firms seeking high margin work with a lean staffing model, and a lower margin model that offsets smaller margins with higher volume. What we’ve seen over the last decade is the chasm between these two groups has risen and the middle ground that used to be well populated has become increasingly sparse. We predict as time goes on, this trend will only continue.

5)  PPP For Me.

PPP rose 33% over the course of the decade, and partner compensation rose in tandem. Associate salaries also rose to record highs, but these gains are offset by inflation and rising costs of living. Barring another recession, we predict this trend will continue into the next decade, though the pace of growth may slow.

6) To Everything, Merge, Merge, Merge.

Ten years ago, Sonneschein Nath Rosenthal and Denton Wilde Sapte combined into what would become SNR Denton, a healthy firm with a little over 1,000 attorneys. Ten years later, Dentons is a powerhouse with over 10,000 attorneys after consummating an additional 10 more mergers or acquisitions with firms with over 100 attorneys, the largest of which saw them bring on Dacheng’s 3,000+ attorneys in China. With offices spanning 78 countries, there may soon be a day where there are more countries that have a Denton’s office than those that don’t.


Lateral Link is one of the top-rated international legal recruiting firms. With over 14 offices world-wide, Lateral Link specializes in placing attorneys at the most prestigious law firms and companies in the world. Managed by former practicing attorneys from top law schools, Lateral Link has a tradition of hiring lawyers to execute the lateral leaps of practicing attorneys. Click here to find out more about us.

Rev. Al Sharpton Calls Out Skadden

(Photo by Astrid Riecken/Getty Images)

The legal profession in general, and Biglaw specifically, has a problem with diversity. Hell, there’s an entire podcast dedicated to the issue (yes, I’m the host of the podcast and you should definitely listen). And while most firms acknowledge the need for change, and some are actually trying to make improvements, there’s still a lot to be done. Just ask the Reverend Al Sharpton.

Sharpton, along with Reverend Dale Dennis, used the occasion of the appointment of Tamika Montgomery-Reeves to the Delaware Supreme Court (the first person of color to be appointed to the state’s high court) to tee off on the problem of diversity in the legal profession. They did so by sending a pointed letter to Biglaw giant Skadden Arps calling them out for their lack of diversity, particularly in their Delaware office (you can read the full letter below):

While Skadden claims that “diversity and inclusion are fundamental to [its] success as a global law firm,” its presence in Wilmington tells a different story.

According to Skadden Arps’ own reporting on law firm diversity, of the 72 lawyers in the firm’s Wilmington office, exactly one Summer Associate is Black, while 9 of 10 partners are white. And of 49 full associates in the same office, just six are racial minorities.

Clearly, this is a systemic issue. One that has plagued the legal industry for decades, but one that must change. How can we achieve an equitable justice system if people of color aren’t afforded the opportunity to work at the most prestigious law firms? How can we expect the judges in our courts to reflect the racial, ethnic, and gender diversity of the communities they represent if they do not gain the experience needed to rise to those positions?

While the letter takes issue with the legal industry as a whole, Reverend Sharpton told Above the law why targeting Skadden specifically is so important:

“If we’re going to fix the institutional and systemic neglect of people of color in Delaware’s court system, it’s critical we look at where its justices come from. Take a look at judges like Chancery Court Chancellor Andrew Bouchard, or even retired Delaware Supreme Court Justice Leo Strine, where did they come from? Skadden Arps. One firm, Skadden Arps, has an especially significant impact on an entire state’s justice system. Therefore, Skadden Arps needs to lead the effort to more completely diversify the ranks of law firm partners and judges in this state.”

Sharpton and Dennis also wrote that they are commissioning a study of diversity in Delaware to better understand the contours of the problem:

To remedy these issues, we must first understand how deep they are. That is why we are commissioning a study on the state of diversity in Delaware’s legal industry. The study will give the people of Delaware, the 18th most diverse state in the country, the opportunity to understand how their diverse perspectives are represented in one of the state’s most prominent and lucrative industries.

We reached out to Skadden for comment, but have not as yet heard back.


headshotKathryn Rubino is a Senior Editor at Above the Law, and host of The Jabot podcast. AtL tipsters are the best, so please connect with her. Feel free to email her with any tips, questions, or comments and follow her on Twitter (@Kathryn1).

A Year Later: What I Can Do Better As A Lawyer

About one year ago I joined my current firm. I came to the firm not knowing how I would adjust after working for the government for more than three years. Now that the year is over, I thought I would note some of the lessons I’ve learned.

First, I think the best thing you can do when you start a new job is to trust and rely on your colleagues. Too many lawyers feel that they know it all. But we all need help when we begin a new position. Certain jobs have a certain way of doing things, and there is no way you’ll know how to do everything. Whether it is conforming to particular billing procedures or how your firm writes internal emails, you will need to ask questions. I believe that you should feel comfortable asking as many questions as possible because the sooner you learn how to do things correctly, the sooner you will be able to be more productive.

Second, if I could redo my first year at my job, I would own my cases more. Showing up at firm and getting handed a book of cases is difficult. But over time, as you become used to the clients and the case fact patterns, you should take an active role in running your cases. It’s easy to rely on your supervisors to make the big (and small) decisions for you. But then you aren’t really growing as a lawyer. I think that making all the decisions on your cases will help grow your confidence and will increase your standing among your colleagues. Too often I felt that I had to ask my supervisors what they thought or what they would do. I now know that if I do make a mistake, they will be there to counsel and correct me. But you are not going to learn to be a better lawyer without making some mistakes along the way.

Third, it’s particularly important to appreciate and utilize your support system at your job. When I started a year ago, I preferred to do everything myself. I didn’t use the paralegals and other support staff at the firm because I was afraid a mistake would be made. But, I quickly learned that you need to trust your support staff. There is way too much to do during the day to do everything yourself. As the year went on, I began to rely on the support staff more and realized how talented and dedicated they are. To that end, you should always convey how you appreciate the work that the support staff does by thanking them regularly and treating them with the respect they deserve.

Fourth, don’t be afraid to challenge the norms at your job. Now that I have been at my firm for a year, I have decided that I should have the confidence to challenge the way things are done if I think they are not being done correctly or efficiently. If you simply accept how things are done and don’t challenge the norms, neither you nor the firm will grow and adapt. The confidence to challenge the norms will come over time, but when you feel ready, you should be able to go to a supervisor and convey your ideas.

Fifth, I believe that after a year at a new position you should make a plan for your growth as a lawyer and at your job. Don’t rest on your laurels! Lawyers need to keep learning and growing as their careers progress. Also, you should plan for how you are going to progress at your current firm or position. No one wants to be a junior associate as an entire career. Start planning how to maximize your potential at your current job.

Finally, it’s very important to recharge your batteries. Whether it’s an early night after a busy week or taking a full vacation, you need time for yourself. No one can go nonstop. If you do, your work will suffer. An overtired lawyer is not a productive lawyer.

After a year at a new job, you should always evaluate how you are doing and go over the lessons you have learned. It’s good to reflect on yourself and your job. Hopefully, this article will help you do so.


Peter S. Garnett is an attorney at Balestriere Fariello who represents clients in trials, arbitrations, and appeals. He focuses his practice on complex commercial litigation and contract disputes from pre-filing investigations to trial and appeals. You can reach Peter at peter.s.garnett@balestrierefariello.com.

Judge Kozinski Accuser Faces New Fight With Romance Writers of America

It’s not surprising that there’s an organization like the Romance Writers of America. What’s surprising is that they have an ethics committee. While the Supreme Court continues to operate without any defining code of conduct, goddamned romance authors have an oversight board.

Heidi Bond became the former Ninth Circuit clerk to publicly outline sexual harassment claims against former Judge Alex Kozinski, claims that brought other women forward and ultimately resulted in Kozinski’s resignation. One of the low-key tragedies of Bond’s role in the Kozinski’s fall is that she only had the professional freedom to speak out because she had left the profession already. So many other former clerks who spoke out later had understandable career concerns about crossing one of the stars of the federal bench. But Bond, who had launched a literary career under the pen name “Courtney Milan” could and did get the ball rolling.

Now Bond is embroiled in a dispute with the Romance Writers of America where an ethics complaint accuses her of being the harasser… specifically a cyber “bully.” While the RWA vacillates over whether or not to expel Milan, who once chaired the ethics committee, the whole affair is blowing the lid off a seriously fucked up industry about writing about fucking.

From The Guardian:

The fact that Milan was then serving as the chair of RWA’s ethics committee was “akin to putting a neo-Nazi in charge of a UN human rights committee”, Tisdale wrote in her complaint, alleging that Milan had “continually and repeatedly” launched “disgusting attacks” against other authors and RWA members.

That’s some throbbing hyperbole. What would possibly make Bond a neo-Nazi?

“She is accusing me of being a racist simply because I am white,” Tisdale wrote.

There are not enough eyerolls in the world for this one.

Bond is in hot, bubbling water barely covering her supple Tweeting thumbs because she pointed out that the romance novel industry is replete with racist stereotypes. As a half Chinese woman, Bond took to social media to label another author’s book a “fucking racist mess” for its depiction of Asian women with “slanted almond eyes” and faces that were “almost yellow.” Defenders of the novel argue that had Bond read more of the book she would have “themes and plot points that establish precisely the opposite of what she claims” which undoubtedly means the heroine — who has blue eyes in the book? — grows beyond these Orientalist stereotypes, which as an arc, is also kind of racist. Normally one would assume that the Asian woman would have a better handle on what might constitute a negative Asian stereotype than a bunch of white women, but that’s apparently not a given within the RWA.

HelenKay Dimon, a past RWA president, previously told The Guardian that she regularly received letters from white RWA members expressing concern that “now nobody wants books by white Christian women”.

There is “a group of people who are white and who are privileged, who have always had 90% of everything available, and now all of a sudden, they have 80%. Instead of saying: ‘Ooh, look, I have 80%,’ they say: ‘Oh, I lost 10! Who do I blame for losing 10?’” Dimon said.

The RWA originally ruled that Milan “would be suspended from the group for a year, and barred for life from holding a leadership position.” After an outcry that led to multiple board members of color resigning, the group has rescinded its decision “pending a legal opinion.”

Look, discrimination — both structural and overt — is still rampant throughout the legal profession, but it might well be a diversity utopia compared to the romance novel industry. Bond is like a discrimination fire jumper parachuting from one awful hellscape of a profession into another. Get this woman some kind of medal.

A romance novelist spoke out about racism. An uproar ensued [The Guardian]
The Wrong Kind Of Racy [The Economist]

Earlier: Judge Kozinski Accused Of Sexual Misconduct


HeadshotJoe Patrice is a senior editor at Above the Law and co-host of Thinking Like A Lawyer. Feel free to email any tips, questions, or comments. Follow him on Twitter if you’re interested in law, politics, and a healthy dose of college sports news. Joe also serves as a Managing Director at RPN Executive Search.