Global Biglaw Firm To Launch Worldwide Cannabis Law Practice

Thanks to the growth of cannabis industry, Biglaw seems to be going up in smoke. While several firms have already joined the practice area, we’re told that one of the most prominent law firms in the world has decided to take a hit of the good stuff.

DLA Piper is launching a global cannabis law practice thanks to a “number of large cannabis regulatory advisory mandates,” and hopes to reap the benefits of the rapidly budding, billion-dollar industry. Law.com has the details:

The group will sit within the wider life sciences sector at the firm, and will be headed up by Toronto-based corporate partner Robert Fonn and London senior associate Dylan Kennett.

They will be supported by a team of 70 other lawyers and support staff in more than 15 countries across the firm’s network.

Kennett said in a statement: “With the likes of Canada leading the way in liberalizing cannabis in a considered manner, it was only a matter of time before other countries looked to Canada’s example on how best to similarly regulate their own markets.”

We’re sure that associates won’t want to puff, puff, pass on billable hours for the greenest practice area around. Congratulations to DLA Piper on its progressive new practice group.

DLA Piper Latest Firm to Join Booming Cannabis Trend [Law.com]


Staci ZaretskyStaci Zaretsky is a senior editor at Above the Law, where she’s worked since 2011. She’d love to hear from you, so please feel free to email her with any tips, questions, comments, or critiques. You can follow her on Twitter or connect with her on LinkedIn.

Judge Jackson Denies Recusal Motion, Refrains From Beating Roger Stone With Gavel

Roger Stone (Photo by Drew Angerer/Getty Images)

U.S. District Judge Amy Berman Jackson has had just about enough of Roger Stone’s bullshit.

On Friday the aging ratf*cker filed a motion to disqualify Judge Jackson for making an anodyne statement referring to “the jurors who served with integrity.” Thanking juries for their service occurs at roughly 100 percent of American trials, but Stone knows he’ll have to dominate the Fox news cycle if he wants a a pardon from President Couch Potato. So his lawyers seized on the comment as proof that Jackson had already made up her mind about his February 14 motion for a new trial based on claims of jury misconduct.

Stone’s legal team recently remembered that the African-American woman who served as jury foreperson is an outspoken Democrat — information she freely disclosed during voir dire — and are now demanding a new trial based on the well-known principal that only MAGA-hatted Republicans are eligible to sit on juries. Or something.

Anyway, Roger Stone guessed that he could get the President to shit-tweet about Jackson if he filed this bogus motion.

The Court’s ardent conclusion of “integrity” indicates an inability to reserve judgment on an issue which has yet been heard. Moreover, the categorical finding of integrity made before hearing the facts is likely to “lead a reasonably informed observer to question the District Judge’s impartiality.

And he was right.

He was probably also right that his insulting motion would provoke a slap-down which the wingnuts could spin as further proof that Jackson just hates poor, innocent Roger Stone. And yet … so, so richly deserved.

Noting that her three-word statement about the jury’s integrity did not amount to a “”finding’ about the pending motion for a new trial, much less a ‘categorical’ one,” Jackson went on to note that an “extrajudicial” statement pertains to information gleaned (or spoken) outside the courtroom, not personal observations during a nine-day trial, during which the defendant’s allies tried repeatedly to doxx jurors and sic the howler monkey brigade on them.

Jackson reminded Stone that, far from being biased against him, she’d let him continue on bail even after he tweeted an image of her head next to crosshairs, given him a sentence well below the statutory guidelines, and stricken 58 jurors for cause. Ahem.

And then, remarking that, “If parties could move to disqualify every judge who furrows his brow at one side or the other before ruling, the entire court system would come to a standstill,” she noted that “like all motions, it was  supposed to ‘be accompanied by a statement of the specific points of law and authority that support the motion,’ as well as a statement of the relevant facts.” AHEM.

After all that throat-clearing, Jackson concluded by calling out Stone’s blatant publicity-whoring.

At bottom, given the absence of any factual or legal support for the motion for disqualification, the pleading appears to be nothing more than an attempt to use the Court’s docket to disseminate a statement for public consumption that has the words “judge” and “biased” in it.

Unsurprisingly, Stone’s motion for recusal was denied. Also unsurprisingly, it played great in Wingnutistan. Third verse, same as the first.


Elizabeth Dye lives in Baltimore where she writes about law and politics.

All Heads And Hands On Deck To Build The Bright Future Of Law

The legal industry is in the midst of massive transformation. In a recent interview for the Global Legal Post, I explained why all of us — not just those who have historically had a voice in the legal industry or those who are technically savvy — must pitch in, have a seat at the table, and actively co-create.

Law is changing, and we need everyone on board.

Why? There are three big reasons.

Building The Future Of Law Is A Huge Job

We are not just rebuilding the façade of law. The entire plumbing is being modernized. And plumbing, of course, is critical. Think back to your most recent experience with real estate. While no one buys a house because of the plumbing (for my husband, it’s always about the pool; for me it’s is all about the spacious office where I can write my Above the Law articles surrounded by books, notebooks, and PostIt notes), very few of us seek a house without reliable plumbing. As lawyers, we’d say that it’s necessary but not sufficient.

Safeguarding Legal Principles Is Paramount

As we are modernizing the plumbing, let’s make sure we preserve the foundation. For example, we must safeguard basic principles, like “justice is blind” and “equal justice under the law.” After all, the words “law” (and its variations such as “legal”) and “bias,” let alone “systematic bias,” should never be in the same sentence.

Protecting the solid foundation is a “must-have,” not “nice to have.” Without the proper foundation, the process, people, and tech are just pretty decorations. After all, hanging a Picasso in a house with a crumbling foundation will most definitely not make the house habitable nor safe for your expensive art collection.

You Can’t Do Epic With Basic. Period.

Building the future of law is not a small, part-time gig for a select few to do on the side. It is a major job, and one for everyone. It might require some overtime. Whether you had an opportunity to attend law school and get admitted to your state’s bar should not matter. Whether you have been represented at the proverbial legal decision-making table in the past should not matter. And of course, obviously, your gender, ethnicity, origin, orientation, and other identity-based factors for exclusion should not matter. Between the process, people, and tech, there is a lot to do. And don’t even get me started about the complexities and intricacies of the disruptive technologies. We most cannot afford to exclude anyone who is willing!

Getting everyone involved in the development of the legal field will not be an easy project. Not everyone wants to spend their time thinking about the future of law — or with lawyers. The truth is, change can be exciting. When we gather different perspectives, experiences, and ideas, I’m confident that the outcome can be as exciting as the process we’re going to build to get there.


Olga V. Mack is the CEO of Parley Pro, a next-generation contract management company that has pioneered online negotiation technology. Olga embraces legal innovation and had dedicated her career to improving and shaping the future of law. She is convinced that the legal profession will emerge even stronger, more resilient, and more inclusive than before by embracing technology. Olga is also an award-winning general counsel, operations professional, startup advisor, public speaker, adjunct professor, and entrepreneur. Olga founded the Women Serve on Boards movement that advocates for women to participate on corporate boards of Fortune 500 companies. Olga also co-founded SunLaw, an organization dedicated to preparing women in-house attorneys to become general counsels and legal leaders, and WISE to help female law firm partners become rainmakers. She authored Get on Board: Earning Your Ticket to a Corporate Board Seat and Fundamentals of Smart Contract Security. You can email Olga at olga@olgamack.com or follow her on Twitter @olgavmack.

Poetic C&D Response Tells Biglaw To Get Lost In Verse

The cease and desist call and response is one of the few areas of legal practice that actually affords attorneys a bit of creative license. Without a judge involved, attorneys are free to let their snarky side show. We’ve even had a whole contest pitting the best letters we’ve received over the years against each other.

Software company Rippling began an advertising campaign calling out their rival Gusto by name on a billboard, prompting Gusto to take the time-honored step of making their Biglaw attorneys draft a cease and desist letter to get Rippling to stop being mean. Rippling GC Vanessa Wu decided to have some fun in response, replying in iambic pentameter as one does.

Enjoy.


HeadshotJoe Patrice is a senior editor at Above the Law and co-host of Thinking Like A Lawyer. Feel free to email any tips, questions, or comments. Follow him on Twitter if you’re interested in law, politics, and a healthy dose of college sports news. Joe also serves as a Managing Director at RPN Executive Search.

What Does The Senate Have In Common With Biglaw?

Like most Americans, any time I spent watching the impeachment proceedings frustrated me.

We can’t buy a principle in a world of partisanship.

What are the standards for impeachment? The views of all senators are now 180 degrees removed from their own standards of 20 years ago. Should there be witnesses at an impeachment hearing? The views of virtually all senators are now 180 degrees removed from their own standards of 20 years ago.  Should the decision to impeach be bipartisan?  The views of all senators are now 180 degrees removed from their own standards of 20 years ago.

And, of course, it doesn’t stop there.

Are you a deficit hawk?

Depends on who’s in office.

Are you in favor of free trade?

Depends on who’s in office.

It makes you want to scream.

Just before I screamed, I saw an objection to a motion to recover attorneys’ fees. Fees were recoverable; the sole question was the amount of fees.

And instead of screaming, I came to a realization.

I realized that Biglaw has this in common with the Senate: The only principle is whose ox is being gored.

The big, flabby firm that had been working the case got religion. The big firm had assigned unnecessary lawyers to the case, staffed stuff with lawyers that could have been done by paralegals, used senior associates where juniors would have sufficed, and blown through estimated fees. But then the firm saw the other side’s motion to recover attorneys’ fees.

“The other side wants how much in fees? That’s an outrage! Look at what they did! They staffed the case with way too many lawyers. Many tasks that should have been handled by paralegals were done by lawyers; that’s ridiculous.  They used senior associates where juniors would have sufficed. They estimated the experts’ fees wouldn’t exceed one million, and ultimately it cost two. Where’s the cost control? Write it up, guys; we have to object to this!”

The arguments of lawyers, of course, unlike those of senators, are supposed to bend to fit the situation.

But I still couldn’t stop shaking my head.


Mark Herrmann spent 17 years as a partner at a leading international law firm and is now deputy general counsel at a large international company. He is the author of The Curmudgeon’s Guide to Practicing Law and Drug and Device Product Liability Litigation Strategy (affiliate links). You can reach him by email at inhouse@abovethelaw.com.

Local Retiree Billionaire Says He’s Not Rich, Pretends He Was Ever Not Going To Vote For Trump This Year

‘Taken over by monkeys and baboons’ – Zimbabwe Vigil Diary – The Zimbabwean

Predictably defending Mugabe, Kasukuwere said Zimbabwe’s situation was worse under Mnangagwa who, he said, was protecting corrupt criminal cartels who were raping the nation, bleeding it of billions of dollars (see: https://bulawayo24.com/index-id-news-sc-national-byo-179741.html),

Many Zimbabweans appear ambivalent about the change of regime. They include youths who are meant to be inspired by a public holiday on Mugabe’s birthday. Cathy Buckle in her latest Letter from Zimbabwe says ‘it’s hard to see what our youth have got to celebrate. Unemployment around 90%, inflation over 500%, queues for money, food and fuel and not even electricity today. Hopes of getting a job are extremely slim; manufacturing capacity predicted at 27% this year and a guarantee of tear gas, police truncheons and brutality if you dare to demonstrate.’

Buckle’s comment about a clampdown on dissent is confirmed by a news report of a wave of arrests of people taking part in anti-government protests against the worsening political and economic crisis (see: https://bulawayo24.com/index-id-news-sc-national-byo-179751.html).

In her letter, Cathy Buckle looks at how food aid supposed to feed the hungry is being diverted to the black market by corrupt officials in Zimbabwe and sold in neighbouring countries: ‘A Parliamentary Portfolio Committee heard that abuse of the subsidised maize facility was rife. Senior executives in the government’s GMB (Grain Marketing Board) were implicated: allocating subsidised maize to millers far in excess of their capacity. The millers were in turn diverting the maize to the black market and selling it to neighbouring countries, making huge profits in the process. There were accounts of trucks from the DR Congo offloading copper in South Africa and on their return journey through Zimbabwe filling their empty trucks with our subsidised maize. The corruption extends to border officials who stamp documents with false declarations as to the source of the cargo on trucks which proceed to exit Zimbabwe loaded with our cheap maize.’

She goes on to note that 20 years ago this week the farm invasions began: ‘twenty years later Zimbabwe as a whole continues to pay the price of the destruction of commercial agriculture’ (see: http://cathybuckle.co.zw/looting-cheap-food-from-hungry-zimbabweans/).

Buckle’s comments are backed up by a coruscating news report: ‘Factories grind to a halt as Zimbabwe’s economy implodes’. The article notes: Zisco’s once-imposing steelworks are a series of derelict buildings, rusting pipes and sheets of corrugated iron. As the natural bush encroaches, the buildings are increasingly home to ever-opportunistic monkeys and baboons.’  (See:  https://finance.yahoo.com/news/factories-grind-halt-zimbabwe-economy-050000822.html),

Other points

  • February has been a turbulent time in the UK weatherwise with gales and endless rain causing widespread flooding. Nevertheless someone came down to join us today all the way from Scotland.
  • Thanks to those who braved the foul weather to help set up the Vigil today: Delice Gavazah, Jonathan Kariwo, Godfrey Katerere, Esther Munyira, Mary Muteyerwa, Qiniso Sibanda, Ephraim Tapa and Kevin Wheeldon. Thanks to Esther for looking after the front table, to Kevin for handing out flyers, to Mary and Delice for drumming and to Jonathan for photos. Thanks also for a further contribution to the ROHR’s Valentine fundraising dinner From Delice Gavazah.
  • For latest Vigil pictures check: http://www.flickr.com/photos/zimb88abwevigil/. Please note: Vigil photos can only be downloaded from our Flickr website.

FOR THE RECORD: ­­­10 signed the register.

 

EVENTS AND NOTICES:

  • ROHR fundraising dinner dance. Saturday 29th February from 6 pm till late. Postponed from 15th February because of bad weather. Venue: 38 Marcon Place, London E8 1LP. The event is in aid of women living with HIV/AIDS in rural Zimbabwe. Tickets £30. Contact: Esther Munyira 07492058107, Molly Ngavaimbe 07415443973, Patricia Masamba 07708116625 or Margaret Munenge 07384300283
  • ROHR general members’ meeting. Saturday 14th March from 11.30 am. Venue: Royal Festival Hall, South Bank Centre, Belvedere Road SE1 8XX. Contact: Ephraim Tapa 07940793090, Patricia Masamba 07708116625, Esther Munyira 07492058107.
  • The Restoration of Human Rights in Zimbabwe (ROHR) is the Vigil’s partner organization based in Zimbabwe. ROHR grew out of the need for the Vigil to have an organization on the ground in Zimbabwe which reflected the Vigil’s mission statement in a practical way. ROHR in the UK actively fundraises through membership subscriptions, events, sales etc to support the activities of ROHR in Zimbabwe. Please note that the official website of ROHR Zimbabwe is http://www.rohrzimbabwe.org/. Any other website claiming to be the official website of ROHR in no way represents us.
  • World Day of Prayer for Zimbabwe. Friday 6th March. This year the focus is on Zimbabwe and the service has been prepared by Christian women in Zimbabwe. The theme is ‘Rise! Take you mat and walk’. Christians all round the world will be praying for Zimbabwe. Try to get your own church involved. For more information check: https://www.wwdp.org.uk/.
  • Living on the Edge. Tuesday 10th March from 7 – 9 pm (doors open at 6 pm). Venue: Royal Geographical Society, 1 Kensington Gore, London SW7 2AR. The event is organised by the Mike Campbell Foundation. Among the speakers are Chief Felix Ndiweni and Beatrice Mtetwa. For full details of the event check: https://media.wix.com/ugd/02876c_5b68a136280c42ebbf39f8ebbb722299.pdf.
  • The Vigil’s book ‘Zimbabwe Emergency’ is based on our weekly diaries. It records how events in Zimbabwe have unfolded as seen by the diaspora in the UK. It chronicles the economic disintegration, violence, growing oppression and political manoeuvring – and the tragic human cost involved. It is available at the Vigil. All proceeds go to the Vigil and our sister organisation the Restoration of Human Rights in Zimbabwe’s work in Zimbabwe. The book is also available from Amazon.
  • Facebook pages:

    Vigil: https://www.facebook.com/zimbabwevigil
    ROHR: https://www.facebook.com/Restoration-of-Human-Rights-ROHR-Zimbabwe-International-370825706588551/
    ZAF:https://www.facebook.com/pages/Zimbabwe-Action-Forum-ZAF/490257051027515

Post published in: Featured

Morning Docket: 02.24.20

* The American Bar Association has won a lawsuit establishing that ABA employees qualify for public service loan forgiveness. It would have been kind of embarrassing if a group of lawyers lost this case… [Forbes]

* Joe Biden is receiving some flak for wrongly stating that his late son was the Attorney General of the United States. [Fox News]

* A number of Republican state attorneys general are trying to block the ratification of the Equal Rights Amendment. [ABC News]

* A $14 million settlement has been proposed in a class action concerning inmates masturbating in front of Cook County public defenders. [Chicago Sun Times]

* Justice Sotomayor wrote a scathing dissent on Friday criticizing the government for allegedly abusing the emergency application process at the Supreme Court. [Bloomberg]

* A minor league baseball team has revoked the tickets of a law firm that filed a case against the franchise on behalf of a client. This seems kind of petty. [The Athletic]


Jordan Rothman is a partner of The Rothman Law Firm, a full-service New York and New Jersey law firm. He is also the founder of Student Debt Diaries, a website discussing how he paid off his student loans. You can reach Jordan through email at jordan@rothmanlawyer.com.

Looting cheap food from hungry Zimbabweans – The Zimbabwean

Unemployment around 90%, inflation over 500%, queues for money, food and fuel and not even electricity today. Hopes of getting a job are extremely slim; manufacturing capacity predicted at 27% this year and a guarantee of tear gas, police truncheons and brutality if you dare to demonstrate.

For forty years Zimbabwe has been riddled with endemic corruption at the hands of the party in power. Nothing of any value: natural, man-made or donated has been spared: war victims compensation funds, cars, railways, aeroplanes, housing, oil, steel, gold, diamonds, airports, timber, electricity, banking and the list goes on and on. For the last two decades, corruption has been rampant around land and agriculture from the allocation of seized farms to government cronies, security personnel VIPs and members of the judiciary to farm mechanization funds, farm equipment, multiple farm holdings, the Command agriculture scheme, selling free inputs and this week the latest scandal of diverting subsidized maize has been exposed.

A Parliamentary Portfolio Committee heard that abuse of the subsidized maize facility was rife. Senior executives in the government’s GMB (Grain Marketing Board) were implicated: allocating subsidized maize to millers far in excess of their capacity. The millers were in turn diverting the maize to the black market and selling it to neighbouring countries, making huge profits in the process. There were accounts of trucks from the DR Congo offloading copper in South Africa and on their return journey through Zimbabwe filling their empty trucks with our subsidized maize. The corruption extends to border officials who stamp documents with false declarations as to the source of the cargo on trucks which proceed to exit Zimbabwe loaded with our cheap maize. Giving evidence to the Parliamentary Committee we heard that shops in Mozambique are selling Zimbabwean maize and callers to a radio programme saw our maize in shops in Malawi and further north on the route to the DR Congo.

Zimbabwe’s subsidized maize is imported grain and supposed to be assisting hungry and impoverished Zimbabweans. If you can find it, subsidized maize is supposed to sell for Z$70 for 10kgs but on the black market it sells for Z$140 and more than that in countries across our borders. Nothing is sacred in Zimbabwe, not even cheap food for starving people.

Twenty years ago this week farm invasions began in Zimbabwe and they have continued for much of the last two decades. In those horrific, terrifying days when we called police and begged them to help us when government supporters were burning, looting, destroying and evicting us and our employees from our homes and properties, the police would not come, saying it was political. That sentiment remains true today with government withdrawing leases from people who were allocated seized land but who are now perceived to be political rivals. An estimated one million people, (10% of our population at the time) who lived, worked on and owned those seized farms lost everything; we lost our homes, livelihoods, jobs, investments and pensions. But we were not the only losers. Twenty years later Zimbabwe as a whole continues to pay the price of the destruction of commercial agriculture.

This week the Zimbabwe government announced that they were introducing maximum farm sizes and would be taking away sections of land in excess of the new hectarages. Another wave of partisan land distributions is inevitable. After twenty years Zimbabwe has still not accepted the fact that you need commercial farmers to grow the country’s food and not your political allies and supporters.

With well over half of our population dependent on International Food Aid two decades later, the statistics of Zimbabwe’s agricultural production say it all: (Figures from the Mundi Index)
Wheat  (metric tons) 1999: 324,000             2019:  100,000
Maize (metric tons)    1999: 2,148,000          2019: 777,000
Soya (metric tons)      1999:  79,000              2019:   29,000
Cotton (217kg bags)   1999:  590,000            2019: 190,000
Sorghum (metric ton)    1999: 100,000         2019: 40,000

As I write this letter, our neighbours in South Africa are arriving at the same crossroad Zimbabwe faced twenty years ago: the expropriation of land without compensation. We hope they learn from us.

Until next time, thanks for reading this Letter From Zimbabwe, now in its 20th year, and my books about life in Zimbabwe, a country in waiting, love cathy 21 February 2020. Copyright © Cathy Buckle.  There is no charge for this letter but if you would like to contribute please visit my website http://cathybuckle.co. zw/
For information on my books about  Zimbabwe go to www.lulu.com/spotlight/ CathyBuckle2018  For archives of Letters From Zimbabwe, to subscribe/unsubscribe or to contact me please visit my website http://cathybuckle.co.zw/

Post published in: Featured

Civil Society takes stand against constitutional amendments – The Zimbabwean

st

Without any compromise members unanimously agreed that there will be no changes to the constitution before its full implementation.

In arriving at this decision, CiZC members analysed all proposed changes and came to a conclusion that the common denominator to all proposed changes is political emotion largely driven by the desire to consolidate power in the hands of the ruling elite. This will thus be achieved through a Constitutional amendment scheme that will see the president wielding too much executive powers in relation to the appointments of Vice Presidents, a shift from the current running mate provision in the 2013 Constitution, a provision which guarantees that the country does not go back to the one party state period.

The proposed amendments also relate to the appointments of the Prosecutor General, Public Protector, promotion of judges and the terms of office of judges, all of which is evident of the strong desire to impose the views of the ruling elite in all these appointments.

CiZC members noted that these changes are miles away from guaranteeing a democratic governance system as they have an effect of undermining traditional checks and balances existing in the yet to be implemented 2013 Constitution.

Of great concern to CSOs is the fact that the proposed amendments are not a result of any consultative process which involved citizens, thereby justifying the position taken by CSOs as the decision taken by the ruling elite does not single handedly justify fundamental changes to the constitution.

To defend this position, CiZC membership agreed to belt out a nationwide campaign educating citizens on the impact of the proposed changes and most importantly mobilizing citizens to reject in totality proposed Constitutional changes.

Post published in: Featured